Notebookcheck

Em Análise Samsung Galaxy A70: Gigante da Gama Média

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 06/15/2019

Ataque completo. Câmera tripla de 32 MP, 128 GB de armazenamento interno, uma bateria de 4.500 mAh e uma tela de 6,7 polegadas - a Samsung está prestes a redefinir o smartphone de gama média com seu mais recente Galaxy A70, que pode ser confundido com um candidato de alta qualidade . Descubra em nossa análise se vale a pena comprar ou não o smartphone de menos de $ 400.

Samsung Galaxy A70 (Galaxy A Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 612
Memória
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4X, 1,866 MHz
Pantalha
6.7 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, capacitiva, Super AMOLED, FHD+, 16 million colors, Gorilla Glass 3, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 106.9 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio de 3,5-mm e via adaptador USB-C, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: giroscópio, acelerômetro, sensor geomagnético, sensor hall, sensor de proximidade, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, Voice over LTE, Voice over Wi-Fi, Wi-Fi Direct
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g (a/b/g), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz), 3G (850, 900, 1,900, 2,100 MHz), LTE Cat.11 (B1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41), downloads/uploads up to 600/75 MBit/s, Dual-SIM, head SAR 0,349 W/kg, body SAR 1,475 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 164.3 x 76.7
Bateria
4500 mAh Lítio-Ion, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 28 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 32 MPix Câmera tripla: 32 MP wide-angle (1/2.8"/F1.7), 5 MP bokeh camera (1/5.0"/F2.2), 8 MP ultra-wide-angle (1/4.0"/F2.2), autofocus, 8x optical zoom, video stabilizer, videos up to [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix 1/2.8", F/2.0, wide-angle, selfie light
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Um só alto-falante voltado para baixo, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação modular, cabo USB (Type-C para Type-C), adaptador de 3,5-mm USB-C, headset, SIM tool, Android 9, One UI 1.1, 24 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
183 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g
Preço
399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

167 mm 73 mm 8.3 mm 180 g164.3 mm 76.7 mm 7.9 mm 183 g159.5 mm 75 mm 8.1 mm 184 g159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g152.9 mm 72.7 mm 7.4 mm 159 g147.5 mm 70.5 mm 7.45 mm 155 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy A70
Adreno 612, 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
338 (min: 302, max: 356) MBit/s ∼100%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
335 (min: 267, max: 343) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
317 (min: 163, max: 343) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
311 (min: 214, max: 346) MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (min: 265, max: 284) MBit/s ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=423)
224 MBit/s ∼66% -34%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
188 (min: 45, max: 237) MBit/s ∼56% -44%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (min: 164, max: 362) MBit/s ∼100% +21%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash
308 (min: 302, max: 312) MBit/s ∼96% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
279 (min: 229, max: 303) MBit/s ∼87% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A70
Adreno 612, 675, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
264 (min: 221, max: 293) MBit/s ∼83%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
218 (min: 95, max: 239) MBit/s ∼68% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=423)
214 MBit/s ∼67% -19%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
153 (min: 133, max: 180) MBit/s ∼48% -42%
Samsung Galaxy A70: overview
Samsung Galaxy A70: overview
Samsung Galaxy A70: lake
Samsung Galaxy A70: lake
Samsung Galaxy A70: turning point
Samsung Galaxy A70: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: lake
Garmin Edge 500: lake
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
545
cd/m²
552
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
556
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 557 cd/m² Médio: 552.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.72 cd/m²
iluminação: 98 %
iluminação com acumulador: 554 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
98% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.08
Samsung Galaxy A70
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
Huawei P30 Lite
IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.15
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
IPS, 2520x1080, 6.5
Wiko View 3 Pro
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.97
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
Screen
15%
-33%
-25%
23%
30%
Brightness middle
554
451
-19%
572
3%
459
-17%
583
5%
570
3%
Brightness
552
430
-22%
580
5%
450
-18%
577
5%
565
2%
Brightness Distribution
98
90
-8%
96
-2%
90
-8%
97
-1%
93
-5%
Black Level *
0.55
0.4
0.39
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.3
1.4
58%
4.5
-36%
4.8
-45%
1.6
52%
1.5
55%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.2
4.4
52%
12.2
-33%
9.2
-0%
3.9
58%
3.6
61%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.4
2.5
26%
7.9
-132%
5.5
-62%
2.7
21%
1.2
65%
Gamma
2.08 106%
2.22 99%
2.16 102%
2.26 97%
2.27 97%
2.07 106%
CCT
6606 98%
6422 101%
8726 74%
7494 87%
6267 104%
6504 100%
Contrast
820
1430
1177

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9418 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.8 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
6104 Points ∼84%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3551 Points ∼49% -42%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4278 Points ∼59% -30%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5309 Points ∼73% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
7282 Points ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4026 Points ∼55% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
6104 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=317)
4676 Points ∼64% -23%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
6446 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5429 Points ∼84% -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4804 Points ∼75% -25%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
5743 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5975 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4429 Points ∼69% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
6446 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=376)
4682 Points ∼73% -27%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2380 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1544 Points ∼65% -35%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1346 Points ∼57% -43%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1487 Points ∼62% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1875 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1525 Points ∼64% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
2380 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=376)
1413 Points ∼59% -41%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
7315 Points ∼98%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6483 Points ∼87% -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6018 Points ∼80% -18%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7486 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
6832 Points ∼91% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5387 Points ∼72% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
7315 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=367)
5225 Points ∼70% -29%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
9288 Points ∼86%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8125 Points ∼76% -13%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7181 Points ∼67% -23%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
10757 Points ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
8346 Points ∼78% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5625 Points ∼52% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
9288 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14439, n=538)
5652 Points ∼53% -39%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2482 Points ∼93%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2282 Points ∼85% -8%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2518 Points ∼94% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2338 Points ∼87% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
2482 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=54)
2680 Points ∼100% +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
914 Points ∼34%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
809 Points ∼30% -11%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
997 Points ∼37% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1907 Points ∼71% +109%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
914 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=54)
2699 Points ∼100% +195%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1063 Points ∼43%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
944 Points ∼38% -11%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1152 Points ∼47% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1988 Points ∼81% +87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
1063 Points ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=54)
2460 Points ∼100% +131%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2719 Points ∼93%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2550 Points ∼87% -6%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2345 Points ∼80% -14%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2918 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼86% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1845 Points ∼63% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
2719 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=373)
1938 Points ∼66% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
949 Points ∼44%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
843 Points ∼39% -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
862 Points ∼40% -9%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
993 Points ∼46% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼100% +126%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
629 Points ∼29% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
949 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8206, n=373)
1701 Points ∼79% +79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1110 Points ∼50%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
981 Points ∼44% -12%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1003 Points ∼45% -10%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1164 Points ∼53% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼100% +100%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
737 Points ∼33% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
1110 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6312, n=374)
1589 Points ∼72% +43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2727 Points ∼93%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2578 Points ∼88% -5%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2352 Points ∼80% -14%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2924 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼86% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1871 Points ∼64% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
2727 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=403)
1857 Points ∼64% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1571 Points ∼68%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1336 Points ∼58% -15%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1397 Points ∼60% -11%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1605 Points ∼69% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼93% +37%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
954 Points ∼41% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
1571 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=403)
2310 Points ∼100% +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1734 Points ∼78%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1494 Points ∼67% -14%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1536 Points ∼69% -11%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1784 Points ∼80% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼100% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1071 Points ∼48% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
1734 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=403)
1944 Points ∼88% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2886 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2489 Points ∼86% -14%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2351 Points ∼81% -19%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2528 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1821 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
2886 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=453)
1847 Points ∼64% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
823 Points ∼42%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
819 Points ∼41% 0%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
808 Points ∼41% -2%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
986 Points ∼50% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼100% +141%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
634 Points ∼32% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
823 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 6362, n=453)
1413 Points ∼71% +72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
978 Points ∼47%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
963 Points ∼46% -2%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
946 Points ∼46% -3%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1141 Points ∼55% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼100% +112%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
741 Points ∼36% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
978 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 5734, n=454)
1365 Points ∼66% +40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2869 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2490 Points ∼87% -13%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2349 Points ∼82% -18%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2720 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1829 Points ∼64% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
2869 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4454, n=494)
1714 Points ∼60% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1427 Points ∼72%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1256 Points ∼63% -12%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1327 Points ∼67% -7%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1593 Points ∼80% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼100% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
845 Points ∼43% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
1427 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=493)
1844 Points ∼93% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1606 Points ∼77%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1414 Points ∼68% -12%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1469 Points ∼71% -9%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1755 Points ∼85% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼100% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
960 Points ∼46% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
1606 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=496)
1603 Points ∼77% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
15948 Points ∼66%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12023 Points ∼50% -25%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
24165 Points ∼100% +52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13686 Points ∼57% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13914 Points ∼58% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
15948 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=655)
13978 Points ∼58% -12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
26348 Points ∼61%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21643 Points ∼50% -18%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
21847 Points ∼50% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
43514 Points ∼100% +65%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15567 Points ∼36% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
26348 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=653)
21146 Points ∼49% -20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
23013 Points ∼78%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
18377 Points ∼63% -20%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
22323 Points ∼76% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
29316 Points ∼100% +27%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15167 Points ∼52% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
23013 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=653)
17322 Points ∼59% -25%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
41 fps ∼55%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
33 fps ∼45% -20%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼47% -15%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
38 fps ∼51% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
74 fps ∼100% +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
41 fps ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=677)
36.9 fps ∼50% -10%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
37 fps ∼64%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
31 fps ∼53% -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
30 fps ∼52% -19%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
34 fps ∼59% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
37 fps ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=686)
27.7 fps ∼48% -25%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
20 fps ∼56%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
17 fps ∼47% -15%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼44% -20%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
20 fps ∼56% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
36 fps ∼100% +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
20 fps ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=583)
21.1 fps ∼59% +6%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
19 fps ∼58%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
16 fps ∼48% -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
13 fps ∼39% -32%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
19 fps ∼58% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
19 fps ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=592)
19 fps ∼58% 0%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
15 fps ∼58%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼46% -20%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼38% -33%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
12 fps ∼46% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
26 fps ∼100% +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
15 fps ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=449)
17.3 fps ∼67% +15%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
13 fps ∼54%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
11 fps ∼46% -15%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
8.4 fps ∼35% -35%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
11 fps ∼46% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
13 fps ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=451)
16.4 fps ∼68% +26%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
4.7 fps ∼48%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.2 fps ∼42% -11%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
3.2 fps ∼32% -32%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
4.3 fps ∼43% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
9.1 fps ∼92% +94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
4.7 fps ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=167)
9.89 fps ∼100% +110%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
3 fps ∼44%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼38% -13%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.2 fps ∼32% -27%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
2.7 fps ∼39% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5.8 fps ∼85% +93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
3 fps ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=166)
6.84 fps ∼100% +128%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
8 fps ∼56%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼44% -20%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4.9 fps ∼34% -39%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7 fps ∼49% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼97% +75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
8 fps ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=171)
14.4 fps ∼100% +80%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
9 fps ∼56%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼44% -22%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.1 fps ∼38% -32%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.5 fps ∼47% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
9 fps ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=171)
16 fps ∼100% +78%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
8 fps ∼53%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.9 fps ∼46% -14%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼42% -21%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
7.4 fps ∼49% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
15 fps ∼100% +88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
8 fps ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=374)
11.8 fps ∼79% +48%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
7 fps ∼54%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.5 fps ∼50% -7%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.1 fps ∼39% -27%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
6.8 fps ∼52% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼100% +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
7 fps ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=378)
10.6 fps ∼82% +51%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
8.51 fps ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14.23 (min: 8.05, max: 26.52) fps ∼84% +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
8.51 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.24 - 37.4, n=59)
17 fps ∼100% +100%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
6.56 fps ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
12.76 (min: 7.68, max: 27.7) fps ∼90% +95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
6.56 fps ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 37.3, n=53)
14.2 fps ∼100% +116%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
7.52 fps ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14.18 (min: 8.4, max: 36.6) fps ∼81% +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
7.52 fps ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 39.7, n=50)
17.5 fps ∼100% +133%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
167836 Points ∼94%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
132834 Points ∼74% -21%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117574 Points ∼66% -30%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
138589 Points ∼77% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
179353 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
122826 Points ∼68% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
167836 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 459850, n=285)
139075 Points ∼78% -17%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1262 Score ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1966 Score ∼92% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
1262 Score ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 5025, n=57)
2139 Score ∼100% +69%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
1259 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1024 Points ∼81% -19%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1046 Points ∼83% -17%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1146 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1172 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1090 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
1259 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=621)
751 Points ∼60% -40%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2272 Points ∼66%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1478 Points ∼43% -35%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1611 Points ∼47% -29%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1590 Points ∼46% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3453 Points ∼100% +52%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1356 Points ∼39% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
2272 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=621)
1986 Points ∼58% -13%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
3285 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3036 Points ∼92% -8%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1236 Points ∼38% -62%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1958 Points ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2969 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2445 Points ∼74% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
3285 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=621)
1487 Points ∼45% -55%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
6137 Points ∼100%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5146 Points ∼84% -16%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4342 Points ∼71% -29%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
3915 Points ∼64% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5932 Points ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4506 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
6137 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=621)
2910 Points ∼47% -53%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
2756 Points ∼95%
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2201 Points ∼76% -20%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1734 Points ∼60% -37%
Wiko View 3 Pro
Mediatek Helio P60, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144
1933 Points ∼67% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2906 Points ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2009 Points ∼69% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
2756 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=621)
1460 Points ∼50% -47%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A70
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675, Adreno 612, 6144
322 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
517 Points ∼71% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
322 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=102)
730 Points ∼100% +127%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
43.423 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
43.4 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.214 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 108, n=94)
31.9 Points ∼73% -27%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.781 Points ∼73% -27%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
25.96 Points ∼60% -40%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
41.4 runs/min ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
41.4 runs/min ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.5 runs/min ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=84)
34.9 runs/min ∼84% -16%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.7 runs/min ∼77% -23%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
27.4 runs/min ∼66% -34%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
82 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
82 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
72 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
66 Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=150)
64.2 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points ∼70% -30%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
54 Points ∼66% -34%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)
53 Points ∼65% -35%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
15716 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
15716 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
13562 Points ∼86% -14%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
9779 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points ∼58% -42%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)
8778 Points ∼56% -44%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
8163 Points ∼52% -48%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 43280, n=677)
6450 Points ∼41% -59%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=702)
10678 ms * ∼100% -280%
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73)
4739 ms * ∼44% -69%
Wiko View 3 Pro (Chrome 74)
4447.6 ms * ∼42% -58%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
4137.8 ms * ∼39% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4122.8 ms * ∼39% -47%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
2911.8 ms * ∼27% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
2807 ms * ∼26% -0%
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157)
2806.8 ms * ∼26%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy A70Huawei P30 LiteSony Xperia 10 PlusWiko View 3 ProXiaomi Mi 9 SESamsung Galaxy A7 2018 Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
37%
-13%
-3%
2%
-21%
18%
-31%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.78 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
15%
58.44 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
60.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
3%
64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
56.8 (33.6 - 70.2, n=5)
-3%
49 (3.4 - 87.1, n=410)
-17%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
83.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
77.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
2%
78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
73.9 (54 - 83.4, n=5)
-3%
67.2 (8.1 - 96.5, n=410)
-12%
Random Write 4KB
21.95
87.29
298%
16.77
-24%
31.2
42%
21.86
0%
15.45
-30%
47.6 (13.5 - 150, n=8)
117%
21.3 (0.14 - 250, n=730)
-3%
Random Read 4KB
103.8
71.57
-31%
77.67
-25%
89.67
-14%
115.83
12%
83.98
-19%
113 (88.4 - 173, n=8)
9%
46.1 (1.59 - 196, n=730)
-56%
Sequential Write 256KB
193.97
158.63
-18%
205.19
6%
171.57
-12%
190.1
-2%
104.87
-46%
172 (143 - 194, n=8)
-11%
94.6 (2.99 - 590, n=730)
-51%
Sequential Read 256KB
508.48
293.23
-42%
280.34
-45%
302.74
-40%
492.48
-3%
295.76
-42%
491 (409 - 733, n=8)
-3%
266 (12.1 - 1504, n=730)
-48%
Asphalt 9 (High)
0102030Tooltip
; 1.5.4a: Ø15.2 (9-23)
Asphalt 9 (Standard)
0102030Tooltip
; 1.5.4a: Ø19.6 (14-29)
Shadow Fight 3
0102030405060Tooltip
; 1.18.5: Ø59.2 (12-60)
Dead Trigger 2
0102030405060Tooltip
; 1.5.5: Ø59.6 (30-60)
Carga Máxima
 37.4 °C37 °C33.4 °C 
 36.9 °C34.8 °C32.6 °C 
 36.3 °C36.2 °C33 °C 
Máximo: 37.4 °C
Médio: 35.3 °C
32.4 °C34.2 °C35.5 °C
31.8 °C33.1 °C36 °C
32.1 °C33.3 °C36 °C
Máximo: 36 °C
Médio: 33.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  27.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.833.82525.532.53127.524.44022.328.45028.532.66318.925.78020.224.910021.621.412518.718.916020.232.520017.136.725014.646.331515.955.640015.459.150016.56263014.264.280014.569.6100013.368.7125013.469.8160013.672.3200014.271.6250014.672315013.673.7400014.477500014.574.4630014.275.8800014.677.21000014.874.61250014.967.31600015.258.3SPL26.585.3N0.861.5median 14.6median 68.7Delta0.811.330.733.82528.726.828.426.328.729.838.227.424.72123.219.525.818.825.719.240.417.641.316.947.415.855.51556.71562.814.766.914.86814.666.514.369.213.471.814.472.514.473.214.876.61577.714.875.314.774.31575.314.972.815.264.515.755.126.885.50.961.4median 15median 66.91.210.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A70Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A70 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.14 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.66 / 1.69 / 1.8 Watt
Carga midlight 3.42 / 5.88 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A70
4500 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
3000 mAh
Wiko View 3 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-36%
-14%
0%
22%
-11%
Idle Minimum *
0.66
0.91
-38%
0.68
-3%
0.77
-17%
0.53
20%
0.71
-8%
Idle Average *
1.69
2.41
-43%
2.12
-25%
1.79
-6%
1.18
30%
1.36
20%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
2.43
-35%
2.17
-21%
1.86
-3%
1.2
33%
1.47
18%
Load Average *
3.42
4.57
-34%
3.82
-12%
2.74
20%
3.04
11%
5.13
-50%
Load Maximum *
5.88
7.57
-29%
6.44
-10%
5.53
6%
4.83
18%
7.89
-34%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
43h 20min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 37min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 53min
Samsung Galaxy A70
4500 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Sony Xperia 10 Plus
3000 mAh
Wiko View 3 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-34%
-33%
20%
-27%
-18%
Reader / Idle
2600
1248
-52%
1400
-46%
1374
-47%
1467
-44%
H.264
1117
685
-39%
701
-37%
853
-24%
836
-25%
WiFi v1.3
736
515
-30%
635
-14%
886
20%
510
-31%
605
-18%
Load
233
198
-15%
154
-34%
218
-6%
273
17%

Pro

+ Carcaça robusta e fina
+ Conector para fones de 3,5 mm
+ Dual SIM, VoLTE, VoWifi, LTE Cat. 11
+ Bom GPS
+ 128 GB de armazenamento interno
+ Wi-Fi rápido
+ Tela Super AMOLED brilhante
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Fonte de alimentação de carga rápida

Contra

- Sem certificação IP
- Câmera tripla apenas medíocre na melhor das hipóteses
- PWM flickering
- Desempenho medíocre dos jogos
- Afogamento sob uso intenso
In review: Samsung Galaxy A70. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Samsung Galaxy A70. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

O Samsung Galaxy A70 é um smartphone decente. No entanto, está tendo muitas dificuldade em se destacar entre a enorme variedade de smartphones de gama média, apesar de seu hardware impressionante.

Sua elegante carcaça com a tela Super AMOLED de alta resolução 20:9 de 6,7 polegadas é certamente uma grande vantagem, assim como seus recursos de conectividade, sua longa duração de bateria, seus recursos de Dual SIM e seu espaçoso armazenamento interno.

Ótimo hardware com desempenho e qualidade de câmera medíocres - esperamos mais de um smartphone de $ 400.

O que nos leva a suas desvantagens. O desempenho do A70 é decente o suficiente para aplicativos e tarefas cotidianas, mas é muito lento para os jogos atuais. Na sua faixa de preço de aproximadamente $ 400, teríamos esperado mais do A70. A câmera tripla também foi um pouco decepcionante, já que se mostrou bastante decente comente em plena luz do dia.

Uma boa alternativa para o Samsung Galaxy A70 é o Xiaomi's Mi 9 SE. Com sua tela AMOLED de 5,97 polegadas, ele pode ser um pouco menor, mas é mais barato, mais rápido e oferece uma melhor câmera tripla, para começar.

Samsung Galaxy A70 - 06/14/2019 v6(old)
Manuel Masiero

Acabamento
85%
Teclado
67 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
40 / 60 → 67%
Peso
90%
Bateria
97%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
50 / 63 → 80%
Desempenho da aplicação
68 / 70 → 97%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
65 / 91 → 71%
Camera
76%
Médio
77%
86%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Em Análise Samsung Galaxy A70: Gigante da Gama Média
Manuel Masiero, 2019-06-15 (Update: 2019-06-18)