Breve Análise do Smartphone LG V40 ThinQ

Name: LG V40 ThinQ
Brand: LG

Robust and with five cameras - O LG V40 ThinQ finalmente chegou à Alemanha depois de ter sido anunciado há mais de três meses. O V40 é uma evolução do seu antecessor, com a LG prometendo melhorar particularmente a tela e as câmeras. Leia mais para descobrir o que distingue o LG V40 ThinQ de outros carros chefe e como ele se desempenhou em nossos testes.

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ T. Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 02/25/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of LG Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

LG V40 ThinQ (V Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 8 x 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55 (Kryo 385)

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 630

Memória

6 GB

, LPDDR4x

Pantalha

6.40 polegadas 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixel 537 PPI, Rela táctil capacitiva, multitouch de 10 pontos , OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 107.2 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 2 TB - FAT, FAT32, arquivos de sistema exFAT suportados, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Barômetro, Bússola Digital, Giroscópio, Sensor de Proximidade, Sensor de Digitais, USB 2.0 Type-C, USB-OTG, Miracast, WiFi Direct, Wi-Fi Concurrency

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA +: Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8. LTE Cat. 18: Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 158.7 x 75.8

Bateria

3300 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Carregamento sem fio Qi, carga rápida

Sistema Operativo

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix , Super wide angle, 16 mm, f/1.9, 1.0 μm. 12MPix, standard, 27 mm, f/1.5, 1.4 μm. 12 MPix, telephoto, 52 mm, f/2.4, 1.0 μm, 2 x optical zoom. Camera2 API Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , standard, 26 mm, f/1.9, 1.4 μm. 5 MPix, wide angle, 21 mm, f/2.2, 1.4 μm.

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falante Boombox, DTS:X support, 32-bit Hi-Fi Quad DAC, Teclado: Virtual, Fones, Carregador, cabo USB Type-C, Ferramenta SIM, Guia de início rápido, pabo de microfibra, 24 Meses Garantia, Certificações IP68 e MIL-STD-810G1. SAR values: Head - 0.33 W/kg, Body - 1.353 W/kg, fanless

peso

169 g, Suprimento de energia: 73 g

Preço

899 Euro

Links

LG página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
LG V30 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	703 MBit/s +27%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	696 (647^min - 714^max) MBit/s +26%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	663 (289^min - 805^max) MBit/s +20%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	650 (6^min - 792^max) MBit/s +17%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	663 (507^min - 704^max) MBit/s +20%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	661 (613^min - 699^max) MBit/s +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	602 MBit/s +9%
LG V40 ThinQ Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	554 (492^min - 579^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	519 MBit/s -6%
Honor View 20 Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	298 (278^min - 319^max) MBit/s -46%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1001 (209^min - 1106^max) MBit/s +48%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	615 (532^min - 642^max) MBit/s -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	491 (100^min - 534^max) MBit/s -27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	685 (657^min - 705^max) MBit/s +1%
LG V40 ThinQ Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	677 (655^min - 698^max) MBit/s
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	674 (646^min - 691^max) MBit/s 0%
LG V30 Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	657 MBit/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	652 MBit/s -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	624 MBit/s -8%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s -44%
Honor View 20 Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	339 (325^min - 351^max) MBit/s -50%

LG V40 ThinQ; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø677 (655-698)

LG V40 ThinQ; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø554 (492-579)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


580 cd/m²	572 cd/m²	543 cd/m²
575 cd/m²	567 cd/m²	531 cd/m²
577 cd/m²	571 cd/m²	514 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 580 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 558.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 567 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.46

	LG V40 ThinQ OLED, 3120x1440, 6.40	LG V30 OLED, 2880x1440, 6.00	Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.20	Huawei Mate 20 Pro OLED, 3120x1440, 6.30	Apple iPhone Xs Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.50	ZTE Axon 9 Pro AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.21
Screen		-83%	-2%	11%	13%	-22%
Brightness middle	567	432 -24%	565 0%	576 2%	656 16%	521 -8%
Brightness	559	428 -23%	571 2%	582 4%	659 18%	517 -8%
Brightness Distribution	89	87 -2%	96 8%	90 1%	88 -1%	96 8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.3	4.18 -27%	2.3 30%	1.3 61%	1.7 48%	2.9 12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.1	8.53 -40%	4.8 21%	3.5 43%	2.8 54%	5.5 10%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.1	5.3 -382%	1.9 -73%	1.6 -45%	1.7 -55%	2.7 -145%
Gamma	2.46 ^89%	2.33 ^94%	2.16 ^102%	2.18 ^101%	1.998 ^110%	2.01 ^109%
CCT	6495 ^100%	7487 ^87%	6332 ^103%	6561 ^99%	6487 ^100%	6288 ^103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

250 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.4 ms rise
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2397 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	1900 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3776 Points +58%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3378 Points +41%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4774 Points +99%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	2333 Points -3%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3314 Points +38%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2418 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=27)	2416 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)	5228 Points +118%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8687 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	6078 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	8963 Points +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	10024 Points +15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	11244 Points +29%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8634 Points -1%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9868 Points +14%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8988 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=27)	8705 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)	14045 Points +62%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13519 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	8016 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	6202 Points -54%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	8938 Points -34%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	13374 Points -1%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9028 Points -33%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13505 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=25)	13578 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)	10872 Points -20%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	10361 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	6854 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	5822 Points -44%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	12535 Points +21%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	10052 Points -3%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	12778 Points +23%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9795 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=26)	10123 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)	15091 Points +46%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8141 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	5603 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	5319 Points -35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	9225 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8326 Points +2%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9243 Points +14%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8099 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7360 - 9868, n=27)	8368 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)	10872 Points +34%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	58651 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	34139 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	39745 Points -32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	57047 Points -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	77599 Points +32%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	64627 Points +10%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	57073 Points -3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	63295 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=27)	61139 Points +4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	79818 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	55271 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	46610 Points -42%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	67730 Points -15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	159735 Points +100%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	83976 Points +5%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	67388 Points -16%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	81640 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 85487, n=27)	80548 Points +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	30418 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	14601 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	26226 Points -14%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	36755 Points +21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	27717 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	35987 Points +18%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	37164 Points +22%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35430 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=27)	33322 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4947 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	4738 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3895 Points -21%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4996 Points +1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	5205 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	6118 Points +24%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4979 Points +1%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6355 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4363 - 6454, n=27)	5811 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6439 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	5895 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4637 Points -28%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5305 Points -18%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	7055 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8236 Points +28%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5252 Points -18%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8219 Points +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=27)	7763 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2731 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	2808 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	2496 Points -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4150 Points +52%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2713 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3221 Points +18%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4214 Points +54%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3543 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2124 - 3668, n=27)	3115 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4842 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	4728 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4018 Points -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5456 Points +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	6667 Points +38%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	6054 Points +25%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5087 Points +5%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6487 Points +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4034 - 6568, n=27)	5761 Points +19%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6024 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	5819 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4797 Points -20%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5854 Points -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	10374 Points +72%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8245 Points +37%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5327 Points -12%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8341 Points +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5228 - 8451, n=27)	7671 Points +27%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +171%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2871 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	2855 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	2561 Points -11%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4407 Points +54%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2961 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3060 Points +7%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4393 Points +53%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3649 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2110 - 3763, n=27)	3094 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points +54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3802 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	3635 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3256 Points -14%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4201 Points +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3544 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3677 Points -3%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4238 Points +11%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4729 Points +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=27)	4388 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)	2755 Points -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4275 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	3903 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3582 Points -16%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4206 Points -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3726 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4223 Points -1%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4256 Points 0%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5181 Points +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5246, n=27)	4919 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)	2751 Points -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2740 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	2931 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	2469 Points -10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4183 Points +53%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3027 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	2653 Points -3%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4175 Points +52%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3623 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=27)	3217 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)	3163 Points +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3741 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	3559 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3420 Points -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4275 Points +14%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4121 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3846 Points +3%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3847 Points +3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5088 Points +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3512 - 5200, n=28)	4607 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=182, last 2 years)	6737 Points +80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4133 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	3809 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3792 Points -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4250 Points +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4828 Points +17%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4480 Points +8%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3718 Points -10%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5741 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4133 - 8206, n=28)	5439 Points +32%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=181, last 2 years)	9723 Points +135%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2809 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	2893 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	2546 Points -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4364 Points +55%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2723 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	2802 Points 0%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4381 Points +56%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3639 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2185 - 3764, n=28)	3088 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=181, last 2 years)	4224 Points +50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	60 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	61 fps +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	60 fps 0%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	60 fps 0%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=27)	62.1 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)	84.6 fps +41%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	105 fps
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	113 fps +8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	147 fps +40%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	120 fps +14%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	226 fps +115%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	152 fps +45%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	118 fps +12%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	150 fps +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=28)	142.5 fps +36%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)	247 fps +135%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	33 fps
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	35 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	45 fps +36%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	42 fps +27%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	59 fps +79%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	56 fps +70%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	59 fps +79%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (33 - 75, n=27)	54.4 fps +65%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)	72.2 fps +119%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	59 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	74 fps +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	73 fps +24%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	107 fps +81%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	81 fps +37%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	67 fps +14%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	82 fps +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=27)	73.1 fps +24%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)	140.6 fps +138%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	21 fps
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	19 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	24 fps +14%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	26 fps +24%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	58.9 fps +180%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	50 fps +138%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	48 fps +129%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	55 fps +162%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21 - 59, n=27)	45.3 fps +116%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)	60.9 fps +190%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	41 fps
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	40 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	47 fps +15%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	29 fps -29%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	69.3 fps +69%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	59 fps +44%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	50 fps +22%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=28)	53.9 fps +31%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)	99 fps +141%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13 fps
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	13 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	14 fps +8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	16 fps +23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	31 fps +138%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	30 fps +131%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	28 fps +115%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	33 fps +154%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 37, n=27)	27.7 fps +113%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)	43.4 fps +234%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	26 fps
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	24 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	28 fps +8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	31 fps +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	40 fps +54%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	35 fps +35%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	32 fps +23%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=27)	33.4 fps +28%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)	59.9 fps +130%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	16 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	18 fps +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	47 fps +194%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	20 fps +25%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	31 fps +94%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps +119%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (16 - 40, n=17)	29.1 fps +82%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years)	44 fps +175%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	30 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	33 fps +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	36.8 fps +23%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	30 fps 0%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	34 fps +13%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	37 fps +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (29 - 38, n=16)	35.2 fps +17%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=226, last 2 years)	64.3 fps +114%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	12 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	19 fps +58%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	32.1 fps +168%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	20 fps +67%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	20 fps +67%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (12 - 25, n=17)	18.6 fps +55%
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=226, last 2 years)	32.8 fps +173%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	12 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	13 fps +8%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	16.3 fps +36%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	31 fps +158%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	14 fps +17%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	22 fps +83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (11 - 31, n=17)	15.6 fps +30%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=226, last 2 years)	25.6 fps +113%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	25.57 (7.38^min - 46.96^max) fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21.3 - 32.9, n=5)	27.5 fps
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	16.92 (6.06^min - 28.78^max) fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15.8 - 29.7, n=5)	22.8 fps
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	29.12 (9.74^min - 74.17^max) fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (24.5 - 35.3, n=5)	30.9 fps

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	270884 Points
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	250577 Points -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	300617 Points +11%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	302955 Points +12%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	292798 Points +8%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	306296 Points +13%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	287049 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=27)	277434 Points +2%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	229374 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	173749 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	222290 Points -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	250848 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	228173 Points -1%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	252800 Points +10%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	231092 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=23)	225534 Points -2%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5025 Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4598 - 4731, n=4)	4689 Score
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years)	5985 Score

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3565 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	2702 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3302 Points -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4687 Points +31%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4895 Points +37%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4287 Points +20%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4746 Points +33%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4454 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3291 - 4693, n=26)	4111 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +62%
System (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6717 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	4238 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	6413 Points -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	8604 Points +28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	11675 Points +74%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8146 Points +21%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8594 Points +28%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8212 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4417 - 8613, n=26)	7644 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points +44%
Memory (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2910 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	2091 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	2625 Points -10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	6283 Points +116%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	1815 Points -38%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3791 Points +30%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5616 Points +93%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4492 Points +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=26)	3649 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points +115%
Graphics (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6726 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	5949 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	6370 Points -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	6273 Points -7%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	15659 Points +133%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	7891 Points +17%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	7484 Points +11%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7930 Points +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=26)	7797 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points +111%
Web (sort by value)
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1228 Points
LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Adreno 540, 4096	1009 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	1109 Points -10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	1424 Points +16%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	1731 Points +41%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	1386 Points +13%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	1404 Points +14%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1345 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=26)	1344 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points +22%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	1481 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	1571 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2407 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1169 - 1201, n=5)	1179 Points
Average of class Smartphone (177 - 6114, n=58, last 2 years)	2240 Points

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	273 Points +231%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	109.2 Points +32%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	108.1 Points +31%
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points +26%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)	86 Points +4%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	82.6 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25)	80.3 Points -3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71)	70.1 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)	69.6 Points -16%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)	52.9 Points -36%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	43114 Points +171%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)	33503 Points +111%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	23285 Points +46%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	22500 Points +41%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)	16489 Points +4%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	15906 Points
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71)	15819 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28)	15153 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)	14760 Points -7%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)	10506 Points -34%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
LG V30 (Chrome 62)	3630 ms * -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28)	2905 ms * -23%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	2361 ms *
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71)	2358 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)	2300 ms * +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)	2060 ms * +13%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	2048 ms * +13%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	1952 ms * +17%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +32%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	603 ms * +74%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	155 Points +65%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +42%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	124 Points +32%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	99 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)	95 Points +1%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	94 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=17)	90.2 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	64 Points -32%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	347 Points +30%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	334 Points +25%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	267 Points
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	263 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)	260 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=23)	246 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)	164 Points -39%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)	138 Points -48%

* ... smaller is better

	LG V40 ThinQ	LG V30	Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	Huawei Mate 20 Pro	Xiaomi Mi Mix 3	Honor View 20	ZTE Axon 9 Pro	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-26%	3%	105%	-4%	143%	1%	87%	430%
Sequential Read 256KB	690	669 -3%	819 19%	853 24%	675 -2%	847 23%	719 4%	760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113) 10%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 119%
Sequential Write 256KB	203.9	193.2 -5%	204.9 0%	196.4 -4%	206.8 1%	250.1 23%	196.4 -4%	297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113) 46%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 448%
Random Read 4KB	130.1	78.2 -40%	129.7 0%	157.4 21%	133.2 2%	168.9 30%	141.3 9%	152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113) 18%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 90%
Random Write 4KB	23.36	10.21 -56%	22.74 -3%	157.8 576%	19.54 -16%	138.9 495%	22.52 -4%	131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113) 463%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 1064%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	62.8 -26%	79.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7%	83.2 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB) -2%			85.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	76 ?(13.4 - 88.3, n=43) -10%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	63.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	47.2 -25%	67.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	72.4 ?(Huawei NanoSD 128 GB) 15%			61.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	59.6 ?(8.4 - 72.4, n=43) -6%

PUBG Mobile

LG V40 ThinQ; 0.10.0: Ø39.3 (7-41)

Battle Bay

LG V40 ThinQ; 4.2.22023: Ø60.3 (57-61)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


32.9 °C	33.4 °C	30.5 °C
30.6 °C	32 °C	29.8 °C
29.6 °C	30.5 °C	28.9 °C

Máximo: 33.4 °C
Médio: 30.9 °C


28.9 °C	31.1 °C	33.2 °C
28.4 °C	30.2 °C	31.6 °C
28.1 °C	29.5 °C	30.4 °C

Máximo: 33.2 °C
Médio: 30.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 25.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

LG V40 ThinQ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Ocioso	0.87 / 1.39 / 1.41 Watt
Carga	3.96 / 8.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh	LG V30 3300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 3200 mAh	Honor View 20 4000 mAh	ZTE Axon 9 Pro 4000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		8%	20%	-22%	-6%	27%	-44%	-3%	-20%	-12%
Idle Minimum *	0.87	0.72 17%	0.68 22%	0.95 -9%	1 -15%	0.49 44%	0.97 -11%	0.86 1%	0.862 ?(0.42 - 1.8, n=26) 1%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) -3%
Idle Average *	1.39	1.37 1%	0.95 32%	2.17 -56%	1.4 -1%	0.67 52%	2.58 -86%	1.1 21%	1.728 ?(0.67 - 2.9, n=26) -24%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) -4%
Idle Maximum *	1.41	1.41 -0%	1.09 23%	2.25 -60%	1.7 -21%	0.87 38%	2.63 -87%	1.21 14%	2.07 ?(0.87 - 3.5, n=26) -47%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) -16%
Load Average *	3.96	3.46 13%	4.58 -16%	4.47 -13%	4.6 -16%	3.64 8%	5.24 -32%	5.02 -27%	4.87 ?(3.56 - 7.41, n=26) -23%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -40%
Load Maximum *	8.6	7.83 9%	5.16 40%	6.15 28%	6.7 22%	9.04 -5%	8.73 -2%	10.82 -26%	9.27 ?(6.2 - 12.3, n=26) -8%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) 3%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		19h 00min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 71)		8h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 59min
Carga (máximo brilho)		5h 20min

	LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh	LG V30 3300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 3200 mAh	Honor View 20 4000 mAh	ZTE Axon 9 Pro 4000 mAh
Battery Runtime		32%	-1%	30%	13%	22%	42%	30%
Reader / Idle	1140	1914 68%	1343 18%	1747 53%	1305 14%	1810 59%	1928 69%
H.264	659	822 25%	674 2%	854 30%	801 22%	836 27%	932 41%
WiFi v1.3	510	774 52%	521 2%	767 50%	742 45%	719 41%	969 90%	661 30%
Load	320	267 -17%	237 -26%	282 -12%	223 -30%	194 -39%	222 -31%

Pro

+ Tela OLED brilhante e com cores precisas

+ SoC veloz

+ aptX HDH

+ Armazenamento expansível

+ Conector para fones

+ Hi-Fi Quad DAC

+ Carregamento sem fio

+ Bom sistema de câmeras traseiras triplas

+ Módulo GPS preciso

+ Certificações IP68 e MIL-STG-810G1

+ Garantia de até quatro anos

Contra

- Duração da bateria medíocre

- Somente USB 2.0

- PWM cintilante da tela

- O lançamento atrasado agora o torna sobrevalorizado

The LG V40 ThinQ. Test device courtesy of LG Germany.

O LG V40 ThinQ melhora o V30 e integra alguns dos bons recursos do G7 ThinQ, oferecendo melhor desempenho do sistema e de câmeras do que ambos.

No entanto, as câmeras, apesar de seu volume, não se comparam as melhores que estão atualmente no mercado. A bateria também é muito pequena para a energia que a tela de alta resolução, DAC e SoC consomem. Os três alto-falantes também não são tão bons quanto poderiam ser, o que é decepcionante.

O LG V40 ThinQ é susceptível de ser esquecido com a chegada dos carros chefe de 2019, o que é uma pena, pois é um excelente smartphone que fica aquém da grandeza em áreas vitais.

Estas são as únicas desvantagens reais do V40. Ele possui uma das câmeras de vídeo mais versáteis de qualquer smartphone no mercado, e seu design é discreto, mas premium. Os codecs Hi-Fi Quad DAC e de alta resolução Bluetooth também são bem-vindos e devem garantir que o V40 ofereça uma qualidade de áudio excepcional, independentemente de se você escuta com ou sem fio.

Uma desvantagem do V40 é o seu preço. O LG G8 ThinQ será lançado nos próximos dias, o que superará o V40 em muitas áreas, por isso seu atraso no lançamento e chegada deste último na Europa parece estranho. Esperamos que o seu preço caia dentro de alguns meses, embora assim como aconteceu com o V30, assim o LG V40 ThinQ pode ser um sucesso tardio em 2019.

LG V40 ThinQ - 2022-09-03 09/03/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento

88%

Teclado

67 / 75 → 90%

Mouse

91%

Conectividade

47 / 70 → 67%

Peso

91%

Bateria

85%

Pantalha

90%

Desempenho do jogos

42 / 64 → 66%

Desempenho da aplicação

68 / 86 → 79%

Temperatura

94%

Ruído

100%

Audio

44 / 90 → 49%

Camera

79%

Médio

76%

83%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 9924 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone LG V40 ThinQ

Daniel Schmidt, 2019-02-25 (Update: 2019-02-27)

Breve Análise do Smartphone LG V40 ThinQ

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Mobile

Battle Bay

LG V40 ThinQ audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare