Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Black Shark 3 – Potência de jogos com efeitos de LED

Name: Xiaomi Black Shark 3
Brand: Xiaomi

Jogos acessíveis? O Xiaomi Black Shark 3 mais uma vez oferece uma experiência de jogo barata e um exterior incomum. Embora falte alguns recursos em comparação com o modelo Pro, é mais barato e mais compacto em troca. Vamos ver se a Xiaomi conseguiu criar algo que será capaz de satisfazer a comunidade de gamers.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/24/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android ARM Smartphone Gaming

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Black Shark Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 8 x 2.4 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 650

Memória

8192 MB

Pantalha

6.67 polegadas 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim, HDR, 90 Hz

Disco rígido

128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB

, 128 GB UFS, 108 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41), 5G (n78) , Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 10.4 x 168.7 x 77.3

Bateria

4720 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Qualcomm Quick Charge 4+ até 65 watts

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Sistema Operativo

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix f/1.8, phase detection AF, LED flash, videos @2160p/60FPS (câmera 1); 13.0MP, f/2.25, lente grande ângular (câmera 2); 5.0MP, f/2.2, depth of field (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.2, Videos @1080p/30FPS

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo (híbridos), Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador rápido, cabo USB, SIM tool, protetor de silicone, 24 Meses Garantia, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS; LED de notificações (back/multi-colored); , fanless

peso

222 g, Suprimento de energia: 82 g

Preço

599 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Competing Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
85 %	07/2020	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 SD 865, Adreno 650	222 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
87 %	04/2019	Xiaomi Black Shark 2 SD 855, Adreno 640	205 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.39"	2340x1080
85 %	06/2020	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650	253 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	7.10"	3120x1440
88 %	06/2020	OnePlus 8 SD 865, Adreno 650	180 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
84 %		Nubia RedMagic 5G SD 865, Adreno 650	218 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.65"	2340x1080
88 %	04/2020	Samsung Galaxy S20+ Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11	188 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.70"	3200x1440

Os Top 10

» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros

Size Comparison

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Nubia RedMagic 5G Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Samsung Galaxy S20+ OnePlus 8 ❌

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nubia RedMagic 5G Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	946 (911^min - 960^max) MBit/s ∼100% +39%
OnePlus 8 Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	894 (864^min - 925^max) MBit/s ∼95% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	835 (808^min - 847^max) MBit/s ∼88% +23%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	817 (785^min - 843^max) MBit/s ∼86% +20%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	679 (601^min - 733^max) MBit/s ∼72%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	586 (267^min - 693^max) MBit/s ∼62% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1414, n=641)	290 MBit/s ∼31% -57%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 8 Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	937 (466^min - 960^max) MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	926 (463^min - 960^max) MBit/s ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	923 (783^min - 956^max) MBit/s ∼99%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	876 (785^min - 909^max) MBit/s ∼93% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	863 (759^min - 898^max) MBit/s ∼92% -7%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	527 (410^min - 577^max) MBit/s ∼56% -43%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 1599, n=641)	276 MBit/s ∼29% -70%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø678 (601-733)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø923 (783-956)

Locating Xiaomi Black Shark 3 - overview

Locating Xiaomi Black Shark 3 - roundabout

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Xiaomi Black Shark 3

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

click to load images

Xiaomi Black Shark 3

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

click to load images

Xiaomi Black Shark 3

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8 Pro

Canon 600D

ColorChecker Xiaomi Black Shark 3: 26.71 ∆E min: 12.23 - max: 38.84 ∆E

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.info/Breve-Analise-do-Smartphone-Xiaomi-Black-Shark-3-Potencia-de-jogos-com-efeitos-de-LED.482794.0.html">Xiaomi Black Shark 3</a> — Xiaomi Black Shark 3


583 cd/m²	618 cd/m²	648 cd/m²
582 cd/m²	619 cd/m²	648 cd/m²
583 cd/m²	609 cd/m²	650 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 650 cd/m² Médio: 615.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.34 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 619 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.74 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.188

	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67	Xiaomi Black Shark 2 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 7.10	OnePlus 8 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55	Nubia RedMagic 5G OLED, 2340x1080, 6.65	Samsung Galaxy S20+ AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.70
Screen		-49%	-37%	35%	-91%	22%
Brightness middle	619	409 -34%	570 -8%	778 26%	593 -4%	740 20%
Brightness	616	412 -33%	589 -4%	783 27%	601 -2%	747 21%
Brightness Distribution	90	95 6%	90 0%	95 6%	92 2%	94 4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	3.74	5.2 -39%	4.65 -24%	0.9 76%	8.1 -117%	2.6 30%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	7.94	8.9 -12%	7.61 4%	2.2 72%	16.2 -104%	4.57 42%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	1.7	4.8 -182%	4.9 -188%	1.7 -0%	7.1 -318%	1.5 12%
Gamma	2.188 ^101%	2.21 ^100%	2.205 ^100%	2.25 ^98%	2.28 ^96%	2.269 ^97%
CCT	6662 ^98%	7430 ^87%	7500 ^87%	6481 ^100%	7566 ^86%	6284 ^103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

227.3 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 227.3 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 227.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).

Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3310 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2896 - 3310, n=13)	3153 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (255 - 7400, n=67)	1894 Points ∼57% -43%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3382 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2634 - 3665, n=13)	3077 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (72 - 6252, n=70)	1659 Points ∼49% -51%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3449 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3361 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3427 Points ∼99% -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3076 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	2899 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (2687 - 3449, n=21)	3273 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (248 - 4201, n=171)	1932 Points ∼56% -44%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	924 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	903 Points ∼96% -2%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	919 Points ∼97% -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	909 Points ∼96% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	944 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (764 - 924, n=21)	903 Points ∼96% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (63 - 1604, n=171)	558 Points ∼59% -40%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9822 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	8342 Points ∼65% -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10945 Points ∼85% +11%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10800 Points ∼84% +10%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12879 Points ∼100% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	10583 Points ∼82% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (9202 - 15299, n=22)	11268 Points ∼87% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=568)	6082 Points ∼47% -38%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12612 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	10330 Points ∼70% -18%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11839 Points ∼80% -6%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13079 Points ∼89% +4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	13954 Points ∼95% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	14760 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10990 - 19989, n=21)	13586 Points ∼92% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19989, n=717)	6703 Points ∼45% -47%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5780 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4535 Points ∼78% -22%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5401 Points ∼93% -7%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5532 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4495 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4957 - 5780, n=20)	5344 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 5780, n=576)	2290 Points ∼40% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9157 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7108 Points ∼74% -22%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9542 Points ∼100% +4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9467 Points ∼99% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	9190 Points ∼96% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8633 - 9567, n=20)	9380 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 12146, n=576)	2288 Points ∼24% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8105 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6312 Points ∼77% -22%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8153 Points ∼100% +1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8154 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	7459 Points ∼91% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (7517 - 8269, n=21)	8030 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 9643, n=577)	2113 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5765 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4462 Points ∼77% -23%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5406 Points ∼94% -6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5532 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4455 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3956 - 5765, n=20)	5110 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 5765, n=607)	2208 Points ∼38% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12843 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	10300 Points ∼80% -20%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12873 Points ∼100% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12750 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	9471 Points ∼74% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11956 - 13044, n=20)	12723 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 22052, n=607)	3140 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	10090 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7980 Points ∼79% -21%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9850 Points ∼98% -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9877 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	7576 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8499 - 10090, n=20)	9540 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (88 - 11895, n=607)	2578 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5209 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4262 Points ∼82% -18%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4879 Points ∼94% -6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5209 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4180 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (4582 - 5209, n=20)	4941 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 5318, n=656)	2165 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8284 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6362 Points ∼75% -23%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8288 Points ∼98% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8432 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8469 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (6500 - 9167, n=20)	8128 Points ∼96% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 11573, n=656)	1906 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7323 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5734 Points ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7174 Points ∼98% -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7305 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6896 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5996 - 7653, n=21)	7103 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 9138, n=657)	1809 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5274 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4240 Points ∼80% -20%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4819 Points ∼91% -9%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5049 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4124 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (3965 - 5274, n=20)	4844 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 5301, n=698)	2038 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11557 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	9983 Points ∼80% -14%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11540 Points ∼92% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12494 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6392 Points ∼51% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (10599 - 13305, n=20)	11750 Points ∼94% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 16670, n=697)	2545 Points ∼20% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9138 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7673 Points ∼81% -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8810 Points ∼93% -4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9492 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	5696 Points ∼60% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8215 - 9611, n=20)	8915 Points ∼94% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 11256, n=700)	2173 Points ∼23% -76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	58293 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	45072 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	57583 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	27026 Points ∼46% -54%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	26182 Points ∼45% -55%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	27431 Points ∼47% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (17817 - 58293, n=19)	34885 Points ∼60% -40%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 59268, n=842)	15957 Points ∼27% -73%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	154375 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	110432 Points ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	149468 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	144611 Points ∼94% -6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	150654 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	48476 Points ∼31% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (110875 - 154375, n=19)	145987 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 224130, n=840)	29153 Points ∼19% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	112989 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	83518 Points ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	110468 Points ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	72524 Points ∼64% -36%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	73143 Points ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	41415 Points ∼37% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (56045 - 112989, n=19)	83547 Points ∼74% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 117606, n=840)	22274 Points ∼20% -80%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	206 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	167 fps ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	203 fps ∼98% -1%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	207 fps ∼100% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	206 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	199 fps ∼96% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (168 - 209, n=21)	203 fps ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=835)	48.7 fps ∼24% -76%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	60 fps ∼67%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps ∼67% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	90 fps ∼100% +50%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps ∼67% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	90 fps ∼100% +50%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	60 fps ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 138, n=21)	76.9 fps ∼85% +28%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 142, n=844)	32.5 fps ∼36% -46%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	120 fps ∼95%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	102 fps ∼81% -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	122 fps ∼97% +2%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	125 fps ∼99% +4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	126 fps ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	126 fps ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (96 - 130, n=21)	122 fps ∼97% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 180, n=740)	28.9 fps ∼23% -76%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	60 fps ∼68%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps ∼68% 0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	68 fps ∼77% +13%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps ∼68% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	88 fps ∼100% +47%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	60 fps ∼68% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (50 - 111, n=21)	72.9 fps ∼83% +22%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 117, n=748)	23.8 fps ∼27% -60%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	82 fps ∼93%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	71 fps ∼81% -13%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	86 fps ∼98% +5%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	88 fps ∼100% +7%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	74 fps ∼84% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	85 fps ∼97% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (67 - 90, n=22)	85.1 fps ∼97% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=603)	23.1 fps ∼26% -72%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	60 fps ∼99%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	57 fps ∼94% -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	43 fps ∼71% -28%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	60 fps ∼99% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps ∼84% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	59 fps ∼97% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (43 - 83, n=22)	60.8 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=605)	20.6 fps ∼34% -66%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	30 fps ∼91%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	25 fps ∼76% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	27 fps ∼82% -10%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	31 fps ∼94% +3%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	28 fps ∼85% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	33 fps ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (18 - 32, n=23)	27.7 fps ∼84% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=367)	11.8 fps ∼36% -61%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	20 fps ∼91%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	17 fps ∼77% -15%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps ∼91% 0%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps ∼91% 0%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps ∼91% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	22 fps ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (20 - 21, n=23)	20.2 fps ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 101, n=365)	8.21 fps ∼37% -59%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	45 fps ∼85%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	38 fps ∼72% -16%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	53 fps ∼100% +18%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	48 fps ∼91% +7%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	44 fps ∼83% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	52 fps ∼98% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (28 - 53, n=23)	43.2 fps ∼82% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=371)	17.6 fps ∼33% -61%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	52 fps ∼90%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	43 fps ∼74% -17%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	27 fps ∼47% -48%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	54 fps ∼93% +4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	54 fps ∼93% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	58 fps ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (27 - 56, n=23)	52 fps ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 257, n=371)	20.1 fps ∼35% -61%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	49 fps ∼94%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	42 fps ∼81% -14%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps ∼98% +4%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	52 fps ∼100% +6%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps ∼98% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	51 fps ∼98% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (39 - 54, n=22)	50.5 fps ∼97% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 75, n=528)	15.4 fps ∼30% -69%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	41 fps ∼89%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	36 fps ∼78% -12%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	25 fps ∼54% -39%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	46 fps ∼100% +12%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	42 fps ∼91% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	45 fps ∼98% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (25 - 48, n=22)	40.5 fps ∼88% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=532)	13.6 fps ∼30% -67%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	574589 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	572807 Points ∼94% 0%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	563466 Points ∼93% -2%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	607937 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	296746 Points ∼49% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (527301 - 607937, n=22)	578062 Points ∼95% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (53335 - 624727, n=153)	324151 Points ∼53% -44%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	1395 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	1264 Points ∼84% -9%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1429 Points ∼95% +2%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1498 Points ∼100% +7%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1505 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	1378 Points ∼92% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1276 - 2169, n=21)	1504 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 2169, n=765)	843 Points ∼56% -40%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11747 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	8125 Points ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11445 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11654 Points ∼99% -1%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11648 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	10803 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (11399 - 12073, n=21)	11701 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=765)	2614 Points ∼22% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5564 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3560 Points ∼42% -36%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5688 Points ∼68% +2%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6912 Points ∼82% +24%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8398 Points ∼100% +51%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3775 Points ∼45% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5304 - 8874, n=21)	7103 Points ∼85% +28%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 8874, n=765)	1977 Points ∼24% -64%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8421 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5993 Points ∼60% -29%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8622 Points ∼86% +2%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10021 Points ∼100% +19%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9723 Points ∼97% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	9281 Points ∼93% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (8421 - 10147, n=21)	9721 Points ∼97% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=765)	3587 Points ∼36% -57%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5264 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3847 Points ∼63% -27%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5302 Points ∼86% +1%
OnePlus 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5897 Points ∼96% +12%
Nubia RedMagic 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6149 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4779 Points ∼78% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (5264 - 6402, n=21)	5885 Points ∼96% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6402, n=765)	1844 Points ∼30% -65%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)	66.292 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (45.2 - 77, n=19)	63.5 Points ∼96% -4%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)	61.492 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)	53.053 Points ∼80% -20%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	51.341 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)	50.566 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	45.538 Points ∼69% -31%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 161, n=227)	42.9 Points ∼65% -35%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)	117.37 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (74.2 - 126, n=19)	111 Points ∼95% -5%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)	103.45 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)	89.329 Points ∼76% -24%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	79.083 Points ∼67% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=660)	50.4 Points ∼43% -57%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chome 83)	70.9 runs/min ∼100%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)	67.7 runs/min ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (30.6 - 74.5, n=18)	63.8 runs/min ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chome 80)	62.8 runs/min ∼89% -11%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)	59.6 runs/min ∼84% -16%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	50.8 runs/min ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	46.7 runs/min ∼66% -34%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 196, n=206)	45.1 runs/min ∼64% -36%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (97 - 127, n=21)	106 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)	104 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)	101 Points ∼95% -3%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	99 Points ∼93% -5%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)	99 Points ∼93% -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	94 Points ∼89% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)	86 Points ∼81% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=298)	71 Points ∼67% -32%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (14606 - 24467, n=21)	22024 Points ∼100% +39%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)	21048 Points ∼96% +32%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)	20976 Points ∼95% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)	18094 Points ∼82% +14%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	17011 Points ∼77% +7%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)	15901 Points ∼72%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	15745 Points ∼71% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=830)	8415 Points ∼38% -47%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=856)	9483 ms * ∼100% -293%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)	2538.1 ms * ∼27% -5%
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 (Chrome 73.0.3683.90)	2528.6 ms * ∼27% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)	2488.3 ms * ∼26% -3%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Chrome 83)	2410.7 ms * ∼25%
Nubia RedMagic 5G (Chrome 83)	2401.34 ms * ∼25% -0%
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro (Chrome 83)	2061.3 ms * ∼22% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (1839 - 2911, n=22)	2054 ms * ∼22% +15%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Black Shark 3	Xiaomi Black Shark 2	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro	OnePlus 8	Nubia RedMagic 5G	Samsung Galaxy S20+	Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-63%	-3%	-3%	-19%	-5%	-18%	-79%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard						57.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	55.7 (30.7 - 66.4, n=8)	51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard						66.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	67.3 (34.6 - 81.6, n=8)	69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564)
Random Write 4KB	227.8	25 -89%	261.45 15%	203.85 -11%	193.57 -15%	229.8 1%	185 (29.9 - 230, n=11) -19%	40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935) -82%
Random Read 4KB	238.3	145.18 -39%	218.2 -8%	215 -10%	201.64 -15%	199.6 -16%	198 (170 - 238, n=11) -17%	63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935) -74%
Sequential Write 256KB	679.6	195.65 -71%	657.92 -3%	747.87 10%	388.38 -43%	694.3 2%	514 (213 - 697, n=11) -24%	139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935) -80%
Sequential Read 256KB	1692.2	792.81 -53%	1398.36 -17%	1706.7 1%	1654.41 -2%	1603.1 -5%	1521 (1406 - 1692, n=11) -10%	363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935) -79%

; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.19.0: Ø59.9 (59-61)

; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.19.0: Ø60 (59-61)

; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.3.4a: Ø29.1 (25-31)

; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.3.4a: Ø29.5 (24-31)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


39.5 °C	40.6 °C	40.9 °C
39.8 °C	41.8 °C	41.6 °C
39.7 °C	40.2 °C	41.1 °C

Máximo: 41.8 °C
Médio: 40.6 °C


37.2 °C	39.7 °C	37.4 °C
37.4 °C	40.6 °C	37.4 °C
39.1 °C	41.2 °C	38.7 °C

Máximo: 41.2 °C
Médio: 38.7 °C

alimentação elétrica 37.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Nubia RedMagic 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0 / 0.2 Watt
Ocioso	1.2 / 2.1 / 2.5 Watt
Carga	6.3 / 10.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 4720 mAh	Xiaomi Black Shark 2 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro 5000 mAh	OnePlus 8 4300 mAh	Nubia RedMagic 5G 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S20+ 4500 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		41%	-18%	19%	19%	8%	8%	28%
Idle Minimum *	1.2	0.73 39%	1.5 -25%	0.9 25%	1.1 8%	1 17%	1.134 (0.52 - 2.2, n=20) 5%	0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=927) 26%
Idle Average *	2.1	1.01 52%	2.3 -10%	2.3 -10%	1.5 29%	1.7 19%	2.07 (1.19 - 3.43, n=20) 1%	1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=926) 16%
Idle Maximum *	2.5	1.13 55%	3.1 -24%	2.33 7%	1.71 32%	2.3 8%	2.3 (1.23 - 4, n=20) 8%	2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=927) 18%
Load Average *	6.3	3.64 42%	7.4 -17%	3.5 44%	4.84 23%	5.8 8%	5.24 (3.5 - 7.4, n=20) 17%	4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=921) 35%
Load Maximum *	10.7	8.86 17%	12.3 -15%	7.68 28%	10.42 3%	11.8 -10%	9.73 (7.67 - 12.3, n=20) 9%	6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=921) 43%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		24h 47min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		11h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14h 59min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 26min

	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 4720 mAh	Xiaomi Black Shark 2 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro 5000 mAh	OnePlus 8 4300 mAh	Nubia RedMagic 5G 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S20+ 4500 mAh
Battery Runtime		-2%	11%	11%	-21%	16%
Reader / Idle	1487	952 -36%	1589 7%	1374 -8%		2041 37%
H.264	899	666 -26%	972 8%	1096 22%		978 9%
WiFi v1.3	703	774 10%	767 9%	1045 49%	614 -13%	794 13%
Load	206	295 43%	247 20%	168 -18%	149 -28%	218 6%

Pro

+ Bom valor

+ Tela fluente de 90-Hz

+ Desempenho veloz

+ Efeitos de iluminação extravagantes na à parte traseira

+ Sem afogamento no uso intenso prolongado

+ Ampla variedade de acessórios disponível

+ A câmera capturas boas fotos

+ Navegação confiável

+ Wi-Fi rápido

Contra

- Sem NFC

- Sem carregamento sem fio

- Sem certificação IP

- 90 Hz não disponível em muitos jogos

- Duração de bateria bastante curta

Veredicto – Muito desempenho...mas não por muito

O Xiaomi Black Shark 3 tem muitos recursos que os jogadores esperam: Um design extraordinário, porém bem pensado, desempenho extremamente rápido, armazenamento interno rápido, uma solução de refrigeração confiável e uma boa tela.

No entanto, o dispositivo não está livre de falhas e a duração da bateria poderia ter sido maior em sessões de jogos mais longas, o alto índice de atualização da tela nos jogos não é tão abrangente quanto gostaríamos e os alto-falantes têm espaço para melhorias também. Dito isto, alguns compromissos são inevitáveis, uma vez que o Black Shark 3 dá aos usuários acesso ao mundo dos jogos por apenas 599 Euros (~ US$ 685). Isso também inclui a falta de certificação IP, carregamento sem fio e NFC. O último é particularmente surpreendente, uma vez que os pagamentos móveis estão se tornando cada vez mais importantes.

Comparado ao modelo Pro, não há botões nas esquinas dedicados, no entanto, existem muitos acessórios para jogos, alguns dos quais são incrivelmente convenientes.

O Black Shark 3 está muito rápido, mas sua duração da bateria é apenas média.

Em suma, o Black Shark 3 é uma alternativa barata para todos aqueles que procuram principalmente alto desempenho nos jogos. Para quem não gosta de design, ainda é um smartphone relativamente acessível, porém poderoso, com uma tela de 90 Hz. De qualquer forma, a duração da bateria não deve ser uma prioridade.

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 - 2020-07-2007/20/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

84%

Teclado

68 / 75 → 90%

Mouse

94%

Conectividade

50 / 70 → 71%

Peso

88%

Bateria

89%

Pantalha

86%

Desempenho do jogos

62 / 64 → 97%

Desempenho da aplicação

80 / 86 → 93%

Temperatura

88%

Ruído

100%

Audio

68 / 90 → 76%

Camera

71%

Médio

79%

85%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Linked Articles

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 (Black Shark Serie)

Análise

•

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xi...

Análise

•

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xi...

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Black Shark 3 – Potência de jogos com efeitos de LED

Competing Devices

Os Top 10

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Black Shark 3 audio analysis

Nubia RedMagic 5G audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto – Muito desempenho...mas não por muito

Linked Articles

Pricecompare