Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Conversível Topjoy Falcon (Modelo de Pré Produção)

Klaus Hinum, 👁 Klaus Hinum, Katja Steyrleuthner (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 10/30/2018

Mini laptop. O Topjoy Falcon atualmente listado no Kickstarter é um mini conversível com o Windows 10 e um processador quad-core Gemini-Lake com refrigeração ativa. Usamos um modelo de pré-produção da Topjoy para nossa análise, executando-o na maioria das nossas séries de testes. Descubra as vantagens e desvantagens do minicomputador em nossa análise.

Topjoy Falcon
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR3-2400 single channel
Pantalha
8 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 275 PPI, Multitouch, native pen support, AUO17D8, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Gemini Lake
Disco rígido
FORESEE 256GB, 256 GB 
, 214 GB livre
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC269
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: Fones
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n/ac)
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20 x 200 x 130
Bateria
38 Wh Lítio-Ion, Duração da bateria (de acordo com o fabricante): 8 h
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Island, Iluminação do Teclado: sim
Released
10/25/2018
peso
680 g
Preço
859 Dollar
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

USB-C (probably Gen.1) with charging function, mini-HDMI, audio port, USB 3.0 (Type-A)
USB-C (probably Gen.1) with charging function, mini-HDMI, audio port, USB 3.0 (Type-A)
279
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
252
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
264
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 287 cd/m² Médio: 269.1 cd/m² Minimum: 32.8 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 266 cd/m²
Contraste: 782:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.6 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 2.7
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.19
Topjoy Falcon
AUO17D8, , 1920x1080, 8
Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102
PVO, , 1920x1200, 8.9
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Sharp SHP14A6, , 1800x1200, 10
Chuwi LapBook SE
1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
138%
4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37 (17, 20)
44 (22, 22)
-19%
39.2 (19.2, 20)
-6%
Response Time Black / White *
33.6 (20, 13.6)
25.6 (11.6, 14)
24%
27.7 (14.8, 12.9)
18%
PWM Frequency
200 (100, 266)
1020 (99)
410%
200 (29)
0%
Screen
-22%
53%
-36%
Brightness middle
266
207
-22%
456
71%
227
-15%
Brightness
269
205
-24%
426
58%
210
-22%
Brightness Distribution
88
89
1%
88
0%
89
1%
Black Level *
0.34
0.14
59%
0.31
9%
0.44
-29%
Contrast
782
1479
89%
1471
88%
516
-34%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.6
7.98
-122%
1.3
64%
6.6
-83%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.2
3
63%
12.2
-49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.7
1.1
59%
1.9
30%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.6
8.36
-132%
1.4
61%
7.9
-119%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.21 100%
2.24 98%
2.16 102%
CCT
6442 101%
7768 84%
6687 97%
8879 73%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
41
62.3
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
64
96.8
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-22% / -22%
96% / 74%
-16% / -26%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 13.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (40.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting
≤ 266 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % (266 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

Flickering occurs even at high brightness setting and may have an effect on the user during everyday use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8758 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250Tooltip
Topjoy Falcon Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel Pentium Silver N5000: Ø222 (221.28-228.02)
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel Pentium Silver N5000: Ø232 (230.48-237.35)
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel Pentium Silver N5000: Ø230 (228.26-236.29)
Chuwi LapBook SE Intel Celeron N4100, Intel Celeron N4100: Ø158 (150.45-161.13)
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 Intel Core m3-7Y30, Intel Core m3-7Y30: Ø238 (227.93-249.83)
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y: Ø163 (162.13-163.67)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
105 Points ∼100% +35%
Average of class Convertible
  (19 - 177, n=269)
101 Points ∼96% +29%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
91 Points ∼87% +17%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
90 Points ∼86% +15%
Topjoy Falcon
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
78 Points ∼74%
Average Intel Pentium Silver N5000
  (73 - 80, n=6)
77.5 Points ∼74% -1%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
77 Points ∼73% -1%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
73 Points ∼70% -6%
Chuwi LapBook SE
Intel Celeron N4100
69.8 Points ∼66% -11%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
65 Points ∼62% -17%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Intel Atom Z3795
38 Points ∼36% -51%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Convertible
  (33 - 761, n=275)
276 Points ∼100% +19%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel Core m3-7Y30
250 (min: 227.93, max: 249.83) Points ∼91% +8%
Average Intel Pentium Silver N5000
  (231 - 284, n=6)
248 Points ∼90% +7%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
237 Points ∼86% +3%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
236 Points ∼86% +2%
Topjoy Falcon
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
231 (min: 221.28, max: 228.02) Points ∼84%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
218 Points ∼79% -6%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
164 Points ∼59% -29%
Chuwi LapBook SE
Intel Celeron N4100
161 (min: 150.45, max: 161.13) Points ∼58% -30%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Intel Atom Z3795
118 Points ∼43% -49%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
78 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
18.22 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
231 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook 12 2017
HD Graphics 615, 7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256
3946 Points ∼100% +26%
Average of class Convertible
  (1007 - 5281, n=199)
3645 Points ∼92% +17%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
3550 Points ∼90% +14%
Average Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel UHD Graphics 605
  (3122 - 3525, n=5)
3270 Points ∼83% +5%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
3259 Points ∼83% +4%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3125 Points ∼79% 0%
Topjoy Falcon
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, FORESEE 256GB
3122 Points ∼79%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3795, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1227 Points ∼31% -61%
Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1008 Points ∼26% -68%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook 12 2017
HD Graphics 615, 7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256
3078 Points ∼100% +39%
Average of class Convertible
  (741 - 4741, n=245)
2739 Points ∼89% +24%
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW128G7
2685 Points ∼87% +21%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
2550 Points ∼83% +15%
Average Intel Pentium Silver N5000, Intel UHD Graphics 605
  (2141 - 2381, n=5)
2252 Points ∼73% +2%
Topjoy Falcon
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, FORESEE 256GB
2216 Points ∼72%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2201 Points ∼72% -1%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
UHD Graphics 605, N5000, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
2141 Points ∼70% -3%
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3795, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1139 Points ∼37% -49%
Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, 32 GB eMMC Flash
911 Points ∼30% -59%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y, 64 GB eMMC Flash
741 Points ∼24% -67%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2216 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
2672 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3122 pontos
Ajuda
Topjoy Falcon
FORESEE 256GB
FORESEE 256GB
Sequential Read: 472.2MB/s
Sequential Write: 431.4MB/s
4K Read: 12.06MB/s
4K Write: 26.05MB/s
4K-64 Read: 87.93MB/s
4K-64 Write: 188MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.23ms
Access Time Write: 0.444ms
Score Read: 147Points
Score Write: 257Points
Score Total: 482Points
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
1383.5 (min: 1376, max: 1390) Points ∼100% +86%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
1257 Points ∼91% +69%
Average of class Convertible
  (173 - 7483, n=298)
1178 Points ∼85% +59%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
757 Points ∼55% +2%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 605
  (612 - 902, n=6)
757 Points ∼55% +2%
Topjoy Falcon
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
742 Points ∼54%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
626 Points ∼45% -16%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
612 Points ∼44% -18%
Chuwi LapBook SE
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4100
482 Points ∼35% -35%
3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
7138 (min: 7124, max: 7152) Points ∼100% +59%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
6602 Points ∼92% +47%
Average of class Convertible
  (1023 - 37388, n=258)
6396 Points ∼90% +43%
Topjoy Falcon
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
4485 Points ∼63%
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
4200 Points ∼59% -6%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 605
  (3261 - 4485, n=4)
3824 Points ∼54% -15%
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
3349 Points ∼47% -25%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel UHD Graphics 605, Intel Pentium Silver N5000
3261 Points ∼46% -27%
Chuwi LapBook SE
Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4100
2826 Points ∼40% -37%
3DMark 06 Standard
4171 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
824 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
3723 pontos
Ajuda
World of Warships - 1366x768 Low Preset AF:Trilinear
HP 15-da0405ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX110, 8250U
89.2 fps ∼100% +261%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3, 2200U
67.3 fps ∼75% +172%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
66.7 (min: 39, max: 89) fps ∼75% +170%
Average of class Convertible
  (15 - 103, n=11)
53.3 fps ∼60% +116%
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE
Intel HD Graphics 610, 4415U
47.3 fps ∼53% +91%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-21-651Y
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge), A6-9220
30 fps ∼34% +21%
Lenovo Ideapad 320-17AST-80XW0013GE
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge), E2-9000
25.5 fps ∼29% +3%
Topjoy Falcon
Intel UHD Graphics 605, N5000
24.7 (min: 11, max: 35) fps ∼28%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 605
  (22.7 - 24.7, n=2)
23.7 fps ∼27% -4%
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
Intel UHD Graphics 605, N5000
22.7 fps ∼25% -8%
Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE
Intel UHD Graphics 600, N4100
20 fps ∼22% -19%
baixo média alto ultra
World of Warships (2015) 24.7fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 4.4fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 9.165.5fps
Carga Máxima
 30 °C30 °C31 °C 
 27 °C30 °C31 °C 
 28 °C29 °C30 °C 
Máximo: 31 °C
Médio: 29.6 °C
32 °C33 °C28 °C
32 °C31 °C28 °C
32 °C31 °C29 °C
Máximo: 33 °C
Médio: 30.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  32 °C | Temperatura do quarto 19 °C | Fluke 62 Mini + Fluke t3000 FC
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.4 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.2 °C / 84.6 F (-0.8 °C / -1.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.335.12532.931.83131.8324036.535.15032.428.9633328.98036.328.810048.32712561.52716052.924.820060.92425062.822.731563.32240069.521.250067.82163074.82080075.919.4100072.718.912507117.7160070.117.820006917.6250071.817.6315068.117.6400071.417.6500073.717.6630070.417.5800071.617.61000071.617.61250069.617.41600059.717.5SPL83.630.6N62.51.5median 69.6median 17.8Delta4.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.6 / 1.73 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.5 / 4 / 4.1 Watt
Carga midlight 8.1 / 19.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Topjoy Falcon
N5000, UHD Graphics 605, FORESEE 256GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 8
Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102
Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1200, 8.9
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1800x1200, 10
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Z3795, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 128 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 8.3
Chuwi LapBook SE
N4100, UHD Graphics 600, SanDisk DF4032, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Average Intel UHD Graphics 605
 
Average of class Convertible
 
Power Consumption
11%
-50%
-51%
-47%
-25%
-120%
Idle Minimum *
2.5
1.8
28%
2.88
-15%
4.9
-96%
2.7
-8%
2.83 (2.3 - 3.4, n=4)
-13%
4.77 (2.2 - 23, n=338)
-91%
Idle Average *
4
3.2
20%
4.8
-20%
7.4
-85%
6.3
-58%
4.93 (4 - 5.9, n=4)
-23%
7.93 (4 - 32.3, n=338)
-98%
Idle Maximum *
4.1
4.4
-7%
7.5
-83%
7.5
-83%
7.6
-85%
5.8 (4.1 - 7.5, n=4)
-41%
9.41 (4.1 - 61, n=338)
-130%
Load Average *
8.1
10.8
-33%
16.9
-109%
11.8
-46%
12.6
-56%
12.9 (8.1 - 15.4, n=4)
-59%
26.2 (1.4 - 94, n=336)
-223%
Load Maximum *
19.6
10.6
46%
23.8
-21%
8.9
55%
24.6
-26%
17.8 (15 - 21.4, n=4)
9%
30.5 (10.4 - 117, n=337)
-56%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 37min
Topjoy Falcon
N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 38 Wh
Toshiba Satellite Click Mini L9W-B-102
Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 39 Wh
Apple MacBook 12 2017
7Y32, HD Graphics 615, 41.4 Wh
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh
Fujitsu Stylistic V535
Z3795, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 17.7 Wh
Chuwi LapBook SE
N4100, UHD Graphics 600, 37 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad D330-10IGM
N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 39 Wh
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG
N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 53.9 Wh
Eve-Tech Eve V m3
7Y30, HD Graphics 615, 48 Wh
Average of class Convertible
 
Battery Runtime
78%
60%
33%
-25%
32%
103%
120%
32%
Reader / Idle
1066
771
761 (117 - 1985, n=275)
WiFi v1.3
337
600
78%
540
60%
448
33%
252
-25%
444
32%
684
103%
740
120%
446 (153 - 1010, n=215)
32%
Load
251
180
347
148 (49 - 677, n=264)
H.264
384
564
607
449 (206 - 1070, n=100)

Pro

+ Carcaça robusta
+ Tamanho pequeno
+ Desempenho estável da CPU graças a um ventilador
+ A carcaça permanece fria sob uso intenso

Contra

- Leva um tempo se acostumar ao teclado e ao trackpad
- Caneta não calibrada de forma precisa
- PWM no atual modelo de pr-e produção
- Recepção WLAN fraca

O Topjoy Falcon é um pequeno conversível com uma carcaça de alta qualidade. Enquanto em termos de dispositivos de entrada, você precisa fazer algumas concessões significativas em partes, o desempenho do quad-core Gemini-Lake permanece sem culpa, graças também ao ventilador integrado. Em termos de tela, a Topjoy ainda pretende fazer algumas melhorias e usar um modelo com maior brilho. Essa seria nossa principal reclamação sobre o painel AUO embutido (além do uso de PWM até 100% de brilho). Nós realmente recomendamos a caneta ativa opcional, uma vez que ajuda consideravelmente na operação da tela pequena.

No geral, o Falcon é um conceito muito interessante, mas ainda precisa de algum ajuste em seu estado atual. Para o reduzido Preço Kickstarter a partir de $399 (~350 Euros), você poderia obter um segundo portátil prático para a estrada a um preço acessível. No entanto, você precisaria confiar em que a Topjoy ainda fará sua lição de casa. 

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Topjoy Falcon (Modelo de Pré Produção)
Klaus Hinum, 2018-10-30 (Update: 2018-10-31)