Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Conversível HP Spectre Folio 13 (i5-8500Y)

Timeless leather. A HP está dando um novo giro aos portáteis conversíveis inspirados em câmeras antigas e relógios de pulso. O design exclusivo de couro é premium e clássico, mas seu tamanho, peso e recursos ficam um pouco curtos em comparação com o elegante e moderno Ultrabook de metal.

HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 (Spectre Folio 13 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8500Y
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 24.20.100.6222
Memória
16384 MB 
, soldada, 933.3 MHz, 14-17-17-40, LPDDR3, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
13.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, Capacitiva de 10 pontos, native pen support, AU Optronics AUO572D, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, Cat. 16 eSIM, LTE
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 15.4 x 320 x 235
Bateria
54.28 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: FHD IR
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Quatro alto-falantes Bang & Olufsen, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Caneta WACOM, adaptador USB Type-C para Type-A, detachable leather pen loop, McAfee, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
1.49 kg, Suprimento de energia: 292 g
Preço
1400 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Left: USB Type-C Gen. 1 w/ DisplayPort 1.2, 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: USB Type-C Gen. 1 w/ DisplayPort 1.2, 3.5 mm combo audio
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Right: 2x Thunderbolt 3
Right: 2x Thunderbolt 3
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
617 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
616 MBit/s ∼100%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
580 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
577 (min: 517, max: 605) MBit/s ∼94% -6%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB 81C4
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
640 MBit/s ∼100% +20%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
532 MBit/s ∼83%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
517 (min: 437, max: 572) MBit/s ∼81% -3%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
478 MBit/s ∼75% -10%
405.7
cd/m²
391.8
cd/m²
422.4
cd/m²
389.1
cd/m²
389.8
cd/m²
405.7
cd/m²
371.1
cd/m²
394.2
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 422.4 cd/m² Médio: 395.6 cd/m² Minimum: 21.71 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 389.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 1444:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.72 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 1.25
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 62.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
AU Optronics AUO572D, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
LGD0588, IPS, 13.3, 3840x2160
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
Chi Mei CMN1380, IPS, 13.3, 1920x1080
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
LGPhilips LP123WQ112604, IPS, 12.3, 2736x1834
Apple MacBook Air 2018
APPA039, IPS, 13.3, 2560x1600
Lenovo Yoga C930-13IKB
B139HAN03_0, IPS, 13.9, 1920x1080
Response Times
7%
26%
26%
25%
24%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
52 (24.4, 27.6)
51.6 (25.6, 26)
1%
39.6 (20.8, 18.8)
24%
42 (22, 20)
19%
39.6 (20.8, 18.8)
24%
40.8 (20.4, 20.4)
22%
Response Time Black / White *
37.2 (21.2, 16)
32.4 (16.4, 16)
13%
27.2 (14.8, 12.4)
27%
25 (14, 11)
33%
28 (15.6, 12.4)
25%
27.6 (15.6, 12)
26%
PWM Frequency
26040 (62)
20800 (50)
113600 (75)
Screen
3%
-1%
-15%
16%
-45%
Brightness middle
389.8
329.8
-15%
467.2
20%
463
19%
320
-18%
316
-19%
Brightness
396
318
-20%
445
12%
450
14%
315
-20%
291
-27%
Brightness Distribution
88
74
-16%
91
3%
83
-6%
95
8%
83
-6%
Black Level *
0.27
0.25
7%
0.4
-48%
0.32
-19%
0.29
-7%
0.36
-33%
Contrast
1444
1319
-9%
1168
-19%
1447
0%
1103
-24%
878
-39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.72
2.37
13%
2.41
11%
3.76
-38%
1.2
56%
5.9
-117%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.49
4.08
26%
5.58
-2%
7.35
-34%
3.2
42%
12.9
-135%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.25
1.33
-6%
2.68
-114%
0.5
60%
1.3
-4%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.2
2.8
33%
3.7
12%
3.18
24%
0.8
81%
8.6
-105%
Gamma
2.1 105%
2.145 103%
2.37 93%
2.53 87%
2.2 100%
2.1 105%
CCT
7470 87%
6441 101%
7158 91%
6994 93%
6548 99%
6854 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62.2
67
8%
62.5
0%
59
-5%
62.1
0%
60.7
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98.2
98
0%
99.6
1%
90
-8%
96
-2%
94.5
-4%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
5% / 3%
13% / 3%
6% / -9%
21% / 17%
-11% / -34%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24.4 ms rise
↘ 27.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8929 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280Tooltip
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø220 (212.35-271)
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y, 64 GB eMMC Flash; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø163 (162.13-163.67)
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350, 128 GB eMMC Flash; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø99.3 (96.12-100.08)
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø202 (196.49-249.97)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
Intel Core i7-8650U
163 Points ∼75% +23%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Core i7-8550U
149 Points ∼68% +13%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
143 Points ∼66% +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel Core i5-8250U
143 Points ∼66% +8%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
142 Points ∼65% +8%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Intel Core i5-8210Y
132 Points ∼61% 0%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
132 Points ∼61%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7Y75
130 Points ∼60% -2%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
65 Points ∼30% -51%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
Intel Pentium N4200
53 Points ∼24% -60%
HP Stream 14-ax002ng
Intel Celeron N3060
36 Points ∼17% -73%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
31 Points ∼14% -77%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
618 Points ∼14% +128%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel Core i5-8250U
585 Points ∼13% +116%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Core i7-8550U
523 Points ∼12% +93%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
Intel Core i7-8650U
447 Points ∼10% +65%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
317 Points ∼7% +17%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Intel Core i5-8210Y
285 Points ∼7% +5%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
271 Points ∼6%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7Y75
258 Points ∼6% -5%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
Intel Pentium N4200
174 Points ∼4% -36%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
164 Points ∼4% -39%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
100 Points ∼2% -63%
HP Stream 14-ax002ng
Intel Celeron N3060
70 Points ∼2% -74%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.65 Points ∼68% +15%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
1.61 Points ∼66% +13%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7Y75
1.54 Points ∼63% +8%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
1.43 Points ∼59%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
0.75 Points ∼31% -48%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
Intel Pentium N4200
0.64 Points ∼26% -55%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
6.91 Points ∼26% +182%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.53 Points ∼13% +44%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7Y75
2.98 Points ∼11% +22%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
2.45 Points ∼9%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
Intel Pentium N4200
2.02 Points ∼7% -18%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
1.8 Points ∼7% -27%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
5614 Points ∼52% +15%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7Y75
5496 Points ∼51% +12%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
4898 Points ∼45%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
4473 Points ∼41% -9%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
2521 Points ∼23% -49%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
Intel Pentium N4200
1668 Points ∼15% -66%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
16466 Points ∼33% +94%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
11366 Points ∼23% +34%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7Y75
9392 Points ∼19% +11%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
8493 Points ∼17%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
5586 Points ∼11% -34%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
Intel Pentium N4200
4844 Points ∼10% -43%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
981.678 s * ∼12% -46%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
673.184 s * ∼8%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7Y75
618.91 s * ∼7% +8%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
480.096 s * ∼6% +29%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
375.873 s * ∼4% +44%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
1239.78 Seconds * ∼6% -89%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
696.928 Seconds * ∼3% -6%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel Core i7-8500Y
657.406 Seconds * ∼3%
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-7Y75
585.172 Seconds * ∼3% +11%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel Core i7-7500U
569.077 Seconds * ∼3% +13%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8347
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
8493
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4898
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.43 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.45 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
24.24 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
271 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
132 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
44.49 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
2758 Points ∼28% +54%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
2604 Points ∼26% +45%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Liteon CA1-8D256-HP
2548 Points ∼26% +42%
Average of class Convertible
  (727 - 4342, n=71)
2417 Points ∼24% +35%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
1791 Points ∼18%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256
1609 Points ∼16% -10%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
HD Graphics 505, N4200, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006
1021 Points ∼10% -43%
Productivity
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6694 Points ∼69% +17%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5745 Points ∼59%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Liteon CA1-8D256-HP
5253 Points ∼54% -9%
Average of class Convertible
  (1162 - 7045, n=72)
5108 Points ∼53% -11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
4520 Points ∼47% -21%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256
3902 Points ∼40% -32%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
HD Graphics 505, N4200, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006
2535 Points ∼26% -56%
Essentials
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8733 Points ∼82% +30%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Liteon CA1-8D256-HP
7376 Points ∼69% +9%
Average of class Convertible
  (2489 - 9291, n=72)
6781 Points ∼64% +1%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6741 Points ∼63%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
6714 Points ∼63% 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256
4504 Points ∼42% -33%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
HD Graphics 505, N4200, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006
4115 Points ∼39% -39%
Score
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3901 Points ∼50% +32%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Liteon CA1-8D256-HP
3313 Points ∼43% +12%
Average of class Convertible
  (1006 - 4347, n=73)
3081 Points ∼40% +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
3076 Points ∼40% +4%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2945 Points ∼38%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y, Apple SSD AP0256
2174 Points ∼28% -26%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
HD Graphics 505, N4200, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006
1577 Points ∼20% -46%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4406 Points ∼68%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Liteon CA1-8D256-HP
4149 Points ∼64% -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
3970 Points ∼61% -10%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3706 Points ∼57% -16%
Average of class Convertible
  (1007 - 5281, n=203)
3662 Points ∼56% -17%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
HD Graphics 505, N4200, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006
2981 Points ∼46% -32%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Liteon CA1-8D256-HP
4885 Points ∼51%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
4432 Points ∼47%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
4227 Points ∼44%
Average of class Convertible
  (766 - 6165, n=162)
3336 Points ∼35%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
HD Graphics 505, N4200, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006
2512 Points ∼26%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
UHD Graphics 620, 8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4103 Points ∼67% +50%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
UHD Graphics 620, 8550U, Liteon CA1-8D256-HP
3306 Points ∼54% +21%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
UHD Graphics 620, 8250U, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
3088 Points ∼51% +13%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
3023 Points ∼50% +10%
Average of class Convertible
  (741 - 4741, n=250)
2743 Points ∼45% 0%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
2737 Points ∼45%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
HD Graphics 505, N4200, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006
2140 Points ∼35% -22%
HP Stream 14-ax002ng
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, SanDisk DF4032
1760 Points ∼29% -36%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y, 64 GB eMMC Flash
741 Points ∼12% -73%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2737 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4406 pontos
Ajuda
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
64 GB eMMC Flash
HP Stream 14-ax002ng
SanDisk DF4032
AS SSD
8%
-227%
-126%
-346%
Copy Game MB/s
971.31
989.72
2%
124.38
-87%
76.48
-92%
Copy Program MB/s
630.57
453.91
-28%
94
-85%
44.34
-93%
Copy ISO MB/s
1373.65
1947.34
42%
128.13
-91%
99.05
-93%
Score Total
3569
3484
-2%
870
-76%
225
-94%
112
-97%
Score Write
823
1032
25%
244
-70%
92
-89%
25
-97%
Score Read
1833
1634
-11%
430
-77%
88
-95%
56
-97%
Access Time Write *
0.037
0.036
3%
0.301
-714%
0.233
-530%
0.932
-2419%
Access Time Read *
0.051
0.041
20%
0.913
-1690%
0.151
-196%
0.332
-551%
4K-64 Write
605.28
790.01
31%
129.31
-79%
44.48
-93%
6.93
-99%
4K-64 Read
1620.84
1407.92
-13%
277.89
-83%
40.27
-98%
29.14
-98%
4K Write
95.93
104.31
9%
80.6
-16%
35.07
-63%
9.2
-90%
4K Read
42.69
46.05
8%
40.46
-5%
18.29
-57%
12.01
-72%
Seq Write
1213.77
1373.63
13%
340
-72%
126.65
-90%
89.22
-93%
Seq Read
1692.57
1797.58
6%
1113.69
-34%
289.84
-83%
144.79
-91%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
41%
-56%
-80%
-91%
Write 4K
140
120
-14%
68.05
-51%
26.91
-81%
7.611
-95%
Read 4K
52.38
43.42
-17%
30.64
-42%
19.72
-62%
13.21
-75%
Write Seq
947.5
1814
91%
133.8
-86%
126.2
-87%
65.85
-93%
Read Seq
922.1
2227
142%
705.3
-24%
268
-71%
120.6
-87%
Write 4K Q32T1
227.8
391.8
72%
104.4
-54%
62.89
-72%
7.547
-97%
Read 4K Q32T1
299.2
288.7
-4%
196.3
-34%
39.82
-87%
35.25
-88%
Write Seq Q32T1
1259
1860
48%
135.5
-89%
131.3
-90%
61.55
-95%
Read Seq Q32T1
3112
3376
8%
1124
-64%
259.3
-92%
122
-96%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
25% / 20%
-142% / -165%
-103% / -109%
-219% / -238%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3112 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1259 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 299.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 227.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 922.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 947.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 52.38 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 140 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
4296 Points ∼24% +393%
Lenovo Flex 5-1570 81CA000RUS
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8550U
2831 Points ∼16% +225%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2683 Points ∼15% +208%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
1586 Points ∼9% +82%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1555 Points ∼9% +78%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1509 Points ∼8% +73%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y
1134 Points ∼6% +30%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (872 - 1134, n=2)
1003 Points ∼6% +15%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y
872 Points ∼5%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
Intel HD Graphics 505, N4200
592 Points ∼3% -32%
HP Stream 14-ax002ng
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
395 Points ∼2% -55%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
392 Points ∼2% -55%
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
4708 Points ∼9% +333%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
3549 Points ∼7% +226%
Lenovo Flex 5-1570 81CA000RUS
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8550U
2592 Points ∼5% +138%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
1881 Points ∼4% +73%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
1577 Points ∼3% +45%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1569 Points ∼3% +44%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y
1257 Points ∼2% +16%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (1088 - 1257, n=2)
1173 Points ∼2% +8%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y
1088 Points ∼2%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
Intel HD Graphics 505, N4200
725 Points ∼1% -33%
HP Stream 14-ax002ng
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060
381 Points ∼1% -65%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
349 Points ∼1% -68%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
649 Points ∼5% +187%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Intel UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y
286 Points ∼2% +27%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y
226 Points ∼2%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
 
226 Points ∼2% 0%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
Intel HD Graphics 505, N4200
85 Points ∼1% -62%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
3622 Points ∼9% +394%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
2310 Points ∼6% +215%
Lenovo Flex 5-1570 81CA000RUS
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8550U
2149 Points ∼5% +193%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
1064 Points ∼3% +45%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
1029 Points ∼3% +40%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Intel UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y
947 Points ∼2% +29%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y
819 Points ∼2% +12%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (733 - 819, n=2)
776 Points ∼2% +6%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y
733 Points ∼2%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
Intel HD Graphics 505, N4200
482 Points ∼1% -34%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
19900 Points ∼11% +197%
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
15186 Points ∼8% +127%
Lenovo Flex 5-1570 81CA000RUS
NVIDIA GeForce MX130, 8550U
12942 Points ∼7% +93%
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8250U
9769 Points ∼5% +46%
HP Spectre x360 13t-ae000
Intel UHD Graphics 620, 8550U
8112 Points ∼4% +21%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
7636 Points ∼4% +14%
Apple MacBook Air 2018
Intel UHD Graphics 617, 8210Y
7231 Points ∼4% +8%
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 8500Y
6692 Points ∼4%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
  (6602 - 6692, n=2)
6647 Points ∼4% -1%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y
6602 Points ∼4% -1%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
Intel HD Graphics 505, N4200
3598 Points ∼2% -46%
Asus Transformer Book T102HA-GR022T
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8350
2000 Points ∼1% -70%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, 2500U
68150 Points ∼9%
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Intel HD Graphics 620, 7500U
37394 Points ∼5%
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
Intel UHD Graphics 615, 4415Y
35452 Points ∼5%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 615
 
35452 Points ∼5%
HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE Z3A47EA
Intel HD Graphics 505, N4200
20939 Points ∼3%
3DMark 06 Standard
6386 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result
3813 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
1169 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
36523 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4660 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
648 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
257 pontos
Ajuda
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 39.219.818.15.7fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 10.6fps
Rocket League (2017) 33.21610.3fps
Carga Máxima
 40 °C44.2 °C35 °C 
 32 °C31.8 °C28.6 °C 
 28.8 °C26 °C27.6 °C 
Máximo: 44.2 °C
Médio: 32.7 °C
34.8 °C48.2 °C39 °C
32 °C35 °C35.2 °C
30.2 °C31.2 °C31.6 °C
Máximo: 48.2 °C
Médio: 35.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  29.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.4 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.4 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.8 °C / 83.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.2 °C / 84.6 F (+0.4 °C / 0.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203539.22534.335.23132.336.54032.633.15031.933.46330.231.98029.831.110028.929.912528.228.116027.53120027.336.925027.145.431527.150.14002652.250025.258.963024.757.880024.158.6100023.958.8125023.667.5160023.668.3200023.364.6250023.265.4315023.163.4400022.963.3500022.957.9630023.157.9800022.953.61000022.761.11250022.664.61600022.660.4SPL35.775.5N2.533.6median 23.6median 58.6Delta2.18.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.32 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.23 / 0.54 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.8 / 3.8 / 7.7 Watt
Carga midlight 26.9 / 38.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1800x1200, 10
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZPZ128G, IPS, 2736x1834, 12.3
Apple MacBook Air 2018
8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9
Power Consumption
-2%
-79%
-55%
-85%
Idle Minimum *
1.8
2.88
-60%
5.3
-194%
4.3
-139%
3.5
-94%
Idle Average *
3.8
4.8
-26%
9.6
-153%
8.7
-129%
8.9
-134%
Idle Maximum *
7.7
7.5
3%
10.1
-31%
9.4
-22%
12.3
-60%
Load Average *
26.9
16.9
37%
34.4
-28%
24.5
9%
54.2
-101%
Load Maximum *
38.5
23.8
38%
34.8
10%
36
6%
52.1
-35%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42.4

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
31h 22min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 12min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 32min
HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000
8500Y, UHD Graphics 615, 54.28 Wh
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003
4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57.8 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 6, Core i5, 128 GB
8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Apple MacBook Air 2018
8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, 50.3 Wh
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh
Battery Runtime
-40%
-47%
-41%
-15%
-35%
Reader / Idle
1882
771
-59%
792
-58%
1066
-43%
1243
-34%
WiFi v1.3
852
448
-47%
537
-37%
545
-36%
721
-15%
557
-35%
Load
212
180
-15%
114
-46%
118
-44%
133
-37%

Pro

+ O design de couro exclusivo e o formato conversível é ótimo para segurar
+ Tela de alta qualidade; sRGB >95 por cento, relação de alto contraste
+ Tela mais brilhante que a do Spectre x360 13
+ Tanto eSIM e nano-SIM; Gigabit LTE
+ Completamente silencioso; sem ruído eletrônico
+ O exterior não é um imã de digitais
+ Rápido desempenho do SSD da Samsung
+ Desempenho pleno com bateria
+ Duas portas Thunderbolt 3
+ Caneta S-Pen digitalizadora
+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Limitado a CPUs de 5 W; sem opções Kaby Lake-R ou Whiskey Lake-U
- Tempos de resposta lentos da tela; mais ghosting notório
- Capacidade de manutenção difícil; o usuário final não pode fazer upgrades
- Mais pesado e maior que o Spectre x360 13
- Sem USB Type-A, HDMI, RJ-45, ou leitor SD
- Sem Kensington Lock ou leitor de digitais
- Trackpad menor que o do Spectre x360 13
- Baixo desempenho-por-dólar
- O teclado não é à prova de respingos
In review: HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000. Test model provided by HP US
In review: HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000. Test model provided by HP US

A HP criou um nicho confortável com o Spectre Folio. Quando comparado com o Surface Go ou Surface Pro Pro?, o conversível HP oferece conectividade 4G LTE, Thunderbolt 3, duração mais longa da bateria, e uma tela maior que deve atrair usuários empresariais em constante movimento. O exterior de couro trabalha esteticamente e na prática para o agarre e transporte.

Por mais lindo que possa parecer e se sentir, o maior inimigo do Spectre Folio é o Spectre x360 13 porque ambos são conversíveis de 13 polegadas por cerca do mesmo preço de $1.300 a $1.400 USD. O exterior de couro reconhecidamente elegante vem com o custo do tamanho, peso e capacidade de manutenção, pois o Spectre x360 13 é menor, mais leve, mais fino e mais fácil de reparar ou atualizar, se necessário. O Spectre x360 13 é ainda mais rápido que o Spectre Folio devido ao seu processador Kaby Lake-R e, de fato, ele integra tanto o USB Type-A quanto um leitor de cartões SD.

Os usuários que estão considerando o conversível HP revestido de couro devem se apaixonar por seu design e sentir a intenção de explorar seus recursos integrados 4G LTE. Caso contrário, o Spectre x360 13 é a melhor opção pelo dinheiro, pois oferece mais velocidade e recursos do que o Spectre Folio.

Um novo design apto para o trabalho em qualquer cafeteria ou sala de aula. O Spectre Folio combina uma aparência antiga com o mais recente processador Intel Amber Lake-Y e a tecnologia 4G LTE eSIM para maior duração da bateria e conectividade sempre ativa. Se você não é atraído pelo chassi exclusivo, no entanto, outros Ultrabooks tendem a oferecer mais recursos e tamanhos menores.

HP Spectre Folio 13t-ak000 - 11/23/2018 v6
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
84 / 98 → 86%
Teclado
87%
Mouse
83%
Conectividade
51 / 80 → 64%
Peso
69 / 35-78 → 79%
Bateria
97%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
54 / 68 → 79%
Desempenho da aplicação
77 / 87 → 89%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
66 / 85 → 77%
Médio
78%
86%
Convertible - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Conversível HP Spectre Folio 13 (i5-8500Y)
Allen Ngo, 2018-11-24 (Update: 2018-11-28)