Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016)

Andreas Osthoff (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/28/2016

Caro. A Samsung lança uma atualização 2016 do seu aparelho de nível de entrada Galaxy J1, mas o preço foi incrementado. A Samsung, mais uma vez não é muito generosa em termos de recursos. Será que o smartphone justifica o preço adicional, ou será que você deve dar uma olhada nos rivais?

Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 (Galaxy J Serie)
Processador
Samsung Exynos 3475 Quad
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T720
Memória
1024 MB 
Pantalha
4.5 polegadas , 800x480 pixel 207 PPI, capacitiva, 5 ponto tácteis, SAMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB 
, 4.3 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm Audio, Card Reader: microSD até 128 GB, NFC, Sensores: acelerômetro, proximidade, posição, WiFi-Direct, Head-SAR: 0.994 W/kg, SAR Body: 1.17 W/kg
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, 2G GSM (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G UMTS (850/900/1900/2100 MHz), 4G LTE (800/850/900/1800/2100/2600 MHz), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.9 x 132.6 x 69.3
Bateria
7.9 Wh, 2050 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 12 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.2, AF, flash, [email protected], 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix (foco fixo)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Mono na traseira, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, PSU, bateria, cabo USB, fones, guia de início rápido, informação de garantia, Smart Manager, Galaxy Apps, my Galaxy, Google Apps, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
131 g, Suprimento de energia: 33 g
Preço
159 Euro

 

Samsung Galaxy J1: overview
Samsung Galaxy J1: overview
Samsung Galaxy J1: crossing
Samsung Galaxy J1: crossing
Samsung Galaxy J1: turning point
Samsung Galaxy J1: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: crossing
Garmin Edge 500: crossing
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
317
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 319 cd/m² Médio: 303.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.28 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 301 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.02
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
4.5, 800x480, SAMOLED
LG K7
5, 854x480, IPS
Honor 4X
5.5, 1280x720, IPS
Microsoft Lumia 650
5, 1280x720, OLED
Samsung Galaxy J5
5, 1280x720, Super AMOLED
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
5, 1280x720, Super AMOLED
Honor 5C
5.2, 1920x1080, IPS
Samsung Galaxy J1
4.3, 800x480, TFT
Screen
-164%
-31%
23%
-12%
-27%
-39%
-47%
Brightness
303
300
-1%
514
70%
353
17%
353
17%
299
-1%
498
64%
364
20%
Brightness Distribution
91
93
2%
89
-2%
92
1%
93
2%
96
5%
93
2%
95
4%
Black Level *
0.26
0.62
0.49
0.63
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.9
12
-145%
6.36
-30%
2.6
47%
5.22
-7%
5.8
-18%
6.2
-27%
5.99
-22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
15.3
-512%
6.51
-160%
1.8
28%
3.96
-58%
4.8
-92%
7.4
-196%
7.28
-191%
Gamma
2.02 119%
2.15 112%
2.17 111%
2.06 117%
2.08 115%
1.84 130%
2.28 105%
2.59 93%
CCT
6314 103%
22440 29%
8044 81%
6542 99%
7308 89%
6252 104%
8664 75%
7949 82%
Contrast
1185
842
1051
587

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 238.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6577 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
1280 Points ∼100% +9%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
1171 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy J1
SC8830, Mali-400 MP2, 512
567 Points ∼44% -52%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
405 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
350 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy J1
SC8830, Mali-400 MP2, 512
312 Points ∼77% -11%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
3914 Points ∼100%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
2151 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
1425 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
1403 Points ∼36%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
1171 Points ∼30%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
906 Points ∼100%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
541 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
473 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
464 Points ∼51%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
350 Points ∼39%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
53143 Points ∼100% +176%
Microsoft Lumia 650
212 APQ8009, Adreno 304, 1024
31844 Points ∼60% +65%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
27232 Points ∼51% +41%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
24748 Points ∼47% +29%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
23997 Points ∼45% +25%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
19253 Points ∼36%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
707 Points ∼100% +31%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
615 Points ∼87% +14%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
592 Points ∼84% +10%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
569 Points ∼80% +6%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
551 Points ∼78% +2%
Microsoft Lumia 650
212 APQ8009, Adreno 304, 1024
546 Points ∼77% +1%
Samsung Galaxy J1
SC8830, Mali-400 MP2, 512
541 Points ∼77% 0%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
541 Points ∼77% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
539 Points ∼76%
Graphics
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
814 Points ∼100% +309%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
314 Points ∼39% +58%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
312 Points ∼38% +57%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
268 Points ∼33% +35%
Microsoft Lumia 650
212 APQ8009, Adreno 304, 1024
207 Points ∼25% +4%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
199 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
158 Points ∼19% -21%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
145 Points ∼18% -27%
Samsung Galaxy J1
SC8830, Mali-400 MP2, 512
65 Points ∼8% -67%
Memory
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
1504 Points ∼100% +175%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
643 Points ∼43% +18%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
597 Points ∼40% +9%
Microsoft Lumia 650
212 APQ8009, Adreno 304, 1024
575 Points ∼38% +5%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
546 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
399 Points ∼27% -27%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
315 Points ∼21% -42%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
189 Points ∼13% -65%
Samsung Galaxy J1
SC8830, Mali-400 MP2, 512
185 Points ∼12% -66%
System
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
2600 Points ∼100% +155%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
1355 Points ∼52% +33%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
1134 Points ∼44% +11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
1060 Points ∼41% +4%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
1058 Points ∼41% +4%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
1019 Points ∼39%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
1011 Points ∼39% -1%
Microsoft Lumia 650
212 APQ8009, Adreno 304, 1024
552 Points ∼21% -46%
Samsung Galaxy J1
SC8830, Mali-400 MP2, 512
551 Points ∼21% -46%
Overall
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
1225 Points ∼100% +148%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
598 Points ∼49% +21%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
585 Points ∼48% +18%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
534 Points ∼44% +8%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
494 Points ∼40%
Microsoft Lumia 650
212 APQ8009, Adreno 304, 1024
435 Points ∼36% -12%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
423 Points ∼35% -14%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
350 Points ∼29% -29%
Samsung Galaxy J1
SC8830, Mali-400 MP2, 512
245 Points ∼20% -50%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 battery life
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
473 min ∼100%
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
2913 Points ∼100%
Work performance score
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
5120 Points ∼100% +58%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
4126 Points ∼81% +27%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
3966 Points ∼77% +22%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
3350 Points ∼65% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
3241 Points ∼63%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2553 Points ∼50% -21%
Samsung Galaxy J1
SC8830, Mali-400 MP2, 512
1998 Points ∼39% -38%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
19 fps ∼100% +245%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
9.2 fps ∼48% +67%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
5.5 fps ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
5.2 fps ∼27% -5%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
4.6 fps ∼24% -16%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
4.3 fps ∼23% -22%
Microsoft Lumia 650
212 APQ8009, Adreno 304, 1024
3.25 fps ∼17% -41%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
20 fps ∼100% +33%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
15 fps ∼75% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
15 fps ∼75%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
10 fps ∼50% -33%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
9.7 fps ∼49% -35%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
7.6 fps ∼38% -49%
Microsoft Lumia 650
212 APQ8009, Adreno 304, 1024
5.67 fps ∼28% -62%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
7.9 fps ∼100% +316%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
1.9 fps ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
1.8 fps ∼23% -5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
1.8 fps ∼23% -5%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
0 fps ∼0% -100%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
8.4 fps ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
7.9 fps ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
3.8 fps ∼45% -52%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
3.8 fps ∼45% -52%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
0 fps ∼0% -100%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
1440 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
303 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
367 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
1418 Points ∼100%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
317 Points ∼100%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
383 Points ∼100%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
1418 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
734 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
709 Points ∼50%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
480 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
42 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
42 Points ∼9%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
563 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
53 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
53 Points ∼9%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
Points ∼0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
13588 Points ∼100% +58%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
9079 Points ∼67% +6%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
9022 Points ∼66% +5%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
8913 Points ∼66% +4%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
8594 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
8322 Points ∼61% -3%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
6861 Points ∼50% -20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
11319 Points ∼100% +258%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
4997 Points ∼44% +58%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
3838 Points ∼34% +21%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
3782 Points ∼33% +20%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
3162 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
3037 Points ∼27% -4%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2473 Points ∼22% -22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
11755 Points ∼100% +220%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
5318 Points ∼45% +45%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
4400 Points ∼37% +20%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
4345 Points ∼37% +18%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
3679 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
3535 Points ∼30% -4%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2946 Points ∼25% -20%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
8732 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
8471 Points ∼97% +12%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
7841 Points ∼90% +4%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
7773 Points ∼89% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
7558 Points ∼87%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
6434 Points ∼74% -15%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
3411 Points ∼100% +75%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
2193 Points ∼64% +12%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
2191 Points ∼64% +12%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
2000 Points ∼59% +2%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
1953 Points ∼57%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
1661 Points ∼49% -15%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
3809 Points ∼100% +63%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
2631 Points ∼69% +13%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
2623 Points ∼69% +12%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
2397 Points ∼63% +3%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
2338 Points ∼61%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2013 Points ∼53% -14%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
8697 Points ∼100% +13%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
8542 Points ∼98% +11%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
7751 Points ∼89% +1%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
7686 Points ∼88% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
7670 Points ∼88%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
6531 Points ∼75% -15%
Samsung Galaxy J1
SC8830, Mali-400 MP2, 512
3859 Points ∼44% -50%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
5562 Points ∼100% +37%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
4740 Points ∼85% +17%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
4692 Points ∼84% +16%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
4050 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
3453 Points ∼62% -15%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2499 Points ∼45% -38%
Samsung Galaxy J1
SC8830, Mali-400 MP2, 512
1957 Points ∼35% -52%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
5752 Points ∼100% +27%
Samsung Galaxy J5 2016
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 2048
5260 Points ∼91% +16%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
5227 Points ∼91% +16%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
4525 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
3938 Points ∼68% -13%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2940 Points ∼51% -35%
Samsung Galaxy J1
SC8830, Mali-400 MP2, 512
2213 Points ∼38% -51%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
4188 Points ∼100% +80%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
3038 Points ∼73% +31%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
2842 Points ∼68% +22%
Microsoft Lumia 650
212 APQ8009, Adreno 304, 1024
2574 Points ∼61% +11%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
2323 Points ∼55%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
2280 Points ∼54% -2%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
1857 Points ∼44% -20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy J1
SC8830, Mali-400 MP2, 512
19283.7 ms * ∼100% -17%
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 2048
18885.1 ms * ∼98% -15%
Microsoft Lumia 650
212 APQ8009, Adreno 304, 1024
18237.4 ms * ∼95% -11%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
16486 ms * ∼85%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
14579.1 ms * ∼76% +12%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
14074 ms * ∼73% +15%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
13701.5 ms * ∼71% +17%
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
9111.2 ms * ∼47% +45%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
73 Points ∼100% +70%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
52 Points ∼71% +21%
Microsoft Lumia 650
212 APQ8009, Adreno 304, 1024
52 Points ∼71% +21%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
43 Points ∼59%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
39 Points ∼53% -9%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
39 Points ∼53% -9%
Samsung Galaxy J1
SC8830, Mali-400 MP2, 512
28 Points ∼38% -35%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 2048
27.934 Points ∼100% +86%
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1536
18.424 Points ∼66% +23%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1536
16.2 Points ∼58% +8%
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 1024
15 Points ∼54%
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 1024
14.369 Points ∼51% -4%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
8 GB eMMC Flash
LG K7
8 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 4X
8 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J5
8 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
8 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 5C
16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy J1
4 GB Flash
AndroBench 3-5
-42%
-30%
-8%
-32%
66%
-60%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
43.56
19.27
-56%
18.7
-57%
24.21
-44%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
64.43
37.84
-41%
20.82
-68%
51.93
-19%
Random Write 4KB
9.92
5.33
-46%
3.83
-61%
7.2
-27%
9.43
-5%
15.7
58%
1.5
-85%
Random Read 4KB
17.27
15.63
-9%
19.47
13%
19.25
11%
16.82
-3%
61.7
257%
13.76
-20%
Sequential Write 256KB
40.91
8.2
-80%
19.02
-54%
39.4
-4%
41.4
1%
75.5
85%
11.3
-72%
Sequential Read 256KB
164.14
128.21
-22%
136.13
-17%
145.47
-11%
64.42
-61%
263
60%
59.72
-64%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high12 fps
 very low16 fps
Real Racing 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 low15 fps
Carga Máxima
 30.5 °C32.3 °C33.3 °C 
 30.9 °C33.1 °C33.3 °C 
 30.6 °C32.9 °C32.8 °C 
Máximo: 33.3 °C
Médio: 32.2 °C
31.1 °C31.9 °C30.8 °C
31.5 °C31.7 °C31.6 °C
31.6 °C32 °C31.5 °C
Máximo: 32 °C
Médio: 31.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  31.3 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.06 / 0.22 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.44 / 1.1 / 1.17 Watt
Carga midlight 2.31 / 3.04 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
3475 Quad, Mali-T720, 800x480, 4.5
LG K7
MT6580M, Mali-400 MP2, 854x480, 5
Honor 4X
Kirin 620, Mali-450 MP4, 1280x720, 5.5
Microsoft Lumia 650
212 APQ8009, Adreno 304, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy J5
410 MSM8916, Adreno 306, 1280x720, 5
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
SC9830A, Mali-400 MP2, 1280x720, 5
Honor 5C
Kirin 650, Mali-T830 MP2, 1920x1080, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy J1
SC8830, Mali-400 MP2, 800x480, 4.3
Power Consumption
-27%
-69%
-34%
-111%
-26%
-79%
-34%
Idle Minimum *
0.44
0.61
-39%
0.8
-82%
0.7
-59%
1.5
-241%
0.96
-118%
0.89
-102%
0.8
-82%
Idle Average *
1.1
1.36
-24%
1.7
-55%
1.1
-0%
2.2
-100%
1.14
-4%
2.07
-88%
1.5
-36%
Idle Maximum *
1.17
1.38
-18%
2
-71%
1.18
-1%
2.4
-105%
1.23
-5%
2.15
-84%
1.7
-45%
Load Average *
2.31
3.11
-35%
3.6
-56%
4.04
-75%
3.5
-52%
2.45
-6%
3.46
-50%
2.2
5%
Load Maximum *
3.04
3.59
-18%
5.5
-81%
4.07
-34%
4.8
-58%
2.92
4%
5.18
-70%
3.4
-12%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
20h 42min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3 (Chrome 38)
8h 55min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 18min
Carga (máximo brilho)
6h 55min
Samsung Galaxy J1 2016
7.9 Wh, 2050 mAh
LG K7
8.1 Wh, 2125 mAh
Honor 4X
 Wh,  mAh
Microsoft Lumia 650
7.6 Wh, 2000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5
10 Wh,  mAh
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016
9.88 Wh, 2600 mAh
Honor 5C
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J1
7 Wh,  mAh
Battery Runtime
-30%
-23%
-36%
-8%
-6%
-23%
-8%
Reader / Idle
1242
1000
-19%
1105
-11%
910
-27%
1292
4%
1212
-2%
997
-20%
1262
2%
H.264
738
311
-58%
373
-49%
510
-31%
657
-11%
590
-20%
602
-18%
512
-31%
WiFi v1.3
535
453
-15%
569
6%
345
-36%
495
-7%
502
-6%
584
9%
648
21%
Load
415
299
-28%
267
-36%
213
-49%
350
-16%
433
4%
156
-62%
321
-23%

Pro

+ Chassi sólido e compacto
+ Boa tela SAMOLED
+ Bateria substituível
+ Leitor SD
+ Longas durações da bateria
+ LTE e NFC

Contra

- Baixo desempenho, no geral
- Às vezes fica lento
- Sem sensor de luz ambiente
- Botões Android não iluminados
- Baixa resolução de tela
- As câmeras não foram melhoradas
- Apenas Android 5.1.1
- Sem WLAN 5 GHz
In review: Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016). Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.
In review: Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016). Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

O modelo Samsung Galaxy J1 do ano 2016 deixou uma impressão um pouco confusa. A Samsung melhorou o a aparelho de nível de entrada em alguns pontos. Isto evidentemente inclui a tela SAMOLED, que consegue convencer em todas as áreas exceto pela baixa resolução. A Samsung também mexeu no desempenho e nos recursos, porque desta vez recebemos um SoC quad-core, LTE, e inclusive NFC.

O Galaxy J1 ainda é um aparelho de nível de entrada, que está, entre outros, também confirmado pelo equipamento da câmera. A Samsung ainda usa os módulos do predecessor, provavelmente para manter sua distância com o Galaxy J3. Isto nos traz para o maior problema do Galaxy J1, o preço. O preço sugerido de 159 Euros (~$ 174) é muito alto, em nossa opinião. O atual preço de cerca de 130-140 Euros (~$142-~$153), mas o maior Galaxy J3 com uma tela maior, maior resolução, mais recursos, e melhores câmeras é apenas um par de Euros mais caro. 

A Samsung melhorou o Galaxy J1 (2016) em algumas áreas importantes, mas evidentemente ainda é um aparelho de nível de entrada. O maior problema é o Galaxy J3 da própria Samsung, que atualmente é mais caro e, portanto, oferece uma razão de preço-desempenho melhor.

Além das câmeras, você também deve se comprometer em termos de desempenho e equipamento de memória. O Galaxy J1 ainda não suporta WLAN 5 GHz. Os aspectos positivos obviamente são a longa duração da bateria e o chassi compacto e sólido. Você não pode errar com o modelo 2016 em geral, mas nós ainda esperaríamos para a compra até que o preço tenha baixado um pouco.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Samsung Galaxy J1 2016 - 07/18/2016 v5.1
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento
83%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
83%
Conectividade
35 / 60 → 58%
Peso
94%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
6 / 63 → 9%
Desempenho da aplicação
27 / 70 → 38%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
50 / 91 → 55%
Camera
53%
Médio
67%
80%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016)
Andreas Osthoff, 2016-07-28 (Update: 2016-07-31)