Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Conversível Dell Inspiron 15 5568

Nino Ricchizzi (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/28/2016

Fusão. Com um conversível de 15-polegadas, a Dell tenta combinar as qualidades mais importantes de um portátil e tablet em seu novo Inspiron. No entanto, alguns compromissos devem ser feitos para atingir esta meta alta

Dell Inspiron 15 5568 (Inspiron 15 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-6500U, TDP: 15 W, 2 núcleos
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 300 MHz, 20.19.15.4390
Memória
16384 MB 
, 2x8 GB DDR4 (2 de 2 slots ocupados), dual-channel
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, multitouch capacitiva, AU Optronics B156HW01 V0, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8, 256 GB 
, 2,5-polegadas, SATA 3.2
Placa de Som
Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: combo áudio, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20 x 382 x 253
Bateria
42 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.072 kg, Suprimento de energia: 284 g
Preço
1000 Euro

 

The new Inspiron in tablet mode
Somewhat stable hinges...
...prevent opening the convertible...
...with one hand.
Quality build
Cleaning the fan is possible
It is not easy to...
...remove the base plate.
Both working memory slots are filled.
Elegant looks
The Inspiron in notebook mode
Inspiron 5568 rear view
The logo adorns the touchscreen's panel

Size Comparison

Left: Power-in, HDMI-out, 2x USB 3.0, combo audio
Left: Power-in, HDMI-out, 2x USB 3.0, combo audio
Right: SD card reader, 1x USB 3.0, Elegant security preparation
Right: SD card reader, 1x USB 3.0, Elegant security preparation
Rear
Rear
Front
Front
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)
Iris Graphics 540, 6560U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
135 MB/s ∼100% +543%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Radeon R7 M460, 6200U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
74.2 MB/s ∼55% +253%
HP Envy 15-w103ng x360
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
68.4 MB/s ∼51% +226%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
21 MB/s ∼16%
Acer Aspire R14 R5-471T-79GQ
HD Graphics 520, 6500U
17 MB/s ∼13% -19%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ISK 80NT005WGE
Radeon R7 M360, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
14 MB/s ∼10% -33%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)
Iris Graphics 540, 6560U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D
210 MB/s ∼100% +692%
HP Envy 15-w103ng x360
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
88 MB/s ∼42% +232%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Radeon R7 M460, 6200U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
85.11 MB/s ∼41% +221%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
26.5 MB/s ∼13%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ISK 80NT005WGE
Radeon R7 M360, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
25.9 MB/s ∼12% -2%
Acer Aspire R14 R5-471T-79GQ
HD Graphics 520, 6500U
25.2 MB/s ∼12% -5%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
372 MBit/s ∼100%
HP x2 210 G1
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash
80 MBit/s ∼22% -78%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
390 MBit/s ∼100%
HP x2 210 G1
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash
71 MBit/s ∼18% -82%
241
cd/m²
232
cd/m²
229
cd/m²
268
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
241
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 268 cd/m² Médio: 249.3 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 266 cd/m²
Contraste: 1023:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.98 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.68 | - Ø
57% sRGB (Argyll) 36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.27
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
HP Envy 15-w103ng x360
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Radeon R7 M460, 6200U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
Acer Aspire R14 R5-471T-79GQ
HD Graphics 520, 6500U
Response Times
-3%
-8%
-22%
-63%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 (19, 23)
32.8 (14.8, 18)
22%
37 (38, 36)
12%
43.2 (19.6, 23.6)
-3%
80 (24, 56)
-90%
Response Time Black / White *
22 (6, 16)
28 (4.8, 23.2)
-27%
28 (24, 32)
-27%
30.8 (17.6, 13.2)
-40%
30 (9, 31)
-36%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-2%
-31%
3%
-8%
Brightness
249
295
18%
205
-18%
230
-8%
203
-18%
Brightness Distribution
85
88
4%
80
-6%
86
1%
85
0%
Black Level *
0.26
0.57
-119%
0.26
-0%
0.26
-0%
0.25
4%
Contrast
1023
523
-49%
800
-22%
977
-4%
860
-16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.98
4.43
11%
6.97
-40%
4.23
15%
5.04
-1%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.68
2.45
9%
7.37
-175%
2.87
-7%
3.3
-23%
Gamma
2.27 106%
2.45 98%
2.34 103%
2.35 102%
2.35 102%
CCT
6583 99%
6326 103%
6823 95%
5965 109%
6370 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36
57.2
59%
38
6%
40.35
12%
35
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
57
87.8
54%
59
4%
63.48
11%
55
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-3% / -2%
-20% / -27%
-10% / -2%
-36% / -19%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ISK 80NT005WGE
Radeon R7 M360, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
130 Points ∼100% +2%
Acer Aspire R14 R5-471T-79GQ
HD Graphics 520, 6500U
128 Points ∼98% 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
128 Points ∼98%
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
123 Points ∼95% -4%
HP Envy 15-w103ng x360
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
116 Points ∼89% -9%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Radeon R7 M460, 6200U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
114 Points ∼88% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ISK 80NT005WGE
Radeon R7 M360, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
322 Points ∼100% +5%
Acer Aspire R14 R5-471T-79GQ
HD Graphics 520, 6500U
320 Points ∼99% +4%
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
310 Points ∼96% +1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
308 Points ∼96%
HP Envy 15-w103ng x360
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
292 Points ∼91% -5%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Radeon R7 M460, 6200U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
289 Points ∼90% -6%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
128 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
308 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
41.34 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Ajuda
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Radeon R7 M460, 6200U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
3651 Points ∼61% +1%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
3607 Points ∼60%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ISK 80NT005WGE
Radeon R7 M360, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
3486 Points ∼58% -3%
Acer Aspire R14 R5-471T-79GQ
HD Graphics 520, 6500U
3392 Points ∼57% -6%
HP Envy 15-w103ng x360
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
3200 Points ∼54% -11%
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
2847 Points ∼48% -21%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3607 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4433 pontos
Ajuda
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
HP Envy 15-w103ng x360
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
Acer Aspire R14 R5-471T-79GQ
HD Graphics 520, 6500U
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Radeon R7 M460, 6200U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
14%
13%
-9%
18%
Write 4k QD32
197.6
138.7
-30%
239
21%
161.6
-18%
232
17%
Read 4k QD32
275.3
281.2
2%
367.9
34%
278.5
1%
281.5
2%
Write 4k
86.67
93
7%
95.15
10%
81.62
-6%
63.65
-27%
Read 4k
19.88
35.48
78%
27.64
39%
26.04
31%
27.05
36%
Write 512
242
318.9
32%
240
-1%
161.5
-33%
356.3
47%
Read 512
397.4
258.4
-35%
391.3
-2%
319.7
-20%
384.5
-3%
Write Seq
270
425
57%
240.7
-11%
161.6
-40%
450.7
67%
Read Seq
458.6
475.6
4%
514.8
12%
502.8
10%
487
6%
Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
Sequential Read: 458.6 MB/s
Sequential Write: 270 MB/s
512K Read: 397.4 MB/s
512K Write: 242 MB/s
4K Read: 19.88 MB/s
4K Write: 86.67 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 275.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 197.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ISK 80NT005WGE
Radeon R7 M360, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
2301 Points ∼8% +38%
HP Envy 15-w103ng x360
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
2270 Points ∼8% +36%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Radeon R7 M460, 6200U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
2246 Points ∼8% +34%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
1672 Points ∼6%
Acer Aspire R14 R5-471T-79GQ
HD Graphics 520, 6500U
1584 Points ∼6% -5%
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
1565 Points ∼5% -6%
3DMark 11 Performance
1672 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6323 pontos
Ajuda
Tomb Raider
1366x768 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x
HP Envy 15-w103ng x360
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
33.4 fps ∼100% +20%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ISK 80NT005WGE
Radeon R7 M360, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
31.5 fps ∼94% +13%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Radeon R7 M460, 6200U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
30 fps ∼90% +8%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
27.9 fps ∼84%
Asus ASUSPRO P2530UA-DM0046E
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB
25.6 fps ∼77% -8%
Acer Aspire R14 R5-471T-79GQ
HD Graphics 520, 6500U
25.2 fps ∼75% -10%
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
23.4 fps ∼70% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Liteonit LCH-512V2S
18.6 fps ∼56% -33%
1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX AF:4x
HP Envy 15-w103ng x360
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
58 fps ∼100% +36%
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
42.7 fps ∼74%
Lenovo Ideapad 500-15ISK 80NT005WGE
Radeon R7 M360, 6500U, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
42.3 fps ∼73% -1%
Acer Aspire R14 R5-471T-79GQ
HD Graphics 520, 6500U
41.7 fps ∼72% -2%
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Radeon R7 M460, 6200U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
39.9 fps ∼69% -7%
Asus ASUSPRO P2530UA-DM0046E
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB
38.2 fps ∼66% -11%
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
33.8 fps ∼58% -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X260-20F6007RGE
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Liteonit LCH-512V2S
28.1 fps ∼48% -34%
baixo média alto ultra
Tomb Raider (2013) 84.142.727.912.6fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 54.431.527.78.2fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 17.610.86.2fps

Barulho

Ocioso
32.8 / 32.8 / 33.8 dB
Carga
36.3 / 36.3 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 31.2 dB(A)
Carga Máxima
 36.7 °C37.2 °C29.2 °C 
 37.2 °C36.9 °C26.4 °C 
 24.2 °C25.2 °C25.2 °C 
Máximo: 37.2 °C
Médio: 30.9 °C
28.2 °C43.7 °C50.6 °C
24.8 °C40.3 °C45.6 °C
24.7 °C25 °C26 °C
Máximo: 50.6 °C
Médio: 34.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  50.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.345.240.841.143.32537.84041.636.537.83135.838.942.635.735.84035.338.642.833.135.35035.440.142.935.435.46339.641.743.73539.68036.84245.430.836.810037.242.646.731.637.212537.642.547.228.537.616039.744.349.128.239.720042.548.851.727.842.52504752.756.325.64731551.356.360.725.851.340050.755.860.823.850.750050.356.560.823.250.36305863.968.922.75880063.869.773.821.963.8100061.867.671.321.361.8125059.666.169.720.959.6160061.367.771.920.361.3200061.167.171.62061.1250054.46266.319.554.4315053.360.164.519.853.3400059.265.67019.759.2500054.36366.919.754.3630055.356.861.519.555.380005755.459.719.4571000053.154.758.619.253.11250048.855.659.71948.81600050.35963.619.150.3SPL70.776.780.93370.7N26.837.548.4226.8median 53.3Dell Inspiron 15 5568median 56.8median 61.5median 20.9median 53.3Delta55.35.72.5535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.26 / 0.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.34 / 7.5 / 8.4 Watt
Carga midlight 30.4 / 32.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
HP Envy 15-w103ng x360
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Radeon R7 M460, 6200U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
Acer Aspire R14 R5-471T-79GQ
HD Graphics 520, 6500U
Power Consumption
-45%
-13%
-20%
4%
Idle Minimum *
4.34
6.5
-50%
4.15
4%
4
8%
4
8%
Idle Average *
7.5
13.3
-77%
8.2
-9%
7.5
-0%
6.6
12%
Idle Maximum *
8.4
15.1
-80%
8.2
2%
8.1
4%
8.6
-2%
Load Average *
30.4
30.8
-1%
34.6
-14%
40.8
-34%
30.5
-0%
Load Maximum *
32.5
38.5
-18%
48
-48%
57.3
-76%
32.2
1%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
7h 29min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
4h 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 58min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 33min
Dell Inspiron 15 5568
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Toshiba THNSNK256GCS8
HP Spectre x360 15-ap012dx
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Sandisk X300 SD7SN6S-256G-1006
HP Envy 15-w103ng x360
GeForce 930M, 6200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
Acer Aspire R14 R5-471T-79GQ
HD Graphics 520, 6500U
Lenovo Yoga 510-15ISK
Radeon R7 M460, 6200U, Liteonit CV3-DE256
Battery Runtime
41%
33%
50%
24%
Reader / Idle
449
705
57%
730
63%
H.264
298
337
13%
WiFi v1.3
299
431
44%
398
33%
448
50%
335
12%
Load
93
113
22%
100
8%

Pro

+ Tempos de resposta rápidos
+ Nível de ruído baixo
+ Touchpad grande
+ Construção sólida

Contra

- Tela moderadamente brilhante
- Curta duração da bateria
- Apenas 12 meses de garantia
In review: Dell Inspiron 5568. Test model provided by Dell Deutschland.
In review: Dell Inspiron 5568. Test model provided by Dell Deutschland.

Para cumprir com os requisitos de um conversível, o aparelho deve ser equipado com um bom equilíbrio de desempenho, alta-qualidade de construção e mobilidade. Além de algumas exceções, a Dell consegue isso em seu novo Inspiron 15 5568. A carcaça consegue se destacar entre a concorrência exceto por algumas fraquezas. Achamos a boa qualidade particularmente positiva. Apenas a traseira da tela deve ser mais robusta, e o peso e sua distribuição deve melhorar no futuro. Não temos muitas críticas para a tela; no entanto um brilho um pouco mais alto seria bem-vindo. O seguinte critério importante é a prontidão do desempenho e tempos de resposta em particular. Dado que a Dell instalou exclusivamente hardware de alto desempenho, nosso modelo de teste poderia exibir suas fortalezas nos benchmarks dos sistemas. No entanto, isto tem um impacto na temperatura. O calor é bastante pronunciado em um lado, e por isso o Inspiron esquenta muito em um lugar durante uso intenso permanente. Além disso, a duração da bateria é um pouco curta, a qual é consideravelmente mais longa em alguns oponentes.

Os usuários procurando um conversível elegante, versátil e sempre pronto em um tamanho de 15 polegadas encontrarão isto na nova série Inspiron 5000 da Dell.

Os compradores que não estiverem dispostos a gastar 1000 Euros (~$1099) também podem dar uma olhada na alternativa de 200 Euros (~$220) a menos desta linha. A concorrência não deve ser deixada de lado. Um exemplo a ser mencionado é, mais uma vez o HP Spectre x360 que representa uma opção interessante com uma tela mais brilhante, duração mais longa da bateria, e peso geral inferior.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Dell Inspiron 15 5568 - 07/19/2016 v5.1
Nino Ricchizzi

Acabamento
84 / 98 → 86%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
84%
Conectividade
43 / 80 → 54%
Peso
63 / 78 → 65%
Bateria
80%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
57 / 68 → 84%
Desempenho da aplicação
87 / 87 → 100%
Temperatura
87%
Ruído
91%
Audio
62 / 91 → 68%
Camera
47 / 85 → 56%
Médio
73%
79%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Dell Inspiron 15 5568
Nino Ricchizzi, 2016-07-28 (Update: 2016-07-31)