Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Conversível Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 (i5-8350U)

Surface Pro Pro? O Latitude 5290 busca ser um Surface Pro para profissionais empresariais. Equipado com um SoC Intel de 8va geração, SSD NVMe, e uma tela táctil brilhante e viva, será que este conversível de $1.932 pode ser convincente por seu valor como ativo de negócios?

Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 (Latitude 5290 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-8350U
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Análises do: 300-1100 MHz, 22.20.16.4815
Memória
8192 MB 
, LPDDR3
Pantalha
12.3 polegadas 3:2, 1920 x 1280 pixel 179 PPI, yes; 10-point multi-touch, native pen support, SHP1479, IPS, Brilhante: sim, detachable screen
placa mãe
Intel Sunrise Point-LP
Disco rígido
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, 256 GB 
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo audio, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 9.75 x 292 x 210
Bateria
42 Wh, 5250 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, side edge-mounted, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.278 kg, Suprimento de energia: 254 g

 

Top: Power button
Top: Power button
Bottom: Docking connector
Bottom: Docking connector
Left: audio/headset, volume rocker, USB 3.1 Gen 1 powershare, 2x USB Type-C/DisplayPort/charging port
Left: audio/headset, volume rocker, USB 3.1 Gen 1 powershare, 2x USB Type-C/DisplayPort/charging port
Right: Kensington Lock, smart card, Windows button
Right: Kensington Lock, smart card, Windows button
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
142.2 MB/s ∼100%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.8 MB/s ∼56% -44%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72.62 MB/s ∼51% -49%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
  (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2)
64 MB/s ∼45% -55%
Average of class Office
  (16.5 - 191, n=202)
61.4 MB/s ∼43% -57%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB)
53.8 MB/s ∼38% -62%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
211.8 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
93.77 MB/s ∼44% -56%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
87.4 MB/s ∼41% -59%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
  (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2)
86.9 MB/s ∼41% -59%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB)
86.5 MB/s ∼41% -59%
Average of class Office
  (9.5 - 255, n=181)
79.1 MB/s ∼37% -63%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
653 MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
586 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
569 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Average of class Office
  (5 - 688, n=136)
469 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
312 MBit/s ∼48% -52%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
446 MBit/s ∼100% +46%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
440 MBit/s ∼99% +44%
Average of class Office
  (34 - 688, n=136)
431 MBit/s ∼97% +41%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
305 MBit/s ∼68%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
246 MBit/s ∼55% -19%
563.9
cd/m²
554.8
cd/m²
589.3
cd/m²
530.4
cd/m²
548
cd/m²
546.5
cd/m²
524.1
cd/m²
504
cd/m²
543.7
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 589.3 cd/m² Médio: 545 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 548 cd/m²
Contraste: 1075:1 (Preto: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.65 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 1.81
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 65.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.154
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
SHP1479, IPS, 12.3, 1920x1280
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
BOE06DC, IPS, 12.3, 1920x1280
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
LG Display LP123WQ112604, IPS, 12.3, 2736x1824
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Samsung SDC4A49, IPS, 12.3, 2716x1824
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
LSN120QL01L01, IPS, 12, 2160x1440
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 12.5, 1920x1080
Response Times
-17%
387%
25%
-0%
-4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
56.8 (26.8, 30)
42.4 (20.4, 22)
25%
37 (16, 21)
35%
45.6 (23.6, 22)
20%
28.4 (15.2, 13.2)
50%
61 (28, 33)
-7%
Response Time Black / White *
36 (19.6, 16.4)
30.8 (18, 12.8)
14%
25 (13, 12)
31%
21.6 (9.2, 12.4)
40%
22.8 (13.6, 9.2)
37%
36 (7, 29)
-0%
PWM Frequency
1852 (98)
210.1 (99)
-89%
22130 (55)
1095%
2119 (50)
14%
221.2 (49)
-88%
Screen
-1%
-1%
10%
-14%
-49%
Brightness middle
548
523.2
-5%
482
-12%
443
-19%
388.1
-29%
354
-35%
Brightness
545
522
-4%
466
-14%
446
-18%
344
-37%
330
-39%
Brightness Distribution
86
88
2%
92
7%
88
2%
78
-9%
86
0%
Black Level *
0.51
0.42
18%
0.395
23%
0.41
20%
0.39
24%
0.63
-24%
Contrast
1075
1246
16%
1220
13%
1080
0%
995
-7%
562
-48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.65
4
-10%
4
-10%
2.6
29%
4.6
-26%
8.28
-127%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.15
8.6
-20%
7.2
-1%
4
44%
9.1
-27%
12.71
-78%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.81
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.5
5.5
-0%
5.7
-4%
3
45%
6.1
-11%
9.15
-66%
Gamma
2.154 111%
2.16 111%
2.28 105%
2.38 101%
2.07 116%
2.73 88%
CCT
7052 92%
7546 86%
7950 82%
6780 96%
7104 91%
5953 109%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
65.2
64.86
-1%
62
-5%
62.6
-4%
59
-10%
40
-39%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.1
93.97
-5%
96
-3%
98
-1%
91
-8%
63
-36%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-9% / -5%
193% / 89%
18% / 13%
-7% / -11%
-27% / -42%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.8 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1852 Hz ≤ 98 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1852 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 98 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1852 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10727 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
ComputeMark
ComputeMark
Octane v2
Octane v2
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
163 Points ∼79% +8%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
152 Points ∼74% +1%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
151 Points ∼73%
Average Intel Core i5-8350U
  (142 - 153, n=5)
150 Points ∼73% -1%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Core i5-7200U
127 Points ∼62% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
115 Points ∼56% -24%
Average of class Office
  (20 - 178, n=442)
106 Points ∼51% -30%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
Intel Core m7-6Y75
99 Points ∼48% -34%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i5-8350U
  (501 - 625, n=5)
562 Points ∼19% +9%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
514 Points ∼17%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
410 (min: 335.35, max: 409.45) Points ∼14% -20%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
329 Points ∼11% -36%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Core i5-7200U
322 Points ∼11% -37%
Average of class Office
  (36 - 736, n=446)
301 Points ∼10% -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
234 Points ∼8% -54%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
Intel Core m7-6Y75
180 Points ∼6% -65%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
1.89 Points ∼81% +11%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
1.76 Points ∼75% +3%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
1.71 Points ∼73%
Average Intel Core i5-8350U
  (1.62 - 1.71, n=2)
1.665 Points ∼71% -3%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.47 Points ∼63% -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
1.32 Points ∼56% -23%
Average of class Office
  (0.23 - 2.04, n=411)
1.113 Points ∼48% -35%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i5-8350U
  (5.95 - 7.33, n=2)
6.64 Points ∼28% +12%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
5.95 Points ∼25%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
4.55 Points ∼19% -24%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
3.62 Points ∼15% -39%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.6 Points ∼15% -39%
Average of class Office
  (0.26 - 8.16, n=583)
2.67 Points ∼11% -55%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
2.57 Points ∼11% -57%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Average of class Office
  (206 - 4269, n=378)
847 s * ∼10% -177%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
761.49 s * ∼9% -149%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
545.624 s * ∼6% -78%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
438 s * ∼5% -43%
Average Intel Core i5-8350U
  (306 - 355, n=2)
330 s * ∼4% -8%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
305.731 s * ∼4%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Average Intel Core i5-8350U
  (10 - 6617, n=8)
1727 Seconds * ∼8% -198%
Average of class Office
  (-1 - 107890, n=5948)
1573 Seconds * ∼7% -171%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7600U
688.22 Seconds * ∼3% -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
669 Seconds * ∼3% -15%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel Core i5-8350U
580 Seconds * ∼3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.71 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
5.95 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
41.34 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
151 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
514 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
48.37 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Ajuda
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4764 - 4906, n=4)
4803 Points ∼74% +1%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4764 Points ∼73%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
4431 Points ∼68% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4288 Points ∼66% -10%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
4060 Points ∼62% -15%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4036 Points ∼62% -15%
Average of class Office
  (1226 - 5200, n=279)
3895 Points ∼60% -18%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3510 Points ∼54% -26%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
5540 Points ∼58% +12%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
4961 Points ∼52%
Average Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
4961 Points ∼52% 0%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4602 Points ∼48% -7%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4412 Points ∼46% -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3924 Points ∼41% -21%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
3513 Points ∼37% -29%
Average of class Office
  (869 - 5275, n=222)
3306 Points ∼35% -33%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4741 Points ∼78% +26%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
4095 Points ∼67% +8%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
3776 Points ∼62%
Average Intel Core i5-8350U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3600 - 3776, n=4)
3699 Points ∼61% -2%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3289 Points ∼54% -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3092 Points ∼51% -18%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
3068 Points ∼50% -19%
Average of class Office
  (1169 - 4458, n=320)
2972 Points ∼49% -21%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3776 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4961 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4764 pontos
Ajuda
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Average Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
 
AS SSD
-239%
-1002%
108%
-27%
Copy Game MB/s
317.31
585.49
85%
582
83%
379.9
20%
367 (251 - 742, n=10)
16%
Copy Program MB/s
226.89
286.48
26%
386
70%
198.18
-13%
230 (168 - 325, n=10)
1%
Copy ISO MB/s
512.19
1145.66
124%
1036
102%
790.63
54%
545 (319 - 1146, n=10)
6%
Score Total
1469
2760
88%
1774
21%
4653
217%
1424 (815 - 2437, n=11)
-3%
Score Write
544
150
-72%
52
-90%
879
62%
502 (71 - 1135, n=11)
-8%
Score Read
642
1768
175%
1164
81%
2545
296%
649 (531 - 894, n=11)
1%
Access Time Write *
0.053
2.08
-3825%
7.6
-14240%
0.027
49%
0.2422 (0.038 - 2.15, n=11)
-357%
Access Time Read *
0.082
0.06
27%
0.04
51%
0.041
50%
0.1298 (0.063 - 0.321, n=11)
-58%
4K-64 Write
411.22
126.09
-69%
34
-92%
657.04
60%
370 (52.3 - 937, n=11)
-10%
4K-64 Read
472.74
1607.49
240%
1015
115%
2279.57
382%
450 (337 - 657, n=11)
-5%
4K Write
102.69
1.23
-99%
0.2
-100%
132.2
29%
92.4 (1.94 - 120, n=11)
-10%
4K Read
30.97
27.6
-11%
41
32%
45.24
46%
28 (11.9 - 34.1, n=11)
-10%
Seq Write
302.06
223.08
-26%
171
-43%
897.45
197%
397 (166 - 907, n=11)
31%
Seq Read
1385.48
1328.03
-4%
1070
-23%
2197.21
59%
1712 (1277 - 2392, n=11)
24%

* ... smaller is better

Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1779 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 358.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 387 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 353.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1463 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 359.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 32.66 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 121.7 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
2184 Points ∼12% +40%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8350U
1556 Points ∼9%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1490 Points ∼8% -4%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (959 - 1891, n=72)
1463 Points ∼8% -6%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1414 Points ∼8% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y54
1121 Points ∼6% -28%
Average of class Office
  (169 - 4566, n=564)
1079 Points ∼6% -31%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75
836 Points ∼5% -46%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
2493 Points ∼5% +50%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8350U
1660 Points ∼3%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1366 - 1915, n=72)
1651 Points ∼3% -1%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1589 Points ∼3% -4%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
1510 Points ∼3% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y54
1161 Points ∼2% -30%
Average of class Office
  (185 - 4967, n=565)
1159 Points ∼2% -30%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75
911 Points ∼2% -45%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
1418 Points ∼3% +20%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8350U
1185 Points ∼3%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
1084 Points ∼3% -9%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (819 - 1336, n=65)
1063 Points ∼3% -10%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
933 Points ∼2% -21%
Average of class Office
  (138 - 4109, n=403)
889 Points ∼2% -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y54
728 Points ∼2% -39%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U
11264 Points ∼6% +21%
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8350U
9307 Points ∼5%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
8850 Points ∼5% -5%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 10493, n=67)
8642 Points ∼5% -7%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
7334 Points ∼4% -21%
Average of class Office
  (1208 - 27117, n=447)
6282 Points ∼3% -33%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, 7Y54
6164 Points ∼3% -34%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8350U
47682 Points ∼7%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (30939 - 55131, n=24)
44335 Points ∼6% -7%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7600U
41229 Points ∼6% -14%
Average of class Office
  (8473 - 86732, n=108)
39047 Points ∼5% -18%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7200U
38106 Points ∼5% -20%
3DMark 06 Standard
10387 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
1847 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
66347 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
8236 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1086 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
517 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
398 pontos
Ajuda
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
9 fps ∼3%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
9 fps ∼3% 0%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
7.5 fps ∼3% -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6 fps ∼2% -33%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
4.3 fps ∼2% -52%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6.2 - 11, n=60)
8.64 fps ∼3% -4%
Average of class Office
  (5.3 - 39.6, n=183)
9.6 fps ∼4% +7%
1366x768 High Preset (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
28 fps ∼9%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
28.6 fps ∼9% +2%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
25.2 fps ∼8% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
19 fps ∼6% -32%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
16.2 fps ∼5% -42%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (15.6 - 34.3, n=64)
25.5 fps ∼8% -9%
Average of class Office
  (12.9 - 107, n=277)
24.6 fps ∼8% -12%
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
34 fps ∼10%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
32.8 fps ∼9% -4%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
30.5 fps ∼9% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
21 fps ∼6% -38%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
18.8 fps ∼5% -45%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (19.8 - 40.4, n=64)
30.6 fps ∼9% -10%
Average of class Office
  (9.11 - 119, n=297)
28.3 fps ∼8% -17%
1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
60 fps ∼15%
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
56.5 fps ∼14% -6%
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
52.9 fps ∼13% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
42 fps ∼11% -30%
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
35.6 fps ∼9% -41%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (32.6 - 80.3, n=64)
56 fps ∼14% -7%
Average of class Office
  (12.2 - 185, n=292)
49.5 fps ∼12% -17%
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 6034289fps

Barulho

Ocioso
28.5 / 28.5 / 28.5 dB
Carga
28.5 / 41.6 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.5 dB(A)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, 8350U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
HD Graphics 620, 7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
HD Graphics 620, 7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Noise
3%
-3%
-0%
off / environment *
28.5
28.2
1%
29.6
-4%
29.5
-4%
Idle Minimum *
28.5
28.2
1%
29.6
-4%
29.5
-4%
Idle Average *
28.5
28.2
1%
29.6
-4%
29.5
-4%
Idle Maximum *
28.5
28.2
1%
29.6
-4%
29.5
-4%
Load Average *
28.5
30.4
-7%
33.4
-17%
30.6
-7%
Load Maximum *
41.6
34
18%
34.1
18%
32.5
22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
33.4

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 34.4 °C44.4 °C30.6 °C 
 32.4 °C33.8 °C25.2 °C 
 29 °C28.8 °C27.4 °C 
Máximo: 44.4 °C
Médio: 31.8 °C
28.6 °C52 °C47 °C
29.8 °C44.2 °C42.6 °C
30 °C33.8 °C35.6 °C
Máximo: 52 °C
Médio: 38.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  32 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.2 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
The maximum temp on the upper side is 44.4 °C, compared to the average of 35.9 °C ranging from 21.1 °C to 71 °C for class Office.
Speaker output
Speaker output
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.736.534.7253433.7343134.633.234.64034.333.734.35031.931.631.96331.131.531.18032.43032.410035.829.735.812535.728.535.716047.127.947.120049.526.949.525050.426.850.431551.126.151.140055.124.755.150061.624.761.663063.324.163.380062.623.862.610006623.466125066.523.466.5160063.522.963.5200057.422.757.4250054.422.354.4315058.322.358.3400064.422.364.4500065.522.265.5630065.42265.4800062.522.262.51000061.122.261.11250057.422.257.41600060.522.460.5SPL75.135.175.1N362.436median 60.5Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1median 23.4median 60.5Delta6.31.76.3292728.527.526.725.124.525.626.22622.723.822.225.121.723.520.22419.122.918.325.516.63116.338.716.342.115.840.215.243.915.751.116.25216.351.517.350.617.952.11854.91862.918.266.418.3621855.217.848.817.443.716.945.416.449.129.5711.221.3median 17.4HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EAmedian 48.817hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.14 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (16.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.29 / 0.57 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 3 / 7.2 / 10 Watt
Carga midlight 37.1 / 38.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2716x1824, 12.3
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2160x1440, 12
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5
Power Consumption
11%
-22%
-19%
13%
18%
Idle Minimum *
3
2.85
5%
4.2
-40%
4.1
-37%
5
-67%
4.3
-43%
Idle Average *
7.2
6.76
6%
10.1
-40%
9.2
-28%
6.3
12%
6.1
15%
Idle Maximum *
10
6.91
31%
14
-40%
11.1
-11%
7.8
22%
8.9
11%
Load Average *
37.1
32.88
11%
37.4
-1%
33.8
9%
19.5
47%
16.3
56%
Load Maximum *
38.2
37.41
2%
34
11%
49.2
-29%
19.6
49%
18.6
51%
Witcher 3 ultra *
38.1

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 00min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 24min
Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1
8350U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1
7600U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 45 Wh
HP Elite x2 1012 G2-1LV76EA
7200U, HD Graphics 620, 47 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 37 Wh
Toshiba Portege Z20t-C-121
6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 72 Wh
Battery Runtime
44%
48%
45%
54%
168%
WiFi v1.3
300
486
62%
489
63%
378
26%
441
47%
804
168%
Load
84
105
25%
112
33%
138
64%
134
60%
Witcher 3 ultra
115

Pro

+ Excelente qualidade de construção
+ Boa seleção de portas para sua classe
+ Tela extremamente brilhante com boas cores e contraste
+ Opções de segurança robustas
+ Desempenho potente da GPU
+ Extremamente silencioso sob condições normais
+ Manutenção relativamente simples
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Bons alto falantes
+ Armazenamento duplo possível graças ao slot SSD M.2 2230/WWAN livre

Contra

- Altas temperaturas sob carga (superfície e interna)
- Garantia padrão curta
- Duração pobre da bateria
- Sem Thunderbolt
- Desconfortável no colo
- Bastante caro
The Latitude 5290 2-in-1
The Latitude 5290 2-in-1

De muitas maneiras, o 2-em-um Latitude 5290 é o Surface Pro para o mundo dos negócios. Tudo, desde sua aparência discreta, manutenção relativamente conveniente, opções de segurança robustas, operação silenciosa e seleção de portas acima da média se ajusta perfeitamente aos requisitos diários do escritório. Além de tudo isso, ainda colhemos os benefícios de uma construção de liga de magnésio extremamente robusta, uma tela extremamente brilhante e vívida, desempenho de CPU muito veloz e um bom teclado/touchpad (no acessório Teclado de Viagem de US $ 150, vendido separadamente). Finalmente, o Active Pen ($60) opcional da Dell satisfaz as demandas de um subconjunto exclusivo de usuários que precisam de uma entrada precisa da caneta ativa sensível à pressão da Wacom.

De muitas maneiras, o 2-em-1 Latitude 5290 é o Surface Pro para o mundo dos negócios; sua combinação cuidadosa de luxo de nível de consumidor e sensibilidade de nível empresarial contribuem a um conversível exclusivo que atende a um conjunto muito específico de requisitos.

Mas não há dispositivos perfeitos e o Latitude 5290 vem com sua parcela de compromissos notáveis. A principal delas é a duração da bateria, em que o Latitude cai drasticamente atrás de alguns concorrentes recentes que usam SoCs Kaby Lake. Ele também é sobrecarregado por altas temperaturas de operação (superficiais e internas) sob uso intenso, embora o calor tenha sido redistribuído um pouco para longe das bordas do dispositivo (onde as mãos normalmente descansariam). A garantia padrão é decepcionantemente curta para um dispositivo com um preço tão significativo. A falta de Thunderbolt provavelmente irritará alguns usuários que desejam soluções docking versáteis. E, finalmente, voltando ao preço alto mencionado: $1.932 para a configuração atual (que, para ser justo, inclui pelo menos a capa do Travel Keyboard e o Active Pen).

Os principais concorrentes continuam sendo o Latitude 5285 do ano passado (que, pelo menos oferece uma melhor duração de bateria que o 5290), o Microsoft Surface Pro 2017 (que é muito bom no geral, mas impossível de atualizar e manter desde uma perspectiva de hardware), o HP Elite x2 1012 G2 (que é um dispositivo muito completo, mas notavelmente mais difícil de manter), e o Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (que é um bom concorrente, mas prejudicado pelas restrições do resfriamento passivo e outros aborrecimentos, como o PWM). Todos esses dispositivos apresentam seus próprios conjuntos de pontos fortes e fracos, por isso, antes de decidir sobre um conversível empresarial, sugerimos fortemente que você analise todos eles. No entanto, desde que a funcionalidade 2-em-1 (e talvez as entradas da caneta sensível à pressão) seja uma necessidade absoluta, há poucos dispositivos que gerenciam um desempenho geral tão forte quanto o Latitude 5290.

Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 - 03/30/2018 v6
Steve Schardein

Acabamento
89 / 98 → 91%
Teclado
92%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
65 / 80 → 81%
Peso
72 / 20-67 → 100%
Bateria
82%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
59 / 68 → 87%
Desempenho da aplicação
87 / 92 → 95%
Temperatura
88%
Ruído
95%
Audio
54%
Camera
58 / 85 → 68%
Médio
78%
89%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível Dell Latitude 5290 2-in-1 (i5-8350U)
Steve Schardein, 2018-04- 2 (Update: 2018-04- 8)