Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW (Core i7-9750H, RTX 2070)

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/20/2019

Poderoso, porém, fino. Os portáteis de jogos ultra finos estão atualmente em tendência com dispositivos da Gigabyte, MSI e Razer liderando o caminho. A ASUS agora atualizou sua série GX502 accordingly, mas será que seu chassi fino pode suportar um Core i7-9750H e uma GeForce RTX 2070? Continue lendo para descobrir.

Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW (Zephyrus S GX502 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1215 MHz, Memoría: 7000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 419.71, Optimus
Memória
32768 MB 
, 16 GB soldered & 16 GB DDR4-2666 SO-DIMM. All SO-DIMM slots occupied
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), 1024 GB 
, 2 x M.2 2280 drive bays
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC294 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Conexões
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Dedicated headphone and microphone ports
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19 x 360 x 252
Bateria
76 Wh Lítio-Ion, 4 cells
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: External, no built-in camera
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 230 W power supply, 3D sculpture for crafting, various manufacturer tools, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.064 kg, Suprimento de energia: 632 g
Preço
2600 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg360 mm 268 mm 15.75 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg
Left-hand side: ventilation grille, power connector, RJ45 LAN, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-A, microphone jack, headphone jack
Left-hand side: ventilation grille, power connector, RJ45 LAN, HDMI 2.0, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-A, microphone jack, headphone jack
Right-hand side: USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, 2 x USB 3.0 Type-A, ventilation grille, Kensington lock slot
Right-hand side: USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-C, 2 x USB 3.0 Type-A, ventilation grille, Kensington lock slot
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼99%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼99% 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s ∼98% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
661 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=264)
605 MBit/s ∼88% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
644 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 749, n=264)
560 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
270
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
258
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
273
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 286 cd/m² Médio: 275.3 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 286 cd/m²
Contraste: 773:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.19 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 2.27
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Triton 500
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
-3%
-19%
-83%
-92%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
7 (3.6, 3.4)
3%
8 (4, 4)
-11%
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
-133%
16.4 (8.8, 7.6)
-128%
Response Time Black / White *
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
-9%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
-27%
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
-32%
13.6 (8.4, 5.2)
-55%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-3%
-24%
-2%
12%
Brightness middle
286
323.6
13%
304
6%
314.7
10%
250
-13%
Brightness
275
315
15%
299
9%
312
13%
235
-15%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
89
-1%
90
0%
85
-6%
Black Level *
0.37
0.29
22%
0.27
27%
0.38
-3%
0.29
22%
Contrast
773
1116
44%
1126
46%
828
7%
862
12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.19
3.31
-51%
4.66
-113%
2.56
-17%
1.46
33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.4
5.74
-30%
9.65
-119%
4.89
-11%
2.47
44%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.27
2.73
-20%
1.72
24%
1.71
25%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.2
2.9
-32%
5.53
-151%
3.4
-55%
1.27
42%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.29 96%
2.5 88%
2.3 96%
2.4 92%
CCT
6405 101%
6765 96%
8028 81%
6435 101%
6749 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
59.7
1%
60
2%
60.7
3%
60
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
91.8
1%
93
2%
94.6
4%
93
2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-3% / -3%
-22% / -24%
-43% / -15%
-40% / -5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.8 ms rise
↘ 3.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9418 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1072 (986.63-1110.9)
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points ∼95% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=510)
156 Points ∼88% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1122 Points ∼95% -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1019 Points ∼86% -14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=513)
824 Points ∼70% -30%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
177 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1182 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
5883 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points ∼96%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5492 Points ∼93% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼92% -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points ∼91% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=206)
5231 Points ∼89% -7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Acer Predator Triton 500
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-29%
7%
-10%
-11%
Write 4K
97.04
93.92
-3%
93.6
-4%
93.88
-3%
97.13
0%
Read 4K
49.58
46.29
-7%
38.82
-22%
40.56
-18%
53.66
8%
Write Seq
1838
974.3
-47%
2455
34%
1468
-20%
1526
-17%
Read Seq
2421
1425
-41%
2107
-13%
1540
-36%
2020
-17%
Write 4K Q32T1
326.9
259.4
-21%
298.7
-9%
293.5
-10%
285.6
-13%
Read 4K Q32T1
372.9
296.5
-20%
338.7
-9%
346
-7%
321.8
-14%
Write Seq Q32T1
1894
976.7
-48%
2902
53%
1941
2%
1533
-19%
Read Seq Q32T1
2828
1666
-41%
3536
25%
3266
15%
2351
-17%
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2828 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1894 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 372.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 326.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2421 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1838 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 49.58 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 97.04 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
18686 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
30754 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16290 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
6890 pontos
Ajuda
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø70 (63-76)
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø76.1 (70-81)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8; The Witcher 3: Ø51.3 (44-61)
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8171 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
7277 Points ∼89%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6728 Points ∼82% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6562 Points ∼80% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=149)
5749 Points ∼70% -21%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
21237 Points ∼100% +11%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
19123 Points ∼90%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18153 Points ∼85% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17598 Points ∼83% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=536)
11369 Points ∼54% -41%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28997 Points ∼100% +19%
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28083 Points ∼97% +16%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
24267 Points ∼84%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22723 Points ∼78% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22089 Points ∼76% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=611)
13399 Points ∼46% -45%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
80.3 fps ∼100% +14%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
76.5 (min: 63) fps ∼95% +9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼87%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
68.9 fps ∼86% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
58.3 (min: 48) fps ∼73% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=307)
49.7 fps ∼62% -29%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 13070.2fps
Apex Legends (2019) 128126fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 9183fps
Metro Exodus (2019) 65.152.9fps
Anthem (2019) 8479fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 12175fps
The Division 2 (2019) 9879fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 76.839.5fps

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 33 / 38 dB
Carga
50 / 56 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
4%
9%
17%
7%
off / environment *
30
28.7
4%
29
3%
28.8
4%
30
-0%
Idle Minimum *
31
29.8
4%
30
3%
28.8
7%
32
-3%
Idle Average *
33
32.4
2%
32
3%
28.8
13%
34
-3%
Idle Maximum *
38
38
-0%
34
11%
29.4
23%
36
5%
Load Average *
50
38.2
24%
44
12%
35.7
29%
42
16%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53
56.6
-7%
46
13%
42.5
20%
44
17%
Load Maximum *
56
56.6
-1%
47
16%
45
20%
48
14%

* ... smaller is better

 52 °C54 °C50 °C 
 48 °C50 °C43 °C 
 38 °C36 °C33 °C 
Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 44.9 °C
41 °C41 °C44 °C
42 °C44 °C47 °C
33 °C35 °C33 °C
Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 40 °C
alimentação elétrica  44 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 42.2 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-9.2 °C / -16.6 F).
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
6%
-3%
12%
-1%
Maximum Upper Side *
54
47
13%
49
9%
49
9%
56
-4%
Maximum Bottom *
47
48.6
-3%
58
-23%
49
-4%
66
-40%
Idle Upper Side *
33
28.8
13%
33
-0%
25.4
23%
27
18%
Idle Bottom *
34
33.2
2%
33
3%
27.2
20%
27
21%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.644.92539.640.43130.933.8403542.85028.335.9632635.88028.642.110028.757.412523.854.616022.957.420023.958.52502560.93152064.240019.16450017.965.163017.372.580016.975100017.177.8125018.576.7160017.874.9200017.474.1250017.467.7315017.676.8400017.583.3500017.484.2630017.279.8800017.271.61000017.266.5125001769.21600016.863.4SPL3090.2N1.481.4median 17.5median 69.2Delta1.8640.540.538.139.536.237.338.135.836.835.938.436.534.635.734.234.832.138.532.750.531.959.530.865.730.466.830.363.729.364.829.462.928.86629.165.228.468.528.469.428.368.228.47028.170.827.97327.969.12862.727.855.230.360.427.76727.565.540.780.5449.2median 28.8median 65.51.24hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zephyrus S GX502GWAsus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.03 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 1.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 24 / 27 / 33 Watt
Carga midlight 129 / 216 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
18%
20%
36%
31%
Idle Minimum *
24
16.1
33%
16
33%
10.4
57%
16
33%
Idle Average *
27
20.9
23%
22
19%
14.6
46%
18
33%
Idle Maximum *
33
27
18%
32
3%
16.3
51%
23
30%
Load Average *
129
93.4
28%
89
31%
88.5
31%
88
32%
Load Maximum *
216
215.3
-0%
173
20%
182.4
16%
167
23%
Witcher 3 ultra *
176
168.2
4%
147
16%
155.4
12%
120
32%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
5h 53min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 40min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 02min
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 76 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 50 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 82 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, 80 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, 94.24 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-18%
4%
70%
104%
16%
Reader / Idle
353
335
-5%
682
93%
549
56%
WiFi v1.3
220
181
-18%
190
-14%
387
76%
382
74%
255 (78 - 622, n=355)
16%
Load
62
81
31%
88
42%
174
181%
H.264
364

Pro

+ Nvidia Optimus or G-Sync
+ compact & stylish design
+ colour-accurate display
+ 144 Hz refresh rate
+ useful software
+ decent performance
+ light for a 15.6-inch gaming laptop
+ RGB backlit keyboard

Contra

- noisy under load
- no Thunderbolt 3
- no card reader
- partially soldered RAM
- underwhelming battery life
- high power consumption
- mediocre speakers

Error: More than one (2) Pro / Contra Item for this review found!

The ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW laptop review. Test device courtesy of ASUS Germany.
The ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW laptop review. Test device courtesy of ASUS Germany.

Na superfície, o ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW é atualmente um dos melhores portáteis de jogos que você pode comprar. Ele tem algumas fraquezas frustrantes que podem afastar as pessoas.

O dispositivo tem um design compacto e fino, mas ainda assim consegue alojar componentes incrivelmente poderosos. Suas CPU e GPU topo de gama permitem-lhe rodar facilmente todos os jogos triple-A lançados ao longo dos últimos anos, com configurações gráficas altas a máximas. Seus tempos de resposta baixos, suporte a G-Sync e taxa de atualização de 144 Hz devem fazer com que os jogos pareçam mais fluentes também. No entanto, você terá que suportar visuais de baixo contraste e uma duração de bateria terrível. Ainda assim recomendamos a ativação do Nvidia Optimus quando você não estiver jogando, já que a GPU consumirá a muita energia da bateria se estiver sempre ativada.

O ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW tem muito a oferecer. É elegante, compacto e proporciona uma excelente experiência de jogo. No entanto, é barulhento, não possui algumas portas úteis e tem uma duração de bateria horrível.

Não podemos entender algumas das decisões que a ASUS tomou. Soldar metade da RAM na placa-mãe parece tolice, assim como a decisão de não incluir um leitor de cartões, uma câmera ou uma porta Thunderbolt 3. Em última análise, o GX502GW funciona de forma muito barulhenta e quente para um portátil de jogos premium fino e leve.

Em suma, existem algumas razões para considerar a série GX502 sobre o Aero 15-X9 ou o Razer Blade 15. Uma delas pode ser sua GPU não Max-Q, mas ter um portátil completo da série RTX 20 vem com desvantagens. O GX502GW ainda é uma boa opção se estiver procurando um portátil para jogos de 15,6 polegadas, mas ele simplesmente perde o padrão que a Gigabyte e a Razer definiram.

Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW - 05/15/2019 v6(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
83 / 98 → 85%
Teclado
79%
Mouse
75%
Conectividade
60 / 81 → 74%
Peso
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Bateria
73%
Pantalha
90%
Desempenho do jogos
98%
Desempenho da aplicação
100%
Temperatura
80 / 95 → 84%
Ruído
61 / 90 → 68%
Audio
76%
Médio
78%
86%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil ASUS ROG Zephyrus S GX502GW (Core i7-9750H, RTX 2070)
Florian Glaser, 2019-05-20 (Update: 2019-05-21)