Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 17 (7700HQ, GTX 1070, Full-HD)

Christian Hintze (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 08/15/2017

O novo traje do Omen A HP redesenhou a carcaça da sua série de jogos Omen 17. O novo chassi aborda nossas críticas do dispositivo do ano passado? Quais são as melhorias para os gamers a tempo completo?

HP Omen 17-an014ng (Omen Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Análises do: 1443 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 381.89, No Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM, ambos slots ocupados
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 127 PPI, AUO149D, IPS, Full-HD, G-Sync, 120 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM175
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, M.2-SSD + HGST HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD, 7200 RPM
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: microphone + headphones, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Sensores: acelerômetro
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Unidade ótica
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 33 x 423 x 304
Bateria
86 Wh Lítio-Ion, 8-células, suporta carga rápida, cerca de 90 % em 90 minutos
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HP wide vision HD câmera com microfone digital dual-array integrado
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0 Bang & Olufsen (HP Audio Boost), Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, carregador de 230 W, HP Apps: HP Audio Switch, HP CoolSense, HP JumpStart, HP Lounge , 24 Meses Garantia, 2-anos de garantia em peças, pick-up and bring-in, extensões de até 3 anos, disponíveis
peso
3.786 kg, Suprimento de energia: 815 g
Preço
2000 Euro

 

Größenvergleich

left: Kensington lock, Mini DisplayPort, HDMI, LAN, USB Type-A, USB Type-C, headphones, microphone, SD card reader
left: Kensington lock, Mini DisplayPort, HDMI, LAN, USB Type-A, USB Type-C, headphones, microphone, SD card reader
right: DVD burner, 2x USB Type-A, power
right: DVD burner, 2x USB Type-A, power
rear: fan vents
rear: fan vents
front: 2 downward-facing speakers
front: 2 downward-facing speakers
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
125 MB/s ∼100% +64%
Gigabyte P57X v7
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.2 MB/s ∼63% +3%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼62% +3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼61% 0%
Nexoc G734IV
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼61% 0%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼61%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
205 MB/s ∼100% +136%
Gigabyte P57X v7
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90.4 MB/s ∼44% +4%
Nexoc G734IV
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼43% +1%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼43% +1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼42% 0%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼42%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
702 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
681 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Nexoc G734IV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
678 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
676 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
672 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
618 MBit/s ∼100% +40%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
529 MBit/s ∼86% +19%
Nexoc G734IV
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
522 MBit/s ∼84% +18%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
512 MBit/s ∼83% +16%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
443 MBit/s ∼72%
326
cd/m²
329
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 330 cd/m² Médio: 309.3 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 314 cd/m²
Contraste: 924:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.19 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.49 | - Ø
93% sRGB (Argyll) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.34
HP Omen 17-an014ng
AUO149D, 1920x1080, 17.3
HP Omen 17-w110ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080, 17.3
Nexoc G734IV
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPD1 (LGD046C), 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3
Gigabyte P57X v7
SHP145E, 3840x2160, 17.3
Asus G752VS-BA338T
AU Optronics B173HAN01.1 (AUO119D), 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
20%
8%
57%
-39%
17%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45.2 (20.8, 24.4)
37 (13, 24)
18%
42 (15, 27)
7%
29 (13, 16)
36%
55.6 (18.4, 37.2)
-23%
36 (18, 18)
20%
Response Time Black / White *
30.4 (16.4, 14)
24 (4, 20)
21%
28 (6, 22)
8%
7 (4, 3)
77%
46.8 (10.4, 36.4)
-54%
26 (14.4, 11.6)
14%
PWM Frequency
1000 (29)
Screen
-2%
-2%
-40%
-3%
-22%
Brightness
309
342
11%
336
9%
277
-10%
408
32%
300
-3%
Brightness Distribution
88
87
-1%
91
3%
87
-1%
86
-2%
88
0%
Black Level *
0.34
0.31
9%
0.32
6%
0.27
21%
0.44
-29%
0.32
6%
Contrast
924
1168
26%
1088
18%
1107
20%
1003
9%
959
4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.19
4.5
-41%
4.13
-29%
9.65
-203%
5.1
-60%
5.53
-73%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.49
3.48
-0%
3.52
-1%
9.68
-177%
4.3
-23%
7
-101%
Gamma
2.34 103%
2.23 108%
2.32 103%
1.89 127%
2.08 115%
2.48 97%
CCT
7261 90%
6144 106%
6228 104%
11652 56%
7345 88%
8103 80%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
55
-8%
55
-8%
75
25%
87
45%
58
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
84
-10%
84
-10%
100
8%
100
8%
90
-3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
9% / 3%
3% / 0%
9% / -20%
-21% / -10%
-3% / -14%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.8 ms rise
↘ 24.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼100% +12%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼99% +10%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points ∼94% +6%
Nexoc G734IV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
150 Points ∼93% +4%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼92% +3%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
144 Points ∼89%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼100% +1%
Nexoc G734IV
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
739 Points ∼100% +1%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points ∼99% 0%
Gigabyte P57X v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
735 Points ∼99%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points ∼92% -8%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5410 Points ∼100% +2%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5
5404 Points ∼100% +2%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5394 Points ∼100% +2%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5289 Points ∼98%
Nexoc G734IV
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5288 Points ∼98% 0%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
4218 Points ∼78% -20%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5103 Points ∼100% +2%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5
5009 Points ∼98% 0%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4989 Points ∼98%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4833 Points ∼95% -3%
Nexoc G734IV
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4330 Points ∼85% -13%
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
3569 Points ∼70% -28%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4989 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5289 pontos
Ajuda
HP Omen 17-an014ng
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
Nexoc G734IV
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5
Gigabyte P57X v7
Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800)
Asus G752VS-BA338T
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-35%
5%
-52%
-59%
16%
Write 4k QD32
523.4
295.3
-44%
508.9
-3%
318.3
-39%
296
-43%
527.2
1%
Read 4k QD32
582.1
600.2
3%
634
9%
331.1
-43%
281.3
-52%
606.9
4%
Write 4k
144.9
153.3
6%
154.9
7%
111.1
-23%
82.25
-43%
163.8
13%
Read 4k
59.06
42.7
-28%
54.04
-8%
33.35
-44%
26.04
-56%
55.08
-7%
Write 512
853.5
294.7
-65%
1167
37%
332.3
-61%
306.1
-64%
1606
88%
Read 512
1044
616.2
-41%
413.8
-60%
403.1
-61%
315
-70%
400.8
-62%
Write Seq
1212
294.9
-76%
1559
29%
311.8
-74%
305.7
-75%
1596
32%
Read Seq
1736
1156
-33%
2268
31%
521.2
-70%
516.8
-70%
2791
61%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Sequential Read: 1736 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1212 MB/s
512K Read: 1044 MB/s
512K Write: 853.5 MB/s
4K Read: 59.06 MB/s
4K Write: 144.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 582.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 523.4 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
24349 Points ∼100% +11%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
23243 Points ∼95% +6%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
23170 Points ∼95% +6%
Nexoc G734IV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
22210 Points ∼91% +1%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
21918 Points ∼90%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
20656 Points ∼85% -6%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
18346 Points ∼100% +6%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17625 Points ∼96% +2%
Nexoc G734IV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17298 Points ∼94% 0%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17289 Points ∼94%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17170 Points ∼94% -1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
15806 Points ∼86% -9%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 17-an014ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
108657 Points ∼100%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
108027 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
101587 Points ∼93% -7%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
86780 Points ∼80% -20%
Nexoc G734IV
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
76321 Points ∼70% -30%
Gigabyte P57X v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
75190 Points ∼69% -31%
3DMark 11 Performance
16190 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
28209 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13658 pontos
Ajuda
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
59.6 fps ∼100% +3%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
58 fps ∼97%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
50.8 (min: 41) fps ∼85% -12%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
117 fps ∼100% +8%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
108.78 fps ∼93%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
94.8 (min: 69) fps ∼81% -13%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
184.4 fps ∼100% +9%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
168.68 fps ∼91%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
150 (min: 113) fps ∼81% -11%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
228.1 fps ∼100% +9%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
209.61 fps ∼92%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
196.3 (min: 132) fps ∼86% -6%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
99 fps ∼100% +9%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
90.93 fps ∼92%
Nexoc G734IV
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
90.3 fps ∼91% -1%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
89.7 (min: 80) fps ∼91% -1%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
117.7 fps ∼100% +9%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
107.89 fps ∼92%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
105.6 (min: 96) fps ∼90% -2%
Nexoc G734IV
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
104.6 fps ∼89% -3%
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
180.1 fps ∼100% +6%
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
170.21 fps ∼95%
Nexoc G734IV
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
163.5 fps ∼91% -4%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
151.7 (min: 134) fps ∼84% -11%
1024x768 Lowest Preset
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
225.26 fps ∼100%
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
219.7 fps ∼98% -2%
Nexoc G734IV
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
179.7 fps ∼80% -20%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
173 (min: 49) fps ∼77% -23%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 209.61168.68108.7858fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 225.26170.21107.8990.93fps
Doom (2016) 165.35156.26140.21135.76fps

Barulho

Ocioso
30 / 37 / 39 dB
HDD
34 dB
DVD
40 / dB
Carga
44 / 55 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Nexoc G734IV
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Noise
2%
-7%
5%
6%
6%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
31
-3%
29
3%
30
-0%
Idle Minimum *
30
33
-10%
34
-13%
34
-13%
30.4
-1%
30
-0%
Idle Average *
37
34
8%
35
5%
35
5%
32.1
13%
32
14%
Idle Maximum *
39
35
10%
46
-18%
37
5%
32.1
18%
36
8%
Load Average *
44
45
-2%
49
-11%
37
16%
45.6
-4%
43
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
47
43
9%
Load Maximum *
55
52
5%
56
-2%
44
20%
51.5
6%
49
11%

* ... smaller is better

HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Nexoc G734IV
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Heat
11%
10%
19%
7%
22%
Maximum Upper Side *
48
45
6%
48.1
-0%
41.5
14%
51.2
-7%
41
15%
Maximum Bottom *
54
54.3
-1%
59.3
-10%
50.6
6%
56.8
-5%
39.3
27%
Idle Upper Side *
35
29.6
15%
28.2
19%
26.4
25%
29.2
17%
28.8
18%
Idle Bottom *
37
28.6
23%
26
30%
25.4
31%
29.2
21%
27.3
26%

* ... smaller is better

 45 °C46 °C48 °C 
 46 °C46 °C43 °C 
 35 °C36 °C33 °C 
Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 42 °C
54 °C44 °C50 °C
40 °C45 °C37 °C
33 °C35 °C31 °C
Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 41 °C
alimentação elétrica  45 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.441.92533.836.23128.5304032.233.35028.8306325.727.98027.331.210025.630.81252334.516022.44320022.856.725023.562.531520.762.940019.270.150018.672.763018.273.980017.676.410001977.7125017.377.7160017.278.5200017.378.6250017.377.8315017.475.9400017.476.6500017.373.9630017.672.7800017.571.6100001866.61250017.968.21600017.363.3SPL3088.1N1.475.3median 17.9HP Omen 17-an014ngmedian 72.7Delta1.78.937.942.234.836.927.730.132.740.628.630.426.427.629.530.826.131.424.627.922.336.523.755.322.662.320.563.219.562.519.262.91967.818.668.91868.418.363.91970.518.171.118.268.818.470.618.374.718.474.518.577.818.67518.678.818.57618.665.730.8851.562.2median 18.6HP Omen 17-w110ngmedian 68.41.66.633.633.539.942.833.63728.530.62828.825.225.325.837.325.441.32433.424.143.423502351.72157.419.860.919.460.918.660.119.164.41866.21867.817.767.217.866.417.968.717.866.218.161.718.26218641860.71856.31857.217.856.830.577.11.439.4median 18.1Nexoc G734IVmedian 60.926.3hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Omen 17-an014ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HP Omen 17-w110ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Nexoc G734IV audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.7 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 22 / 28 / 35 Watt
Carga midlight 93 / 208 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen 17-an014ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Nexoc G734IV
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Gigabyte P57X v7
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Asus G752VS-BA338T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Power Consumption
9%
24%
9%
-6%
4%
Idle Minimum *
22
19
14%
12
45%
20
9%
15.7
29%
21
5%
Idle Average *
28
25
11%
17
39%
27
4%
23.4
16%
27
4%
Idle Maximum *
35
31
11%
22
37%
31
11%
23.5
33%
32
9%
Load Average *
93
90
3%
86
8%
86
8%
184.6
-98%
86
8%
Load Maximum *
208
193
7%
224
-8%
184
12%
233.1
-12%
206
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
157
165
-5%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
5h 49min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
4h 27min
Blu-ray
0h 00min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 15min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 24min
HP Omen 17-an014ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 86 Wh
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 95 Wh
Nexoc G734IV
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 60 Wh
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 83 Wh
Gigabyte P57X v7
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75.81 Wh
Asus G752VS-BA338T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 90 Wh
Battery Runtime
11%
-7%
-7%
-17%
13%
Reader / Idle
349
432
24%
463
33%
316
-9%
256
-27%
445
28%
H.264
255
233
-9%
195
-24%
228
-11%
257
1%
WiFi v1.3
267
247
-7%
205
-23%
230
-14%
155
-42%
293
10%
Load
84
115
37%
71
-15%
91
8%
98
17%
96
14%

Pro

+ Hardware poderoso
+ Todos os jogos fluentes com 1080p e detalhes no máximo
+ G-Sync
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ Teclas Macro programáveis
+ Decente tela de 120 Hz
+ SSD + HDD decentes

Contra

- Comparativamente pesado
- Sem Optimus
- Alto consumo de energia em modo inativo
- Latências DPC
- Afogamentos com bateria
- Muito barulhento sob carga
The Omen 17-an014ng. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de
The Omen 17-an014ng. Review unit courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

O novo Omen é capaz de se separar de seu próprio antecessor Skylake em mais categorias do que apenas o visual. A HP conseguiu melhorar o modelo do ano passado e eliminou a maioria das queixas, como conectividade, manutenção e touchpad. Além disso, o novo modelo possui um painel compatível com G-Sync de 120 Hz, um SSD rápido, Thunderbolt 3 e teclas macro programáveis para inicializar. E por último, mas não menos importante, o seu desempenho geral foi aumentado em cerca de 10%.

Infelizmente, a virtude do portátil do suporte para G-Sync também é sua maior fraqueza porque significa incompatibilidade inerente com o Nvidia Optimus. Consequentemente, o GTX 1070 está sempre ativo, exigindo muita mais energia, resultando em temperaturas muito mais altas e um nível de ruído maior. De um modo geral, o Omen 7 ficou comparativamente barulhento e quente sob uso intenso. Além disso, encontramos latências dpc e também não gostamos do alto peso do dispositivo. Em troca, o afogamento da CPU / GPU com a bateria não é incomum para portáteis de jogos poderosos, como este.

O Omen 17 é uma substituição de gamer desktop decente. O foco está claramente sobre os entusiastas de jogos, com ênfase em usuários que procuram alto desempenho sem se importar com o peso elevado e a falta de suporte para Optimus.

O novo Omen pode ser adquirido por menos de $2.000, o que o torna um dos portáteis de jogos mais acessíveis em sua classe, disponível hoje em dia.

Alternativas

Entre seus concorrentes, o Asus ROG G752VS-BA338T foi o mais notável. Marcou 86% em nossa extensa análise e superou o novo Omen 17 na maioria das comparações.

Particularmente intrigantes são as baixas temperaturas do Asus e sua emissão de ruído bastante tranquila, apesar do fato de que não tem suporte para Optimus. Foi um pouco mais rápido do que o novo Omen 17 e teve uma duração de bateria superior, para começar.

Em troca, foi o aparelho maior e mais pesado do nosso grupo de teste e, portanto, ainda menos portátil do que o Omen 17. Também sofreu com o bleeding da tela (embora isso dependa muito da tela) e também é mais caro.

HP Omen 17-an014ng - 08/04/2017 v6
Christian Hintze

Acabamento
80 / 98 → 82%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
71 / 81 → 87%
Peso
51 / 66 → 74%
Bateria
77%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
94%
Desempenho da aplicação
95%
Temperatura
83 / 95 → 87%
Ruído
62 / 90 → 69%
Audio
69%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Médio
75%
85%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 17 (7700HQ, GTX 1070, Full-HD)
Christian Hintze, 2017-08-15 (Update: 2017-08-25)