Breve Análise do Portátil Asus Zephyrus G14 Ryzen 9 GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q: Levando o Core i9 ao limite

Name: Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
Brand: Asus

Mais rápido que o Intel Core i9-9880H. O Ryzen 9 4900HS de oito núcleos seria impressionante em qualquer portátil para jogos de 15,6 ou 17,3 polegadas, mas é extraordinário vê-lo funcionar tão bem em um formato tão pequeno de 14 polegadas. No entanto, existem um ou dois obstáculos que impedem que ele seja o melhor portátil para jogos.

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 03/31/2020 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 ...

Laptop / Notebook Renoir AMD Gaming Geforce

Test device courtesy of Asus

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV (ROG Zephyrus G14 GA401 Serie)

Processador

AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS 8 x 3 - 4.3 GHz, Renoir (Zen 2)

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 975 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, 442.59, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, 8 GB soldados + 8 GB DDR4-3200 (1x SODIMM), 22-22-22-52

Pantalha

14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, CEC PA LM140LF-1F01, IPS, NCP0050, Brilhante: não, 120 Hz

placa mãe

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Disco rígido

Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, 1024 GB

Placa de Som

AMD Rave/Renoir - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Conexões

4 USB 3.0, 4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 17.9 x 324 x 222

Bateria

76 Wh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2x 2,5 W estéreo + 2x 0,7 W tweeters, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Armoury Crate, 12 Meses Garantia

peso

1.6 kg, Suprimento de energia: 509 g

Preço

1900 USD

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
83.6 %	03/2020	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV R9 4900HS, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q	1.6 kg	17.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
82.9 %	10/2019	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	2 kg	18.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
84.2 %	09/2019	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	2.1 kg	19.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83.8 %	06/2019	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	2 kg	18 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83 %	09/2019	Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	2.2 kg	18.3 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
84.2 %	02/2020	MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	1.3 kg	16 mm	14.00"	3840x2160

Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 Alienware m15 R2 P87F MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 DIN A4 ❌

Right: USB Type-C Gen. 2 3.2, 2x USB 3.2 Gen. 1 Type-A, Kensington Lock

Left: AC adapter, HDMI 2.0b, USB Type-C Gen. 2 3.2 w/ DisplayPort 1.4 and Power Delivery, 3.5 mm combo audio

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1666 (841^min - 1700^max) MBit/s +1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1645 (1401^min - 1773^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1203 (1102^min - 1276^max) MBit/s -27%
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1195 (922^min - 1315^max) MBit/s -27%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1378 (693^min - 1402^max) MBit/s +11%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1242 (1133^min - 1283^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1128 (1037^min - 1164^max) MBit/s -9%
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1096 (1062^min - 1130^max) MBit/s -12%


302.9 cd/m²	310.6 cd/m²	292.2 cd/m²
297 cd/m²	322.2 cd/m²	297.8 cd/m²
281.8 cd/m²	318.2 cd/m²	298.4 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

CEC PA LM140LF-1F01 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 322.2 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 302.3 cd/m² Minimum: 15.57 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 192.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 1239:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 2.29
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
91.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV CEC PA LM140LF-1F01, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 IPS, 14.00, 3840x2160
Display		-1%	-1%	4%	-0%
Display P3 Coverage	66.5	66.5 0%	65.3 -2%	67.6 2%	65.3 -2%
sRGB Coverage	92	90.8 -1%	91.8 0%	97.5 6%	95.1 3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.2	66.5 -1%	66.5 -1%	68.9 3%	65.9 -2%
Response Times		80%	70%	68%	69%	-15%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	43.6 ?(21.2, 22.4)	6.4 ?(3.4, 3) 85%	13.6 ?(7.2, 6.4) 69%	13.6 ?(8, 5.6) 69%	16.4 ?(7.6, 6.8) 62%	55 ?(27, 28) -26%
Response Time Black / White *	34.8 ?(20.4, 14.4)	8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4) 75%	10 ?(6, 4) 71%	12 ?(7.6, 4.4) 66%	8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4) 75%	36 ?(22, 14) -3%
PWM Frequency			200 ?(99)	23260 ?(19)	23810 ?(24)
Screen		-17%	-17%	13%	-39%	24%
Brightness middle	322.2	297.7 -8%	312.7 -3%	282.3 -12%	324.2 1%	567 76%
Brightness	302	280 -7%	305 1%	269 -11%	304 1%	516 71%
Brightness Distribution	87	84 -3%	90 3%	90 3%	90 3%	86 -1%
Black Level *	0.26	0.43 -65%	0.27 -4%	0.32 -23%	0.38 -46%	0.445 -71%
Contrast	1239	692 -44%	1158 -7%	882 -29%	853 -31%	1274 3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.43	3.13 -29%	4.57 -88%	1.17 52%	5.01 -106%	1.55 36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.07	7.1 -40%	6.81 -34%	3.29 35%	12.7 -150%	5.14 -1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.29	3.06 -34%	2.91 -27%	1.06 54%	1.64 28%	1.24 46%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.3	1.9 42%	4.3 -30%	1.3 61%	7.9 -139%	1.48 55%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.23 ^99%	2.29 ^96%	2.2 ^100%	2.35 ^94%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	6902 ^94%	6325 ^103%	7098 ^92%	6643 ^98%	8455 ^77%	6741 ^96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	60	59.2 -1%	59.4 -1%	63.8 6%	60.8 1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	91.9	90.5 -2%	91.3 -1%	97.5 6%	95.5 4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		21% / -2%	17% / -3%	28% / 18%	10% / -19%	5% / 17%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20.4 ms rise
34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21.2 ms rise
43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1655 (1591.98-1850.91)

MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1496 (1486.55-1622.78)

MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1998 (1943.92-2022.14)

MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1353 (1323.32-1378.12)

Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	506 Points +2%
Medion Erazer X15805 Intel Core i9-8950HK	498 Points +1%
Corsair One i160 Intel Core i9-9900K	495 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	495 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	478 Points -3%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Core i9-9880H	467 Points -6%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Intel Core i7-10710U	460 Points -7%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	441 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR Intel Core i7-9750H	422 Points -15%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H	418 Points -16%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG Intel Core i7-8750H	409 Points -17%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	361 Points -27%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	352 Points -29%
CPU (Multi Core)
Corsair One i160 Intel Core i9-9900K	4816 Points +12%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	4782 Points +12%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	4288 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	4136 Points -4%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	3712 Points -13%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Core i9-9880H	2953 Points -31%
Medion Erazer X15805 Intel Core i9-8950HK	2924 Points -32%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Intel Core i7-10710U	2598 Points -39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR Intel Core i7-9750H	2357 Points -45%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG Intel Core i7-8750H	2142 Points -50%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H	1737 Points -59%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	1659 Points -61%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	1633 Points -62%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	204 Points +6%
Medion Erazer X15805 Intel Core i9-8950HK	203 Points +5%
Corsair One i160 Intel Core i9-9900K	203 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Core i9-9880H	197 Points +2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	195 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	193 Points
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Intel Core i7-10710U	191 Points -1%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	189 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR Intel Core i7-9750H	173 Points -10%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H	173 Points -10%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG Intel Core i7-8750H	167 Points -13%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	144 Points -25%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	143 Points -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	2092 Points +12%
Corsair One i160 Intel Core i9-9900K	1987 Points +7%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	1863 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	1754 Points -6%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	1721 Points -8%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Core i9-9880H	1450 Points -22%
Medion Erazer X15805 Intel Core i9-8950HK	1217 Points -35%
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC Intel Core i7-10710U	1103 Points -41%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR Intel Core i7-9750H	1097 Points -41%
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG Intel Core i7-8750H	1016 Points -45%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC Intel Core i5-9300H	797 Points -57%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	742 Points -60%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	734 Points -61%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Corsair One i160 Intel Core i9-9900K	2.33 Points +4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	2.3 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	2.23 Points
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	2.11 Points -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	23.19 Points +27%
Corsair One i160 Intel Core i9-9900K	21.76 Points +19%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	18.94 Points +4%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	18.21 Points

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Corsair One i160 Intel Core i9-9900K	49142 Points +30%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	42456 Points +12%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	40439 Points +7%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	37938 Points
Medion Erazer X15805 Intel Core i9-8950HK	36591 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR Intel Core i7-9750H	28763 Points -24%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	19290 Points -49%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	19002 Points -50%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Corsair One i160 Intel Core i9-9900K	7786 Points +33%
Medion Erazer X15805 Intel Core i9-8950HK	7735 Points +32%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	6967 Points +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR Intel Core i7-9750H	6679 Points +14%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	5866 Points
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	5839 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	4606 Points -21%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 AMD Ryzen 7 3750H	4527 Points -23%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	118.7 s * -35%
Corsair One i160 Intel Core i9-9900K	91.3 s * -4%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS	88.2 s *
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X	86.7 s * +2%

Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

11800

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

37938

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5866

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

76.3 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

18.21 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.23 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

104.1 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1863 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

193 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6306 Points +10%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	5751 Points
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5725 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5273 Points -8%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5150 Points -10%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G	4733 Points -18%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G	4663 Points -19%
Essentials
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	9920 Points
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	9608 Points -3%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	9380 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	8946 Points -10%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G	8913 Points -10%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8785 Points -11%
Productivity
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8416 Points +11%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	7657 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	7606 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	7339 Points -4%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6754 Points -11%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G	6059 Points -20%
Digital Content Creation
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8419 Points +23%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	7090 Points +4%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	6843 Points
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6248 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	6062 Points -11%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G	5330 Points -22%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	4815 Points
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G	4800 Points 0%
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4550 Points -6%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4454 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4094 Points -15%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	3511 Points -27%
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6004 Points +5%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5751 Points 0%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	5738 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5610 Points -2%
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK Radeon RX 5500M, R7 3750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G	5167 Points -10%
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4422 Points -23%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4815 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5738 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		5751 pontos
Ajuda

	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Alienware m15 R2 P87F 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)	MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
AS SSD		-30%	47%	23%	60%
Seq Read	1278	1221 -4%	2005 57%	1925 51%	2300 80%
Seq Write	1624	911 -44%	1580 -3%	2371 46%	2051 26%
4K Read	57.8	48.24 -17%	49.33 -15%	37.2 -36%	46.23 -20%
4K Write	163	99.2 -39%	103.8 -36%	108.9 -33%	84.6 -48%
4K-64 Read	582	321.4 -45%	1241 113%	1177 102%	1552 167%
4K-64 Write	849	744 -12%	1730 104%	1135 34%	1789 111%
Access Time Read *	0.036	0.071 -97%	0.054 -50%	0.065 -81%	0.049 -36%
Access Time Write *	0.112	0.139 -24%	0.036 68%	0.108 4%	0.045 60%
Score Read	768	492 -36%	1490 94%	1407 83%	1828 138%
Score Write	1174	934 -20%	1991 70%	1481 26%	2079 77%
Score Total	2372	1681 -29%	4230 78%	3633 53%	4831 104%
Copy ISO MB/s	1660	906 -45%	3025 82%	2073 25%
Copy Program MB/s	443.5	486.6 10%	713 61%	576 30%
Copy Game MB/s	1162	952 -18%	1554 34%	1426 23%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-19%	-3%	20%	7%
Write 4K	189.5	156 -18%	91.3 -52%	108.8 -43%	163.8 -14%
Read 4K	62.7	60.7 -3%	40.73 -35%	45.41 -28%	48.6 -22%
Write Seq	1735	968 -44%	1915 10%	2467 42%	2269 31%
Read Seq	1608	1619 1%	2051 28%	2456 53%	1963 22%
Write 4K Q32T1	475.5	485 2%	308.3 -35%	532 12%	289.8 -39%
Read 4K Q32T1	555	337.3 -39%	417.4 -25%	590 6%	373.6 -33%
Write Seq Q32T1	1802	969 -46%	1922 7%	2801 55%	2395 33%
Read Seq Q32T1	1929	1825 -5%	3395 76%	3172 64%	3479 80%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-25% / -26%	22% / 29%	22% / 22%	34% / 38%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 0 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 0 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 0 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 0 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 0 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 0 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 0 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 0 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X	32081 Points +105%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK	22391 Points +43%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	19338 Points +24%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	18055 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	17419 Points +11%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS	15650 Points
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	14718 Points -6%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	11332 Points -28%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H	8391 Points -46%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	7791 Points -50%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X	13744 Points +135%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK	8479 Points +45%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	7732 Points +32%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	6910 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	6387 Points +9%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS	5850 Points
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5534 Points -5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	3626 Points -38%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H	3132 Points -46%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	2536 Points -57%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X	8537 Points +158%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK	5092 Points +54%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	3742 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	3738 Points +13%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS	3307 Points
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X	13424 Points +118%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK	8604 Points +39%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	7878 Points +28%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	6911 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	6358 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS	6171 Points
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	5697 Points -8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	3795 Points -39%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H	3373 Points -45%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	2571 Points -58%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X	45050 Points +113%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK	29220 Points +38%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	26413 Points +25%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	23734 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	21861 Points +4%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS	21105 Points
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	19670 Points -7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	12620 Points -40%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H	11991 Points -43%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	9466 Points -55%
1280x720 Performance Combined
KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti EX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop), R9 3900X	18340 Points +36%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK	14894 Points +10%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X	13742 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS	13533 Points
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H	12450 Points -8%
Maingear Vector 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H	12192 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H	12064 Points -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H	10846 Points -20%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H	8540 Points -37%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	6839 Points -49%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		37332 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result		50957 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		18937 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		85539 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		38287 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		14649 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		6171 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Shadow of the Tomb Raider | The Witcher 3 | Rocket League

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	178 fps +51%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	143 fps +21%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	142 fps +20%
MSI GF65 9SD Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	135 fps +14%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	133 fps +13%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	133 fps +13%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	128 fps +8%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q	118 (85^min - 177^max) fps
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	105 fps -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	62 fps -47%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	134 fps +60%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	105 fps +25%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	101 fps +20%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	101 fps +20%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	94 fps +12%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	91 fps +8%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q	84 (79^min - 138^max) fps
MSI GF65 9SD Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	72 fps -14%
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	53 fps -37%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	53 fps -37%
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	51 fps -39%
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	124 fps +68%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	99 fps +34%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	95 fps +28%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	90 fps +22%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	83 fps +12%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	83 fps +12%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q	74 fps
MSI GF65 9SD Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	64 fps -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	49 fps -34%
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	47 fps -36%
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	45 fps -39%

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	414.3 fps +78%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	326.6 fps +41%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	295.3 fps +27%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	295.3 fps +27%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	290.1 fps +25%
MSI GF65 9SD Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	287.9 fps +24%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	286.7 (265^min - 336^max) fps +23%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q	232.2 fps
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	196 fps -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	138.4 fps -40%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS Intel Core i9-9900KS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	95.5 fps +64%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	78.4 fps +34%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	78 fps +34%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	72.7 (61^min - 82^max) fps +24%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	69 fps +18%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	68.9 fps +18%
MSI GF65 9SD Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	60.6 fps +4%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q	58.4 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	48.8 fps -16%
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	36.5 fps -37%
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	36.5 fps -37%

Rocket League
1280x720 Performance
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	247.2 fps 0%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q	246.9 fps
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	246 (225^min - 252^max) fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	206.7 fps -16%
1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)	221 (183^min - 251^max) fps +1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q	219.3 fps
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q	145.6 fps -34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	141.7 fps -35%

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8: Ø99.3 (88-104)

Average of class Gaming : Ø196.1 (188.9-214)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
Guild Wars 2 (2012)	130.3		67.3	67.4
BioShock Infinite (2013)	278.3	252.3	229.5	126.2
The Witcher 3 (2015)	232.2	168.2	100.6	58.4
Metal Gear Solid V (2015)	60	60	60	59.2
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	120.8	115.1	107.8	103.8
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)	100.4	72.8	66.8
Doom (2016)	125	125	118.2	111.5
Overwatch (2016)	299.9	299.7	229.7	146.9
Rocket League (2017)	246.9	249.7	219.3
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)	155	123	97	76
Fortnite (2018)	124	110.2	107.4	81.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	141	82.7	62.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	94.9	81.9	69.7
Monster Hunter World (2018)	104.5	94.2	75.6	63.6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	118	90	84	74
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018)	97	79	65	45
Apex Legends (2019)	143.6	142.8	126.2	116.6
Metro Exodus (2019)	129.6	72.7	55.2	43.8
The Division 2 (2019)	154	92	74	56
Anno 1800 (2019)	81.5	81.6	61.4	36.5
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)	201.1	103.3	69.2	50.7
F1 2019 (2019)	196	137	116	101
Borderlands 3 (2019)	117	89.5	61.9	48.3
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019)	123	82	75	55
Need for Speed Heat (2019)	103.2	88.7	82.2	79
Escape from Tarkov (2020)	78.5	68.5	68.2	85.3
Hunt Showdown (2020)	194.2	96.3	75.7
Doom Eternal (2020)	176.1	108.7	95.7	93.3

	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)	MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Noise		-1%	1%	2%	-10%	1%
off / environment *	28.1	28.2 -0%	28.5 -1%	28.3 -1%	28.3 -1%	30.3 -8%
Idle Minimum *	30.4	28.7 6%	30.3 -0%	30.4 -0%	28.5 6%	30.3 -0%
Idle Average *	31.5	30.5 3%	30.5 3%	30.5 3%	28.5 10%	30.3 4%
Idle Maximum *	33.7	31 8%	30.5 9%	30.6 9%	49 -45%	30.3 10%
Load Average *	34.3	39 -14%	41 -20%	37.6 -10%	49 -43%	40.2 -17%
Witcher 3 ultra *	53.5	54.2 -1%	48 10%	46 14%	49 8%
Load Maximum *	53.5	59.6 -11%	51.9 3%	55.1 -3%	55 -3%	43.5 19%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso		30.4 / 31.5 / 33.7 dB
Carga		34.3 / 53.5 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.1 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


30 °C	36 °C	29 °C
28.8 °C	35.4 °C	28 °C
24 °C	23.6 °C	24.6 °C

Máximo: 36 °C
Médio: 28.8 °C


28.8 °C	39 °C	31.2 °C
30.6 °C	46.4 °C	31.8 °C
25.6 °C	26 °C	26.2 °C

Máximo: 46.4 °C
Médio: 31.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 44 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


24 °C	29 °C	24.2 °C
24.2 °C	28 °C	26.2 °C
22.6 °C	23 °C	23.6 °C

Máximo: 29 °C
Médio: 25 °C


24.2 °C	29.2 °C	25 °C
29 °C	32 °C	25.8 °C
23.8 °C	23.2 °C	23.2 °C

Máximo: 32 °C
Médio: 26.2 °C

Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


35.2 °C	45.2 °C	35.4 °C
33.2 °C	43.4 °C	34 °C
28.2 °C	28 °C	28 °C

Máximo: 45.2 °C
Médio: 34.5 °C


38 °C	47.6 °C	36.4 °C
37.2 °C	54.4 °C	39.4 °C
29 °C	28.8 °C	29 °C

Máximo: 54.4 °C
Médio: 37.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 47 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.2 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.7 °C / 1.2 F).

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.2 / 0.86 Watt
Ocioso	5.5 / 9.3 / 15.8 Watt
Carga	92.2 / 156.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV R9 4900HS, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 3840x2160, 14.00	Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30	Dell G7 7590 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption		-117%	-86%	13%	36%	-74%
Idle Minimum *	5.5	17.6 -220%	18.3 -233%	5.2 5%	5.9 -7%	11.2 -104%
Idle Average *	9.3	24.7 -166%	22 -137%	12.2 -31%	8.1 13%	16.3 -75%
Idle Maximum *	15.8	56.3 -256%	28.8 -82%	14.3 9%	11.2 29%	46.2 -192%
Load Average *	92.2	111.1 -20%	93 -1%	67 27%	44.3 52%	123.3 -34%
Witcher 3 ultra *	112.4	149 -33%	142.6 -27%		41.9 63%	135.6 -21%
Load Maximum *	156.6	170 -9%	215.9 -38%	67 57%	50.2 68%	181.5 -16%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		19h 00min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 37min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 49min

	Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV R9 4900HS, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, 76 Wh	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 76 Wh	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 65 Wh	MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh	Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh	MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 i7-10710U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 52 Wh
Battery Runtime		-41%	-43%	-37%	-51%	-24%
Reader / Idle	1140	424 -63%			554 -51%	596 -48%
WiFi v1.3	577	268 -54%	330 -43%	362 -37%	332 -42%	351 -39%
Load	109	101 -7%			44 -60%	125 15%

Pro

+ Desempenho multi-thread da CPU insano para o tamanho

+ Sustentabilidade do desempenho da CPU respeitável

+ Formato compacto, leve e pequeno

+ Suporta carregamento USB Tipo C de terceiros

+ Suporte para 120 Hz e FreeSync

+ Teclas confortáveis

+ Forte rigidez da base

+ Fácil de fazer manutenção

+ RAM expansível

Contra

- Tempos de resposta em preto e branco relativamente lentos para um portátil para jogos

- Os ventiladores tendem a pulsar e estão sempre ativos; barulhentos durante jogos

- Alto consumo de energia no modo inativo; bateria com pouca duração

- Sem Thunderbolt 3, leitor SD ou RJ-45

- Apenas uma baia de armazenamento interno

- Sem iluminação RGB por tecla

- A tampa poderia ser mais rígida

- Botões do clickpad suaves

- Marco grosso "chin”

- Sem webcam

Veredicto: Desempenho a qualquer custo

In review: Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV. Test unit provided by Asus

Todos esses slides da AMD e vazamentos de benchmark comparando o Ryzen 9 ao Core i9 resultaram verdadeiros; a Ryzen 9 4900HS de 7 nm superará o Core i9-9880H de 14 nm em cargas de trabalho multithread por margens relativamente amplas, comparando-se com o melhor que o Core i9-9980HK tem a oferecer. Ao considerar que a CPU AMD móvel mais rápida neste ano passado foi a Ryzen 7 3750H, o novo Ryzen 9 4900HS representa um salto significante tanto no desempenho quanto no desempenho-por-Watt. A Intel terá muito o que fazer quando lançar a série Comet Lake-H de 10a geração nos próximos meses.

Além do novo processador AMD, estamos impressionados com o fato de a Asus ter conseguido acomodar tanto poder de computação em um chassi de 14 polegadas com marcos estreitos sem recorrer a um afogamento pesado. Estamos falando de um desempenho mais rápido que o do Core i9 no que é essencialmente um subportátil. A facilidade de manutenção, a RAM e o SSD atualizáveis, a tela FreeSync de 120 Hz, a iluminação exclusiva da tampa externa com LEDs micro e o carregamento USB tipo C estão no topo do bolo para tornar o Zephyrus G14 ainda mais exclusivo do que já é.

Há um pequeno número de desvantagens importantes. A primeira é a duração da bateria, que, na melhor das hipóteses, é apenas mediana para sua categoria. Em segundo lugar, o ruído do ventilador é alto e pulsa mais do que gostaríamos, o que será uma distração para os jogos sem um par de fones de ouvido. Em terceiro lugar, a tampa poderia ser mais rígida, pois flexiona mais, mesmo quando comparada com os próprios portáteis ZenBook da Asus. Por fim, o tempo de resposta do monitor em preto e branco de 20 ms é mais lento do que na maioria dos portáteis de jogos de 15,6 polegadas, nos quais painéis de 3 e 5 ms se tornaram comuns. É incrível poder jogar em um sistema tão pequeno e poderoso, mas o ghosting moderado e o ruído perceptível dos ventiladores lembram rapidamente as limitações atuais.

Se você viaja muito e consegue aproveitar a velocidade absurda, então o desempenho do Zephyrus G14 não decepcionará. As próximas alternativas mais próximas seriam o Razer Blade Stealth de 13,3 polegadas ou o MSI Prestige 14 de 14 polegadas, mas esses sistemas vêm "apenas" com CPUs Core U mais lentas e a GPU GTX 1650 Max-Q.

O Zephyrus G14 possui uma quantidade incrível de potência nunca antes vista nesse formato. Você perceberá lentamente as desvantagens ao longo do tempo, mas pode estar disposto a esquecê-las ao considerar o desempenho que está obtendo.

Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV - 2020-06-09 06/09/2020 v7
Allen Ngo

Acabamento

81 / 98 → 83%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

85%

Conectividade

55 / 80 → 69%

Peso

68 / 10-66 → 100%

Bateria

88 / 95 → 93%

Pantalha

86%

Desempenho do jogos

92%

Desempenho da aplicação

93%

Temperatura

91 / 95 → 95%

Ruído

78 / 90 → 87%

Audio

74%

Médio

75%

84%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5190 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus Zephyrus G14 Ryzen 9 GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q: Levando o Core i9 ao limite

Allen Ngo, 2020-03-31 (Update: 2020-04- 2)

Breve Análise do Portátil Asus Zephyrus G14 Ryzen 9 GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q: Levando o Core i9 ao limite

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Pro

Contra

Veredicto: Desempenho a qualquer custo

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare