Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 14 (7700HQ, GTX 1060)

Name: Gigabyte Aero 14
Brand: Gigabyte

Corredor de maratona arejado. O Aero 14 é a primeira tentativa da Gigabyte de um portátil para jogos. A receita para isso parece ser realmente simples. Comece com hardware de gama alta, uma carcaça de alumínio bem feita, adicione uma tela WQHD e tempere a gosto com uma bateria com capacidade surpreendente. Por enquanto, podemos dizer isto: ele se desempenha muito bem, mas inclusive este aparelho poli funcional não chega sem compromissos.

Sven Kloevekorn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/11/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of Gigabyte DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Gigabyte Aero 14 (Aero 14 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 378.66, Nvidia Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, DDR4, 2400 MHz, Single-Channel, 1 de 2 slot de RAM livre, máx. 32 GB

Pantalha

14.00 polegadas 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 210 PPI, LG Philips LP140QH1-SPF1 (LGD049A), IPS, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM175

Disco rígido

LiteOn CX2-8B256, 256 GB

, SSD m.2 2280

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC255 @ High Definition Audio-Controller

Conexões

4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Entrada /saída de áudio combinada de 3,5mm, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20 x 335 x 250

Bateria

94 Wh, 6200 mAh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, 2 x 2 Watts, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador de 150 Watts, Adaptador USB-Ethernet, DVD de recuperação, Adobe Reader XI, CyberLink PowerDVD 12, MS Office Trial, XSplit Gamecaster Trial, various other tools., 24 Meses Garantia

peso

1.878 kg, Suprimento de energia: 466 g

Preço

2000 EUR

Links

Gigabyte página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

SCHENKER XMG P407 MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Razer Blade (2016) Gigabyte Aero 14 DIN A4 ❌

Left side: Kensington lock, HDMI, USB 3.0, audio in/out, SD card

Right side: USB 3.1 Type-C, Mini DisplayPort, 2 x USB 3.0, power

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG P407	76 MB/s +4%
Gigabyte Aero 14	73 MB/s
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US	22.6 MB/s -69%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
SCHENKER XMG P407	87 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte Aero 14	87 MB/s
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US	25.55 MB/s -71%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade (2016) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	591 MBit/s +17%
Gigabyte Aero 14 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	503 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG P407 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	439 MBit/s -13%
iperf3 receive AX12
Gigabyte Aero 14 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	684 MBit/s
Razer Blade (2016) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	646 MBit/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG P407 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	480 MBit/s -30%


244 cd/m²	259 cd/m²	263 cd/m²
230 cd/m²	290 cd/m²	258 cd/m²
245 cd/m²	264 cd/m²	260 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LG Philips LP140QH1-SPF1 (LGD049A) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 290 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 257 cd/m² Minimum: 9 cd/m²
iluminação: 79 %
iluminação com acumulador: 290 cd/m²
Contraste: 967:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.59 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.32 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Gigabyte Aero 14 LG Philips LP140QH1-SPF1 (LGD049A), , 2560x1440, 14.00	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Name: LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1, ID: LGD046D, , 1920x1080, 14.00	SCHENKER XMG P407 LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), , 1920x1080, 14.00	Razer Blade (2016) Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), , 3200x1800, 14.00
Display		-3%	-6%	4%
Display P3 Coverage	64.4	65.5 2%	64.5 0%	66.9 4%
sRGB Coverage	91.8	86.4 -6%	82.1 -11%	96.8 5%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	65.5	63.1 -4%	60 -8%	68.2 4%
Response Times		13%	-12%	-24%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	41 ?(17, 24)	31.6 ?(10.4, 21.2) 23%	47 ?(14, 33) -15%	41 ?(15, 26) -0%
Response Time Black / White *	25 ?(4, 21)	24.4 ?(5.2, 19.2) 2%	27 ?(5, 22) -8%	37 ?(9, 28) -48%
PWM Frequency				200 ?(90)
Screen		10%	3%	30%
Brightness middle	290	288.4 -1%	298 3%	328 13%
Brightness	257	282 10%	282 10%	328 28%
Brightness Distribution	79	83 5%	80 1%	69 -13%
Black Level *	0.3	0.35 -17%	0.27 10%	0.22 27%
Contrast	967	824 -15%	1104 14%	1491 54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.59	2.61 43%	4.42 4%	1.91 58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.68	7.34 15%	8.57 1%	3.23 63%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.32	1.18 73%	4.11 5%	1.69 61%
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2.24 ^98%	2.5 ^88%	2.3 ^96%
CCT	7320 ^89%	6506 ^100%	6329 ^103%	6418 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	59	56.4 -4%	54 -8%	63 7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	92	86.4 -6%	82 -11%	97 5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		7% / 8%	-5% / -1%	3% / 18%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4 ms rise
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17 ms rise
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 24 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 14 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	159 Points
SCHENKER XMG P407 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	149 Points -6%
Razer Blade (2016) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	146 Points -8%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	130 Points -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG P407 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	738 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 14 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	730 Points
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	675 Points -8%
Razer Blade (2016) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	671 Points -8%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

159 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

730 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
SCHENKER XMG P407 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e	4069 Points +9%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4016 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero 14 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256	3717 Points
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	3417 Points -8%
Work Score Accelerated v2
SCHENKER XMG P407 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e	5234 Points +11%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4796 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 14 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256	4702 Points
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	4214 Points -10%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3717 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4702 pontos
Ajuda

	Gigabyte Aero 14 LiteOn CX2-8B256	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	SCHENKER XMG P407 Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e	Razer Blade (2016) Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-68%	19%	-12%
Read Seq	1584	335.3 -79%	1345 -15%	1296 -18%
Write Seq	795	299 -62%	1502 89%	603 -24%
Read 512	985	223 -77%	320.3 -67%	655 -34%
Write 512	814	246.7 -70%	1276 57%	604 -26%
Read 4k	44.93	17.68 -61%	58.9 31%	42.22 -6%
Write 4k	131.2	35.31 -73%	171 30%	139.6 6%
Read 4k QD32	602	247.4 -59%	625 4%	573 -5%
Write 4k QD32	441	156.3 -65%	539 22%	480 9%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

LiteOn CX2-8B256

Sequential Read: 1584 MB/s

Sequential Write: 795 MB/s

512K Read: 985 MB/s

512K Write: 814 MB/s

4K Read: 44.93 MB/s

4K Write: 131.2 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 602 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 441 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11776 Points +1%
Gigabyte Aero 14 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11625 Points
Razer Blade (2016) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	10890 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG P407 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	8376 Points -28%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14977 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 14 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14731 Points
Razer Blade (2016) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	13891 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG P407 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	10402 Points -29%

3DMark 11 Performance		11868 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		20574 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		9778 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

The Witcher 3 ultra

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Gigabyte Aero 14 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	38.3 fps
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	37.3 fps -3%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)				38.3
Anno 2205 (2015)			77.5	29
The Division (2016)			46.9	37.8
For Honor (2017)			56 ()	42 ()
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)		66.2	60.1	35.7

Barulho

Ocioso		31 / 32 / 33 dB
Carga		42 / 53 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


58.3 °C	51.7 °C	57.8 °C
42.6 °C	45.4 °C	38.6 °C
31.8 °C	34.4 °C	34.5 °C

Máximo: 58.3 °C
Médio: 43.9 °C


54.2 °C	59.8 °C	49.3 °C
47.8 °C	52.7 °C	42 °C
36.8 °C	37.6 °C	35.4 °C

Máximo: 59.8 °C
Médio: 46.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 48 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


22.7 °C	23.2 °C	22.8 °C
22.9 °C	23.3 °C	23.1 °C
22.7 °C	22.8 °C	22.8 °C

Máximo: 23.3 °C
Médio: 22.9 °C


23.1 °C	23.3 °C	23.2 °C
23.3 °C	23.8 °C	23.3 °C
23.3 °C	23.2 °C	23.3 °C

Máximo: 23.8 °C
Médio: 23.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 32.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


52.1 °C	45.4 °C	52.9 °C
40.1 °C	43.3 °C	36.6 °C
30.5 °C	32.5 °C	32.8 °C

Máximo: 52.9 °C
Médio: 40.7 °C


49.7 °C	53.7 °C	45.8 °C
45.7 °C	48.5 °C	39.9 °C
35.3 °C	35.1 °C	32.2 °C

Máximo: 53.7 °C
Médio: 42.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 41.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 58.3 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59.8 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.5 °C / 94.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.7 °C / -10.3 F).

Gigabyte Aero 14 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade (2016) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG P407 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.6 / 1.1 Watt
Ocioso	8 / 13 / 20 Watt
Carga	78 / 146 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Gigabyte Aero 14 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	SCHENKER XMG P407 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
Power Consumption		-28%	-10%	-2%
Idle Minimum *	8	12.1 -51%	10 -25%	9 -13%
Idle Average *	13	19 -46%	15 -15%	14 -8%
Idle Maximum *	20	19.5 2%	24 -20%	22 -10%
Load Average *	78	106.7 -37%	82 -5%	72 8%
Witcher 3 ultra *	110
Load Maximum *	146	159 -9%	124 15%	124 15%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		15h 9min
WiFi Websurfing		8h 44min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 9min

	Gigabyte Aero 14 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 94 Wh	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 61 Wh	SCHENKER XMG P407 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh	Razer Blade (2016) 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 70 Wh
Battery Runtime		-42%	-45%	-54%
Reader / Idle	909	577 -37%	443 -51%
WiFi v1.3	524	261 -50%	241 -54%	243 -54%
Load	129	78 -40%	92 -29%
H.264			213

Então, está tudo ótimo? Bom, quase. A maioria dos itens em nossa lista de contras provavelmente será irrelevante para o típico consumidor do Aero 14. No entanto, o barulho constante da ventoinha com revoluções médias é muito irritante, e a Gigabyte precisa urgentemente abordar esse problema.

Fora isso, o Aero 14 deixou uma impressão geral muito boa. Apesar de sua massiva bateria, a carcaça de alumínio é compacta e leve; além de seu teclado co layout fora do padrão, os dispositivos de entrada ainda são suficientemente bons inclusive para portáteis de escritório; e existem mais portas das poderíamos desejar, incluindo um adaptador USB-Ethernet já incluída na caixa. Também não temos reclamos sobre o seu desempenho.

Sua enorme bateria e sua duração resultante, certamente são um recurso exclusivo do Gigabyte Aero 14 entre seus irmãos portáteis para jogos. Isto, no entanto, é ofuscado pelo barulho de alta frequência da ventoinha, motivo pelo qual simplesmente não podemos recomendar este portátil.

Pro

+ Leve e compacto

+ Carcaça metálica sólida e bem feita

+ Portas muito sensíveis

+ Bom desempenho Wi-Fi

+ Adaptador USB-Ethernet incluído

+ Teclas Macro programáveis

+ Sensação muito boa do teclado

+ Touchpad resistente

+ Sem PWM

+ Nvidia Optimus

+ SSD NVMe veloz

+ Silencioso durante o modo inativo e sob carga intermitente

+ Muito boa duração da bateria

Contra

- Sem Thunderbolt 3

- Bateria não removível

- Leva um tempo se acostumar ao layout do teclado

- Rótulos das teclas difíceis de ler

- Tela muito escura para este preço

- Sem G-Sync

- Os giros médios da ventoinha produzem um barulho irritante

In review: Gigabyte Aero 14. Review unit provided by Gigabyte Germany.

So, is everything hunky-dory? Well, almost. Most of the items on our cons list will probably be irrelevant to the typical Aero 14 consumer. However, the constant fan whining at medium revs is very annoying, and Gigabyte urgently needs to address this issue.

Other than that, the Aero 14 left a very good overall impression. Despite its massive battery the aluminum case is compact and lightweight; apart from its non-standard keyboard layout the input devices, while clearly designed with gamers in mind (re: macro keys), are still decent enough even for office laptops; and there are more ports than we could wish for, including a USB-Ethernet adaptor already included in the box. Also, we have no complaints regarding its performance.

Its enormous battery and the resulting battery life are surely a unique feature of Gigabyte’s Aero 14 among its mobile-gaming laptop brethren. This, however, is overshadowed by the fan’s overly annoying high-frequency whining noise, which is why we simply cannot recommend this laptop.

Gigabyte Aero 14 - 2017-06-30 06/30/2017 v6^(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabamento

86 / 98 → 87%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

83%

Conectividade

61 / 81 → 75%

Peso

65 / 20-67 → 95%

Bateria

91%

Pantalha

87%

Desempenho do jogos

92 / 85 → 100%

Desempenho da aplicação

92 / 92 → 100%

Temperatura

79%

Ruído

68 / 95 → 72%

Audio

70%

Camera

63 / 85 → 74%

Médio

78%

86%

Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Finn D Boerne - Translator - 450 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 14 (7700HQ, GTX 1060)

Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-04-11 (Update: 2017-04-16)

Breve Análise do Portátil Gigabyte Aero 14 (7700HQ, GTX 1060)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Gigabyte Aero 14 audio analysis

Razer Blade (2016) audio analysis

MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US audio analysis

SCHENKER XMG P407 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare