Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/23/2018

Pure luxury? O nome diz tudo: O Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS quer oferecer puro luxo, o que se reflete no preço exorbitante do aparelho. Descubra nesta análise se vale a pena ou não investir pesado em um dos smartphones mais caros do mundo.

Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
Memória
6144 MB 
Pantalha
6 polegadas 16:8, 2880 x 1440 pixel 537 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 240 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: Saída de áudio sobre USB Type-C, 2 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Giroscópio, Sensor de proximidade, Bússola, USB On-The-Go (OTG), transmissor de infravermelhos
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G: 850, ​900, ​1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, ​B2, ​B4, ​B5, ​B6, ​B8, ​B19, ​B34, ​B39. 4G: B1, ​B2, B3, ​B4, ​B5, ​B7, ​B8, ​B9, ​B12, ​B17, ​B18, ​B19, ​B20, ​B26, ​B28, B32, ​B34, ​B38, ​B39, ​B40, ​B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.5 x 152.9 x 72.5
Bateria
15.2 Wh, 4000 mAh Lítio-Ion, Quick Charge
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 40 MPix Câmera principal: f/1.8, Contrast Autofocus (AF), Laser Autofocus (AF), Phase Autofocus (AF), Dual LED flash, Videos at up to 2160p, 960 FPS videos at up to 720p. Monochrome sensor: 20 MP, depth of field. Telephoto Lens: 8 MP, f/2.4
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Leather case, Headphones, USB Type-A to Type-C cable, Charger, SIM tool, USB Type-C to 3.5 mm jack adapter, 24 Meses Garantia, IP67-certified, LTE Cat 18/​13 (1200Mbps/​150Mbps), SAR-value: 1.2W/​kg (body), fanless
peso
183 g, Suprimento de energia: 85 g
Preço
1695 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 MBit/s ∼100% +118%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
650 MBit/s ∼96% +109%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
485 MBit/s ∼72% +56%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 MBit/s ∼50% +9%
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
311 (min: 54, max: 469) MBit/s ∼46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=297)
205 MBit/s ∼30% -34%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
587 MBit/s ∼91% +5%
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
560 (min: 445, max: 611) MBit/s ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
485 MBit/s ∼75% -13%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
225 MBit/s ∼35% -60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=297)
200 MBit/s ∼31% -64%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø310 (54-469)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø560 (445-611)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Through a wooded area
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Through a wooded area
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS - Overview
GPS test: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS - Overview
GPS test: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS - Through a wooded area
GPS test: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS - Through a wooded area
GPS test: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS - Bridge
GPS test: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS - Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker: The lower half of each area of color displays the reference color
ColorChecker: The lower half of each area of color displays the reference color
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
Our test chart in detail
460
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 484 cd/m² Médio: 454.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.05 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 450 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.39 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
134.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.162
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
AMOLED, 2880x1440, 6
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.4
Apple iPhone XS
OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Screen
27%
18%
49%
44%
Brightness middle
450
477
6%
499
11%
639
42%
629
40%
Brightness
455
453
0%
506
11%
637
40%
636
40%
Brightness Distribution
89
86
-3%
96
8%
94
6%
94
6%
Black Level *
0.33
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.39
2.1
67%
4.62
28%
1
84%
1.7
73%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.25
8.2
33%
10.91
11%
2.2
82%
3.6
71%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.7
1.6
57%
2.2
41%
2.2
41%
2.4
35%
Gamma
2.162 102%
2.28 96%
2.103 105%
1.9 116%
2.15 102%
CCT
7224 90%
6425 101%
6115 106%
6364 102%
6337 103%
Contrast
1445

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8773 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
181973 Points ∼80%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
226124 Points ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
214090 Points ∼95% +18%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points ∼78% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (173653 - 181973, n=8)
177915 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 250848, n=382)
74754 Points ∼33% -59%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
207800 Points ∼60%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
246366 Points ∼71% +19%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
236552 Points ∼68% +14%
Apple iPhone XS
348178 Points ∼100% +68%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
212278 Points ∼61% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (152773 - 212278, n=6)
197811 Points ∼57% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=162)
115755 Points ∼33% -44%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
6998 Points ∼86%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8178 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
5184 Points ∼63% -26%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points ∼85% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6293 - 7046, n=8)
6860 Points ∼84% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2829 - 9868, n=244)
4496 Points ∼55% -36%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
8540 Points ∼87%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
9858 Points ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
5960 Points ∼60% -30%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points ∼86% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (8115 - 9326, n=8)
8537 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3681 - 13211, n=412)
4894 Points ∼50% -43%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
1296 Points ∼76%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
1400 Points ∼82% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
1132 Points ∼66% -13%
Apple iPhone XS
1711 Points ∼100% +32%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points ∼72% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1091 - 1316, n=8)
1245 Points ∼73% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=488)
691 Points ∼40% -47%
Graphics (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
3575 Points ∼23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
7743 Points ∼49% +117%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
6506 Points ∼41% +82%
Apple iPhone XS
15875 Points ∼100% +344%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points ∼23% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2231 - 4397, n=8)
3638 Points ∼23% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=488)
1687 Points ∼11% -53%
Memory (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
4578 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3704 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
2068 Points ∼45% -55%
Apple iPhone XS
4169 Points ∼91% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points ∼90% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2417 - 4578, n=8)
3946 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=488)
1213 Points ∼26% -74%
System (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
5987 Points ∼49%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8418 Points ∼69% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
6137 Points ∼50% +3%
Apple iPhone XS
12202 Points ∼100% +104%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points ∼43% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3795 - 5987, n=8)
5387 Points ∼44% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=488)
2453 Points ∼20% -59%
Overall (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
3357 Points ∼55%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4288 Points ∼70% +28%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
3110 Points ∼51% -7%
Apple iPhone XS
6097 Points ∼100% +82%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points ∼52% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2174 - 3374, n=8)
3125 Points ∼51% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=492)
1225 Points ∼20% -64%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
5779 Points ∼40%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
14417 Points ∼100% +149%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
9059 Points ∼63% +57%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points ∼59% +48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (5779 - 9015, n=6)
8080 Points ∼56% +40%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=186)
4418 Points ∼31% -24%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
6791 Points ∼59%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8522 Points ∼73% +25%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
8874 Points ∼77% +31%
Apple iPhone XS
11598 Points ∼100% +71%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points ∼59% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6557 - 6792, n=8)
6697 Points ∼58% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=235)
4232 Points ∼36% -38%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
1908 Points ∼40%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2457 Points ∼51% +29%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
1698 Points ∼35% -11%
Apple iPhone XS
4824 Points ∼100% +153%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points ∼39% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1883 - 1922, n=8)
1901 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=236)
1249 Points ∼26% -35%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
2918 Points ∼81%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3620 Points ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
2569 Points ∼71% -12%
Apple iPhone XS
2960 Points ∼82% +1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points ∼79% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2582 - 2931, n=8)
2842 Points ∼79% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 4183, n=342)
1631 Points ∼45% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
3012 Points ∼58%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5190 Points ∼100% +72%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
3673 Points ∼71% +22%
Apple iPhone XS
3712 Points ∼72% +23%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points ∼55% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2844 - 3040, n=8)
2994 Points ∼58% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5241, n=342)
1172 Points ∼23% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
2991 Points ∼63%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4734 Points ∼100% +58%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
3353 Points ∼71% +12%
Apple iPhone XS
3514 Points ∼74% +17%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points ∼60% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2850 - 2999, n=8)
2958 Points ∼62% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=350)
1120 Points ∼24% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
2902 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2541 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
2515 Points ∼87% -13%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points ∼100% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1906 - 2902, n=8)
2732 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4150, n=373)
1519 Points ∼52% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
3415 Points ∼42%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8219 Points ∼100% +141%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4826 Points ∼59% +41%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points ∼41% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1954 - 3734, n=8)
3305 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8312, n=373)
1589 Points ∼19% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
3286 Points ∼60%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5492 Points ∼100% +67%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4008 Points ∼73% +22%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points ∼59% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1943 - 3487, n=8)
3155 Points ∼57% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 6378, n=381)
1353 Points ∼25% -59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
22826 Points ∼62%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
36762 Points ∼100% +61%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
18756 Points ∼51% -18%
Apple iPhone XS
27400 Points ∼75% +20%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points ∼62% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (14556 - 23046, n=8)
21027 Points ∼57% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 36794, n=527)
12686 Points ∼35% -44%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
32972 Points ∼21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
81502 Points ∼51% +147%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
36190 Points ∼23% +10%
Apple iPhone XS
160199 Points ∼100% +386%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points ∼21% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (22429 - 36231, n=8)
32596 Points ∼20% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=527)
17520 Points ∼11% -47%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
30008 Points ∼39%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
64152 Points ∼83% +114%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
29994 Points ∼39% 0%
Apple iPhone XS
77128 Points ∼100% +157%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points ∼40% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (20022 - 31605, n=8)
29035 Points ∼38% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=528)
14743 Points ∼19% -51%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
45 fps ∼18%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
150 fps ∼60% +233%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
146 fps ∼58% +224%
Apple iPhone XS
251 fps ∼100% +458%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps ∼45% +149%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (45 - 125, n=8)
108 fps ∼43% +140%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=551)
30.2 fps ∼12% -33%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
42 fps ∼70%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
60 fps ∼100% +43%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
60 fps ∼100% +43%
Apple iPhone XS
60 fps ∼100% +43%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps ∼100% +43%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (42 - 60, n=8)
57.4 fps ∼96% +37%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=554)
24.4 fps ∼41% -42%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
23 fps ∼20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
71 fps ∼62% +209%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
76 fps ∼66% +230%
Apple iPhone XS
115 fps ∼100% +400%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps ∼47% +135%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (23 - 66, n=8)
54.6 fps ∼47% +137%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=473)
16.2 fps ∼14% -30%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
26 fps ∼43%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼97% +123%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
47 fps ∼78% +81%
Apple iPhone XS
60 fps ∼100% +131%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps ∼93% +115%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (26 - 56, n=8)
50.4 fps ∼84% +94%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=476)
15.5 fps ∼26% -40%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
19 fps ∼31%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼94% +205%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
45 fps ∼73% +137%
Apple iPhone XS
62 fps ∼100% +226%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps ∼60% +95%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (19 - 39, n=8)
33.9 fps ∼55% +78%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 88, n=336)
13.8 fps ∼22% -27%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
18 fps ∼32%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
56 fps ∼100% +211%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
25 fps ∼45% +39%
Apple iPhone XS
48 fps ∼86% +167%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps ∼68% +111%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (18 - 39, n=8)
33.6 fps ∼60% +87%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=339)
13.5 fps ∼24% -25%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
11 fps ∼29%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
35 fps ∼92% +218%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
28 fps ∼74% +155%
Apple iPhone XS
38 fps ∼100% +245%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps ∼55% +91%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (11 - 23, n=8)
20.4 fps ∼54% +85%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 54, n=268)
9.6 fps ∼25% -13%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
10 fps ∼27%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
37 fps ∼100% +270%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
15 fps ∼41% +50%
Apple iPhone XS
31 fps ∼84% +210%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps ∼59% +120%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (10 - 23, n=8)
19.8 fps ∼54% +98%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 58, n=271)
8.67 fps ∼23% -13%

Legend

 
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
272.3 Points ∼100% +378%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
71.172 Points ∼26% +25%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
63.012 Points ∼23% +11%
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS (Chrome 69)
56.981 Points ∼21%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
56.63 Points ∼21% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (33.1 - 58.6, n=8)
51.4 Points ∼19% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=410)
36.2 Points ∼13% -36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
43280 Points ∼100% +266%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
14663 Points ∼34% +24%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
13360 Points ∼31% +13%
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS (Chrome 69)
11838 Points ∼27%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
10406 Points ∼24% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6692 - 11838, n=8)
10111 Points ∼23% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=547)
5468 Points ∼13% -54%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=567)
11574 ms * ∼100% -208%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3591 - 6221, n=8)
4378 ms * ∼38% -16%
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS (Chrome 69)
3762 ms * ∼33%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
3590.6 ms * ∼31% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
3179 ms * ∼27% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
2710 ms * ∼23% +28%
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
609.1 ms * ∼5% +84%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
345 Points ∼100% +84%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
211 Points ∼61% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68)
202 Points ∼59% +8%
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS (Chrome 69)
187 Points ∼54%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (119 - 187, n=8)
165 Points ∼48% -12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)
158 Points ∼46% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=276)
108 Points ∼31% -42%

* ... smaller is better

Porsche Design Huawei Mate RSSony Xperia XZ2 PremiumSamsung Galaxy Note 9Huawei Mate 10 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-34%
-30%
-9%
-16%
-77%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
30.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
45.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=313)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
34.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.5 (8.2 - 96.5, n=313)
Random Write 4KB
160.3
21.75
-86%
21
-87%
164.45
3%
91.2 (22.1 - 160, n=2)
-43%
15.4 (0.14 - 164, n=595)
-90%
Random Read 4KB
144.3
135.99
-6%
134
-7%
132.27
-8%
136 (127 - 144, n=2)
-6%
37.4 (1.59 - 173, n=596)
-74%
Sequential Write 256KB
241.7
170.98
-29%
196
-19%
208.72
-14%
235 (228 - 242, n=2)
-3%
78.5 (2.99 - 246, n=596)
-68%
Sequential Read 256KB
873.1
748.59
-14%
805
-8%
732.46
-16%
780 (687 - 873, n=2)
-11%
226 (12.1 - 895, n=596)
-74%
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min31 fps
 high HD30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Asphalt 9: Legends
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 High Quality30 fps
 Standard / low30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 48.3 °C46.1 °C43.3 °C 
 47.1 °C45.3 °C45.1 °C 
 45.3 °C45.2 °C42.7 °C 
Máximo: 48.3 °C
Médio: 45.4 °C
38.1 °C42 °C47.6 °C
38.6 °C42.1 °C44.8 °C
38.8 °C42 °C43.2 °C
Máximo: 47.6 °C
Médio: 41.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  43 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 326 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.431.72535.230.33137.732.14036355037.737.46323.324.48021.922.510020.122.612518.428.71601938.920016.750.825015.554.531519.75540014.356.850013.856.663012.656.580012.754.2100012.357125011.55916001166.920001170.8250010.872315010.770.5400010.670.1500010.767.9630010.766.8800010.963.31000010.961.91250010.955.21600010.843.1SPL65.663.868.724.179.6N17.814.420.60.641median 11.5median 56.8Delta2.27.335.237.832.934.237.235.631.737.139.64028.327.927.32626.924.326.723.72433.420.941.220.951.919.551.218.560.317.55617.555.915.755.115.865.716.669.515.874.215.47715.574.91673.315.870.41670.816.373.116.372.916.273.516.468.816.455.828.684.41.154.7median 16.4median 65.72.110.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoisePorsche Design Huawei Mate RSHuawei Mate 10 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Mate 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 74% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1 / 2.7 / 3.8 Watt
Carga midlight 5.9 / 11.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone XS
2658 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
28%
17%
41%
39%
20%
35%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.67
33%
0.9
10%
0.95
5%
0.85
15%
0.978 (0.67 - 1.4, n=8)
2%
0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=630)
12%
Idle Average *
2.7
2.5
7%
1.9
30%
1.34
50%
1.15
57%
2.12 (1.15 - 2.7, n=8)
21%
1.723 (0.6 - 6.2, n=629)
36%
Idle Maximum *
3.8
2.51
34%
3.7
3%
1.48
61%
1.23
68%
2.51 (1.23 - 4.3, n=8)
34%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=630)
47%
Load Average *
5.9
4.3
27%
5.3
10%
4
32%
4.12
30%
5.01 (2.47 - 6.5, n=8)
15%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=624)
32%
Load Maximum *
11.5
6.87
40%
7.6
34%
5.13
55%
8.42
27%
8.1 (2.49 - 11.5, n=8)
30%
5.73 (1.2 - 14.2, n=624)
50%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
25h 53min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 34min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 46min
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note 9
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone XS
2658 mAh
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-21%
17%
-10%
24%
Reader / Idle
1553
1347
-13%
1687
9%
1442
-7%
1744
12%
H.264
754
520
-31%
896
19%
745
-1%
929
23%
WiFi v1.3
683
547
-20%
794
16%
570
-17%
818
20%
Load
286
235
-18%
354
24%
245
-14%
398
39%

Pro

+ Design elegante
+ Estável e robusto
+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Muito armazenamento e RAM
+ Desempenho de gama alta
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Diversos acessórios
+ Excelentes câmeras
+ LTE veloz
+ Bom alto-falantes

Contra

- Extremamente caro
- GPS inexato
- O dispositivo esquenta
- Afogamento severo sob uso intenso
- PWM cintilante da tela
- Sem jogos a 60 FPS
- Alto consumo de energia
In review: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany.
In review: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany.

O Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS destaca-se como o smartphone de luxo e é ainda mais caro do que o iPhone XS ou XS Max. O sensor de digitais na tela do Mate RS, a memória abundante e as excelentes câmeras tentam justificar o extravagante preço do dispositivo. No entanto, o dispositivo pega emprestado seu sistema de câmera triplo do P20 Pro, e seu sensor de digitais na tela não tem a precisão de seu sensor tradicional.

O Mate RS parece inteligente com sua carcaça resistente e durável. Da mesma forma, o desempenho está no mesmo nível de outros dispositivos com o Kirin 970. Com isso dito, o dispositivo tem muitas fraquezas para seu preço. Nosso dispositivo de teste fica desconfortavelmente quente sob uso intenso e o afogamento térmico é pesado. O consumo de energia também é alto, o que contribui para uma duração de bateria comparativamente fraca. Além disso, a estabilização de imagem não funciona com vídeos 4K e o GPS é muitas vezes impreciso.

O Porsche Design da Huawei Mate RS não pode satisfazer as expectativas elevadas que o seu preço absurdo define.

Há uma abundância de carros-chefes que são de melhor valor pelo dinheiro do que o Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS. No entanto, poucos têm o mesmo grau de luxo e prestígio que a marca Porsche Design proporciona.

Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS - 10/16/2018 v6
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
92%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
97%
Conectividade
51 / 60 → 84%
Peso
90%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
47 / 63 → 75%
Desempenho da aplicação
68 / 70 → 97%
Temperatura
84%
Ruído
100%
Camera
97%
Médio
81%
90%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
Florian Schmitt, 2018-10-23 (Update: 2018-10-25)