Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Conversível VAIO A12 (Core i7-8500Y, 16 GB RAM, SSD de 512 GB, FHD)

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Andreas Osthoff, T. Hinum (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/02/2019

Muito caro! VAIO, a antiga divisão de PCs da Sony, está de volta para atrapalhar o mercado, ou pelo menos tentar fazê-lo. Um de seus dispositivos de retorno é o VAIO A12, um conversível de 12,5 polegadas que pode ter dificuldade em justificar seu alto preço. Continue lendo para descobrir como o A12 funciona em nossos testes e se pode causar problemas para outros 2-em-1 de 12,5 polegadas, como o Surface Pro.

VAIO A12-92993
Processador
Intel Core i7-8500Y
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Análises do: 300 - 1050 MHz, 25.20.100.6374
Memória
16384 MB 
, soldada, dual channel, máximo 16 GB
Pantalha
12.5 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 176 PPI, native pen support, InfoVision IVO04E6, IPS, Brilhante: sim, detachable screen
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB 
, 452 GB livre
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado para fones e microfone de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões SD (SDHC/SDXC), até 32GB para SDHC, até 512GB para SDXC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek USB GBE Familiy Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1, Telit LN940, LTE
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 24 x 305.5 x 211.9
Bateria
23.4 Wh Lítio-Ion
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.07 MPix
Secondary Camera: 0 MPix Windows Hello
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação, Caneta VAIO Digitizer, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
1.1 kg, Suprimento de energia: 290 g
Preço
2799 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

320 mm 235 mm 15.4 mm 1.5 kg305.5 mm 211.9 mm 24 mm 1.1 kg304 mm 225.6 mm 8.9 mm 1.3 kg300 mm 231.5 mm 7.9 mm 1.2 kg292 mm 210 mm 9.75 mm 1.3 kg292 mm 201 mm 8.5 mm 1.1 kg
Left-hand side: Kensington lock, 2x USB 2.0 Type-A, SD card reader
Left-hand side: Kensington lock, 2x USB 2.0 Type-A, SD card reader
Right-hand side: Power button, volume rocker with an integrated fingerprint scanner, micro SIM, USB Type-C, 3.5 mm jack, USB 3.0 Type-A, HDMI, VGA, RJ45 LAN, DC-in
Right-hand side: Power button, volume rocker with an integrated fingerprint scanner, micro SIM, USB Type-C, 3.5 mm jack, USB 3.0 Type-A, HDMI, VGA, RJ45 LAN, DC-in
Front: No connections
Front: No connections
Back: No connections
Back: No connections
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
142.2 MB/s ∼100% +394%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
78.9 MB/s ∼55% +174%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
78.5 MB/s ∼55% +173%
Average of class Convertible
  (7.5 - 197, n=122)
60 MB/s ∼42% +108%
VAIO A12-92993
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28.8 MB/s ∼20%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
211.8 MB/s ∼100% +611%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
86.4 MB/s ∼41% +190%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
84.2 MB/s ∼40% +183%
Average of class Convertible
  (21.7 - 246, n=120)
74.5 MB/s ∼35% +150%
VAIO A12-92993
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
29.8 MB/s ∼14%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
653 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
633 MBit/s ∼97% +11%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
616 MBit/s ∼94% +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
593 (min: 560, max: 611) MBit/s ∼91% +4%
VAIO A12-92993
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
570 MBit/s ∼87%
Average of class Convertible
  (28.7 - 678, n=136)
487 MBit/s ∼75% -15%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
314 MBit/s ∼48% -45%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
598 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
VAIO A12-92993
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
588 MBit/s ∼98%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
559 (min: 519, max: 577) MBit/s ∼93% -5%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
532 MBit/s ∼89% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
514 MBit/s ∼86% -13%
Average of class Convertible
  (36.4 - 685, n=136)
496 MBit/s ∼83% -16%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
305 MBit/s ∼51% -48%
280
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 315 cd/m² Médio: 293.6 cd/m² Minimum: 9.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 315 cd/m²
Contraste: 1500:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1, calibrated: 2.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
69.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 44% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.02
VAIO A12-92993
InfoVision IVO04E6, , 1920x1080, 12.5
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
SHP1479, , 1920x1280, 12.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
LP130QP1-SPA1, , 3000x2000, 13
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
AU Optronics AUO101A, , 3000x2000, 13
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
AU Optronics AUO572D, , 1920x1080, 13.3
Response Times
720%
20%
-14%
13%
-10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
52.8 (24.4, 28.4)
43 (21, 22)
19%
56.8 (26.8, 30)
-8%
47.2 (21.2, 26)
11%
47 (23, 24)
11%
52 (24.4, 27.6)
2%
Response Time Black / White *
30.4 (15.6, 14.8)
25 (13, 12)
18%
36 (19.6, 16.4)
-18%
42.4 (19.6, 22.8)
-39%
26 (14, 12)
14%
37.2 (21.2, 16)
-22%
PWM Frequency
990.1 (99)
22000 (50)
2122%
1852 (98)
87%
Screen
19%
10%
20%
5%
22%
Brightness middle
315
484
54%
548
74%
474
50%
452
43%
389.8
24%
Brightness
294
473
61%
545
85%
418
42%
412
40%
396
35%
Brightness Distribution
89
91
2%
86
-3%
76
-15%
85
-4%
88
-1%
Black Level *
0.21
0.33
-57%
0.51
-143%
0.33
-57%
0.48
-129%
0.27
-29%
Contrast
1500
1467
-2%
1075
-28%
1436
-4%
942
-37%
1444
-4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.4
4.29
2%
3.65
17%
3.2
27%
4.05
8%
2.72
38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.1
6.46
9%
7.15
-1%
6.1
14%
6.64
6%
5.49
23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.9
1.34
54%
1.81
38%
0.9
69%
1.56
46%
1.25
57%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.8
4.3
10%
5.5
-15%
4.5
6%
4.87
-1%
4.2
12%
Gamma
2.02 109%
2.51 88%
2.154 102%
2.07 106%
2.71 81%
2.1 105%
CCT
7307 89%
7315 89%
7052 92%
5881 111%
7160 91%
7470 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
44
62
41%
65.2
48%
64
45%
62
41%
62.2
41%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
69.5
95
37%
99.1
43%
99.4
43%
97
40%
98.2
41%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
370% / 169%
15% / 13%
3% / 15%
9% / 6%
6% / 17%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN: Greyscale (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: Greyscale (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: Colour Saturation (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: Colour Saturation (uncalibrated)
CalMAN: Greyscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Greyscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24.4 ms rise
↘ 28.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 990.1 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 990.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 990.1 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9447 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC latencies
Intel Extreme Utility
Intel Extreme Utility (Benchmark)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
VAIO A12-92993 Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel Core i7-8500Y: Ø232 (221.39-245.57)
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U: Ø571 (559.56-638.59)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel Core i5-8350U: Ø488 (465.07-568.99)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U; Undervolting: Ø640 (589.9-694.88)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø550 (498.05-645.36)
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel Core i5-8350U: Ø486 (481.08-516.94)
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel Core i7-8500Y: Ø220 (212.35-271)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
163 Points ∼75% +29%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
151 Points ∼69% +20%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
147 Points ∼67% +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
141 Points ∼65% +12%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
132 Points ∼61% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (126 - 132, n=2)
129 Points ∼59% +2%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
126 Points ∼58%
Average of class Convertible
  (19 - 179, n=292)
104 Points ∼48% -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
695 Points ∼16% +206%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
661 Points ∼15% +191%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
639 Points ∼15% +181%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
517 Points ∼12% +128%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
514 Points ∼12% +126%
Average of class Convertible
  (33 - 761, n=299)
292 Points ∼7% +29%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
271 Points ∼6% +19%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (227 - 271, n=2)
249 Points ∼6% +10%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
227 Points ∼5%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
1.71 Points ∼70% +16%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
1.69 Points ∼69% +15%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
1.47 Points ∼60%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (1.43 - 1.47, n=2)
1.45 Points ∼59% -1%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
1.43 Points ∼59% -3%
Average of class Convertible
  (0.24 - 2.01, n=218)
1.12 Points ∼46% -24%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
5.95 Points ∼22% +135%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
5.48 Points ∼20% +117%
Average of class Convertible
  (0.45 - 8.56, n=227)
2.81 Points ∼10% +11%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
2.53 Points ∼9%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (2.45 - 2.53, n=2)
2.49 Points ∼9% -2%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
2.45 Points ∼9% -3%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
320 Points ∼63%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
 
320 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Convertible
  (78 - 431, n=9)
306 Points ∼60% -4%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Convertible
  (220 - 1504, n=9)
902 Points ∼18% +54%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
584 Points ∼12%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
 
584 Points ∼12% 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
32487 Points ∼62% +32%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
31171 Points ∼59% +26%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
30033 Points ∼57% +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
28118 Points ∼54% +14%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
24696 Points ∼47%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (24567 - 24696, n=2)
24632 Points ∼47% 0%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
24567 Points ∼47% -1%
Average of class Convertible
  (3067 - 42822, n=177)
21607 Points ∼41% -13%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Convertible
  (809 - 9177, n=186)
2500 ms * ∼4% -95%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
1822.2 ms * ∼3% -42%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (1281 - 1822, n=2)
1552 ms * ∼3% -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel Core i5-8250U
1379.8 ms * ∼2% -8%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel Core i5-8350U
1288.9 ms * ∼2% -1%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
1281.4 ms * ∼2%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
1189.2 ms * ∼2% +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel Core i7-8650U
1177 ms * ∼2% +8%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Convertible
  (0.58 - 4.9, n=13)
3.42 fps ∼19% +61%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
2.12 fps ∼12%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
 
2.12 fps ∼12% 0%
Blender 2.79 - ---
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
2159 Seconds * ∼23% -22%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y
  (1772 - 2159, n=2)
1965 Seconds * ∼21% -11%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel Core i7-8500Y
1771.6 Seconds * ∼19%
Average of class Convertible
  (762 - 4929, n=12)
1511 Seconds * ∼16% +15%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R20
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
 
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
1.32 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit
2.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
27.17 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.53 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
27 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
126 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
227 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
37.07 fps
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
2952 Points ∼100% +49%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2939 Points ∼100% +49%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
2840 Points ∼96% +44%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2714 Points ∼92% +37%
Average of class Convertible
  (605 - 4342, n=89)
2453 Points ∼83% +24%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
1978 Points ∼67%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (1791 - 1978, n=2)
1885 Points ∼64% -5%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
1791 Points ∼61% -9%
Productivity
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
6238 Points ∼100% +4%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6026 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (5745 - 6026, n=2)
5886 Points ∼94% -2%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5745 Points ∼92% -5%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5698 Points ∼91% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5509 Points ∼88% -9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
5353 Points ∼86% -11%
Average of class Convertible
  (1121 - 7077, n=91)
5199 Points ∼83% -14%
Essentials
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
7995 Points ∼100% +11%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7919 Points ∼99% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7460 Points ∼93% +4%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7195 Points ∼90%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
7039 Points ∼88% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (6741 - 7195, n=2)
6968 Points ∼87% -3%
Average of class Convertible
  (2489 - 9291, n=91)
6869 Points ∼86% -5%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6741 Points ∼84% -6%
Score
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3737 Points ∼100% +18%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3559 Points ∼95% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3544 Points ∼95% +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
3448 Points ∼92% +9%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3161 Points ∼85%
Average of class Convertible
  (872 - 4347, n=92)
3132 Points ∼84% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (2945 - 3161, n=2)
3053 Points ∼82% -3%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2945 Points ∼79% -7%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4764 Points ∼100% +1%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4700 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (4406 - 4700, n=2)
4553 Points ∼96% -3%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4406 Points ∼92% -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
4262 Points ∼89% -9%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4200 Points ∼88% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4136 Points ∼87% -12%
Average of class Convertible
  (1007 - 5281, n=221)
3707 Points ∼78% -21%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3776 Points ∼100% +8%
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3493 Points ∼93%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3479 Points ∼92% 0%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3413 Points ∼90% -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
3281 Points ∼87% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-8500Y, Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (2737 - 3493, n=2)
3115 Points ∼82% -11%
Average of class Convertible
  (741 - 4741, n=268)
2776 Points ∼74% -21%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2737 Points ∼72% -22%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3493 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4126 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4700 pontos
Ajuda
VAIO A12-92993
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-40%
-27%
-3%
-16%
-17%
43%
Write 4K
113.9
83.23
-27%
121.7
7%
95.43
-16%
90.97
-20%
140
23%
122 (90.4 - 166, n=43)
7%
Read 4K
46.8
43.84
-6%
32.66
-30%
39.19
-16%
36.84
-21%
52.38
12%
42.8 (28 - 61.3, n=42)
-9%
Write Seq
1868
636.4
-66%
359.3
-81%
1197
-36%
947.5
-49%
1513 (112 - 2125, n=43)
-19%
Read Seq
2226
899.7
-60%
1463
-34%
1705
-23%
922.1
-59%
1666 (501 - 2494, n=43)
-25%
Write 4K Q32T1
313.4
192.9
-38%
353.6
13%
399.24
27%
355.8
14%
227.8
-27%
411 (198 - 1707, n=43)
31%
Read 4K Q32T1
284.6
247.36
-13%
387
36%
260.67
-8%
256.9
-10%
299.2
5%
401 (268 - 1015, n=43)
41%
Write Seq Q32T1
1880.5
861.1
-54%
358.1
-81%
1286.9
-32%
1222
-35%
1259
-33%
1920 (1714 - 2128, n=43)
2%
Read Seq Q32T1
3401.9
1615
-53%
1779
-48%
3024.8
-11%
3460
2%
3112
-9%
3009 (1772 - 3540, n=43)
-12%
Write 4K Q8T8
410.2
381
-7%
1502 (410 - 1814, n=9)
266%
Read 4K Q8T8
526.7
749.95
42%
1282 (527 - 1620, n=9)
143%
AS SSD
-146%
-58%
-25%
-37%
-4%
-8%
Copy Game MB/s
875.77
676.35
-23%
317.31
-64%
512.25
-42%
971.31
11%
973 (547 - 1554, n=31)
11%
Copy Program MB/s
273.15
143.11
-48%
226.89
-17%
237.29
-13%
630.57
131%
415 (206 - 713, n=31)
52%
Copy ISO MB/s
1941.09
984.55
-49%
512.19
-74%
760.7
-61%
1373.65
-29%
1633 (917 - 3259, n=31)
-16%
Score Total
3462
1225
-65%
1469
-58%
2257
-35%
2105
-39%
3569
3%
3959 (2348 - 5316, n=41)
14%
Score Write
1042
280
-73%
544
-48%
794
-24%
770
-26%
823
-21%
1745 (147 - 2992, n=41)
67%
Score Read
1638
644
-61%
642
-61%
1008
-38%
917
-44%
1833
12%
1471 (896 - 2125, n=41)
-10%
Access Time Write *
0.029
0.3
-934%
0.053
-83%
0.032
-10%
0.041
-41%
0.037
-28%
0.1014 (0.026 - 2.52, n=41)
-250%
Access Time Read *
0.04
0.213
-433%
0.082
-105%
0.041
-3%
0.063
-58%
0.051
-28%
0.0494 (0.029 - 0.073, n=41)
-24%
4K-64 Write
767.22
171.3
-78%
411.22
-46%
596.93
-22%
596.11
-22%
605.28
-21%
1480 (96.2 - 2716, n=41)
93%
4K-64 Read
1316.36
494.14
-62%
472.74
-64%
740.67
-44%
669.32
-49%
1620.84
23%
1229 (664 - 1823, n=41)
-7%
4K Write
142.48
68.95
-52%
102.69
-28%
112.23
-21%
91.09
-36%
95.93
-33%
107 (1.76 - 142, n=41)
-25%
4K Read
56.79
34.42
-39%
30.97
-45%
42.48
-25%
41.45
-27%
42.69
-25%
49.7 (31.7 - 61, n=41)
-12%
Seq Write
1327.81
393.6
-70%
302.06
-77%
847
-36%
831.85
-37%
1213.77
-9%
1581 (487 - 1991, n=41)
19%
Seq Read
2650.04
1154.2
-56%
1385.48
-48%
2243
-15%
2062.08
-22%
1692.57
-36%
1922 (1049 - 2806, n=41)
-27%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-93% / -107%
-43% / -47%
-14% / -15%
-27% / -29%
-11% / -9%
18% / 13%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Sequential Read: 2465 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1856 MB/s
512K Read: 1739 MB/s
512K Write: 1840 MB/s
4K Read: 50.39 MB/s
4K Write: 89.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 202.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 262.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
1977 Points ∼100% +67%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1812 Points ∼92% +53%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1660 Points ∼84% +40%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1660 Points ∼84% +40%
Average of class Convertible
  (173 - 7483, n=320)
1231 Points ∼62% +4%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
1185 Points ∼60%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (1088 - 1257, n=3)
1177 Points ∼60% -1%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
1088 Points ∼55% -8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Convertible
  (85 - 1682, n=28)
464 Points ∼100% +61%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
347 Points ∼75% +20%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
335 Points ∼72% +16%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
289 Points ∼62%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (226 - 289, n=2)
258 Points ∼56% -11%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
226 Points ∼49% -22%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1189 Points ∼100% +23%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1185 Points ∼100% +23%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
1131 Points ∼95% +17%
Average of class Convertible
  (132 - 5965, n=229)
991 Points ∼83% +3%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
964 Points ∼81%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (733 - 964, n=3)
839 Points ∼71% -13%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
733 Points ∼62% -24%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U
10213 Points ∼100% +35%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
9307 Points ∼91% +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9133 Points ∼89% +21%
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8350U
8330 Points ∼82% +10%
VAIO A12-92993
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
7568 Points ∼74%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (6602 - 7568, n=3)
6954 Points ∼68% -8%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, Intel Core i7-8500Y
6692 Points ∼66% -12%
Average of class Convertible
  (1023 - 37388, n=281)
6618 Points ∼65% -13%
3DMark 11 Performance
1291 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
41219 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5622 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
858 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
420 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
328 pontos
Ajuda
Carga Máxima
 28.6 °C37.7 °C40 °C 
 28.7 °C37.3 °C42 °C 
 31.3 °C39.9 °C42.4 °C 
Máximo: 42.4 °C
Médio: 36.4 °C
42.4 °C40.8 °C27.4 °C
47.1 °C43.1 °C28.3 °C
44.8 °C42 °C29.2 °C
Máximo: 47.1 °C
Médio: 38.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  31.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 19.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-13.4 °C / -24.1 F).
VAIO A12-92993
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Heat
-9%
-15%
-7%
-21%
-18%
Maximum Upper Side *
42.4
40.4
5%
44.4
-5%
44.3
-4%
49.4
-17%
44.2
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
47.1
43.8
7%
52
-10%
48.9
-4%
47.1
-0%
48.2
-2%
Idle Upper Side *
26.6
33.5
-26%
32
-20%
30
-13%
38
-43%
33
-24%
Idle Bottom *
24.9
30.2
-21%
31.2
-25%
26.6
-7%
30.8
-24%
35.6
-43%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.331.12527.225.63128.728.24027.429.95025.329.76323.2268022.422.310022.522.612521.823.216021.822.420021.622.325021.123.731520.526.24002033.75001940.463019.346.880019.149.4100018.357.8125017.358.6160016.764.2200016.562.8250016.162.9315015.661.1400015.861.5500015.864.3630015.669.9800015.463.71000015.452.81250015.344.81600015.235.4SPL29.274.8N1.229.8median 17.3median 49.4Delta2.415.83539.234.335.232.336.532.633.131.933.430.231.929.831.128.929.928.228.127.53127.336.927.145.427.150.12652.225.258.924.757.824.158.623.958.823.667.523.668.323.364.623.265.423.163.422.963.322.957.923.157.922.953.622.761.122.664.622.660.435.775.52.533.6median 23.6median 58.62.18.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVAIO A12-92993HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
VAIO A12-92993 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (45.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.32 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.41 / 1.1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.4 / 6.5 / 7.1 Watt
Carga midlight 20.2 / 28 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
VAIO A12-92993
8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ512G, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
 
Average of class Convertible
 
Power Consumption
-29%
-28%
-63%
-38%
4%
7%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
4.4
3.2
27%
3
32%
4.8
-9%
4.9
-11%
1.8
59%
3.03 (1.8 - 4.4, n=3)
31%
4.69 (1 - 23, n=367)
-7%
Idle Average *
6.5
8.7
-34%
7.2
-11%
9
-38%
8.9
-37%
3.8
42%
5.03 (3.8 - 6.5, n=3)
23%
7.85 (1.3 - 32.3, n=367)
-21%
Idle Maximum *
7.1
10.4
-46%
10
-41%
10.5
-48%
11
-55%
7.7
-8%
7.43 (7.1 - 7.7, n=3)
-5%
9.36 (1.8 - 61, n=367)
-32%
Load Average *
20.2
29.2
-45%
37.1
-84%
42.8
-112%
32
-58%
26.9
-33%
21.3 (16.9 - 26.9, n=3)
-5%
26.3 (1.4 - 94, n=365)
-30%
Load Maximum *
28
40.8
-46%
38.2
-36%
57.8
-106%
36
-29%
38.5
-38%
30.1 (23.8 - 38.5, n=3)
-8%
31.3 (6.8 - 117, n=366)
-12%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
8h 34min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge: 44.17763.1.0)
7h 11min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 43min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 37min
VAIO A12-92993
8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, 23.4 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i7, 512 GB
8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet G3-20KJ001NGE
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
HP Elite x2 1013 G3-2TT14EA
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, 54.28 Wh
Average of class Convertible
 
Battery Runtime
55%
-22%
42%
43%
161%
51%
Reader / Idle
514
1083
111%
790
54%
781
52%
1882
266%
764 (117 - 1985, n=287)
49%
H.264
223
523
135%
389
74%
446 (206 - 1070, n=110)
100%
WiFi v1.3
431
509
18%
300
-30%
395
-8%
459
6%
852
98%
453 (153 - 1010, n=241)
5%
Load
97
131
35%
84
-13%
83
-14%
137
41%
212
119%
146 (49 - 677, n=278)
51%

Pro

+ Desempenho comparativamente bom do sistema
+ SSD NVMe veloz
+ 512 GB de armazenamento
+ 16 GB de RAM
+ Leitor de digitais
+ Câmera IV
+ Base de teclado e caneta ativa incluída
+ Teclado iluminado
+ Módulo LTE

Contra

- Caro
- Base de teclado com sensação barata
- Baixa cobertura do espaço de cores
- Brilho fraco da tela
- Carcaça flexível
- Bateria pequena
- Alto falantes abaixo da média
- Posicionamento estranho do carregador
- Lento leitor de cartões SD
The VAIO A12 convertible review. Test device courtesy of Cyberport.
The VAIO A12 convertible review. Test device courtesy of Cyberport.

O VAIO A12 é uma espécie de enigma. O preço é muito alto e tem inúmeros inconvenientes, embora o VAIO seja bom em algumas áreas.

O processador da série Y é mais eficiente em termos energéticos do que os seus homólogos da série U e ainda é poderoso o suficiente para o trabalho de escritório diário. No entanto, a CPU dual-core atingirá seus limites em programas que exigem muitos recursos. Os 16 GB de RAM parecem um exagero aqui, no entanto, os recebem muito bem, e o SSD de 512 GB também. No geral, não tivemos problemas de desempenho inesperados, e o A12 até nos surpreendeu com comparativamente boas pontuações nos benchmarks de desempenho do sistema.

O VAIO A12 é simplesmente muito caro. Não oferece nada que seus concorrentes não possam fazer melhor e também tem uma série de problemas. Procure outra coisa e poupe algum dinheiro

O A12 também tem a aparência de deve ser um dispositivo robusto com seu design grosso e o uso de materiais premium, mas ocorre o oposto. O tablet se flexiona muito facilmente para o nosso gosto e o dock de teclado se curva no meio ao digitar. Da mesma forma, apreciamos que a VAIO tenha equipado o A12 com um leitor de cartão SD em tamanho completo, mas a decisão de incluir um USB 2.0 em um dispositivo tão caro é desconcertante.

Em última análise, não seriamos tão duros com o A12 se fosse mais barato. Poderíamos perdoar um dispositivo por ter uma tela fraca, uma bateria pequena, alto-falantes abaixo da média e portas mal pensadas se fosse uma barganha, mas nenhuma que custasse € 2.799 (~$3148). O Surface Pro 6 não tem nenhum dos problemas que o A12 traz, tem uma CPU mais potente e é quase € 800 (~$900) mais barato também.

Em suma, o A12 está muito aquém das nossas expectativas, e pouco faz para justificar o seu preço alto. Embora o VAIO A12 tenha recebido respeitáveis 82% no geral, recomendamos que você considere um de seus concorrentes: você gastará menos e obterá um dispositivo melhor.

VAIO A12-92993 - 05/02/2019 v6
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento
74 / 98 → 76%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
63 / 80 → 79%
Peso
74 / 35-78 → 90%
Bateria
81%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
55 / 68 → 80%
Desempenho da aplicação
85 / 87 → 98%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
100%
Audio
46 / 91 → 51%
Camera
42 / 85 → 50%
Médio
74%
84%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível VAIO A12 (Core i7-8500Y, 16 GB RAM, SSD de 512 GB, FHD)
Sebastian Bade, 2019-05- 2 (Update: 2019-05- 4)