Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil PC Specialist Proteus V (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1060, Full HD)

Novo lançamento. A PC Specialist, um revendedor de hardware no Reino Unido, recentemente começou a vender seus portáteis de jogos na Alemanha via pczentrum.de. Temos em nossas mãos o Proteus V, um portátil de 15 polegadas por cerca de 1400 Euros (~$1660), e estamos testando seus limites.
PC Zentrum Proteus V
Processador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 388.59
Memória
16 GB 
, DDR4-2133 SO-DIMM, single-channel, 1 de 2 slots utilizados, máx. 32 GB
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOEhydis NV156FHM-N42 (BOE06C6), IPS, 60 Hz, FHD, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM175 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, NVMe SSD, slots: 1x M.2 2280 (PCIe ou SATA III) & 1x 2.5-polegadas
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: combinação (fones + microfone), Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 29 x 385 x 267
Bateria
7180 mAh Lítio-Ion, 6 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.1, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 200 W, manual, DVD de controladores, DVD de Windows, BullGuard Internet Security Trial, MS Office 365 Trial, 36 Meses Garantia
peso
2.576 kg, Suprimento de energia: 845 g
Preço
1405 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

385 mm 267 mm 29 mm 2.6 kg380 mm 269 mm 34 mm 2.6 kg391 mm 266 mm 22.5 mm 2.5 kg386 mm 262 mm 25.1 mm 2.6 kg380 mm 249 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
PC Zentrum Proteus V
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s -6%
Gigabyte P55W v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s -11%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.59 MB/s -72%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
 
22.7 MB/s -73%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
PC Zentrum Proteus V
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s
Gigabyte P55W v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s -2%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
 
27.2 MB/s -69%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
20.96 MB/s -76%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
618 MBit/s +19%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
594 MBit/s +14%
PC Zentrum Proteus V
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
520 MBit/s
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
470 MBit/s -10%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
373 MBit/s -28%
iperf3 receive AX12
PC Zentrum Proteus V
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
686 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
664 MBit/s -3%
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
663 MBit/s -3%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s -3%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
541 MBit/s -21%
252
cd/m²
239
cd/m²
243
cd/m²
242
cd/m²
242
cd/m²
236
cd/m²
214
cd/m²
228
cd/m²
218
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOEhydis NV156FHM-N42 (BOE06C6) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 252 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 234.9 cd/m² Minimum: 36 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 242 cd/m²
Contraste: 1152:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.27 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.17 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.42% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.13% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
PC Zentrum Proteus V
BOEhydis NV156FHM-N42 (BOE06C6), 1920x1080, 15.60
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.60
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
3840x2160, 15.60
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
LG Display LP156WF6-SPP1, 1920x1080, 15.60
Gigabyte P55W v7
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
52%
24%
56%
50%
Display P3 Coverage
39.13
64.3
64%
48.21
23%
65.8
68%
63.5
62%
sRGB Coverage
58
83
43%
72.6
25%
85.1
47%
82
41%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
40.42
60.6
50%
49.81
23%
62.2
54%
59.9
48%
Response Times
13%
-2%
18%
34%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
52.8 ?(25.2, 27.6)
40.8 ?(20.4, 20.4)
23%
28 ?(15.6, 12.4)
47%
41 ?(21, 20)
22%
37 ?(15, 22)
30%
Response Time Black / White *
39.6 ?(22.4, 17.2)
30.4 ?(16.4, 14)
23%
23.6 ?(15.2, 8.4)
40%
34 ?(21, 13)
14%
25 ?(5, 20)
37%
PWM Frequency
21930 ?(95)
20490 ?(95)
-7%
1351 ?(39)
-94%
Screen
-11%
-59%
-2%
-6%
Brightness middle
242
297
23%
274.2
13%
322
33%
287
19%
Brightness
235
276
17%
263
12%
297
26%
289
23%
Brightness Distribution
85
87
2%
92
8%
86
1%
87
2%
Black Level *
0.21
0.3
-43%
0.44
-110%
0.31
-48%
0.29
-38%
Contrast
1152
990
-14%
623
-46%
1039
-10%
990
-14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.27
5.25
-23%
8
-87%
4.73
-11%
4.92
-15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.09
10.3
-45%
14.6
-106%
12.37
-74%
11
-55%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.17
4.64
-114%
9.1
-319%
2.99
-38%
3.66
-69%
Gamma
2.38 92%
2.39 92%
2.24 98%
2.32 95%
2.32 95%
CCT
6912 94%
6600 98%
5020 129%
6905 94%
6482 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37
54
46%
45.7
24%
56
51%
54
46%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58
83
43%
72.1
24%
85
47%
82
41%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
18% / 6%
-12% / -33%
24% / 12%
26% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.4 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25.2 ms rise
↘ 27.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 21930 Hz ≤ 95 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 21930 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 95 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 21930 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
162 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points +10%
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points +7%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points +4%
PC Zentrum Proteus V
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
146 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points +1%
PC Zentrum Proteus V
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
734 Points
Gigabyte P55W v7
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
722 Points -2%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
673 (660min - 673max) Points -8%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points +9%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.77 Points +7%
PC Zentrum Proteus V
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.66 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.18 Points 0%
PC Zentrum Proteus V
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.16 Points
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.11 Points -1%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.66 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.16 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
146 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
734 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
PC Zentrum Proteus V
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4916 Points
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
4626 Points -6%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4141 Points -16%
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D256
4013 Points -18%
PCMark 10 - Score
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
5134 Points +32%
PC Zentrum Proteus V
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3904 Points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4916 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
3904 pontos
Ajuda
PC Zentrum Proteus V
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 250GB m.2 NVMe
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035
Gigabyte P55W v7
Liteonit CV3-8D256
AS SSD
20%
26%
-68%
Seq Read
2541
2678
5%
2719
7%
514
-80%
Seq Write
1180
1172
-1%
1550
31%
328.1
-72%
4K Read
51
46.56
-9%
48.01
-6%
23.34
-54%
4K Write
136.4
142.9
5%
127.6
-6%
48.47
-64%
Score Read
1472
1639
11%
1549
5%
393
-73%
Score Write
677
1323
95%
1468
117%
248
-63%
Score Total
2842
3728
31%
3756
32%
840
-70%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3325 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1203 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 560 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 444.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1997 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1186 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 157.4 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
PC Zentrum Proteus V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11920 Points
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11494 Points -4%
Gigabyte P55W v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11426 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11322 Points -5%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
11261 Points -6%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
PC Zentrum Proteus V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
15386 Points
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14942 Points -3%
Gigabyte P55W v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14693 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14471 Points -6%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
14450 Points -6%
3DMark 11 Performance
12205 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
143270 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
26044 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10010 pontos
Ajuda
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
PC Zentrum Proteus V
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
39.9 fps
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
39.4 fps -1%
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
38.4 fps -4%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
38.3 fps -4%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
38.2 fps -4%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
76 fps +5%
PC Zentrum Proteus V
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
72.2 fps
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
70.4 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
69.6 fps -4%
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
68 fps -6%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 72.2 39.9
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 68 52
The Evil Within 2 (2017) 43.4 41.8
ELEX (2017) 68.1 51.9
Destiny 2 (2017) 94.1 78.4
Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus (2017) 77.4 70.7
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 57 47
Call of Duty WWII (2017) 93.8 70.4
Need for Speed Payback (2017) 77.8 73.7
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 80.6 62.3

Barulho

Ocioso
37 / 38 / 39 dB
Carga
47 / 52 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
PC Zentrum Proteus V
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Noise
12%
10%
11%
9%
off / environment *
31
29
6%
28.8
7%
30.4
2%
30
3%
Idle Minimum *
37
31
16%
33.1
11%
30.9
16%
33
11%
Idle Average *
38
32
16%
33.1
13%
30.9
19%
34
11%
Idle Maximum *
39
34
13%
34
13%
31.5
19%
35
10%
Load Average *
47
41
13%
37.2
21%
40.7
13%
39
17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43
39
9%
46.1
-7%
45.5
-6%
Load Maximum *
52
47
10%
47.1
9%
43.9
16%
50
4%

* ... smaller is better

 44 °C43 °C44 °C 
 41 °C41 °C38 °C 
 29 °C31 °C29 °C 
Máximo: 44 °C
Médio: 37.8 °C
52 °C53 °C41 °C
33 °C46 °C35 °C
23 °C25 °C23 °C
Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 36.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  42 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
PC Zentrum Proteus V
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Heat
-23%
0%
-6%
8%
Maximum Upper Side *
44
53
-20%
51.9
-18%
49.6
-13%
Maximum Bottom *
53
61
-15%
54.6
-3%
47.7
10%
Idle Upper Side *
29
35
-21%
28.4
2%
29.1
-0%
23.6
19%
Idle Bottom *
29
39
-34%
29.6
-2%
29.3
-1%
24.6
15%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.642.1253339.83129.831.54030.638.25026.932.96325.728.68027.63310026.432.912524.53216022.242.820021.450.425021.85531520.858.340020.658.350020.158.963019.554.580019.250.3100019.154.5125018.852.6160018.851.420001950.4250018.647.3315018.754.4400018.853500018.649.7630018.449.6800018.6471000018.645.11250018.740.91600018.330.8SPL31.164.6N1.520.2median 19median 50.4Delta1.46.44345.436.739.929.431.834.140.527.23024.829.525.738.825.439.822.234.221.644.222.748.822.452.519.853.118.350.817.361.117.269.517.172.716.866.316.863.516.960.416.858.717.155.51751.216.95317.153.517.156.617.258.517.554.117.843.417.134.929.475.31.232.1median 17.2median 53.51.16.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoisePC Zentrum Proteus VSCHENKER XMG Core 15
PC Zentrum Proteus V audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Core 15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 0.9 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 28 / 32 / 38 Watt
Carga midlight 91 / 152 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
PC Zentrum Proteus V
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
Power Consumption
14%
28%
35%
41%
Idle Minimum *
28
18
36%
14.5
48%
7.2
74%
8
71%
Idle Average *
32
22
31%
17.3
46%
10.5
67%
13
59%
Idle Maximum *
38
26
32%
17.4
54%
16
58%
18
53%
Load Average *
91
93
-2%
93
-2%
82
10%
76
16%
Witcher 3 ultra *
124
119
4%
128.8
-4%
124
-0%
Load Maximum *
152
175
-15%
155
-2%
143
6%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
3h 41min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 20min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 29min
PC Zentrum Proteus V
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ,  Wh
SCHENKER XMG Core 15
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 82 Wh
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 65 Wh
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 69 Wh
Gigabyte P55W v7
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 63 Wh
Battery Runtime
22%
26%
90%
115%
Reader / Idle
221
300
36%
386
75%
501
127%
789
257%
H.264
200
234
17%
WiFi v1.3
196
282
44%
232
18%
357
82%
346
77%
Load
89
80
-10%
75
-16%
144
62%
98
10%

Pro

+ Carcaça de alumínio elegante
+ Alto contraste e ângulos de visualização decentes
+ Extensas opções de iluminação
+ Individualmente configurável
+ Temperaturas moderadas
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Sem bloatware
+ Excelente desempenho
+ DVD de Windows

Contra

- Baixo brilho, espaço de cor inferior, tempos de resposta lentos
- Nem G-Sync nem Optimus
- Controle pobre da ventoinha
- Capacidade de manutenção pobre
- Duração pobre da bateria
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
- Pobre qualidade do som
Proteus V. Review unit courtesy of PC Zentrum
Proteus V. Review unit courtesy of PC Zentrum

Se a duração da bateria não é importante e nem os alto-falantes internos para ouvir música, assistir filmes ou jogar, então o Proteus V da PC Specialist pode ser uma alternativa viável a um preço justo. Além da elegante carcaça feita parcialmente de alumínio, também gostamos dos dispositivos de entrada.

Seu desempenho geral é mais do que decente. Equipado com 16 GB de RAM DDR4 e um SSD, o Proteus V pode facilmente acompanhar o nível da Acer, Asus ou MSI. Os jogos modernos funcionam sem problemas na resolução FHD nativa do dispositivo de 1920x1080 graças ao processador Core i7-7700HQ e placa de vídeo GTX 1060.

Infelizmente, a tela FHD mostrou-se bastante pobre. Apesar de sua alta relação de contraste e baixo nível de preto, ela simplesmente não é suficientemente brilhante para deixar uma impressão positiva duradoura e sofre de cobertura de espaço de cores pobre, para iniciar. Os controles de velocidade do ventilador precisam de uma renovação maciça o mais rápido possível. As baixas temperaturas do dispositivo são um sinal de ventoinhas muito agressivas; As ventoinhas têm o potencial de irritar os usuários do portátil com bastante rapidez. Esperemos que a PC Specialist melhore isso com uma futura atualização do BIOS.

Assim, no momento da redação, preferimos recomendar o um pouco mais quente e significativamente mais silencioso Schenker XMG Core 15 apesar de sua falta de brilhantes superfícies metálicas. Outros concorrentes de 15 polegadas podem ser encontrados em nossa Lista dos Top 10 (portáteis) https://www.notebookcheck.net/Notebookcheck-s-Top-10-Gaming-Laptops.98628.0.html e a pagina de benchmarks da GTX 1060.

PC Zentrum Proteus V - 12/16/2017 v6(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
76 / 98 → 78%
Teclado
79%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
61 / 81 → 75%
Peso
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Bateria
70%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
93%
Desempenho da aplicação
95%
Temperatura
86 / 95 → 91%
Ruído
56 / 90 → 62%
Audio
60%
Médio
75%
82%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil PC Specialist Proteus V (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1060, Full HD)
Florian Glaser, 2017-12-23 (Update: 2018-01- 5)