Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion 14: Um polivalente elegante com uma tela brilhante
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Processador
Intel Core i7-1065G7 4 x 1.3 - 3.9 GHz, Ice Lake-U
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1519 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 441.87, Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, Single Channel
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, AUO543D, IPS, Full-HD, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)
Disco rígido
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, 1024 GB
, SSD M.2 NVMe
peso
1.55 kg, Suprimento de energia: 222 g
Preço
1000 EUR
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77.8 % | 01/2020 | HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250 | 1.6 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.9 % | 07/2019 | Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL i5-8265U, GeForce MX250 | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.2 % | 04/2019 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | 1.8 kg | 17.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.6 % | 07/2019 | Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | 1.8 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (17.6 - 205, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (16.8 - 266, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AUO543D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 395 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 375.4 cd/m² Minimum: 28 cd/m²iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 395 cd/m²
Contraste: 1519:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.69 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.78
| HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng AUO543D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL NV140FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L BOE NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus VivoBook S15 S532F LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -40% | -40% | -44% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.5 | 40.1 -40% | 40.02 -40% | 37.12 -44% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.4 | 59.2 -40% | 58.5 -41% | 55.9 -43% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.2 | 41.43 -39% | 41.34 -39% | 38.35 -44% |
| Response Times | 14% | 8% | 39% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 60.8 ? | 39.6 ? 35% | 45 ? 26% | 24.8 ? 59% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29.6 ? | 32 ? -8% | 33 ? -11% | 24 ? 19% |
| PWM Frequency | 352.1 ? | 250 ? | ||
| Screen | -55% | -50% | -69% | |
| Brightness middle | 395 | 316 -20% | 278 -30% | 262.3 -34% |
| Brightness | 375 | 301 -20% | 271 -28% | 250 -33% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 88 -3% | 89 -2% | 89 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.28 -8% | 0.26 -0% | 0.43 -65% |
| Contrast | 1519 | 1129 -26% | 1069 -30% | 610 -60% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.92 | 5.3 10% | 4.73 20% | 5.81 2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.79 | 18.5 -89% | 8.38 14% | 14.7 -50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.91 | 4.8 -427% | 5.17 -468% | 5.36 -489% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.69 | 2.4 64% | 2.59 61% | 2.8 58% |
| Gamma | 2.78 79% | 2.05 107% | 2.38 92% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 7596 86% | 6644 98% | 6160 106% | 7016 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 37.6 -40% | 36 -43% | 35.2 -44% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98 | 58.3 -41% | 58 -41% | 55.6 -43% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -27% /
-43% | -27% /
-41% | -25% /
-51% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 60.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 29.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 31.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø625 (592.25-691)
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø548 (543.22-613.69)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø470 (467.49-492.88)
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø502 (489.9-680.49)
| HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Asus VivoBook S15 S532F WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -22% | -39% | -36% | |
| Write 4K | 181.6 | 157.6 -13% | 130.1 -28% | 149.9 -17% |
| Read 4K | 57.4 | 46.39 -19% | 27.64 -52% | 46.13 -20% |
| Write Seq | 1982 | 1214 -39% | 1438 -27% | 970 -51% |
| Read Seq | 1899 | 1295 -32% | 1319 -31% | 1085 -43% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 509 | 370.7 -27% | 323.3 -36% | 460.8 -9% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 545 | 461.1 -15% | 359.9 -34% | 410.3 -25% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 3072 | 1888 -39% | 1454 -53% | 662 -78% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3281 | 3540 8% | 1740 -47% | 1728 -47% |
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3281 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
3072 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
545 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
509 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1899 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1982 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
57.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
181.6 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4850 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1223 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, i7-1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02: Ø11.2 (7-15)
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23 - 327, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL | |
| HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 56.4 | 33.5 | 18.8 | 10.9 |
| Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 118 | 53.9 | 32.1 | 27 |
| Prey (2017) | 108 | 46.2 | 36.4 | 30.1 |
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 64 | 27 | 19 | 15 |
| ELEX (2017) | 53.9 | 25.4 | 20.6 | 15.6 |
| Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 79.1 | 25.4 | 21.8 | 18.7 |
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 50.7 | 21.9 | 18.7 | 12.7 |
| The Crew 2 (2018) | 43.9 | 20.2 | 19.5 | 16.5 |
| Control (2019) | 41 | 14 | 10.1 | |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 52.9 | 20.7 | 13.4 | 10.2 |
| FIFA 20 (2019) | 120 | 82.4 | 76.8 | 62.5 |
| Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 36 | 19 | 17 | 12 |
| GRID 2019 (2019) | 65.2 | 25.2 | 20.3 | 11.8 |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) | 41.7 | 23.3 | 19.4 | 15.9 |
| Need for Speed Heat (2019) | 41.1 | 20.2 | 18.4 | 15.3 |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 29.4 | 22.5 | 18.1 | |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 20.9 | 15.2 | 9.8 | 6.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31 / 36 / 41 dB |
| Carga |
| 49 / 49 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250 | Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL i5-8265U, GeForce MX250 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 20% | 13% | 16% | 22% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 29.3 2% | 29.9 -0% | 28 7% | 24.1 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31 | 29.3 5% | 29.9 4% | 28 10% | 24.5 ? 21% |
| Idle Average * | 36 | 29.3 19% | 29.9 17% | 28 22% | 25 ? 31% |
| Idle Maximum * | 41 | 29.3 29% | 29.9 27% | 30 27% | 26.5 ? 35% |
| Load Average * | 49 | 34.4 30% | 41.7 15% | 41.4 16% | 39.8 ? 19% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47 | 34.4 27% | 41.5 12% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 49 | 34.9 29% | 41.7 15% | 41.5 15% | 47.4 ? 3% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).
| HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250 | Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL i5-8265U, GeForce MX250 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 5% | -15% | -6% | -5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 41.8 11% | 53.7 -14% | 45.4 3% | 43.9 ? 7% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 47 | 43.3 8% | 56 -19% | 40.8 13% | 46.3 ? 1% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25 | 25.1 -0% | 28.4 -14% | 29.6 -18% | 28.5 ? -14% |
| Idle Bottom * | 26 | 25.4 2% | 28.9 -11% | 31.2 -20% | 29.3 ? -13% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.2 / 0.7 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4 / 7 / 10 Watt |
| Carga |
62 / 64 Watt |
   
| |
| HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250 | Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL i5-8265U, GeForce MX250 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 12% | 1% | -25% | -62% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4 | 2.74 31% | 4.4 -10% | 6 -50% | 7.29 ? -82% |
| Idle Average * | 7 | 5.64 19% | 6.9 1% | 10.3 -47% | 11.8 ? -69% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10 | 8.4 16% | 9.9 1% | 10.5 -5% | 14.6 ? -46% |
| Load Average * | 62 | 61.3 1% | 55 11% | 69.1 -11% | 77.7 ? -25% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 58 | 49.2 15% | 57.8 -0% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 64 | 69.4 -8% | 63.4 1% | 88 -38% | 121 ? -89% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng i7-1065G7, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh | Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 42 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 49% | 31% | 1% | 44% | |
| Reader / Idle | 694 | 1281 85% | 773 11% | 655 -6% | 933 ? 34% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 368 | 505 37% | 414 13% | 306 -17% | 572 ? 55% |
| Load | 69 | 87 26% | 117 70% | 86 25% | 97.7 ? 42% |
| H.264 | 495 | 388 | 710 ? |
Pro
+ Impressão de alta qualidade (materiais, qualidade de construção)
+ Tela brilhante e rica em contraste
+ Dimensões compactas
+ Leve
+ Design elegante
Contra
- Conectividade um pouco escassa
- O teclado poderia ser melhor
- ”Bleeding” da retro iluminação
- Ruído do ventilador irritante
À primeira vista, o Pavilion 14-ce3040ng dá uma boa impressão.
O design elegante, em parte feito de alumínio, nos impressionou por ser leve e compacto. Isso torna o dispositivo particularmente adequado para uso frequente em movimento.
Sua tela brilhante e rica em contraste é outro ponto de venda e diferencia o dispositivo de 14 polegadas da concorrência. Por outro lado, seus dispositivos de entrada, conectividade e duração da bateria são bons o suficiente apenas para a metade do pacote.
No entanto, a HP cometeu um erro decisivo com a curva do ventilador. O ventilador atinge 40 dB(A), mesmo no modo inativo e quase 50 dB(A) sob uso intenso. Em seu estado atual, recomendamos que você procure outra coisa, a menos que não se deixe desanimar por ventiladores irritantes e barulhentos.
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
-
05/14/2020 v7
Florian Glaser
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado
Pricecompare
