Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Apple iPhone XS

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/03/2018

My preciousss - A Apple manteve sua nomenclatura “S” mesmo após o seu iPhone de aniversário e, consequentemente, seguiu o iPhone X com o iPhone XS. Como nos modelos anteriores “S”, o iPhone XS é mais um refinamento técnico de seu antecessor do que um lançamento fundamental. O iPhone XS deve fazer tudo melhor do que seu antecessor sem se reinventar. Leia a nossa análise do iPhone XS e descubra se o dispositivo consegue atender às expectativas.
Atualização: Adicionou vídeo PWM.

Apple iPhone XS (iPhone Serie)
Processador
Apple A12 Bionic 2.49 GHz
Placa gráfica
Apple A12 Bionic GPU
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Pantalha
5.8 polegadas 2.16:1, 2436 x 1125 pixel 463 PPI, Capacitiva, multitouch de 10 pontos, OLED, HDR10, Dolby Vision, True Tone, Anti-grease coating, 3D Touch, P3 colour space, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs), 512 GB 
, 500.23 GB livre
Conexões
Conexões Audio: Lightning, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Face ID, Barômetro, Bússola Digital, Acelerômetro, Sensor de Proximidade, Sensor de Posição e giroscópio de três eixos, Lightning, eSIM, Galileo, QZSS
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800 e 1,900 MHz; UMTS/HSPA+:850, 900, 1,700/2,100, 1,900 e 2,100 MHz); LTE Cat. 16: Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 66, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 and 46, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 143.6 x 70.9
Bateria
10.13 Wh, 2658 mAh Lítio-Ion, 3,81 Volt, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 20 h
Sistema Operativo
Apple iOS 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Ângulo amplo: f/1.8, 1.4 ?m, focus pixel, six-lens elements, OIS. 12 MP telephoto lens: f/2.4, six-lens elements, OIS, 2 x optical zoom. True Tone Flash, UHD videos at 60 FPS
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix f/2.2, vídeos Full HD a 60 FPS
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Fonte de alimentação, cabo Lightning, Fones, Guia de início rápido, sticker, Ferramenta SIM, 12 Meses Garantia, SAR values: 0.99 W/kg, IP68 rated, Qi wireless charging, fanless
peso
177 g, Suprimento de energia: 46 g
Preço
1549 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

The iPhone X and XS from left to right
The iPhone X and XS from left to right

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼96% 0%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
650 MBit/s ∼96%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 MBit/s ∼94% -2%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
609 MBit/s ∼90% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=273)
197 MBit/s ∼29% -70%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
612 MBit/s ∼95% +4%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
587 MBit/s ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S9
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼80% -12%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
437 MBit/s ∼68% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=273)
193 MBit/s ∼30% -67%
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS test: Apple iPhone XS - Overview
GPS test: Apple iPhone XS - Overview
GPS test: Apple iPhone XS – Around a lake
GPS test: Apple iPhone XS – Around a lake
GPS test: Apple iPhone XS – Loop
GPS test: Apple iPhone XS – Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
2 x optical zoom
2 x optical zoom
5.5 x digital zoom
10 x digital zoom
2 x optical zoom
Main camera
Main camera
Main camera
Main camera
Main camera as shot from a moving bicycle
Main camera
Main camera
2 x optical zoom
10 digital zoom
Main camera
Main camera
Photo of our test chart – taken by the main camera
Photo of our test chart – taken by the main camera
Photo of our test chart – taken by the telephoto lens
Photo of our test chart – taken by the telephoto lens
Test chart in detail - taken by the main camera
Test chart in detail - taken by the telephoto lens
620
cd/m²
628
cd/m²
648
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
651
cd/m²
629
cd/m²
637
cd/m²
659
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 659 cd/m² Médio: 637.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.03 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 639 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.9
Apple iPhone XS
OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Apple iPhone X
Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Samsung Galaxy S9
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8
OnePlus 6
Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.28
LG G7 ThinQ
IPS, 3120x1440, 6.1
HTC U12 Plus
Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6
Screen
-7%
-21%
-3%
-70%
-53%
-159%
-24%
Brightness middle
639
600
-6%
529
-17%
569
-11%
477
-25%
430
-33%
974
52%
395
-38%
Brightness
637
606
-5%
527
-17%
578
-9%
453
-29%
437
-31%
975
53%
402
-37%
Brightness Distribution
94
94
0%
96
2%
95
1%
86
-9%
87
-7%
96
2%
90
-4%
Black Level *
0.33
0.49
0.37
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1
1.2
-20%
1.4
-40%
1.3
-30%
2.1
-110%
2.3
-130%
5.4
-440%
1.6
-60%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.2
3
-36%
4
-82%
2.1
5%
8.2
-273%
4.6
-109%
13.1
-495%
3.4
-55%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.2
1.6
27%
1.6
27%
1.6
27%
1.6
27%
2.4
-9%
5
-127%
1.1
50%
Gamma
1.9 116%
2.23 99%
2.16 102%
2.31 95%
2.28 96%
2.28 96%
2.31 95%
2.14 103%
CCT
6364 102%
6707 97%
6358 102%
6401 102%
6425 101%
6160 106%
7480 87%
6536 99%
Contrast
1445
1988
1068

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8741 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).
AnTuTu v7
MEM (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
12409 Points ∼71%
Apple iPhone X
11107 Points ∼64% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S9
8294 Points ∼48% -33%
HTC U12 Plus
17441 Points ∼100% +41%
LG G7 ThinQ
9149 Points ∼52% -26%
Huawei P20 Pro
13795 Points ∼79% +11%
OnePlus 6
10660 Points ∼61% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
6736 Points ∼39% -46%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (7312 - 12409, n=2)
9861 Points ∼57% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (2797 - 17441, n=142)
6518 Points ∼37% -47%
UX (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
66469 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
50699 Points ∼76% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9
55698 Points ∼84% -16%
HTC U12 Plus
54419 Points ∼82% -18%
LG G7 ThinQ
57962 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei P20 Pro
45397 Points ∼68% -32%
OnePlus 6
57506 Points ∼87% -13%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
50408 Points ∼76% -24%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (59570 - 66469, n=2)
63020 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (6403 - 66469, n=141)
26612 Points ∼40% -60%
GPU (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
148790 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
94618 Points ∼64% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S9
91292 Points ∼61% -39%
HTC U12 Plus
96681 Points ∼65% -35%
LG G7 ThinQ
101265 Points ∼68% -32%
Huawei P20 Pro
77063 Points ∼52% -48%
OnePlus 6
106980 Points ∼72% -28%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
107528 Points ∼72% -28%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (129473 - 148790, n=2)
139132 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2724 - 148790, n=142)
32053 Points ∼22% -78%
CPU (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
120510 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
99873 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S9
88577 Points ∼74% -26%
HTC U12 Plus
87198 Points ∼72% -28%
LG G7 ThinQ
87900 Points ∼73% -27%
Huawei P20 Pro
71704 Points ∼60% -40%
OnePlus 6
91540 Points ∼76% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
81694 Points ∼68% -32%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (106600 - 120510, n=2)
113555 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (7548 - 120510, n=142)
43153 Points ∼36% -64%
Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
348178 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
256297 Points ∼74% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S9
243861 Points ∼70% -30%
HTC U12 Plus
255739 Points ∼73% -27%
LG G7 ThinQ
256276 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei P20 Pro
207959 Points ∼60% -40%
OnePlus 6
266686 Points ∼77% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
246366 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (302955 - 348178, n=2)
325567 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=142)
108543 Points ∼31% -69%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
1711 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone X
1682 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9
1099 Points ∼64% -36%
HTC U12 Plus
1437 Points ∼83% -16%
LG G7 ThinQ
1374 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei P20 Pro
1273 Points ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 6
1386 Points ∼81% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
1400 Points ∼81% -18%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (1711 - 1731, n=2)
1721 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=470)
678 Points ∼39% -60%
Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
15875 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
9248 Points ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6373 Points ∼40% -60%
HTC U12 Plus
7945 Points ∼50% -50%
LG G7 ThinQ
7906 Points ∼50% -50%
Huawei P20 Pro
3725 Points ∼23% -77%
OnePlus 6
7949 Points ∼50% -50%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
7743 Points ∼49% -51%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (15659 - 15875, n=2)
15767 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15875, n=470)
1617 Points ∼10% -90%
Memory (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
4169 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
1219 Points ∼29% -71%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2669 Points ∼64% -36%
HTC U12 Plus
3641 Points ∼87% -13%
LG G7 ThinQ
3744 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei P20 Pro
4050 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 6
3799 Points ∼91% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3704 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (1815 - 4169, n=2)
2992 Points ∼72% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=470)
1164 Points ∼28% -72%
System (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
12202 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
10281 Points ∼84% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S9
6234 Points ∼51% -49%
HTC U12 Plus
7862 Points ∼64% -36%
LG G7 ThinQ
8070 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei P20 Pro
5965 Points ∼49% -51%
OnePlus 6
8228 Points ∼67% -33%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8418 Points ∼69% -31%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (11675 - 12202, n=2)
11939 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=470)
2359 Points ∼19% -81%
Overall (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
6097 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
3737 Points ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3285 Points ∼54% -46%
HTC U12 Plus
4252 Points ∼70% -30%
LG G7 ThinQ
4257 Points ∼70% -30%
Huawei P20 Pro
3271 Points ∼54% -46%
OnePlus 6
4308 Points ∼71% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4288 Points ∼70% -30%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (4895 - 6097, n=2)
5496 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=474)
1180 Points ∼19% -81%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
11598 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
10255 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S9
8786 Points ∼76% -24%
HTC U12 Plus
8812 Points ∼76% -24%
LG G7 ThinQ
9029 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei P20 Pro
6756 Points ∼58% -42%
Apple iPhone 8
10380 Points ∼89% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8522 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (11244 - 11598, n=2)
11421 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 11598, n=217)
4106 Points ∼35% -65%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
4824 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
4265 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3688 Points ∼76% -24%
HTC U12 Plus
2429 Points ∼50% -50%
LG G7 ThinQ
2448 Points ∼51% -49%
Huawei P20 Pro
1922 Points ∼40% -60%
Apple iPhone 8
4162 Points ∼86% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2457 Points ∼51% -49%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (4774 - 4824, n=2)
4799 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=218)
1211 Points ∼25% -75%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
2960 Points ∼82%
Apple iPhone X
2361 Points ∼65% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2486 Points ∼69% -16%
HTC U12 Plus
3197 Points ∼88% +8%
LG G7 ThinQ
3255 Points ∼90% +10%
Huawei P20 Pro
2926 Points ∼81% -1%
OnePlus 6
3432 Points ∼95% +16%
Apple iPhone 8
1989 Points ∼55% -33%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3620 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2960 - 3027, n=2)
2994 Points ∼83% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 3669, n=322)
1571 Points ∼43% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
3712 Points ∼71%
Apple iPhone X
3463 Points ∼66% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3553 Points ∼68% -4%
HTC U12 Plus
3488 Points ∼67% -6%
LG G7 ThinQ
5006 Points ∼96% +35%
Huawei P20 Pro
3017 Points ∼58% -19%
OnePlus 6
5212 Points ∼100% +40%
Apple iPhone 8
2581 Points ∼50% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5190 Points ∼100% +40%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (3712 - 3726, n=2)
3719 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5220, n=322)
1096 Points ∼21% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
3514 Points ∼74%
Apple iPhone X
3138 Points ∼66% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3244 Points ∼69% -8%
HTC U12 Plus
3419 Points ∼72% -3%
LG G7 ThinQ
4471 Points ∼94% +27%
Huawei P20 Pro
2996 Points ∼63% -15%
OnePlus 6
4673 Points ∼99% +33%
Apple iPhone 8
2421 Points ∼51% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4734 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (3514 - 3544, n=2)
3529 Points ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=330)
1049 Points ∼22% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2600 Points ∼75%
HTC U12 Plus
2774 Points ∼80%
LG G7 ThinQ
3150 Points ∼91%
Huawei P20 Pro
2885 Points ∼84%
OnePlus 6
3452 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 8
1774 Points ∼51%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2541 Points ∼74%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2713 - 2713, n=2)
1357 Points ∼39%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 3642, n=353)
1468 Points ∼43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
4569 Points ∼55%
HTC U12 Plus
5637 Points ∼68%
LG G7 ThinQ
7633 Points ∼92%
Huawei P20 Pro
3335 Points ∼40%
OnePlus 6
8252 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8219 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (7055 - 7055, n=2)
3528 Points ∼43%
Average of class Smartphone (104 - 8312, n=353)
1493 Points ∼18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S9
3911 Points ∼62%
HTC U12 Plus
4585 Points ∼73%
LG G7 ThinQ
5799 Points ∼92%
Huawei P20 Pro
3223 Points ∼51%
OnePlus 6
6304 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5492 Points ∼87%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (5205 - 5205, n=2)
2603 Points ∼41%
Average of class Smartphone (127 - 6378, n=361)
1275 Points ∼20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
27400 Points ∼75%
Apple iPhone X
25633 Points ∼70% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9
26851 Points ∼73% -2%
HTC U12 Plus
33810 Points ∼92% +23%
LG G7 ThinQ
27817 Points ∼76% +2%
Huawei P20 Pro
22441 Points ∼61% -18%
OnePlus 6
34191 Points ∼93% +25%
Apple iPhone 8
24131 Points ∼66% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
36762 Points ∼100% +34%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (27400 - 27717, n=2)
27559 Points ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (7095 - 36762, n=508)
12403 Points ∼34% -55%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
160199 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
112489 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9
48433 Points ∼30% -70%
HTC U12 Plus
81726 Points ∼51% -49%
LG G7 ThinQ
80534 Points ∼50% -50%
Huawei P20 Pro
33472 Points ∼21% -79%
OnePlus 6
81269 Points ∼51% -49%
Apple iPhone 8
112424 Points ∼70% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
81502 Points ∼51% -49%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (159735 - 160199, n=2)
159967 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 160199, n=508)
16661 Points ∼10% -90%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
77128 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
64169 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S9
41093 Points ∼53% -47%
HTC U12 Plus
62152 Points ∼80% -19%
LG G7 ThinQ
56669 Points ∼73% -27%
Huawei P20 Pro
30176 Points ∼39% -61%
OnePlus 6
62241 Points ∼80% -19%
Apple iPhone 8
62006 Points ∼80% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
64152 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (77128 - 77599, n=2)
77364 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=509)
14136 Points ∼18% -82%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
251 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
177.4 fps ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S9
144 fps ∼57% -43%
HTC U12 Plus
98 fps ∼39% -61%
LG G7 ThinQ
144 fps ∼57% -43%
Huawei P20 Pro
121 fps ∼48% -52%
OnePlus 6
150 fps ∼60% -40%
Apple iPhone 8
161.3 fps ∼64% -36%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
150 fps ∼60% -40%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (226 - 251, n=2)
239 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=534)
29.1 fps ∼12% -88%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
60 fps ∼50%
Apple iPhone X
59.4 fps ∼50% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9
60 fps ∼50% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
59 fps ∼49% -2%
LG G7 ThinQ
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
60 fps ∼50% 0%
OnePlus 6
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Apple iPhone 8
119.8 fps ∼100% +100%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (60 - 60, n=2)
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=537)
24.1 fps ∼20% -60%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
115 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
88.2 fps ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S9
73 fps ∼63% -37%
HTC U12 Plus
72 fps ∼63% -37%
LG G7 ThinQ
63 fps ∼55% -45%
Huawei P20 Pro
61 fps ∼53% -47%
OnePlus 6
66 fps ∼57% -43%
Apple iPhone 8
70.8 fps ∼62% -38%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
71 fps ∼62% -38%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (107 - 115, n=2)
111 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 115, n=456)
15.5 fps ∼13% -87%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
60 fps ∼52%
Apple iPhone X
58.5 fps ∼51% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9
45 fps ∼39% -25%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼31% -42%
LG G7 ThinQ
41 fps ∼36% -32%
Huawei P20 Pro
54 fps ∼47% -10%
OnePlus 6
58 fps ∼51% -3%
Apple iPhone 8
114.5 fps ∼100% +91%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼51% -3%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (59 - 60, n=2)
59.5 fps ∼52% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=459)
15.2 fps ∼13% -75%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
62 fps ∼94%
Apple iPhone X
48.9 fps ∼74% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S9
46 fps ∼70% -26%
HTC U12 Plus
39 fps ∼59% -37%
LG G7 ThinQ
51 fps ∼78% -18%
Huawei P20 Pro
39 fps ∼59% -37%
OnePlus 6
56 fps ∼85% -10%
Apple iPhone 8
54 fps ∼82% -13%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼88% -6%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (62 - 69.3, n=2)
65.7 fps ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 69.3, n=321)
13.2 fps ∼20% -79%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
48 fps ∼44%
Apple iPhone X
44.1 fps ∼40% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9
24 fps ∼22% -50%
HTC U12 Plus
31 fps ∼28% -35%
LG G7 ThinQ
26 fps ∼24% -46%
Huawei P20 Pro
36 fps ∼33% -25%
OnePlus 6
54 fps ∼49% +13%
Apple iPhone 8
109.7 fps ∼100% +129%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
56 fps ∼51% +17%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (48 - 58.9, n=2)
53.5 fps ∼49% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=323)
13.1 fps ∼12% -73%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
38 fps ∼97%
Apple iPhone X
31.8 fps ∼82% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S9
28 fps ∼72% -26%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼90% -8%
LG G7 ThinQ
33 fps ∼85% -13%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼59% -39%
OnePlus 6
35 fps ∼90% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
35 fps ∼90% -8%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (38 - 40, n=2)
39 fps ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 40, n=251)
9.12 fps ∼23% -76%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
31 fps ∼84%
Apple iPhone X
27.7 fps ∼75% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S9
14 fps ∼38% -55%
HTC U12 Plus
20 fps ∼54% -35%
LG G7 ThinQ
17 fps ∼46% -45%
Huawei P20 Pro
22 fps ∼59% -29%
OnePlus 6
32 fps ∼86% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
37 fps ∼100% +19%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (31 - 31, n=2)
31 fps ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 50, n=254)
8.32 fps ∼22% -73%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
2606 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
1702 Points ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S9
1436 Points ∼55% -45%
LG G7 ThinQ
1176 Points ∼45% -55%
Huawei P20 Pro
887 Points ∼34% -66%
OnePlus 6
1169 Points ∼45% -55%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2407 - 2606, n=2)
2507 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2606, n=69)
666 Points ∼26% -74%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
272.3 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
224 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S9
67.721 Points ∼25% -75%
HTC U12 Plus
87.036 Points ∼32% -68%
LG G7 ThinQ
88.081 Points ∼32% -68%
Huawei P20 Pro
58.255 Points ∼21% -79%
OnePlus 6
87.695 Points ∼32% -68%
Apple iPhone 8
206.7 Points ∼76% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
71.172 Points ∼26% -74%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (272 - 273, n=2)
273 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=391)
35 Points ∼13% -87%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
609.1 ms * ∼5%
Apple iPhone X
718 ms * ∼6% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S9
2077.8 ms * ∼18% -241%
HTC U12 Plus
2409.6 ms * ∼20% -296%
LG G7 ThinQ
2484.1 ms * ∼21% -308%
Huawei P20 Pro
3852.2 ms * ∼33% -532%
OnePlus 6
2445 ms * ∼21% -301%
Apple iPhone 8
730.8 ms * ∼6% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3179 ms * ∼27% -422%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (603 - 609, n=2)
606 ms * ∼5% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=546)
11758 ms * ∼100% -1830%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
43280 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
35255 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S9
15233 Points ∼35% -65%
HTC U12 Plus
16285 Points ∼38% -62%
LG G7 ThinQ
16720 Points ∼39% -61%
Huawei P20 Pro
11584 Points ∼27% -73%
OnePlus 6
17026 Points ∼39% -61%
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points ∼79% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
13360 Points ∼31% -69%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (43114 - 43280, n=2)
43197 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=527)
5243 Points ∼12% -88%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
345 Points ∼96%
Apple iPhone X
354 Points ∼99% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9
163 Points ∼45% -53%
HTC U12 Plus
257 Points ∼72% -26%
LG G7 ThinQ
252 Points ∼70% -27%
Huawei P20 Pro
182 Points ∼51% -47%
OnePlus 6
252 Points ∼70% -27%
Apple iPhone 8
359 Points ∼100% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
211 Points ∼59% -39%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (345 - 347, n=2)
346 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=262)
105 Points ∼29% -70%
WebXPRT 3 - --- (sort by value)
Apple iPhone XS
159 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
130 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S9
63 Points ∼40% -60%
HTC U12 Plus
101 Points ∼64% -36%
LG G7 ThinQ
97 Points ∼61% -39%
Huawei P20 Pro
69 Points ∼43% -57%
OnePlus 6
98 Points ∼62% -38%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
75 Points ∼47% -53%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (155 - 159, n=2)
157 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 159, n=43)
58.7 Points ∼37% -63%

Legend

 
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 39.8 °C39.9 °C36.5 °C 
 37 °C36.5 °C34.9 °C 
 33.1 °C35.1 °C33.3 °C 
Máximo: 39.9 °C
Médio: 36.2 °C
35.6 °C43 °C43.4 °C
34.1 °C38.1 °C39.6 °C
33.2 °C36 °C36 °C
Máximo: 43.4 °C
Médio: 37.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  33.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203030.12530.123.53129.328.44026.9265032.826.66324.824.58020.723.210019.535.712518.644.216021.451.72002552.625017.454.531516.255.440018.458.250015.461.763013.56580013.764.2100013.768.4125014.673.4160014.975.9200014.476.4250014.777.1315014.677.4400014.878.3500014.776.9630014.676.580001575.61000014.966.91250015.159.61600014.951.8SPL27.287.3N0.967.5median 14.9Apple iPhone XSmedian 65Delta1.411.628.62724.92424.624.526.42530.830.823.625.820.222.919.927.817.638.619.150.619.150.317.454.116.959.516.862.215.165.916.56915.670.71573.315.572.115.372.415.773.515.574.515.575.815.476.215.874.61678.215.873.216.169.916.165.517.359.327.986166.7median 16Samsung Galaxy S9median 69.90.68.33033.936.137.63228.229.429.431.541.127.928.722.123.1222421.223.521.528.120.337.718.442.617.351.516.757.81763.116.163.615.869.115.872.715.37015.870.214.9731571.514.770.914.772.51571.315.1761572.815.472.91561.716.34827.683.6157.3median 15.8Sony Xperia XZ2 Premiummedian 69.11.912.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPhone XS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy S9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.12 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.95 / 1.34 / 1.48 Watt
Carga midlight 4 / 5.13 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPhone XS
2658 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
Average Apple A12 Bionic
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-33%
18%
16%
-34%
-4%
-7%
-13%
Idle Minimum *
0.95
1.03
-8%
0.65
32%
0.84
12%
0.67
29%
0.6
37%
0.975 (0.95 - 1, n=2)
-3%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=604)
7%
Idle Average *
1.34
2.4
-79%
0.81
40%
1.54
-15%
2.5
-87%
1
25%
1.37 (1.34 - 1.4, n=2)
-2%
1.717 (0.6 - 6.2, n=603)
-28%
Idle Maximum *
1.48
2.6
-76%
0.92
38%
1.57
-6%
2.51
-70%
1.6
-8%
1.59 (1.48 - 1.7, n=2)
-7%
1.988 (0.74 - 6.6, n=604)
-34%
Load Average *
4
2.96
26%
4.76
-19%
2.47
38%
4.3
-8%
4.3
-8%
4.3 (4 - 4.6, n=2)
-8%
4.02 (0.8 - 10.8, n=598)
-1%
Load Maximum *
5.13
6.6
-29%
5.16
-1%
2.49
51%
6.87
-34%
8.6
-68%
5.92 (5.13 - 6.7, n=2)
-15%
5.68 (1.2 - 14.2, n=598)
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
24h 02min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Safari Mobile 12.0)
9h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 25min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 05min
Apple iPhone XS
2658 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9
3000 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-13%
5%
-22%
24%
-11%
16%
Reader / Idle
1442
1292
-10%
1305
-10%
1182
-18%
1727
20%
1347
-7%
1806
25%
H.264
745
634
-15%
801
8%
609
-18%
784
5%
520
-30%
791
6%
WiFi v1.3
570
564
-1%
742
30%
474
-17%
744
31%
547
-4%
762
34%
Load
245
180
-27%
223
-9%
164
-33%
345
41%
235
-4%
246
0%

Pro

+ Tela OLED brilhante e com cor real
+ Ampla cobertura de frequências de redes móveis
+ Câmera principal impressionante
+ Excelente acabamento
+ Suporte para eSIM (atualização)
+ Resistente à agua e poeira

Contra

- Memória não expansível
- Sem conector para fones
- NFC restrito
- Apenas 12 meses de garantia
- Lente teleobjetiva medíocre
The Apple iPhone XS in review
The Apple iPhone XS in review

O Apple iPhone XS é um exercício de ajuste fino. O dispositivo tem não apenas um SoC mais rápido e econômico do que seu antecessor, mas também possui uma câmera mais dinâmica, opções de armazenamento maiores, uma classificação IP aprimorada e melhorias no SO associadas ao salto para o iOS 12. Acima de tudo, a função de tempo na tela pode ser útil para os pais que desejam restringir o tempo gasto pelos filhos em jogos. O design do dispositivo permanece o mesmo, mas esperamos que com dispositivos “S”. A única mudança estética é que a Apple também vende o XS em uma nova cor dourada, da qual gostamos particularmente.

O Apple iPhone XS oferece muita tecnologia pelo preço de um pequeno MacBook Pro ou um iMac.

O XS tem algumas desvantagens, mas sem falhas reais. A duração da bateria é boa e melhor do que a do iPhone X. A nova série iPhone XS também enterrou o Touch ID, e todos os novos iPhones dependem apenas da identificação facial para segurança biométrica. Além disso, enquanto a Apple melhorou o desempenho da câmera com pouca luz, a lente telefoto é perceptivelmente inferior ao sensor principal da câmera. Gostaríamos que a Apple tivesse usado um melhor sensor de telefoto, já que também criticamos o iPhone X pelo mesmo motivo.

Nossa maior crítica ao iPhone XS é seu preço. O modelo de 64 GB está a partir de 1.149 Euros (~$1.347) com a versão de 512 GB custando ridículos 1.549 Euros (~$1.817). Você precisará ir fundo para comprar o iPhone mais recente, e o XS não traz novos recursos suficientes para justificar a atualização do iPhone X. Por fim, a última palavra sobre o assunto é a de sua carteira.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Apple iPhone XS
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-10- 3 (Update: 2018-10-10)