snhb.queue.push(function(){ snhb.addAdditionalAdSlotsToRefresh(additionalAdSlots); }); googletag.enableServices(); }); nbc_pagecall();
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Dell G5 15 5590: Portátil de jogos de 15 polegadas com uma GPU Max-Q

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/04/2019

Muito melhor que a versão básica. Recentemente analisamos uma versão muito econômica do Dell G5 15 5590 que possuía um Core i5-9300H e uma Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650. Mas agora vamos dar uma olhada em um modelo mais caro que apresenta o Core i7-9750H e a GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q e custa 2.000 Euros (~ $2229). Leia nossa análise para descobrir se gastar 1.000 Euros extras (~ US$ 1.115) faz algum sentido.

Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW (G5 15 5590 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Análises do: 885 MHz, Memoría: 6000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 431.22, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, todos os slots ocupados, máx. 32 GB
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, 512 GB 
, NVMe-SSD + TOSHIBA MQ04ABF100, HD de 1TB, 5400 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 & 1x 2.5-inch
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC236 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Noble Lock
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 23.7 x 364 x 273
Bateria
90 Wh Lítio-Ion, 6 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: chiclet-style, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força de 180 watts, Command Center, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.755 kg, Suprimento de energia: 602 g
Preço
2000 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionBest Price
83%11/2019Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.8 kg23.7 mm15.6"1920x1080
85%08/2019Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.1 kg18 mm15.6"1920x1080
85%05/2019Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.1 kg19 mm15.6"1920x1080
82%09/2019HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.4 kg19.8 mm15.6"1920x1080
83%05/2019Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
2.1 kg19 mm15.6"1920x1080

Size Comparison

364 mm 273 mm 23.7 mm 2.8 kg362.2 mm 261.6 mm 19.8 mm 2.4 kg360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
197 MB/s ∼100% +757%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 206, n=258)
91.9 MB/s ∼47% +300%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23 MB/s ∼12%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100% +796%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=256)
110 MB/s ∼45% +307%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s ∼11%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
696 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
694 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
692 MBit/s ∼99%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
688 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1380, n=281)
609 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼99% +1%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
670 MBit/s ∼98%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
654 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1160, n=281)
561 MBit/s ∼82% -16%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
554 MBit/s ∼81% -17%
287
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
279
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 315 cd/m² Médio: 294.9 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 291 cd/m²
Contraste: 1323:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.95 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 2.05
ΔE Greyscale 3.82 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
40%
10%
12%
44%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16.4 (8.4, 8)
5.2 (2.6, 2.6)
68%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
7%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
7%
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
56%
Response Time Black / White *
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
12%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
12%
10.8 (6, 4.8)
16%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
31%
PWM Frequency
23580 (24)
Screen
6%
3%
-12%
1%
Brightness middle
291
288
-1%
266
-9%
324.8
12%
286
-2%
Brightness
295
265
-10%
248
-16%
316
7%
275
-7%
Brightness Distribution
83
84
1%
89
7%
84
1%
90
8%
Black Level *
0.22
0.22
-0%
0.31
-41%
0.26
-18%
0.37
-68%
Contrast
1323
1309
-1%
858
-35%
1249
-6%
773
-42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.95
3.22
18%
2.78
30%
4.96
-26%
2.19
45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.46
6.26
16%
5.96
20%
8.95
-20%
4.4
41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.05
1.5
27%
0.91
56%
3.23
-58%
2.27
-11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.82
3.43
10%
3.58
6%
5
-31%
2.2
42%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.21 100%
2.41 91%
CCT
7317 89%
7290 89%
7186 90%
7742 84%
6405 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
60
2%
62
5%
59.8
1%
59
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
93
2%
96
5%
91.8
1%
91
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
23% / 11%
7% / 4%
0% / -9%
23% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9270 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260Tooltip
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1151 (1096.16-1258.33)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1053.71-1188.07)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø968 (959.49-1081.9)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
457 Points ∼100% +10%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
442 Points ∼97% +6%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
430 Points ∼94% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points ∼94% +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 509, n=54)
429 Points ∼94% +3%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
Intel Core i7-9750H
416 Points ∼91%
CPU (Multi Core)
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
Intel Core i7-9750H
2666 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 4926, n=54)
2522 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
2507 Points ∼94% -6%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
2448 Points ∼92% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
2427 Points ∼91% -9%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
2298 Points ∼86% -14%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
189 Points ∼100% +11%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
181 Points ∼96% +6%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼94% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼93% +2%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
Intel Core i7-9750H
171 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=529)
157 Points ∼83% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1258 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
1188 Points ∼94% -6%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points ∼89% -11%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
1057 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=532)
834 Points ∼66% -34%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
171 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1258 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
5991 Points ∼100% +10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5746 Points ∼96% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points ∼95% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points ∼94% +4%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
5462 Points ∼91%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=226)
5228 Points ∼87% -4%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
92%
76%
105%
71%
Write 4K
64.56
108.8
69%
115.5
79%
137.4
113%
97.04
50%
Read 4K
35.64
40.31
13%
57.97
63%
41.37
16%
49.58
39%
Write Seq
748
2488
233%
1555
108%
2500
234%
1838
146%
Read Seq
1039
1916
84%
2590
149%
1576
52%
2421
133%
Write 4K Q32T1
435.7
382.4
-12%
369.3
-15%
446.7
3%
326.9
-25%
Read 4K Q32T1
292.4
421.8
44%
441.7
51%
522.4
79%
372.9
28%
Write Seq Q32T1
869.8
2542
192%
1547
78%
2796
221%
1894
118%
Read Seq Q32T1
1557
3320
113%
2969
91%
3415
119%
2828
82%
SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1557 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 869.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 292.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 435.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1039 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 748 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 35.64 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 64.56 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
18202 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
36724 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15046 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
6557 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
3958 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1097 - 5942, n=62)
3929 Points ∼99% +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3721 Points ∼94% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3719 Points ∼94% +1%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3717 Points ∼94% +1%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3670 Points ∼93%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
7277 Points ∼100% +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6748 Points ∼93% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6716 Points ∼92% +3%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6521 Points ∼90%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6419 Points ∼88% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=167)
5724 Points ∼79% -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
19123 Points ∼100% +15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18060 Points ∼94% +9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17335 Points ∼91% +4%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16606 Points ∼87%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16483 Points ∼86% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=555)
11462 Points ∼60% -31%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
24267 Points ∼100% +13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22749 Points ∼94% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22005 Points ∼91% +3%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21427 Points ∼88%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18434 Points ∼76% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=630)
13571 Points ∼56% -37%
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG; The Witcher 3: Ø62 (57-66)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G; The Witcher 3: Ø65.5 (59-70)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8; The Witcher 3: Ø63 (1-68)
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00; The Witcher 3: Ø63.3 (57-70)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø70 (63-76)
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼100% +14%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
69 fps ∼98% +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
64.4 (min: 54) fps ∼92% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
64.1 fps ∼91% +4%
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H
61.5 (min: 50) fps ∼88%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=327)
50.2 fps ∼72% -18%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 111 61.5 fps
Apex Legends (2019) 106 105 fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 86 78 fps
Anthem (2019) 71.9 67.8 fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 112 68.8 fps
Rage 2 (2019) 74.8 71.5 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 130 97 fps
Control (2019) 57.4 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 65.3 51.1 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 180 179 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 70 52 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 92.6 67 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.53333.433.134.32537.336.539.637.6403131.131.131.731.432.24036.531.931.735.4385033.828.52829.133.16333.62926.827.336.78035.731.531.127.747.610031.831.332.225.135.912531.825.324.427.33316031.427.525.625.933.120030.324.621.922.831.825032.623.521.722.835.531535.923.720.820.73840037.223.719.218.238.550038.323.920.121.240.263037.823.21918.43980037.424.52317.939.8100037.225.225.317.439.2125038.222.920.218.540160038.822.919.718.140.8200038.821.918.917.140.8250039.219.818.816.940.9315040.118.618.117.341.9400039.818.117.917.341.9500033.718.117.817.337.4630028.117.817.71731.2800025.417.617.81728.61000023.617.717.81726.51250020.917.717.617.123.21600018.417.517.616.819.7SPL49.633.632.130.151.5N6.921.71.48.2median 35.9median 22.9median 19.2median 17.9median 38Delta4.93.22.924.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseDell G5 15 5590-P8RVW

Barulho

Ocioso
32 / 33 / 34 dB
HDD
32 dB
Carga
50 / 52 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
1%
-3%
5%
-3%
5%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
29
3%
30
-0%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=328)
2%
Idle Minimum *
32
30
6%
31
3%
30.5
5%
31
3%
31.4 (28 - 42, n=751)
2%
Idle Average *
33
33
-0%
34
-3%
31.5
5%
33
-0%
32.6 (28 - 46.6, n=751)
1%
Idle Maximum *
34
39
-15%
39
-15%
31.5
7%
38
-12%
34.7 (28 - 52, n=751)
-2%
Load Average *
50
45
10%
46
8%
40.6
19%
50
-0%
40.8 (30.1 - 58, n=752)
18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
49
2%
53
-6%
49.5
1%
53
-6%
Load Maximum *
52
51
2%
55
-6%
53.4
-3%
56
-8%
48.1 (38.9 - 64.1, n=752)
7%

* ... smaller is better

 52 °C54 °C52 °C 
 47 °C48 °C47 °C 
 30 °C33 °C33 °C 
Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 44 °C
59 °C61 °C58 °C
52 °C52 °C51 °C
33 °C34 °C29 °C
Máximo: 61 °C
Médio: 47.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  46 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 61 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-3%
-13%
-30%
-10%
-3%
Maximum Upper Side *
54
49
9%
58
-7%
48.8
10%
54
-0%
45.9 (28 - 68.8, n=718)
15%
Maximum Bottom *
61
59
3%
64
-5%
55
10%
47
23%
49.6 (25.9 - 78, n=716)
19%
Idle Upper Side *
25
28
-12%
30
-20%
41
-64%
33
-32%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=670)
-23%
Idle Bottom *
26
29
-12%
31
-19%
45.6
-75%
34
-31%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=668)
-22%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.135.82537.643.73131.435.74035.433.15029.129.76327.333.18027.732.310025.136.312527.343.416025.956.520022.857.725022.86231520.767.340018.273.450021.277.863018.478.180017.977.5100017.475.9125018.573.4160018.177.7200017.179.8250016.979.4315017.383.4400017.373.3500017.370.663001766.880001770.7100001762.51250017.1681600016.868SPL30.189.4N1.480.1median 17.9median 70.7Delta27.143.644.939.640.430.933.83542.828.335.92635.828.642.128.757.423.854.622.957.423.958.52560.92064.219.16417.965.117.372.516.97517.177.818.576.717.874.917.474.117.467.717.676.817.583.317.484.217.279.817.271.617.266.51769.216.863.43090.21.481.4median 17.5median 69.21.86hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell G5 15 5590-P8RVWAsus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.4 / Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 5 / 13 / 23 Watt
Carga midlight 121 / 184 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-1%
-74%
-230%
-98%
-78%
Idle Minimum *
5
7
-40%
21
-320%
46
-820%
24
-380%
19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=712)
-288%
Idle Average *
13
12
8%
23
-77%
59
-354%
27
-108%
24.9 (6.6 - 119, n=712)
-92%
Idle Maximum *
23
22
4%
32
-39%
65.5
-185%
33
-43%
30.1 (8.3 - 122, n=712)
-31%
Load Average *
121
86
29%
97
20%
99.8
18%
129
-7%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=703)
14%
Load Maximum *
184
177
4%
213
-16%
222.7
-21%
216
-17%
172 (21.9 - 590, n=702)
7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
133
144
-8%
148
-11%
154.1
-16%
176
-32%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
8h 33min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 44min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 35min
Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 90 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q,  Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 76 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
23%
40%
-45%
-34%
-25%
Reader / Idle
513
666
30%
545
6%
221
-57%
353
-31%
349 (39 - 1174, n=674)
-32%
WiFi v1.3
344
478
39%
421
22%
129
-62%
220
-36%
259 (78 - 622, n=375)
-25%
Load
95
96
1%
181
91%
80
-16%
62
-35%
79 (18 - 202, n=640)
-17%
H.264
408
257 (88 - 508, n=148)

Pro

+ Comutador gráfico automático
+ Bom painel IPS
+ Porta Thunderbolt 3
+ Tela de 144 Hz

Contra

- Barulhento e quente sob uso intenso
- Afogamento da CPU em aplicativos 3D
- Apenas 24 meses de garantia
- Lento leitor de cartões
Dell G5 15 5590, review device provided courtesy of: cyberport.de
Dell G5 15 5590, review device provided courtesy of: cyberport.de

Com exceção da duração da bateria, o Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW de 2.000-Euros(~$2.229) não é muito melhor do que o G5 15 1000-PCNJJ de 1.000 Euros (~ $1.115).

Além do melhor desempenho (processador, placa gráfica, SSD etc.) e uma porta Thunderbolt 3, o 5590-P8RVW possui uma tela muito mais rápida. Diferentemente da versão básica, a tela de 144 Hz do modelo topo de linha possui um brilho adequado, reprodução de cores utilizável e tempos de resposta mais curtos.  

No entanto, o modelo de 2000-Euros (~$2.229) possui as mesmas falhas da variante de orçamento, como o leitor de cartão lento e a otimização da CPU em aplicativos 3D. Essas falhas impedem que o portátil de 15 polegadas alcance uma classificação mais alta.

Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW - 10/29/2019 v7
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
73 / 98 → 75%
Teclado
79%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
69 / 80 → 87%
Peso
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Bateria
67 / 95 → 71%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
91%
Desempenho da aplicação
88%
Temperatura
80 / 95 → 85%
Ruído
69 / 90 → 76%
Audio
73%
Médio
76%
83%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Dell G5 15 5590: Portátil de jogos de 15 polegadas com uma GPU Max-Q
Florian Glaser, 2019-11- 4 (Update: 2019-11- 6)