Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T: O workstation móvel é prejudicado por pequenas coisas

Precisa de alguns ajustes. A nova linha de produtos ProArt da Asus foi projetada especificamente para criadores de conteúdo e inclui portáteis, desktops e telas especiais. Analisamos o StudioBook Pro 17 de 17 polegadas com CPU Core i7 e GPU Nvidia Quadro RTX 3000 Studio Max-Q. A estação de trabalho esbelta é convincente em muitos aspectos, mas o diabo está nos detalhes.

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T (ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q - 6144 MB, Análises do: 1250 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 442.74, Optimus
Memória
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2666, 2 Slots, até 64 GB
Pantalha
17 polegadas 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 133 PPI, 170PUW1-A00, IPS, Hannstar, Brilhante: não, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB 
, 901 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Conexões
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector estéreo de 3,5 mmk, Card Reader: SD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.4 x 382 x 286
Bateria
57 Wh Lítio-Ion, 3 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 230W PSU, USB-Ethernet-Adapter, Asus Tools, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.48 kg, Suprimento de energia: 800 g
Preço
3900 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86 %
05/2020
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
2.5 kg18.4 mm17"1920x1200
84 %
MSI WS75 9TL-636
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
2.3 kg18.95 mm17.3"1920x1080
90 %
12/2019
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M
2 kg16.2 mm16"3072x1920
85 %
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.8 kg24 mm17.3"3840x2160
87 %
04/2020
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2.7 kg21 mm17.3"3840x2160

Size Comparison

403 mm 280 mm 24 mm 2.8 kg396 mm 270 mm 21 mm 2.7 kg396.1 mm 259.5 mm 18.95 mm 2.3 kg382 mm 286 mm 18.4 mm 2.5 kg358 mm 246 mm 16.2 mm 2 kg
Left side: Security slot, power, USB-C w/ TB3 (USB 3.1 Gen.2, DP 1.4, 40 Gbps), HDMI 2.0b, USB-A (3.1 Gen.2), 3.5 mm stereo, SD reader
Left side: Security slot, power, USB-C w/ TB3 (USB 3.1 Gen.2, DP 1.4, 40 Gbps), HDMI 2.0b, USB-A (3.1 Gen.2), 3.5 mm stereo, SD reader
Right side: 2x USB-A (3.1 Gen.2)
Right side: 2x USB-A (3.1 Gen.2)
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207 MB/s ∼100% +13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
184 MB/s ∼89%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
180 MB/s ∼87% -2%
Average of class Workstation
  (17.2 - 213, n=66)
137 MB/s ∼66% -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
245 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
244.1 MB/s ∼100%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
209.2 MB/s ∼85% -14%
Average of class Workstation
  (18.4 - 255, n=65)
172 MB/s ∼70% -30%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1525 (min: 878, max: 1777) MBit/s ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1390 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
923 (min: 874, max: 938) MBit/s ∼61% -39%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Broadcom 802.11ac
817 (min: 806, max: 821) MBit/s ∼54% -46%
Average of class Workstation
  (292 - 1557, n=56)
682 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
653 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1427 (min: 1103, max: 1464) MBit/s ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1410 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
621 (min: 418, max: 641) MBit/s ∼44% -56%
Average of class Workstation
  (83 - 1642, n=56)
620 MBit/s ∼43% -57%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Broadcom 802.11ac
581 (min: 533, max: 616) MBit/s ∼41% -59%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
575 MBit/s ∼40% -60%
ColorChecker
13.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
22 ∆E
14 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T: 11.58 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 21.97 ∆E
311
cd/m²
318
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
309
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
292
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
170PUW1-A00
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 325 cd/m² Médio: 308 cd/m² Minimum: 17.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 320 cd/m²
Contraste: 897:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 0.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 75.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
170PUW1-A00, IPS, 1920x1200, 17
MSI WS75 9TL-636
B173HAN04.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
APPA044, IPS, 3072x1920, 16
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA
AUO B173ZAN03, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
AUO B173ZAN03.2 (AUO329B), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Response Times
5%
-23%
-31%
-11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41.2 (22, 19.2)
39.2 (19.6, 19.6)
5%
52.4 (23.9, 28.5)
-27%
55 (29, 26)
-33%
55.2 (26.8, 28.4)
-34%
Response Time Black / White *
29.6 (16.4, 13.2)
28.4 (15.6, 12.8)
4%
34.9 (17.8, 17.1)
-18%
38 (22, 16)
-28%
26 (9.2, 16.8)
12%
PWM Frequency
131700
Screen
-86%
-7%
-40%
13%
Brightness middle
323
300
-7%
519
61%
410
27%
487
51%
Brightness
308
288
-6%
477
55%
383
24%
475
54%
Brightness Distribution
88
86
-2%
86
-2%
88
0%
95
8%
Black Level *
0.36
0.25
31%
0.39
-8%
0.58
-61%
0.38
-6%
Contrast
897
1200
34%
1331
48%
707
-21%
1282
43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.1
3.9
-255%
2.28
-107%
1.91
-74%
1.19
-8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.3
6
-82%
6.54
-98%
4.67
-42%
2.43
26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.8
2.3
-188%
0.86
-8%
1.09
-36%
0.5
37%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
0.8
4.3
-438%
0.9
-13%
3
-275%
1.45
-81%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.2 100%
2145 0%
2.18 101%
2.21 100%
CCT
6479 100%
7391 88%
6572 99%
6338 103%
6557 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
75.7
59.2
-22%
78
3%
87
15%
88
16%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.8
91
-9%
100
0%
100
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-41% / -72%
-15% / -10%
-36% / -39%
1% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 19.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18300 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380139014001410142014301440145014601470148014901500151015201530154015501560157015801590160016101620163016401650166016701680Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H; Auto: Ø1108 (1067.38-1264.38)
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H; Turbo: Ø1162 (1128.51-1249.06)
MSI WS75 9TL-636 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1115 (1053.3-1188)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H; macOS 10.15.1: Ø1407 (1386-1435)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H; Win 10: Ø1296 (1268.87-1362.31)
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1052 (1021.84-1091.58)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1572 (1548.11-1671.4)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
192 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H
192 Points ∼100%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Intel Core i7-9750H
190 Points ∼99% -1%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA
Intel Core i7-9750H
184.48 Points ∼96% -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H (macOS 10.15.1)
184 Points ∼96% -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
184 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=79)
183 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Workstation
  (117 - 214, n=105)
161 Points ∼84% -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H (macOS 10.15.1)
1435 (min: 1401, max: 1435) Points ∼100% +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H (Win 10)
1362 (min: 1268.87, max: 1362.31) Points ∼95% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
1272 (min: 1143, max: 1229) Points ∼89% +1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Auto)
1264 Points ∼88%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H (Turbo)
1249 Points ∼87% -1%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Intel Core i7-9750H
1194 Points ∼83% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (932 - 1306, n=82)
1171 Points ∼82% -7%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1091.58 (min: 1021.84, max: 1091.58) Points ∼76% -14%
Average of class Workstation
  (260 - 1623, n=109)
793 Points ∼55% -37%
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6821
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
36274
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6971
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
116.57 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.19 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
13.96 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1264 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
202 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
192 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
9022 Points ∼100% +100%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7198 Points ∼80% +60%
Average of class Workstation
  (2329 - 10441, n=46)
5280 Points ∼59% +17%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
4521 Points ∼50% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4511 Points ∼50%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
4511 Points ∼50% 0%
Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8176 Points ∼100% +5%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7979 Points ∼98% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7769 Points ∼95%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
7769 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (3998 - 8761, n=46)
7108 Points ∼87% -9%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
6098 Points ∼75% -22%
Essentials
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
10024 Points ∼100% +9%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9649 Points ∼96% +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9214 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
9214 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (5223 - 9917, n=46)
8618 Points ∼86% -6%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
8361 Points ∼83% -9%
Score
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6483 Points ∼100% +32%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5875 Points ∼91% +19%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
5500 Points ∼85% +12%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4918 Points ∼76%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
4918 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (2817 - 6939, n=47)
4872 Points ∼75% -1%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
4395 Points ∼68% -11%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5323 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5241 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
5241 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (3311 - 5655, n=83)
4834 Points ∼91% -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
4812 Points ∼90% -8%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
4900 Points ∼100% +13%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4732 Points ∼97% +9%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4322 Points ∼88%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
4322 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (2320 - 5505, n=84)
3986 Points ∼81% -8%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4322 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6968 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5241 pontos
Ajuda
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3430 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2166.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 515.07 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 459.23 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2543.41 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2221.97 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.57 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 147.57 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
28555 Points ∼100% +67%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
23739 Points ∼83% +39%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
21105 Points ∼74% +24%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
20863 Points ∼73% +22%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
20542 Points ∼72% +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
17569 Points ∼62% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
17074 Points ∼60%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
17074 Points ∼60% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
14725 Points ∼52% -14%
Average of class Workstation
  (841 - 32999, n=116)
7132 Points ∼25% -58%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
7468 Points ∼100% +51%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
6851 Points ∼92% +39%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
6014 Points ∼81% +22%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
5923 Points ∼79% +20%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
5850 Points ∼78% +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
5503 Points ∼74% +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
4943 Points ∼66%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
4943 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (566 - 9956, n=36)
3547 Points ∼47% -28%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
3364 Points ∼45% -32%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
20914 Points ∼100% +58%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
17619 Points ∼84% +34%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
16353 Points ∼78% +24%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
15881 Points ∼76% +20%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
15651 Points ∼75% +19%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
15650 Points ∼75% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
13802 Points ∼66% +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
13196 Points ∼63%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
13196 Points ∼63% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
10399 Points ∼50% -21%
Average of class Workstation
  (752 - 24354, n=108)
5829 Points ∼28% -56%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
119052 Points ∼100% +52%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
106470 Points ∼89% +36%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
91394 Points ∼77% +17%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
78150 Points ∼66%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
78150 Points ∼66% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
76716 Points ∼64% -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
65776 Points ∼55% -16%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
65295 Points ∼55% -16%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
64056 Points ∼54% -18%
Average of class Workstation
  (5836 - 133756, n=108)
35756 Points ∼30% -54%
SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
149.07 fps ∼100% +37%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
120.22 fps ∼81% +11%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
109 fps ∼73% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
108.58 fps ∼73%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
107.11 fps ∼72% -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
93 fps ∼62% -14%
Average of class Workstation
  (15.6 - 230, n=91)
79.9 fps ∼54% -26%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
186 fps ∼100% +105%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
124.3 fps ∼67% +37%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
99.63 fps ∼54% +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
90.54 fps ∼49%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
90.5 fps ∼49% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
86.8 fps ∼47% -4%
Average of class Workstation
  (4.87 - 258, n=91)
64.9 fps ∼35% -28%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
98.03 fps ∼100% +44%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
82.14 fps ∼84% +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
76.87 fps ∼78% +13%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
67.9 fps ∼69% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
67.85 fps ∼69%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
62.2 fps ∼63% -8%
Average of class Workstation
  (3.93 - 126, n=89)
35.2 fps ∼36% -48%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
62.39 fps ∼100% +52%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
49 fps ∼79% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
43.01 fps ∼69% +5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
41.02 fps ∼66%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
41 fps ∼66% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.99 - 109, n=91)
24.8 fps ∼40% -40%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
22.54 fps ∼36% -45%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
144.13 fps ∼100% +147%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
92.91 fps ∼64% +59%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
73.9 fps ∼51% +26%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
72.36 fps ∼50% +24%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
58.5 fps ∼41% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
58.47 fps ∼41%
Average of class Workstation
  (5.4 - 179, n=92)
48.5 fps ∼34% -17%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
13.9 fps ∼100% +39%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
12.13 fps ∼87% +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
11.54 fps ∼83% +16%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
9.99 fps ∼72%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
9.99 fps ∼72% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
5.46 fps ∼39% -45%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.06 - 26, n=92)
5.16 fps ∼37% -48%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
140.71 fps ∼100% +42%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
120.12 fps ∼85% +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
113.62 fps ∼81% +15%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
99.1 fps ∼70% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
99.08 fps ∼70%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
66.8 fps ∼47% -33%
Average of class Workstation
  (14 - 172, n=92)
59.9 fps ∼43% -40%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
161.91 fps ∼100% +66%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
129.98 fps ∼80% +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
108.79 fps ∼67% +12%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
97.5 fps ∼60% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
97.45 fps ∼60%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
85.5 fps ∼53% -12%
Average of class Workstation
  (13.4 - 220, n=92)
66 fps ∼41% -32%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
125.44 fps ∼100% +13%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
122.09 fps ∼97% +10%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
111 fps ∼88% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
110.83 fps ∼88%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
109.62 fps ∼87% -1%
Average of class Workstation
  (37.3 - 204, n=27)
104 fps ∼83% -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
92.3 fps ∼74% -17%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
91.3 fps ∼73% -18%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
271.14 fps ∼100% +51%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
225.36 fps ∼83% +26%
Average of class Workstation
  (36.4 - 465, n=27)
185 fps ∼68% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
179.45 fps ∼66%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
179 fps ∼66% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
160.56 fps ∼59% -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
157 fps ∼58% -13%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
20.06 fps ∼7% -89%
Showcase (showcase-02)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
94.11 fps ∼100% +39%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
94.04 fps ∼100% +39%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
80.91 fps ∼86% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
73.33 fps ∼78% +8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
67.84 fps ∼72%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
67.8 fps ∼72% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
62.4 fps ∼66% -8%
Average of class Workstation
  (12.6 - 127, n=27)
52.9 fps ∼56% -22%
Medical (medical-02)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
73.2 fps ∼100% +9%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
67.11 fps ∼92%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
67.1 fps ∼92% 0%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
65.56 fps ∼90% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
53.87 fps ∼74% -20%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
52.64 fps ∼72% -22%
Average of class Workstation
  (6.8 - 133, n=27)
40.4 fps ∼55% -40%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
40.07 fps ∼55% -40%
Maya (maya-05)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
221.52 fps ∼100% +51%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
207.89 fps ∼94% +42%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
194.67 fps ∼88% +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
155.35 fps ∼70% +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
146.36 fps ∼66%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
146 fps ∼66% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (29.4 - 341, n=27)
135 fps ∼61% -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
126 fps ∼57% -14%
Energy (energy-02)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
36.03 fps ∼100% +39%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
30.55 fps ∼85% +18%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
25.94 fps ∼72%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
25.9 fps ∼72% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
25.76 fps ∼71% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
18.47 fps ∼51% -29%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
17.04 fps ∼47% -34%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.72 - 57.3, n=27)
16.1 fps ∼45% -38%
Creo (creo-02)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
207.97 fps ∼100% +37%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
196.19 fps ∼94% +29%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
172.03 fps ∼83% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
160.6 fps ∼77% +6%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
152 fps ∼73% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
151.8 fps ∼73%
Average of class Workstation
  (27.8 - 320, n=27)
134 fps ∼64% -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
93.1 fps ∼45% -39%
Catia (catia-05)
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
212.62 fps ∼100% +27%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
205.21 fps ∼97% +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
185.84 fps ∼87% +11%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
167 fps ∼79% 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
166.87 fps ∼78%
Average of class Workstation
  (27.7 - 339, n=27)
150 fps ∼71% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
128.86 fps ∼61% -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
125 fps ∼59% -25%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
181.23 fps ∼100% +51%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
173.01 fps ∼95% +44%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
162.5 fps ∼90% +35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
149.42 fps ∼82% +24%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
120.32 fps ∼66%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
120 fps ∼66% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (20 - 232, n=27)
102 fps ∼56% -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
89 fps ∼49% -26%
Unigine Heaven 4.0
Extreme Preset OpenGL
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
104.3 fps ∼100% +36%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
76.9 fps ∼74%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
76.9 fps ∼74% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (6.8 - 142, n=32)
43.7 fps ∼42% -43%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
38.4 fps ∼37% -50%
Extreme Preset DX11
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
122.4 fps ∼100% +56%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
111.7 fps ∼91% +42%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
92.1 fps ∼75% +17%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
78.7 fps ∼64%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
78.7 fps ∼64% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (8.1 - 172, n=41)
47.6 fps ∼39% -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
44.6 fps ∼36% -43%
Unigine Valley 1.0
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
89.9 fps ∼100% +32%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
68 fps ∼76%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
68 fps ∼76% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
58.3 fps ∼65% -14%
Average of class Workstation
  (6.1 - 126, n=44)
35.7 fps ∼40% -47%
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
75.8 fps ∼100% +35%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
56 fps ∼74%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
56 fps ∼74% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
55.8 fps ∼74% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
45.6 (min: 22, max: 82) fps ∼60% -19%
Average of class Workstation
  (5.6 - 102, n=43)
29.2 fps ∼39% -48%
3DMark 11 Performance
14763 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
79168 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
32299 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
12130 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
6117 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
5070 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
75.3 (min: 63) fps ∼100% +55%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
70 fps ∼93% +44%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
57.3 fps ∼76% +18%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
48.5 (min: 44, max: 51, 99th percentile: 45) fps ∼64%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
48.5 fps ∼64% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
38.8 (min: 34, max: 43) fps ∼52% -20%
Average of class Workstation
  (5.7 - 110, n=65)
29.4 fps ∼39% -39%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
142 (min: 120) fps ∼100% +48%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
132 fps ∼93% +38%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
95.9 fps ∼68%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
95.9 fps ∼68% 0%
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
74.4 fps ∼52% -22%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
68 (min: 61, max: 76) fps ∼48% -29%
Average of class Workstation
  (8 - 199, n=65)
47.2 fps ∼33% -51%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
240 (min: 194) fps ∼100% +45%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
215 fps ∼90% +30%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
166 fps ∼69%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
166 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (16.7 - 309, n=63)
81.8 fps ∼34% -51%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
303 fps ∼100% +28%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
236 fps ∼78%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
236 fps ∼78% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (26.8 - 375, n=56)
125 fps ∼41% -47%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø48.5 (44-51)
baixo média alto ultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 155 150 111.8 58.5 49.4 65 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 236 166 95.9 48.5 33.8 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 131 120 115 109 75.6 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 195 139 96.7 80.8 34 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 106 92 78.6 64.4 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 86 76 71 65 43 21 fps
Hitman 2 (2018) 66.3 63.2 57.5 55.9 44.8 24.3 fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 203 128 101 64 47.2 fps
The Division 2 (2019) 114 86 68 50 34 17 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 75 65 59 45 32 16 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 93 72.4 66.3 51.4 46.6 21.2 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 142.5 93.8 81 54.3 34 17.5 fps
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 82 74.7 66.7 61.9 47.5 25.9 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 76.8 71.8 66.3 46.8 24.1 fps
Doom Eternal (2020) 178.3 119.2 104.4 102.6 67.5 31.6 fps

Barulho

Ocioso
29.4 / 29.9 / 29.9 dB
Carga
31.6 / 31.6 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29.4 dB(A)
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Noise
-14%
-18%
-12%
-35%
off / environment *
29.4
29.4
-0%
29.8
-1%
29.8
-1%
30
-2%
Idle Minimum *
29.4
29.4
-0%
29.9
-2%
29.7
-1%
35
-19%
Idle Average *
29.9
30.1
-1%
29.9
-0%
29.7
1%
36
-20%
Idle Maximum *
29.9
30.9
-3%
29.9
-0%
29.7
1%
38
-27%
Load Average *
31.6
40.7
-29%
43
-36%
39.9
-26%
47
-49%
Witcher 3 ultra *
31.6
41.9
-33%
45.4
-44%
39.5
-25%
49
-55%
Load Maximum *
31.6
42.7
-35%
46.1
-46%
41
-30%
54
-71%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202930.328.429.82526.929.226.628.63127.132.531.233.74025.933.731.627.95029.427.225.629.26324.324.923.826.2802423.624.629.510026.524.724.526.912523.722.923.524.116024.424.822.425.420022.623.522.724.325023.522.222.324.431521.921.621.523.940021.720.620.425.350020.820.82025.463020.619.819.424.580020.819.11927.4100020.618.518.127.8125020.417.917.628.8160019.917.516.828.2200020.21716.628.1250018.916.81626.6315020.217.115.927.9400019.216.41625.1500016.815.915.823.5630016.51615.822.1800016.715.915.9181000016.31615.816.4125001615.815.715.91600015.715.515.415.6SPL31.629.929.438.3N1.61.31.32.9median 20.4median 17.9median 17.6median 25.1Delta1.92.73.12.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
 42.5 °C45.4 °C42 °C 
 31.6 °C40.7 °C38.1 °C 
 29.4 °C31.3 °C29.5 °C 
Máximo: 45.4 °C
Médio: 36.7 °C
50.9 °C53.7 °C45.1 °C
36.2 °C43.5 °C41.7 °C
30.7 °C31.7 °C30.3 °C
Máximo: 53.7 °C
Médio: 40.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  36.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 37.3 °C / 99 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.7 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.3 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.5 °C / 88.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-3.7 °C / -6.7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.428.12526.628.43131.228.94031.630.75025.632.86323.829.38024.629.210024.536.412523.538.916022.446.120022.751.125022.355.731521.559.240020.462.95002067.563019.466.58001965.7100018.165.9125017.665.7160016.865.5200016.670.825001672.3315015.966.840001665.7500015.865.7630015.857.5800015.9571000015.861.81250015.760.31600015.456.1SPL29.479N1.343.5median 17.6median 62.9Delta3.15.732.536.62628.934.430.73029.525.729.62332.326.730.823.628.422.328.321.828.621.831.521.63820.645.119.849.919.751.719.661.518.865.718.66518.16517.260.916.762.116.459.316.262.81662.115.969.415.763.215.659.615.356.615.25114.845.629.475.41.334.1median 18.1median 59.32.19.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3TMSI WS75 9TL-636
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 19%, worst was 31%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

MSI WS75 9TL-636 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 19%, worst was 31%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.44 / 0.92 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 11.3 / 16 / 16.8 Watt
Carga midlight 93.6 / 186.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1200, 17
MSI WS75 9TL-636
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, Apple SSD AP1024 7171, IPS, 3072x1920, 16
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
 
Average of class Workstation
 
Power Consumption
-24%
23%
7%
-41%
0%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
11.3
16.4
-45%
3.7
67%
6.2
45%
16
-42%
11.3
-0%
13.2 (2.4 - 65.2, n=139)
-17%
Idle Average *
16
21.6
-35%
12.1
24%
15.2
5%
19
-19%
16
-0%
19 (4.94 - 69, n=138)
-19%
Idle Maximum *
16.8
22.9
-36%
17
-1%
17.4
-4%
30
-79%
16.8
-0%
22.4 (7.1 - 73.1, n=139)
-33%
Load Average *
93.6
88
6%
91.5
2%
95
-1%
109
-16%
93.6
-0%
88.2 (34.4 - 185, n=137)
6%
Load Maximum *
186.6
193
-3%
102.3
45%
145
22%
246
-32%
187
-0%
134 (43.5 - 336, n=137)
28%
Witcher 3 ultra *
106
137
-29%
103
3%
136
-28%
167
-58%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 44.18362.449.0)
5h 52min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 max Brightness (Edge 44.18362.449.0)
4h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 52min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 39min
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, 57 Wh
MSI WS75 9TL-636
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), 82 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, 99.8 Wh
Acer ConceptD 5 CN517-71-74YA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 55 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh
Average of class Workstation
 
Battery Runtime
2%
35%
-5%
24%
4%
Reader / Idle
754
592
618 (63 - 2360, n=125)
H.264
412
493
20%
580
41%
415 (123 - 1131, n=67)
1%
WiFi v1.3
352
395
12%
718
104%
333
-5%
372
6%
414 (106 - 974, n=78)
18%
Load
99
72
-27%
58
-41%
140
41%
91.1 (22 - 323, n=125)
-8%
Witcher 3 ultra
54

Pro

+ Chassi fino e sólido
+ Painel mate 16:10
+ Gama P3 e cores precisas
+ Desempenho alto e estável
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Ventiladores silenciosos com o perfil padrão "Auto"

Contra

- Configurações de ventilador complicadas via MyAsus tool
- Controle irritante dos ventiladores com perfil "turbo"
- Má localização do conector de força
- Webcam pobre
- Sem opção para um painel 4K

Veredicto – O StudioBook Pro é retido por pequenas coisas

In review: Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17. Test model courtesy of Asus Germany.
In review: Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17. Test model courtesy of Asus Germany.

A Asus tenta vender o StudioBook Pro 17 a clientes profissionais e ao chamado grupo de criadores de conteúdo. O dispositivo de 17 polegadas convence com um chassi fino, porém resistente, mas alguns detalhes precisam de melhorias. Isso inclui o layout das portas e, especialmente, o conector de alimentação no centro do lado esquerdo foi um incômodo repetido durante o período em análise. Os dispositivos de entrada são decentes, mas também há um compromisso. Em vez de um teclado numérico dedicado (haveria espaço suficiente), você obtém um touchpad bastante pequeno com uma função de teclado numérico.

A tela também deixa uma impressão confusa. Gostamos do fato de ser um painel mate 16:10, que foi muito bem calibrado para a gama P3 pelo fabricante. No entanto, as medições básicas (luminância, valor de preto, contraste) são bastante decepcionantes, considerando o preço alto e não há outras opções de tela.

Uma boa primeira tentativa, mas muitas pequenas coisas afetam a impressão geral, especialmente com o alto preço. Gostaríamos de ver mais ajustes para o sucessor em relação aos perfis de desempenho e ao controle do ventilador.

O desempenho, ou mais precisamente, a utilização do desempenho dos componentes é bom quando conectado à rede elétrica, mas os perfis de ventilador no aplicativo MyAsus não são muito bem otimizados. A configuração padrão "Automático" manterá os ventiladores muito silenciosos (também sob carga), mas o desempenho é menor, especialmente quando você estressa os dois componentes simultaneamente. O perfil "Turbo", por outro lado, é extremamente sensível às mudanças de carga, o que é rapidamente irritante na prática. Também gostaríamos de ver uma implementação das configurações com o controle deslizante de desempenho do Windows.

Em suma, o StudioBook Pro 17 ainda é uma boa estação de trabalho móvel, mas o preço de quase 3900 Euros (~US$ 4227) é bastante alto. Outros fabricantes também oferecem GPUs mais poderosas em seus workstations finos.

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T - 05/06/2020 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento
85 / 98 → 86%
Teclado
91%
Mouse
89%
Conectividade
64 / 80 → 79%
Peso
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Bateria
69 / 95 → 72%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
89%
Desempenho da aplicação
91%
Temperatura
87 / 95 → 91%
Ruído
91 / 90 → 100%
Audio
77%
Camera
25 / 85 → 29%
Médio
78%
86%
Workstation - Médio equilibrado
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T: O workstation móvel é prejudicado por pequenas coisas
Andreas Osthoff, 2020-05-12 (Update: 2020-05-17)
Andreas Osthoff
Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Notebooks