Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P30 Lite

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/24/2019

Obra-prima de fotografia de gama média? O smartphone mais vendido a partir do 3º trimestre de 2018 recebe outra reencarnação. A Huawei chama o P30 Lite de uma obra-prima fotográfica com uma câmera tripla "revolucionária". Descubra se esta câmera de 48 MP é capaz de redefinir a fotografia de smartphones de gama média em nossa análise do Huawei P30 Lite.

Huawei P30 Lite (P Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 710
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
6.15 polegadas 19.27:9, 2312 x 1080 pixel 415 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS LCD, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 108 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartões microSD de até 512 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de proximidade, acelerômetro, bússola, giroscópio, efeito hall, OTG, Miracast, Status-LED
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, 4G LTE TDD: B38, 4G LTE FDD: B1 / B3 / B4 / B7 / B7 / B8 / B20, 3G WCDMA: B1 / B2 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B8, 2G: B2 / B3 / B5 / B8, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.4 x 152.9 x 72.7
Bateria
3340 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 21 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48 MP (wide-angle lens, f/1.8 aperture) + 8 MP (ultra-wide-angle lens) + 2 MP (bokeh lens), Camera2 API: Limited
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix 24 MP, apertura f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono, Teclado: on-screen, Fones, carregador, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, guia de início rápido, capa protetora da tela, cartão de garantia, EMUI 9.0, 24 Meses Garantia, head SAR: 1.23 W/kg, body SAR: 1.19 W/kg, LTE Cat. 12 (600/100 Mbps), DRM Widevine: L1, fanless
peso
159 g, Suprimento de energia: 54 g
Preço
369 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review

Size Comparison

158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.7 mm 166 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 176 g156 mm 68 mm 8.4 mm 162 g155.5 mm 75.2 mm 8.8 mm 182 g154.8 mm 75.8 mm 8 mm 180 g154.9 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 175 g152.9 mm 72.7 mm 7.4 mm 159 g147.5 mm 70.5 mm 7.45 mm 155 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +259%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 444, max: 499) MBit/s ∼73% +161%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 (min: 326, max: 341) MBit/s ∼49% +78%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
332 (min: 314, max: 341) MBit/s ∼49% +77%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 273, max: 341) MBit/s ∼46% +66%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
311 (min: 214, max: 346) MBit/s ∼46% +65%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼44% +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=417)
223 MBit/s ∼33% +19%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
188 (min: 45, max: 237) MBit/s ∼28%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼100% +197%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
429 (min: 256, max: 448) MBit/s ∼66% +97%
Nokia 8.1
Adreno 616, 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash
300 (min: 169, max: 367) MBit/s ∼46% +38%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
288 (min: 138, max: 294) MBit/s ∼45% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Adreno 616, 712, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
279 (min: 229, max: 303) MBit/s ∼43% +28%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼42% +25%
Sony Xperia 10
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
253 (min: 128, max: 283) MBit/s ∼39% +16%
Huawei P30 Lite
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
218 (min: 95, max: 239) MBit/s ∼34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=417)
213 MBit/s ∼33% -2%
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Garmin Edge 500
GPS test Huawei P30 Lite
GPS test Huawei P30 Lite
GPS test Huawei P30 Lite
GPS test Huawei P30 Lite
GPS test Huawei P30 Lite
GPS test Huawei P30 Lite
Photo mode
Photo mode
Wide-angle mode
Wide-angle mode
2x zoom
2x zoom
Aperture mode
Aperture mode
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review
Huawei P30 Lite Smartphone Review
412
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 456 cd/m² Médio: 430.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.05 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 451 cd/m²
Contraste: 820:1 (Preto: 0.55 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Huawei P30 Lite
IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.15
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.97
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Xiaomi Mi 8
AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.21
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Nokia 8.1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Sony Xperia 10
IPS-LCD, 2520x1080, 6
Screen
10%
-79%
-21%
-63%
-18%
-40%
-37%
Brightness middle
451
583
29%
537
19%
489
8%
430
-5%
644
43%
567
26%
547
21%
Brightness
430
577
34%
525
22%
486
13%
434
1%
628
46%
547
27%
525
22%
Brightness Distribution
90
97
8%
85
-6%
93
3%
94
4%
91
1%
92
2%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.55
0.58
-5%
0.34
38%
0.61
-11%
0.36
35%
Contrast
820
926
13%
1438
75%
930
13%
1519
85%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.4
1.6
-14%
6.41
-358%
3.8
-171%
5.09
-264%
2.64
-89%
4.39
-214%
4.6
-229%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.4
3.9
11%
10.86
-147%
7.1
-61%
8.05
-83%
9.23
-110%
7.28
-65%
12.1
-175%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
2.7
-8%
6.7
-168%
4.4
-76%
3.3
-32%
2.5
-0%
4.9
-96%
3.9
-56%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.27 97%
2.099 105%
2.22 99%
2.257 97%
2.024 109%
2.248 98%
2.17 101%
CCT
6422 101%
6267 104%
8310 78%
7213 90%
7026 93%
6649 98%
7642 85%
7158 91%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9448 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.8 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
54.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 28.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3551 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
7282 Points ∼51% +105%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4287 Points ∼30% +21%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14369 Points ∼100% +305%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13371 Points ∼93% +277%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4913 Points ∼34% +38%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6813 Points ∼47% +92%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3763 Points ∼26% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2631 - 4083, n=9)
3500 Points ∼24% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=316)
4562 Points ∼32% +28%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5429 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5975 Points ∼65% +10%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4992 Points ∼54% -8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9182 Points ∼100% +69%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8907 Points ∼97% +64%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5605 Points ∼61% +3%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5856 Points ∼64% +8%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3986 Points ∼43% -27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5266 - 5615, n=9)
5457 Points ∼59% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=374)
4587 Points ∼50% -16%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1544 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1875 Points ∼76% +21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1337 Points ∼54% -13%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2468 Points ∼100% +60%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2430 Points ∼98% +57%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1721 Points ∼70% +11%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1799 Points ∼73% +17%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
837 Points ∼34% -46%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1523 - 1614, n=9)
1561 Points ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=376)
1369 Points ∼55% -11%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6483 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
6832 Points ∼84% +5%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6277 Points ∼77% -3%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8101 Points ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7983 Points ∼99% +23%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼72% -10%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
6887 Points ∼85% +6%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5987 Points ∼74% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (5803 - 7141, n=9)
5669 Points ∼70% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=370)
5030 Points ∼62% -22%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8125 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
8346 Points ∼86% +3%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7618 Points ∼79% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9664 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9689 Points ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼73% -13%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8309 Points ∼86% +2%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4948 Points ∼51% -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (7004 - 9424, n=9)
8073 Points ∼83% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=538)
5516 Points ∼57% -32%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2338 Points ∼98%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2167 Points ∼91%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2272 - 2336, n=2)
2304 Points ∼97%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2051 - 15735, n=54)
2374 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1907 Points ∼81%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
693 Points ∼29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1121 - 1220, n=2)
1171 Points ∼50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (341 - 14536, n=54)
2359 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
Points ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1988 Points ∼97%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
861 Points ∼42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1365 - 1365, n=4)
657 (min: 1365, max: 1365) Points ∼32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (419 - 14786, n=57)
2051 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2550 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2257 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2215 Points ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼89% -11%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2534 Points ∼99% -1%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1664 Points ∼65% -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1851 - 2789, n=10)
2337 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=384)
1832 Points ∼72% -28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
843 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼48% +155%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4468 Points ∼100% +430%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4471 Points ∼100% +430%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼27% +41%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1845 Points ∼41% +119%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
792 Points ∼18% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (470 - 1194, n=10)
823 Points ∼18% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=384)
1603 Points ∼36% +90%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
981 Points ∼27%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼60% +126%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3669 Points ∼100% +274%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3646 Points ∼99% +272%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼36% +35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1964 Points ∼54% +100%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
896 Points ∼24% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (563 - 1351, n=10)
957 Points ∼26% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=387)
1489 Points ∼41% +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2578 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2506 Points ∼88% -3%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2832 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2181 Points ∼77% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼79% -13%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2516 Points ∼89% -2%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1732 Points ∼61% -33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1656 - 2723, n=10)
2351 Points ∼83% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=399)
1809 Points ∼64% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1336 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2146 Points ∼31% +61%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6898 Points ∼100% +416%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5328 Points ∼77% +299%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼23% +16%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2855 Points ∼41% +114%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1299 Points ∼19% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (740 - 1378, n=10)
1217 Points ∼18% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=399)
2187 Points ∼32% +64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1494 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2217 Points ∼42% +48%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5230 Points ∼100% +250%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4034 Points ∼77% +170%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼32% +12%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2772 Points ∼53% +86%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1375 Points ∼26% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (844 - 1534, n=10)
1361 Points ∼26% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=400)
1860 Points ∼36% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2489 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2528 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2137 Points ∼85% -14%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼93% -6%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2514 Points ∼99% +1%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1645 Points ∼65% -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1924 - 2716, n=10)
2444 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=460)
1768 Points ∼70% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
819 Points ∼17%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼42% +142%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4746 Points ∼100% +479%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4010 Points ∼84% +390%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼24% +40%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1702 Points ∼36% +108%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
704 Points ∼15% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (457 - 856, n=10)
732 Points ∼15% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=462)
1331 Points ∼28% +63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
963 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼52% +115%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3972 Points ∼100% +312%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3356 Points ∼84% +248%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼33% +35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1834 Points ∼46% +90%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
809 Points ∼20% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (550 - 990, n=10)
865 Points ∼22% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=470)
1269 Points ∼32% +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2490 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2480 Points ∼91% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2720 Points ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2124 Points ∼78% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼89% -2%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2467 Points ∼91% -1%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1687 Points ∼62% -32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1907 - 2654, n=10)
2437 Points ∼90% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=493)
1677 Points ∼62% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1256 Points ∼15%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1980 Points ∼24% +58%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8261 Points ∼100% +558%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6243 Points ∼76% +397%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼15% +2%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼33% +120%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1235 Points ∼15% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (568 - 1327, n=10)
1021 Points ∼12% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=493)
1804 Points ∼22% +44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1414 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2073 Points ∼36% +47%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5687 Points ∼100% +302%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4363 Points ∼77% +209%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼25% +1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2691 Points ∼47% +90%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1315 Points ∼23% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (673 - 1490, n=10)
1167 Points ∼21% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=501)
1548 Points ∼27% +9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12023 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13686 Points ∼39% +14%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15766 Points ∼45% +31%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34928 Points ∼100% +191%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
27858 Points ∼80% +132%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼41% +19%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14820 Points ∼42% +23%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
12437 Points ∼36% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11158 - 22668, n=8)
15042 Points ∼43% +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=652)
13700 Points ∼39% +14%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21643 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
43514 Points ∼53% +101%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20953 Points ∼26% -3%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82125 Points ∼100% +279%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
77203 Points ∼94% +257%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼20% -23%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
39655 Points ∼48% +83%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
17878 Points ∼22% -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12426 - 22605, n=8)
20033 Points ∼24% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7573 - 162695, n=652)
20162 Points ∼25% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
18377 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
29316 Points ∼46% +60%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19525 Points ∼31% +6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
63159 Points ∼100% +244%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
55397 Points ∼88% +201%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼25% -13%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
28895 Points ∼46% +57%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
16290 Points ∼26% -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12120 - 22168, n=8)
18433 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8513 - 83518, n=653)
16700 Points ∼26% -9%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
33 fps ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
74 fps ∼49% +124%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼24% +9%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps ∼100% +355%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
120 fps ∼80% +264%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼26% +18%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
65 fps ∼43% +97%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
29 fps ∼19% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (33 - 39, n=9)
37.8 fps ∼25% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=681)
35.2 fps ∼23% +7%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
31 fps ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
58 fps ∼97% +87%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼58% +13%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +94%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +94%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼60% +16%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
57 fps ∼95% +84%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
25 fps ∼42% -19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (31 - 36, n=9)
34.9 fps ∼58% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=684)
27.1 fps ∼45% -13%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
17 fps ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
36 fps ∼51% +112%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼23% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
71 fps ∼100% +318%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
67 fps ∼94% +294%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼32% +35%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
32 fps ∼45% +88%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
13 fps ∼18% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (17 - 21, n=9)
20.3 fps ∼29% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=600)
19.4 fps ∼27% +14%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
16 fps ∼28%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
33 fps ∼57% +106%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼26% -6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +263%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
56 fps ∼97% +250%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼36% +31%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
31 fps ∼53% +94%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
11 fps ∼19% -31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (16 - 19, n=9)
18.4 fps ∼32% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=605)
17.9 fps ∼31% +12%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
26 fps ∼55% +117%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼21% -17%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼74% +192%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
47 fps ∼100% +292%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼30% +17%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
23 fps ∼49% +92%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
9.5 fps ∼20% -21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (12 - 14, n=9)
13.7 fps ∼29% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=461)
15.9 fps ∼34% +33%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
11 fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
24 fps ∼44% +118%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼18% -11%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
54 fps ∼100% +391%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
45 fps ∼83% +309%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼24% +18%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
22 fps ∼41% +100%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
7.8 fps ∼14% -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (11 - 13, n=9)
12.6 fps ∼23% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=464)
15.3 fps ∼28% +39%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.2 fps ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
9.1 fps ∼41% +117%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2 fps ∼9% -52%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +424%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +424%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼22% +17%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
8.2 fps ∼37% +95%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
2.7 fps ∼12% -36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.2 - 7, n=9)
4.22 fps ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=164)
8.87 fps ∼40% +111%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5.8 fps ∼41% +123%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.3 fps ∼16% -12%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +438%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +438%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼22% +19%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5 fps ∼36% +92%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1.7 fps ∼12% -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2.6 - 3.5, n=9)
2.76 fps ∼20% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=164)
6.16 fps ∼44% +137%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼18%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼40% +119%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.6 fps ∼16% -12%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼89% +384%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +447%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼23% +28%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼37% +103%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.4 fps ∼13% -31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 6.9, n=9)
5.93 fps ∼17% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=165)
13.4 fps ∼38% +109%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7 fps ∼21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
16 fps ∼47% +129%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps ∼16% -23%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32 fps ∼94% +357%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼100% +386%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼26% +29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
14 fps ∼41% +100%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.9 fps ∼14% -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4.6 - 7, n=9)
6.31 fps ∼19% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=165)
14.7 fps ∼43% +110%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.9 fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
15 fps ∼43% +117%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼18% -9%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +407%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
26 fps ∼74% +277%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼25% +29%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
13 fps ∼37% +88%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
5.3 fps ∼15% -23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.9 - 7.7, n=9)
7.57 fps ∼22% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=390)
10.7 fps ∼31% +55%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.5 fps ∼20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼39% +100%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼18% -8%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +408%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
28 fps ∼85% +331%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼25% +25%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼36% +85%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
4.3 fps ∼13% -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (6.4 - 7.1, n=9)
6.74 fps ∼20% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=394)
9.7 fps ∼29% +49%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
132834 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
179353 Points ∼68% +35%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117557 Points ∼45% -12%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
263165 Points ∼100% +98%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
144194 Points ∼55% +9%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
169262 Points ∼64% +27%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
88287 Points ∼34% -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (124870 - 140188, n=9)
134298 Points ∼51% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=282)
131480 Points ∼50% -1%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1024 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1172 Points ∼90% +14%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1296 Points ∼100% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1292 Points ∼100% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼72% -9%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
1077 Points ∼83% +5%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
815 Points ∼63% -20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (982 - 1212, n=9)
1101 Points ∼85% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=613)
744 Points ∼57% -27%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1478 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3453 Points ∼43% +134%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7945 Points ∼100% +438%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7895 Points ∼99% +434%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼25% +32%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
3086 Points ∼39% +109%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1409 Points ∼18% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (1450 - 1489, n=9)
1466 Points ∼18% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=613)
1960 Points ∼25% +33%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
3036 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2969 Points ∼91% -2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3239 Points ∼99% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3261 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼76% -18%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2947 Points ∼90% -3%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
983 Points ∼30% -68%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2823 - 4360, n=9)
3267 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=613)
1465 Points ∼45% -52%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5146 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5932 Points ∼90% +15%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6506 Points ∼98% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6620 Points ∼100% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼77% -1%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
5681 Points ∼86% +10%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
3159 Points ∼48% -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (4826 - 5568, n=9)
5248 Points ∼79% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=613)
2881 Points ∼44% -44%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Lite
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2201 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2906 Points ∼75% +32%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3838 Points ∼100% +74%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3852 Points ∼100% +75%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼57% 0%
Nokia 8.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 4096
2731 Points ∼71% +24%
Sony Xperia 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 3072
1374 Points ∼36% -38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
  (2140 - 2445, n=9)
2273 Points ∼59% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=617)
1432 Points ∼37% -35%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.214 Points ∼100% +17%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.781 Points ∼85%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30 - 32.1, n=4)
31 Points ∼83% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (12.9 - 108, n=89)
30.7 Points ∼82% -3%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
16.254 Points ∼44% -49%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
37.5 runs/min ∼100% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=80)
34.5 runs/min ∼92% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)
33.07 runs/min ∼88% +4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (31.2 - 33, n=3)
32 runs/min ∼85% +1%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
31.7 runs/min ∼85%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
83 Points ∼100% +26%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
72 Points ∼87% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
72 Points ∼87% +9%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
66 Points ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=144)
63.1 Points ∼76% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (58 - 69, n=8)
62.3 Points ∼75% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼75% -6%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
54 Points ∼65% -18%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
39 Points ∼47% -41%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
15086 Points ∼100% +54%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
14514 Points ∼96% +48%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
13562 Points ∼90% +39%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
12717 Points ∼84% +30%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼68% +6%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
9779 Points ∼65%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 10288, n=9)
9547 Points ∼63% -2%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
8368 Points ∼55% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=674)
6335 Points ∼42% -35%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
4865 Points ∼32% -50%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=694)
10740 ms * ∼100% -160%
Sony Xperia 10 (Chrome Version 73)
10256.9 ms * ∼96% -148%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
4776 ms * ∼44% -15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4853, n=9)
4247 ms * ∼40% -3%
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74)
4137.8 ms * ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼36% +6%
Nokia 8.1 (Chrome 71)
3034.9 ms * ∼28% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE (Chrome 73)
2911.8 ms * ∼27% +30%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
2818 ms * ∼26% +32%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
2713.6 ms * ∼25% +34%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P30 LiteXiaomi Mi 9 SEMotorola Moto G7 PlusXiaomi Pocophone F1Xiaomi Mi 8Samsung Galaxy A50Nokia 8.1Sony Xperia 10Average 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
19%
3%
18%
45%
6%
-13%
-11%
-10%
-35%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-8%
65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
58.27 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
63.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
65.9 (58.8 - 73.5, n=13)
-3%
48.7 (9.5 - 87.1, n=407)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
84.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
83.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
77.6 (72.3 - 85.9, n=13)
1%
66.8 (8.1 - 96.5, n=407)
-13%
Random Write 4KB
87.29
21.86
-75%
73.1
-16%
17.81
-80%
21
-76%
18.2
-79%
7.3
-92%
14.39
-84%
35.4 (8.48 - 127, n=15)
-59%
20.4 (0.14 - 250, n=722)
-77%
Random Read 4KB
71.57
115.83
62%
76.6
7%
101.01
41%
136.3
90%
98.9
38%
69.9
-2%
53.12
-26%
68.5 (20.7 - 108, n=15)
-4%
45.3 (1.59 - 175, n=722)
-37%
Sequential Write 256KB
158.63
190.1
20%
208.7
32%
155.57
-2%
207.8
31%
192.1
21%
203.8
28%
232.87
47%
172 (90 - 201, n=15)
8%
92.9 (2.99 - 503, n=722)
-41%
Sequential Read 256KB
293.23
492.48
68%
283.6
-3%
705.38
141%
693.2
136%
507.3
73%
279.3
-5%
273.8
-7%
286 (144 - 499, n=15)
-2%
261 (12.1 - 1468, n=722)
-11%
Aspahlt 9 Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø29.3 (20-31)
; Standard / low: Ø29.7 (26-31)
PUBG Compare
0102030Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø24.8 (23-26)
; Balanced: Ø24.7 (21-26)
; HD: Ø23.1 (16-26)
Carga Máxima
 41.5 °C41.5 °C38 °C 
 42.3 °C40 °C37.9 °C 
 40.7 °C40.8 °C38.3 °C 
Máximo: 42.3 °C
Médio: 40.1 °C
36.9 °C39.1 °C41.2 °C
35.3 °C38.5 °C42.9 °C
36 °C39.3 °C41.9 °C
Máximo: 42.9 °C
Médio: 39 °C
alimentação elétrica  27.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.137.72527.425.93125.522.74024.529.15036.135.96326.125.38024.32410022.124.412519.122.116020.243.820019.449.225016.554.531515.158.840015.3615001461.163014.564.98001465.9100014.570.1125014.574.2160014.376.4200014.678.425001479.8315014.779.7400014.378500014.878.9630014.677.5800014.477.41000014.676.31250014.766.4160001559.5SPL26.788.9N0.873.3median 14.6median 66.4Delta1.512.432.53931.931.522.324.821.721.929.228.426.724.920.324.420.526.52325.315.64517.849.116.359.115.461.515.963.515.864.213.367.914.165.914.171.41469.713.567.813.46913.972.314.271.713.967.114.672.914.267.714.766.31568.214.955.415.33826.481.50.852.7median 14.7median 66.30.98.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P30 LiteXiaomi Mi 9 SE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P30 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 9 SE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.24 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.91 / 2.41 / 2.43 Watt
Carga midlight 4.57 / 7.57 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
43%
1%
10%
-28%
8%
27%
20%
2%
16%
Idle Minimum *
0.91
0.53
42%
1.1
-21%
0.65
29%
1.5
-65%
0.8
12%
0.8
12%
0.72
21%
0.948 (0.8 - 1.3, n=9)
-4%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=750)
3%
Idle Average *
2.41
1.18
51%
1.7
29%
1.97
18%
2.2
9%
1.5
38%
1.5
38%
2.16
10%
2.11 (1.2 - 2.5, n=9)
12%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=749)
28%
Idle Maximum *
2.43
1.2
51%
2.1
14%
2.01
17%
2.6
-7%
1.7
30%
1.8
26%
2.17
11%
2.44 (2.2 - 3.6, n=9)
-0%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=750)
17%
Load Average *
4.57
3.04
33%
5.1
-12%
4.29
6%
6.1
-33%
5.9
-29%
3.2
30%
3.32
27%
4.66 (4.06 - 6, n=9)
-2%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=744)
11%
Load Maximum *
7.57
4.83
36%
7.9
-4%
9.05
-20%
10.9
-44%
8.3
-10%
5.4
29%
5.34
29%
7.38 (6.13 - 9.1, n=9)
3%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=744)
22%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
20h 48min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 25min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 18min
Huawei P30 Lite
3340 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE
3070 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Nokia 8.1
3500 mAh
Sony Xperia 10
2870 mAh
Battery Runtime
11%
19%
43%
29%
32%
32%
-1%
Reader / Idle
1248
1374
10%
2088
67%
1634
31%
1587
27%
1682
35%
1006
-19%
H.264
685
853
25%
809
18%
936
37%
897
31%
869
27%
857
25%
620
-9%
WiFi v1.3
515
510
-1%
715
39%
808
57%
736
43%
701
36%
738
43%
541
5%
Load
198
218
10%
196
-1%
220
11%
215
9%
275
39%
246
24%
233
18%

Pro

+ Design
+ Qualidade de construção
+ Bons módulos de câmera
+ GPS preciso
+ Painel IPS bem calibrado
+ 128 GB de memória integrada

Contra

- Armazenamento eMMC em vez de UFS
- Modem Wi-Fi lento
- Disponibilidade limitada para bandas LTE
- Bluetooth 4.2
- Relação de contraste e brilho da tela
- Gravação de vídeo de apenas 1080p
- Afogamento
- Desempenho do SoC durante os jogos
In review: Huawei P30 Lite. Review unit courtesy of Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei P30 Lite. Review unit courtesy of Huawei Germany.

Assim como o seu predecessor o P30 Lite Acabou sendo um smartphone de gama média sólido e decente, incapaz de se diferenciar de seus concorrentes em relação a desempenho ou conectividade. O sufixo “Lite” é claramente perceptível, ao contrário de outros dispositivos, como o Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. Se você está procurando dispositivo diário poderoso e capaz, sugerimos dar uma olhada mais de perto no vasto campo de contendores do Snapdragon.

Embora existam muitos melhores smartphones de gama média disponíveis, esperamos que o P30 Lite se torne um dos smartphones de maior sucesso na sua faixa de preços.

O P30 Lite oferece um design moderno, uma excelente qualidade de construção e um painel IPS com ângulos de visão amplos e cores precisas. As câmeras, particularmente a câmera frontal de 24 MP, são mais do que adequadas para sua classe. No entanto, existem muitas deficiências pequenas que estragam a impressão geral, particularmente ao levar em conta o preço de rua da Huawei. Felizmente, o fabricante chinês provou ser adaptativo o suficiente para perceber que o ajuste de brilho baseado no contexto pode ser demais e, portanto, reduziu o efeito ao mínimo.

Huawei P30 Lite - 05/20/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
90%
Conectividade
45 / 60 → 76%
Peso
92%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
46 / 63 → 73%
Desempenho da aplicação
64 / 70 → 92%
Temperatura
86%
Ruído
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 73%
Camera
70%
Médio
76%
86%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P30 Lite
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-05-24 (Update: 2019-05-25)