Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Nexoc G739 (Clevo N870HK1)

Andreas Osthoff (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/11/2017

Grande gamer de nível de entrada. O Nexoc G739 é um portátil de 17,3 polegadas com um potente Kaby Lake Core-i7 e a nova GPU Pascal GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. Mas o lado negativo do bom desempenho são suas altas emissões.

Nexoc G739
Processador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) - 4096 MB, Análises do: 1493 MHz, Memoría: 3500 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 378.92, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, 2/2 slots ocupados, máx. 32 GB
Pantalha
17.3 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 127 PPI, CMN1738, IPS, Full HD, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM175
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, m.2-SSD Typ 2280 PCIe 3.0 x4 + Seagate Mobile ST1000LM035, 1TB HDD @5400 rpm, 2.5 Inch
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC269
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm head phone jack, 3.5 mm microphone jack , Card Reader: 6-em-1 (MMC, RSMMC, SD, Mini SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, TPM 2.0
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 27 x 419 x 289
Bateria
62 Wh Lítio-Ion, bateria de 6 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2.0 MP
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Stereo, Sound Blaster Cinema 3, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de energia de 120 Watts, DVD com controladores, Control Center, MS Office (versão de teste), 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.865 kg, Suprimento de energia: 464 g
Preço
1360 EUR

 

Size Comparison

Front: no connections
Front: no connections
Right: head phones, microphone, USB 2.0, USB 3.0
Right: head phones, microphone, USB 2.0, USB 3.0
Links: Kensington Lock, power supply, RJ45-LAN, 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2, HDMI, USB Typ-C (Gen1), USB 3.0, SD-card reader
Links: Kensington Lock, power supply, RJ45-LAN, 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2, HDMI, USB Typ-C (Gen1), USB 3.0, SD-card reader
Back: no connections
Back: no connections
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
674 MBit/s ∼100% +52%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
666 MBit/s ∼99% +50%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
443 MBit/s ∼66%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
345 MBit/s ∼51% -22%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Wireless-AC 7265
543 MBit/s ∼100% +40%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
524 MBit/s ∼97% +35%
Nexoc G739
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
388 MBit/s ∼71%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
294 MBit/s ∼54% -24%
277
cd/m²
324
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 324 cd/m² Médio: 304.2 cd/m² Minimum: 27 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 312 cd/m²
Contraste: 1357:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.19 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.72 | - Ø
91% sRGB (Argyll) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.29
Nexoc G739
CMN1738, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080, 17.3
HP Omen 17-w100ng
LG Philips LGD046E, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GE72 7RE-046
N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
12%
17%
54%
17%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45 (20, 25)
33.2 (14.4, 18.8)
26%
35 (14, 21)
22%
27 (13, 14)
40%
38 (12, 26)
16%
Response Time Black / White *
28 (7, 21)
28.8 (7.6, 21.2)
-3%
25 (4, 21)
11%
9 (6, 3)
68%
23 (5, 18)
18%
PWM Frequency
450 (90)
Screen
-26%
-8%
-16%
-40%
Brightness
304
337
11%
331
9%
230
-24%
312
3%
Brightness Distribution
85
91
7%
84
-1%
86
1%
91
7%
Black Level *
0.23
0.58
-152%
0.32
-39%
0.24
-4%
0.5
-117%
Contrast
1357
602
-56%
1069
-21%
1054
-22%
652
-52%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.19
4.5
-7%
4.35
-4%
5.01
-20%
6.3
-50%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.72
3.3
11%
3.73
-0%
7.26
-95%
7.37
-98%
Gamma
2.29 105%
2.15 112%
2.23 108%
2.09 115%
2.37 101%
CCT
7104 91%
6103 107%
6801 96%
6329 103%
7116 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
55.7
-6%
57
-3%
76
29%
55
-7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
75.7
-17%
86
-5%
100
10%
83
-9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-7% / -19%
5% / -3%
19% / -2%
-12% / -29%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 450 Hz90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 450 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 450 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8499 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.82 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.15 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
69.37 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
161 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
743 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
105.81 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼100%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
145 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
134 Points ∼83% -17%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
132 Points ∼82% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
743 Points ∼100%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
741 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼91% -9%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
464 Points ∼62% -38%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼100%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.72 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.65 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.5 Points ∼82% -18%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
1.49 Points ∼82% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Nexoc G739
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points ∼100%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.1 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points ∼92% -8%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
5.32 Points ∼65% -35%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
5252 Points ∼100% 0%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5243 Points ∼100%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4809 Points ∼92% -8%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
4711 Points ∼100% +10%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4670 Points ∼99% +9%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4270 Points ∼91%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
4088 Points ∼87% -4%
PCMark 7 - Score
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
6331 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
5990 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
5810 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
4114 Points ∼65% -35%
PCMark 7 Score
6331 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4270 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5420 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5243 pontos
Ajuda
Nexoc G739
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
HP Omen 17-w100ng
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G
MSI GE72 7RE-046
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-60%
-70%
-51%
-96%
Write 4k QD32
544.4
234.9
-57%
170.8
-69%
212.9
-61%
1.186
-100%
Read 4k QD32
635.7
247.6
-61%
141.6
-78%
372.5
-41%
1.106
-100%
Write 4k
154.5
76.8
-50%
76.14
-51%
112.9
-27%
1.146
-99%
Read 4k
60.74
24.7
-59%
20.25
-67%
22.7
-63%
0.602
-99%
Write 512
826.7
346.6
-58%
172.4
-79%
481.4
-42%
63.33
-92%
Read 512
856.5
336.1
-61%
315.5
-63%
455.1
-47%
44.85
-95%
Write Seq
1192
419.1
-65%
180.2
-85%
495.7
-58%
130.6
-89%
Read Seq
1666
475.7
-71%
495
-70%
539.6
-68%
134.6
-92%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Sequential Read: 1666 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1192 MB/s
512K Read: 856.5 MB/s
512K Write: 826.7 MB/s
4K Read: 60.74 MB/s
4K Write: 154.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 635.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 544.4 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14642 Points ∼100% +46%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14317 Points ∼98% +43%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
10186 Points ∼70% +2%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
10008 Points ∼68%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
7360 Points ∼50% -26%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11326 Points ∼100% +41%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11311 Points ∼100% +41%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
8086 Points ∼71% +1%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
8027 Points ∼71%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
5784 Points ∼51% -28%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
5421 Points ∼48% -32%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
79107 Points ∼100% +52%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
74982 Points ∼95% +44%
Nexoc G739
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
51987 Points ∼66%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
49223 Points ∼62% -5%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
35884 Points ∼45% -31%
3DMark 11 Performance
9687 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22876 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6950 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
2519 pontos
Ajuda
Battlefield 1
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
79 fps ∼100% +56%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
78.5 fps ∼99% +55%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
50.8 fps ∼64% 0%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
50.8 fps ∼64%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
41.1 fps ∼52% -19%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
87.4 fps ∼100% +57%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
86.6 fps ∼99% +55%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
56.7 fps ∼65% +2%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
55.7 fps ∼64%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
46.5 fps ∼53% -17%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
27.6 fps ∼100%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
26.9 fps ∼97% -3%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
19.7 fps ∼71% -29%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
50.4 fps ∼100%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
48.7 fps ∼97% -3%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
29.1 fps ∼58% -42%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
40.7 fps ∼100%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
39.7 fps ∼98% -2%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
31.2 fps ∼77% -23%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
47.6 fps ∼100%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
47.4 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
37.1 fps ∼78% -22%
For Honor
1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
46.1 fps ∼100%
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
45.8 (min: 33) fps ∼99% -1%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
62.9 (min: 51) fps ∼100% +1%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
62.1 fps ∼99%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
99.1 fps ∼100% +37%
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
98.9 fps ∼100% +36%
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
72.5 fps ∼73%
baixo média alto ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 72.5fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 89.850.427.6fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 84.247.640.7fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 79.255.750.8fps
For Honor (2017) 65.862.146.1fps

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 32 / 38 dB
HDD
31 dB
Carga
44 / 50 dB
 
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Noise
-0%
-6%
-1%
5%
off / environment *
30
28.8
4%
31
-3%
30
-0%
30.5
-2%
Idle Minimum *
31
33.9
-9%
35
-13%
34
-10%
31.4
-1%
Idle Average *
32
33.9
-6%
36
-13%
35
-9%
31.4
2%
Idle Maximum *
38
37.8
1%
37
3%
36
5%
31.5
17%
Load Average *
44
42.7
3%
44
-0%
41
7%
40.9
7%
Load Maximum *
50
47.4
5%
54
-8%
49
2%
46.2
8%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 48.5 °C50.6 °C43.3 °C 
 48.7 °C50.1 °C44 °C 
 42.5 °C42.8 °C31.3 °C 
Máximo: 50.6 °C
Médio: 44.6 °C
46.5 °C50 °C50.8 °C
45.8 °C48.9 °C40.9 °C
37 °C39.2 °C39.4 °C
Máximo: 50.8 °C
Médio: 44.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  51 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Heat
19%
2%
0%
-8%
Maximum Upper Side *
50.6
37.7
25%
41.5
18%
45.8
9%
53.1
-5%
Maximum Bottom *
50.8
36.3
29%
45.5
10%
45.2
11%
44.9
12%
Idle Upper Side *
28.7
25.7
10%
31.8
-11%
31.7
-10%
32.9
-15%
Idle Bottom *
27.1
24.4
10%
29.6
-9%
29.9
-10%
33.4
-23%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.839.42531.632.43133.328.2403433.95034.132.16329.628.98032.831.710029.729.912527.6251602625.320024.227.425024.235.531521.647.740021.749.150021.450.963019.251.880018.157.8100018.266.8125018.16816001866.9200017.764.7250017.861.2315017.566.3400017.865.1500017.663.3630017.855800017.758.51000017.849.91250017.953.51600017.755.4SPL30.776N1.532.9median 18.1Nexoc G739median 55Delta2.211.336.839.132.432.930.731.229.530.328.630.628.13126.932.425.132.624.231.323.347.122.557.521.661.720.859.819.95919.660.218.971.718.268.817.964.117.764.617.162.917.165.81767.51768.11768.517.371.41775.617.373.817.667.917.560.317.561.229.981.51.352.1median 17.7Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045Tmedian 64.11.85.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Nexoc G739 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.6 / 1 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 7 / 14 / 23 Watt
Carga midlight 82 / 163 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Power Consumption
16%
-40%
-27%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
7
6.2
11%
17
-143%
14
-100%
15.6
-123%
Idle Average *
14
12.2
13%
22
-57%
20
-43%
20.2
-44%
Idle Maximum *
23
14.8
36%
29
-26%
25
-9%
21.4
7%
Load Average *
82
84.9
-4%
72
12%
82
-0%
90
-10%
Load Maximum *
163
120.7
26%
141
13%
135
17%
147
10%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
10h 13min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3 (Edge 38.14393.0.0)
4h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 22min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 08min
Nexoc G739
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, 62 Wh
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, 48 Wh
HP Omen 17-w100ng
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6300HQ, 95.8 Wh
MSI GE72 7RE-046
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, 51.4 Wh
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, 76 Wh
Battery Runtime
-30%
6%
-38%
-27%
Reader / Idle
613
515
-16%
543
-11%
353
-42%
H.264
322
313
-3%
195
-39%
262
-19%
WiFi v1.3
288
261
-9%
363
26%
184
-36%
250
-13%
Load
128
45
-65%
145
13%
87
-32%

Graças ao poderoso hardware, o Nexoc G739 é um portátil de nível de entrada com muita capacidade. A placa de vídeo harmoniza bem com a tela Full-HD, que é suficientemente brilhante e, de doutra forma, também alcança bons resultados. Mas em muitas outras áreas, como, por exemplo, as conexões, a carcaça, e os dispositivos de entrada, o aparelho de teste é apenas médio.

Em termos de desempenho, o Nexoc G739 não apenas mostra que não possui fraquezas e consegue lidar com jogos exigentes, mas as emissões do Clevo-N870HK1 Barebones poderiam melhorar.

Os pontos fracos claramente incluem a temperatura e a geração de ruído. A carcaça ofereceria suficiente espaço para um sistema de resfriamento mais potente, mas ambas as ventoinhas pequenas fazem muito ruído e a carcaça também esquenta muito. Também há necessidade de melhorias nos conectores (sem Thunderbolt), e procuramos por recursos de jogos particulares como G-Sync em vão aqui.

No geral, o Nexoc G739, com certeza não é um mal portátil para jogos, mas dar uma olhada na concorrência não pode machucar.

Pro

+ Todos os componentes são acessíveis.
+ Tela IPS FHD de alto contraste
+ Teclado iluminado
+ Bom desempenho
+ Unidade base estável

Contra

- Altas temperaturas da carcaça sob uso intenso
- Ventoinha barulhenta durante a operação 3D
- Sem fonte de alimentação incluída
- Alto falantes fracos
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
Nexoc G739. Test device provided by Nexoc Germany.
Nexoc G739. Test device provided by Nexoc Germany.

Thanks to the powerful hardware, the Nexoc G739 is a capable entry-level notebook. The graphics card harmonizes well with the Full-HD display, which is sufficiently bright and otherwise achieves decent results as well. But in many other areas, such as for example the connections, casing, and input devices, the test device is only average.

In terms of the performance, the Nexoc G739 does not show any weaknesses and handles also demanding games, but the emissions of the Clevo-N870HK1 Barebones could be improved.

The weak points clearly include the temperature and noise generation. The casing would offer sufficient space for a stronger cooling system, but both small fans make a lot of noise and the casing gets very warm as well. There is also need for improvements in the connectors (no Thunderbolt), and we looked for particular gaming features such as G-Sync here in vain as well.

Overall, the Nexoc G739 sure is not a bad gaming notebook, but a look at the competition cannot hurt.

Nexoc G739 - 04/01/2017 v6
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento
76 / 98 → 78%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
75%
Conectividade
60 / 81 → 74%
Peso
57 / 66 → 85%
Bateria
81%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
89%
Desempenho da aplicação
96%
Temperatura
82 / 95 → 86%
Ruído
72 / 90 → 80%
Audio
64%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Médio
75%
82%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Nexoc G739 (Clevo N870HK1)
Andreas Osthoff, 2017-04-11 (Update: 2017-04-16)