Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion 14: Um polivalente elegante com uma tela brilhante

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/28/2020

Um ventilador dominante. Com o Pavilion 14-ce3040ng, a HP está vendendo um portátil multimídia de 1.000 Euros (~US$ 1.109) baseado na nova arquitetura Ice Lake da Intel. Como se viu em nosso teste, o equipamento de 14 polegadas tem várias peculiaridades desnecessárias.

HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Processador
Intel Core i7-1065G7
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 4096 MB, Análises do: 1519 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 441.87, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, Single Channel
Pantalha
14 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, AUO543D, IPS, Full-HD, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)
Disco rígido
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, 1024 GB 
, SSD M.2 NVMe
Placa de Som
Intel Ice Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: COnector combinado para fones e microfone de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18 x 327 x 226
Bateria
41 Wh Lítio-Ion, 3-células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 65 watts, Guia de início rápido, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
1.55 kg, Suprimento de energia: 222 g
Preço
1000 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionBest Price
79%01/2020HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
1065G7, GeForce MX250
1.6 kg18 mm14"1920x1080
85%07/2019Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
8265U, GeForce MX250
1.4 kg15.9 mm14"1920x1080
84%04/2019Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
8565U, GeForce MX250
1.8 kg17.95 mm15.6"1920x1080
83%07/2019Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
8565U, GeForce MX250
1.8 kg18 mm15.6"1920x1080

Device comparison

363.4 mm 243.5 mm 17.95 mm 1.8 kg357.2 mm 230.3 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg327 mm 226 mm 18 mm 1.6 kg323 mm 227 mm 15.9 mm 1.4 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.9 MB/s ∼100% +159%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
69.1 MB/s ∼83% +116%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.2 - 190, n=190)
59.3 MB/s ∼72% +85%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)
33.3 MB/s ∼40% +4%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32 MB/s ∼39%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.9 MB/s ∼100% +172%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.8 MB/s ∼91% +148%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10.2 - 253, n=187)
75.2 MB/s ∼84% +128%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)
35.6 MB/s ∼40% +8%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
33 MB/s ∼37%
359
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
375
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AUO543D
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 395 cd/m² Médio: 375.4 cd/m² Minimum: 28 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 395 cd/m²
Contraste: 1519:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.92 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 0.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.69 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
98% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.78
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
AUO543D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
NV140FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
BOE NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
14%
8%
39%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
60.8 (29.2, 31.6)
39.6 (21.6, 18)
35%
45 (23, 22)
26%
24.8 (12.8, 12)
59%
Response Time Black / White *
29.6 (13.2, 16.4)
32 (18, 14)
-8%
33 (18, 15)
-11%
24 (14, 10)
19%
PWM Frequency
352.1 (99)
250 (90)
Screen
-55%
-50%
-69%
Brightness middle
395
316
-20%
278
-30%
262.3
-34%
Brightness
375
301
-20%
271
-28%
250
-33%
Brightness Distribution
91
88
-3%
89
-2%
89
-2%
Black Level *
0.26
0.28
-8%
0.26
-0%
0.43
-65%
Contrast
1519
1129
-26%
1069
-30%
610
-60%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.92
5.3
10%
4.73
20%
5.81
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.79
18.5
-89%
8.38
14%
14.7
-50%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.91
4.8
-427%
5.17
-468%
5.36
-489%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.69
2.4
64%
2.59
61%
2.8
58%
Gamma
2.78 79%
2.05 107%
2.38 92%
2.15 102%
CCT
7596 86%
6644 98%
6160 106%
7016 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63
37.6
-40%
36
-43%
35.2
-44%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98
58.3
-41%
58
-41%
55.6
-43%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-21% / -44%
-21% / -41%
-15% / -52%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 29.2 ms rise
↘ 31.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13634 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø625 (592.25-691)
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø548 (543.22-613.69)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø470 (467.49-492.88)
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø502 (489.9-680.49)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
190 Points ∼100%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
Intel Core i7-8565U
168 Points ∼88% -12%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U
165 Points ∼87% -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
152 Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (36 - 201, n=390)
130 Points ∼68% -32%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
691 Points ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
600 (min: 548.41, max: 619.74) Points ∼87% -13%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
Intel Core i7-8565U
507 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (72.4 - 1550, n=407)
507 Points ∼73% -27%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U
493 Points ∼71% -29%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
474 Points ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
401 Points ∼85% -15%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U
390 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (62.6 - 481, n=32)
381 Points ∼80% -20%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia
  (148 - 3422, n=33)
1717 Points ∼100% +11%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1543 Points ∼90%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Intel Core i5-8265U
1367 Points ∼80% -11%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
Intel Core i7-8565U
1035 Points ∼60% -33%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
691 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, 1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
4289 Points ∼100%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4236 Points ∼99% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, 8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4192 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, 8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4148 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1144 - 5500, n=120)
4041 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-22%
-39%
-36%
Write 4K
181.6
157.6
-13%
130.1
-28%
149.9
-17%
Read 4K
57.41
46.39
-19%
27.64
-52%
46.13
-20%
Write Seq
1982
1214
-39%
1438
-27%
969.9
-51%
Read Seq
1899
1295
-32%
1319
-31%
1085
-43%
Write 4K Q32T1
509.4
370.7
-27%
323.3
-37%
460.8
-10%
Read 4K Q32T1
544.7
461.1
-15%
359.9
-34%
410.3
-25%
Write Seq Q32T1
3072
1887.9
-39%
1454
-53%
662.4
-78%
Read Seq Q32T1
3281
3540.2
8%
1740
-47%
1728
-47%
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3281 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3072 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 544.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 509.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1899 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1982 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.41 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 181.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
4850 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
1223 pontos
Ajuda
05101520Tooltip
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng GeForce MX250, 1065G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02: Ø11.2 (7-15)
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Multimedia
  (142 - 4734, n=77)
1606 Points ∼100% +45%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
1111 Points ∼69% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
1105 Points ∼69%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
1090 Points ∼68% -1%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
3720 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
3705 Points ∼100% +3%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
3616 Points ∼97% +1%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
3580 Points ∼96%
Average of class Multimedia
  (337 - 16100, n=431)
2991 Points ∼80% -16%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4942 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4756 Points ∼96% +3%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4633 Points ∼94% 0%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
4614 Points ∼93%
Average of class Multimedia
  (352 - 20837, n=656)
3120 Points ∼63% -32%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.8 - 117, n=119)
30.7 fps ∼100% +63%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, 8565U
20.4 fps ∼66% +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, 8265U
19.8 fps ∼64% +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, 8565U
19.1 fps ∼62% +2%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, 1065G7
18.8 (min: 15) fps ∼61%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.2 - 206, n=116)
47.3 fps ∼100% +41%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
GeForce MX250, 8565U
37.9 fps ∼80% +13%
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
GeForce MX250, 8565U
36.8 fps ∼78% +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
GeForce MX250, 8265U
34.5 fps ∼73% +3%
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
GeForce MX250, 1065G7
33.5 (min: 26) fps ∼71%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 56.4 33.5 18.8 10.9 fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 118 53.9 32.1 27 fps
Prey (2017) 108 46.2 36.4 30.1 fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 64 27 19 15 fps
ELEX (2017) 53.9 25.4 20.6 15.6 fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 79.1 25.4 21.8 18.7 fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 50.7 21.9 18.7 12.7 fps
The Crew 2 (2018) 43.9 20.2 19.5 16.5 fps
Control (2019) 41 14 10.1 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 52.9 20.7 13.4 10.2 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 120 82.4 76.8 62.5 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 36 19 17 12 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 65.2 25.2 20.3 11.8 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 41.7 23.3 19.4 15.9 fps
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 41.1 20.2 18.4 15.3 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 29.4 22.5 18.1 fps
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 20.9 15.2 9.8 6.2 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.234.534.132.632.733.62537.543.643.735.836.837.43130.133.53330.129.231.34034.335.432.435.132.835.35039.1323338.627.940.66338.538.140.134.529.438.18035.633.7283427.23510040.228.125.427.725.240.812530.829.126.527.726.83216031.53329.734.22832.220028.727.225.427.623.828.625029.925.124.526.521.730.731528.825.722.322.920.428.640033.425.823.121.119.333.55003325.322.320.719.132.463033.12622.620.817.533.78003426.523.51816.934.110003527.724.417.717.335.2125036.929.326.219.418.436.8160038.930.626.918.217.138.9200039.531.728.617.816.839.7250040.333271816.840.231504128.122.917.916.940.54000392420.717.91739500033.822.419.518.217.333.763003220.418.417.81732800027.11918.318.116.727.11000024.518.618.21816.724.11250023.218.618.218.116.722.51600022.51918.31816.620SPL49.340.336.531.529.749.3N6.53.22.41.71.36.5median 33.1median 26median 23.1median 18.2median 17.3median 33.5Delta4.23.13.232.14.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 36 / 41 dB
Carga
49 / 49 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
1065G7, GeForce MX250
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
8265U, GeForce MX250
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
8565U, GeForce MX250
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
8565U, GeForce MX250
Average of class Multimedia
 
Noise
20%
13%
16%
11%
off / environment *
30
29.3
2%
29.9
-0%
28
7%
31.2 (22 - 304, n=194)
-4%
Idle Minimum *
31
29.3
5%
29.9
4%
28
10%
31.1 (27.8 - 40.1, n=995)
-0%
Idle Average *
36
29.3
19%
29.9
17%
28
22%
31.9 (27.8 - 42.2, n=997)
11%
Idle Maximum *
41
29.3
29%
29.9
27%
30
27%
32.6 (27.8 - 47, n=997)
20%
Load Average *
49
34.4
30%
41.7
15%
41.4
16%
36.5 (28.9 - 51.8, n=997)
26%
Witcher 3 ultra *
47
34.4
27%
41.5
12%
Load Maximum *
49
34.9
29%
41.7
15%
41.5
15%
41.9 (32.5 - 62.7, n=997)
14%

* ... smaller is better

 42 °C47 °C46 °C 
 32 °C45 °C46 °C 
 27 °C31 °C32 °C 
Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 38.7 °C
46 °C47 °C38 °C
42 °C39 °C29 °C
28 °C26 °C25 °C
Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 35.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  45 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-3 °C / -5.4 F).
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
1065G7, GeForce MX250
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
8265U, GeForce MX250
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
8565U, GeForce MX250
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
8565U, GeForce MX250
Average of class Multimedia
 
Heat
5%
-15%
-6%
-6%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
41.8
11%
53.7
-14%
45.4
3%
41.8 (27.2 - 71, n=953)
11%
Maximum Bottom *
47
43.3
8%
56
-19%
40.8
13%
45.1 (28.5 - 82, n=953)
4%
Idle Upper Side *
25
25.1
-0%
28.4
-14%
29.6
-18%
29.6 (21.1 - 40.2, n=805)
-18%
Idle Bottom *
26
25.4
2%
28.9
-11%
31.2
-20%
30.9 (21.5 - 44.4, n=805)
-19%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.730.82536.835.53129.229.74032.836.65027.939.56329.437.38027.235.610025.232.512526.832.51602834.620023.842.725021.75631520.461.440019.367.350019.170.163017.572.580016.967.7100017.369.1125018.472.4160017.176.7200016.873.5250016.872315016.973.240001775.7500017.375.163001773800016.766.61000016.770.11250016.767.91600016.655.3SPL29.785N1.363.7median 17.3median 69.1Delta2.19.432.63028.626.626.826.527.828.124.32823.225.223.52523.232.22135.120.641.121.150.720.653.120.453.620.558.919.861.419.560.318.85718.462.117.561.217.362.516.85716.257.115.956.215.66015.655.115.449.215.241.915.243.61538.714.742.329.370.51.226.6median 17.5median 55.12.48.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion 14-ce3040ngLenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.2 / 0.7 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4 / 7 / 10 Watt
Carga midlight 62 / 64 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
1065G7, GeForce MX250
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
8265U, GeForce MX250
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
8565U, GeForce MX250
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
8565U, GeForce MX250
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
12%
1%
-25%
-86%
Idle Minimum *
4
2.74
31%
4.4
-10%
6
-50%
11.4 (2.1 - 101, n=952)
-185%
Idle Average *
7
5.64
19%
6.9
1%
10.3
-47%
16 (3 - 122, n=952)
-129%
Idle Maximum *
10
8.4
16%
9.9
1%
10.5
-5%
19.5 (4.6 - 181, n=952)
-95%
Load Average *
62
61.3
1%
55
11%
69.1
-11%
60 (18.5 - 164, n=931)
3%
Load Maximum *
64
69.4
-8%
63.4
1%
88
-38%
78.1 (20.1 - 329, n=936)
-22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
58
49.2
15%
57.8
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
11h 34min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 08min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 9min
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng
1065G7, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL
8265U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L
8565U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh
Asus VivoBook S15 S532F
8565U, GeForce MX250, 42 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
49%
31%
1%
-5%
Reader / Idle
694
1281
85%
773
11%
655
-6%
415 (73 - 2085, n=902)
-40%
WiFi v1.3
368
505
37%
414
13%
306
-17%
368 (96 - 942, n=270)
0%
Load
69
87
26%
117
70%
86
25%
85.7 (32 - 238, n=906)
24%
H.264
495
388
366 (114 - 1053, n=111)

Pro

+ Impressão de alta qualidade (materiais, qualidade de construção)
+ Tela brilhante e rica em contraste
+ Dimensões compactas
+ Leve
+ Design elegante

Contra

- Conectividade um pouco escassa
- O teclado poderia ser melhor
- ”Bleeding” da retro iluminação
- Ruído do ventilador irritante
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng laptop review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.
HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng laptop review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

À primeira vista, o Pavilion 14-ce3040ng dá uma boa impressão.

O design elegante, em parte feito de alumínio, nos impressionou por ser leve e compacto. Isso torna o dispositivo particularmente adequado para uso frequente em movimento.

Sua tela brilhante e rica em contraste é outro ponto de venda e diferencia o dispositivo de 14 polegadas da concorrência. Por outro lado, seus dispositivos de entrada, conectividade e duração da bateria são bons o suficiente apenas para a metade do pacote.

No entanto, a HP cometeu um erro decisivo com a curva do ventilador. O ventilador atinge 40 dB(A), mesmo no modo inativo e quase 50 dB(A) sob uso intenso. Em seu estado atual, recomendamos que você procure outra coisa, a menos que não se deixe desanimar por ventiladores irritantes e barulhentos.

HP Pavilion 14-ce3040ng - 01/20/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
75 / 98 → 77%
Teclado
73%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
52 / 80 → 65%
Peso
68 / 20-72 → 93%
Bateria
70 / 95 → 73%
Pantalha
84%
Desempenho do jogos
62 / 90 → 69%
Desempenho da aplicação
90 / 90 → 100%
Temperatura
87%
Ruído
64 / 95 → 67%
Audio
75%
Médio
73%
79%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

HP Pavilion 14
HP Pavilion 14
HP Pavilion 14
HP Pavilion 14
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion 14: Um polivalente elegante com uma tela brilhante
Florian Glaser, 2020-01-28 (Update: 2020-02- 1)