Breve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion 17-x110ng

Name: HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Brand: HP

Multimídia polifuncional de 17 polegadas ! Os portáteis multimídia são sistemas muito versáteis. A HP oferece uma base sólida com um processador Kaby Lake e uma GPU discreta. Como funciona o pacote?

Sebastian Bade, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 02/07/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Laptop / Notebook Kaby Lake Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Pavilion 17-x110ng

Processador

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Placa gráfica

AMD Radeon R7 M440 - 2048 MB VRAM, Análises do: 1021 MHz, Memoría: 1000 MHz, DDR3 (Samsung), AMD: Crimson 16.5; Intel: 21.20.16.4471, Intel HD Graphics 620

Memória

8 GB

, DDR4, 2133 MHz, Single-Channel

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Chi Mei CMN1738, IPS, WLED, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH

Disco rígido

SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, 256 GB

, M.2 2280, 180 GB livre

Placa de Som

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Conexões

2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Fones/microfone combinados, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek PCIe FE Family Controller 10/100 (10MBit/s), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0

Unidade ótica

HP DVDRW GUD1N

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 24.9 x 417 x 279

Bateria

41 Wh, 2550 mAh Lítio-Ion, removeable, Substituível

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, no lado inferior, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, Adaptador de força, HP Audio Switch, HP JumpStart, HP Lounge, McAfee LiveSafe (30 dias de teste), CyberLink PowerDirector, Netflix, 12 Meses Garantia

peso

2.514 kg, Suprimento de energia: 345 g

Preço

699 Euro

Links

HP página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400	67.3 MB/s +254%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE	59 MB/s +211%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1	57.4 MB/s +202%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA	57.3 MB/s +202%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D	52.6 MB/s +177%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng	19 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA	85.3 MB/s +316%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400	81 MB/s +295%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D	80.9 MB/s +295%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE	24.9 MB/s +21%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng	20.5 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	413 MBit/s +710%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	51 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	621 MBit/s +1311%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	44 MBit/s


273 cd/m²	298 cd/m²	265 cd/m²
281 cd/m²	288 cd/m²	285 cd/m²
283 cd/m²	290 cd/m²	302 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Chi Mei CMN1738 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 302 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 285 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 288 cd/m²
Contraste: 472:1 (Preto: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.56 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.95 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Chi Mei CMN1738, , 1920x1080, 17.30	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Innolux N156HGE-EAL, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14.00	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Chi Mei, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		-37%	-30%	26%	-32%	-34%
Display P3 Coverage	63.6	38.57 -39%	42.66 -33%	84.2 32%	41.23 -35%	40.35 -37%
sRGB Coverage	86.5	57.4 -34%	64.1 -26%	99.7 15%	61.4 -29%	60.3 -30%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	63.3	39.89 -37%	44.08 -30%	82.7 31%	42.67 -33%	41.71 -34%
Response Times		13%	-42%	139%	-1%	12%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	41 ?(16, 25)	39 ?(21, 18) 5%	51 ?(18, 33) -24%	44 ?(24, 20, starke Schwankungen mit/ohne PSU) -7%	40.8 ?(22, 18.8) -0%	41 ?(19, 22) -0%
Response Time Black / White *	30 ?(8, 22)	24 ?(19, 5) 20%	38 ?(8, 30) -27%	23 ?(7, 16, Plateau) 23%	30.4 ?(8.4, 22) -1%	23 ?(10, 13) 23%
PWM Frequency	200 ?(90)		50 ?(10) -75%	1000 ?(80) 400%
Screen		-41%	21%	-57%	-14%	-50%
Brightness middle	288	176 -39%	291 1%	234 -19%	244 -15%	240 -17%
Brightness	285	169 -41%	265 -7%	219 -23%	231 -19%	228 -20%
Brightness Distribution	88	91 3%	86 -2%	80 -9%	89 1%	89 1%
Black Level *	0.61	0.47 23%	0.23 62%	0.48 21%	0.37 39%	0.49 20%
Contrast	472	374 -21%	1265 168%	488 3%	659 40%	490 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.56	8.83 -94%	4.78 -5%	11.8 -159%	6.41 -41%	10.96 -140%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.76	14.01 -81%	9.51 -23%	20.69 -167%	13.4 -73%	18.36 -137%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.95	8.97 -81%	3.49 29%	13.3 -169%	5.94 -20%	11.34 -129%
Gamma	2.48 ^89%	2.43 ^91%	2.58 ^85%	2.47 ^89%	2.28 ^96%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	7669 ^85%	10234 ^64%	6013 ^108%	17098 ^38%	6101 ^107%	12292 ^53%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	93	57.3 -38%	64 -31%	100 8%	61.1 -34%	60 -35%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		36.8	40	74	39.3	39
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-22% / -32%	-17% / -2%	36% / -1%	-16% / -16%	-24% / -38%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8 ms rise
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

200 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Intel Core i7-7500U	148 Points +14%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	130 Points
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points -1%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	119 Points -8%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	75 Points -42%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Intel Core i7-7500U	338 Points +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	295 Points -11%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	215 Points -35%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	1.48 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U	1.48 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	1.48 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	1.35 Points -9%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	0.87 Points -41%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	3.7 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U	3.7 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	3.69 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	3.24 Points -12%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	2.59 Points -30%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	6496 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	5829 Points -10%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	14471 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	13058 Points -10%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Intel Core i7-7500U	244.6 Points +15%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	220.8 Points +4%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	213.1 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U	207.2 Points -3%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	201.5 Points -5%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	127.6 Points -40%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U	32356 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	32288 Points
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	32242 Points 0%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	30546 Points -5%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	18921 Points -41%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	2098 ms * -77%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	1216 ms * -2%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	1187 ms *
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U	1164 ms * +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	1140 ms * +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

8207

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

11318

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5001

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

8347 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

14471 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

6496 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.69 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

26.42 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.48 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

331 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

130 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

34.47 fps

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8 | PCMark 7

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Intel Core i7-7500U, 2700 MHz, Liteonit CV3-DE256	3778 Points +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)	3546 Points +14%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	3390 Points +9%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	3162 Points +2%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	3102 Points
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P, 2400 MHz,	2904 Points -6%
Storage Score v2
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	4841 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	2112 Points -56%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	1874 Points -61%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	4429 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)	4389 Points -1%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	3872 Points -13%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	3696 Points -17%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P, 2400 MHz,	3569 Points -19%

PCMark 7
Productivity
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	3953 Points
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P, 2400 MHz,	3062 Points -23%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	1591 Points -60%
Score
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	5035 Points
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P, 2400 MHz,	4340 Points -14%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	3021 Points -40%

PCMark 7 Score		5035 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3102 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4429 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	HP Pavilion 17-x110ng SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Toshiba MQ01ABD100	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Liteonit CV3-DE256	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-92%	40%	-89%	39%	-10%
Read Seq	500	95.3 -81%	469.2 -6%	108.1 -78%	476.5 -5%	503 1%
Write Seq	325.1	85.6 -74%	431.5 33%	105.6 -68%	458.7 41%	316.6 -3%
Read 512	290.2	29.32 -90%	338.3 17%	35.32 -88%	346.4 19%	261.9 -10%
Write 512	300.3	25.93 -91%	297.9 -1%	46.13 -85%	291.1 -3%	281.2 -6%
Read 4k	11.24	0.366 -97%	28.68 155%	0.413 -96%	35.15 213%	17.04 52%
Write 4k	86	0.726 -99%	66.8 -22%	0.9 -99%	78.8 -8%	46.55 -46%
Read 4k QD32	145.4	0.647 -100%	364.7 151%	0.895 -99%	276 90%	125 -14%
Write 4k QD32	272.7	0.722 -100%	245.9 -10%	0.884 -100%	178.3 -35%	131.4 -52%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G

Sequential Read: 500 MB/s

Sequential Write: 325.1 MB/s

512K Read: 290.2 MB/s

512K Write: 300.3 MB/s

4K Read: 11.24 MB/s

4K Write: 86 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 145.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 272.7 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	22439 Points +277%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	21635 Points +263%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P	12483 Points +110%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U	9501 Points +60%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng AMD Radeon R7 M440, Intel Core i5-7200U	5953 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	3574 Points +200%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	3555 Points +199%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P	2209 Points +86%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U	1752 Points +47%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng AMD Radeon R7 M440, Intel Core i5-7200U	1190 Points

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	4251 Points +86%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	4239 Points +86%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P	3775 Points +66%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U	2556 Points +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	2436 Points +7%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng AMD Radeon R7 M440, Intel Core i5-7200U	2280 Points

3DMark 03 Standard		18884 pontos
3DMark 05 Standard		16534 pontos
3DMark 06 Standard Score		8950 pontos
3DMark Vantage P Result		5698 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		2398 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		45093 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5168 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1083 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		547 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		433 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

BioShock Infinite | Rise of the Tomb Raider | Battlefield 4

BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	96.8 fps +130%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	93.3 (18.33^min - 156.07^max) fps +122%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX	53.1 fps +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE NVIDIA GeForce 940MX	48.6 fps +16%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX	42.9 fps +2%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng AMD Radeon R7 M440	42 fps

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	35.8 fps +201%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	31.6 fps +166%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX	13.9 fps +17%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng AMD Radeon R7 M440	11.9 fps

Battlefield 4 - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	81.4 fps +121%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	78.6 fps +113%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX	46.7 fps +27%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX	37.2 fps +1%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng AMD Radeon R7 M440	36.9 fps

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	73.6	42	32.6	9.6
Battlefield 4 (2013)	51.2	36.9	23.3	7.6
GTA V (2015)	50.7	43.7	12.2
The Witcher 3 (2015)	21.1	13.4	6.9
Anno 2205 (2015)	35.3	17.1	7
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)	54	42.9	26.9	20.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	22	11.9	6	3.5
XCOM 2 (2016)	22.8	7.9	5.2	4.9
Far Cry Primal (2016)	20.6	9.9	8.9
The Division (2016)	23.1	15.6	6.2
Doom (2016)	22	13	8.1
Overwatch (2016)	60.5	42.6	22.3	12.4
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	13.9	10.1	5.2
FIFA 17 (2016)	61.8	59.7	34.6	29.7
Mafia 3 (2016)	14	8.9
Battlefield 1 (2016)	31.8	22.7	9.6	9.6
Civilization VI (2016)	36.4	26.1	9.5
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)	69.7	59.3	21.1
Titanfall 2 (2016)	41.1	29.8	11.2
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016)	26.4	22.6	12.1
Dishonored 2 (2016)	10.9	9.2
Watch Dogs 2 (2016)	18.7	13.6
Resident Evil 7 (2017)	40.5	15.9

Barulho

Ocioso		31 / 31 / 31 dB
DVD		35.8 / dB
Carga		33.8 / 44.8 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	HP Pavilion 17-x110ng i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M440	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M	Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX
Noise		2%	-2%	-3%	5%	-5%
off / environment *	29	28.9 -0%	31.6 -9%	31.2 -8%	29 -0%	31.2 -8%
Idle Minimum *	31	30.8 1%	32.6 -5%	32.4 -5%	29 6%	31.7 -2%
Idle Average *	31	30.8 1%	32.6 -5%	33.5 -8%	29 6%	31.9 -3%
Idle Maximum *	31	30.8 1%	32.6 -5%	33.5 -8%	29 6%	31.9 -3%
Load Average *	33.8	33.4 1%	35.3 -4%	35.2 -4%	35.6 -5%	41 -21%
Load Maximum *	44.8	40.1 10%	37.1 17%	38.7 14%	38.5 14%	42.7 5%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


37.5 °C	40.2 °C	24.9 °C
40.3 °C	37.9 °C	25.2 °C
29.3 °C	31.3 °C	24.6 °C

Máximo: 40.3 °C
Médio: 32.4 °C


24 °C	42.5 °C	46.1 °C
24.3 °C	33 °C	42 °C
22.8 °C	27.3 °C	26.6 °C

Máximo: 46.1 °C
Médio: 32.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 43.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.3 °C / 88.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.5 °C / -4.5 F).

	HP Pavilion 17-x110ng i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M440	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M	Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX
Heat		-29%	3%	-27%	-12%	1%
Maximum Upper Side *	40.3	48.1 -19%	38.3 5%	46.6 -16%	43.8 -9%	33.4 17%
Maximum Bottom *	46.1	60.8 -32%	36 22%	65.4 -42%	53 -15%	32.9 29%
Idle Upper Side *	23.8	30.8 -29%	24.9 -5%	28.9 -21%	25.9 -9%	27.7 -16%
Idle Bottom *	23.4	31.9 -36%	25.6 -9%	29.8 -27%	27.1 -16%	29.4 -26%

* ... smaller is better

HP Pavilion 17-x110ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.5 Watt
Ocioso	7.7 / 14 / 15.1 Watt
Carga	33 / 54.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	HP Pavilion 17-x110ng i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M440	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M	Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX
Power Consumption		-2%	24%	-19%	26%	13%
Idle Minimum *	7.7	6 22%	3.9 49%	8.3 -8%	2.7 65%	5.5 29%
Idle Average *	14	8.1 42%	7.4 47%	12.1 14%	5.5 61%	8.2 41%
Idle Maximum *	15.1	9.8 35%	9.5 37%	15.4 -2%	6.5 57%	9.5 37%
Load Average *	33	52.5 -59%	41 -24%	56 -70%	44.2 -34%	44.5 -35%
Load Maximum *	54.6	81.6 -49%	48 12%	70 -28%	65.2 -19%	58 -6%

* ... smaller is better

The battery is replaceable and has a capacity of 41 Wh. — The battery is replaceable and ...

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		8h 47min
WiFi Websurfing (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)		5h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		4h 47min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 30min

	HP Pavilion 17-x110ng 41 Wh	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D 62 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE 30 Wh	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 62 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 45 Wh	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA 41 Wh
Battery Runtime		30%	-21%	31%	51%	-11%
Reader / Idle	527	767 46%		667 27%	1043 98%	560 6%
H.264	287	460 60%		335 17%	503 75%	194 -32%
WiFi v1.3	346	451 30%	275 -21%	386 12%	326 -6%	260 -25%
Load	90	75 -17%		152 69%	124 38%	95 6%

Pro

+ Bom desempenho do sistema graças a um processador veloz

+ Baixa temperatura

+ Sem afogamento térmico do processador

+ Tela com amplos ângulos de visão

+ Tela mate

+ Ruído do sistema moderado

+ Peso baixo, apesar das 17 polegadas

+ Unidade ótica disponível

+ SSD

Contra

- Sem iluminação de teclado

- Não consegue lidar com todos os jogos, apesar da GPU dedicada

- Sem escotilha de manutenção

- Baixo desempenho WLAN

- Apenas 256 GB de armazenamento

- Sem HD

- Leitor de cartões SD muito lento

In review: HP Pavilion 17-x110ng. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

O portátil multimídia de 17 polegadas da HP, o Pavilion 17-x110ng é vendido atualmente por 699 Euros (~$750). Está equipado com uma combinação do processador Intel e placa de vídeo AMD dentro de um discreto chassi de plástico preto. O Intel Core i5-7200U é um moderno chip Kaby Lake, e o eficiente SoC dual-core fornece suficiente desempenho para a maioria de aplicativos multimídia. 8 GB de RAM DDR4 também sçao decentes e não deveria haver problemas, nem mesmo com aplicativos exigentes. A tela IPS fornece amplos ângulos de visão e não podemos determinar um bleeding da iluminação de fundo.

O HP Pavilion 17-x110ng convence com bom desempenho do sistema, mas as capacidades de jogos são limitados devido à lenta placa de vídeo.

A placa de vídeo dedicada é uma bela adição, mas você realmente deveria pensar sobre seus cenários de uso, porque o desempenho somente é suficiente para uma experiência de jogo fluente em baixas resoluções. A solução de armazenamento é boa e ruim ao mesmo tempo. Faz sentido usar um SSD veloz como unidade do sistema, mas 256 GB não serão suficientes para um aparelho multimídia, onde grandes quantidades de dados são basicamente obrigatórios.

HP Pavilion 17-x110ng - 2017-01-24 01/24/2017 v6^(old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento

78 / 98 → 80%

Teclado

78%

Mouse

77%

Conectividade

40 / 81 → 49%

Peso

60 / 20-67 → 84%

Bateria

82%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

58 / 85 → 69%

Desempenho da aplicação

83 / 92 → 90%

Temperatura

93%

Ruído

87 / 95 → 92%

Audio

59%

Camera

42 / 85 → 50%

Médio

71%

79%

Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1612 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion 17-x110ng

Sebastian Bade, 2017-02- 7 (Update: 2017-02-19)