Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 09/22/2018

Let me entertain you - O Xperia XZ2 Premium é a segunda tentativa da Sony de criar um carro chefe sob sua série Xperia XZ. O XZ2 Premium possui uma tela Ultra-HD, ótimos recursos de áudio, uma configuração brilhante de câmera traseira dupla e muitos outros recursos notáveis também. Descubra nesta análise detalhada para quem este smartphone volumoso é mais adequado.

Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Xperia Serie)
Placa gráfica
Memória
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Pantalha
5.8 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 760 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, multi-touch de 10 pontos, Triluminos-Display for Mobile, IPS LCD, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, HDR, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: USB, Card Reader: Cartões microSD até 400 GB (SDXC, sistemas de arquivo: FAT, FAT32 e exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Barômetro, Bússola Digital, G-Sensor, Sensor de Posição, Sensor de Proximidade, DLNA, Miracast, Wi-Fi Direct, USB On-The-Go (OTG)
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/EDGE: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA +: Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19. LTE Cat. 18: Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 11.9 x 158 x 80
Bateria
3540 mAh Lítio-Ion, Quick Charge 3.0, Qnovo, PD, Wireless Charging (Qi), Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 13 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 26.5 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 550 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 600 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 19 MPix Dual-camera: 19 MP: f/1.8, 25 mm, 1/2.3", 1.22 μm. 12 MP: f/1.6, 1/2.3", 1.55 μm. 5-axis Gyro EIS
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix 13 MP: f/2.0, 22mm, 1/3", 1.12μm, 5-axis Gyro EIS
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, adaptador de conector USB para 3.5 mm, Headphones, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Head - 0.54 W/kg, Body - 0.64 W/kg. IP65/IP68 rated, fanless
peso
236 g
Preço
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

158 mm 80 mm 11.9 mm 236 g158.1 mm 73.8 mm 8.5 mm 189 g156.6 mm 73.9 mm 9.7 mm 188 g157.9 mm 76.7 mm 7.9 mm 175 g156 mm 77 mm 7.9 mm 191 g155.7 mm 75.4 mm 7.75 mm 177 g155 mm 73.88 mm 7.65 mm 174 g143.6 mm 70.9 mm 7.7 mm 174 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
939 MBit/s ∼100% +39%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 MBit/s ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼69% -4%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 MBit/s ∼68% -6%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
609 MBit/s ∼65% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
501 MBit/s ∼53% -26%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
239 MBit/s ∼25% -65%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=396)
220 MBit/s ∼23% -68%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
612 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
494 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
456 MBit/s ∼70% -30%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
437 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
279 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=396)
210 MBit/s ∼32% -68%
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Loop
GPS test: Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium - Overview
GPS test: Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium - Overview
GPS test: Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium – Around a lake
GPS test: Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium – Around a lake
GPS test: Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium – Loop
GPS test: Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium – Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Photo of our test chart
Photo of our test chart
Test chart in detail
408
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
477
cd/m²
453
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 477 cd/m² Médio: 452.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4.14 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 477 cd/m²
Contraste: 1445:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Apple iPhone X
Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
OnePlus 6
Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.28
Google Pixel 2 XL
P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6
HTC U12 Plus
Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6
Screen
-18%
11%
29%
28%
-5%
-18%
7%
Brightness middle
477
578
21%
565
18%
600
26%
569
19%
430
-10%
415
-13%
395
-17%
Brightness
453
568
25%
571
26%
606
34%
578
28%
437
-4%
420
-7%
402
-11%
Brightness Distribution
86
92
7%
96
12%
94
9%
95
10%
87
1%
87
1%
90
5%
Black Level *
0.33
0.62
-88%
0.37
-12%
Contrast
1445
932
-36%
1068
-26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.1
2.8
-33%
2.3
-10%
1.2
43%
1.3
38%
2.3
-10%
2.7
-29%
1.6
24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.2
5.1
38%
4.8
41%
3
63%
2.1
74%
4.6
44%
4.3
48%
3.4
59%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
2.8
-75%
1.9
-19%
1.6
-0%
1.6
-0%
2.4
-50%
3.3
-106%
1.1
31%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.15 102%
2.16 102%
2.23 99%
2.31 95%
2.28 96%
2.36 93%
2.14 103%
CCT
6425 101%
6728 97%
6332 103%
6707 97%
6401 102%
6160 106%
6787 96%
6536 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2381 Hz ≤ 31 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2381 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 31 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2381 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9524 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CalMAN: Optimized Grayscale - Profile: Standard, DCI-P3 target color space
CalMAN: Optimized Grayscale - Profile: Standard, DCI-P3 target color space
CalMAN: Optimized Mixed colors - Profile: Standard, DCI-P3 target color space
CalMAN: Optimized Mixed colors - Profile: Standard, DCI-P3 target color space

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.8 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.3 ms).
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
246366 Points ∼89%
Huawei P20 Pro
207959 Points ∼75% -16%
Apple iPhone X
256297 Points ∼92% +4%
OnePlus 6
266686 Points ∼96% +8%
HTC U12 Plus
255739 Points ∼92% +4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
204654 Points ∼74% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
250577 Points ∼90% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=27)
277434 Points ∼100% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (52607 - 380913, n=259)
127011 Points ∼46% -48%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
226124 Points ∼98%
Huawei P20 Pro
179709 Points ∼78% -21%
Apple iPhone X
197851 Points ∼86% -13%
OnePlus 6
230421 Points ∼100% +2%
HTC U12 Plus
221971 Points ∼96% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
166151 Points ∼72% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
173403 Points ∼75% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
222290 Points ∼96% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=23)
225534 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 274007, n=464)
83941 Points ∼36% -63%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8178 Points ∼95%
Huawei P20 Pro
6982 Points ∼81% -15%
OnePlus 6
8282 Points ∼96% +1%
HTC U12 Plus
8601 Points ∼100% +5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6994 Points ∼81% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6433 Points ∼75% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5319 Points ∼62% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7983 - 9868, n=28)
8069 Points ∼94% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3227 - 11440, n=347)
4930 Points ∼57% -40%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
9858 Points ∼96%
Huawei P20 Pro
8115 Points ∼79% -18%
OnePlus 6
9630 Points ∼94% -2%
HTC U12 Plus
10264 Points ∼100% +4%
Google Pixel 2 XL
8258 Points ∼80% -16%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
7695 Points ∼75% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5822 Points ∼57% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=26)
10123 Points ∼99% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (4096 - 14439, n=515)
5389 Points ∼53% -45%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
1400 Points ∼83%
Huawei P20 Pro
1273 Points ∼76% -9%
Apple iPhone X
1682 Points ∼100% +20%
OnePlus 6
1386 Points ∼82% -1%
HTC U12 Plus
1437 Points ∼85% +3%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1186 Points ∼71% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1239 Points ∼74% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1109 Points ∼66% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=26)
1344 Points ∼80% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=589)
734 Points ∼44% -48%
Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
7743 Points ∼84%
Huawei P20 Pro
3725 Points ∼40% -52%
Apple iPhone X
9248 Points ∼100% +19%
OnePlus 6
7949 Points ∼86% +3%
HTC U12 Plus
7945 Points ∼86% +3%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6142 Points ∼66% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6045 Points ∼65% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6370 Points ∼69% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=26)
7797 Points ∼84% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=589)
1890 Points ∼20% -76%
Memory (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3704 Points ∼91%
Huawei P20 Pro
4050 Points ∼100% +9%
Apple iPhone X
1219 Points ∼30% -67%
OnePlus 6
3799 Points ∼94% +3%
HTC U12 Plus
3641 Points ∼90% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2927 Points ∼72% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3444 Points ∼85% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2625 Points ∼65% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=26)
3649 Points ∼90% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6661, n=589)
1412 Points ∼35% -62%
System (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8418 Points ∼82%
Huawei P20 Pro
5965 Points ∼58% -29%
Apple iPhone X
10281 Points ∼100% +22%
OnePlus 6
8228 Points ∼80% -2%
HTC U12 Plus
7862 Points ∼76% -7%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5914 Points ∼58% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
5857 Points ∼57% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6413 Points ∼62% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4417 - 8613, n=26)
7644 Points ∼74% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=589)
2798 Points ∼27% -67%
Overall (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4288 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
3271 Points ∼76% -24%
Apple iPhone X
3737 Points ∼87% -13%
OnePlus 6
4308 Points ∼100% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
4252 Points ∼99% -1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3351 Points ∼78% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3506 Points ∼81% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3302 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3291 - 4693, n=26)
4111 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=593)
1388 Points ∼32% -68%
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
14417 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
8025 Points ∼56% -44%
HTC U12 Plus
12493 Points ∼87% -13%
Google Pixel 2 XL
7568 Points ∼52% -48%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
7881 Points ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6202 Points ∼43% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=25)
13578 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=298)
4511 Points ∼31% -69%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8522 Points ∼83%
Huawei P20 Pro
6756 Points ∼66% -21%
Apple iPhone X
10255 Points ∼100% +20%
HTC U12 Plus
8812 Points ∼86% +3%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6253 Points ∼61% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
6491 Points ∼63% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
8963 Points ∼87% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=27)
8705 Points ∼85% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1174 - 11598, n=352)
4477 Points ∼44% -47%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2457 Points ∼58%
Huawei P20 Pro
1922 Points ∼45% -22%
Apple iPhone X
4265 Points ∼100% +74%
HTC U12 Plus
2429 Points ∼57% -1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1916 Points ∼45% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1904 Points ∼45% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3776 Points ∼89% +54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=27)
2416 Points ∼57% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (758 - 4824, n=354)
1325 Points ∼31% -46%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3620 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
2926 Points ∼81% -19%
Apple iPhone X
2361 Points ∼65% -35%
OnePlus 6
3432 Points ∼95% -5%
HTC U12 Plus
3197 Points ∼88% -12%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3028 Points ∼84% -16%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1628 Points ∼45% -55%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2469 Points ∼68% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=27)
3217 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (486 - 4262, n=438)
1738 Points ∼48% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5190 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
3017 Points ∼58% -42%
Apple iPhone X
3463 Points ∼66% -33%
OnePlus 6
5212 Points ∼100% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
3488 Points ∼67% -33%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3872 Points ∼74% -25%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3723 Points ∼71% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3582 Points ∼69% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5246, n=27)
4919 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (65 - 6362, n=440)
1280 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4734 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
2996 Points ∼63% -37%
Apple iPhone X
3138 Points ∼66% -34%
OnePlus 6
4673 Points ∼99% -1%
HTC U12 Plus
3419 Points ∼72% -28%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3646 Points ∼77% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
2895 Points ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3256 Points ∼69% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=27)
4388 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5734, n=448)
1225 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2541 Points ∼74%
Huawei P20 Pro
2885 Points ∼84% +14%
OnePlus 6
3452 Points ∼100% +36%
HTC U12 Plus
2774 Points ∼80% +9%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2995 Points ∼87% +18%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
1574 Points ∼46% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2496 Points ∼72% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2124 - 3668, n=27)
3115 Points ∼90% +23%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 4240, n=469)
1644 Points ∼48% -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8219 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
3335 Points ∼40% -59%
OnePlus 6
8252 Points ∼100% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
5637 Points ∼68% -31%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5856 Points ∼71% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
5107 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4637 Points ∼56% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=27)
7763 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 10008, n=469)
1739 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5492 Points ∼87%
Huawei P20 Pro
3223 Points ∼51% -41%
OnePlus 6
6304 Points ∼100% +15%
HTC U12 Plus
4585 Points ∼73% -17%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4831 Points ∼77% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3407 Points ∼54% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3895 Points ∼62% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4363 - 6454, n=27)
5811 Points ∼92% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 7673, n=477)
1493 Points ∼24% -73%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
36762 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
22441 Points ∼61% -39%
Apple iPhone X
25633 Points ∼70% -30%
OnePlus 6
34191 Points ∼93% -7%
HTC U12 Plus
33810 Points ∼92% -8%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20233 Points ∼55% -45%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
13800 Points ∼38% -62%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
26226 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=27)
33322 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (4811 - 45072, n=629)
13516 Points ∼37% -63%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
81502 Points ∼72%
Huawei P20 Pro
33472 Points ∼30% -59%
Apple iPhone X
112489 Points ∼100% +38%
OnePlus 6
81269 Points ∼72% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
81726 Points ∼73% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
54156 Points ∼48% -34%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
52358 Points ∼47% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
46610 Points ∼41% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 85487, n=27)
80548 Points ∼72% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3585 - 162695, n=629)
19557 Points ∼17% -76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
64152 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
30176 Points ∼47% -53%
Apple iPhone X
64169 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 6
62241 Points ∼97% -3%
HTC U12 Plus
62152 Points ∼97% -3%
Google Pixel 2 XL
39456 Points ∼61% -38%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
32302 Points ∼50% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
39745 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=27)
61139 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4164 - 83518, n=630)
16333 Points ∼25% -75%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
150 fps ∼85%
Huawei P20 Pro
121 fps ∼68% -19%
Apple iPhone X
177.4 fps ∼100% +18%
OnePlus 6
150 fps ∼85% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
98 fps ∼55% -35%
Google Pixel 2 XL
112 fps ∼63% -25%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
109 fps ∼61% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
147 fps ∼83% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=28)
142 fps ∼80% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 251, n=658)
34.1 fps ∼19% -77%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
60 fps ∼97%
Huawei P20 Pro
60 fps ∼97% 0%
Apple iPhone X
59.4 fps ∼96% -1%
OnePlus 6
60 fps ∼97% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
59 fps ∼95% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼95% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
60 fps ∼97% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
60 fps ∼97% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=27)
62.1 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 120, n=661)
26.5 fps ∼43% -56%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
71 fps ∼80%
Huawei P20 Pro
61 fps ∼69% -14%
Apple iPhone X
88.2 fps ∼100% +24%
OnePlus 6
66 fps ∼75% -7%
HTC U12 Plus
72 fps ∼82% +1%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼67% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
47 fps ∼53% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
74 fps ∼84% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=27)
73.1 fps ∼83% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (2.7 - 132, n=577)
18.7 fps ∼21% -74%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼99%
Huawei P20 Pro
54 fps ∼92% -7%
Apple iPhone X
58.5 fps ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 6
58 fps ∼99% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼60% -40%
Google Pixel 2 XL
35 fps ∼60% -40%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
46 fps ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
45 fps ∼77% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (33 - 75, n=27)
54.4 fps ∼93% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (5.4 - 115, n=582)
17.4 fps ∼30% -70%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
39 fps ∼67% -33%
Apple iPhone X
48.9 fps ∼84% -16%
OnePlus 6
56 fps ∼97% -3%
HTC U12 Plus
39 fps ∼67% -33%
Google Pixel 2 XL
41 fps ∼71% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
35 fps ∼60% -40%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
47 fps ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=28)
53.9 fps ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88, n=439)
15.5 fps ∼27% -73%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
56 fps ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
36 fps ∼64% -36%
Apple iPhone X
44.1 fps ∼79% -21%
OnePlus 6
54 fps ∼96% -4%
HTC U12 Plus
31 fps ∼55% -45%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20 fps ∼36% -64%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
37 fps ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
24 fps ∼43% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21 - 59, n=27)
45.3 fps ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 110, n=442)
14.8 fps ∼26% -74%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
35 fps ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼66% -34%
Apple iPhone X
31.8 fps ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 6
35 fps ∼100% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼100% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
24 fps ∼69% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
23 fps ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
28 fps ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=27)
33.4 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (0.89 - 54, n=368)
10.4 fps ∼30% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
37 fps ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
22 fps ∼59% -41%
Apple iPhone X
27.7 fps ∼75% -25%
OnePlus 6
32 fps ∼86% -14%
HTC U12 Plus
20 fps ∼54% -46%
Google Pixel 2 XL
13 fps ∼35% -65%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
25 fps ∼68% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
14 fps ∼38% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 37, n=27)
27.7 fps ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 58, n=372)
9.41 fps ∼25% -75%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
25.93 fps ∼69%
Google Pixel 2 XL
37.71 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
35.83 fps ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72)
12.1 fps ∼32%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P20 Pro
887 Points ∼52%
Apple iPhone X
1702 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
1169 Points ∼69%
Google Pixel 2 XL
853 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1481 Points ∼87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1169 - 1201, n=5)
1179 Points ∼69%
Average of class Smartphone (35 - 2754, n=97)
704 Points ∼41%

Legend

 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1)
224 Points ∼100% +215%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
87.695 Points ∼39% +23%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
87.036 Points ∼39% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (0 - 90.9, n=27)
74.3 Points ∼33% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
71.172 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.59 Points ∼31% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
64.709 Points ∼29% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
61.5 Points ∼27% -14%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
58.255 Points ∼26% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 273, n=494)
38.1 Points ∼17% -46%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
35255 Points ∼100% +164%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
17026 Points ∼48% +27%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
16285 Points ∼46% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28)
15153 Points ∼43% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points ∼42% +10%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
13360 Points ∼38%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
11584 Points ∼33% -13%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
11308 Points ∼32% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
10672 Points ∼30% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=650)
6112 Points ∼17% -54%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=670)
10908 ms * ∼100% -243%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
3852.2 ms * ∼35% -21%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
3434.1 ms * ∼31% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
3199 ms * ∼29% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
3179 ms * ∼29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28)
2905 ms * ∼27% +9%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
2445 ms * ∼22% +23%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
2409.6 ms * ∼22% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2059.7 ms * ∼19% +35%
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
718 ms * ∼7% +77%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0)
354 Points ∼100% +68%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
257 Points ∼73% +22%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
252 Points ∼71% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (245 - 291, n=24)
236 Points ∼67% +12%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
211 Points ∼60%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
194 Points ∼55% -8%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
182 Points ∼51% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points ∼46% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)
149 Points ∼42% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (66 - 362, n=326)
119 Points ∼34% -44%

* ... smaller is better

Sony Xperia XZ2 PremiumSony Xperia XZ PremiumSamsung Galaxy S9 PlusOnePlus 6Google Pixel 2 XLHuawei P20 ProAverage 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-7%
47%
4%
6%
168%
54%
-6%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
30.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
33.31 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
10%
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
122%
50.8 (17.1 - 71.9, n=26)
68%
48.3 (9.5 - 87.1, n=393)
60%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
34.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
36.79 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
8%
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
132%
67.1 (18 - 86.6, n=26)
96%
66.4 (8.1 - 96.5, n=393)
94%
Random Write 4KB
21.75
17.2
-21%
22.74
5%
21.8
0%
17.84
-18%
160.49
638%
53.8 (8.77 - 165, n=35)
147%
19.3 (0.14 - 250, n=700)
-11%
Random Read 4KB
135.99
74.1
-46%
129.68
-5%
137
1%
170.55
25%
144.33
6%
134 (78.2 - 173, n=35)
-1%
43.8 (1.59 - 175, n=700)
-68%
Sequential Write 256KB
170.98
194
13%
204.94
20%
201.4
18%
195.26
14%
196.69
15%
198 (133 - 388, n=35)
16%
90.2 (2.99 - 392, n=700)
-47%
Sequential Read 256KB
748.59
687
-8%
818.69
9%
725.6
-3%
760.14
2%
831.82
11%
725 (529 - 895, n=35)
-3%
255 (12.1 - 1468, n=700)
-66%
PUBG Mobile
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 HD40 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 High Quality30 fps
 Standard / low30 fps
Carga Máxima
 38.9 °C39.5 °C35.8 °C 
 38.3 °C38.7 °C37.6 °C 
 38.2 °C37.6 °C36.9 °C 
Máximo: 39.5 °C
Médio: 37.9 °C
32.1 °C34.5 °C36 °C
31.8 °C32.9 °C36 °C
31.5 °C32.9 °C34.7 °C
Máximo: 36 °C
Médio: 33.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  27.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203033.92536.137.6313228.24029.429.45031.541.16327.928.78022.123.1100222412521.223.516021.528.120020.337.725018.442.631517.351.540016.757.85001763.163016.163.680015.869.1100015.872.7125015.370160015.870.2200014.97325001571.5315014.770.9400014.772.550001571.3630015.17680001572.81000015.472.9125001561.71600016.348SPL27.683.6N157.3median 15.8median 69.1Delta1.912.535.246.432.941.937.237.731.736.839.640.528.330.327.330.326.928.126.732.2244520.952.120.957.119.558.518.562.617.570.917.574.715.778.515.876.916.676.215.873.415.473.615.575.51679.915.880.11676.516.37416.374.916.271.416.458.216.44228.688.41.176.2median 16.4median 73.42.110.528.628.224.928.424.621.226.419.330.829.123.624.620.223.319.927.217.638.919.150.619.149.917.454.316.961.516.860.915.163.616.567.915.6701570.615.572.115.371.715.773.515.573.215.576.715.476.115.873.71677.415.872.916.169.816.164.817.357.227.985.6164.4median 16median 69.80.68.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSony Xperia XZ2 PremiumGoogle Pixel 2 XLSamsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.67 / 2.5 / 2.51 Watt
Carga midlight 4.3 / 6.87 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3230 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-5%
31%
-4%
16%
-17%
-9%
27%
-6%
8%
Idle Minimum *
0.67
0.62
7%
0.84
-25%
1.03
-54%
0.6
10%
0.77
-15%
1.28
-91%
0.68
-1%
0.862 (0.42 - 1.8, n=26)
-29%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=727)
-31%
Idle Average *
2.5
2.44
2%
1.54
38%
2.4
4%
1
60%
2.18
13%
1.87
25%
0.95
62%
1.728 (0.67 - 2.9, n=26)
31%
1.736 (0.6 - 6.2, n=726)
31%
Idle Maximum *
2.51
2.59
-3%
1.57
37%
2.6
-4%
1.6
36%
2.21
12%
1.89
25%
1.09
57%
2.07 (0.87 - 3.5, n=26)
18%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=727)
20%
Load Average *
4.3
4.94
-15%
2.47
43%
2.96
31%
4.3
-0%
6.25
-45%
3.73
13%
4.58
-7%
4.87 (3.56 - 7.41, n=26)
-13%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=721)
5%
Load Maximum *
6.87
7.91
-15%
2.49
64%
6.6
4%
8.6
-25%
10.16
-48%
8.08
-18%
5.16
25%
9.27 (6.2 - 12.3, n=26)
-35%
5.87 (1.2 - 14.2, n=721)
15%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
22h 27min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 68)
9h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 40min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 55min
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
3230 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Battery Runtime
41%
-1%
33%
-3%
23%
28%
7%
Reader / Idle
1347
1727
28%
1292
-4%
1806
34%
1452
8%
1706
27%
1754
30%
1343
0%
H.264
520
784
51%
634
22%
791
52%
464
-11%
672
29%
802
54%
674
30%
WiFi v1.3
547
744
36%
564
3%
762
39%
507
-7%
581
6%
695
27%
521
-5%
Load
235
345
47%
180
-23%
246
5%
230
-2%
302
29%
236
0%
237
1%

Pro

+ Tela UHD com cores reais com HDR
+ SoC veloz
+ Carregamento sem fio
+ Resistente à poeira e água (IP65/68)
+ Memória expansível
+ Wi-Fi rápido
+ Carcaça sólida e bem acabada
+ Sistema sólido de câmera dupla traseira

Contra

- Desempenho médio do GPS
- A tela poderia ser mais brilhante
- Desempenho lento do leitor de cartões microSD
- Durações de bateria piores do que o antecessor
- Pesado
- Sem conector de 3,5 mm
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium in review. Test device courtesy of Sony Germany.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium in review. Test device courtesy of Sony Germany.

O Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium é um verdadeiro peso-pesado, o que é verdade tanto fisicamente quanto em relação ao seu hardware. Nossa única reclamação de hardware é a decisão da Sony de omitir um conector de fone de ouvido.

A tela UHD deve atrair os viciados em streaming que desejam aproveitar seu conteúdo na resolução mais alta suportada. É estúpido que o prometido suporte para UHD da Netflix e da Amazon não funcione em um dos poucos dispositivos prontos para 4K, mas não temos certeza de quem é o culpado aqui. As vibrações dinâmicas são certamente um recurso interessante, mas a decisão da Sony de restringir seu uso apenas a músicas e vídeos torna o recurso bastante artimanhoso. Além disso, nosso dispositivo de teste tende a vibrar ao longo de superfícies planas ao tocar música com a vibração dinâmica ativada.

O Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium segue a atualização de design do XZ2 e consegue entregar uma experiência de carro chefe, embora com algumas desvantagens. A tela UHD deve revelar-se um reviravoltas para os entusiastas.

A grande tela 16: 9 e o poderoso SoC devem agradar a maioria dos jogadores de smartphones, enquanto os entusiastas do áudio apreciarão o áudio de alta resolução e o suporte a codecs populares que complementam os recursos de entretenimento do XZ2 Premium. O dispositivo também possui boas câmeras, embora elas não correspondam aos melhores smartphones atualmente no mercado. Da mesma forma, as gravações de vídeo parecem boas, mas o EIS em UHD deve ser mais eficaz.

Uma grande desvantagem do XZ2 Premium é a duração da bateria. Nosso dispositivo de teste tem pior duração de bateria do que seu antecessor, apesar de ter uma bateria maior. Igualmente, o XZ2 Premium fica aquém dos tempos de duração alcançados pelos nossos dispositivos de comparação. Nós suspeitamos que essas durações fracas poderiam ser corrigidas com atualizações de software. O Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium pode ser um excelente companheiro diário, se você puder perdoar o seu grande formato e a duração da bateria abaixo da média.

Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium - 09/14/2018 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
92%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 91%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
49 / 60 → 82%
Peso
87%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
69 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
74 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 81%
Camera
79%
Médio
81%
88%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-09-22 (Update: 2018-09-30)