C 2018
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil AORUS X7 DT v8 (i7-8850H, GTX 1080, Full HD)

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 07/23/2018

Decolar. O atual AORUS X7 DT é um dos portáteis de jogos mais rápidos do mercado. O novo modelo, o X7 DT v8, vem com um processador hexa-core Coffee Lake da Intel, uma GPU Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 e uma tela de 144 Hz. Descubra nesta análise se a AORUS fez o suficiente para colocar o X7 DT v8 no topo dos portáteis para jogos.

Aorus X7 DT v8 (X7 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8850H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1582 MHz, Memoría: 2500 MHz, GDDR5X, ForceWare 391.34
Memória
16384 MB 
, Dois módulos de 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4 2666, Dual Channel. Dois de quatro slots SO-DIMM ocupados. Máximo de 64 GB RAM suportados.
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, X-Rite Pantone , Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, 512 GB 
, SSD & HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD, 7,200 RPM. Two M.2-2280 slots & one 2.5-inch drive bay.
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: COnector para fones, conector para microfone, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 25 x 428 x 305
Bateria
94.24 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Dois alto-falantes de 2 W, dois woofers de 2 W., Teclado: Chiclet, RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 265 W, memória USB contendo software, Feet, Guia de início rápido, Informação da garantia, Adesivos, Adobe Reader XI, diversas ferramentas da fabricante, Killer Performance Suite, MS Office trial, XSplit Broadcaster trial, XSplit Gamecaster Trial, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
3.374 kg, Suprimento de energia: 638 g
Preço
3100 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Left-hand side: Gigabit Ethernet, 3 x USB 3.1 Type-A Gen 1, headphone jack, microphone jack
Left-hand side: Gigabit Ethernet, 3 x USB 3.1 Type-A Gen 1, headphone jack, microphone jack
Right-hand side: card reader, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen 2, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0, Mini DisplayPort 1.4
Right-hand side: card reader, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen 2, Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0, Mini DisplayPort 1.4
Rear: power connector, USB 3.1 Type-A Gen 2
Rear: power connector, USB 3.1 Type-A Gen 2

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus X7 DT v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
196 MB/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Pro 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
180 MB/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=200)
89.9 MB/s ∼46% -54%
Aorus X7 DT v6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83.25 MB/s ∼42% -58%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
50 MB/s ∼26% -74%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s ∼13% -87%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus X7 DT v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
244 MB/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Pro 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
210 MB/s ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=198)
109 MB/s ∼45% -55%
Aorus X7 DT v6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90.59 MB/s ∼37% -63%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
52 MB/s ∼21% -79%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s ∼13% -87%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
693 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Pro 17
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
687 MBit/s ∼99% +5%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
671 MBit/s ∼97% +2%
Aorus X7 DT v8
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
655 MBit/s ∼95%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
606 MBit/s ∼87% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=169)
594 MBit/s ∼86% -9%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
662 MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Aorus X7 DT v8
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
599 MBit/s ∼90%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
589 MBit/s ∼89% -2%
Schenker XMG Pro 17
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
554 MBit/s ∼84% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=169)
530 MBit/s ∼80% -12%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
528 MBit/s ∼80% -12%
287
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
267
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 306 cd/m² Médio: 280.8 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 297 cd/m²
Contraste: 1291:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.19 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.31 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Aorus X7 DT v8
AU Optronics B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080
Aorus X7 DT v6
AUO1096, TN LED, 2560x1440
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 3840x2160
Alienware 17 R4
TN LED, 2560x1440
Schenker XMG Pro 17
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN WLED, 1920x1080
Response Times
-15%
-229%
-37%
-126%
-35%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
18 (8.8, 9.2)
21.6 (12.4, 9.2)
-20%
60.8 (28.8, 32)
-238%
30 (18.8, 11.2)
-67%
44 (21.2, 22.8)
-144%
28 (16.4, 11.6)
-56%
Response Time Black / White *
12 (6.8, 5.2)
13.2 (4.4, 8.8)
-10%
38.4 (22, 16.4)
-220%
12.8 (10.8, 2)
-7%
24.8 (11.6, 13.2)
-107%
13.6 (11.8, 1.8)
-13%
PWM Frequency
59.52
204.9 (20)
25000 (14)
Screen
-86%
-51%
-69%
-46%
-23%
Brightness middle
297
339.5
14%
230
-23%
402.3
35%
303
2%
273
-8%
Brightness
281
309
10%
207
-26%
372
32%
287
2%
273
-3%
Brightness Distribution
84
80
-5%
83
-1%
86
2%
83
-1%
90
7%
Black Level *
0.23
0.45
-96%
0.2
13%
0.62
-170%
0.25
-9%
0.26
-13%
Contrast
1291
754
-42%
1150
-11%
649
-50%
1212
-6%
1050
-19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.19
6.88
-214%
5.62
-157%
5.6
-156%
4.38
-100%
3.52
-61%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.81
9.99
-108%
10.24
-113%
9.8
-104%
7.42
-54%
6.34
-32%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.31
6.57
-402%
4.54
-247%
4.7
-259%
5.96
-355%
3.11
-137%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.04 108%
2.36 93%
2.14 103%
2.31 95%
2.43 91%
CCT
6464 101%
8608 76%
6625 98%
7519 86%
6247 104%
6999 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
54
-8%
88
49%
53.7
-9%
87
47%
76
29%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
82
-10%
100
10%
82.2
-10%
100
10%
100
10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.09
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-51% / -74%
-140% / -80%
-53% / -64%
-86% / -60%
-29% / -25%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.8 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8689 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 DT v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
182 Points ∼100%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼96% -4%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
171 Points ∼94% -6%
Aorus X7 DT v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
169 Points ∼93% -7%
Schenker XMG Pro 17
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
158 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 207, n=407)
151 Points ∼83% -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X7 DT v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
1276 Points ∼100%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Intel Core i7-8750H
1163 Points ∼91% -9%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
867 Points ∼68% -32%
Aorus X7 DT v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
832 Points ∼65% -35%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
771 Points ∼60% -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1408, n=408)
738 Points ∼58% -42%
Schenker XMG Pro 17
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points ∼57% -43%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 DT v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
2.07 Points ∼100%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points ∼96% -4%
Aorus X7 DT v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.92 Points ∼93% -7%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.81 Points ∼87% -13%
Schenker XMG Pro 17
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.79 Points ∼86% -14%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.69 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.34, n=403)
1.676 Points ∼81% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X7 DT v8
Intel Core i7-8850H
14.02 Points ∼100%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.49 Points ∼89% -11%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.53 Points ∼68% -32%
Aorus X7 DT v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
9.14 Points ∼65% -35%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.39 Points ∼60% -40%
Schenker XMG Pro 17
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.12 Points ∼58% -42%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 15.8, n=504)
7.21 Points ∼51% -49%
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.07 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
14.02 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
182 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1276 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
5465 Points ∼100% +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6620, n=109)
4924 Points ∼90% +9%
Schenker XMG Pro 17
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
4571 Points ∼84% +1%
Aorus X7 DT v8
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4524 Points ∼83%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
3991 Points ∼73% -12%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X7 DT v8
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5779 Points ∼100%
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5096 Points ∼88% -12%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5064 Points ∼88% -12%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
4531 Points ∼78% -22%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4498 Points ∼78% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=322)
4214 Points ∼73% -27%
Schenker XMG Pro 17
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
3635 Points ∼63% -37%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5779 pontos
Ajuda
Aorus X7 DT v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Aorus X7 DT v6
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Razer Blade Pro 2017
2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
Alienware 17 R4
SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
Schenker XMG Pro 17
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
AS SSD
26%
7%
-5%
57%
-63%
Score Total
2539
2695
6%
2715
7%
2072
-18%
4093
61%
881
-65%
Score Write
981
665
-32%
676
-31%
858
-13%
1558
59%
254
-74%
Score Read
1058
1353
28%
1414
34%
831
-21%
1711
62%
417
-61%
4K Write
89.94
149.13
66%
104.44
16%
113.36
26%
154.21
71%
38.34
-57%
4K Read
23.28
48.93
110%
37.57
61%
35.61
53%
45.58
96%
14.07
-40%
Seq Write
1341.67
1493.99
11%
587.97
-56%
734.8
-45%
1672.86
25%
425.71
-68%
Seq Read
2182.48
1971.14
-10%
2599.35
19%
1752.03
-20%
2746.35
26%
511.18
-77%
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2414 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1562 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 366.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 305.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1362 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1340 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 30.76 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 88.55 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X7 DT v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21928 Points ∼100% +5%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21846 Points ∼100% +5%
Aorus X7 DT v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
20813 Points ∼95%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
18879 Points ∼86% -9%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17980 Points ∼82% -14%
Schenker XMG Pro 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17216 Points ∼79% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=436)
10245 Points ∼47% -51%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus X7 DT v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
27135 Points ∼100% +4%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
26438 Points ∼97% +1%
Aorus X7 DT v8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
26201 Points ∼97%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
24868 Points ∼92% -5%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
23261 Points ∼86% -11%
Schenker XMG Pro 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
22804 Points ∼84% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=509)
11830 Points ∼44% -55%
3DMark 11 Performance
20577 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
177420 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
39020 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18006 pontos
Ajuda
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677787980Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
78.1 fps ∼100% +9%
Aorus X7 DT v8
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8850H
71.4 fps ∼91%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
64.9 fps ∼83% -9%
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
62.9 fps ∼81% -12%
Schenker XMG Pro 17
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
61.4 fps ∼79% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=211)
44.9 fps ∼57% -37%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 14171.4fps
The Division (2016) 128100fps
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 130121fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 156141fps
Dishonored 2 (2016) 11596.4fps
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) 10472.8fps
Destiny 2 (2017) 165144fps
The Crew 2 (2018) 6060fps

Barulho

Ocioso
35 / 36 / 41 dB
HDD
33 dB
Carga
43 / 54 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Aorus X7 DT v8
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8850H
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Schenker XMG Pro 17
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
0%
5%
1%
2%
6%
8%
off / environment *
29
28.6
1%
30
-3%
28.2
3%
29
-0%
30
-3%
29.5 (27.7 - 32, n=216)
-2%
Idle Minimum *
35
32.2
8%
30
14%
35.6
-2%
32
9%
32
9%
31.6 (28 - 41.7, n=637)
10%
Idle Average *
36
35.2
2%
31
14%
35.6
1%
33
8%
33
8%
32.8 (28 - 46.6, n=637)
9%
Idle Maximum *
41
35.2
14%
33
20%
35.7
13%
35
15%
34
17%
34.7 (28 - 50.4, n=637)
15%
Load Average *
43
51.7
-20%
43
-0%
50.2
-17%
50
-16%
41
5%
40.4 (30.3 - 58, n=638)
6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53
55
-4%
50.2
5%
52
2%
50
6%
Load Maximum *
54
55.7
-3%
58
-7%
50.2
7%
56
-4%
54
-0%
47.7 (38.9 - 64, n=638)
12%

* ... smaller is better

 45 °C51 °C49 °C 
 43 °C47 °C46 °C 
 39 °C39 °C38 °C 
Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 44.1 °C
63 °C62 °C52 °C
63 °C62 °C53 °C
42 °C43 °C39 °C
Máximo: 63 °C
Médio: 53.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  60 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Aorus X7 DT v8
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8850H
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Schenker XMG Pro 17
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
5%
-13%
0%
4%
-3%
2%
Maximum Upper Side *
51
45.4
11%
53
-4%
49.6
3%
55
-8%
47
8%
45.5 (28 - 68.8, n=602)
11%
Maximum Bottom *
63
58.2
8%
53
16%
56
11%
56
11%
49
22%
49.1 (25.9 - 78, n=600)
22%
Idle Upper Side *
27
27.4
-1%
35
-30%
29.6
-10%
25
7%
32
-19%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=553)
-14%
Idle Bottom *
28
27.2
3%
37
-32%
29.2
-4%
26
7%
34
-21%
31.6 (21.1 - 50.3, n=551)
-13%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.543.4253538.13130.930.94034.536.55027.828.66326.630.98028.643.910028.359.112525.551.516022.74720024.95625023.65731520.660.540019.364.950018.368.463017.772.280017.569100017.876.3125017.474.616001771.8200017.169.1250017.371.6315017.171400017.364.750001766.8630017.169.7800017.265.31000017.263125001758.51600016.951.8SPL29.882.8N1.356.2median 17.4median 65.3Delta1.95.738.440.5323228.431.233.338.136.638.42741.225.848.930.451.524.949.524.957.824.963.424.16822.271.219.869.919.472.119.177.418.975.518.470.618.57018.474.118.472.518.771.619.170.719.166.119.458.719.554.919.755.320.35920.948.120.750.931.583.11.656.2median 19.5median 681.97.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus X7 DT v8Razer Blade Pro 2017
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Aorus X7 DT v8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Razer Blade Pro 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 7.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 1.2 / 1.4 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 23 / 33 / 37 Watt
Carga midlight 115 / 281 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus X7 DT v8
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8850H
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
Schenker XMG Pro 17
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-20%
-7%
-11%
29%
25%
20%
Idle Minimum *
23
31.5
-37%
31
-35%
37.5
-63%
13
43%
15
35%
20.3 (3.9 - 113, n=597)
12%
Idle Average *
33
33.9
-3%
36
-9%
37.6
-14%
19
42%
20
39%
25.9 (6.8 - 119, n=597)
22%
Idle Maximum *
37
34.6
6%
44
-19%
37.6
-2%
26
30%
26
30%
30.9 (8.3 - 122, n=597)
16%
Load Average *
115
205.6
-79%
107
7%
122.4
-6%
95
17%
97
16%
105 (14.1 - 319, n=588)
9%
Load Maximum *
281
250.8
11%
258
8%
277.4
1%
220
22%
239
15%
166 (21.9 - 590, n=587)
41%
Witcher 3 ultra *
225
212
6%
180.3
20%
179
20%
186
17%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
4h 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 48min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 20min
Aorus X7 DT v8
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8850H, 94.24 Wh
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 94 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 99 Wh
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 99 Wh
Schenker XMG Pro 17
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, 66 Wh
MSI GE73 8RF-008 Raider RGB
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, 51 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-19%
-9%
-14%
15%
-23%
6%
Reader / Idle
296
182
-39%
253
-15%
276
-7%
397
34%
303
2%
328 (39 - 1174, n=586)
11%
WiFi v1.3
228
144
-37%
197
-14%
181
-21%
218
-4%
186
-18%
250 (78 - 622, n=262)
10%
Load
80
94
18%
81
1%
69
-14%
91
14%
38
-52%
78.6 (18 - 202, n=554)
-2%
H.264
204
222
193
244 (88 - 506, n=121)

Pro

+ Overclock opcional da CPU e GPU
+ Excelente seleção de portas
+ Veloz leitor de cartões
+ Bom Turbo Boost
+ Carcaça resistente
+ Ferramentas práticas do fabricante
+ Tela de 144 Hz
+ SSD NVMe

Contra

- Altas temperaturas e ruído do sistema
- O interior fica empoeirado rapidamente
- Duração curta da bateria
- Qualidade média dos alto falantes
The AORUS X7 DT v8 in review. Test device courtesy of Gigabyte Germany.
The AORUS X7 DT v8 in review. Test device courtesy of Gigabyte Germany.

O AORUS X7 DT v8 continua a tradição da Gigabyte de produzir portáteis para jogos de alto desempenho e design inteligente.

O X7 DT v8 pontua bem pela sua robusta carcaça de metal, sua seleção decente de dispositivos de entrada e pelo seu alto contraste, 144 Hz, e tela IPS Full HD.

A combinação de uma GPU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M, uma tela de 144 Hz e Nvidia G-Sync garante uma experiência de jogo fluente que pouco portáteis podem alcançar. O processador hexa-core Intel Core i7 2617M deve oferecer muito poder por muitos anos, enquanto os 16 GB de RAM DDR4 e o SSD NVMe garantem que o X7 DT v8 tenha um desempenho fluente, independentemente do aplicativo utilizado.

Esses componentes de alto desempenho vêm com um custo nas temperaturas da superfície, ruído dos ventiladores e duração da bateria. O X7 DT v8 sente-se quente ao toque sob uso intenso, com os ventiladores ficando correspondentemente barulhentos. Esse alto consumo de energia e a falta de tecnologia de comutação de gráficos resultam em uma duração de bateria medíocre, mesmo com a enorme bateria de 94 Wh. A qualidade do alto-falante também é de segunda categoria e deveria ser melhor, dado o preço do X7 DT v8.

No geral, o AORUS X7 DT v8 é um excelente portátil para jogos que merecidamente ficará na nossa lista dos Top 10. A Gigabyte fez apenas o suficiente para que nós avaliemos X7 DT v8 melhor que o GeForce GTX 1080 Alienware 17 R4, e o Razer Blade Pro 4K e o GTX 1070 Schenker XMG Pro 17 e MSI GE73 8RF

Aorus X7 DT v8 - 07/10/2018 v6
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
82 / 98 → 83%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
71 / 81 → 88%
Peso
54 / 10-66 → 79%
Bateria
74%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
99%
Desempenho da aplicação
100%
Temperatura
77 / 95 → 81%
Ruído
59 / 90 → 65%
Audio
74%
Médio
78%
87%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil AORUS X7 DT v8 (i7-8850H, GTX 1080, Full HD)
Florian Glaser, 2018-07-23 (Update: 2018-08- 1)