Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Amazon Fire HD 8 (2017)

Manuel Masiero (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/15/2017

Um verdadeiro roubo. A Amazon atualizou o seu tablet Fire HD 8 de 8 polegadas. Dependendo da configuração, custará entre $80 e $125 - realmente não é muito mais barato do que isso. Nossa análise irá esclarecer se o tablet realmente vale o dinheiro. Durante o dia "prime" deste ano, chegou a custar até $49!

Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Fire Serie)
Processador
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz 1.3 GHz
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T720
Memória
1536 MB 
Pantalha
8 polegadas 16:10, 1280x800 pixel 189 PPI, 10-point Multitouch, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.99 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3,5 mm audio, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 256 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, sensor de taxa angular, sensor de luz ambiente
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1 LE
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.7 x 214 x 128
Bateria
Lítio-Ion, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 12 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Primary Camera: 0.3 MPix VGA, 640 x 480
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix 1600 x 1200, 720p video
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador modular de 5 V, cabo microUSB 2.0, guia de inícia rápido, Amazon Appstore, Amazon Apps, Silk-Browser, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
369 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g
Preço
110 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
209 MBit/s ∼100% +110%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
209 MBit/s ∼100% +143%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
86 MBit/s ∼41%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
419
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 427 cd/m² Médio: 411.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.14 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 419 cd/m²
Contraste: 1074:1 (Preto: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.5 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 10.3 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.6
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Xiaomi MiPad 2
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4
Screen
21%
14%
9%
Brightness
412
348
-16%
402
-2%
445
8%
Brightness Distribution
91
90
-1%
91
0%
90
-1%
Black Level *
0.39
0.26
33%
0.4
-3%
0.45
-15%
Contrast
1074
1396
30%
1063
-1%
1022
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.5
5.8
32%
4.98
41%
6.2
27%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
10.3
5.5
47%
5.2
50%
6.5
37%
Gamma
2.6 92%
2.24 107%
2.65 91%
2.33 103%
CCT
6216 105%
7388 88%
7249 90%
8056 81%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5559 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 11.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (43 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
86735 Points ∼38% +150%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
73083 Points ∼32% +111%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
36440 Points ∼16% +5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
34714 Points ∼15%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
2907 Points ∼43%
Work performance score
Xiaomi MiPad 2
5279 Points ∼64% +28%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5204 Points ∼63% +26%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
4507 Points ∼54% +9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
4125 Points ∼50%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1022 Points ∼66% +72%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
952 Points ∼62% +61%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
655 Points ∼42% +10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
593 Points ∼38%
Graphics
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1609 Points ∼19% +382%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1302 Points ∼15% +290%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
339 Points ∼4% +1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
334 Points ∼4%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2212 Points ∼50% +201%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1379 Points ∼31% +87%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
908 Points ∼21% +23%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
736 Points ∼17%
System
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3581 Points ∼54% +211%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1921 Points ∼29% +67%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
1271 Points ∼19% +10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
1152 Points ∼18%
Overall
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1800 Points ∼47% +181%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1419 Points ∼37% +122%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
712 Points ∼19% +11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
640 Points ∼17%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5277 Points ∼19% +233%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
1583 Points ∼6%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1726 Points ∼31% +187%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
601 Points ∼11%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
1683 Points ∼10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
628 Points ∼13%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2322 Points ∼77% +164%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1572 Points ∼52% +79%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
878 Points ∼29%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
793 Points ∼26% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1261 Points ∼23% +942%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
832 Points ∼15% +588%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
121 Points ∼2%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
116 Points ∼2% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1319 Points ∼34% +779%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
970 Points ∼25% +547%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
150 Points ∼4%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
143 Points ∼4% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2261 Points ∼75% +157%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1580 Points ∼52% +79%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
920 Points ∼31% +4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
881 Points ∼29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1300 Points ∼17% +574%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
997 Points ∼13% +417%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
203 Points ∼3% +5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
193 Points ∼2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1353 Points ∼27% +478%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1139 Points ∼23% +387%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
246 Points ∼5% +5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
234 Points ∼5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi MiPad 2
20142 Points ∼29% +117%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
15538 Points ∼22% +68%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
10857 Points ∼16% +17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
9274 Points ∼13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Xiaomi MiPad 2
27537 Points ∼6% +407%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
22141 Points ∼5% +307%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5435 Points ∼1%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
5326 Points ∼1% -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Xiaomi MiPad 2
25460 Points ∼13% +325%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
20230 Points ∼10% +238%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
6006 Points ∼3% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5986 Points ∼3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Xiaomi MiPad 2
32 fps ∼2% +223%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
29 fps ∼2% +193%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
10 fps ∼1% +1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
9.9 fps ∼1%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
23 fps ∼5% +35%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
17 fps ∼4% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
17 fps ∼4%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
13 fps ∼3% -24%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
13 fps ∼2% +261%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
8.4 fps ∼2% +133%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
3.6 fps ∼1% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
3.6 fps ∼1%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
9 fps ∼2% +27%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
7.2 fps ∼2% +1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
7.1 fps ∼2%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6.3 fps ∼2% -11%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi MiPad 2
13 fps ∼3% +465%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
7.7 fps ∼2% +235%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
2.3 fps ∼1% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
2.3 fps ∼1%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6.3 fps ∼4% +26%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
5.1 fps ∼3% +2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5 fps ∼3%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
4.2 fps ∼2% -16%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi MiPad 2
8.4 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
4.8 fps ∼1%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi MiPad 2
5.7 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3.1 fps ∼0%

Legend

 
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi MiPad 2 Intel Atom x5-Z8500, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
11404 Points ∼100% +304%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
7994 Points ∼70% +183%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
2826 Points ∼25%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
2821 Points ∼25% 0%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
136 Points ∼100% +139%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
57 Points ∼42% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
57 Points ∼42%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
53.7 Points ∼100% +175%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
43.039 Points ∼80% +120%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
19.519 Points ∼36%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
19.3 Points ∼36% -1%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
12160.7 ms * ∼100% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
11817.6 ms * ∼97%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
4420.4 ms * ∼36% +63%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2822.9 ms * ∼23% +76%

* ... smaller is better

Amazon Fire HD 8 2017Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026AXiaomi MiPad 2Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
12%
69%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
34.15
24.9
-27%
23.52
-31%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
51.06
35.2
-31%
61.65
21%
Random Write 4KB
11.51
8.35
-27%
13.96
21%
31.35
172%
Random Read 4KB
21.55
21.96
2%
24.42
13%
32.04
49%
Sequential Write 256KB
47.23
45.71
-3%
56.37
19%
117.15
148%
Sequential Read 256KB
159.08
158.44
0%
147.85
-7%
249.68
57%
Carga Máxima
 35.4 °C34.4 °C33.7 °C 
 37.5 °C34.1 °C34.1 °C 
 36.7 °C34.8 °C32.8 °C 
Máximo: 37.5 °C
Médio: 34.8 °C
30.5 °C33 °C36.8 °C
31.7 °C32.4 °C37.7 °C
31.7 °C33.4 °C35.5 °C
Máximo: 37.7 °C
Médio: 33.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  36 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.52525.437.83125.336.64032.933.15033.633.16331.637.68028.442.81002746.212520.849.41602247.720021.350.625020.857.231521.254.340019.460.750019.565.363017.765.880017.966.2100017.865.2125017.362.8160017.464200016.763.9250017.266.7315018.267.3400017.966.6500017.669630017.769800017.863.81000017.962.91250018.159.41600018.246.6SPL3077.7N1.343.8median 17.9Amazon Fire HD 8 2017median 63.8Delta1.35.831.638.825.437.225.328.932.930.833.641.731.632.828.429.22722.620.828.62242.921.349.920.851.121.260.119.46719.570.417.771.417.972.617.875.517.375.317.475.516.775.317.277.818.281.717.979.317.670.917.765.917.867.717.962.718.151.918.247.730881.369.4median 17.9Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inchmedian 67.71.312.324.330.828.624.325.930.22725.926.329.83026.329.130.334.929.127.627.531.627.623.624.935.323.622.824.528.122.827.627.728.827.638.638.236.338.620.12321.720.122.926.720.422.92933.620.12939.943.921.139.947.752.123.347.755.159.72455.151.25618.751.258.462.918.458.46164.518616265.916.5626064.414.36058.162.515.658.156.760.714.156.75963.314596165.214.36158.96314.858.959.263.513.759.257.361.313.457.351.955.913.251.960.263.913.260.256.960.613.156.97175.129.47126.734.41.326.7median 56.9Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026Amedian 60.7median 16.5median 56.99.29.53.79.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 17% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.04 / 0.18 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.99 / 2.74 / 2.83 Watt
Carga midlight 4.51 / 5.69 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
 mAh
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
4000 mAh
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6190 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5100 mAh
Power Consumption
-3%
-110%
-46%
Idle Minimum *
0.99
1.32
-33%
3.33
-236%
1.51
-53%
Idle Average *
2.74
2.71
1%
5.01
-83%
3.64
-33%
Idle Maximum *
2.83
2.83
-0%
5.19
-83%
3.68
-30%
Load Average *
4.51
4.24
6%
8.32
-84%
6.95
-54%
Load Maximum *
5.69
5.01
12%
9.33
-64%
9.11
-60%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
33h 52min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
12h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)
6h 33min
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
 mAh
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
4000 mAh
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6190 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5100 mAh
Battery Runtime
-30%
-45%
-32%
Reader / Idle
2032
1305
-36%
1110
-45%
H.264
744
624
-16%
583
-22%
WiFi v1.3
770
472
-39%
421
-45%
546
-29%
Load
393
287
-27%
268
-32%

Pro

+ Qualidade e sensação decentes
+ Cartões MicroSD de até 256 GB
+ Tela brilhante
+ Dual-band Wi-Fi
+ Permanece frio
+ Sem afogamentos
+ Som estéreo com Dolby Atmos
+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Econômico

Contra

- Amarrado à Amazon
- SO desatualizado, baseado em Android 5.1.1
- Sem Google Play
- Câmera pobre
- Sem NFC, sem GSM/UMTS/LTE
- Sem GPS
In review: Amazon Fire HD 8 (2017). Review model courtesy of Amazon Germany.
In review: Amazon Fire HD 8 (2017). Review model courtesy of Amazon Germany.

Como seus predecessores e irmãos de 7 e 10 polegadas, o Amazon Fire HD 8 (2017) oferece uma incrível relação preço-desempenho.

Equipado com uma tela IPS de 8 polegadas de 1280x800, um SoC quad-core MediaTek MT8163, e 16 ou 32 GB de armazenamento, o Fire HD oferece suficiente desemepnho ára o uso diário. E, embora isso também seja verdade para seus concorrentes, eles tendem a ser mais caros. Em qualquer lugar entre $80 e $125, você terá um tablet bem feito com longa duração da bateria e som estéreo decente.

Aqueles de vocês, que já possuem o antecessor, podem ignorar esta última versão. Além de alguns aprimoramentos menores (cartão microSD maior, GPU um pouco mais veloz), ele realmente não mudou muito.

Por outro lado, o tablet vem com seu próprio conjunto peculiar de limitações, o foco essencialmente óbvio no ecossistema da Amazon em geral. A Play Store do Google não é oficialmente suportado e sua instalação, anulará sua garantia. O Fire HD 8 (2017) é o aparelho perfeito se planeja ficar dentro do universo da Amazon.

Outras limitações são simplesmente terríveis, como o SO Android 5.1.1 desatualizado, a falta do GPS e WWAN, e as câmeras pobres que você teria que ser quase cego para encontrá-las remotamente aceitáveis.

Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 - 07/07/2017 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
80%
Teclado
70 / 80 → 88%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
29 / 65 → 44%
Peso
85 / 88 → 94%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
79%
Desempenho do jogos
10 / 68 → 14%
Desempenho da aplicação
35 / 76 → 46%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
79 / 91 → 87%
Camera
24 / 85 → 28%
Médio
67%
81%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Amazon Fire HD 8 (2017)
Manuel Masiero, 2017-07-15 (Update: 2017-07-18)