Breve Análise do Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T: O workstation móvel é prejudicado por pequenas coisas

Name: Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Brand: Asus

Precisa de alguns ajustes. A nova linha de produtos ProArt da Asus foi projetada especificamente para criadores de conteúdo e inclui portáteis, desktops e telas especiais. Analisamos o StudioBook Pro 17 de 17 polegadas com CPU Core i7 e GPU Nvidia Quadro RTX 3000 Studio Max-Q. A estação de trabalho esbelta é convincente em muitos aspectos, mas o diabo está nos detalhes.

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 05/12/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Coffee Lake Laptop / Notebook Geforce Thunderbolt Windows

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T (ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1250 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 442.74, Optimus

Memória

32 GB

, DDR4-2666, 2 Slots, até 64 GB

Pantalha

17.00 polegadas 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 133 PPI, 170PUW1-A00, IPS, Hannstar, Brilhante: não, 60 Hz

placa mãe

Intel Cannon Lake HM370

Disco rígido

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB

, 901 GB livre

Placa de Som

Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Conexões

4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector estéreo de 3,5 mmk, Card Reader: SD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.4 x 382 x 286

Bateria

57 Wh Lítio-Ion, 3 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 230W PSU, USB-Ethernet-Adapter, Asus Tools, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.48 kg, Suprimento de energia: 800 g

Preço

3900 Euro

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.4 %	05/2020	Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	2.5 kg	18.4 mm	17.00"	1920x1200
83.8 %		MSI WS75 9TL-636 i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)	2.3 kg	18.95 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
89.7 %	12/2019	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M	2 kg	16.2 mm	16.00"	3072x1920
84.7 %		Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.8 kg	24 mm	17.30"	3840x2160
87 %	04/2020	Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	2.7 kg	21 mm	17.30"	3840x2160

Size Comparison

Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB MSI WS75 9TL-636 Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M DIN A4 ❌

Left side: Security slot, power, USB-C w/ TB3 (USB 3.1 Gen.2, DP 1.4, 40 Gbps), HDMI 2.0b, USB-A (3.1 Gen.2), 3.5 mm stereo, SD reader

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	207 MB/s +13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	184 MB/s
MSI WS75 9TL-636 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	180 MB/s -2%
Average of class Workstation (54.8 - 200, n=16, last 2 years)	95.8 MB/s -48%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	245 MB/s 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	244.1 MB/s
MSI WS75 9TL-636 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	209.2 MB/s -14%
Average of class Workstation (78.6 - 226, n=16, last 2 years)	125.6 MB/s -49%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1427 (1103^min - 1464^max) MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1410 MBit/s -1%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	621 (418^min - 641^max) MBit/s -56%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Broadcom 802.11ac	581 (533^min - 616^max) MBit/s -59%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	575 MBit/s -60%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1525 (878^min - 1777^max) MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1390 MBit/s -9%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	923 (874^min - 938^max) MBit/s -39%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Broadcom 802.11ac	817 (806^min - 821^max) MBit/s -46%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	653 MBit/s -57%

ColorChecker Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T: 11.58 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 21.97 ∆E


311 cd/m²	318 cd/m²	310 cd/m²
309 cd/m²	323 cd/m²	325 cd/m²
285 cd/m²	299 cd/m²	292 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

170PUW1-A00 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 325 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 308 cd/m² Minimum: 17.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 320 cd/m²
Contraste: 897:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 0.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
75.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
84.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T 170PUW1-A00, IPS, 1920x1200, 17.00	MSI WS75 9TL-636 B173HAN04.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M APPA044, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00	Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA AUO B173ZAN03, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30	Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB AUO B173ZAN03.2 (AUO329B), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Display		-21%		2%	3%
Display P3 Coverage	96.2	64.5 -33%		86.2 -10%	86.5 -10%
sRGB Coverage	99.8	91.1 -9%		100 0%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	84.7	65.8 -22%		99.1 17%	100 18%
Response Times		5%	-23%	-31%	-11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	41.2 ?(22, 19.2)	39.2 ?(19.6, 19.6) 5%	52.4 ?(23.9, 28.5) -27%	55 ?(29, 26) -33%	55.2 ?(26.8, 28.4) -34%
Response Time Black / White *	29.6 ?(16.4, 13.2)	28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8) 4%	34.9 ?(17.8, 17.1) -18%	38 ?(22, 16) -28%	26 ?(9.2, 16.8) 12%
PWM Frequency			131700
Screen		-86%	-7%	-40%	13%
Brightness middle	323	300 -7%	519 61%	410 27%	487 51%
Brightness	308	288 -6%	477 55%	383 24%	475 54%
Brightness Distribution	88	86 -2%	86 -2%	88 0%	95 8%
Black Level *	0.36	0.25 31%	0.39 -8%	0.58 -61%	0.38 -6%
Contrast	897	1200 34%	1331 48%	707 -21%	1282 43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.1	3.9 -255%	2.28 -107%	1.91 -74%	1.19 -8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.3	6 -82%	6.54 -98%	4.67 -42%	2.43 26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.8	2.3 -188%	0.86 -8%	1.09 -36%	0.5 37%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	0.8	4.3 -438%	0.9 -13%	3 -275%	1.45 -81%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.2 ^100%	2145 ^0%	2.18 ^101%	2.21 ^100%
CCT	6479 ^100%	7391 ^88%	6572 ^99%	6338 ^103%	6557 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	75.7	59.2 -22%	78 3%	87 15%	88 16%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	99.8	91 -9%		100 0%	100 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-34% / -62%	-15% / -10%	-23% / -31%	2% / 8%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.4 ms rise
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H; Auto: Ø1108 (1067.38-1264.38)

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H; Turbo: Ø1162 (1128.51-1249.06)

MSI WS75 9TL-636 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1115 (1053.3-1188)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H; macOS 10.15.1: Ø1407 (1386-1435)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H; Win 10: Ø1296 (1268.87-1362.31)

Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1052 (1021.84-1091.58)

Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1572 (1548.11-1671.4)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Workstation (166.2 - 301, n=27, last 2 years)	255 Points +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Core i7-9850H	192 Points 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H	192 Points
MSI WS75 9TL-636 Intel Core i7-9750H	190 Points -1%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA Intel Core i7-9750H	184.5 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H (macOS 10.15.1)	184 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	184 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (170 - 194, n=82)	183.7 Points -4%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Workstation (706 - 3625, n=27, last 2 years)	2369 Points +87%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H (macOS 10.15.1)	1435 (1401^min - 1435^max) Points +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H (Win 10)	1362 (1268.87^min - 1362.31^max) Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Core i7-9850H	1272 (1143^min - 1229^max) Points +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H (Auto)	1264 Points
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H (Turbo)	1249 Points -1%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 Intel Core i7-9750H	1194 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (952 - 1306, n=85)	1182 Points -6%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA Intel Core i7-9750H	1092 (1021.84^min - 1091.58^max) Points -14%

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6821

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

36274

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6971

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

116.6 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.19 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

13.96 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1264 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

202 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

192 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Workstation (5488 - 8587, n=26, last 2 years)	6880 Points +40%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	6483 Points +32%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5875 Points +19%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	5500 Points +12%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4918 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q ()	4918 Points 0%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00	4395 Points -11%
Essentials
Average of class Workstation (9151 - 12197, n=26, last 2 years)	10541 Points +14%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	10024 Points +9%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	9649 Points +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	9214 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q ()	9214 Points 0%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00	8361 Points -9%
Productivity
Average of class Workstation (7846 - 10820, n=26, last 2 years)	9145 Points +18%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	8176 Points +5%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7979 Points +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7769 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q ()	7769 Points 0%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00	6098 Points -22%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Workstation (5399 - 13947, n=26, last 2 years)	9286 Points +106%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	9022 Points +100%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7198 Points +60%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00	4521 Points 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4511 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q ()	4511 Points 0%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	4900 Points +13%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4732 Points +9%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4322 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q ()	4322 Points 0%
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI WS75 9TL-636 Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5323 Points +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5241 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q ()	5241 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	4812 Points -8%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4322 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		6968 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5241 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		4918 pontos
Ajuda

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3430 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2167 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 515 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 459.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2543 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2222 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.57 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 147.6 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	28555 Points +67%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	23739 Points +39%
Average of class Workstation (7432 - 54334, n=27, last 2 years)	23492 Points +38%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	21105 Points +24%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	20863 Points +22%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	20542 Points +20%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (17074 - 19513, n=3)	18037 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	17569 Points +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	17074 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	14725 Points -14%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	119052 Points +52%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	106470 Points +36%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	91394 Points +17%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	78150 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	76716 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (54418 - 78150, n=2)	66284 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	65776 Points -16%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	65295 Points -16%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	64056 Points -18%
Average of class Workstation (32743 - 133204, n=14, last 2 years)	63450 Points -19%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	20914 Points +58%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	17619 Points +34%
Average of class Workstation (4816 - 35868, n=27, last 2 years)	16582 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	16353 Points +24%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	15881 Points +20%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	15651 Points +19%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	15650 Points +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	13802 Points +5%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (13196 - 14328, n=3)	13714 Points +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	13196 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	10399 Points -21%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	7468 Points +51%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	6851 Points +39%
Average of class Workstation (1882 - 16218, n=27, last 2 years)	6506 Points +32%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	6014 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	5923 Points +20%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	5850 Points +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	5503 Points +11%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (4943 - 5405, n=3)	5132 Points +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	4943 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	3364 Points -32%

SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
Average of class Workstation (88.8 - 225, n=10, last 2 years)	162.2 fps +49%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	149.1 fps +37%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	120.2 fps +11%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (108.6 - 111.9, n=2)	110.3 fps +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	108.6 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	107.1 fps -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	93 fps -14%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	186 fps +106%
Average of class Workstation (27.2 - 309, n=10, last 2 years)	170 fps +88%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	124.3 fps +37%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	99.6 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (90.5 - 103, n=2)	96.8 fps +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	90.5 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	86.8 fps -4%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
Average of class Workstation (30.5 - 172.5, n=10, last 2 years)	115.5 fps +70%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	98 fps +45%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	82.1 fps +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	76.9 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (67.8 - 73.3, n=2)	70.6 fps +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	67.8 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	62.2 fps -8%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
Average of class Workstation (29.5 - 136.7, n=9, last 2 years)	84.5 fps +106%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	62.4 fps +52%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	49 fps +19%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (41 - 46.6, n=2)	43.8 fps +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	43.01 fps +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	41.02 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	22.54 fps -45%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
Average of class Workstation (62.9 - 232, n=10, last 2 years)	144.2 fps +146%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	144.1 fps +146%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	92.9 fps +59%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	73.9 fps +26%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	72.4 fps +24%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (58.5 - 64.7, n=2)	61.6 fps +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	58.5 fps
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
Average of class Workstation (8.45 - 31.5, n=8, last 2 years)	20.4 fps +104%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	13.9 fps +39%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	12.13 fps +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	11.54 fps +16%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (9.99 - 11.3, n=2)	10.6 fps +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	9.99 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	5.46 fps -45%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
Average of class Workstation (86.9 - 204, n=9, last 2 years)	153.8 fps +55%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	140.7 fps +42%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	120.1 fps +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	113.6 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (99.1 - 120.4, n=2)	109.8 fps +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	99.1 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	66.8 fps -33%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
Average of class Workstation (73.8 - 268, n=10, last 2 years)	183.1 fps +88%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	161.9 fps +66%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	130 fps +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	108.8 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (97.4 - 112.1, n=2)	104.8 fps +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	97.4 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	85.5 fps -12%

SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Average of class Workstation (91.8 - 227, n=26, last 2 years)	152.1 fps +37%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	125.4 fps +13%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	122.1 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (110.8 - 126.7, n=3)	120.4 fps +9%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	110.8 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	109.6 fps -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	92.3 fps -17%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	91.3 fps -18%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	271.1 fps +51%
Average of class Workstation (48.9 - 551, n=26, last 2 years)	242 fps +35%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	225.4 fps +26%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (179.4 - 202, n=3)	192.4 fps +7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	179.4 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	160.6 fps -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	157 fps -12%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	20.06 fps -89%
Showcase (showcase-02)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	94.1 fps +39%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	94 fps +39%
Average of class Workstation (24.8 - 190.3, n=26, last 2 years)	82.2 fps +21%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	80.9 fps +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	73.3 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (67.8 - 72.8, n=3)	70.7 fps +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	67.8 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	62.4 fps -8%
Medical (medical-02)
Average of class Workstation (34.5 - 176.2, n=26, last 2 years)	91.1 fps +36%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	73.2 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (67.1 - 73.9, n=3)	70.2 fps +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	67.1 fps
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	65.6 fps -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	53.9 fps -20%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	52.6 fps -22%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	40.07 fps -40%
Maya (maya-05)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	221.5 fps +51%
Average of class Workstation (77.5 - 449, n=26, last 2 years)	220 fps +50%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	207.9 fps +42%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	194.7 fps +33%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (146.4 - 168.8, n=3)	158.7 fps +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	155.4 fps +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	146.4 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	126 fps -14%
Energy (energy-02)
Average of class Workstation (7.71 - 109.7, n=26, last 2 years)	41.3 fps +59%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	36.03 fps +39%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	30.55 fps +18%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (25.9 - 28.6, n=3)	27.2 fps +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	25.94 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	25.76 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	18.47 fps -29%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	17.04 fps -34%
Creo (creo-02)
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	208 fps +37%
Average of class Workstation (76.8 - 398, n=25, last 2 years)	205 fps +35%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	196.2 fps +29%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	172 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (151.8 - 180.9, n=3)	167 fps +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	160.6 fps +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	151.8 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	93.1 fps -39%
Catia (catia-05)
Average of class Workstation (99.5 - 409, n=26, last 2 years)	231 fps +38%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	212.6 fps +27%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	205.2 fps +23%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (166.9 - 198.6, n=3)	186.8 fps +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	185.8 fps +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	166.9 fps
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	128.9 fps -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	125 fps -25%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	181.2 fps +51%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	173 fps +44%
MSI WE75 9TK NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	162.5 fps +35%
Average of class Workstation (61.6 - 284, n=25, last 2 years)	155.6 fps +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	149.4 fps +24%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (120.3 - 136.2, n=3)	130.4 fps +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	120.3 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	89 fps -26%

Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	104.3 fps +36%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	76.9 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q ()	76.9 fps 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	38.4 fps -50%
Average of class Workstation (last 2 years)	35.1 fps -54%
Extreme Preset DX11
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H	122.4 fps +56%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	111.7 fps +42%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	92.1 fps +17%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	78.7 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q ()	78.7 fps 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	44.6 fps -43%
Average of class Workstation (25.2 - 38.3, n=2, last 2 years)	31.8 fps -60%

Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	89.9 fps +32%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	68 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q ()	68 fps 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	58.3 fps -14%
Average of class Workstation (last 2 years)	34.1 fps -50%
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
MSI WS75 9TL-636 NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H	75.8 fps +35%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	56 fps
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q ()	56 fps 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	55.8 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	45.6 (22^min - 82^max) fps -19%
Average of class Workstation (last 2 years)	26.8 fps -52%

3DMark 11 Performance		14763 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		79168 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		32299 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		12130 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		6117 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		5070 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
MSI WS75 9TL-636 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)	303 fps +28%
Average of class Workstation (111.1 - 511, n=27, last 2 years)	284 fps +20%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (236 - 305, n=3)	270 fps +14%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	236 fps
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	240 (194^min) fps +45%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)	215 fps +30%
Average of class Workstation (73 - 430, n=26, last 2 years)	197.8 fps +19%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (166 - 189.4, n=3)	178.8 fps +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	166 fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	142 (120^min) fps +48%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)	132 fps +38%
Average of class Workstation (34.9 - 298, n=27, last 2 years)	113.3 fps +18%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (95.9 - 107.4, n=3)	100.1 fps +4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	95.9 fps
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	74.4 fps -22%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M	68 (61^min - 76^max) fps -29%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	75.3 (63^min) fps +55%
MSI WS75 9TL-636 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)	70 fps +44%
Average of class Workstation (19.6 - 156.5, n=28, last 2 years)	62.8 fps +29%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	57.3 fps +18%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q (48.5 - 57.2, n=3)	52.6 fps +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	48.5 (44^min, 45^P1 - 51^max) fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M	38.8 (34^min - 43^max) fps -20%

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø48.5 (44-51)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	155	150	111.8	58.5	49.4	65
The Witcher 3 (2015)	236	166	95.9	48.5		33.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	131	120	115	109		75.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	195	139	96.7	80.8		34
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	106	92	78.6			64.4
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	86	76	71	65	43	21
Hitman 2 (2018)	66.3	63.2	57.5	55.9	44.8	24.3
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019)	203	128	101	64	47.2
The Division 2 (2019)	114	86	68	50	34	17
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019)	75	65	59	45	32	16
GRID 2019 (2019)	93	72.4	66.3	51.4	46.6	21.2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019)	142.5	93.8	81	54.3	34	17.5
Need for Speed Heat (2019)	82	74.7	66.7	61.9	47.5	25.9
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019)		76.8	71.8	66.3	46.8	24.1
Doom Eternal (2020)	178.3	119.2	104.4	102.6	67.5	31.6

Barulho

Ocioso		29.4 / 29.9 / 29.9 dB
Carga		31.6 / 31.6 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.4 dB(A)

	Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	MSI WS75 9TL-636 Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00	Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Noise		-14%	-18%	-12%	-35%
off / environment *	29.4	29.4 -0%	29.8 -1%	29.8 -1%	30 -2%
Idle Minimum *	29.4	29.4 -0%	29.9 -2%	29.7 -1%	35 -19%
Idle Average *	29.9	30.1 -1%	29.9 -0%	29.7 1%	36 -20%
Idle Maximum *	29.9	30.9 -3%	29.9 -0%	29.7 1%	38 -27%
Load Average *	31.6	40.7 -29%	43 -36%	39.9 -26%	47 -49%
Witcher 3 ultra *	31.6	41.9 -33%	45.4 -44%	39.5 -25%	49 -55%
Load Maximum *	31.6	42.7 -35%	46.1 -46%	41 -30%	54 -71%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


42.5 °C	45.4 °C	42 °C
31.6 °C	40.7 °C	38.1 °C
29.4 °C	31.3 °C	29.5 °C

Máximo: 45.4 °C
Médio: 36.7 °C


50.9 °C	53.7 °C	45.1 °C
36.2 °C	43.5 °C	41.7 °C
30.7 °C	31.7 °C	30.3 °C

Máximo: 53.7 °C
Médio: 40.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 36.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


22.2 °C	22 °C	21.2 °C
21.1 °C	21.4 °C	21.2 °C
21 °C	20.7 °C	20.7 °C

Máximo: 22.2 °C
Médio: 21.3 °C


21.3 °C	21.8 °C	21.6 °C
21.2 °C	21.6 °C	21.3 °C
20.7 °C	20.8 °C	20.9 °C

Máximo: 21.8 °C
Médio: 21.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 23.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 19.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


39.4 °C	43.8 °C	41.6 °C
35.9 °C	39.5 °C	37.6 °C
29.3 °C	31.5 °C	29.6 °C

Máximo: 43.8 °C
Médio: 36.5 °C


49.4 °C	50.6 °C	42.8 °C
38 °C	41.5 °C	38.9 °C
30.2 °C	31.3 °C	29.4 °C

Máximo: 50.6 °C
Médio: 39.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 34.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 19.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.7 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.3 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.5 °C / 88.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-3.7 °C / -6.7 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI WS75 9TL-636 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.44 / 0.92 Watt
Ocioso	11.3 / 16 / 16.8 Watt
Carga	93.6 / 186.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1200, 17.00	MSI WS75 9TL-636 i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, Apple SSD AP1024 7171, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00	Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30	Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30	Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	Average of class Workstation
Power Consumption		-24%	23%	7%	-41%	6%	11%
Idle Minimum *	11.3	16.4 -45%	3.7 67%	6.2 45%	16 -42%	7.7 ?(5.5 - 11.3, n=3) 32%	7.82 ?(2.6 - 19.5, n=25, last 2 years) 31%
Idle Average *	16	21.6 -35%	12.1 24%	15.2 5%	19 -19%	14.6 ?(13.7 - 16, n=3) 9%	12.7 ?(4 - 35.9, n=25, last 2 years) 21%
Idle Maximum *	16.8	22.9 -36%	17 -1%	17.4 -4%	30 -79%	16.9 ?(16.6 - 17.3, n=3) -1%	18.7 ?(5.6 - 47, n=25, last 2 years) -11%
Load Average *	93.6	88 6%	91.5 2%	95 -1%	109 -16%	111.1 ?(93.6 - 121.2, n=3) -19%	96.5 ?(47.7 - 182, n=25, last 2 years) -3%
Witcher 3 ultra *	106	137 -29%	103 3%	136 -28%	167 -58%
Load Maximum *	186.6	193 -3%	102.3 45%	145 22%	246 -32%	173.5 ?(130.7 - 203, n=3) 7%	158.9 ?(60.2 - 311, n=25, last 2 years) 15%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44.18362.449.0)		5h 52min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 44.18362.449.0)		4h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		6h 52min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 39min

	Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, 57 Wh	MSI WS75 9TL-636 i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), 82 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, 99.8 Wh	Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 55 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh	Average of class Workstation
Battery Runtime		2%	35%	-5%	24%	36%
H.264	412	493 20%	580 41%			717 ?(347 - 1104, n=9, last 2 years) 74%
WiFi v1.3	352	395 12%	718 104%	333 -5%	372 6%	536 ?(252 - 897, n=25, last 2 years) 52%
Load	99	72 -27%	58 -41%		140 41%	81.3 ?(55 - 118, n=15, last 2 years) -18%
Reader / Idle		754			592	700 ?(319 - 1072, n=5, last 2 years)
Witcher 3 ultra			54

Pro

+ Chassi fino e sólido

+ Painel mate 16:10

+ Gama P3 e cores precisas

+ Desempenho alto e estável

+ Bons dispositivos de entrada

+ Ventiladores silenciosos com o perfil padrão "Auto"

Contra

- Configurações de ventilador complicadas via MyAsus tool

- Controle irritante dos ventiladores com perfil "turbo"

- Má localização do conector de força

- Webcam pobre

- Sem opção para um painel 4K

Veredicto – O StudioBook Pro é retido por pequenas coisas

In review: Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17. Test model courtesy of Asus Germany.

A Asus tenta vender o StudioBook Pro 17 a clientes profissionais e ao chamado grupo de criadores de conteúdo. O dispositivo de 17 polegadas convence com um chassi fino, porém resistente, mas alguns detalhes precisam de melhorias. Isso inclui o layout das portas e, especialmente, o conector de alimentação no centro do lado esquerdo foi um incômodo repetido durante o período em análise. Os dispositivos de entrada são decentes, mas também há um compromisso. Em vez de um teclado numérico dedicado (haveria espaço suficiente), você obtém um touchpad bastante pequeno com uma função de teclado numérico.

A tela também deixa uma impressão confusa. Gostamos do fato de ser um painel mate 16:10, que foi muito bem calibrado para a gama P3 pelo fabricante. No entanto, as medições básicas (luminância, valor de preto, contraste) são bastante decepcionantes, considerando o preço alto e não há outras opções de tela.

Uma boa primeira tentativa, mas muitas pequenas coisas afetam a impressão geral, especialmente com o alto preço. Gostaríamos de ver mais ajustes para o sucessor em relação aos perfis de desempenho e ao controle do ventilador.

O desempenho, ou mais precisamente, a utilização do desempenho dos componentes é bom quando conectado à rede elétrica, mas os perfis de ventilador no aplicativo MyAsus não são muito bem otimizados. A configuração padrão "Automático" manterá os ventiladores muito silenciosos (também sob carga), mas o desempenho é menor, especialmente quando você estressa os dois componentes simultaneamente. O perfil "Turbo", por outro lado, é extremamente sensível às mudanças de carga, o que é rapidamente irritante na prática. Também gostaríamos de ver uma implementação das configurações com o controle deslizante de desempenho do Windows.

Em suma, o StudioBook Pro 17 ainda é uma boa estação de trabalho móvel, mas o preço de quase 3900 Euros (~US$ 4227) é bastante alto. Outros fabricantes também oferecem GPUs mais poderosas em seus workstations finos.

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T - 2020-05-06 05/06/2020 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento

85 / 98 → 86%

Teclado

91%

Mouse

89%

Conectividade

64 / 80 → 79%

Peso

60 / 10-66 → 89%

Bateria

69 / 95 → 72%

Pantalha

88%

Desempenho do jogos

89%

Desempenho da aplicação

91%

Temperatura

87 / 95 → 91%

Ruído

91 / 90 → 100%

Audio

77%

Camera

25 / 85 → 29%

Médio

78%

86%

Workstation - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1612 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T: O workstation móvel é prejudicado por pequenas coisas

Andreas Osthoff, 2020-05-12 (Update: 2020-05-17)

Breve Análise do Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T: O workstation móvel é prejudicado por pequenas coisas

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T audio analysis

MSI WS75 9TL-636 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto – O StudioBook Pro é retido por pequenas coisas

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare