Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Black Shark 3 – Potência de jogos com efeitos de LED

Jogos acessíveis? O Xiaomi Black Shark 3 mais uma vez oferece uma experiência de jogo barata e um exterior incomum. Embora falte alguns recursos em comparação com o modelo Pro, é mais barato e mais compacto em troca. Vamos ver se a Xiaomi conseguiu criar algo que será capaz de satisfazer a comunidade de gamers.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto),
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Black Shark Serie)
Processador
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Placa gráfica
Memória
8192 MB 
Pantalha
6.67 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 90 Hz
Disco rígido
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 128 GB UFS, 108 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41), 5G (n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 10.4 x 168.7 x 77.3
Bateria
4720 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Qualcomm Quick Charge 4+ até 65 watts
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Sistema Operativo
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/​1.8, phase detection AF, LED flash, videos @2160p/​60FPS (câmera 1); 13.0MP, f/​2.25, lente grande ângular (câmera 2); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, depth of field (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/​2.2, Videos @1080p/​30FPS
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo (híbridos), Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB, SIM tool, protetor de silicone, 24 Meses Garantia, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS; LED de notificações (back/multi-colored); , fanless
peso
222 g, Suprimento de energia: 82 g
Preço
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85 %
07/2020
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
SD 865, Adreno 650
222 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080
87 %
04/2019
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
SD 855, Adreno 640
205 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.39"2340x1080
85 %
06/2020
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
253 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash7.1"3120x1440
88 %
06/2020
OnePlus 8
SD 865, Adreno 650
180 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
84 %
Nubia RedMagic 5G
SD 865, Adreno 650
218 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.65"2340x1080
88 %
04/2020
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
188 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"3200x1440
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Xiaomi Black Shark 3

Size Comparison

177.8 mm 83.3 mm 10.1 mm 253 g168.7 mm 77.3 mm 10.4 mm 222 g168.56 mm 78 mm 9.75 mm 218 g163.61 mm 75.01 mm 8.77 mm 205 g161.9 mm 73.7 mm 7.8 mm 188 g160.2 mm 72.9 mm 8 mm 180 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
946 (min: 911, max: 960) MBit/s ∼100% +39%
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
894 (min: 864, max: 925) MBit/s ∼95% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
835 (min: 808, max: 847) MBit/s ∼88% +23%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
817 (min: 785, max: 843) MBit/s ∼86% +20%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
679 (min: 601, max: 733) MBit/s ∼72%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
586 (min: 267, max: 693) MBit/s ∼62% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=562)
267 MBit/s ∼28% -61%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
937 (min: 466, max: 960) MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
926 (min: 463, max: 960) MBit/s ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
923 (min: 783, max: 956) MBit/s ∼99%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
876 (min: 785, max: 909) MBit/s ∼93% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
863 (min: 759, max: 898) MBit/s ∼92% -7%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
527 (min: 410, max: 577) MBit/s ∼56% -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=562)
253 MBit/s ∼27% -73%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø678 (601-733)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø923 (783-956)
Locating Garmin Edge 520 - overview
Locating Garmin Edge 520 - overview
Locating Garmin Edge 520 - roundabout
Locating Garmin Edge 520 - roundabout
Locating Garmin Edge 520 - bridge
Locating Garmin Edge 520 - bridge
Locating Xiaomi Black Shark 3 - overview
Locating Xiaomi Black Shark 3 - overview
Locating Xiaomi Black Shark 3 - roundabout
Locating Xiaomi Black Shark 3 - roundabout
Locating Xiaomi Black Shark 3 - bridge
Locating Xiaomi Black Shark 3 - bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
21.7 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
31 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
23 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
23 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
27 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
29.3 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Black Shark 3: 26.71 ∆E min: 12.23 - max: 38.84 ∆E
ColorChecker
16.2 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
2 ∆E
12 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Black Shark 3: 10.16 ∆E min: 2 - max: 16.92 ∆E
583
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
648
cd/m²
582
cd/m²
619
cd/m²
648
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
609
cd/m²
650
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 650 cd/m² Médio: 615.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.34 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 619 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.74 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.188
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 7.1
OnePlus 8
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Nubia RedMagic 5G
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.65
Samsung Galaxy S20+
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7
Screen
-49%
-37%
35%
-91%
22%
Brightness middle
619
409
-34%
570
-8%
778
26%
593
-4%
740
20%
Brightness
616
412
-33%
589
-4%
783
27%
601
-2%
747
21%
Brightness Distribution
90
95
6%
90
0%
95
6%
92
2%
94
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.74
5.2
-39%
4.65
-24%
0.9
76%
8.1
-117%
2.6
30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.94
8.9
-12%
7.61
4%
2.2
72%
16.2
-104%
4.57
42%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
4.8
-182%
4.9
-188%
1.7
-0%
7.1
-318%
1.5
12%
Gamma
2.188 101%
2.21 100%
2.205 100%
2.25 98%
2.28 96%
2.269 97%
CCT
6662 98%
7430 87%
7500 87%
6481 100%
7566 86%
6284 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 227.3 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 227.3 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 227.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17901 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
OpenCL Score 5.2 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3310 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3158 - 3310, n=2)
3234 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (387 - 3310, n=10)
1756 Points ∼53% -47%
Vulkan Score 5.2 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3382 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3059 - 3382, n=2)
3221 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (453 - 3382, n=10)
1697 Points ∼50% -50%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3449 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3361 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3427 Points ∼99% -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3076 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2899 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3076 - 3449, n=10)
3312 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (445 - 3531, n=90)
1990 Points ∼58% -42%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
924 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
903 Points ∼96% -2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
919 Points ∼97% -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
909 Points ∼96% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
944 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (903 - 924, n=10)
913 Points ∼97% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=90)
568 Points ∼60% -39%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9822 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8342 Points ∼65% -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10945 Points ∼85% +11%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10800 Points ∼84% +10%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12879 Points ∼100% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10583 Points ∼82% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9822 - 13202, n=11)
11312 Points ∼88% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=492)
5837 Points ∼45% -41%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12612 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10330 Points ∼70% -18%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11839 Points ∼80% -6%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13079 Points ∼89% +4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13954 Points ∼95% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
14760 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11839 - 19711, n=10)
13515 Points ∼92% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=650)
6377 Points ∼43% -49%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5780 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4535 Points ∼78% -22%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5401 Points ∼93% -7%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5532 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4495 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5187 - 5780, n=9)
5429 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=498)
2175 Points ∼38% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9157 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7108 Points ∼74% -22%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9542 Points ∼100% +4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9467 Points ∼99% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9190 Points ∼96% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (9157 - 9567, n=9)
9408 Points ∼99% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=498)
2074 Points ∼22% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8105 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6312 Points ∼77% -22%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8153 Points ∼100% +1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8154 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7459 Points ∼91% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7957 - 8204, n=10)
8086 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=499)
1926 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5765 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4462 Points ∼77% -23%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5406 Points ∼94% -6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5532 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4455 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3956 - 5765, n=9)
5009 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=528)
2085 Points ∼36% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12843 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10300 Points ∼80% -20%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12873 Points ∼100% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12750 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9471 Points ∼74% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (12547 - 12895, n=9)
12716 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=528)
2763 Points ∼21% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10090 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7980 Points ∼79% -21%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9850 Points ∼98% -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9877 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7576 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8499 - 10090, n=9)
9458 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=528)
2322 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5209 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4262 Points ∼82% -18%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4879 Points ∼94% -6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5209 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4180 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (4582 - 5209, n=9)
4956 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=578)
2062 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8284 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6362 Points ∼75% -23%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8288 Points ∼98% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8432 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8469 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8045 - 8432, n=9)
8282 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=578)
1734 Points ∼20% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7323 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5734 Points ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7174 Points ∼98% -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7305 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6896 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (7012 - 7323, n=10)
7198 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7323, n=579)
1658 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5274 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4240 Points ∼80% -20%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4819 Points ∼91% -9%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5049 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4124 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (3965 - 5274, n=9)
4783 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=620)
1925 Points ∼36% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11557 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9983 Points ∼80% -14%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11540 Points ∼92% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12494 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6392 Points ∼51% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11371 - 12494, n=9)
11794 Points ∼94% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=619)
2278 Points ∼18% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9138 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7673 Points ∼81% -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8810 Points ∼93% -4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9492 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5696 Points ∼60% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8215 - 9492, n=9)
8887 Points ∼94% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=622)
1963 Points ∼21% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
58293 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
45072 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
57583 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27026 Points ∼46% -54%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
26182 Points ∼45% -55%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
27431 Points ∼47% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (26182 - 58293, n=9)
36070 Points ∼62% -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=768)
15261 Points ∼26% -74%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
154375 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
110432 Points ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
149468 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
144611 Points ∼94% -6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
150654 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
48476 Points ∼31% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (144611 - 154375, n=9)
148492 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=766)
25927 Points ∼17% -83%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
112989 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
83518 Points ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
110468 Points ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
72524 Points ∼64% -36%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
73143 Points ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
41415 Points ∼37% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (72524 - 112989, n=9)
85586 Points ∼76% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=766)
20383 Points ∼18% -82%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
206 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
203 fps ∼98% -1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
207 fps ∼100% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
206 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
199 fps ∼96% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (202 - 207, n=10)
204 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=773)
43.9 fps ∼21% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼67%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
90 fps ∼100% +50%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
90 fps ∼100% +50%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (60 - 90, n=10)
72 fps ∼80% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=782)
30.5 fps ∼34% -49%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
120 fps ∼95%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
102 fps ∼81% -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
122 fps ∼97% +2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
125 fps ∼99% +4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
126 fps ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
126 fps ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (120 - 126, n=10)
124 fps ∼98% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=678)
25.9 fps ∼21% -78%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼68%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
68 fps ∼77% +13%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼100% +47%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (58 - 88, n=10)
69 fps ∼78% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=686)
21.8 fps ∼25% -64%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
82 fps ∼93%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
71 fps ∼81% -13%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼98% +5%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼100% +7%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
74 fps ∼84% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
85 fps ∼97% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (74 - 88, n=11)
85.3 fps ∼97% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=541)
20.8 fps ∼24% -75%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
60 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
43 fps ∼72% -28%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
59 fps ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (43 - 77, n=11)
58.1 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=543)
19 fps ∼32% -68%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps ∼91%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
25 fps ∼76% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27 fps ∼82% -10%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps ∼94% +3%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28 fps ∼85% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
33 fps ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (18 - 31, n=11)
27.5 fps ∼83% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=290)
11.2 fps ∼34% -63%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼91%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼77% -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼91% 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼91% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼91% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
22 fps ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (20 - 20, n=11)
20 fps ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=288)
8.03 fps ∼37% -60%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
45 fps ∼85%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps ∼72% -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼100% +18%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps ∼91% +7%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
44 fps ∼83% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
52 fps ∼98% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (28 - 53, n=11)
43.6 fps ∼82% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=294)
16.6 fps ∼31% -63%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
52 fps ∼90%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps ∼74% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27 fps ∼47% -48%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼93% +4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼93% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
58 fps ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (27 - 54, n=11)
51 fps ∼88% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=293)
19.3 fps ∼33% -63%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
49 fps ∼94%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼81% -14%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼98% +4%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
52 fps ∼100% +6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼98% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
51 fps ∼98% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (49 - 52, n=11)
50.6 fps ∼97% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=466)
14 fps ∼27% -71%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
41 fps ∼89%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼78% -12%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
25 fps ∼54% -39%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps ∼100% +12%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
42 fps ∼91% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
45 fps ∼98% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (25 - 46, n=11)
38.9 fps ∼85% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=470)
12.5 fps ∼27% -70%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
574589 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
572807 Points ∼94% 0%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
563466 Points ∼93% -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
607937 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
296746 Points ∼49% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (557310 - 607937, n=11)
580619 Points ∼96% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=95)
314806 Points ∼52% -45%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1395 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1264 Points ∼84% -9%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1429 Points ∼95% +2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1498 Points ∼100% +7%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1505 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
1378 Points ∼92% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (1276 - 1576, n=10)
1450 Points ∼96% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=710)
808 Points ∼54% -42%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11747 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8125 Points ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11445 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11654 Points ∼99% -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11648 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10803 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (11445 - 11842, n=10)
11655 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=710)
2431 Points ∼21% -79%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5564 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3560 Points ∼42% -36%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5688 Points ∼68% +2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6912 Points ∼82% +24%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8398 Points ∼100% +51%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3775 Points ∼45% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5564 - 8874, n=10)
7263 Points ∼86% +31%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=710)
1810 Points ∼22% -67%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8421 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5993 Points ∼60% -29%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8622 Points ∼86% +2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10021 Points ∼100% +19%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9723 Points ∼97% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9281 Points ∼93% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (8421 - 10147, n=10)
9643 Points ∼96% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=710)
3379 Points ∼34% -60%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5264 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3847 Points ∼63% -27%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5302 Points ∼86% +1%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5897 Points ∼96% +12%
Nubia RedMagic 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6149 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4779 Points ∼78% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
  (5264 - 6273, n=10)
5845 Points ∼95% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=710)
1719 Points ∼28% -67%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)
66.292 Points ∼100%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
61.492 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50.9 - 69.5, n=10)
61.3 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
53.053 Points ∼80% -20%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
51.341 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
50.566 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
45.538 Points ∼69% -31%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=172)
40.2 Points ∼61% -39%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)
117.37 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (79.1 - 120, n=9)
110 Points ∼94% -6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
103.45 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
89.329 Points ∼76% -24%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
79.083 Points ∼67% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=601)
46.4 Points ∼40% -60%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chome 83)
70.9 runs/min ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
67.7 runs/min ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50.8 - 74.5, n=10)
65.4 runs/min ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chome 80)
62.8 runs/min ∼89% -11%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
59.6 runs/min ∼84% -16%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
50.8 runs/min ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
46.7 runs/min ∼66% -34%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=156)
43.1 runs/min ∼61% -39%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)
104 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (99 - 118, n=10)
103 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
101 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
99 Points ∼95% -5%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
99 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
94 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
86 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=237)
69.9 Points ∼67% -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (15745 - 24369, n=10)
21331 Points ∼100% +34%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
21048 Points ∼99% +32%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
20976 Points ∼98% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
18094 Points ∼85% +14%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
17011 Points ∼80% +7%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)
15901 Points ∼75%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
15745 Points ∼74% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=768)
7701 Points ∼36% -52%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=794)
9883 ms * ∼100% -310%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
2538.1 ms * ∼26% -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)
2528.6 ms * ∼26% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
2488.3 ms * ∼25% -3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)
2410.7 ms * ∼24%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)
2401.34 ms * ∼24% -0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)
2061.3 ms * ∼21% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2000 - 2538, n=11)
1956 ms * ∼20% +19%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Black Shark 3Xiaomi Black Shark 2Xiaomi Black Shark 3 ProOnePlus 8Nubia RedMagic 5GSamsung Galaxy S20+Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-63%
-3%
-3%
-19%
-5%
-16%
-81%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
57.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
59.3 (54.5 - 66.4, n=7)
50.7 (1.7 - 87.1, n=509)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
66.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
72 (66.3 - 81.6, n=7)
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=509)
Random Write 4KB
227.8
25
-89%
261.45
15%
203.85
-11%
193.57
-15%
229.8
1%
186 (29.9 - 230, n=10)
-18%
33.2 (0.14 - 319, n=858)
-85%
Random Read 4KB
238.3
145.18
-39%
218.2
-8%
215
-10%
201.64
-15%
199.6
-16%
199 (170 - 238, n=10)
-16%
57.2 (1.59 - 324, n=858)
-76%
Sequential Write 256KB
679.6
195.65
-71%
657.92
-3%
747.87
10%
388.38
-43%
694.3
2%
542 (213 - 697, n=10)
-20%
122 (2.99 - 911, n=858)
-82%
Sequential Read 256KB
1692.2
792.81
-53%
1398.36
-17%
1706.7
1%
1654.41
-2%
1603.1
-5%
1529 (1406 - 1692, n=10)
-10%
330 (12.1 - 1802, n=858)
-80%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.19.0: Ø59.9 (59-61)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.19.0: Ø60 (59-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.3.4a: Ø29.1 (25-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.3.4a: Ø29.5 (24-31)
Carga Máxima
 39.5 °C40.6 °C40.9 °C 
 39.8 °C41.8 °C41.6 °C 
 39.7 °C40.2 °C41.1 °C 
Máximo: 41.8 °C
Médio: 40.6 °C
37.2 °C39.7 °C37.4 °C
37.4 °C40.6 °C37.4 °C
39.1 °C41.2 °C38.7 °C
Máximo: 41.2 °C
Médio: 38.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  37.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.840.62539.940.53131.935.64038.938.75043.740.36329.8348025.924.710026.325.712524.92716021.634.92001940.925018.94631518.152.640016.660.250016.263.563014.967.68001568.6100015.668.4125014.968.9160014.970.9200015.669.4250014.668.3315014.273.2400014.170.3500014.467.3630014.659.7800014.961.31000015.261.91250015.462.71600015.754SPL68.76666.36470.627.580.8N22.418.319.715.825.3146.9median 15.4median 62.7Delta2.110.432.536.629.424.822.826.425.32730.23323.326.121.923.21921.419.625.21944.516.148.518.954.316.657.214.358.51560.715.262.914.364.314.366.814.269.714.871.914.874.514.475.114.374.314.674.114.770.114.968.414.965.714.666.714.863.515.447.726.883.40.953.4median 14.8median 64.31.49.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Black Shark 3Nubia RedMagic 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Nubia RedMagic 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.2 / 2.1 / 2.5 Watt
Carga midlight 6.3 / 10.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
4720 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
5000 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20+
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
41%
-18%
19%
19%
8%
2%
28%
Idle Minimum *
1.2
0.73
39%
1.5
-25%
0.9
25%
1.1
8%
1
17%
1.251 (0.53 - 2.2, n=10)
-4%
0.887 (0.2 - 3.4, n=866)
26%
Idle Average *
2.1
1.01
52%
2.3
-10%
2.3
-10%
1.5
29%
1.7
19%
2.25 (1.19 - 3.43, n=10)
-7%
1.754 (0.6 - 6.2, n=865)
16%
Idle Maximum *
2.5
1.13
55%
3.1
-24%
2.33
7%
1.71
32%
2.3
8%
2.55 (1.23 - 4, n=10)
-2%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=866)
18%
Load Average *
6.3
3.64
42%
7.4
-17%
3.5
44%
4.84
23%
5.8
8%
5.28 (3.5 - 7.4, n=10)
16%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=860)
35%
Load Maximum *
10.7
8.86
17%
12.3
-15%
7.68
28%
10.42
3%
11.8
-10%
9.82 (7.68 - 12.3, n=10)
8%
6.04 (1.2 - 14.2, n=860)
44%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
24h 47min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 59min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 26min
Xiaomi Black Shark 3
4720 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark 2
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
5000 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Nubia RedMagic 5G
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S20+
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
11%
11%
-21%
16%
Reader / Idle
1487
952
-36%
1589
7%
1374
-8%
2041
37%
H.264
899
666
-26%
972
8%
1096
22%
978
9%
WiFi v1.3
703
774
10%
767
9%
1045
49%
614
-13%
794
13%
Load
206
295
43%
247
20%
168
-18%
149
-28%
218
6%

Pro

+ Bom valor
+ Tela fluente de 90-Hz
+ Desempenho veloz
+ Efeitos de iluminação extravagantes na à parte traseira
+ Sem afogamento no uso intenso prolongado
+ Ampla variedade de acessórios disponível
+ A câmera capturas boas fotos
+ Navegação confiável
+ Wi-Fi rápido

Contra

- Sem NFC
- Sem carregamento sem fio
- Sem certificação IP
- 90 Hz não disponível em muitos jogos
- Duração de bateria bastante curta

Veredicto – Muito desempenho...mas não por muito

In review: Xiaomi Black Shark 3
In review: Xiaomi Black Shark 3

O Xiaomi Black Shark 3 tem muitos recursos que os jogadores esperam: Um design extraordinário, porém bem pensado, desempenho extremamente rápido, armazenamento interno rápido, uma solução de refrigeração confiável e uma boa tela.

No entanto, o dispositivo não está livre de falhas e a duração da bateria poderia ter sido maior em sessões de jogos mais longas, o alto índice de atualização da tela nos jogos não é tão abrangente quanto gostaríamos e os alto-falantes têm espaço para melhorias também. Dito isto, alguns compromissos são inevitáveis, uma vez que o Black Shark 3 dá aos usuários acesso ao mundo dos jogos por apenas 599 Euros (~ US$ 685). Isso também inclui a falta de certificação IP, carregamento sem fio e NFC. O último é particularmente surpreendente, uma vez que os pagamentos móveis estão se tornando cada vez mais importantes.

Comparado ao modelo Pro, não há botões nas esquinas dedicados, no entanto, existem muitos acessórios para jogos, alguns dos quais são incrivelmente convenientes.

O Black Shark 3 está muito rápido, mas sua duração da bateria é apenas média.

Em suma, o Black Shark 3 é uma alternativa barata para todos aqueles que procuram principalmente alto desempenho nos jogos. Para quem não gosta de design, ainda é um smartphone relativamente acessível, porém poderoso, com uma tela de 90 Hz. De qualquer forma, a duração da bateria não deve ser uma prioridade.

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 - 07/20/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
84%
Teclado
68 / 75 → 90%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
50 / 70 → 71%
Peso
88%
Bateria
89%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
62 / 64 → 97%
Desempenho da aplicação
80 / 86 → 93%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
68 / 90 → 76%
Camera
71%
Médio
79%
85%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Black Shark 3 – Potência de jogos com efeitos de LED
Florian Schmitt, 2020-07-24 (Update: 2020-07-27)