Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630

Sam Medley, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 02/25/2019

4K Chromebook. Os Chromebooks são conhecidos por sua acessibilidade e facilidade de uso. A Lenovo está mudando o paradigma com o Chromebook Yoga C630, um dispositivo Chrome OS relativamente caro que traz 4K para os Chromebooks. O C630 tem muita potência, mas alguns comprometimentos de usabilidade e preço reduzem as chances do dispositivo.

Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630-81JX0008UX (Yoga Chromebook C630 Serie)
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 620 - 1024 MB, Análises do: 1150 MHz, Integrados
Memória
8192 MB 
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, Multi-touch de 10 pontos, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 118 GB livre
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Headset (combo audio in/out), Card Reader: microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 17.85 x 361.5 x 248.5
Bateria
56 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Google Chrome OS
Camera
Webcam: HD (720p)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2x 2 Watts, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.027 kg, Suprimento de energia: 265 g
Preço
700 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

361.5 mm 248.5 mm 17.85 mm 2 kg330.9 mm 227 mm 22.4 mm 1.4 kg328.9 mm 230.1 mm 17.7 mm 1.8 kg326 mm 228 mm 15.5 mm 1.5 kg303.8 mm 207.9 mm 20.75 mm 1.4 kg292 mm 215.4 mm 19.6 mm 1.2 kg289 mm 220 mm 10 mm 1.3 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630-81JX0008UX
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
70.43 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Convertible
  (7.5 - 197, n=124)
59.8 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Dell Inspiron 7486 Chromebook 14 2-in-1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
56.89 MB/s ∼81% -19%
Acer Chromebook 14 CP5-471-53QV
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.5 MB/s ∼53% -47%
Lenovo Chromebook C330-81HY0000US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
30.8 MB/s ∼44% -56%
Dell Chromebook 11 3181 2-in-1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
20.12 MB/s ∼29% -71%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Inspiron 7486 Chromebook 14 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
673 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630-81JX0008UX
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
637 MBit/s ∼95%
Google Pixelbook
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
596 MBit/s ∼89% -6%
Average of class Convertible
  (28.7 - 678, n=138)
488 MBit/s ∼73% -23%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630-81JX0008UX
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
523 MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Convertible
  (36.4 - 685, n=138)
497 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Dell Inspiron 7486 Chromebook 14 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
491 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Google Pixelbook
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
462 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
259.2
cd/m²
295.9
cd/m²
273.6
cd/m²
241.3
cd/m²
281.2
cd/m²
264.6
cd/m²
224.2
cd/m²
258
cd/m²
260.6
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 295.9 cd/m² Médio: 262.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 76 %
iluminação com acumulador: 281.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 1172:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.63 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
Gamma: 2.349
Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630-81JX0008UX
IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
Google Pixelbook
IPS, 12.3, 2400x1600
Dell Inspiron 7486 Chromebook 14 2-in-1
IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Acer Chromebook 14 CP5-471-53QV
IPS, 14, 1920x1080
Lenovo Chromebook C330-81HY0000US
IPS, 11.6, 1366x768
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK
IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Dell Chromebook 11 3181 2-in-1
IPS, 11.6, 1366x768
Response Times
-24%
2%
12%
1%
18%
-10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38.4 (22, 16.4)
59.2 (29.6, 29.6)
-54%
40.8 (22, 18.8)
-6%
38 (19, 19)
1%
43.2 (21.6, 21.6)
-13%
38 (14, 24)
1%
52.8 (39.2, 13.6)
-38%
Response Time Black / White *
35.2 (19.6, 15.6)
36 (20, 16)
-2%
32 (17.2, 14.8)
9%
27 (16, 11)
23%
30.4 (16.4, 14)
14%
23 (5, 18)
35%
28.8 (16.4, 12.4)
18%
PWM Frequency
961.5 (99)
819.7 (100)
-15%
Screen
-4%
15%
17%
-27%
-14%
-38%
Brightness middle
281.2
473.9
69%
348.1
24%
214
-24%
198.9
-29%
192
-32%
213
-24%
Brightness
262
443
69%
321
23%
214
-18%
204
-22%
204
-22%
218
-17%
Brightness Distribution
76
80
5%
85
12%
90
18%
95
25%
88
16%
94
24%
Black Level *
0.24
0.35
-46%
0.28
-17%
0.1
58%
0.16
33%
0.23
4%
0.21
12%
Contrast
1172
1354
16%
1243
6%
2140
83%
1243
6%
835
-29%
1014
-13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.63
3.9
-7%
1.75
52%
3.24
11%
3.52
3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.5
7.7
-71%
4.74
-5%
17.61
-291%
18.36
-308%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.3
5.4
-64%
2.6
21%
3.86
-17%
1.6
52%
3.99
-21%
2.6
21%
Gamma
2.349 94%
2.13 103%
2.206 100%
2.42 91%
2.311 95%
2.45 90%
2.283 96%
CCT
6299 103%
7643 85%
6441 101%
6276 104%
6553 99%
6380 102%
6861 95%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-14% / -9%
9% / 12%
15% / 16%
-13% / -21%
2% / -6%
-24% / -32%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (40 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 961.5 Hz
≤ 99 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 961.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 961.5 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

Flickering occurs at relatively low brightness settings, so extended use at this brightness setting or lower can cause eyestrain.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9435 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (155 - 256, n=77)
215 Points ∼61% +26%
Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630-81JX0008UX
Intel Core i5-8250U
171.15 Points ∼49%
Average of class Convertible
  (33.5 - 288, n=163)
168 Points ∼48% -2%
Dell Inspiron 7486 Chromebook 14 2-in-1
Intel Core i3-8130U
160.93 Points ∼46% -6%
Google Pixelbook
Intel Core i5-7Y57
144.78 Points ∼41% -15%
Acer Chromebook 14 CP5-471-53QV
Intel Core i5-6200U
142.28 Points ∼40% -17%
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK
Mediatek MT8173C
56.99 Points ∼16% -67%
Lenovo Chromebook C330-81HY0000US
Mediatek MT8173C
53.997 Points ∼15% -68%
Dell Chromebook 11 3181 2-in-1
Intel Celeron N3060
40.362 Points ∼11% -76%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630-81JX0008UX
Intel Core i5-8250U
608 Points ∼75%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (470 - 608, n=4)
535 Points ∼66% -12%
Dell Inspiron 7486 Chromebook 14 2-in-1
Intel Core i3-8130U
472 Points ∼58% -22%
Google Pixelbook
Intel Core i5-7Y57
441 Points ∼55% -27%
Acer Chromebook 14 CP5-471-53QV
Intel Core i5-6200U
373 Points ∼46% -39%
Average of class Convertible
  (63 - 608, n=15)
296 Points ∼37% -51%
Lenovo Chromebook C330-81HY0000US
Mediatek MT8173C
216 Points ∼27% -64%
Dell Chromebook 11 3181 2-in-1
Intel Celeron N3060
163 Points ∼20% -73%
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK
Mediatek MT8173C
138 Points ∼17% -77%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630-81JX0008UX
Intel Core i5-8250U
35674 Points ∼68%
Google Pixelbook
Intel Core i5-7Y57
32334 Points ∼62% -9%
Dell Inspiron 7486 Chromebook 14 2-in-1
Intel Core i3-8130U
31980 Points ∼61% -10%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (22772 - 35817, n=54)
30123 Points ∼57% -16%
Acer Chromebook 14 CP5-471-53QV
Intel Core i5-6200U
27414 Points ∼52% -23%
Average of class Convertible
  (3067 - 42822, n=179)
21729 Points ∼41% -39%
Lenovo Chromebook C330-81HY0000US
Mediatek MT8173C
11089 Points ∼21% -69%
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK
Mediatek MT8173C
10139 Points ∼19% -72%
Dell Chromebook 11 3181 2-in-1
Intel Celeron N3060
7341 Points ∼14% -79%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Dell Chromebook 11 3181 2-in-1
Intel Celeron N3060
4901.1 ms * ∼8% -363%
Lenovo Chromebook C330-81HY0000US
Mediatek MT8173C
3683.7 ms * ∼6% -248%
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK
Mediatek MT8173C
3297.2 ms * ∼6% -211%
Average of class Convertible
  (809 - 9177, n=188)
2485 ms * ∼4% -135%
Acer Chromebook 14 CP5-471-53QV
Intel Core i5-6200U
1240 ms * ∼2% -17%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (986 - 1532, n=55)
1229 ms * ∼2% -16%
Google Pixelbook
Intel Core i5-7Y57
1163.3 ms * ∼2% -10%
Dell Inspiron 7486 Chromebook 14 2-in-1
Intel Core i3-8130U
1083.5 ms * ∼2% -2%
Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630-81JX0008UX
Intel Core i5-8250U
1059.5 ms * ∼2%
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score
Dell Chromebook 11 3181 2-in-1
Intel Celeron N3060
976 ms * ∼11% -267%
Lenovo Chromebook C330-81HY0000US
Mediatek MT8173C
838.7 ms * ∼9% -216%
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK
Mediatek MT8173C
577.7 ms * ∼6% -118%
Acer Chromebook 14 CP5-471-53QV
Intel Core i5-6200U
298.2 ms * ∼3% -12%
Dell Inspiron 7486 Chromebook 14 2-in-1
Intel Core i3-8130U
282.7 ms * ∼3% -6%
Google Pixelbook
Intel Core i5-7Y57
268.1 ms * ∼3% -1%
Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630-81JX0008UX
Intel Core i5-8250U
265.6 ms * ∼3%
Average of class Convertible
  (63.8 - 1002, n=123)
250 ms * ∼3% +6%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U
  (74.8 - 266, n=15)
108 ms * ∼1% +59%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso
28 / 28 / 28 dB
Carga
29.2 / 32.4 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28 dB(A)
Carga Máxima
 28 °C29 °C28 °C 
 27.4 °C27.4 °C21.4 °C 
 22.2 °C21.2 °C20.4 °C 
Máximo: 29 °C
Médio: 25 °C
26.4 °C37.8 °C36 °C
25 °C30.2 °C31.2 °C
24.2 °C26.2 °C27.2 °C
Máximo: 37.8 °C
Médio: 29.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  36 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.4 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 22.2 °C / 72 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (+6.8 °C / 12.2 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203938.12538.138.23137.838.14038.936.75034.438.46333.435.58033.134.410033.235.112532.733.716032.641.920030.947.825030.556.531529.959.640029.263.850029.162.563029.267.480028.470.8100028.264.7125028.164.7160027.766.7200027.764.7250027.462.3315027.466.9400027.468.6500027.366.4630027.167.380002768.4100002764.61250026.963.21600026.957.8SPL39.978.5N3.745.4median 28.1median 64.6Delta1.66.442.338.334.433.634.132.63131.329.832.430.429.730.531.22829.727.129.426.33925.648.725.553.224.955.624.257.224.259.323.559.8236923.367.12364.223.266.723.165.522.960.622.661.322.767.122.860.222.860.122.766.522.768.322.763.222.863.435.276.92.439.9median 23.1median 60.61.26.234.639.535.134.73433.531.932.13233.530.334.329.130.829.133.628.238.427.942.127.244.626.649.525.453.924.952.924.455.223.960.123.863.823.560.723.168.722.970.222.769.122.570.222.568.322.268.722.166.622.267.622.361.322.258.922.36222.350.435.179.32.442.6median 23.1median 60.71.78.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Yoga Chromebook C630-81JX0008UXDell Inspiron 7486 Chromebook 14 2-in-1Google Pixelbook
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630-81JX0008UX audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell Inspiron 7486 Chromebook 14 2-in-1 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.03 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Google Pixelbook audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.47 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.3 / 9.3 / 9.5 Watt
Carga midlight 12.9 / 43.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630-81JX0008UX
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Dell Inspiron 7486 Chromebook 14 2-in-1
8130U, UHD Graphics 630, 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo Chromebook C330-81HY0000US
MT8173C, PowerVR GX6250, , IPS, 1366x768, 11.6
Dell Chromebook 11 3181 2-in-1
N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1366x768, 11.6
Acer Chromebook 14 CP5-471-53QV
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK
MT8173C, PowerVR GX6250, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Power Consumption
22%
45%
36%
-2%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
1.6
-23%
1.4
-8%
1.8
-38%
2.7
-108%
3.8
-192%
Idle Average *
9.3
6.3
32%
4.9
47%
4.9
47%
6.2
33%
6.2
33%
Idle Maximum *
9.5
6.5
32%
5
47%
5
47%
6.7
29%
6.6
31%
Load Average *
12.9
8.1
37%
5.3
59%
6.8
47%
14
-9%
11
15%
Load Maximum *
43.3
28.6
34%
7.9
82%
9.8
77%
24
45%
12.7
71%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 23min
Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630-81JX0008UX
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh
Google Pixelbook
7Y57, HD Graphics 615, 41 Wh
Dell Inspiron 7486 Chromebook 14 2-in-1
8130U, UHD Graphics 630, 56 Wh
Lenovo Chromebook C330-81HY0000US
MT8173C, PowerVR GX6250, 45 Wh
Dell Chromebook 11 3181 2-in-1
N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 42 Wh
Acer Chromebook 14 CP5-471-53QV
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK
MT8173C, PowerVR GX6250, 53.9 Wh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
383
835
118%
637
66%
698
82%
772
102%
540
41%
773
102%

Pro

+ Tela 4K nítida
+ Quad-core poderoso, CPU de oito subprocessos
+ 8 GB de RAM são mais que suficientes para o Chrome OS
+ Opções de armazenamento abundantes
+ Touchpad e tela táctil responsivos
+ Materiais premium

Contra

- Pesado e massivo
- Iluminação de fundo da tela muito escura
- Desempenho gráfico problemático
- Duração pobre da bateria
- Alto consumo de energia em comparação com a concorrência
In review: Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630. Review unit provided by Lenovo.
In review: Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630. Review unit provided by Lenovo.

O Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630 é uma poderosa besta 4K que, no final, prova ser demais para o Chrome OS lidar. Embora o C630 seja um dos portáteis com o SO Chrome mais avançado de todos os tempos, a maior parte desse poder é excessiva e prejudica os fatores que fazem os Chromebooks se destacarem no mercado.

Em particular, a duração da bateria é baixa em comparação com os concorrentes e está muito longe do que esperamos de um Chromebook. Além disso, o dispositivo é talvez o Chromebook menos portátil que já testamos. Esse é o preço a pagar por um portátil conversível de 15,6 polegadas. Para uma família de dispositivos que se vende para usuários em em movimento, o C630 fica pesado e desconfortável para transportá-lo de casa para a sala de aula, para o trabalho, para um café.

O C630 não oferece o suficiente para se distanciar significativamente dos concorrentes. O Pixelbook não é muito mais caro e oferece a maioria dessas sutilezas em um pacote mais compacto. O Inspiron Chromebook 14 da Dell tem um formato ligeiramente menor e acompanha o desempenho do Chromebook Yoga C630 pelo mesmo preço. O Inspiron também inclui uma caneta ativa e possui uma das melhores exibições que já vimos em um Chromebook.

Existem algumas coisas boas. Por um lado, a tela 4K é nítida e bonita. Além disso, as opções generosas de RAM e armazenamento "futureproof", o dispositivo como o Chrome OS, inevitavelmente se tornarão mais exigentes no futuro. Considerando os avanços que a Google fez na integração nativa do Android e do Linux no Chrome OS, pode não demorar muito para que os 8 GB de RAM se tornem a norma para os Chromebooks. 

Considerando tudo, o Lenovo Yoga Chromebook é um dispositivo competente, mas se sente sobre dimensionado para o software que está executa. Embora a tela 4K, 8 GB de RAM e CPU Core i5 sejam ótimas caixas de verificação para o marketing, eles acabam oferecendo pouco mais do que outros Chromebooks premium. O C630 subsequentemente se sente muito inchado para o Chrome OS. Existem melhores opções nesta faixa de preço.

Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630-81JX0008UX - 02/22/2019 v6
Sam Medley

Acabamento
83 / 98 → 85%
Teclado
90%
Mouse
94%
Conectividade
43 / 80 → 54%
Peso
63 / 35-78 → 65%
Bateria
88%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
0 / 68 → 
Desempenho da aplicação
83 / 87 → 95%
Temperatura
97%
Ruído
99%
Audio
50 / 91 → 55%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Médio
77%
83%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Lenovo Yoga Chromebook C630
Sam Medley, 2019-02-25 (Update: 2019-02-27)