Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone ASUS ROG Phone

Inge Schwabe, 👁 Florian Schmitt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/24/2018

Let's ROG Pare o Zen! Depois de anos de calma, a ASUS abriu o mundo dos jogos móveis com o seu primeiro smartphone. O ROG Phone tem mais na manga do que um processador rápido, muita RAM e material de marketing energético. A ASUS integrou botões de disparo no quadro do telefone, um conector de dock e incluiu um cooler ativo na caixa. Descubra em nossa análise detalhada se o ROG Phone faz o suficiente para obter as melhores notas.

Asus ROG Phone
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Octa-Core, 64 Bit
Placa gráfica
Memória
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Pantalha
6 polegadas 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, 10 multi-touch, AMOLED, 90 Hz, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 497 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado para fones e microfone de 3,5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Sensor de luz ambiente, bússola, sensor de digitais, Hall sensor, sensor de proximidade G-Sensor, Conector acessório de 48 pinos
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, EDGE/GPRS/GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19. LTE Cat.13: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46 , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.3 x 158.8 x 76.2
Bateria
20 Wh, 4000 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Sony IMX363 Dual Pixel image sensor, f/1.7, 26.6 mm (35 mm KB equivalent), OIS + 12 MP Wide Angle sensor
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo frontais, Teclado: Virtual, Carregador de 30 W, cabo USB Type-C para Type-C, ventilador, Ferramenta SIM, guia de início rápido, informação de segurança e garantia, ROG UI, Game-Center, 24 Meses Garantia, Rádio FM, Wi-Fi Direct, LTE Cat.13/Cat.16
peso
212 g, Suprimento de energia: 125 g
Preço
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

The ASUS ROG Phone with its detachable fan attached
The ASUS ROG Phone with its detachable fan attached
The ASUS ROG Phone with its detachable fan attached
A look at the back of the detachable fan with its Aura RGB ROG logo
The ASUS ROG Phone’s Aura RGB ROG logo
A closer look at the ROG Phone’s orange speaker grille

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s ∼100% +506%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 (min: 532, max: 642) MBit/s ∼99% +497%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 100, max: 534) MBit/s ∼79% +377%
Razer Phone 2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
604 (min: 420, max: 626) MBit/s ∼97% +486%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=302)
210 MBit/s ∼34% +104%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
116 MBit/s ∼19% +13%
Asus ROG Phone
Adreno 630, 845, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
103 (min: 86, max: 109) MBit/s ∼17%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
696 (min: 647, max: 714) MBit/s ∼100% +620%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 289, max: 805) MBit/s ∼95% +586%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s ∼86% +523%
Razer Phone 2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
388 (min: 234, max: 484) MBit/s ∼56% +301%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=302)
205 MBit/s ∼29% +112%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
117 MBit/s ∼17% +21%
Asus ROG Phone
Adreno 630, 845, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
96.7 (min: 50, max: 106) MBit/s ∼14%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810Tooltip
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø103 (86-109)
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø610 (568-626)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; Finale Firmware iperf 3.1.3: Ø615 (532-642)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø490 (100-534)
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø95.2 (50-106)
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø390 (269-484)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø696 (647-714)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; Finale Firmware iperf 3.1.3: Ø663 (289-805)
GPS test: ASUS ROG Phone – Overview
GPS test: ASUS ROG Phone – Overview
GPS test: ASUS ROG Phone – Bridge
GPS test: ASUS ROG Phone – Bridge
GPS test: ASUS ROG Phone – Cycling through a grove
GPS test: ASUS ROG Phone – Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Cycling through a grove
Main camera – Medium focal length
Main camera – Medium focal length
Main camera - Small focal length (wide angle)
Main camera - Small focal length (wide angle)
Main camera – Portrait mode
Main camera – Portrait mode

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
Our test chart in detail
TwinView Dock
TwinView Dock
WiGig Dock with Gamevice Controller
WiGig Dock with Gamevice Controller
Professional Dock
Professional Dock
Mobile Desktop Dock
Mobile Desktop Dock
606
cd/m²
613
cd/m²
720
cd/m²
602
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
670
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
717
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 720 cd/m² Médio: 637.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.38 cd/m²
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 597 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.12 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 7.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
114.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.203
Asus ROG Phone
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6
Razer Phone 2
IGZO LCD, UltraMotion 120 Hz Display, 2560x1440, 5.72
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Xiaomi Black Shark
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Screen
20%
36%
40%
-3%
Brightness middle
597
600
1%
576
-4%
656
10%
549
-8%
Brightness
637
577
-9%
582
-9%
659
3%
541
-15%
Brightness Distribution
83
92
11%
90
8%
88
6%
95
14%
Black Level *
0.31
0.42
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.12
3.43
33%
1.3
75%
1.7
67%
6.08
-19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.9
6.36
42%
3.5
68%
2.8
74%
10.69
2%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.3
4.4
40%
1.6
78%
1.7
77%
6.6
10%
Gamma
2.203 100%
2.388 92%
2.18 101%
1.998 110%
2.305 95%
CCT
7371 88%
6069 107%
6561 99%
6487 100%
8399 77%
Contrast
1935
1307

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 219 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 219 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 219 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8964 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5 ms rise
↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
14489 Points ∼100%
Razer Phone 2
13896 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
8938 Points ∼62% -38%
Xiaomi Black Shark
13620 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=19)
13635 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=196)
4525 Points ∼31% -69%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
9231 Points ∼82%
Razer Phone 2
9018 Points ∼80% -2%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
10024 Points ∼89% +9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
11244 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8453 Points ∼75% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=21)
8655 Points ∼77% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=246)
4306 Points ∼38% -53%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
2500 Points ∼52%
Razer Phone 2
2409 Points ∼50% -4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
3378 Points ∼71% +35%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4774 Points ∼100% +91%
Xiaomi Black Shark
2437 Points ∼51% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=21)
2417 Points ∼51% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=247)
1269 Points ∼27% -49%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
9430 Points ∼100%
Razer Phone 2
8701 Points ∼92% -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
9225 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8309 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8326 - 9868, n=22)
8018 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=254)
4550 Points ∼48% -52%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
9707 Points ∼77%
Razer Phone 2
10006 Points ∼80% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
12535 Points ∼100% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=20)
10123 Points ∼81% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=422)
4954 Points ∼40% -49%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
3040 Points ∼70%
Razer Phone 2
3540 Points ∼81% +16%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4364 Points ∼100% +44%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2723 Points ∼62% -10%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3577 Points ∼82% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2223 - 3764, n=22)
3110 Points ∼71% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2386 - 4439, n=276)
1707 Points ∼39% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
5673 Points ∼97%
Razer Phone 2
5825 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4250 Points ∼73% -25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4828 Points ∼83% -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5770 Points ∼99% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4209 - 8206, n=22)
5494 Points ∼94% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=276)
1467 Points ∼25% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
4757 Points ∼93%
Razer Phone 2
5094 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4275 Points ∼84% -10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4121 Points ∼81% -13%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5078 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3512 - 5189, n=22)
4646 Points ∼91% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1012 - 5189, n=279)
1361 Points ∼27% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
3763 Points ∼85%
Razer Phone 2
3532 Points ∼80% -6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4407 Points ∼100% +17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2961 Points ∼67% -21%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3570 Points ∼81% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2110 - 3763, n=21)
3081 Points ∼70% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=291)
1687 Points ∼38% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
8345 Points ∼80%
Razer Phone 2
8389 Points ∼81% +1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5854 Points ∼56% -30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
10374 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8451 Points ∼81% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5228 - 8451, n=21)
7720 Points ∼74% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=291)
2071 Points ∼20% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
6568 Points ∼99%
Razer Phone 2
6425 Points ∼96% -2%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5456 Points ∼82% -17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
6667 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Black Shark
6482 Points ∼97% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4054 - 6568, n=21)
5771 Points ∼87% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=292)
1734 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
3637 Points ∼87%
Razer Phone 2
3557 Points ∼85% -2%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4183 Points ∼100% +15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3027 Points ∼72% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3408 Points ∼81% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=21)
3268 Points ∼78% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=351)
1640 Points ∼39% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
5174 Points ∼99%
Razer Phone 2
5113 Points ∼98% -1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4206 Points ∼81% -19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3726 Points ∼71% -28%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5220 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5241, n=21)
4944 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=351)
1187 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
4730 Points ∼100%
Razer Phone 2
4660 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4201 Points ∼89% -11%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3544 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Black Shark
4668 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=21)
4424 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=359)
1134 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
3668 Points ∼88%
Razer Phone 2
3587 Points ∼86% -2%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4150 Points ∼100% +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2713 Points ∼65% -26%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3443 Points ∼83% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3668, n=21)
3129 Points ∼75% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=383)
1538 Points ∼37% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
8243 Points ∼99%
Razer Phone 2
8006 Points ∼96% -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5305 Points ∼64% -36%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
7055 Points ∼85% -14%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8312 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=21)
7818 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=383)
1632 Points ∼20% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
6454 Points ∼100%
Razer Phone 2
6285 Points ∼97% -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4996 Points ∼77% -23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
5205 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark
6324 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4529 - 6454, n=21)
5843 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=391)
1387 Points ∼21% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
37475 Points ∼100%
Razer Phone 2
35578 Points ∼95% -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
36755 Points ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
27717 Points ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Black Shark
31384 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=21)
33400 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=538)
12873 Points ∼34% -66%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
80283 Points ∼50%
Razer Phone 2
80333 Points ∼50% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
67730 Points ∼42% -16%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
159735 Points ∼100% +99%
Xiaomi Black Shark
82423 Points ∼52% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 84998, n=21)
80111 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=538)
17989 Points ∼11% -78%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
64029 Points ∼83%
Razer Phone 2
62783 Points ∼81% -2%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
57047 Points ∼74% -11%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
77599 Points ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60543 Points ∼78% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=21)
60990 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=539)
15106 Points ∼19% -76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
150 fps ∼66%
Razer Phone 2
152 fps ∼67% +1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
120 fps ∼53% -20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
226 fps ∼100% +51%
Xiaomi Black Shark
151 fps ∼67% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=22)
144 fps ∼64% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=563)
31.3 fps ∼14% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
89 fps ∼100%
Razer Phone 2
89 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
61 fps ∼69% -31%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
60 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60 fps ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=21)
62.7 fps ∼70% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=566)
24.9 fps ∼28% -72%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
83 fps ∼78%
Razer Phone 2
83 fps ∼78% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
73 fps ∼68% -12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
107 fps ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Black Shark
82 fps ∼77% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=21)
73 fps ∼68% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=485)
16.8 fps ∼16% -80%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
75 fps ∼100%
Razer Phone 2
56 fps ∼75% -25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
42 fps ∼56% -44%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
59 fps ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Black Shark
59 fps ∼79% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 75, n=21)
55 fps ∼73% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=488)
16 fps ∼21% -79%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
60 fps ∼87%
Razer Phone 2
61 fps ∼88% +2%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
29 fps ∼42% -52%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
69.3 fps ∼100% +16%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60 fps ∼87% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=22)
54.4 fps ∼78% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=348)
14.4 fps ∼21% -76%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
54 fps ∼92%
Razer Phone 2
37 fps ∼63% -31%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
26 fps ∼44% -52%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
58.9 fps ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Black Shark
53 fps ∼90% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 59, n=21)
46.5 fps ∼79% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=351)
13.9 fps ∼24% -74%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
21 fps ∼65%
Razer Phone 2
15 fps ∼47% -29%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
19 fps ∼59% -10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
32.1 fps ∼100% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 25, n=10)
19.8 fps ∼62% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=61)
10.3 fps ∼32% -51%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
14 fps ∼86%
Razer Phone 2
14 fps ∼86% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
13 fps ∼80% -7%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
16.3 fps ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (11 - 31, n=10)
15.4 fps ∼94% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=61)
6.56 fps ∼40% -53%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
34 fps ∼72%
Razer Phone 2
23 fps ∼49% -32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
18 fps ∼38% -47%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
47 fps ∼100% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (20 - 40, n=10)
28.5 fps ∼61% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=61)
14.5 fps ∼31% -57%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
37 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
33 fps ∼89% -11%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
36.8 fps ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (29 - 38, n=9)
35 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 63, n=60)
15.9 fps ∼43% -57%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
35 fps ∼88%
Razer Phone 2
35 fps ∼88% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
31 fps ∼78% -11%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
40 fps ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Black Shark
35 fps ∼88% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=21)
34 fps ∼85% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=279)
9.88 fps ∼25% -72%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
31 fps ∼100%
Razer Phone 2
22 fps ∼71% -29%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
16 fps ∼52% -48%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
31 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark
31 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (17 - 37, n=21)
28.3 fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=282)
8.89 fps ∼29% -71%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
299878 Points ∼99%
Razer Phone 2
285952 Points ∼94% -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
300617 Points ∼99% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
302955 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark
290397 Points ∼96% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=22)
275958 Points ∼91% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=169)
118333 Points ∼39% -61%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
242953 Points ∼97%
Razer Phone 2
232418 Points ∼93% -4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
250848 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Black Shark
230642 Points ∼92% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=18)
223967 Points ∼89% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=386)
76035 Points ∼30% -69%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
1336 Points ∼77%
Razer Phone 2
1226 Points ∼71% -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
1424 Points ∼82% +7%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
1731 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi Black Shark
1243 Points ∼72% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=20)
1348 Points ∼78% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=498)
698 Points ∼40% -48%
Graphics (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
7957 Points ∼51%
Razer Phone 2
8001 Points ∼51% +1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
6273 Points ∼40% -21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
15659 Points ∼100% +97%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5846 Points ∼37% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=20)
7816 Points ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=498)
1738 Points ∼11% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
5296 Points ∼84%
Razer Phone 2
3906 Points ∼62% -26%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
6283 Points ∼100% +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
1815 Points ∼29% -66%
Xiaomi Black Shark
2871 Points ∼46% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=20)
3594 Points ∼57% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=498)
1244 Points ∼20% -77%
System (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
8613 Points ∼74%
Razer Phone 2
8120 Points ∼70% -6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
8604 Points ∼74% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
11675 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Black Shark
7105 Points ∼61% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4417 - 8613, n=20)
7657 Points ∼66% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=498)
2508 Points ∼21% -71%
Overall (sort by value)
Asus ROG Phone
4693 Points ∼96%
Razer Phone 2
4200 Points ∼86% -11%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4687 Points ∼96% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4895 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3489 Points ∼71% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3291 - 4693, n=20)
4099 Points ∼84% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=502)
1254 Points ∼26% -73%

Legend

 
Asus ROG Phone Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Razer Phone 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
273.01 Points ∼100% +200%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
109.18 Points ∼40% +20%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)
90.938 Points ∼33%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)
88.869 Points ∼33% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=22)
76.9 Points ∼28% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=421)
36.7 Points ∼13% -60%
Xiaomi Black Shark
Points ∼0% -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points ∼100% +136%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
23285 Points ∼54% +27%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)
18275 Points ∼42%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)
17067 Points ∼40% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=22)
15431 Points ∼36% -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
13663 Points ∼32% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=556)
5550 Points ∼13% -70%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=577)
11486 ms * ∼100% -433%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=22)
2874 ms * ∼25% -33%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
2287 ms * ∼20% -6%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)
2282.6 ms * ∼20% -6%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)
2154 ms * ∼19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
1951.9 ms * ∼17% +9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603.1 ms * ∼5% +72%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points ∼100% +50%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
124 Points ∼80% +20%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)
103 Points ∼66%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)
96 Points ∼62% -7%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
90 Points ∼58% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=15)
84.5 Points ∼55% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=62)
63.6 Points ∼41% -38%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
347 Points ∼100% +30%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
334 Points ∼96% +26%
Asus ROG Phone (Chrome 70)
266 Points ∼77%
Razer Phone 2 (Chrome 68)
263 Points ∼76% -1%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
246 Points ∼71% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (260 - 291, n=21)
233 Points ∼67% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 362, n=283)
111 Points ∼32% -58%

* ... smaller is better

Asus ROG PhoneRazer Phone 2Huawei Mate 20 ProXiaomi Black SharkSony Xperia XZ3Average 512 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-29%
4%
-13%
-29%
0%
-74%
Random Write 4KB
152.03
23.99
-84%
157.84
4%
114.1
-25%
22.22
-85%
152
0%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=606)
-89%
Random Read 4KB
141.61
124.31
-12%
157.42
11%
127.2
-10%
135.67
-4%
142
0%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=606)
-73%
Sequential Write 256KB
243.3
194.81
-20%
196.39
-19%
199.6
-18%
196.14
-19%
243
0%
79.7 (2.99 - 246, n=606)
-67%
Sequential Read 256KB
724.68
733.22
1%
853.28
18%
741.5
2%
680.98
-6%
725
0%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=606)
-68%
Game Genie pop-up menu
Game Genie pop-up menu
Game Genie settings
Game Genie settings
Arena of Valor with ASUS ROG overlays
Arena of Valor with ASUS ROG overlays
Subway Surfers
Zen Pinball
Subway Surfers
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 default60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min31 fps
 high HD61 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 42.2 °C42.2 °C39.8 °C 
 43.6 °C43.3 °C41.1 °C 
 44 °C43 °C39.4 °C 
Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 42.1 °C
35.8 °C38.9 °C40.4 °C
36 °C39.2 °C40.4 °C
39.1 °C45 °C41.7 °C
Máximo: 45 °C
Médio: 39.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  45.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.328.92538.129.63128.530.34031.433.25036.632.76324.625.58024.124.910020.524.91251926.316016.936.420019.149.725016.652.631513.957.14001563.550014.662.763012.35980011.862.6100011.866.9125011.969.3160011.468200011.270.4250011.570.2315011.371.3400010.966500010.561.8630010.761.7800010.665.31000010.567.81250010.6671600010.654SPL59.260.264.357.22479.6N12.514.116.810.40.544.8median 11.8median 62.7Delta2.27.930.331.538.130.828.537.931.434.136.634.224.62824.126.520.524.81925.816.936.119.150.516.652.413.955.41561.314.663.112.364.211.865.111.866.811.96711.46511.265.611.56511.364.510.963.810.561.410.764.910.667.610.567.310.663.510.654.260.264.357.22477.114.116.810.40.541.3median 11.8median 63.82.2730.7362524.126.829.926.328.729.836.127.429.62128.119.527.418.835.719.247.517.645.516.947.315.8541552.31553.614.753.914.859.814.664.114.366.413.467.914.469.314.464.714.8661568.514.866.314.765.51562.914.957.215.255.815.745.326.877.70.938.7median 15median 57.21.28.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG PhoneRazer Phone 2Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Phone audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Razer Phone 2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Mate 20 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.6 / 1.4 / 1.7 Watt
Carga midlight 3.8 / 10.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG Phone
4000 mAh
Razer Phone 2
4000 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ3
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-33%
-24%
-10%
-19%
2%
-19%
-10%
Idle Minimum *
0.6
0.6
-0%
0.95
-58%
1
-67%
0.8
-33%
0.8
-33%
0.802 (0.42 - 1.8, n=19)
-34%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=634)
-47%
Idle Average *
1.4
1.5
-7%
2.17
-55%
1.4
-0%
1.5
-7%
1.2
14%
1.722 (0.67 - 2.9, n=19)
-23%
1.721 (0.6 - 6.2, n=633)
-23%
Idle Maximum *
1.7
2.6
-53%
2.25
-32%
1.7
-0%
2.3
-35%
1.5
12%
2.1 (0.87 - 3.5, n=19)
-24%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=634)
-18%
Load Average *
3.8
7.2
-89%
4.47
-18%
4.6
-21%
4.8
-26%
4.8
-26%
4.79 (3.64 - 7.2, n=19)
-26%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=628)
-6%
Load Maximum *
10.6
12.3
-16%
6.15
42%
6.7
37%
10.1
5%
6.2
42%
9.2 (6.2 - 12.3, n=19)
13%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=628)
46%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
18h 30min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 20min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 36min
Asus ROG Phone
4000 mAh
Razer Phone 2
4000 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
9%
35%
15%
25%
Reader / Idle
1110
1630
47%
1747
57%
1305
18%
1753
58%
H.264
800
742
-7%
854
7%
801
0%
747
-7%
WiFi v1.3
533
531
0%
767
44%
742
39%
711
33%
Load
216
206
-5%
282
31%
223
3%
253
17%

Pro

+ Botões de disparo no quadro
+ Conector dock
+ Cooler (incluído)
+ Snapdragon 845
+ 8GB de RAM
+ USB 3.1 Tipo C
+ Dual SIM
+ Alto falantes estéreo frontais
+ Câmera dupla
+ Logotipo Aura RGB
+ Tela brilhante
+ Gorilla Glass 6
+ Qualcomm QuickCharge 4.0
+ Software adicional para jogos decente
+ Diversos acessórios

Contra

- Wi-Fi lento
- Curta duração da bateria
- Sem armazenamento expansível
- Sem VoLTE
- Resolução de tela comparativamente baixa
- Pesado
- Caro
The ASUS ROG Phone smartphone review. Test device courtesy of ASUS Germany
The ASUS ROG Phone smartphone review. Test device courtesy of ASUS Germany

A ASUS estabeleceu novos padrões com o seu ROG Phone, embora a primeira geração tenha espaço para melhorias. A empresa foi com tudo com os acessórios para jogos no ROG Phone, que são bastante caros. Além disso, seu monitor de 90 Hz é ideal para jogos, enquanto seus gatilhos ultrassônicos e software de jogos são adições úteis.

O ASUS ROG Phone define novos padrões para jogos de smartphone. O dispositivo é poderoso, e a ASUS tentou criar um ecossistema de jogos com vários acessórios, mas o dispositivo tem algumas desvantagens que impedem a obtenção de notas altas.

A iluminação AURA RGB é um toque agradável, enquanto o sistema de resfriamento da câmara de vapor é ótimo para dissipar o calor. Além disso, as câmeras são melhores do que esperávamos. Infelizmente, o nosso dispositivo de teste tem uma duração de bateria e Wi-Fi fracos. No geral, o ROG Phone é um ótimo smartphone que tem espaço para melhorar.

Asus ROG Phone - 11/18/2018 v6
Inge Schwabe

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
78 / 75 → 100%
Mouse
98%
Conectividade
52 / 60 → 87%
Peso
88%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
70 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
83 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
86%
Ruído
100%
Audio
87 / 91 → 96%
Camera
80%
Médio
83%
88%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone ASUS ROG Phone
Inge Schwabe, 2018-11-24 (Update: 2018-11-28)