Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Portátil Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop (i5-7300HQ, GTX 1060, Full HD)

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 06/03/2018

Dica interna. A fabricante de eletrônicos chinesa, que era conhecida no passado principalmente por seus smartphones, agora oferece um poderoso portátil topo de linha para seu mercado doméstico. O Mi Gaming Laptop pontua com uma relação preço-desempenho especialmente boa. Por menos de 1500 Euros (~$1.732), você pode obter uma GeForce GTX 1060, uma CPU quad-core e um painel Full HD. Vale a pena importar?

Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 (Mi Gaming Laptop Serie)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Análises do: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 397.64, Optimus
Memória
8192 MB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4-2400, single channel, 1 de 2 slots ocupados, 32 GB máx.
Pantalha
15.6 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE0747), IPS, Full HD, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM175 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ, 128 GB 
, SATA-III SSD + Seagate BarraCuda ST1000LM048, 1 TB HDD, 5400 rpm. Slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280 & 1x 2.5 inch
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
5 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 1x fone, 1x microfone, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 23 x 364 x 265
Bateria
55 Wh, 3620 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0 Dolby Atmos, Teclado: Chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 180 W, Guia de início rápido, Várias ferramentas do fabricante
peso
2.742 kg, Suprimento de energia: 495 g
Preço
1300 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=203)
90.3 MB/s ∼100% +234%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77 MB/s ∼85% +185%
Medion Erazer X6603
  (oshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72 MB/s ∼80% +167%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27 MB/s ∼30%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.95 MB/s ∼30% 0%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=201)
109 MB/s ∼100% +289%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼80% +211%
Medion Erazer X6603
  (oshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.2 MB/s ∼72% +179%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
29.44 MB/s ∼27% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28 MB/s ∼26%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
701 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
659 MBit/s ∼94%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
654 MBit/s ∼93% -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Qualcomm QCA6174
603 MBit/s ∼86% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=174)
594 MBit/s ∼85% -10%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
517 MBit/s ∼74% -22%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
664 MBit/s ∼100% +83%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Qualcomm QCA6174
600 MBit/s ∼90% +65%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=174)
532 MBit/s ∼80% +47%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
522 MBit/s ∼79% +44%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
426 MBit/s ∼64% +17%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
363 MBit/s ∼55%
282
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
249
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
251
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 286 cd/m² Médio: 268.8 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 250 cd/m²
Contraste: 1230:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.68 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 2.5
ΔE Greyscale 4.32 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
87% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE0747), IPS, 1920x1080
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
ID: LG Philips LGD053F, Name: 156WF6, Dell P/N: 4XK13, IPS, 1920x1080
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
AUO42ED, IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK6, IPS, 1920x1080
Medion Erazer X6603
LP156WF6-SPK3, AH-IPS, LED, 1920x1080
Response Times
34%
22%
41%
-15%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
53.2 (26.4, 26.8)
35.6 (20, 15.6)
33%
43.2 (21.2, 22)
19%
35 (16, 19)
34%
46 (36, 10)
14%
Response Time Black / White *
41.6 (23.6, 18)
27.6 (15.6, 12)
34%
31.2 (16.4, 14.8)
25%
22 (12, 10)
47%
29 (17, 12)
30%
PWM Frequency
21550 (99)
2174 (90)
-90%
Screen
-31%
8%
-16%
-33%
Brightness middle
283
235.4
-17%
304
7%
276
-2%
252
-11%
Brightness
269
223
-17%
289
7%
265
-1%
246
-9%
Brightness Distribution
87
91
5%
86
-1%
91
5%
94
8%
Black Level *
0.23
0.28
-22%
0.26
-13%
0.25
-9%
0.23
-0%
Contrast
1230
841
-32%
1169
-5%
1104
-10%
1096
-11%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.68
5.6
-20%
3.46
26%
5.06
-8%
7.83
-67%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8
20.3
-154%
7.72
3%
10.13
-27%
15.5
-94%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.5
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.32
3.6
17%
2.46
43%
6.25
-45%
7.11
-65%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.23 99%
2.38 92%
1.76 125%
2.19 100%
CCT
7612 85%
7214 90%
6915 94%
6873 95%
7930 82%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
35.2
-38%
59
4%
40
-30%
35
-39%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
87
55.4
-36%
91
5%
62
-29%
55
-37%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
2% / -21%
15% / 10%
13% / -6%
-24% / -29%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.6 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
53.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.4 ms rise
↘ 26.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 21550 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 21550 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 21550 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8629 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
Latencies
 
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
162 Points ∼100% +17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
162 Points ∼100% +17%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points ∼99% +16%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼93% +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 209, n=413)
151 Points ∼93% +9%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
138 Points ∼85%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
131 Points ∼81% -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1865, n=414)
744 Points ∼100% +44%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
740 Points ∼99% +43%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
732 Points ∼98% +42%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
727 Points ∼98% +41%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
699 Points ∼94% +35%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
516 Points ∼69%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
514 Points ∼69% 0%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.83 Points ∼100% +17%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.72 Points ∼94% +10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.71 Points ∼93% +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=406)
1.679 Points ∼92% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.56 Points ∼85%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.52 Points ∼83% -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.18 Points ∼100% +38%
Medion Erazer X6603
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.13 Points ∼99% +37%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.26 Points ∼89% +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.2, n=507)
7.26 Points ∼89% +22%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.93 Points ∼72%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.92 Points ∼72% 0%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.56 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
5.93 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
138 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
516 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6959, n=115)
4933 Points ∼100% +18%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4861 Points ∼99% +16%
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4618 Points ∼94% +10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
4474 Points ∼91% +7%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4406 Points ∼89% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
4197 Points ∼85%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5348 Points ∼100% +9%
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5129 Points ∼96% +4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
5096 Points ∼95% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=310)
4919 Points ∼92% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
4912 Points ∼92%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4856 Points ∼91% -1%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4858 Points ∼100% +24%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=328)
4218 Points ∼87% +8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
4177 Points ∼86% +7%
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4119 Points ∼85% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
3910 Points ∼80%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3759 Points ∼77% -4%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3910 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4912 pontos
Ajuda
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7
Medion Erazer X6603
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
AS SSD
165%
29%
175%
Score Total
834
2405
188%
984
18%
2431
191%
Score Write
302
594
97%
344
14%
750
148%
Score Read
343
1241
262%
446
30%
1162
239%
4K Write
104.05
100.19
-4%
75.03
-28%
129.25
24%
4K Read
38.11
46.95
23%
27.86
-27%
46.58
22%
Seq Write
450.12
1180.85
162%
521.04
16%
1080.63
140%
Seq Read
501.5
2651.5
429%
1404
180%
2805.35
459%
Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 538.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 521.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 334.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 185.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 508 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 468.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 35.48 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 120.7 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11903 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
10349 Points ∼87% -13%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
10263 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=441)
10260 Points ∼86% -14%
Medion Erazer X6603
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7694 Points ∼65% -35%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7683 Points ∼65% -35%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7666 Points ∼64% -36%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15322 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
13279 Points ∼87% -13%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
13075 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=515)
11872 Points ∼77% -23%
Medion Erazer X6603
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9518 Points ∼62% -38%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9450 Points ∼62% -38%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9357 Points ∼61% -39%
3DMark 11 Performance
11106 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
16619 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9249 pontos
Ajuda
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=217)
44.8 fps ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
40.3 fps ∼90%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7300HQ
35.2 fps ∼79% -13%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
34.6 fps ∼77% -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
24.2 fps ∼54% -40%
baixo média alto ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 72.840.3fps
The Evil Within 2 (2017) 36.535.1fps
ELEX (2017) 70.954fps
Fortnite (2018) 91.581.4fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 39.8fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 43.636fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 6259fps

Barulho

Ocioso
30 / 34 / 38 dB
HDD
32 dB
Carga
44 / 55 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7300HQ
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
18%
5%
9%
10%
5%
off / environment *
30
28
7%
30
-0%
30.6
-2%
30.9
-3%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=221)
2%
Idle Minimum *
30
28
7%
30
-0%
30.6
-2%
30.9
-3%
31.6 (28 - 41.7, n=642)
-5%
Idle Average *
34
28
18%
33
3%
30.7
10%
30.9
9%
32.8 (28 - 46.6, n=642)
4%
Idle Maximum *
38
28
26%
37
3%
30.7
19%
31.6
17%
34.7 (28 - 50.4, n=642)
9%
Load Average *
44
30.3
31%
41
7%
43
2%
38.5
12%
40.4 (30.3 - 58, n=643)
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
39.5
21%
42
16%
39.7
21%
Load Maximum *
55
46.5
15%
50
9%
45.8
17%
40.8
26%
47.7 (38.9 - 64, n=643)
13%

* ... smaller is better

 44 °C46 °C44 °C 
 42 °C46 °C43 °C 
 25 °C27 °C28 °C 
Máximo: 46 °C
Médio: 38.3 °C
49 °C51 °C45 °C
52 °C52 °C37 °C
28 °C25 °C26 °C
Máximo: 52 °C
Médio: 40.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  50 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 41.6 °C / 107 F, ranging from 21.1 to 78 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (+0.7 °C / 1.3 F).
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7300HQ
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
13%
-11%
16%
18%
3%
Maximum Upper Side *
46
44
4%
47
-2%
41.1
11%
44.3
4%
45.5 (28 - 68.8, n=608)
1%
Maximum Bottom *
52
43.8
16%
54
-4%
38.8
25%
39.5
24%
49.1 (25.9 - 78, n=606)
6%
Idle Upper Side *
32
26
19%
36
-13%
28.7
10%
24.8
22%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=559)
4%
Idle Bottom *
32
28
12%
40
-25%
26.9
16%
24.6
23%
31.6 (21.1 - 50.3, n=557)
1%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.540.72533.834.13127.629.64033.736.75025.932.3632536.7802543.41002947.512526.150.61602358.220023.161.925020.968.131520.271.740018.675.350018.17863017.980.680019.478.7100020.177.612501877.716001773.9200017.579.8250017.177.6315017.474.7400017.372.3500017.271.963001773.1800016.970.61000016.965.31250016.963.61600016.857.7SPL3088.2N1.479.2median 17.9median 72.3Delta1.97.635.14135.540.236.139.836.839.533.340.333.240.732.741.631.343.1314630.550.429.653.128.356.12757.926.657.626.260.325.664.824.865.824.362.124.365.623.966.623.566.623.465.923.262.722.968.122.974.122.876.822.880.922.873.522.864.122.960.936.184.12.754.8median 24.3median 64.12.15.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 0.7 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 10 / 13 / 19 Watt
Carga midlight 68 / 136 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7300HQ
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
29%
-41%
24%
29%
-68%
Idle Minimum *
10
7.1
29%
18
-80%
4.1
59%
4.7
53%
20.2 (3.9 - 113, n=603)
-102%
Idle Average *
13
7.6
42%
23
-77%
6.9
47%
7.6
42%
25.8 (6.8 - 119, n=603)
-98%
Idle Maximum *
19
8.6
55%
30
-58%
9.5
50%
9.2
52%
30.9 (8.3 - 122, n=603)
-63%
Load Average *
68
59.5
12%
85
-25%
83
-22%
81
-19%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=594)
-53%
Load Maximum *
136
112.8
17%
158
-16%
126
7%
112
18%
166 (21.9 - 590, n=593)
-22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
110
89
19%
96
13%
108
2%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
6h 26min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 25min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 20min
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7300HQ, 55 Wh
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7300HQ, 56 Wh
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 70 Wh
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, 48 Wh
Medion Erazer X6603
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, 45 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
47%
-19%
43%
-19%
-9%
Reader / Idle
386
659
71%
256
-34%
893
131%
340
-12%
329 (39 - 1174, n=591)
-15%
H.264
265
224
-15%
309
17%
227
-14%
244 (88 - 506, n=122)
-8%
WiFi v1.3
275
416
51%
198
-28%
400
45%
257
-7%
249 (78 - 622, n=267)
-9%
Load
80
96
20%
80
0%
63
-21%
46
-42%
78.5 (18 - 202, n=559)
-2%

Pro

+ Ótima relação preço-desempenho
+ Marcos bastante finos
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Bom som
+ Computador gráfico
+ Iluminação RGB
+ Carcaça robusta
+ Design elegante

Contra

- Sistema operacional, software e guia de início rápido somente em chinês
- Equipamento básico escasso (8 GB de RAM, SSD de 128 GB)
- Emissão de ruído desnecessariamente alta
- Tempos de resposta medíocres da tela
- A bateria poderia ser mais potente
- Sem Kensington Lock
- Leitor de cartões não ideal
- Sem Thunderbolt 3
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop

Bens baratos do Extremo Oriente? Embora esse preconceito possa se encaixar em muitos produtos, não combina com o Mi Gaming Laptop. Na maioria das categorias, o portátil de 15 polegadas pode acompanhar facilmente a concorrência ou até superá-la.

Embora a carcaça não seja leve e existam portáteis de gama alta ainda mais finos, ficamos muito entusiasmados com a carcaça. O acabamento, a qualidade dos materiais e o design são irrepreensíveis. Os dispositivos de entrada e o som também se sentem melhor do que em alguns portáteis de 2000 ou 3000 Euros (~$2309-3464).

Mas, claro, nem tudo o que brilha é ouro. A fim de manter o preço atraente, a Xiaomi foi forçada a fazer alguns recortes em alguns detalhes, como o leitor de cartões, o lento desempenho do Wi-Fi ou a falta de certas conexões (Thunderbolt 3, Kensington Lock). Embora 8 GB de RAM e um SSD de 128 GB também sejam escassos, você também pode comprar o dispositivo em uma configuração com 16 GB e um SSD de 256 GB.

Mas poderíamos superar todos esses pontos, em nossa opinião. O que é claramente mais irritante é o alto nível de ruído na operação 3D e o comportamento dos ventiladores sem sentido, no modo inativo. Embora estes sejam fenômenos típicos em portáteis de jogos, os competidores geralmente permitem alivia-los através de ajustes manuais. Se você considera ou não a falta da tecnologia G-Sync como um ponto negativo, é uma questão de gosto. Em vez disso, a Xiaomi implementa o Optimus, o que ajuda a duração da bateria.

A tela deixa alguns sentimentos contraditórios. Por um lado, gostamos do alto contraste e dos ângulos de visão estáveis, mas, por outro lado, alguns dos atuais critérios de gamers (120/144 Hz, tempo de resposta curto) permanecem desatendidos. Antes da compra, você também deve saber que, devido ao software chinês, o Mi Gaming Laptop destina-se apenas de forma limitada para o mercado da UE ou dos EUA. No entanto, aqueles que não se assustam com os obstáculos da entrada e têm a sorte de receber uma unidade diretamente ou através de alguns desvios, receberão um pacote geral bem-sucedido a preço de banana.

No final do dia, o perdedor avança para uma dica privilegiada e consegue uma colocação alta em nossa lista dos 10 melhores portáteis de jogos de orçamento.

Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 - 05/28/2018 v6
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
88 / 98 → 90%
Teclado
87%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
60 / 81 → 74%
Peso
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Bateria
77%
Pantalha
86%
Desempenho do jogos
91%
Desempenho da aplicação
90%
Temperatura
85 / 95 → 90%
Ruído
66 / 90 → 73%
Audio
78%
Médio
79%
85%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop (i5-7300HQ, GTX 1060, Full HD)
Florian Glaser, 2018-06- 3 (Update: 2018-06-21)