Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 (SM-T590N)

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Tanja Hinum-Balaz (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/20/2018

A real entertainer. O Galaxy Tab A 10.5 é a atualização da Samsung de seu tablet de gama média Galaxy Tab A 10.1. O dispositivo Android de 10,5 polegadas deve se destacar de sua concorrência com sua tela WUXGA, o som Dolby Atmos, um modo para crianças ideal para a família e longos tempos de duração de bateria.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Galaxy Tab A Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memória
3072 MB 
Pantalha
10.5 polegadas 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 216 PPI, capacitiva, IPS, Gorilla Glass 4, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22.5 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 400 GB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, bússola, Hall sensor, USB C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, body SAR 0.555 W/kg, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 260 x 161.1
Bateria
7300 mAh Lítio-Ion, Não pode ser trocada, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 15 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix flash, auto focus, videos com até 1920 x 1080 pixels @ 30 fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix vídeos aom até 1920 x 1080 pixels @ 30 fps
Características adicionais
Teclado: virtual, FOnte de alimentação modular, cabo USB (Type C para Type A), ferramenta SIM, guia rápido, informação da garantia, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
531 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g
Preço
329 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Medion Lifetab P10606
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s ∼100% +41%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
262 MBit/s ∼86% +21%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s ∼79% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
216 (min: 49, max: 250) MBit/s ∼71%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
85.2 MBit/s ∼28% -61%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 291, max: 325) MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
240 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Medion Lifetab P10606
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
186 MBit/s ∼60% -40%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
Mali-T720 MP2, MT8735, 16 GB eMMC Flash
84.9 MBit/s ∼27% -73%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø216 (49-250)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Adreno 506, 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø312 (291-325)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5: overview
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5: overview
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5: lake
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5: lake
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5: turning point
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: lake
Garmin Edge 500: lake
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
491
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
518
cd/m²
556
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
528
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
517
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 556 cd/m² Médio: 514.3 cd/m² Minimum: 4.46 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 556 cd/m²
Contraste: 1324:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.26
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.5
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
IPS, 1280x800, 10.1
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Medion Lifetab P10606
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
TFT, 1920x1200, 10.1
Screen
-177%
-52%
-60%
-185%
-57%
Brightness middle
556
340
-39%
392
-29%
426
-23%
326
-41%
542
-3%
Brightness
514
320
-38%
383
-25%
399
-22%
338
-34%
520
1%
Brightness Distribution
87
84
-3%
81
-7%
91
5%
92
6%
91
5%
Black Level *
0.42
0.19
55%
0.25
40%
0.38
10%
0.56
-33%
0.68
-62%
Contrast
1324
1789
35%
1568
18%
1121
-15%
582
-56%
797
-40%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.8
15
-733%
4.2
-133%
4.5
-150%
9.1
-406%
4.2
-133%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.2
22.8
-613%
11.2
-250%
7.9
-147%
18.2
-469%
6.7
-109%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.2
4
-82%
2.9
-32%
5.2
-136%
12
-445%
4.8
-118%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.09 105%
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
2.32 95%
2.42 91%
CCT
6819 95%
6940 94%
7115 91%
6875 95%
11359 57%
7434 87%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8781 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
54.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24.8 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
78980 Points ∼31% +43%
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=59)
71242 Points ∼28% +29%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
63777 Points ∼25% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (54731 - 60077, n=6)
57018 Points ∼22% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
55314 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
44191 Points ∼17% -20%
Medion Lifetab P10606
44015 Points ∼17% -20%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
34009 Points ∼13% -39%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 566378, n=17)
170590 Points ∼30% +142%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
77717 Points ∼14% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
70431 Points ∼12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (56497 - 71712, n=7)
68691 Points ∼12% -2%
Medion Lifetab P10606
44992 Points ∼8% -36%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
4827 Points ∼47% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4171 - 4759, n=7)
4525 Points ∼44% +8%
Average of class Tablet (2345 - 6315, n=26)
4260 Points ∼41% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
4171 Points ∼40%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points ∼36% -12%
Medion Lifetab P10606
3508 Points ∼34% -16%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
2980 Points ∼29% -29%
Work performance score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5843 Points ∼44% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4914 - 5656, n=7)
5264 Points ∼40% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
4914 Points ∼37%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points ∼37% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
4796 Points ∼36% -2%
Average of class Tablet (2529 - 7053, n=68)
4483 Points ∼34% -9%
Medion Lifetab P10606
4449 Points ∼34% -9%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
3948 Points ∼30% -20%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points ∼50% +10000%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
803 Points ∼39% +7930%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=98)
743 Points ∼37% +7330%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
682 Points ∼34% +6720%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
672 Points ∼33% +6620%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (10 - 814, n=7)
536 Points ∼26% +5260%
Medion Lifetab P10606
10 Points ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
10 Points ∼0%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=98)
2090 Points ∼7% +122%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (943 - 975, n=7)
961 Points ∼3% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
943 Points ∼3%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points ∼3% -12%
Medion Lifetab P10606
729 Points ∼3% -23%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
701 Points ∼2% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
511 Points ∼2% -46%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
292 Points ∼1% -69%
Memory
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points ∼24% +56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1362 Points ∼22% +41%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 5423, n=98)
1046 Points ∼17% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (770 - 1522, n=7)
978 Points ∼16% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
969 Points ∼15%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
968 Points ∼15% 0%
Medion Lifetab P10606
772 Points ∼12% -20%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
752 Points ∼12% -22%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2560 - 2898, n=7)
2701 Points ∼16% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
2561 Points ∼16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points ∼14% -9%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=98)
2259 Points ∼14% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
2240 Points ∼14% -13%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1957 Points ∼12% -24%
Medion Lifetab P10606
1744 Points ∼11% -32%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
1192 Points ∼7% -53%
Overall
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points ∼16% +237%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=98)
1217 Points ∼14% +213%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1016 Points ∼12% +161%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1015 Points ∼12% +161%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (389 - 1169, n=7)
936 Points ∼11% +141%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
647 Points ∼8% +66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
389 Points ∼5%
Medion Lifetab P10606
313 Points ∼4% -20%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score
Average of class Tablet (862 - 43802, n=24)
7773 Points ∼18%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3081 Points ∼7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2777 - 3362, n=5)
3065 Points ∼7%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2091 Points ∼5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points ∼4%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
1103 Points ∼3%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=37)
4647 Points ∼13% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3846 Points ∼11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3272 - 4022, n=7)
3820 Points ∼11% -1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points ∼9% -14%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
2489 Points ∼7% -35%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2477 Points ∼7% -36%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
1697 Points ∼5% -56%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=37)
1605 Points ∼25% +115%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1541 Points ∼24% +107%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points ∼19% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (741 - 778, n=7)
755 Points ∼12% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
745 Points ∼12%
Medion Lifetab P10606
658 Points ∼10% -12%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
588 Points ∼9% -21%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1521 - 1855, n=7)
1785 Points ∼43% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1775 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1646 Points ∼39% -7%
Average of class Tablet (793 - 2952, n=49)
1435 Points ∼34% -19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points ∼33% -23%
Medion Lifetab P10606
1221 Points ∼29% -31%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
860 Points ∼21% -52%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
843 Points ∼20% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Tablet (102 - 5384, n=49)
1174 Points ∼22% +223%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
557 Points ∼10% +53%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points ∼8% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (363 - 369, n=7)
366 Points ∼7% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
363 Points ∼7%
Medion Lifetab P10606
240 Points ∼4% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
235 Points ∼4% -35%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
108 Points ∼2% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Tablet (134 - 3806, n=54)
1031 Points ∼22% +134%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
602 Points ∼13% +37%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points ∼10% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (441 - 449, n=7)
444 Points ∼9% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
441 Points ∼9%
Medion Lifetab P10606
292 Points ∼6% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
290 Points ∼6% -34%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
134 Points ∼3% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1802 Points ∼43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1504 - 1833, n=7)
1771 Points ∼43% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1657 Points ∼40% -8%
Average of class Tablet (810 - 2952, n=52)
1368 Points ∼33% -24%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points ∼32% -25%
Medion Lifetab P10606
1199 Points ∼29% -33%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1128 Points ∼27% -37%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
810 Points ∼20% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (42 - 7525, n=52)
1603 Points ∼19% +130%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
884 Points ∼11% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (690 - 716, n=7)
701 Points ∼8% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
696 Points ∼8%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points ∼7% -14%
Medion Lifetab P10606
496 Points ∼6% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
388 Points ∼5% -44%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
167 Points ∼2% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average of class Tablet (53 - 4588, n=56)
1269 Points ∼20% +57%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
929 Points ∼14% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (800 - 824, n=7)
810 Points ∼13% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
806 Points ∼12%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points ∼11% -15%
Medion Lifetab P10606
570 Points ∼9% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
468 Points ∼7% -42%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
203 Points ∼3% -75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points ∼19% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
14147 Points ∼18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (13596 - 15177, n=6)
14128 Points ∼18% 0%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 39393, n=137)
12935 Points ∼16% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
12095 Points ∼15% -15%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
9729 Points ∼12% -31%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
9076 Points ∼11% -36%
Medion Lifetab P10606
8995 Points ∼11% -36%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 194856, n=137)
17880 Points ∼3% +45%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points ∼2% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12323 - 12550, n=6)
12445 Points ∼2% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
12323 Points ∼2%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11719 Points ∼2% -5%
Medion Lifetab P10606
9602 Points ∼2% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
6151 Points ∼1% -50%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4622 Points ∼1% -62%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 103813, n=138)
14752 Points ∼7% +16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points ∼6% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12604 - 12878, n=6)
12752 Points ∼6% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
12686 Points ∼6%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11209 Points ∼5% -12%
Medion Lifetab P10606
9460 Points ∼4% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
6905 Points ∼3% -46%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
5188 Points ∼2% -59%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 451, n=164)
29.6 fps ∼0% +41%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps ∼0% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
21 fps ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (21 - 22, n=7)
18.4 fps ∼0% -12%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
18 fps ∼0% -14%
Medion Lifetab P10606
16 fps ∼0% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
12 fps ∼0% -43%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
8.6 fps ∼0% -59%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (20 - 34, n=7)
23 fps ∼1% +15%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps ∼1% +5%
Average of class Tablet (3.7 - 120, n=168)
20.3 fps ∼1% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
20 fps ∼1%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
17 fps ∼1% -15%
Medion Lifetab P10606
15 fps ∼0% -25%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
14 fps ∼0% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
11 fps ∼0% -45%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 220, n=102)
19.9 fps ∼0% +116%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps ∼0% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
9.2 fps ∼0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.5 fps ∼0% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (9.2 - 9.4, n=7)
7.96 fps ∼0% -13%
Medion Lifetab P10606
7.1 fps ∼0% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
4.9 fps ∼0% -47%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
3.1 fps ∼0% -66%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average of class Tablet (2.9 - 110, n=105)
14.2 fps ∼0% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (8.8 - 18, n=7)
11.4 fps ∼0% +30%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps ∼0% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
8.8 fps ∼0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.3 fps ∼0% -6%
Medion Lifetab P10606
6.6 fps ∼0% -25%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
6.2 fps ∼0% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
4.5 fps ∼0% -49%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (2 - 173, n=52)
21.1 fps ∼0% +246%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
6.1 fps ∼0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6 fps ∼0% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (6 - 6.1, n=7)
5.2 fps ∼0% -15%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps ∼0% -20%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2.2 fps ∼0% -64%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
2 fps ∼0% -67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1.7 fps ∼0% -72%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (4.3 - 95, n=52)
13 fps ∼0% +128%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.7 - 13, n=7)
7.9 fps ∼0% +39%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5.7 fps ∼0% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
5.7 fps ∼0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps ∼0% -18%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4.3 fps ∼0% -25%
Medion Lifetab P10606
4.3 fps ∼0% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
2.8 fps ∼0% -51%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0 - 107, n=32)
14.9 fps ∼0% +338%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3.4 fps ∼0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3 fps ∼0% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 3.5, n=7)
2.93 fps ∼0% -14%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2.5 fps ∼0% -26%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼0% -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1.8 fps ∼0% -47%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (0 - 47, n=32)
8.25 fps ∼0% +150%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 7, n=7)
4.36 fps ∼0% +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3.3 fps ∼0%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3.1 fps ∼0% -6%
Medion Lifetab P10606
2.4 fps ∼0% -27%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼0% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
1.7 fps ∼0% -48%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) Mediatek MT8735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Medion Lifetab P10606 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
8897 Points ∼100% +118%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points ∼96% +110%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=155)
6345 Points ∼71% +56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
4078 Points ∼46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4078, n=7)
3927 Points ∼44% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98)
3855 Points ∼43% -5%
Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60)
3059 Points ∼34% -25%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59)
2290 Points ∼26% -44%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
137 Points ∼100% +38%
Average of class Tablet (36 - 386, n=71)
109 Points ∼80% +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
99 Points ∼72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 99, n=4)
93 Points ∼68% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98)
65 Points ∼47% -34%
Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60)
63 Points ∼46% -36%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59)
54 Points ∼39% -45%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=70)
55.7 Points ∼100% +152%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
47.337 Points ∼85% +114%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
46.39 Points ∼83% +110%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98)
23.712 Points ∼43% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.6, n=7)
22.2 Points ∼40% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
22.084 Points ∼40%
Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60)
18.873 Points ∼34% -15%
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59)
15.407 Points ∼28% -30%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML) (Chrome 59)
13705 ms * ∼100% -19%
Medion Lifetab P10606 (Chrome 60)
12793.8 ms * ∼93% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11370 - 11863, n=7)
11570 ms * ∼84% -0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
11529.2 ms * ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98)
9788.7 ms * ∼71% +15%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=166)
9352 ms * ∼68% +19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3975.5 ms * ∼29% +66%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
3756.1 ms * ∼27% +67%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590NAcer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)Amazon Fire HD 10 2017Medion Lifetab P10606Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-29%
-41%
-23%
-15%
-33%
-13%
-54%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
56.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
34.9
-42%
30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-50%
64.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
50.09 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-17%
47.1 (3.4 - 87.1, n=111)
-22%
42.5 (14.6 - 73.8, n=41)
-30%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
80.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
80.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
40.9
-49%
55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-31%
79.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
75.54 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
66.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=111)
-18%
60.8 (34.4 - 87.7, n=41)
-25%
Random Write 4KB
13.39
8.77
-35%
9.8
-27%
9.37
-30%
12.02
-10%
10.01
-25%
18.9 (0.75 - 77.3, n=149)
41%
5.48 (0.13 - 77.9, n=191)
-59%
Random Read 4KB
71.13
13.7
-81%
23
-68%
27.72
-61%
34.59
-51%
23.46
-67%
36.2 (3.59 - 117, n=149)
-49%
17.4 (1.32 - 142, n=191)
-76%
Sequential Write 256KB
103.32
92.38
-11%
66
-36%
147.67
43%
74.24
-28%
45.88
-56%
94.6 (14.8 - 189, n=149)
-8%
34.5 (2.04 - 208, n=191)
-67%
Sequential Read 256KB
285.63
173.7
-39%
216
-24%
262.2
-8%
274.74
-4%
215.76
-24%
230 (25.8 - 440, n=149)
-19%
104 (6.75 - 741, n=191)
-64%
Shadow Fight 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high50 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
comparado com
Motorola Moto X Play (min)
 615 MSM8939, Adreno 405
30
   ...
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
 Kirin 960s, Mali-G71 MP8
30
Huawei Y6 2018
 425, Adreno 308
39
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
 450, Adreno 506
50
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
 625, Adreno 506
53
Motorola One
 625, Adreno 506
54
   ...
OnePlus 6T (max)
 845, Adreno 630
60
PUBG Mobile
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 Balanced26 fps
Carga Máxima
 30.7 °C29.6 °C34 °C 
 28.6 °C26.2 °C34.5 °C 
 25.8 °C26.1 °C35 °C 
Máximo: 35 °C
Médio: 30.1 °C
28.5 °C28.1 °C30.5 °C
28.3 °C26.8 °C30.5 °C
30 °C27 °C26.1 °C
Máximo: 30.5 °C
Médio: 28.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  26.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.8 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.3 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203231.72527.622.53125.324.64026.920.75036.430.36325.926.58021.52710027.120.812524.522.316015.742.22001746.825017.556.131518.461.240016.26350014.669.863015.272.580014.772.7100014.572.9125014.271.7160013.971.7200013.868.6250014.466.5315013.963.1400014.260.6500014.561.7630014.864800014.664.31000014.959.9125001557.1160001551.5SPL26.880.7N0.947.9median 14.8median 63Delta1.57.537.932.437.930.931.330.934.231.734.233.72633.731.439.431.430.436.230.431.628.631.625.125.425.126.921.326.932.823.332.842.522.542.549.322.449.356.121.356.160.618.460.666.117.566.170.517.570.573.217.273.277.216.877.276.917.376.975.517.475.574.516.674.575.417.375.475.317.675.380.317.680.380.517.780.579.717.479.781.717.781.776.917.976.969.818.169.863.818.163.889.429.889.479.21.379.2median 73.2median 17.7median 73.211.91.611.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590NSamsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.42 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.28 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.26 / 4.22 / 4.29 Watt
Carga midlight 5.48 / 6.57 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
7300 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4680 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Medion Lifetab P10606
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
7300 mAh
Power Consumption
-74%
22%
-20%
-31%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
1.26
3.21
-155%
0.76
40%
1.55
-23%
1.4
-11%
1.18
6%
Idle Average *
4.22
5.97
-41%
3.23
23%
4.17
1%
4.17
1%
4.65
-10%
Idle Maximum *
4.29
6.19
-44%
3.35
22%
4.25
1%
4.2
2%
4.74
-10%
Load Average *
5.48
9.72
-77%
4.79
13%
7.13
-30%
7.5
-37%
5.75
-5%
Load Maximum *
6.57
9.97
-52%
5.72
13%
9.63
-47%
13.71
-109%
6.97
-6%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
32h 40min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 03min
Carga (máximo brilho)
6h 25min
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
7300 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Asus ZenPad 10 (Z301ML)
4680 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Medion Lifetab P10606
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585
7300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-59%
-35%
-40%
-12%
7%
Reader / Idle
1960
735
-62%
1321
-33%
960
-51%
1506
-23%
2634
34%
H.264
963
622
-35%
585
-39%
660
-31%
893
-7%
WiFi v1.3
938
387
-59%
467
-50%
542
-42%
796
-15%
826
-12%
Load
385
175
-55%
302
-22%
274
-29%
463
20%
428
11%

Pro

+ Traseira emborrachada e anti deslizante
+ Porta USB-C
+ Android 8.1
+ Modo crianças
+ GPS preciso
+ Tela WUXGA brilhante e bem equilibrada
+ Permanece frio durante o uso
+ Som Surround
+ Durações de bateria muito longas
+ Fonte de alimentação de carga rápida

Contra

- Sem leitor de digitais
- Correções de segurança Android não totalmente atualizadas
- Câmera média
- Engasgos ocasionais durante o uso
- Nem todos os jogos rodam fluentemente
Reviewed: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5. Test unit provided by Cyberport.
Reviewed: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5. Test unit provided by Cyberport.

O Galaxy Tab A 10.5 é um ótimo tablet de gama média da Samsung. A versão Wi-Fi está disponível por um preço online de cerca de $330 no momento da redação e oferece uma tela colorida de 10,5 polegadas com resolução de 1920x1200. Pode ser descrito como um companheiro de viagem duradouro que oferece desempenho suficiente para o uso diário. Se você está sempre em movimento, você pode querer considerar a versão LTE do Galaxy Tab A 10.5. Por favor, note que a versão LTE não está disponível nos EUA no momento da redação.

Uma atualização bem sucedida: O Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 é um bom tablet multimídia que tem muito a oferecer, considerando sua faixa de preço.

O tablet pode ser facilmente usado para jogos, contanto que os usuários possam aceitar baixar um pouco os detalhes gráficos quando necessário. Os alto-falantes Dolby Atmos compensam essa fraqueza oferecendo um ótimo som. O modo kids opcional torna o tablet da Samsung adequado para ser usado como um tablet de família.

Existem apenas alguns pontos de crítica para este tablet. O mais importante é o fato de que a câmera só pode ser usada para fotos ocasionais, embora a qualidade ainda seja suficiente para chats de vídeo e selfies O Galaxy Tab A 10.5 não inclui um leitor de digitais, mas suporta identificação via reconhecimento facial. Nós esperávamos por correções de segurança mais regulares do Android.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N - 10/12/2018 v6
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
75 / 80 → 93%
Mouse
90%
Conectividade
39 / 65 → 60%
Peso
83 / 40-88 → 89%
Bateria
98%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
26 / 68 → 39%
Desempenho da aplicação
44 / 76 → 57%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
82 / 91 → 90%
Camera
56 / 85 → 66%
Médio
74%
86%
Tablet - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 (SM-T590N)
Manuel Masiero, 2018-10-20 (Update: 2018-10-23)