Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition - Um verdadeiro smartphone para jogos
Comparison Devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89.1 % | 09/2020 | Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition SD 865, Adreno 650 | 240 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.59" | 2340x1080 | |
| 85.3 % | 07/2020 | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 SD 865, Adreno 650 | 222 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 84.2 % | 06/2022 | Nubia RedMagic 5G SD 865, Adreno 650 | 218 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.65" | 2340x1080 | |
| 88.5 % | 04/2020 | OnePlus 8 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650 | 199 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.78" | 3168x1440 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro | |
| Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G | |
| Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide angleWide angleUltra wide-angleZoomLow Light
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 625 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
| Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.59 | Asus ROG Phone 2 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.59 | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67 | Nubia RedMagic 5G OLED, 2340x1080, 6.65 | OnePlus 8 Pro AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.78 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -53% | -15% | -110% | 42% | |
| Brightness middle | 625 | 580 -7% | 619 -1% | 593 -5% | 796 27% |
| Brightness | 630 | 599 -5% | 616 -2% | 601 -5% | 779 24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 91 3% | 90 2% | 92 5% | 94 7% |
| Black Level * | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 4.9 -88% | 3.74 -44% | 8.1 -212% | 0.68 74% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.5 | 9.1 -102% | 7.94 -76% | 16.2 -260% | 1.55 66% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 5.4 -116% | 1.7 32% | 7.1 -184% | 1.1 56% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.17 101% | 2.188 101% | 2.28 96% | 2.237 98% |
| CCT | 6750 96% | 7487 87% | 6662 98% | 7566 86% | 6310 103% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 255.1 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 255.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 255.1 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17844 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4261 - 4304, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (13186 - 13589, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (9443 - 9739, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (527301 - 631025, n=24) | |
| VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4988 - 7649, n=4) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition (Chrome 84) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=20) | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition (Chrome 84) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83) | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 145.1, n=21) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=154, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chome 83) | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro (Chome 80) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=19) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition (Chrome 84) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition (Chrome 84) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=23) | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition (Chrome 84) | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 31224, n=23) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83) | |
| Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1623 - 2911, n=24) | |
| Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition (Chrome 84) | |
| OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=170, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 | Nubia RedMagic 5G | OnePlus 8 Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -10% | -26% | -14% | 18% | 7% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1697 | 1692 0% | 1654 -3% | 1627 -4% | 1759 ? 4% | 1512 ? -11% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 770 | 680 -12% | 388.4 -50% | 730 -5% | 1130 ? 47% | 1120 ? 45% |
| Random Read 4KB | 266.8 | 238.3 -11% | 201.6 -24% | 208.3 -22% | 282 ? 6% | 248 ? -7% |
| Random Write 4KB | 268.5 | 227.8 -15% | 193.6 -28% | 197.7 -26% | 309 ? 15% | 273 ? 2% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nubia RedMagic 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.02 / 0.32 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.91 / 1.47 / 1.49 Watt |
| Carga |
4 / 9.55 Watt |
    
| |
| Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition 6000 mAh | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 4720 mAh | Nubia RedMagic 5G 4500 mAh | OnePlus 8 Pro 4510 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -43% | -14% | -90% | -35% | -7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.91 | 1.2 -32% | 1.1 -21% | 2.2 -142% | 1.133 ? -25% | 0.896 ? 2% |
| Idle Average * | 1.47 | 2.1 -43% | 1.5 -2% | 3.3 -124% | 2.23 ? -52% | 1.447 ? 2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.49 | 2.5 -68% | 1.71 -15% | 3.7 -148% | 2.45 ? -64% | 1.622 ? -9% |
| Load Average * | 4 | 6.3 -58% | 4.84 -21% | 5.9 -48% | 5.26 ? -32% | 5.58 ? -40% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.55 | 10.7 -12% | 10.42 -9% | 8.3 13% | 9.68 ? -1% | 8.37 ? 12% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition 6000 mAh | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 4720 mAh | Nubia RedMagic 5G 4500 mAh | OnePlus 8 Pro 4510 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -35% | -46% | -14% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2104 | 1487 -29% | 2103 0% | |
| H.264 | 1674 | 899 -46% | 1023 -39% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 964 | 703 -27% | 614 -36% | 923 -4% |
| Load | 336 | 206 -39% | 149 -56% | 296 -12% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Bonanza de especificações
O Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition é um smartphone que vem com uma folha de especificações que não deixa nada a desejar. A falta de suporte para carregamento sem fio pode ser explicada pelo fato de que combinar o carregamento sem fio com um ventilador é uma coisa muito difícil de realizar e impermeabilizar um smartphone com uma saída de calor também será muito desafiador tecnologicamente. No entanto, há uma chance de que essas inovações possam vir com os dispositivos de próxima geração.
O Asus ROG Phone 3 vem com um hardware muito impressionante e é o melhor smartphone para jogos do mercado atualmente.
O smartphone oferece tudo o que o coração de um jogador pode desejar neste momento. Isso inclui um SoC rápido, uma tela HDR de 144 Hz altamente responsiva e brilhante, armazenamento muito rápido, bons alto-falantes, várias maneiras de conectar fones de ouvido e muitos acessórios. Para não falar dos gimmicks, como o indicador LED integrado.
No entanto, existem algumas coisas que podem ser criticadas. O brilho mínimo é simplesmente muito alto e apesar dos bons tempos de duração da bateria o smartphone poderia ter sido um pouco mais eficiente em termos de energia. Aqueles que desejam usar VoLTE ou Wi-Fi Calling terão que esperar, pois essas funções devem ser habilitadas em uma atualização futura. Mesmo que as câmeras sejam muito boas, elas ainda não conseguem acompanhar os dispositivos carros-chefes.
Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition
-
08/31/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt