snhb.queue.push(function(){ snhb.addAdditionalAdSlotsToRefresh(additionalAdSlots); }); googletag.enableServices(); }); nbc_pagecall();
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad E495: Dispositivo de escritório barato com muita energia, mas sem iluminação do teclado

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 09/22/2019

The AMD ThinkPad is slowed down in terms of equipment. O ThinkPad E495 oferece mais energia do que o equivalente da Intel com seu SoC AMD Ryzen, mas o portátil de baixo preço é desnecessariamente reduzido pelo fabricante em termos de equipamento.

Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
Processador
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
Memória
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2666 limitado a 2400, 2 slots, máx. 64 GB
Pantalha
14 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, N140HCA-EAC, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
AMD CZ FCH
Disco rígido
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG, , 213 GB livre
Placa de Som
AMD Raven - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector estéreo de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19.9 x 329 x 242
Bateria
45 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 de 1,5W estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, Adaptador de força USB-C de 65W, Lenovo Vantage, McAfee, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.787 kg, Suprimento de energia: 345 g
Preço
660 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.8 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
78.3 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
74.8 MB/s ∼95% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.8 MB/s ∼94% -6%
Average of class Office
  (10.2 - 191, n=280)
62.6 MB/s ∼79% -21%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
90.3 MB/s ∼100% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
87.7 MB/s ∼97%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.4 MB/s ∼95% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.8 MB/s ∼92% -6%
Average of class Office
  (9.5 - 255, n=255)
78.9 MB/s ∼87% -10%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
648 MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
626 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
580 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Average of class Office
  (5 - 1334, n=226)
476 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
304 MBit/s ∼47% -53%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
681 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
652 MBit/s ∼96% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
621 MBit/s ∼91%
Average of class Office
  (34 - 1176, n=226)
452 MBit/s ∼66% -27%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
332 MBit/s ∼49% -47%
253
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
215
cd/m²
241
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
191
cd/m²
230
cd/m²
213
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
N140HCA-EAC
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 255 cd/m² Médio: 230 cd/m² Minimum: 2.8 cd/m²
iluminação: 75 %
iluminação com acumulador: 244 cd/m²
Contraste: 1418:1 (Preto: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 4.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
63.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 40.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
N140HCA-EAC, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00
N140HCG-GQ2, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE
B140HAN04.2, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
Lenovo NV140FHM-N49, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
B140HAN04.2, , 1920x1080, 14
Response Times
25%
-3%
-46%
-10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40.8 (22, 18.8)
32.4 (16.4, 16)
21%
44 (22, 22)
-8%
48.4 (25.2, 23.2)
-19%
44.8 (20.4, 24.4)
-10%
Response Time Black / White *
30.8 (17.6, 13.2)
15.2 (6.8, 8.4)
51%
30 (17.2, 12.8)
3%
38.4 (21.2, 17.2)
-25%
33.6 (18, 15.6)
-9%
PWM Frequency
25000 (40)
26040 (50)
4%
1250 (99)
-95%
Screen
35%
-0%
0%
-1%
Brightness middle
241
420
74%
278
15%
305
27%
289
20%
Brightness
230
391
70%
257
12%
295
28%
271
18%
Brightness Distribution
75
88
17%
85
13%
90
20%
87
16%
Black Level *
0.17
0.29
-71%
0.19
-12%
0.23
-35%
0.19
-12%
Contrast
1418
1448
2%
1463
3%
1326
-6%
1521
7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.7
2.1
55%
5.1
-9%
5.3
-13%
5.6
-19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
19.7
5.5
72%
19.3
2%
18.9
4%
20.8
-6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.2
0.7
83%
4.5
-7%
5
-19%
4.7
-12%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.6
3.4
-31%
2.7
-4%
2.3
12%
2.7
-4%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.22 99%
2.21 100%
2.09 105%
1.96 112%
CCT
6507 100%
7168 91%
6685 97%
6246 104%
6506 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
40.3
63.5
58%
37.1
-8%
37.7
-6%
37.2
-8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
63.3
98.6
56%
58.4
-8%
58.2
-8%
58.5
-8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
30% / 33%
-2% / -1%
-23% / -10%
-6% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 25000 Hz ≤ 40 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9347 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
Intel Core i5-8265U
160 Points ∼100% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
144 Points ∼90% +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
  (137 - 147, n=9)
142 Points ∼89% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
140 Points ∼88%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
139.52 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Office
  (20 - 199, n=538)
112 Points ∼70% -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
658 (min: 656.79, max: 659.13) Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
  (491 - 665, n=9)
631 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
618 (min: 591.81, max: 618.71) Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
611 Points ∼93% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
Intel Core i5-8265U
509 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Office
  (36 - 1050, n=545)
345 Points ∼52% -48%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Ryzen 5 3500U: Ø658 (656.79-659.13)
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00 AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U: Ø576 (569.82-610.73)
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø487 (483.41-509.01)
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U: Ø598 (591.81-618.71)
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
658 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
39.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
140 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00
Vega 8, PRO 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3392 Points ∼100% +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (2989 - 3466, n=8)
3268 Points ∼96% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Vega 8, 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3014 Points ∼89% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
Vega 8, 3500U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG
2989 Points ∼88%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), 8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
2892 Points ∼85% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG
2693 Points ∼79% -10%
Average of class Office
  (320 - 3884, n=155)
2658 Points ∼78% -11%
Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG
6339 Points ∼100% +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00
Vega 8, PRO 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5896 Points ∼93% +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (5456 - 6074, n=8)
5781 Points ∼91% +5%
Average of class Office
  (1266 - 7964, n=155)
5490 Points ∼87% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
Vega 8, 3500U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG
5485 Points ∼87%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Vega 8, 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4964 Points ∼78% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), 8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
3747 Points ∼59% -32%
Essentials
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00
Vega 8, PRO 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7556 Points ∼100% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG
7529 Points ∼100% +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (6690 - 8300, n=8)
7499 Points ∼99% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
Vega 8, 3500U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG
7008 Points ∼93%
Average of class Office
  (2683 - 9790, n=155)
6983 Points ∼92% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Vega 8, 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6646 Points ∼88% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), 8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
5776 Points ∼76% -18%
Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00
Vega 8, PRO 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3818 Points ∼100% +10%
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (3485 - 3972, n=8)
3736 Points ∼98% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
UHD Graphics 620, 8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG
3617 Points ∼95% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
Vega 8, 3500U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG
3485 Points ∼91%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
Vega 8, 2500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3321 Points ∼87% -5%
Average of class Office
  (803 - 4597, n=156)
3276 Points ∼86% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), 8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G
2846 Points ∼75% -18%

» No benchmarks for this notebook found!

SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1645.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 819.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 334.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 266.97 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1098.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 813.77 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.24 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 121.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8565U
5107 Points ∼100% +74%
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
3535 Points ∼69% +20%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (1668 - 4317, n=29)
3308 Points ∼65% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
2940 Points ∼58%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
2757 Points ∼54% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1666 Points ∼33% -43%
Average of class Office
  (185 - 5332, n=662)
1323 Points ∼26% -55%
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8565U
3586 Points ∼100% +96%
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
2344 Points ∼65% +28%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (1095 - 2901, n=26)
2092 Points ∼58% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
1834 Points ∼51%
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
1647 Points ∼46% -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1071 Points ∼30% -42%
Average of class Office
  (138 - 4109, n=481)
1017 Points ∼28% -45%
3DMark 11 Performance
3013 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1639 pontos
Ajuda
The Witcher 3
1366x768 The Witcher 3 medium
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (16.4 - 24, n=4)
20 fps ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (5.8 - 50.3, n=57)
18.2 fps ∼91%
1920x1080 The Witcher 3 high
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (9.2 - 14, n=7)
11.2 fps ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (3.1 - 31.7, n=49)
11 fps ∼98%
1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra
Average of class Office
  (1.9 - 16.4, n=29)
7.31 fps ∼100%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (6.3 - 6.9, n=2)
6.6 fps ∼90%
3840x2160 The Witcher 3 4K
1024x768 The Witcher 3 low
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (22 - 42.3, n=9)
32.8 fps ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (8.3 - 81.7, n=90)
24.2 fps ∼74%
3840x2160 The Witcher 3 4K ultra
1280x800 Lightsmark - 1280x800
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (122 - 122, n=28)
122 ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (122 - 122, n=1033)
122 ∼100%
1280x800 Lightsmark - 1280x800
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (123 - 123, n=28)
123 ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (123 - 123, n=1033)
123 ∼100%
1280x720 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (148 - 148, n=28)
148 ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (148 - 148, n=1033)
148 ∼100%
1280x768 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (149 - 149, n=28)
149 ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (149 - 149, n=1033)
149 ∼100%
1366x768 3DMark 06 - Standard 1366x768
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (229 - 229, n=28)
229 ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (229 - 229, n=1033)
229 ∼100%
1600x900 Crysis CPU - 1600x900 High
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (230 - 230, n=28)
230 ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (230 - 230, n=1033)
230 ∼100%
1600x900 Crysis CPU - 1600x900 Med
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (231 - 231, n=28)
231 ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (231 - 231, n=1033)
231 ∼100%
1600x900 Crysis CPU - 1600x900 Low
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (232 - 232, n=28)
232 ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (232 - 232, n=1033)
232 ∼100%
1600x900 Crysis GPU - 1600x900 High
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (233 - 233, n=28)
233 ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (233 - 233, n=1033)
233 ∼100%
1600x900 Crysis GPU - 1600x900 Med
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (234 - 234, n=28)
234 ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (234 - 234, n=1033)
234 ∼100%
1600x900 Crysis GPU - 1600x900 Low
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
  (235 - 235, n=28)
235 ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (235 - 235, n=1033)
235 ∼100%
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 81.9 14.3 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 64 54.5 28.3 27.2 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 23.8 17.3 15.2 fps

Barulho

Ocioso
29.3 / 29.3 / 29.3 dB
Carga
32.8 / 34.5 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29.3 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.427.728.531.62526.425.624.926.93128.226.828.430.74026.228.526.427.75025.624.422.925.1632426.123.527.58023.523.522.327.210024.623.323.424.212523.622.423.522.516022.921.321.622.120022.722.220.822.125022.52121.221.831522.220.820.72240021.320.419.623.450022.620.119.523.463022.620.619.323.480021.620.618.523.1100020.319.317.922125020.719.617.423.2160021.118.61723.2200021.518.416.723.4250021.718.816.723.9315020.118.715.922.6400019.817.415.822.1500022.116.415.923630018.115.61621800016.315.616.417.91000015.715.415.316.21250015.21515.215.51600014.914.91515SPL32.830.629.334.5N1.81.41.22.1median 21.5median 19.3median 17.4median 22.5Delta1.51.82.11.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
Carga Máxima
 44.4 °C43.2 °C41.6 °C 
 40.2 °C40.3 °C38.7 °C 
 28.7 °C29.4 °C29.3 °C 
Máximo: 44.4 °C
Médio: 37.3 °C
42.8 °C48.9 °C46.4 °C
40.6 °C47.7 °C47.2 °C
26.8 °C28.2 °C27.6 °C
Máximo: 48.9 °C
Médio: 39.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  38.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.9 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-1.3 °C / -2.3 F).
Heat map of the top of the device (stress test)
Heat map of the top of the device (stress test)
Heat map of the bottom of the device (stress test)
Heat map of the bottom of the device (stress test)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.527.92524.926.83128.429.94026.4305022.927.26323.531.58022.325.210023.426.112523.528.616021.637.720020.844.425021.248.731520.751.940019.655.850019.559.763019.360.980018.564.3100017.962.9125017.457.416001755.7200016.754.5250016.755.5315015.957.7400015.859.4500015.956.763001652800016.4561000015.353.41250015.254.4160001544.5SPL29.370.4N1.227.2median 17.4median 55.5Delta2.15.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.41 / 0.54 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 4.1 / 5.86 / 6.36 Watt
Carga midlight 30.4 / 50 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
3500U, Vega 8, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00
PRO 3500U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE
8565U, Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), Toshiba KBG30ZMT512G, , 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8
 
Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
-25%
-67%
10%
-33%
-27%
-62%
Idle Minimum *
4.1
5.1
-24%
6.8
-66%
2.76
33%
6.2
-51%
5.26 (3.7 - 7.6, n=27)
-28%
7.56 (2.34 - 32, n=973)
-84%
Idle Average *
5.86
7.7
-31%
9.4
-60%
5.96
-2%
8.6
-47%
8.16 (5.86 - 12.9, n=27)
-39%
11.4 (4.2 - 42, n=973)
-95%
Idle Maximum *
6.36
10.7
-68%
12.4
-95%
6.57
-3%
9.7
-53%
9.85 (6.36 - 13.7, n=27)
-55%
13.8 (5 - 67, n=973)
-117%
Load Average *
30.4
35.8
-18%
57.2
-88%
28.2
7%
37.4
-23%
37.5 (24.1 - 50.6, n=27)
-23%
37.2 (7.43 - 99.3, n=958)
-22%
Load Maximum *
50
43.2
14%
63.1
-26%
43.6
13%
44.8
10%
44.3 (26.5 - 61.6, n=27)
11%
46 (12.2 - 129, n=960)
8%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
8h 17min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 52min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 33min
Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE
3500U, Vega 8, 45 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T495-20NKS01Y00
PRO 3500U, Vega 8, 50 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N90004GE
8565U, Radeon RX 550X (Laptop),  Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E485-20KU000NGE
2500U, Vega 8, 45 Wh
Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
30%
-6%
22%
-32%
-12%
H.264
472
708
50%
492
4%
687
46%
341
-28%
437 (139 - 862, n=184)
-7%
WiFi v1.3
497
544
9%
419
-16%
485
-2%
323
-35%
417 (105 - 1104, n=356)
-16%

Pro

+ Tela IPS mate brilhante e de alto contraste
+ Carcaça estável
+ Excelente teclado
+ Bom substituto do mouse
+ Bom desempenho; mais rápido que o Intel E490
+ SSD NVMe
+ Slot para uma unidade de disco rígido de 2,5 polegadas
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Baixo consumo de energia
+ Funciona de forma muito silenciosa

Contra

- Tela bastante escura
- Altos desvios de cores e baixa cobertura do espaço de cores
- Sem HDMI 2.0
- Sem iluminação de teclado ou leitor de digitais, nem sequer com custo extra
- Apenas 12 meses de garantia
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad E495. Test model provided by
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad E495. Test model provided by

O Lenovo ThinkPad E495 é um portátil de escritório sólido por pouco dinheiro. Por menos de 700 Euros (~US$ 770), você recebe uma carcaça estável, ótimos dispositivos de entrada, muita energia e uma bateria decente. A comparação com o modelo Intel também mostra que a Lenovo limita um pouco artificialmente o E495. O plástico na superfície da unidade base parece muito mais barato com seu revestimento áspero e não entendemos por que não há iluminação no teclado ou um leitor de digitais nem mesmo a um custo extra.

O desempenho do SoC Ryzen é muito bom e a CPU e a GPU obtêm uma pontuação melhor que a do Intel Core i5. No entanto, a Radeon RX 550X (opcional) dedicada no ThinkPad E490 oferece visivelmente mais potência gráfica e, portanto, é recomendada se você também quiser usar o ThinkPad para jogos. Nem o E490 nem o E495 oferecem Thunderbolt 3, portanto, a conexão de uma eGPU não é possível. Para explorar todo o potencial do SoC AMD, você também precisa de outro módulo de RAM.

Bom valor pelo dinheiro: O ThinkPad E495 oferece mais energia do que o modelo Intel um pouco mais caro e não possui mais desvantagens em termos de duração da bateria. No entanto, deve-se aceitar a falta de recursos (especialmente a iluminação do teclado) e o plástico mais barato.

Atenção: Desde a análise do ThinkPad E490, atualizamos nosso sistema de pontuação para a versão 7 (veja Aqui). Isso reduz a classificação do E490 de 89% para 86%. O ThinkPad E485 atinge 84%. A discrepância, conforme listamos neste artigo, resulta das diferenças no equipamento e do material da carcaça.

Lenovo ThinkPad E495-20NE000JGE - 09/16/2019 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento
83 / 98 → 85%
Teclado
88%
Mouse
88%
Conectividade
61 / 80 → 76%
Peso
66 / 20-75 → 83%
Bateria
77%
Pantalha
81%
Desempenho do jogos
55 / 78 → 70%
Desempenho da aplicação
79 / 95 → 83%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
97%
Audio
61%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Médio
74%
84%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad E495: Dispositivo de escritório barato com muita energia, mas sem iluminação do teclado
Andreas Osthoff, 2019-09-22 (Update: 2019-09-30)