Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone TP-Link Neffos C9

Mike Wobker, Eric Ferrari-Herrmann, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/24/2019

A large, budget smartphone A TP-Link expandiu sua série C com o Neffos C9, um dispositivo com tela de 5,99 polegadas e um SoC MediaTek. Não espere um desempenho milagroso ou capacidades de câmera para o C9, já que ele é voltado para aqueles que querem um smartphone grande e sem frescuras. Leia mais para descobrir como o Neffos C9 se desempenha em nossos testes e se ele pode encarar seus contemporâneos.

TP-Link Neffos C9 (Neffos Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
PowerVR GE8100
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5.99 polegadas 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 269 PPI, Capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 128 GB. Suporte para arquivos de sistema FAT e FAT32, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, bússola, sensor de proximidade
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G/GSM: Bands, 2, 3, 5, 84G. 3G UMTS/WCDMA: Bands 1, 5, 8. LTE/FDD: Bands 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.45 x 158.7 x 76.6
Bateria
3840 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix PDAF
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: Virtual, Carregador USB, cabo micro USB, NFUI 8.0, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Body – 0.864 W/kg, Head - 0.169 W/kg
peso
170 g, Suprimento de energia: 60 g
Preço
140 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

TP-Link Neffos C9
TP-Link Neffos C9
TP-Link Neffos C9
TP-Link Neffos C9

Size Comparison

158.7 mm 76.6 mm 8.45 mm 170 g153.6 mm 77.6 mm 9.7 mm 174 g153.6 mm 73.1 mm 8.5 mm 160 g149.5 mm 71 mm 9.3 mm 174 g147.3 mm 71.5 mm 7.99 mm 149 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=416)
224 MBit/s ∼100% +256%
Gigaset GS100
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash
97.9 MBit/s ∼44% +55%
TP-Link Neffos C9
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
63 (min: 51, max: 61) MBit/s ∼28%
Wiko View 2 Go
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.7 (min: 53, max: 57) MBit/s ∼24% -13%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 (min: 29, max: 54) MBit/s ∼22% -23%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
34.8 (min: 27, max: 44) MBit/s ∼16% -45%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=416)
213 MBit/s ∼100% +302%
Gigaset GS100
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash
99.6 MBit/s ∼47% +88%
Wiko View 2 Go
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53 (min: 36, max: 58) MBit/s ∼25% 0%
TP-Link Neffos C9
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 16 GB eMMC Flash
53 (min: 48, max: 57) MBit/s ∼25%
Nokia 2.1
Adreno 308, 425, 8 GB eMMC Flash
52.7 (min: 27, max: 58) MBit/s ∼25% -1%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11.6 (min: 2, max: 36) MBit/s ∼5% -78%
010203040506070Tooltip
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø58.9 (51-61)
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø34.8 (27-44)
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø54.6 (53-57)
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø48.2 (29-54)
TP-Link Neffos C9 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø52.9 (48-57)
Motorola Moto G7 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø11.9 (2-36)
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø53.2 (36-58)
Nokia 2.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø51.7 (27-58)
GPS test: TP-Link Neffos C9 – Overview
GPS test: TP-Link Neffos C9 – Overview
GPS test: TP-Link Neffos C9 – Bridge
GPS test: TP-Link Neffos C9 – Bridge
GPS test: TP-Link Neffos C9 - Loop
GPS test: TP-Link Neffos C9 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
451
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
472
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 472 cd/m² Médio: 442.1 cd/m² Minimum: 9.7 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 447 cd/m²
Contraste: 745:1 (Preto: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.63 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
92.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.229
TP-Link Neffos C9
IPS, 1440x720, 5.99
Motorola Moto G7 Play
IPS, 1512x720, 5.7
Wiko View 2 Go
IPS, 1512x720, 5.93
Nokia 2.1
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Gigaset GS100
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Screen
2%
13%
-8%
-34%
Brightness middle
447
479
7%
465
4%
338
-24%
442
-1%
Brightness
442
481
9%
462
5%
327
-26%
446
1%
Brightness Distribution
86
94
9%
84
-2%
82
-5%
86
0%
Black Level *
0.6
0.37
38%
0.32
47%
0.27
55%
0.35
42%
Contrast
745
1295
74%
1453
95%
1252
68%
1263
70%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.63
4.91
-35%
4.76
-31%
5.36
-48%
8.03
-121%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.49
9.47
-0%
7.71
19%
9.77
-3%
15.81
-67%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.5
6.4
-83%
4.6
-31%
6.2
-77%
10.4
-197%
Gamma
2.229 99%
2.108 104%
2.674 82%
2.345 94%
2.02 109%
CCT
6753 96%
7292 89%
6806 96%
8460 77%
10070 65%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 100 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9440 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1419 Points ∼31%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
3628 Points ∼79% +156%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2461 Points ∼54% +73%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1405 Points ∼31% -1%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1125 - 1460, n=13)
1226 Points ∼27% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=315)
4567 Points ∼100% +222%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1769 Points ∼39%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
4179 Points ∼91% +136%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2542 Points ∼55% +44%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1602 Points ∼35% -9%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
1418 Points ∼31% -20%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1418 - 1896, n=15)
1617 Points ∼35% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=373)
4590 Points ∼100% +159%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
657 Points ∼48%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
1194 Points ∼87% +82%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
674 Points ∼49% +3%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
636 Points ∼46% -3%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
579 Points ∼42% -12%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (571 - 675, n=15)
590 Points ∼43% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=375)
1369 Points ∼100% +108%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3227 Points ∼54%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
5930 Points ∼100% +84%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
3596 Points ∼61% +11%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
3146 Points ∼53% -3%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
2630 Points ∼44% -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (2630 - 5377, n=16)
2752 Points ∼46% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=369)
5030 Points ∼85% +56%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
7321 Points ∼100%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4323 Points ∼59%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (0 - 4711, n=12)
3134 Points ∼43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=537)
5514 Points ∼75%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
634 Points ∼35%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1167 Points ∼64% +84%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
611 Points ∼33% -4%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (573 - 677, n=15)
490 Points ∼27% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=383)
1833 Points ∼100% +189%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
101 Points ∼6%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
305 Points ∼19% +202%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
75 Points ∼5% -26%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (75 - 189, n=15)
78 Points ∼5% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=383)
1606 Points ∼100% +1490%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
124 Points ∼8%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
365 Points ∼24% +194%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
93 Points ∼6% -25%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (93 - 225, n=15)
95.5 Points ∼6% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=386)
1492 Points ∼100% +1103%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
630 Points ∼35%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1184 Points ∼65% +88%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
885 Points ∼49% +40%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
611 Points ∼34% -3%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (530 - 698, n=15)
572 Points ∼32% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=398)
1810 Points ∼100% +187%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
164 Points ∼7%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
529 Points ∼24% +223%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
250 Points ∼11% +52%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
131 Points ∼6% -20%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (131 - 189, n=15)
148 Points ∼7% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=398)
2191 Points ∼100% +1236%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
196 Points ∼11%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
603 Points ∼32% +208%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
297 Points ∼16% +52%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
159 Points ∼9% -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (159 - 225, n=15)
176 Points ∼9% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=399)
1863 Points ∼100% +851%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
606 Points ∼34%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1103 Points ∼62% +82%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
549 Points ∼31% -9%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (486 - 690, n=16)
526 Points ∼30% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=459)
1768 Points ∼100% +192%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
85 Points ∼6%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
257 Points ∼19% +202%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
69 Points ∼5% -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (65 - 185, n=16)
79.5 Points ∼6% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=461)
1333 Points ∼100% +1468%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
105 Points ∼8%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
310 Points ∼24% +195%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
86 Points ∼7% -18%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (80 - 221, n=16)
97.8 Points ∼8% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=469)
1271 Points ∼100% +1110%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
594 Points ∼35%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1136 Points ∼68% +91%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
892 Points ∼53% +50%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
532 Points ∼32% -10%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (445 - 690, n=15)
561 Points ∼33% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=492)
1677 Points ∼100% +182%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
125 Points ∼7%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
523 Points ∼29% +318%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
46 Points ∼3% -63%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
104 Points ∼6% -17%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (102 - 185, n=15)
128 Points ∼7% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=492)
1806 Points ∼100% +1345%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
152 Points ∼10%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
594 Points ∼38% +291%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
58 Points ∼4% -62%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
127 Points ∼8% -16%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (120 - 211, n=15)
153 Points ∼10% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=500)
1550 Points ∼100% +920%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
9801 Points ∼59%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
16576 Points ∼100% +69%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
8971 Points ∼54% -8%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
10427 Points ∼63% +6%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
9159 Points ∼55% -7%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (7103 - 10981, n=15)
9375 Points ∼57% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=651)
13704 Points ∼83% +40%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3585 Points ∼18%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
14603 Points ∼72% +307%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9686 Points ∼48% +170%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
5487 Points ∼27% +53%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
2878 Points ∼14% -20%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (2878 - 4346, n=15)
3363 Points ∼17% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7573 - 162695, n=651)
20176 Points ∼100% +463%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
4173 Points ∼25%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
15000 Points ∼90% +259%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9517 Points ∼57% +128%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6133 Points ∼37% +47%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
3395 Points ∼20% -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (3392 - 4339, n=15)
3870 Points ∼23% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8513 - 83518, n=652)
16708 Points ∼100% +300%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
6 fps ∼17%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
24 fps ∼68% +300%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
16 fps ∼45% +167%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
7.6 fps ∼22% +27%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
5 fps ∼14% -17%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (4.9 - 6.1, n=16)
5.61 fps ∼16% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=680)
35.2 fps ∼100% +487%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
9.8 fps ∼26%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
37 fps ∼100% +278%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
25 fps ∼68% +155%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
14 fps ∼38% +43%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
8.2 fps ∼22% -16%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (8.2 - 15, n=16)
9.84 fps ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=683)
27.1 fps ∼73% +177%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
2.7 fps ∼14%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
10 fps ∼51% +270%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
7.1 fps ∼36% +163%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
2.7 fps ∼14% 0%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (2.2 - 2.8, n=14)
2.56 fps ∼13% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=599)
19.5 fps ∼100% +622%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
5.4 fps ∼27%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
20 fps ∼100% +270%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
13 fps ∼65% +141%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
6.1 fps ∼31% +13%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
4.4 fps ∼22% -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (4.4 - 10, n=16)
5.61 fps ∼28% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=604)
17.9 fps ∼90% +231%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.6 fps ∼10%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
6.9 fps ∼43% +331%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.5 fps ∼16% +56%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
1.3 fps ∼8% -19%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1.3 - 1.7, n=16)
1.494 fps ∼9% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=460)
16 fps ∼100% +900%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
3.5 fps ∼23%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
15 fps ∼98% +329%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9.7 fps ∼63% +177%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
2.8 fps ∼18% -20%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (2.6 - 6.7, n=16)
3.51 fps ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=463)
15.3 fps ∼100% +337%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.86 fps ∼10%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
4.3 fps ∼48% +400%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.8 fps ∼31% +226%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (0.61 - 2, n=4)
1.028 fps ∼12% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=163)
8.9 fps ∼100% +935%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.35 fps ∼6%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
1.3 fps ∼21% +271%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
0.88 fps ∼14% +151%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (0.35 - 0.4, n=4)
0.24 fps ∼4% -31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=163)
6.19 fps ∼100% +1669%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.8 fps ∼13%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
6.8 fps ∼50% +278%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4.7 fps ∼35% +161%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1.4 - 2.5, n=5)
2 fps ∼15% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=164)
13.5 fps ∼100% +650%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.95 fps ∼6%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
3.8 fps ∼26% +300%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.6 fps ∼18% +174%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (0.6 - 0.95, n=5)
0.804 fps ∼5% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=164)
14.8 fps ∼100% +1458%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
0.89 fps ∼8%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
3.9 fps ∼36% +338%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.6 fps ∼24% +192%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (0.6 - 0.91, n=14)
0.826 fps ∼8% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=389)
10.7 fps ∼100% +1102%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1.6 fps ∼16%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
7.9 fps ∼81% +394%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5 fps ∼52% +213%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1.1 - 2.6, n=15)
1.553 fps ∼16% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=393)
9.7 fps ∼100% +506%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
10 Points ∼1%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
1045 Points ∼100% +10350%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
673 Points ∼64% +6630%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
649 Points ∼62% +6390%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
10 Points ∼1% 0%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (7 - 624, n=15)
165 Points ∼16% +1550%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=612)
744 Points ∼71% +7340%
Graphics (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
186 Points ∼9%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
1069 Points ∼55% +475%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
741 Points ∼38% +298%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
428 Points ∼22% +130%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
149 Points ∼8% -20%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (18 - 190, n=15)
161 Points ∼8% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=612)
1961 Points ∼100% +954%
Memory (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1010 Points ∼69%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
1068 Points ∼73% +6%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
884 Points ∼60% -12%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
502 Points ∼34% -50%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
431 Points ∼29% -57%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (420 - 1039, n=15)
768 Points ∼52% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=612)
1464 Points ∼100% +45%
System (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
1367 Points ∼35%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
3865 Points ∼100% +183%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1808 Points ∼47% +32%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
1228 Points ∼32% -10%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
1115 Points ∼29% -18%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (1103 - 1526, n=15)
1294 Points ∼33% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=612)
2880 Points ∼75% +111%
Overall (sort by value)
TP-Link Neffos C9
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 2048
223 Points ∼15%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 2048
1465 Points ∼100% +557%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
945 Points ∼65% +324%
Nokia 2.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Adreno 308, 1024
643 Points ∼44% +188%
Gigaset GS100
Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 1024
162 Points ∼11% -27%
Average Mediatek MT6739
  (162 - 637, n=15)
291 Points ∼20% +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=616)
1431 Points ∼98% +542%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G7 Play
42.626 Points ∼100% +142%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 273, n=514)
39 Points ∼91% +122%
Wiko View 2 Go (Chrome 71)
17.759 Points ∼42% +1%
TP-Link Neffos C9 (Chrome 73)
17.605 Points ∼41%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (13.4 - 18.5, n=14)
16.7 Points ∼39% -5%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
15.853 Points ∼37% -10%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
13.378 Points ∼31% -24%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G7 Play
8185 Points ∼100% +142%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=673)
6334 Points ∼77% +87%
TP-Link Neffos C9 (Chrome 73)
3386 Points ∼41%
Wiko View 2 Go (Chrome 71)
3089 Points ∼38% -9%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (2093 - 3386, n=15)
2945 Points ∼36% -13%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
2503 Points ∼31% -26%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
2093 Points ∼26% -38%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average Mediatek MT6739 (13599 - 18154, n=16)
16427 ms * ∼100% -21%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
15962 ms * ∼97% -17%
Nokia 2.1 (Chrome 70)
13821 ms * ∼84% -2%
TP-Link Neffos C9 (Chrome 73)
13599.1 ms * ∼83%
Wiko View 2 Go (Chrome 71)
13373 ms * ∼81% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=693)
10747 ms * ∼65% +21%
Motorola Moto G7 Play
4806 ms * ∼29% +65%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=143)
63.3 Points ∼100% +134%
TP-Link Neffos C9 (Chrome 73)
27 Points ∼43%
Average Mediatek MT6739 (23 - 27, n=2)
25 Points ∼39% -7%

* ... smaller is better

TP-Link Neffos C9Motorola Moto G7 PlayNokia 2.1Gigaset GS100Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
270%
154%
109%
64%
138%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
9.5 (Kingston 32GB)
64.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
575%
61.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
552%
61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
542%
38.8 (6.38 - 65.7, n=129)
308%
48.7 (9.5 - 87.1, n=406)
413%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
18.3 (Kingston 32GB)
84.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
363%
79.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
334%
79.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
334%
57.7 (8.1 - 87.7, n=129)
215%
66.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=406)
264%
Random Write 4KB
12.7
73
475%
13.45
6%
6.2
-51%
7.9 (0.49 - 44.9, n=245)
-38%
20.4 (0.14 - 250, n=721)
61%
Random Read 4KB
41.7
74
77%
50.46
21%
17.6
-58%
21.2 (2.49 - 62.1, n=245)
-49%
45.3 (1.59 - 175, n=721)
9%
Sequential Write 256KB
50.8
111
119%
51.18
1%
24
-53%
42.6 (8.74 - 106, n=245)
-16%
92.9 (2.99 - 503, n=721)
83%
Sequential Read 256KB
266.1
289
9%
288.26
8%
97.2
-63%
164 (9.66 - 294, n=245)
-38%
261 (12.1 - 1468, n=721)
-2%
Carga Máxima
 35.5 °C32.8 °C33.3 °C 
 34.8 °C32.7 °C33.6 °C 
 34.2 °C32.8 °C32.7 °C 
Máximo: 35.5 °C
Médio: 33.6 °C
32.8 °C33.9 °C36.6 °C
32.7 °C34 °C35.9 °C
32.8 °C34 °C34.8 °C
Máximo: 36.6 °C
Médio: 34.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  37.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.244.92542.140.53134.636.64037.335.85039.836.26332.733.98027.726.210027.826.712525.726.116023.328.32002331.825021.437.931521.443.340020.148.750020.555.363021.86680020.472.610002073.6125018.274.5160018.971.320001869.7250019.170.6315018.268.940001867.550001964.663001862.7800018.168.71000018.1701250018.269.61600018.154.5SPL6267.731.382N14.623.11.649.3median 19.1median 66Delta1.81227.63927.23730.42928.434.828.133.42527.217.721.91823.118.32415.134.71646.915.753.813.755.613.355.613.657.412.465.313.166.413.869.211.570.411.772.710.873.511.169.510.669.21167.311.863.51261.11166.31170.310.769.711.158.463.260.524.981.115.712.10.547.7median 12median 65.31.910.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTP-Link Neffos C9Motorola Moto G7 Play
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
TP-Link Neffos C9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Motorola Moto G7 Play audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.5 / 2.2 / 2.9 Watt
Carga midlight 4 / 5.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
TP-Link Neffos C9
3840 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Play
3000 mAh
Wiko View 2 Go
4000 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Gigaset GS100
3000 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6739
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
8%
17%
32%
1%
-6%
15%
Idle Minimum *
1.5
1
33%
0.8
47%
0.7
53%
1.3
13%
1.522 (0.87 - 2.8, n=16)
-1%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=749)
41%
Idle Average *
2.2
1.7
23%
2
9%
1.2
45%
2.1
5%
2.17 (1.6 - 3.5, n=16)
1%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=748)
21%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
2.6
10%
2.3
21%
1.9
34%
2.9
-0%
2.86 (1.68 - 6.3, n=16)
1%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=749)
30%
Load Average *
4
4.1
-3%
3.6
10%
3.2
20%
4.4
-10%
4.73 (2.8 - 7, n=16)
-18%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=743)
-2%
Load Maximum *
5.2
6.5
-25%
5.4
-4%
4.8
8%
5.3
-2%
5.99 (3.5 - 11.9, n=16)
-15%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=743)
-13%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9h 28min
TP-Link Neffos C9
3840 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Play
3000 mAh
Wiko View 2 Go
4000 mAh
Nokia 2.1
4000 mAh
Gigaset GS100
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
568
690
21%
734
29%
809
42%
532
-6%

Pro

+ Grande tela
+ Dual SIM
+ Expansão microSD
+ Slots para cartões dedicados
+ Acessível

Contra

- Desempenho lento
- Duração da bateria abaixo do esperado
The TP-Link Neffos C9 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Cyberport.
The TP-Link Neffos C9 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Cyberport.

O TP-Link Neffos C9 é um smartphone de baixo custo. Sua tela grande e o hardware desatualizado ainda o tornam bom o suficiente para aplicações e tarefas cotidianas, como o uso de mídias sociais e a navegação na Internet. No entanto, nossa unidade de teste se sente mais lenta do que seus contemporâneos, e não se ajuda com sua duração de bateria relativamente curta.

O TP-Link Neffos C9 vai atrair aqueles que estão atrás de um smartphone econômico com uma grande tela. Você deve suportar o desempenho lânguido e a duração da bateria nada inspiradora.

A capacidade de ter dois cartões SIM e um cartão microSD instalados simultaneamente é algo que nem todos os dispositivos oferecem, mas esse é um pequeno ponto positivo. Em suma, o Neffos C9 não se distingue de outros smartphones econômicos. Ele não se sai muito bem e frustra em muitas áreas.

TP-Link Neffos C9 - 05/20/2019 v6
Mike Wobker, Eric Ferrari-Herrmann

Acabamento
82%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
38 / 60 → 63%
Peso
91%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
7 / 63 → 11%
Desempenho da aplicação
34 / 70 → 48%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
57 / 91 → 63%
Camera
60%
Médio
69%
79%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone TP-Link Neffos C9
Mike Wobker, Eric Ferrari-Herrmann, 2019-05-24 (Update: 2019-05-25)