Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab: Google Assistant para pendurar

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/28/2020

Ergonômico na mão. O Yoga Smart Tab da Lenovo com certeza é diferente de seus irmãos. Seu design um tanto estranho consegue incorporar muitas vantagens, como dois alto-falantes e um suporte integrado. Equipado com o Android Pie, o tablet concentra-se principalmente no Google Assistant e no modo ambiente, mas oferece muito mais do que isso.

Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 505
Memória
4096 MB 
, DDR3
Pantalha
10.1 polegadas 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 55 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector pra fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT, up to 256 GB), Brightness Sensor, Sensores: giroscópio, acelerômetro, USB-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 23 x 242 x 166
Bateria
27 Wh, 7000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 10 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix autofocus, Camera2 API "Limited"
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix foco fixo
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes JBL 2x 2 Watts, Teclado: on-screen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, modular USB power supply, USB Type-C cable, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
580 g, Suprimento de energia: 69 g
Preço
299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionBest Price
79%01/2020Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
439, Adreno 505
580 g23 mm10.1"1920x1200
81%10/2018Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
450, Adreno 506
531 g8 mm10.5"1920x1200
79%12/2019Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
MT8183, Mali-G72 MP3
504 g9.8 mm10.1"1920x1200
80%01/2019Alldocube Alldocube X
MT8176, PowerVR GX6250
496 g6.9 mm10.5"2560x1600

Size Comparison

262 mm 159 mm 9.8 mm 504 g260 mm 161.1 mm 8 mm 531 g242 mm 166 mm 23 mm 580 g243.68 mm 173.14 mm 6.9 mm 496 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mali-G72 MP3, MT8183, 32 GB eMMC Flash
321 (min: 302, max: 327) MBit/s ∼100% +96%
Alldocube Alldocube X
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
254 MBit/s ∼79% +55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
216 (min: 49, max: 250) MBit/s ∼67% +32%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
Adreno 505, 439, 64 GB eMMC Flash
164 (min: 100, max: 233) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 291, max: 325) MBit/s ∼100% +40%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Mali-G72 MP3, MT8183, 32 GB eMMC Flash
299 (min: 279, max: 310) MBit/s ∼96% +34%
Alldocube Alldocube X
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
238 MBit/s ∼76% +7%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
Adreno 505, 439, 64 GB eMMC Flash
223 (min: 143, max: 310) MBit/s ∼71%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø164 (100-233)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø223 (143-310)
GNSS - Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab
GNSS - Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab
GNSS - Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab
GNSS - Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab
GNSS - Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab
GNSS - Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker Photo
29.4 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
65.8 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F: 47.18 ∆E min: 13.67 - max: 93.74 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
6.7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F: 5.69 ∆E min: 2.11 - max: 8.96 ∆E
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab - test chart
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab - test chart (Detail)
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab - test chart (1 Lux)
352
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
357
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
348
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 392 cd/m² Médio: 358.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4.57 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 392 cd/m²
Contraste: 1089:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.5
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Alldocube Alldocube X
AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5
Screen
26%
-12%
-53%
Brightness middle
392
556
42%
449
15%
297.3
-24%
Brightness
359
514
43%
425
18%
307
-14%
Brightness Distribution
88
87
-1%
89
1%
83
-6%
Black Level *
0.36
0.42
-17%
0.6
-67%
Contrast
1089
1324
22%
748
-31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.7
1.8
33%
3.1
-15%
6.74
-150%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.4
3.2
41%
6.4
-19%
14.42
-167%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.8
2.2
42%
3.8
-0%
2.2
42%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.26 97%
2.09 105%
2.31 95%
CCT
7276 89%
6819 95%
7202 90%
6719 97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13646 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.8 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
66 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 32.8 ms rise
↘ 33.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).
Geekbench 5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Tablet (136 - 2360, n=3)
922 Points ∼1% +241%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
270 Points ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (252 - 272, n=3)
265 Points ∼0% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Points ∼0% -100%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (375 - 4661, n=9)
1480 Points ∼9% +77%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
836 Points ∼5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (809 - 836, n=3)
819 Points ∼5% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Points ∼0% -100%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (134 - 1114, n=9)
491 Points ∼37% +177%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
177 Points ∼13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (176 - 177, n=3)
177 Points ∼13% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
Points ∼0% -100%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score
Average of class Tablet (840 - 43802, n=40)
5852 Points ∼13%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
4635 Points ∼11%
Alldocube Alldocube X
3419 Points ∼8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (2505 - 3199, n=3)
2962 Points ∼7%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
5445 Points ∼9%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=57)
4592 Points ∼8%
Alldocube Alldocube X
3976 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3846 Points ∼7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (2987 - 3267, n=4)
3141 Points ∼5%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=57)
1627 Points ∼26%
Alldocube Alldocube X
1624 Points ∼26%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1397 Points ∼22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (863 - 903, n=4)
880 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
745 Points ∼12%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
5056 Points ∼41% +15%
Alldocube Alldocube X
5020 Points ∼41% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (4412 - 4791, n=6)
4632 Points ∼38% +5%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
4412 Points ∼36%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 9615, n=47)
4339 Points ∼35% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
4171 Points ∼34% -5%
Work performance score
Alldocube Alldocube X
8356 Points ∼43% +36%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
6284 Points ∼32% +2%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
6154 Points ∼31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (5880 - 6228, n=6)
6095 Points ∼31% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
4914 Points ∼25% -20%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 11644, n=84)
4849 Points ∼25% -21%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2567 Points ∼16% +21%
Average of class Tablet (1786 - 2992, n=7)
2307 Points ∼15% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (2118 - 2172, n=6)
2139 Points ∼14% +1%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
2122 Points ∼13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (404 - 5819, n=7)
1513 Points ∼10% +275%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
955 Points ∼7% +136%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (401 - 412, n=6)
407 Points ∼3% +1%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
404 Points ∼3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (493 - 4809, n=7)
1472 Points ∼10% +199%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1110 Points ∼8% +125%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (490 - 502, n=6)
496 Points ∼3% +1%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
493 Points ∼3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2966 Points ∼37% +83%
Alldocube Alldocube X
1880 Points ∼24% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1768 Points ∼22% +9%
Average of class Tablet (650 - 3919, n=47)
1738 Points ∼22% +7%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
1621 Points ∼20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1500 - 1657, n=6)
1597 Points ∼20% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (99 - 6993, n=47)
1759 Points ∼21% +321%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
986 Points ∼12% +136%
Alldocube Alldocube X
809 Points ∼10% +94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (413 - 432, n=6)
420 Points ∼5% 0%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
418 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
413 Points ∼5% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (129 - 5816, n=47)
1543 Points ∼19% +208%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1158 Points ∼14% +131%
Alldocube Alldocube X
926 Points ∼11% +85%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
501 Points ∼6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (492 - 505, n=6)
500 Points ∼6% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
498 Points ∼6% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2963 Points ∼58% +84%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1766 Points ∼34% +10%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4700, n=55)
1667 Points ∼32% +4%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
1608 Points ∼31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1516 - 1618, n=6)
1588 Points ∼31% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=55)
3069 Points ∼11% +323%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1455 Points ∼5% +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (712 - 735, n=6)
727 Points ∼3% 0%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
726 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
712 Points ∼2% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=55)
2060 Points ∼15% +149%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1641 Points ∼12% +98%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
827 Points ∼6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (807 - 835, n=6)
826 Points ∼6% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
821 Points ∼6% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2832 Points ∼58% +79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1775 Points ∼36% +12%
Alldocube Alldocube X
1725 Points ∼35% +9%
Average of class Tablet (729 - 3695, n=63)
1688 Points ∼34% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1575 - 1657, n=6)
1613 Points ∼33% +2%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
1586 Points ∼32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet (55 - 6128, n=63)
1369 Points ∼19% +276%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
990 Points ∼14% +172%
Alldocube Alldocube X
778 Points ∼11% +114%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (364 - 372, n=6)
369 Points ∼5% +1%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
364 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
363 Points ∼5% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Tablet (70 - 5346, n=65)
1275 Points ∼18% +190%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1157 Points ∼16% +164%
Alldocube Alldocube X
886 Points ∼12% +102%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (439 - 448, n=6)
445 Points ∼6% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
441 Points ∼6% 0%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
439 Points ∼6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2818 Points ∼58% +81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1802 Points ∼37% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1561 - 1654, n=6)
1593 Points ∼33% +2%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 3678, n=68)
1578 Points ∼32% +1%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
1561 Points ∼32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (42 - 10647, n=68)
1917 Points ∼17% +168%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1434 Points ∼13% +101%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (704 - 735, n=6)
720 Points ∼6% +1%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
715 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
696 Points ∼6% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1610 Points ∼19% +98%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 6997, n=69)
1566 Points ∼19% +93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (802 - 835, n=6)
820 Points ∼10% +1%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
813 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
806 Points ∼10% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
18829 Points ∼22% +52%
Alldocube Alldocube X
17990 Points ∼21% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
14147 Points ∼16% +14%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51374, n=161)
13506 Points ∼16% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (12096 - 12809, n=6)
12492 Points ∼14% +1%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
12391 Points ∼14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 194856, n=161)
20616 Points ∼4% +54%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
19615 Points ∼4% +47%
Alldocube Alldocube X
16601 Points ∼3% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (13385 - 13656, n=6)
13502 Points ∼3% +1%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
13385 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
12323 Points ∼2% -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
19435 Points ∼8% +48%
Alldocube Alldocube X
16891 Points ∼7% +28%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 106954, n=162)
16234 Points ∼7% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (13151 - 13435, n=6)
13259 Points ∼6% +1%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
13151 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
12686 Points ∼5% -4%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
38 fps ∼0% +65%
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=184)
33.3 fps ∼0% +45%
Alldocube Alldocube X
33 fps ∼0% +43%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
23 fps ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (22 - 23, n=6)
22.8 fps ∼0% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
21 fps ∼0% -9%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
37 fps ∼1% +76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (21 - 35, n=6)
32.2 fps ∼1% +53%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=188)
21.7 fps ∼1% +3%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
21 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
20 fps ∼1% -5%
Alldocube Alldocube X
19 fps ∼1% -10%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=118)
22.6 fps ∼4% +131%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
20 fps ∼4% +104%
Alldocube Alldocube X
16 fps ∼3% +63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9.7 - 19, n=6)
11.3 fps ∼2% +15%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
9.8 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
9.2 fps ∼2% -6%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
21 fps ∼6% +126%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=124)
15.5 fps ∼4% +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9.3 - 19, n=6)
15.4 fps ∼4% +66%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
9.3 fps ∼3%
Alldocube Alldocube X
8.9 fps ∼2% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
8.8 fps ∼2% -5%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=70)
20.5 fps ∼0% +220%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
12 fps ∼0% +88%
Alldocube Alldocube X
9.9 fps ∼0% +55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (6.4 - 6.6, n=6)
6.43 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
6.4 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
6.1 fps ∼0% -5%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=70)
13.2 fps ∼0% +120%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (6 - 14, n=6)
12.2 fps ∼0% +103%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
12 fps ∼0% +100%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
6 fps ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
5.7 fps ∼0% -5%
Alldocube Alldocube X
5 fps ∼0% -17%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=19)
10.4 fps ∼7% +420%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
4.3 fps ∼3% +115%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (2 - 4.1, n=6)
3.63 fps ∼2% +82%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
2 fps ∼1%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.8 - 51.1, n=19)
10.9 fps ∼7% +808%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2.6 fps ∼2% +117%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
1.2 fps ∼1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1.2 - 1.2, n=6)
1.2 fps ∼1% 0%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=19)
15.2 fps ∼8% +334%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.4 fps ∼4% +111%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (3.5 - 6.7, n=5)
5.98 fps ∼3% +71%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
3.5 fps ∼2%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 134, n=19)
29.3 fps ∼7% +714%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.6 fps ∼2% +111%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (3.6 - 3.7, n=6)
3.65 fps ∼1% +1%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
3.6 fps ∼1%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=46)
14.7 fps ∼4% +320%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.4 fps ∼2% +111%
Alldocube Alldocube X
5.1 fps ∼1% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (3.5 - 3.6, n=6)
3.53 fps ∼1% +1%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
3.5 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3.4 fps ∼1% -3%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=46)
8.82 fps ∼3% +159%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
7.4 fps ∼3% +118%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (3.4 - 7.3, n=6)
6.48 fps ∼2% +91%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
3.4 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3.3 fps ∼1% -3%
Alldocube Alldocube X
2.9 fps ∼1% -15%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
99193 Points ∼18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (84645 - 99193, n=4)
93569 Points ∼17% -6%
Average of class Tablet (78450 - 99193, n=3)
85589 Points ∼15% -14%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 566378, n=32)
160864 Points ∼28%
Alldocube Alldocube X
107784 Points ∼19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (75175 - 79792, n=3)
77540 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
70431 Points ∼12%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
0 Points ∼0%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
929 Points ∼46% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (816 - 1083, n=6)
874 Points ∼43% +7%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
816 Points ∼40%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=114)
760 Points ∼37% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
10 Points ∼0% -99%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=115)
2245 Points ∼8% +126%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1550 Points ∼5% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (995 - 1009, n=6)
1003 Points ∼3% +1%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
995 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
943 Points ∼3% -5%
Memory
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
2380 Points ∼32% +89%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
1261 Points ∼17%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 5617, n=115)
1121 Points ∼15% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (655 - 1335, n=6)
1102 Points ∼15% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
969 Points ∼13% -23%
System
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
3827 Points ∼23% +44%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
2658 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
2561 Points ∼16% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (2238 - 2687, n=6)
2511 Points ∼15% -6%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=115)
2502 Points ∼15% -6%
Overall
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
1903 Points ∼23% +48%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=114)
1310 Points ∼16% +2%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
1284 Points ∼15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (1090 - 1312, n=6)
1236 Points ∼15% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
389 Points ∼5% -70%

Legend

 
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F Qualcomm Snapdragon 439, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 Mediatek MT8183, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Alldocube Alldocube X Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (16.1 - 110, n=9)
52.9 Points ∼100% +225%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
25.621 Points ∼48% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (15.9 - 16.9, n=5)
16.4 Points ∼31% +1%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79)
16.3 Points ∼31%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Alldocube Alldocube X (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
53.618 Points ∼100% +103%
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=92)
53 Points ∼99% +100%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
45.743 Points ∼85% +73%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79)
26.439 Points ∼49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (25.3 - 27.1, n=6)
26.3 Points ∼49% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
22.084 Points ∼41% -16%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Tablet (13 - 182, n=27)
68.7 Points ∼100% +86%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
52 Points ∼76% +41%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79)
37 Points ∼54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (32 - 38, n=6)
35.2 Points ∼51% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
33 Points ∼48% -11%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 132, n=17)
47.2 runs/min ∼100% +157%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
27.7 runs/min ∼59% +51%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79)
18.4 runs/min ∼39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (17.4 - 18.5, n=5)
18 runs/min ∼38% -2%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Alldocube Alldocube X (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
10377 Points ∼100% +115%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
8665 Points ∼84% +80%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=178)
6938 Points ∼67% +44%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79)
4817 Points ∼46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (4512 - 4958, n=6)
4731 Points ∼46% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
4078 Points ∼39% -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
11529.2 ms * ∼100% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (9768 - 10143, n=6)
9963 ms * ∼86% -0%
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79)
9928.9 ms * ∼86%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=189)
9175 ms * ∼80% +8%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 (Silk Browser 75.3.60)
4979.3 ms * ∼43% +50%
Alldocube Alldocube X (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
4040.7 ms * ∼35% +59%

* ... smaller is better

Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705FSamsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590NAmazon Fire HD 10 2019Alldocube Alldocube XAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
-2%
-30%
-3%
-53%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.44 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
51.96 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-21%
66.08
1%
57.8 (11.2 - 74.7, n=110)
-12%
47.2 (14 - 73.8, n=60)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
86.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
80.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
77.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-11%
87.2
1%
76.8 (21.1 - 87.2, n=110)
-11%
65.2 (17.6 - 87.7, n=60)
-25%
Random Write 4KB
16.76
13.39
-20%
23.28
39%
11.62
-31%
25.6 (3.4 - 125, n=125)
53%
7.02 (0.13 - 170, n=211)
-58%
Random Read 4KB
64.84
71.13
10%
74.99
16%
14.62
-77%
56 (11.4 - 149, n=125)
-14%
20.9 (1.04 - 192, n=211)
-68%
Sequential Write 256KB
238.93
103.32
-57%
180.1
-25%
101.11
-58%
172 (40 - 254, n=125)
-28%
44.4 (2.04 - 522, n=211)
-81%
Sequential Read 256KB
295.63
285.63
-3%
266.16
-10%
255.4
-14%
275 (95.6 - 704, n=125)
-7%
121 (6.75 - 1416, n=211)
-59%
Arena of Valor
010203040Tooltip
; min: Ø29.4 (9-31)
; high HD: Ø30.3 (29-31)
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø11.6 (6-17)
; Standard / low: Ø28.6 (21-31)
Carga Máxima
 26.2 °C28.3 °C32.9 °C 
 26.3 °C27.9 °C33.6 °C 
 25.9 °C27.6 °C33.7 °C 
Máximo: 33.7 °C
Médio: 29.2 °C
27.7 °C27.1 °C26.2 °C
33.1 °C27.8 °C25.8 °C
32.4 °C31.2 °C25.4 °C
Máximo: 33.1 °C
Médio: 28.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  27.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34.7 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
Heat map top
Heat map top
Heat map bottom
Heat map bottom
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.433.5253032.23126.7264027.723.25037.636.66328.824.8802427.110021.235.812521.549.916021.16720016.267.325018.772.23151674.44001670.350014.571.463014.672.980014.471.1100015.674.5125015.373.8160014.669.8200014.673.7250014.574.3315014.772.2400014.672.8500014.575.3630014.569.8800014.765.31000015.160.41250015.160.61600015.163SPL27.184.6N0.966.7median 15.1median 71.1Delta1.44.933.933.229.225.221.52124.225.434.331.624.429.92522.424.326.323.532.223.839.820.942.519.44818.254.816.758.215.862.614.667.214.470.31472.314.573.314.274.514.373.913.573.914.874.61576.814.480.514.972.714.569.11565.814.85515.153.527.186.30.963.7median 14.9median 67.22.511.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705FAmazon Fire HD 10 2019
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Amazon Fire HD 10 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.16 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.28 / 4.5 / 4.59 Watt
Carga midlight 5.71 / 6.99 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
7300 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
6300 mAh
Alldocube Alldocube X
8000 mAh
Power Consumption
5%
9%
-61%
Idle Minimum *
1.28
1.26
2%
1.14
11%
3.8
-197%
Idle Average *
4.5
4.22
6%
3.71
18%
5.9
-31%
Idle Maximum *
4.59
4.29
7%
3.74
19%
6.3
-37%
Load Average *
5.71
5.48
4%
5.26
8%
7.4
-30%
Load Maximum *
6.99
6.57
6%
7.68
-10%
7.6
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
34h 43min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 19min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 48min
Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
7300 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2019
6300 mAh
Alldocube Alldocube X
8000 mAh
Battery Runtime
13%
10%
-68%
Reader / Idle
2083
1960
-6%
1691
-19%
H.264
919
963
5%
1480
61%
WiFi v1.3
795
938
18%
950
19%
253
-68%
Load
288
385
34%
228
-21%

Pro

+ Excelentes alto-falantes
+ Suporte sólido
+ Leitor de cartões microSD veloz
+ Carcaça robusta

Contra

- Desempenho Wi-Fi medíocre
- O modo Google Ambient automático não funciona com muita confiabilidade
- Desempenho médio do sistema
In review: Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab. Test unit provided by Lenovo Germany
In review: Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab. Test unit provided by Lenovo Germany

Como já foi dito na introdução, o Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab é um tanto único e diferente a seus rivais. Ele vem com um suporte embutido e um fundo muito grosso para incluir dois alto-falantes muito capazes e um suporte estável e resistente. Francamente, gostamos do design porque o tablet pode ser segurado de maneira muito conveniente na extremidade inferior confortavelmente grossa e aderente. Obviamente, ele não pode ser colocado sobre uma mesa.

O Yoga Smart Tab da Lenovo é adequado como um hub doméstico inteligente. No entanto, requer intervenção manual dos usuários de vez em quando.

O resto é mero padrão. Seu hardware de gama média é rápido o suficiente para aplicações diárias, mas não se destaca entre os concorrentes. Nem sua conectividade, apesar do leitor de cartões microSD um pouco mais rápido. Seu único recurso de venda exclusivo continua sendo o modo ambiente do Google. Graças aos seus três microfones, os comandos de voz podem ser detectados e compreendidos por todos os lados. Infelizmente, a ativação automática do modo ambiente mencionado ao desdobrar o suporte interno do tablet não funcionou em nossos testes, mesmo que ele tenha sido ativado nas configurações.

Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F - 01/14/2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
82 / 98 → 84%
Teclado
67 / 80 → 84%
Mouse
82%
Conectividade
40 / 70 → 58%
Peso
82 / 40-88 → 87%
Bateria
90%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
6 / 78 → 8%
Desempenho da aplicação
44 / 92 → 48%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
87 / 91 → 96%
Camera
38 / 85 → 45%
Médio
69%
79%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab: Google Assistant para pendurar
Mike Wobker, 2020-01-28 (Update: 2020-02- 2)