snhb.queue.push(function(){ snhb.addAdditionalAdSlotsToRefresh(additionalAdSlots); }); googletag.enableServices(); }); nbc_pagecall();
Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019: Retorno do Exótico

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn, 11/21/2019

Gamer econômico. Em 2019, o Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop não apenas nos surpreendeu com uma carcaça robusta de alta qualidade, mas também com uma boa relação preço-desempenho. Descubra se a iteração de 2019 segue o exemplo.

Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 (Mi Gaming Laptop Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-9750H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Análises do: 1110 MHz, Memoría: 7000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 441.12, Optimus
Memória
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual channel, todos os slots ocupados
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, NV156FHM-N4G (BOE0867), IPS, FHD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, 512 GB 
, NVMe-SSD, Slots: 2x M.2 Typ 2280 & 1x 2.5-Zoll
Placa de Som
Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: 1 saída para fones, 1 entrada para microfone, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 21 x 364 x 265
Bateria
55 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Carregador de 180 W, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.6 kg, Suprimento de energia: 500 g
Preço
1400 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionBest Price
83%11/2019Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
2.6 kg21 mm15.6"1920x1080
81%10/2019MSI GL65 9SEK
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
2.3 kg27.5 mm15.6"1920x1080
86%08/2019Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
2.3 kg26 mm15.6"1920x1080
86%08/2019Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
2.4 kg25.9 mm15.6"1920x1080
86%11/2019Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
2.2 kg17.9 mm15.6"3840x2160

Size Comparison

365 mm 260 mm 26 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 274 mm 25.9 mm 2.4 kg357.7 mm 248 mm 27.5 mm 2.3 kg364 mm 265 mm 21 mm 2.6 kg359 mm 255 mm 17.9 mm 2.2 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 206, n=262)
91.7 MB/s ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼85%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=260)
109 MB/s ∼100% +28%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s ∼78%
305
cd/m²
292
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE0867)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 316 cd/m² Médio: 295.1 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 279 cd/m²
Contraste: 1374:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.84 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.64
ΔE Greyscale 3.66 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.62
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE0867), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GL65 9SEK
AU Optronics B156HAN13.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
BOE NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Panda LM156LF-GL02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
AU Optronics AUO31EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Response Times
-175%
9%
-154%
-304%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
26.4 (13.2, 13.2)
-200%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
-0%
26 (13.6, 12.4)
-195%
49 (24, 25)
-457%
Response Time Black / White *
12 (6.8, 5.2)
30 (17.6, 12.4)
-150%
10 (5.6, 4.4)
17%
25.6 (14.8, 10.8)
-113%
30 (17, 13)
-150%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-49%
-8%
-65%
-14%
Brightness middle
316
277.3
-12%
284
-10%
290.1
-8%
365
16%
Brightness
295
256
-13%
277
-6%
274
-7%
357
21%
Brightness Distribution
87
86
-1%
87
0%
86
-1%
84
-3%
Black Level *
0.23
0.2
13%
0.3
-30%
0.54
-135%
0.275
-20%
Contrast
1374
1387
1%
947
-31%
537
-61%
1327
-3%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.84
5.25
-37%
3.53
8%
5.16
-34%
4.4
-15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.69
19.43
-241%
6.11
-7%
18.09
-218%
10.2
-79%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.64
4.39
-168%
1.81
-10%
4.35
-165%
4.3
-162%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.66
3.5
4%
3.56
3%
4.4
-20%
2.3
37%
Gamma
2.62 84%
2.1 105%
2.47 89%
2.1 105%
2.08 106%
CCT
7165 91%
6895 94%
7257 90%
7362 88%
6336 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
35
-42%
59
-2%
38.1
-36%
88
47%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
55
-40%
91
-1%
60
-35%
100
9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-112% / -68%
1% / -5%
-110% / -79%
-159% / -58%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.4 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9347 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1096 (1015.87-1242.3)
MSI GL65 9SEK Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1185 (1166.86-1278.16)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1208 (1186.17-1271.21)
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1103 (1087.93-1223.2)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Intel Core i7-9750H
190 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
188 Points ∼99% -1%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H
188 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H
188 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Core i7-9750H
179 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=535)
157 Points ∼83% -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H
1281 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H
1271 Points ∼99% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Intel Core i7-9750H
1242 Points ∼97%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel Core i7-9750H
1226 Points ∼96% -1%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
Intel Core i7-9750H
1046 Points ∼82% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=538)
841 Points ∼66% -32%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H
465 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Intel Core i7-9750H
460 Points ∼99%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 509, n=59)
431 Points ∼93% -6%
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H
2785 Points ∼100% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Intel Core i7-9750H
2588 Points ∼93%
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 4926, n=59)
2558 Points ∼92% -1%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1242 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5997 Points ∼100% +6%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5761 Points ∼96% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5681 Points ∼95%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5528 Points ∼92% -3%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5449 Points ∼91% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=231)
5250 Points ∼88% -8%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
MSI GL65 9SEK
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-3%
10%
-16%
14%
Write 4K
110.3
150.2
36%
131.7
19%
121.9
11%
108.98
-1%
Read 4K
47.17
43.46
-8%
48.06
2%
53.62
14%
41.33
-12%
Write Seq
1381
1412
2%
1234
-11%
966.9
-30%
2534.91
84%
Read Seq
1327
1340
1%
972.5
-27%
1461
10%
1537.92
16%
Write 4K Q32T1
404.7
482.2
19%
576.3
42%
431.4
7%
396.65
-2%
Read 4K Q32T1
437.2
534.6
22%
655.1
50%
337.3
-23%
603.14
38%
Write Seq Q32T1
2960
1454
-51%
3012
2%
971.5
-67%
2542.4
-14%
Read Seq Q32T1
3278
1744
-47%
3481
6%
1727
-47%
3324.1
1%
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3278 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2960 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 437.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 404.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1327 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1381 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.17 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 110.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
18262 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
35196 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15004 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
6209 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (1097 - 5942, n=67)
3968 Points ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
3464 Points ∼87%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
3261 Points ∼82% -6%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
3203 Points ∼81% -8%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
6159 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
6109 Points ∼99%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
6059 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=174)
5754 Points ∼93% -6%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
Points ∼0% -100%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
16571 Points ∼100%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
16331 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
15913 Points ∼96% -4%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
15552 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
14970 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=562)
11534 Points ∼70% -30%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
21303 Points ∼100%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
21075 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
20723 Points ∼97% -3%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
19882 Points ∼93% -7%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
19537 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=637)
13671 Points ∼64% -36%
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G: Ø62.8 (58-66)
MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G: Ø58.8 (54-63)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø56.5 (52-63)
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø55.8 (52-60)
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
63.3 fps ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
60.6 (min: 50) fps ∼96%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
58.7 fps ∼93% -3%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
57 fps ∼90% -6%
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
56.7 fps ∼90% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=331)
50.5 fps ∼80% -17%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
117.5 fps ∼100% +4%
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
117.4 fps ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
113 (min: 95) fps ∼96%
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
107 fps ∼91% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 194, n=284)
88.6 fps ∼75% -22%
baixo média alto ultraQHD4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 113 60.6 fps
Fortnite (2018) 130 107 fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 87.4 62.3 fps
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 68 50 fps
Battlefield V (2018) 106 103 fps
Darksiders III (2018) 106 93.4 fps
Just Cause 4 (2018) 89.2 82.1 fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 127 74 fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 67.1 37.3 fps
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 99.6 93.2 87.7 74.9 54.4 29.6 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 99.6 93.8 87.6 61.9 30.1 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.931.933.833.234.22537.334.44236.242.23130.828.932.528.7324030.9323429.138.45030.230.831.726.739.46330.630.527.826.432.68029.331.128.426.342.710027.628.625.923.53712534.238.325.324.932.816032.331.629.728.84120028.829.324.421.934.425031.427.823.321.437.131532.629.222.821.139.740033.828.422.11941.750034.43021.419.344.263034.129.121.618.244.780034.631.121.719.145.3100034.731.319.61845.3125035.831.820.318.846.516003530.819.618.446.3200034.431.118.317.646.6250037.229.318.418.148.3315036.628.218.217.949.9400031.224.417.817.850500031.923.517.817.948.4630029.321.717.717.446.8800024.418.917.717.644.41000021.518.117.817.541.7125002118.217.617.440.21600022.11817.617.334.6SPL46.140.931.630.459.1N5.43.71.71.413.4median 32.6median 29.1median 19.6median 18.2median 44.4Delta3.43.82.82.13.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseXiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019

Barulho

Ocioso
31 / 32 / 42 dB
Carga
52 / 59 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
MSI GL65 9SEK
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
7%
10%
11%
14%
10%
off / environment *
30
28.1
6%
30
-0%
28.2
6%
30.4
-1%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=333)
2%
Idle Minimum *
31
31.4
-1%
30
3%
28.8
7%
30.6
1%
31.4 (28 - 42, n=756)
-1%
Idle Average *
32
31.5
2%
32
-0%
31.4
2%
30.6
4%
32.6 (28 - 46.6, n=756)
-2%
Idle Maximum *
42
33.5
20%
34
19%
33.3
21%
30.6
27%
34.6 (28 - 52, n=756)
18%
Load Average *
52
49.3
5%
44
15%
46.2
11%
44
15%
40.8 (30.1 - 58, n=757)
22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
59
51.3
13%
48
19%
50.5
14%
43.9
26%
Load Maximum *
59
58
2%
52
12%
51.3
13%
44.2
25%
48.2 (38.9 - 64.1, n=757)
18%

* ... smaller is better

 48 °C51 °C48 °C 
 43 °C47 °C42 °C 
 25 °C26 °C26 °C 
Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 39.6 °C
53 °C56 °C48 °C
55 °C57 °C39 °C
28 °C26 °C29 °C
Máximo: 57 °C
Médio: 43.4 °C
alimentação elétrica  46 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
MSI GL65 9SEK
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-25%
-25%
-5%
1%
-5%
Maximum Upper Side *
51
49
4%
47
8%
43.4
15%
44.6
13%
45.9 (28 - 68.8, n=722)
10%
Maximum Bottom *
57
54.2
5%
60
-5%
49.2
14%
57.2
-0%
49.6 (25.9 - 78, n=720)
13%
Idle Upper Side *
27
40.4
-50%
37
-37%
30.8
-14%
27.4
-1%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=674)
-14%
Idle Bottom *
25
40
-60%
41
-64%
34
-36%
27.6
-10%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=672)
-27%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.231.92536.238.53128.733.24029.135.85026.732.76326.436.38026.339.510023.546.312524.952.616028.85820021.959.225021.463.731521.165.44001970.950019.371.663018.278.680019.178.610001874.4125018.880160018.476.5200017.680.8250018.179.3315017.978.6400017.875.5500017.976.2630017.474.4800017.670.11000017.563.41250017.4611600017.356.3SPL30.489.3N1.481median 18.2median 71.6Delta2.1835.235.641.639.430.729.53535.930.230.627.930.728.441.825.242.724.234.326.149.321.857.520.767.820.667.219.269.518.770.917.974.61773.717.370.218.272.117.771.217.170.617.371.217.570.117.467.717.46317.467.717.566.417.258.517.260.917.560.43082.21.356.7median 17.5median 67.71.66.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.6 / 1.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 10 / 13 / 20 Watt
Carga midlight 100 / 196 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
MSI GL65 9SEK
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-115%
-25%
-17%
7%
-46%
Idle Minimum *
10
41
-310%
15
-50%
10.9
-9%
7.6
24%
19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=718)
-94%
Idle Average *
13
45.3
-248%
20
-54%
14.7
-13%
13.6
-5%
24.8 (6.6 - 119, n=718)
-91%
Idle Maximum *
20
47.1
-136%
33
-65%
32.4
-62%
18.2
9%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=718)
-51%
Load Average *
100
94.9
5%
88
12%
121.9
-22%
102
-2%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=709)
-4%
Load Maximum *
196
214.2
-9%
213
-9%
209.6
-7%
183
7%
172 (21.9 - 590, n=708)
12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
159
149.4
6%
128
19%
143.5
10%
144
9%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
6h 10min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 48min
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 55 Wh
MSI GL65 9SEK
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 51 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 57 Wh
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 66 Wh
Acer ConceptD 7 CN715-71-743N
9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 84 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-6%
-8%
-58%
106%
19%
Reader / Idle
370
262
-29%
233
-37%
822
122%
349 (39 - 1174, n=677)
-6%
WiFi v1.3
264
230
-13%
192
-27%
112
-58%
518
96%
259 (78 - 622, n=382)
-2%
Load
48
60
25%
67
40%
96
100%
78.9 (18 - 202, n=643)
64%
H.264
388
257 (88 - 508, n=148)

Pro

+ Tela de 144 Hz de alto contraste altamente responsiva
+ Ótima relação preço-desempenho
+ Carcaça robusta e de alta qualidade
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Design simples

Contra

- Compra muito complicada por conta da disponibilidade, idioma, etc.
- Apenas uma saída de vídeo externa
- Extremamente barulhento sob carga 3D
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019

Os prós e contras da edição 2019 da Xiaomi do Mi Gaming Laptop são praticamente idênticos aos do seu predecessor

No lado positivo, temos uma carcaça robusta e de alta qualidade, com seu design simples que se encaixa em praticamente todos os lugares. Também gostamos de seus dispositivos de entrada, pois eles eram adequados para o escritório e jogos. A falta do Thunderbolt 3 é compensada por uma tela rápida de 144 Hz e um leitor de cartões mais rápido.

Suas maiores desvantagens são as emissões de ruído, principalmente em 3D. Simplificando, o portátil de 15 polegadas é significativamente barulhento demais, algo que nem mesmo a excelente relação preço-desempenho pode compensar.

Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 - 11/18/2019 v7
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
85 / 98 → 87%
Teclado
83%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
56 / 80 → 70%
Peso
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Bateria
60 / 95 → 63%
Pantalha
85%
Desempenho do jogos
92%
Desempenho da aplicação
92%
Temperatura
82 / 95 → 86%
Ruído
55 / 90 → 61%
Audio
79%
Médio
76%
83%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019: Retorno do Exótico
Florian Glaser, 2019-11-21 (Update: 2019-11-23)