Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019: Retorno do Exótico

Gamer econômico. Em 2019, o Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop não apenas nos surpreendeu com uma carcaça robusta de alta qualidade, mas também com uma boa relação preço-desempenho. Descubra se a iteração de 2019 segue o exemplo.
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 (Mi Gaming Laptop Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1110 MHz, Memoría: 7000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 441.12, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual channel, todos os slots ocupados
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, NV156FHM-N4G (BOE0867), IPS, FHD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, 512 GB 
, NVMe-SSD, Slots: 2x M.2 Typ 2280 & 1x 2.5-Zoll
Placa de Som
Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: 1 saída para fones, 1 entrada para microfone, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 21 x 364 x 265
Bateria
55 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador de 180 W, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.6 kg, Suprimento de energia: 500 g
Preço
1400 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82.3 %
11/2019
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.6 kg21 mm15.60"1920x1080
80.8 %
10/2019
MSI GL65 9SEK
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.3 kg27.5 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.7 %
08/2019
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.3 kg26 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.4 %
08/2019
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.4 kg25.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
87.3 %
11/2019
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.2 kg17.9 mm15.60"3840x2160

Size Comparison

365 mm 260 mm 26 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 274 mm 25.9 mm 2.4 kg357.7 mm 248 mm 27.5 mm 2.3 kg364 mm 265 mm 21 mm 2.6 kg359 mm 255 mm 17.9 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1160 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (865 - 1412, n=12, last 2 years)
1078 MBit/s -7%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1380 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (708 - 1700, n=12, last 2 years)
1310 MBit/s -5%
305
cd/m²
292
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE0867) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 316 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 295.1 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 279 cd/m²
Contraste: 1374:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.64
ΔE Greyscale 3.66 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.62
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE0867), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
MSI GL65 9SEK
AU Optronics B156HAN13.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
BOE NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Panda LM156LF-GL02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
AU Optronics AUO31EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Display
-42%
-1%
-37%
30%
Display P3 Coverage
65.2
36.63
-44%
64.5
-1%
40.13
-38%
85.7
31%
sRGB Coverage
92.1
55
-40%
91.6
-1%
60.3
-35%
100
9%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.4
37.85
-43%
65.9
-1%
41.48
-38%
99
49%
Response Times
-175%
9%
-154%
-304%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
26.4 ?(13.2, 13.2)
-200%
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
-0%
26 ?(13.6, 12.4)
-195%
49 ?(24, 25)
-457%
Response Time Black / White *
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
30 ?(17.6, 12.4)
-150%
10 ?(5.6, 4.4)
17%
25.6 ?(14.8, 10.8)
-113%
30 ?(17, 13)
-150%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-49%
-8%
-65%
28%
Brightness middle
316
277.3
-12%
284
-10%
290.1
-8%
365
16%
Brightness
295
256
-13%
277
-6%
274
-7%
357
21%
Brightness Distribution
87
86
-1%
87
0%
86
-1%
84
-3%
Black Level *
0.23
0.2
13%
0.3
-30%
0.54
-135%
0.275
-20%
Contrast
1374
1387
1%
947
-31%
537
-61%
1327
-3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.84
5.25
-37%
3.53
8%
5.16
-34%
0.99
74%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.69
19.43
-241%
6.11
-7%
18.09
-218%
1.89
67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.64
4.39
-168%
1.81
-10%
4.35
-165%
1.01
38%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.66
3.5
4%
3.56
3%
4.4
-20%
1.29
65%
Gamma
2.62 84%
2.1 105%
2.47 89%
2.1 105%
2.2 100%
CCT
7165 91%
6895 94%
7257 90%
7362 88%
6548 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
35
-42%
59
-2%
38.1
-36%
88
47%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
55
-40%
91
-1%
60
-35%
100
9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-89% / -63%
0% / -5%
-85% / -71%
-82% / -13%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18099 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
0651301952603253904555205856507157808459109751040110511701235Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1096 (1015.87-1242.3)
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1185 (1166.86-1278.16)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1208 (1186.17-1271.21)
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1103 (1087.93-1223.2)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=245, last 2 years)
265 Points +39%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H
190 Points 0%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H
188 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Intel Core i7-9750H
190 Points
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
188 Points -1%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H
188 Points -1%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Core i7-9750H
179 Points -6%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=247, last 2 years)
2988 Points +141%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H
1281 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
1271 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Intel Core i7-9750H
1242 Points
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Core i7-9750H
1226 Points -1%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H
1046 Points -16%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H
952 (291.42min - 964.09max) Points -23%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=241, last 2 years)
689 Points +50%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H
465 Points +1%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H
465 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Intel Core i7-9750H
460 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=241, last 2 years)
7164 Points +177%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H
2785 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Intel Core i7-9750H
2588 Points
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H
2227 Points -14%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1242 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (4477 - 9852, n=206, last 2 years)
7542 Points +33%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5997 Points +6%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5761 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5681 Points
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5528 Points -3%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5449 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
MSI GL65 9SEK
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-3%
10%
-16%
14%
Write 4K
110.3
150.2
36%
131.7
19%
121.9
11%
109
-1%
Read 4K
47.17
43.46
-8%
48.06
2%
53.6
14%
41.33
-12%
Write Seq
1381
1412
2%
1234
-11%
967
-30%
2535
84%
Read Seq
1327
1340
1%
973
-27%
1461
10%
1538
16%
Write 4K Q32T1
404.7
482.2
19%
576
42%
431.4
7%
396.6
-2%
Read 4K Q32T1
437.2
535
22%
655
50%
337.3
-23%
603
38%
Write Seq Q32T1
2960
1454
-51%
3012
2%
972
-67%
2542
-14%
Read Seq Q32T1
3278
1744
-47%
3481
6%
1727
-47%
3324
1%
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3278 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2960 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 437.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 404.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1327 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1381 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.17 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 110.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
18262 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
35196 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15004 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
6209 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=248, last 2 years)
29013 Points +75%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
16571 Points
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
16331 Points -1%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
15913 Points -4%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
15552 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
14970 Points -10%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=246, last 2 years)
11809 Points +93%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6159 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6109 Points
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6059 Points -1%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (280 - 14457, n=163, last 2 years)
7581 Points +119%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
3464 Points
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
3261 Points -6%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
3203 Points -8%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=244, last 2 years)
39642 Points +86%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
21303 Points
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
21075 Points -1%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
20723 Points -3%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
19882 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
19537 Points -8%
05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G: Ø62.8 (58-66)
MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G: Ø58.8 (54-63)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø56.5 (52-63)
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø55.8 (52-60)
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=175, last 2 years)
214 fps +89%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
117.5 fps +4%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
117.4 fps +4%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
113 (95min) fps
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
107 fps -5%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=243, last 2 years)
114.3 fps +89%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
63.3 fps +4%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
60.6 (50min) fps
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
58.7 fps -3%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
57 fps -6%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H
56.7 fps -6%
baixo média alto ultraQHD4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 113 60.6
Fortnite (2018) 130 107
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 87.4 62.3
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 68 50
Battlefield V (2018) 106 103
Darksiders III (2018) 106 93.4
Just Cause 4 (2018) 89.2 82.1
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 127 74
Anno 1800 (2019) 67.1 37.3
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 99.6 93.2 87.7 74.9 54.4 29.6
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 99.6 93.8 87.6 61.9 30.1
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.931.933.833.234.22537.334.44236.242.23130.828.932.528.7324030.9323429.138.45030.230.831.726.739.46330.630.527.826.432.68029.331.128.426.342.710027.628.625.923.53712534.238.325.324.932.816032.331.629.728.84120028.829.324.421.934.425031.427.823.321.437.131532.629.222.821.139.740033.828.422.11941.750034.43021.419.344.263034.129.121.618.244.780034.631.121.719.145.3100034.731.319.61845.3125035.831.820.318.846.516003530.819.618.446.3200034.431.118.317.646.6250037.229.318.418.148.3315036.628.218.217.949.9400031.224.417.817.850500031.923.517.817.948.4630029.321.717.717.446.8800024.418.917.717.644.41000021.518.117.817.541.7125002118.217.617.440.21600022.11817.617.334.6SPL46.140.931.630.459.1N5.43.71.71.413.4median 32.6median 29.1median 19.6median 18.2median 44.4Delta3.44.12.21.44.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseXiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 32 / 42 dB
Carga
52 / 59 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
MSI GL65 9SEK
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
7%
10%
11%
14%
18%
off / environment *
30
28.1
6%
30
-0%
28.2
6%
30.4
-1%
24.1 ?(19.5 - 29.9, n=192, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Minimum *
31
31.4
-1%
30
3%
28.8
7%
30.6
1%
25.6 ?(21.9 - 41.6, n=193, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Average *
32
31.5
2%
32
-0%
31.4
2%
30.6
4%
27.4 ?(21.9 - 42.1, n=193, last 2 years)
14%
Idle Maximum *
42
33.5
20%
34
19%
33.3
21%
30.6
27%
30.8 ?(21.9 - 47, n=193, last 2 years)
27%
Load Average *
52
49.3
5%
44
15%
46.2
11%
44
15%
43.2 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=193, last 2 years)
17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
59
51.3
13%
48
19%
50.5
14%
43.9
26%
Load Maximum *
59
58
2%
52
12%
51.3
13%
44.2
25%
53.3 ?(42.1 - 68.2, n=193, last 2 years)
10%

* ... smaller is better

 48 °C51 °C48 °C 
 43 °C47 °C42 °C 
 25 °C26 °C26 °C 
Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 39.6 °C
53 °C56 °C48 °C
55 °C57 °C39 °C
28 °C26 °C29 °C
Máximo: 57 °C
Médio: 43.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  46 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
MSI GL65 9SEK
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-25%
-25%
-5%
1%
-7%
Maximum Upper Side *
51
49
4%
47
8%
43.4
15%
44.6
13%
46.2 ?(28.2 - 61, n=193, last 2 years)
9%
Maximum Bottom *
57
54.2
5%
60
-5%
49.2
14%
57.2
-0%
49.6 ?(30 - 66.3, n=193, last 2 years)
13%
Idle Upper Side *
27
40.4
-50%
37
-37%
30.8
-14%
27.4
-1%
31.6 ?(21.2 - 43, n=193, last 2 years)
-17%
Idle Bottom *
25
40
-60%
41
-64%
34
-36%
27.6
-10%
32.7 ?(22.6 - 45, n=193, last 2 years)
-31%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.231.92536.238.53128.733.24029.135.85026.732.76326.436.38026.339.510023.546.312524.952.616028.85820021.959.225021.463.731521.165.44001970.950019.371.663018.278.680019.178.610001874.4125018.880160018.476.5200017.680.8250018.179.3315017.978.6400017.875.5500017.976.2630017.474.4800017.670.11000017.563.41250017.4611600017.356.3SPL30.489.3N1.481median 18.2median 74.4Delta1.48.635.235.641.639.430.729.53535.930.230.627.930.728.441.825.242.724.234.326.149.321.857.520.767.820.667.219.269.518.770.917.974.61773.717.370.218.272.117.771.217.170.617.371.217.570.117.467.717.46317.467.717.566.417.258.517.260.917.560.43082.21.356.7median 17.5median 67.71.75.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.6 / 1.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 10 / 13 / 20 Watt
Carga midlight 100 / 196 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
MSI GL65 9SEK
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-115%
-25%
-17%
7%
-31%
Idle Minimum *
10
41
-310%
15
-50%
10.9
-9%
7.6
24%
13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=189, last 2 years)
-38%
Idle Average *
13
45.3
-248%
20
-54%
14.7
-13%
13.6
-5%
19 ?(6.5 - 67, n=189, last 2 years)
-46%
Idle Maximum *
20
47.1
-136%
33
-65%
32.4
-62%
18.2
9%
26.6 ?(9 - 101.1, n=189, last 2 years)
-33%
Load Average *
100
94.9
5%
88
12%
121.9
-22%
102
-2%
112 ?(32.1 - 202, n=189, last 2 years)
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
159
149.4
6%
128
19%
143.5
10%
144
9%
Load Maximum *
196
214.2
-9%
213
-9%
209.6
-7%
183
7%
250 ?(64.5 - 418, n=188, last 2 years)
-28%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
6h 10min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 48min
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 55 Wh
MSI GL65 9SEK
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 51 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 57 Wh
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 66 Wh
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 84 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-6%
-8%
-58%
106%
55%
Reader / Idle
370
262
-29%
233
-37%
822
122%
548 ?(57 - 1290, n=90, last 2 years)
48%
WiFi v1.3
264
230
-13%
192
-27%
112
-58%
518
96%
364 ?(57 - 745, n=191, last 2 years)
38%
Load
48
60
25%
67
40%
96
100%
85.5 ?(36 - 173, n=153, last 2 years)
78%
H.264
388
392 ?(56 - 747, n=97, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Tela de 144 Hz de alto contraste altamente responsiva
+ Ótima relação preço-desempenho
+ Carcaça robusta e de alta qualidade
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Design simples

Contra

- Compra muito complicada por conta da disponibilidade, idioma, etc.
- Apenas uma saída de vídeo externa
- Extremamente barulhento sob carga 3D
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019

Os prós e contras da edição 2019 da Xiaomi do Mi Gaming Laptop são praticamente idênticos aos do seu predecessor

No lado positivo, temos uma carcaça robusta e de alta qualidade, com seu design simples que se encaixa em praticamente todos os lugares. Também gostamos de seus dispositivos de entrada, pois eles eram adequados para o escritório e jogos. A falta do Thunderbolt 3 é compensada por uma tela rápida de 144 Hz e um leitor de cartões mais rápido.

Suas maiores desvantagens são as emissões de ruído, principalmente em 3D. Simplificando, o portátil de 15 polegadas é significativamente barulhento demais, algo que nem mesmo a excelente relação preço-desempenho pode compensar.

Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 - 05/14/2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
85 / 98 → 87%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
56 / 80 → 70%
Peso
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Bateria
60 / 95 → 63%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
92%
Desempenho da aplicação
92%
Temperatura
82 / 95 → 86%
Ruído
55 / 90 → 61%
Audio
79%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Médio
73%
82%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019: Retorno do Exótico
Florian Glaser, 2019-11-21 (Update: 2019-11-23)