Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Subportátil Toshiba Portégé A30-D (7100U, 128 GB)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 310 cd/m²
Contraste: 1139:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.04 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 Toshiba TOS508F, , 1920x1080, 13.30 | Huawei MateBook X Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 2160x1440, 13.30 | Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T Chi Mei N140HCE-EN1, , 1920x1080, 14.00 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -0% | -27% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 68 | 65.8 -3% | 67.2 -1% | 48.94 -28% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.1 | 96.2 -2% | 99.2 1% | 73.3 -25% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70 | 66.8 -5% | 69.3 -1% | 50.5 -28% |
| Response Times | 19% | -26% | 4% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 33 ? 17% | 44 ? -10% | 32.8 ? 18% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 24 ? 20% | 29 ? 3% | 33.2 ? -11% |
| PWM Frequency | 208 ? | 60 ? -71% | ||
| Screen | 17% | 10% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle | 319 | 408 28% | 381 19% | 351.2 10% |
| Brightness | 296 | 395 33% | 368 24% | 325 10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 84 -5% | 89 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.45 -61% | 0.3 -7% | 0.195 30% |
| Contrast | 1139 | 907 -20% | 1270 12% | 1801 58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.04 | 1.55 62% | 2.84 30% | 7.4 -83% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.09 | 2.19 73% | 6.5 20% | 9.08 -12% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 1.91 65% | 4.02 27% | 6.71 -22% |
| Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.34 94% | 2.42 91% | 2.74 80% |
| CCT | 7198 90% | 6491 100% | 7430 87% | 7222 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 64 | 61 -5% | 56 -12% | 50.48 -21% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98 | 96 -2% | 86 -12% | 73.31 -25% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 11% /
13% | -5% /
1% | -9% /
-9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 208 Hz | ≤ 10 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 208 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 208 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3247 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4113 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8 | Huawei MateBook X LITEON CB1-SD256 | Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 84% | 36% | 152% | |
| Read Seq | 471.1 | 741 57% | 497 5% | 1233 162% |
| Write Seq | 138.5 | 461.2 233% | 323.7 134% | 733 429% |
| Read 512 | 413.5 | 504 22% | 289 -30% | 1036 151% |
| Write 512 | 138.7 | 310.3 124% | 288 108% | 439.9 217% |
| Read 4k | 22.95 | 29.48 28% | 22.78 -1% | 29.31 28% |
| Write 4k | 79.4 | 68.1 -14% | 79.5 0% | 116.9 47% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 235 | 498.9 112% | 147 -37% | 479.2 104% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 121.8 | 257.5 111% | 257.2 111% | 218.3 79% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1478 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5188 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 747 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 13.1 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 17.2 | |||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 44 | 16.9 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 30 / 30 dB |
| DVD |
| 37 / dB |
| Carga |
| 39.3 / 38.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.9 °C / 85.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-2.2 °C / -3.9 F).
Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook X audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.14 / 0.38 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.2 / 6.8 / 8 Watt |
| Carga |
30.4 / 28 Watt |
   
| |
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 i3-7100U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, LITEON CB1-SD256, , 2160x1440, 13.30 | Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -42% | -25% | 14% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 4.6 -44% | 3.5 -9% | 4.1 -28% |
| Idle Average * | 6.8 | 11 -62% | 6.6 3% | 4.2 38% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8 | 12 -50% | 7.1 11% | 5.1 36% |
| Load Average * | 30.4 | 39.5 -30% | 30 1% | 22.1 27% |
| Load Maximum * | 28 | 34.6 -24% | 65 -132% | 29.4 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
| Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 i3-7100U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -30% | -7% | 16% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1008 | 512 -49% | 1295 28% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 548 | 337 -39% | 511 -7% | 677 24% |
| Load | 165 | 162 -2% | 157 -5% |
Pro
Contra
O Toshiba Portégé A30-D-139 nos deixa com alguns sentimentos mistos, apesar da classificação final boa a muito boa. Isto deve-se principalmente aos problemas com o touchpad e o som inaceitável da nossa unidade de teste, além do SSD lento.
Tudo o que é necessário é presente para o grupo-alvo de usuários de escritório móveis e navegantes. Ao contrário dos rivais no teste, o Portégé vem com uma porta docking e, apenas, o visivelmente mais compacto Huawei MateBook X oferece recursos de segurança comparáveis. E de qualquer forma, a unidade de teste é relativamente grande e pesada em comparação com a concorrência. No entanto, o testador nunca notou isso de forma desfavorável. Não temos nenhuma queixa sobre a carcaça insensível e sólida, mas não perfeitamente construída.
O dispositivo tem que ser elogiado por sua bateria de fácil substituição desde o exterior, a tela muito boa e, acima de tudo, o sistema geralmente absolutamente silencioso. O fato de que o fabricante não use um processador i5 no modelo testado e tenha optado por um i3-7100U ainda suficientemente rápido também o torna possível. Dificilmente poderia ser empurrado até seus limites, mesmo no teste de estresse.
Só podemos dar uma recomendação de compra condicional desta vez. O touchpad será usado com frequência? O peso e uma carcaça especialmente compacta/fina são importantes? O portátil será usado para ouvir música? Será que a porta TB3 e/ou uma DisplayPort é necessária? Todos aqueles que tenham respondido a maioria dessas perguntas com sim deveriam procurar outro portátil. Todos os outros deveriam poder se acomodar bem ao novo Portégé.
Toshiba Portege A30-D-139
-
09/12/2017 v6(old)
Sven Kloevekorn