Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Conversível HP Pavilion x360 (Core i3-8130U, SSD de 256 GB)

Nino Richizzi, T: Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/10/2019

Bad development. A HP atualiza o conversível Pavilion x360 com uma CPU Intel Core i3 por 700 euros (~$797). O fabricante quer agitar o mercado de conversíveis com essa estratégia. Vemos algum potencial, mas existem algumas desvantagens importantes.

HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng (Pavilion x360 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i3-8130U
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 23.20.16.4973
Memória
8192 MB 
, Single-Channel, DDR4-2400
Pantalha
14 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, Tela capacitiva multi-touch, native pen support, Chi Mei CMN14D9, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, 256 GB 
, 211 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector estéreo combinado, Card Reader: SD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20 x 324 x 224
Bateria
41 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo B&O Play, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.636 kg, Suprimento de energia: 286 g
Preço
570 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

The HP Pavilion x360 is a versatile system…
The HP Pavilion x360 is a versatile system…
…thanks to the convertible design.
You can use it as a regular notebook…
…or as a tablet.
The manufacturer implements…
…a 360-degree hinge.
The noble design leaves a solid first impression.
However, only the…
…base unit is made of metal.
All other chassis components…
…are made of plastic.

Size Comparison

334.95 mm 229.95 mm 20.8 mm 1.7 kg334.8 mm 226.9 mm 19.9 mm 1.7 kg328 mm 229 mm 19.9 mm 1.7 kg327.4 mm 226.5 mm 19 mm 1.6 kg324 mm 224 mm 20 mm 1.6 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81 MB/s ∼100% +19%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79.6 MB/s ∼98% +17%
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
68.2 MB/s ∼84%
Average of class Convertible
  (7.5 - 197, n=114)
59.5 MB/s ∼73% -13%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
24.5 MB/s ∼30% -64%
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
20.6 MB/s ∼25% -70%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88.8 MB/s ∼100% +7%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.9 MB/s ∼99% +6%
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83.2 MB/s ∼94%
Average of class Convertible
  (24 - 246, n=111)
75 MB/s ∼84% -10%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.6 MB/s ∼30% -68%
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
24.8 MB/s ∼28% -70%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
596 MBit/s ∼100% +120%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
526 MBit/s ∼88% +94%
Average of class Convertible
  (38.3 - 678, n=126)
486 MBit/s ∼82% +79%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
310 MBit/s ∼52% +14%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
290 MBit/s ∼49% +7%
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821
271 (min: 261, max: 290) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
665 MBit/s ∼100% +105%
Average of class Convertible
  (39.2 - 685, n=126)
493 MBit/s ∼74% +52%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
349 MBit/s ∼52% +7%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
335 MBit/s ∼50% +3%
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng
RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821
325 (min: 314, max: 340) MBit/s ∼49%
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
300 MBit/s ∼45% -8%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø271 (261-290)
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø325 (314-340)
198
cd/m²
196
cd/m²
208
cd/m²
203
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
194
cd/m²
167
cd/m²
199
cd/m²
162
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 225 cd/m² Médio: 194.7 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
iluminação: 72 %
iluminação com acumulador: 218 cd/m²
Contraste: 1607:1 (Preto: 0.14 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.44 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.98 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
62% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.32
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng
Chi Mei CMN14D9, , 1920x1080, 14
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Chi Mei, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
BOE NV140FHM-N49, , 1920x1080, 14
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
Chi Mei N140HCE-EN1, , 1920x1080, 14
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
BOE CQ NV140FHM-N41, , 1920x1080, 14
Response Times
320%
-35%
314%
-25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44 (24, 20)
41 (23, 18)
7%
47 (24, 23)
-7%
34 (19, 15)
23%
43 (21, 22)
2%
Response Time Black / White *
30 (17, 13)
22 (14, 10)
27%
34 (20, 14)
-13%
29 (18, 11)
3%
35 (21, 14)
-17%
PWM Frequency
2439 (30)
25000 (50)
925%
347 (90)
-86%
24750 (80)
915%
1000
-59%
Screen
-12%
8%
29%
10%
Brightness middle
225
252
12%
255
13%
327
45%
220
-2%
Brightness
195
237
22%
247
27%
308
58%
221
13%
Brightness Distribution
72
90
25%
83
15%
90
25%
78
8%
Black Level *
0.14
0.21
-50%
0.21
-50%
0.23
-64%
0.18
-29%
Contrast
1607
1200
-25%
1214
-24%
1422
-12%
1222
-24%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.44
7.29
-34%
4.5
17%
2.63
52%
3.98
27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
20.38
17.55
14%
7.21
65%
6.58
68%
7.69
62%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.98
7.48
-88%
2.96
26%
4.11
-3%
1.68
58%
Gamma
2.32 95%
2.45 90%
2.3 96%
2.45 90%
2.37 93%
CCT
6163 105%
6953 93%
6965 93%
7352 88%
6382 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
39
40
3%
38
-3%
63
62%
38
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
62
61
-2%
59
-5%
97
56%
58
-6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4
Total Average (Program / Settings)
154% / 64%
-14% / -2%
172% / 94%
-8% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (40.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2439 Hz ≤ 30 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2439 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2439 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9785 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng Intel Core i3-8130U, Intel Core i3-8130U: Ø318 (296.31-322.82)
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE Intel Core i5-7200U, Intel Core i5-7200U: Ø249 (247.44-262.24)
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T Intel Core i5-7200U, Intel Core i5-7200U: Ø329 (327.78-330.68)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
Intel Core i5-8250U
144 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Intel Core i3-8130U
  (139 - 140, n=2)
140 Points ∼97% +1%
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng
Intel Core i3-8130U
139 Points ∼97%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
127 Points ∼88% -9%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
Intel Core i5-7200U
127 Points ∼88% -9%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
124 Points ∼86% -11%
Average of class Convertible
  (19 - 177, n=282)
103 Points ∼72% -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
Intel Core i5-8250U
523 Points ∼100% +63%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
335 Points ∼64% +5%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
Intel Core i5-7200U
330 Points ∼63% +3%
Average Intel Core i3-8130U
  (320 - 338, n=2)
329 Points ∼63% +3%
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng
Intel Core i3-8130U
320 Points ∼61%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel Core i5-7200U
289 Points ∼55% -10%
Average of class Convertible
  (33 - 1064, n=289)
288 Points ∼55% -10%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
139 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
320 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
37.02 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
4596 Points ∼100% +4%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
4556 Points ∼99% +3%
Average Intel Core i3-8130U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4412 - 4534, n=2)
4473 Points ∼97% +1%
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng
UHD Graphics 620, 8130U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G
4412 Points ∼96%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4345 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Convertible
  (1007 - 5281, n=211)
3654 Points ∼80% -17%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3650 Points ∼100% +14%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
3455 Points ∼95% +8%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
GeForce 940MX, 7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP
3435 Points ∼94% +7%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3387 Points ∼93% +6%
Average Intel Core i3-8130U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3198 - 3302, n=2)
3250 Points ∼89% +2%
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng
UHD Graphics 620, 8130U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G
3198 Points ∼88%
Average of class Convertible
  (741 - 4741, n=257)
2748 Points ∼75% -14%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3198 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4412 pontos
Ajuda
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng
Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
Average Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G
 
AS SSD
13%
-23%
-10%
Copy Game MB/s
424.89
425.73
0%
231.88
-45%
457 (374 - 572, n=3)
8%
Copy Program MB/s
263.37
227.41
-14%
158.75
-40%
252 (219 - 275, n=3)
-4%
Copy ISO MB/s
574.32
578.97
1%
329.78
-43%
711 (574 - 983, n=3)
24%
Score Total
1511
1312
-13%
867
-43%
1341 (623 - 1634, n=4)
-11%
Score Write
392
662
69%
392
0%
330 (63 - 457, n=4)
-16%
Score Read
748
449
-40%
311
-58%
682 (388 - 800, n=4)
-9%
Access Time Write *
0.229
0.033
86%
0.056
76%
0.4265 (0.204 - 1.049, n=4)
-86%
Access Time Read *
0.138
0.092
33%
0.091
34%
0.1153 (0.085 - 0.138, n=4)
16%
4K-64 Write
224.89
495.36
120%
273.61
22%
197 (4.83 - 298, n=4)
-12%
4K-64 Read
584.1
279.34
-52%
236.07
-60%
512 (210 - 629, n=4)
-12%
4K Write
90.46
110.15
22%
77.87
-14%
65.7 (4.18 - 96.1, n=4)
-27%
4K Read
41.45
33.13
-20%
25.41
-39%
40.2 (37.7 - 42.1, n=4)
-3%
Seq Write
763.63
561.17
-27%
406.92
-47%
673 (544 - 764, n=4)
-12%
Seq Read
1224.99
1367.32
12%
491.14
-60%
1300 (1225 - 1386, n=4)
6%

* ... smaller is better

Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G
Sequential Read: 817 MB/s
Sequential Write: 705.6 MB/s
512K Read: 714.4 MB/s
512K Write: 602.8 MB/s
4K Read: 43.71 MB/s
4K Write: 93.01 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 266.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 163.5 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2543 Points ∼100% +75%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 1979, n=131)
1695 Points ∼67% +17%
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1634 Points ∼64% +13%
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8130U
1451 Points ∼57%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1425 Points ∼56% -2%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1408 Points ∼55% -3%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8130U
1366 Points ∼54% -6%
Average of class Convertible
  (173 - 8397, n=310)
1228 Points ∼48% -15%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1117 Points ∼100%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1399, n=102)
1103 Points ∼99%
Average of class Convertible
  (132 - 7397, n=220)
1003 Points ∼90%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8130U
819 Points ∼73%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
800 Points ∼72%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
771 Points ∼69%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9128 Points ∼100% +24%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11294, n=117)
9021 Points ∼99% +23%
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8130U
7357 Points ∼81%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
6942 Points ∼76% -6%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-51-30YA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8130U
6911 Points ∼76% -6%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
6595 Points ∼72% -10%
Average of class Convertible
  (1023 - 41871, n=271)
6587 Points ∼72% -10%
3DMark 11 Performance
1568 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6007 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite
1366x768 High Preset
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T
Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130
60.6 fps ∼100% +197%
Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB
Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130
48 fps ∼79% +135%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
42.2 fps ∼70% +107%
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
26.8 fps ∼44% +31%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (8.1 - 34.5, n=119)
26.6 fps ∼44% +30%
Average of class Convertible
  (2.1 - 149, n=176)
24.9 fps ∼41% +22%
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng
Intel Core i3-8130U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
20.41 fps ∼34%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
Intel Core i5-7200U, Intel HD Graphics 620
19.6 fps ∼32% -4%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel Core i5-7200U, Intel HD Graphics 620
19.02 fps ∼31% -7%
1280x720 Very Low Preset
Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T
Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130
120.5 fps ∼100% +163%
Lenovo Flex 6-14IKB
Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX130
115 fps ∼95% +151%
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
91.8 fps ∼76% +100%
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
62.3 fps ∼52% +36%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (18.3 - 81.7, n=119)
59.3 fps ∼49% +29%
Average of class Convertible
  (8.35 - 247, n=193)
48.6 fps ∼40% +6%
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng
Intel Core i3-8130U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
45.9 fps ∼38%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
Intel Core i5-7200U, Intel HD Graphics 620
41.4 fps ∼34% -10%
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
Intel Core i5-7200U, Intel HD Graphics 620
38.97 fps ∼32% -15%
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 45.923.4420.416.94fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 12.784.22.97fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 16.9105.43.8fps

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 31 / 31 dB
Carga
36.5 / 36.6 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.941.639.437.238.92536.238.436.63636.2313133.532.431.231403232.330.728.5325034.632.43032.234.66337.429.729.228.737.48030.427.728.128.630.410027.828.527.527.527.812528.829.526.725.128.816025.826.625.725.525.820027.525.525.223.627.52502525.623.823253152523.722.322.1254002323.821.9212350023.123.521.220.223.163023.523.2202023.58002424.219.318.724100025.425.719.217.925.4125025.825.618.71825.8160025.325.318.717.325.3200026.12618.217.326.1250027.327.218.217.327.331502525.317.817.225400024.825.317.81724.8500020.921.517.91720.9630019.319.417.717.119.3800018.318.417.617.118.31000017.91817.617.317.91250017.717.917.617.317.71600018.318.317.917.518.3SPL36.536.63130.236.5N2.42.41.41.22.4median 25median 25.3median 18.7median 17.9median 25Delta1.81.72.22.71.831.832.23134.531.833.83228.933.233.831.429.835.33831.427.83029.232.527.835.334.734.233.535.327.929.129.63027.92728.826.626.927262625.226.42625.225.1242625.224.124.52424.124.123.423.422.522.923.423.423.521.622.523.423.62421.420.923.622.222.619.920.222.222.622.819.919.722.62222.318.819222223.118.818.22227.329.218.317.927.326.728.317.717.826.723.625.317.617.423.624.326.217.717.524.325.527.417.617.525.522.628.217.717.722.62022.217.917.82019.220.118.117.919.218.519.217.91818.518.418.618.21818.418.318.318.318.118.318.218.218.21818.218.418.418.118.118.435.337.330.430.335.32.22.51.41.42.2median 22.6median 23.4median 18.3median 18.1median 22.62.32.922.12.334.533.832.933.834.53330.932.833.53336.735.734.33636.731.429.930.829.931.430.733.333.232.430.728.327.627.22928.327.929.326.826.727.929.426.526.72629.425.226.925.425.325.223.82423.622.723.823.824.1222223.82523.221.821.42527.82720.820.527.832.823.720.119.832.824.722.719.119.224.724.923.318.71824.926.725.718.417.826.740.131.617.517.440.137.232.617.517.137.229.625.517.917.129.6292617.417.42930.427.117.517.230.430.626.217.717.430.627.122.617.917.727.123.820.518.117.923.822.82018.117.822.821.219.118.218.121.220.518.918.418.120.519.218.518.218.119.219.118.518.418.219.14438.530.3304442.81.41.34median 25.2median 24median 18.4median 18.1median 25.23.22.521.53.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ngLenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GEAcer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
Carga Máxima
 32.7 °C30.7 °C30 °C 
 33.7 °C31.2 °C29.6 °C 
 29.1 °C27 °C27.6 °C 
Máximo: 33.7 °C
Médio: 30.2 °C
30.5 °C32.2 °C26.9 °C
31.1 °C41.6 °C33.5 °C
26.7 °C26.7 °C31.1 °C
Máximo: 41.6 °C
Médio: 31.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  41.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23.9 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.1 °C / 84.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (0 °C / 0 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.637.240.62537.23637.2313531.2354037.828.537.85037.632.237.66339.228.739.28039.128.639.110041.727.541.712542.825.142.816044.125.544.120046.923.646.925051.12351.131558.322.158.340060.12160.150058.620.258.663059.92059.980060.218.760.210006717.967125066.81866.8160068.317.368.3200067.217.367.2250066.817.366.8315067.217.267.2400070.61770.6500069.41769.4630066.417.166.4800060.717.160.71000063.617.363.61250060.117.360.11600055.217.555.2SPL78.830.278.8N41.51.241.5median 60.2median 17.9median 60.2Delta6.82.76.835.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ngApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.2 / 0.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3.9 / 5.9 / 7.1 Watt
Carga midlight 29.4 / 39 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng
8130U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
7200U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
Average of class Convertible
 
Power Consumption
-11%
17%
-16%
-11%
Idle Minimum *
3.9
3.9
-0%
2.9
26%
3.96 (1.3 - 12.4, n=138)
-2%
4.71 (1.3 - 23, n=356)
-21%
Idle Average *
5.9
7
-19%
5.2
12%
7.23 (4.3 - 15.5, n=138)
-23%
7.91 (3.8 - 32.3, n=356)
-34%
Idle Maximum *
7.1
9.3
-31%
5.4
24%
9.1 (5.2 - 16.6, n=138)
-28%
9.41 (4.1 - 61, n=356)
-33%
Load Average *
29.4
35
-19%
29.4
-0%
35.2 (12.9 - 51.6, n=138)
-20%
26.3 (1.4 - 94, n=354)
11%
Load Maximum *
39
33
15%
29.6
24%
42.6 (22 - 79, n=138)
-9%
31 (7.9 - 132, n=355)
21%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
12h 44min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7h 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 05min
HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng
8130U, UHD Graphics 620, 41 Wh
HP Pavilion x360 14-ba011ng
7200U, GeForce 940MX, 41.5 Wh
Lenovo Yoga 520-14IKB 80X80097GE
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 53 Wh
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TP410UA-EC242T
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Acer Spin 3 SP314-51-548L
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52.5 Wh
Average of class Convertible
 
Battery Runtime
-16%
39%
-9%
11%
14%
Reader / Idle
764
887
16%
765 (117 - 1985, n=282)
0%
H.264
324
602
86%
446 (206 - 1070, n=104)
38%
WiFi v1.3
446
373
-16%
500
12%
407
-9%
496
11%
450 (153 - 1010, n=231)
1%
Load
125
175
40%
147 (49 - 677, n=271)
18%

Pro

+ Design nobre com unidade de base de metal
+ Slot SATA-III livre
+ USB Tipo C
+ Painel IPS
+ SSD veloz
+ Baixas temperaturas
+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Sem entrada com caneta
- A carcaça range
- Difícil de prestar manutenção
- RAM de um canal
- Tela escura
- Ventilador barulhento
- Ventilador pulsante
In review: HP Pavilion x360. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.
In review: HP Pavilion x360. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

Um portátil ou um tablet? Este é o princípio por trás de um conversível. O novo HP Pavilion x360 quer combinar os dois dispositivos. Nosso modelo de teste por 700 Euros (~$797) é poderoso o suficiente para as tarefas mais comuns, mas o desempenho e um design agradável não são tudo.

A carcaça consiste em uma combinação de plástico/metal, que parece nobre e tem boa aparência. A impressão decente é infelizmente afetada por rangidos durante o uso.

Os dispositivos de entrada também deixam impressões misturadas. O teclado é adequado para tarefas ocasionais de escritório e é iluminado, mas a qualidade não é muito boa. O touchpad é melhor e realizou nossas entradas com rapidez e precisão, mas gostaríamos de ver dimensões maiores para a próxima iteração. Obviamente, você também pode usar a tela táctil de 14 polegadas para entradas, que é um método de entrada confiável. É lamentável que a HP não envie a série Pavilion com uma caneta stylus.

Depois, está a tela, que é brilhante e escura demais para um dispositivo moderno.

O desempenho, por outro lado, é bastante convincente; a CPU Intel Core i3 e a solução de armazenamento garantem um desempenho de sistema rápido e responsivo. Uma configuração de memória de canal duplo teria melhorado ainda mais o desempenho.

A última grande desvantagem é o ventilador, que é muito sensível às mudanças nas RPM, portanto você pode ouvi-lo praticamente toda vez que faz alguma coisa.

Há um desenvolvimento visível, mas sentimos falta de verdadeiros feitos e melhorias da HP.

O HP Pavilion x360 é um dispositivo de nível de entrada bom e barato, se você quiser um conversível duradouro e principalmente trabalhar em interiores. Ainda recomendamos que você verifique os dispositivos de comparação e nossa lista dos Top 10 Conversíveis se conta um uma reserva financeira.

HP Pavilion x360 14-cd0002ng - 01/03/2019 v6
Nino Richizzi

Acabamento
76 / 98 → 78%
Teclado
80%
Mouse
87%
Conectividade
48 / 80 → 60%
Peso
67 / 35-78 → 75%
Bateria
86%
Pantalha
78%
Desempenho do jogos
54 / 68 → 80%
Desempenho da aplicação
85 / 87 → 97%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
70%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Camera
40 / 85 → 48%
Médio
71%
80%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível HP Pavilion x360 (Core i3-8130U, SSD de 256 GB)
Nino Richizzi, 2019-01-10 (Update: 2019-01-11)