Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Aorus X7 DT v6

Steve Schardein (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/26/2016

Desempenho sem limites. A Gigabyte levou o design do seu portátil para jogos AORUS para o seguinte nível com a chegada do X7 DT v6. Com desempenho de primeira classe da GPU e CPU, veloz armazenamento SSD, e interconexões poderosas e opções de telas, será que algo pode torná-lo lento?

Aorus X7 DT v6 (X7 Serie)
Processador
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB MB, Análises do: 1566 - 1733 MHz, Memoría: 10000 MHz MHz, 21.21.13.6926 - ForceWare 369.26, no
Memória
32768 MB 
, DDR4-2400
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel 170 PPI, AUO1096, TN LED, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Sunrise Point HM170
Disco rígido
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e, 512 GB 
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Headphones (S/PDIF), Microphone, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Killer e2200 (10/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 30 x 426 x 308
Bateria
94 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0 + 2 subwoofers, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
3.25 kg, Suprimento de energia: 900 g

 

Front: No ports
Front: No ports
Rear: Charging port, USB 3.0
Rear: Charging port, USB 3.0
Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, headphones, microphone
Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, headphones, microphone
Right: SD card reader (full), USB 3.0, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen 1, HDMI, mini DisplayPort
Right: SD card reader (full), USB 3.0, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen 1, HDMI, mini DisplayPort
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT73VR 6RF
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
155.1 MB/s ∼100% +86%
Aorus X7 DT v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83.25 MB/s ∼54%
Aorus X7 v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼50% -6%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼49% -9%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
74 MB/s ∼48% -11%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT73VR 6RF
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
209.4 MB/s ∼100% +131%
Aorus X7 DT v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90.59 MB/s ∼43%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼42% -4%
Aorus X7 v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼42% -4%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
84 MB/s ∼40% -7%
308.7
cd/m²
319.9
cd/m²
294.9
cd/m²
320.6
cd/m²
339.5
cd/m²
296.3
cd/m²
307.6
cd/m²
322.3
cd/m²
270.5
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 339.5 cd/m² Médio: 308.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 339.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 754:1 (Preto: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.88 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 6.57 | - Ø
82% sRGB (Argyll) 54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.04
Aorus X7 DT v6
AUO1096, TN LED, 17.3, 2560x1440
Aorus X7 v6
B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), TN LED, 17.3, 2560x1440
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
HP Omen 17-w110ng
LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
MSI GT73VR 6RF
IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
Response Times
-10%
-75%
-77%
-92%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
21.6
31
-44%
38
-76%
37
-71%
33.6
-56%
Response Time Black / White *
13.2
10
24%
23
-74%
24
-82%
30
-127%
PWM Frequency
59.52
Screen
-5%
16%
24%
13%
Brightness
309
312
1%
290
-6%
342
11%
316
2%
Brightness Distribution
80
80
0%
85
6%
87
9%
87
9%
Black Level *
0.45
0.5
-11%
0.32
29%
0.31
31%
0.422
6%
Contrast
754
686
-9%
984
31%
1168
55%
793
5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.88
7.33
-7%
4.88
29%
4.5
35%
4.11
40%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.57
7.6
-16%
4.17
37%
3.48
47%
5.74
13%
Gamma
2.04 118%
2.19 110%
2.53 95%
2.23 108%
2.3 104%
CCT
8608 76%
9024 72%
6683 97%
6144 106%
5987 109%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
54
55
2%
55
2%
55
2%
60.5
12%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
82
84
2%
83
1%
84
2%
96
17%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-8% / -6%
-30% / -2%
-27% / 4%
-40% / -8%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 8.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (44.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 59.52 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 59.52 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 59.52 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 1486 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 30860) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z RAM SPD
CPU-Z RAM SPD
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
ComputeMark
ComputeMark
SPECViewperf 12
SPECViewperf 12
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 DT v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.92 Points ∼87%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.88 Points ∼85% -2%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
1.72 Points ∼78% -10%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.69 Points ∼77% -12%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.56 Points ∼71% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
9.24 Points ∼46% +1%
Aorus X7 DT v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
9.14 Points ∼46%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
8.55 Points ∼43% -6%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points ∼37% -18%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.3 Points ∼37% -20%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 DT v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
169 Points ∼76%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
164 Points ∼74% -3%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
160 Points ∼72% -5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼66% -12%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
147 Points ∼66% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
874 Points ∼47% +5%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
836 Points ∼45% 0%
Aorus X7 DT v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
832 Points ∼45%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points ∼37% -18%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points ∼36% -19%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Aorus X7 DT v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
296.6 s * ∼4%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
205.867 s * ∼2% +31%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Aorus X7 DT v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
498 Seconds * ∼2%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
484.635 Seconds * ∼2% +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.92 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
9.14 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
79.49 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
169 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
832 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
122.7 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5394 Points ∼83% +1%
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5353 Points ∼82%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
5011 Points ∼77% -6%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4816 Points ∼74% -10%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
4378 Points ∼67% -18%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
8576 Points ∼92% +1%
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
8478 Points ∼91%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
8227 Points ∼88% -3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
7128 Points ∼77% -16%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5096 Points ∼85%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4833 Points ∼81% -5%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4651 Points ∼78% -9%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4579 Points ∼77% -10%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
4252 Points ∼71% -17%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5096 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
8478 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5353 pontos
Ajuda
Aorus X7 DT v6
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
MSI GT73VR 6RF
2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-67%
-38%
-37%
-1%
Write 4k QD32
419.1
256.3
-39%
295.3
-30%
441.8
5%
422.1
1%
Read 4k QD32
676.4
149.4
-78%
600.2
-11%
425
-37%
693.5
3%
Write 4k
161.1
75.74
-53%
153.3
-5%
65.68
-59%
144
-11%
Read 4k
52.86
21.44
-59%
42.7
-19%
31.37
-41%
51.54
-2%
Write 512
1507
287.8
-81%
294.7
-80%
915.8
-39%
1561
4%
Read 512
1064
294.8
-72%
616.2
-42%
698.1
-34%
1180
11%
Write Seq
1588
312.4
-80%
294.9
-81%
916.1
-42%
1576
-1%
Read Seq
1829
485.4
-73%
1156
-37%
914.3
-50%
1673
-9%
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Sequential Read: 1829 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1588 MB/s
512K Read: 1064 MB/s
512K Write: 1507 MB/s
4K Read: 52.86 MB/s
4K Write: 161.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 676.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 419.1 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Aorus X7 DT v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
10854 Points ∼68%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
10419 Points ∼65% -4%
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
10344 Points ∼65% -5%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
8705 Points ∼54% -20%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
8396 Points ∼53% -23%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
7137 Points ∼45% -34%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
28321 Points ∼56% +4%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
27685 Points ∼54% +2%
Aorus X7 DT v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
27135 Points ∼53%
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
23591 Points ∼46% -13%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
22022 Points ∼43% -19%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
20656 Points ∼41% -24%
3DMark
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Aorus X7 DT v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
10551 Points ∼78%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
10382 Points ∼77% -2%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
10246 Points ∼76% -3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
7579 Points ∼56% -28%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X7 DT v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
21928 Points ∼56%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
21781 Points ∼56% -1%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
21270 Points ∼54% -3%
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
17068 Points ∼44% -22%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
16525 Points ∼42% -25%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
15806 Points ∼40% -28%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
125447 Points ∼77% +3%
Aorus X7 DT v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
122172 Points ∼75%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
103913 Points ∼64% -15%
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
101012 Points ∼62% -17%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
86780 Points ∼53% -29%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
64973 Points ∼40% -47%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
365079 Points ∼95% +7%
Aorus X7 DT v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
340743 Points ∼89%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK
214758 Points ∼56% -37%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
187717 Points ∼49% -45%
3DMark 06 Standard
34143 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance
19769 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
169818 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
31695 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16908 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
9557 pontos
Ajuda
Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
140.6 fps ∼95%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
147.8 fps ∼100% +5%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
164.7 fps ∼77%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
103.8 (min: 19.8) fps ∼48% -37%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
168.7 fps ∼78% +2%
Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
130 fps ∼87%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
131.6 fps ∼88% +1%
Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
125 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
125.5 fps ∼100% 0%
Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
141 fps ∼100%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
105 fps ∼74% -26%
Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
124 fps ∼83%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
133.7 fps ∼90% +8%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
118 fps ∼73%
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
97 fps ∼60% -18%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
88.7 fps ∼55% -25%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
89.7 (min: 80) fps ∼56% -24%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
119.4 fps ∼74% +1%
Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
153 fps ∼77%
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
128 fps ∼64% -16%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
125.1 fps ∼63% -18%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
116.6 (min: 81) fps ∼58% -24%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
144.2 fps ∼72% -6%
Mafia 2 - 1920x1080 high AA:0x AF:16x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
214.6 fps ∼97%
baixo média alto ultra
Mafia 2 (2010) 214.6fps
Sleeping Dogs (2012) 140.6fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 164.7fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 130fps
Thief (2014) 125fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 141fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 124fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 118fps
Doom (2016) 153fps

Barulho

Ocioso
32.2 / 35.2 / 35.2 dB
Carga
51.7 / 55.7 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.6 dB(A)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
Noise
1%
9%
4%
-0%
Idle Minimum *
32.2
33
-2%
32
1%
33
-2%
32
1%
Idle Average *
35.2
35
1%
33
6%
34
3%
32
9%
Idle Maximum *
35.2
40
-14%
34
3%
35
1%
35
1%
Load Average *
51.7
43
17%
39
25%
45
13%
50
3%
Load Maximum *
55.7
54
3%
51
8%
52
7%
64
-15%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 34.2 °C45.4 °C37.2 °C 
 31.2 °C36.8 °C33 °C 
 27.6 °C26.6 °C30.8 °C 
Máximo: 45.4 °C
Médio: 33.6 °C
46.8 °C58.2 °C40.8 °C
38.6 °C39.4 °C36 °C
33 °C34.2 °C31.6 °C
Máximo: 58.2 °C
Médio: 39.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  53 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203835.6382534.937.534.9313533.2354032.733.732.75034.632.934.6633332.8338033.831.533.810037.830.337.812539.230.939.21604730.34720050.629.150.625052.32852.331555.628.255.640058.227.758.250058.927.858.963054.827.354.880053.127.653.1100054.126.854.1125058.527.758.516006125.661200055.924.355.9250057.123.857.1315059.423.559.4400057.923.957.9500063.623.563.6630066.123.366.1800063.523.163.51000059.623.159.61250051.723.151.71600046.823.346.8SPL72.337.572.3N30.4330.4median 55.9Aorus X7 DT v6median 26.8median 55.9Delta3.92.23.937.942.234.836.927.730.132.740.628.630.426.427.629.530.826.131.424.627.922.336.523.755.322.662.320.563.219.562.519.262.91967.818.668.91868.418.363.91970.518.171.118.268.818.470.618.374.718.474.518.577.818.67518.678.818.57618.665.730.8851.562.2median 18.6HP Omen 17-w110ngmedian 68.41.66.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Aorus X7 DT v6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.34 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 32%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

HP Omen 17-w110ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 32%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 6.6 / 12.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 31.5 / 33.9 / 34.6 Watt
Carga midlight 205.6 / 250.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus X7 DT v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GT73VR 6RF
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Power Consumption
10%
33%
31%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
31.5
29
8%
20
37%
19
40%
28.9
8%
Idle Average *
33.9
31
9%
24
29%
25
26%
30.6
10%
Idle Maximum *
34.6
38
-10%
29
16%
31
10%
33.1
4%
Load Average *
205.6
111
46%
86
58%
90
56%
224.4
-9%
Load Maximum *
250.8
253
-1%
183
27%
193
23%
302.6
-21%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
3h 02min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
2h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 34min
Aorus X7 DT v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 94 Wh
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 94 Wh
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 62 Wh
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 95 Wh
MSI GT73VR 6RF
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 75.2 Wh
Battery Runtime
26%
11%
77%
25%
Reader / Idle
182
243
34%
432
137%
306
68%
Load
94
58
-38%
115
22%
65
-31%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
144
182
26%
196
36%
247
72%
198
38%

Pro

+ Desempenho recorde da GPU
+ CPU extremamente veloz
+ Excelentes velocidades de armazenamento
+ Overclocking simples da CPU e GPU
+ Controles de velocidade da ventoinha simples e poderosos
+ Design inovador do resfriamento
+ Design atraente (e peso similar)
+ Taxa de atualização da tela de 120 Hz, bons tempos de resposta
+ Ótimo teclado
+ Abundância de iluminação do teclado e opções de macro
+ Opções de atualização e manutenção simples

Contra

- Linhas horizontais discretas visíveis na tela
- Painel TN com ângulos de visão e reprodução de cores ruins
- Operação barulhenta sob uso intenso (com configurações de resfriamento suficientes)
- Alto falantes fracos
- Curta duração da bateria
The AORUS X7 DT v6
The AORUS X7 DT v6

O AORUS X7 DT v6 é um dos portáteis de jogos mais poderosos que analisamos até a data aqui na Notebookcheck, e substancialmente mais leve que a maioria da concorrência, para começar. Graças ao excelente poder da NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 combinada com o multiplicador desbloqueado do Intel Core i7-6820HK—junto com o excelente software de gerenciamento do sistema integrado da Gigabyte—o AORUS X7 DT v6 pode receber o overclock facilmente desde o momento que é ligado. E, como resultado disso e seu efetivo (e inovador) design de resfriamento, ele atinge pontuações incríveis em quase qualquer benchmark: alguns dos mais alto que já vimos até a data em nosso banco de dados.

Ele consegue tudo isso com um peso de apenas 3,25 kg e um chassi de magnésio de apenas 30 mm de espessura. O X7 pode, literalmente, lidar com qualquer jogo que você rode nele, provavelmente com as configurações mais altas, e muito provavelmente com a resolução nativa (1440p) do painel. A tela, à propósito, também é um destaque, em muitas maneiras: embora seja apenas um painel TN com ângulos de visão médios e precisão das cores, ele também oferece tempos de resposta rápidos e uma taxa de atualização de 120 Hz para vídeo e isso é o mais fluente que a GPU pode reproduzir. A única queixa neste departamento - embora possa ser considerável aos olhos de alguns usuários - é a presença de linhas horizontais visíveis no painel graças à tecnologia da tela. No entanto, isso só é realmente visível em telas estáticas e não prejudica o movimento, seja em vídeos ou jogos. Desde que isto não seja muito desconfortável, o X7 também serviria como uma opção atraente para uma estação de trabalho de edição de vídeo.

Os dispositivos de entrada também são muito bons, a qualidade de construção e a estabilidade da carcaça são excelentes, e a maioria do pacote realmente se sente como uma atualização palpável sobre entradas anteriores na linha AORUS.  As deficiências que existem são menores e/ou esperadas: os alto falantes são decepcionantes, embora alguns ajustes no aplicativo de pós-processamento incluído deixa-os aceitáveis. A máquina é bastante barulhenta sob uso intenso — mas o usuário tem controle direto sobre a razão de ruído/desempenho graças ao software Command & Control da Gigabyte. Finalmente, a duração da bateria é bastante pobre graças ao alto consumo de energia e à falta de gráficos alternantes — mas para qualquer um que estiver planejando comprar o X7 pela duração da bateria, poderíamos sugerir que eles avaliem suas prioridades e expectativas.

Em resumo, este é um dos melhores portáteis para jogos que testamos até a data. Se você puder engolir o custo, não se decepcionará com nada.

Aorus X7 DT v6 - 12/05/2016 v6
Steve Schardein

Acabamento
83 / 98 → 85%
Teclado
87%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
66 / 81 → 81%
Peso
55 / 66 → 80%
Bateria
65%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
100%
Desempenho da aplicação
96%
Temperatura
85 / 95 → 89%
Ruído
57 / 90 → 63%
Audio
70%
Camera
65 / 85 → 76%
Impressão
+1%
Médio
71%
86%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Aorus X7 DT v6
Steve Schardein, 2016-11-26 (Update: 2016-12-15)