Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarO mini-me do Area-51m: Breve Análise do Portátil Dell Alienware m15 R2
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 324.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 853:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.64
ΔE Greyscale 7.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | -0% | 4% | -3% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.3 | 66.9 2% | 65.6 0% | 67.6 4% | 63.5 -3% | 63.5 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.1 | 98.1 3% | 92.2 -3% | 97.5 3% | 92.4 -3% | 89.4 -6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.9 | 68.5 4% | 66.9 2% | 68.9 5% | 64.7 -2% | 64.5 -2% |
| Response Times | 1% | 24% | -7% | -33% | -23% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 16.4 ? | 12.8 ? 22% | 7 ? 57% | 13.6 ? 17% | 18.8 ? -15% | 18 ? -10% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8.8 ? | 10.4 ? -18% | 9.6 ? -9% | 12 ? -36% | 13.2 ? -50% | 12 ? -36% |
| PWM Frequency | 23810 ? | 23810 ? 0% | 23260 ? -2% | |||
| Screen | 24% | 13% | 25% | 6% | 5% | |
| Brightness middle | 324.2 | 293 -10% | 323.6 0% | 282.3 -13% | 320.4 -1% | 353.6 9% |
| Brightness | 304 | 270 -11% | 315 4% | 269 -12% | 298 -2% | 346 14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 87 -3% | 91 1% | 90 0% | 85 -6% | 86 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.29 24% | 0.29 24% | 0.32 16% | 0.42 -11% | 0.3 21% |
| Contrast | 853 | 1010 18% | 1116 31% | 882 3% | 763 -11% | 1179 38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.01 | 1.69 66% | 3.31 34% | 1.17 77% | 3.21 36% | 4.55 9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.7 | 3.37 73% | 5.74 55% | 3.29 74% | 5.54 56% | 7.91 38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.64 | 1.24 24% | 2.73 -66% | 1.06 35% | 2.36 -44% | 3.37 -105% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.9 | 2.3 71% | 2.9 63% | 1.3 84% | 3.6 54% | 4.1 48% |
| Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.3 96% | 2.29 96% | 2.2 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 8455 77% | 6758 96% | 6765 96% | 6643 98% | 6503 100% | 7434 87% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60.8 | 63 4% | 59.7 -2% | 63.8 5% | 59 -3% | 57.9 -5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95.5 | 98.5 3% | 91.8 -4% | 97.5 2% | 92 -4% | 88.9 -7% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
16% | 12% /
12% | 7% /
15% | -10% /
-1% | -7% /
-0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 23810 Hz | ≤ 24 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 23810 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 24 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 23810 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| Alienware m17 P37E | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (170 - 194, n=82) | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Alienware m17 P37E | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H (952 - 1306, n=85) | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4207 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5706 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5374 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | Alienware m15 P79F Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -12% | 12% | -26% | 20% | -49% | |
| Seq Read | 1925 | 1937 1% | 1832 -5% | 1239 -36% | 2005 4% | 2289 19% |
| Seq Write | 2371 | 1066 -55% | 1864 -21% | 920 -61% | 1580 -33% | 1163 -51% |
| 4K Read | 37.2 | 31.76 -15% | 52.1 40% | 45.74 23% | 49.33 33% | 22.29 -40% |
| 4K Write | 108.9 | 102.6 -6% | 108.3 -1% | 95.7 -12% | 103.8 -5% | 28.92 -73% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1177 | 1140 -3% | 1159 -2% | 322 -73% | 1241 5% | 415.6 -65% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1135 | 938 -17% | 1807 59% | 722 -36% | 1730 52% | 199.5 -82% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.065 | 0.058 11% | 0.05 23% | 0.073 -12% | 0.054 17% | 0.122 -88% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.108 | 0.04 63% | 0.034 69% | 0.047 56% | 0.036 67% | 0.143 -32% |
| Score Read | 1407 | 1366 -3% | 1394 -1% | 492 -65% | 1490 6% | 667 -53% |
| Score Write | 1481 | 1147 -23% | 2102 42% | 910 -39% | 1991 34% | 345 -77% |
| Score Total | 3633 | 3168 -13% | 4221 16% | 1654 -54% | 4230 16% | 1300 -64% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2073 | 946 -54% | 2083 0% | 1236 -40% | 3025 46% | 1767 -15% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 576 | 452.8 -21% | 496.5 -14% | 703 22% | 713 24% | 379.4 -34% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1426 | 1013 -29% | 977 -31% | 812 -43% | 1554 9% | 1055 -26% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (23386 - 30910, n=20) | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q | |
| Medion Erazer X15805 | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
| MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC | |
| Medion Erazer X15805 | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (9212 - 14894, n=20) | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q | |
| MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 19885 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 33900 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17504 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7785 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (71 - 105, n=8) | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| 1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC | |
| Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (114 - 142, n=5) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC | |
| Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F | |
| Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (65.7 - 92.7, n=22) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Origin PC EVO16-S i7-9750H RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
| Alienware m17 P37E | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q | |
| Medion Erazer X15805 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH | |
| Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
| MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 314.6 | 273.1 | 251.7 | 166.5 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 274.5 | 215.4 | 144.5 | 81.3 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 248.7 | 239.3 | 218.5 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 114 | 91 | 89 | 87 |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | 14% | 1% | 8% | 10% | |
| off / environment * | 28.3 | 28.2 -0% | 28.3 -0% | 28.7 -1% | 28.3 -0% | 28 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.5 | 30.3 -6% | 28.8 -1% | 29.8 -5% | 30.4 -7% | 32.6 -14% |
| Idle Average * | 28.5 | 35.4 -24% | 28.8 -1% | 32.4 -14% | 30.5 -7% | 32.7 -15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 49 | 50.3 -3% | 29 41% | 38 22% | 30.6 38% | 32.7 33% |
| Load Average * | 49 | 50.3 -3% | 33.5 32% | 38.2 22% | 37.6 23% | 33.3 32% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49 | 50.2 -2% | 45 8% | 56.6 -16% | 46 6% | 41.6 15% |
| Load Maximum * | 55 | 50.2 9% | 45.2 18% | 56.6 -3% | 55.1 -0% | 45.2 18% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.5 / 28.5 / 49 dB |
| Carga |
| 49 / 55 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53.8 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.3 °C / -6 F).
Alienware m15 R2 P87F audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.18 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 19 / 40.5 / 52 Watt |
| Carga |
132.3 / 217.2 Watt |
   
| |
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Alienware m15 P79F i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI GP65 Leopard 9SE-225US i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, LiteOn CX2-8B256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 35% | 34% | 24% | 31% | 18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 19 | 10.9 43% | 12.5 34% | 22.9 -21% | 13.6 28% | 22 -16% |
| Idle Average * | 40.5 | 12.3 70% | 15.3 62% | 27.2 33% | 17.9 56% | 26 36% |
| Idle Maximum * | 52 | 19 63% | 20.7 60% | 27.5 47% | 20.6 60% | 33 37% |
| Load Average * | 132.3 | 96 27% | 90.2 32% | 83.4 37% | 96 27% | 86 35% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 183.3 | 161.7 12% | 162 12% | 143.6 22% | 154.6 16% | 159 13% |
| Load Maximum * | 217.2 | 229.1 -5% | 209.3 4% | 160.5 26% | 218.6 -1% | 215 1% |
* ... smaller is better
| Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Alienware m15 P79F i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 50 Wh | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 57 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -7% | 74% | -45% | 9% | -34% | |
| Reader / Idle | 554 | 953 72% | 235 -58% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 332 | 309 -7% | 393 18% | 181 -45% | 362 9% | 166 -50% |
| Load | 44 | 102 132% | 46 5% |
Pro
Contra
Como o modelo de segunda geração da série, esperamos que o Alienware m15 R2 seja objetivamente melhor que o Alienware m15 R1 de primeira geração, em todo sentido. Este não é necessariamente o caso, nem no papel; a RAM e a WLAN agora são soldadas, enquanto a capacidade da bateria é menor desta vez. Por sua vez, os usuários obtêm Ethernet de 2,5 Gbit, resposta aprimorada do teclado, Wi-Fi 6 opcional, iluminação RGB por tecla e uma aparência mais atraente que não parece mais fraca ou mais forte do que o design de saída que substitui.
Mergulhe mais fundo no m15 R2 e suas desvantagens começam a aparecer. A temperatura da CPU, em particular, é muito alta para o conforto, com quase 100 °C durante os jogos, mesmo com os ventiladores configurados no máximo. Teríamos deixado passar as altas temperaturas, caso tivessem significado ventiladores mais silenciosos ou desempenho mais rápido do que a concorrência, mas esse não é o caso. Se alternativas como o Asus Zephyrus S GX531, O HP ElitePad 15 G2, Razer Blade 15, ou MSI GS65 podem funcionar 20 °C mais frios, então não há razão para que o Alienware m15 R2 também não possa. Infelizmente, observamos esses mesmos resultados no Alienware m15 R1 mais antigo, sugerindo que o chassi do m15 R2 não resolve uma de nossas principais críticas sobre a relativamente nova série Alienware m15.
Talvez como resultado das altas temperaturas da CPU, o Core i7-9750H no m15 R2 tenha um desempenho um pouco mais lento que a média do i7-9750H em nosso banco de dados e até o Core i7-8750H no Alienware m15 R1. As velocidades da CPU podem ser muito mais variáveis do que as previstas e as taxas de quadros durante os jogos são consequentemente um pouco mais baixas, bem como quando a CPU está sob uso muito intenso.
Se você está procurando por um portátil Alienware, não há nada de mal em optar pelo mais antigo Alienware m15 R1 dado que o m15 R2 é mais um passo para um lado em termos de desempenho geral, capacidade de atualização e recursos. Recomendamos investir em uma tela com alta taxa de atualização, evitando as configurações Core i9 e de 8 GB de RAM básicas.
As novas atualizações da última geração do modelo Alienware m15 R1 são principalmente superficiais. Enquanto o Alienware m15 R2 parece mais elegante com iluminação RGB por tecla adicionada, atributos internos como ruído do ventilador e temperaturas muito quentes da CPU realmente não mudaram.
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
-
09/05/2019 v7
Allen Ngo
Pricecompare
