Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone ElePhone S7

Marcus Herbrich (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 01/03/2017

Samsung Galaxy S7 replica. O atual modelo premium do fabricante chinês ElePhone S7 foi submetido aos nosso testes. Seu exterior faz lembrar muito à sua contraparte da Samsung. As especificações técnicas do ElePhone S7 são muito promissoras e a primeira impressão também é positiva.

Elephone S7 (S Serie)
Processador
Mediatek Helio X20 MT6797 2.3 GHz , MediaTek Helio X20
Placa gráfica
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 401 PPI, tela táctil capacitiva JDI LTPS OGS, LCD, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 54.1 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 milímetros, Card Reader: micro-SD (máx. 128 GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: sensor de gravidade, sensor de luz, sensor gyro de proximidade, sensor de bússola, OTG, Miracast, status LED
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM:B2/B3/B5/B8 (1900/1800/850/900 MHz) WCDMA:B1/B8 (2100/900 MHz) FDD-LTE:B1/B3/B7/B20 (2100/1800/2600/800 MHz) TDD-LTE:B38/B40(2600/2300 MHz), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.6 x 150.4 x 73.2
Bateria
3000 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.2 câmera traseira com AF & LED flash)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: mono, Teclado: onscreen, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Cabo USB, fonte de alimentação modular, capa de silicone, E-touch 2.0, 12 Meses Garantia, SAR rate (head): 0.265 W/kg, SAR rate (body): 0.507 W/kg, fanless
peso
148 g, Suprimento de energia: 35 g
Preço
220 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
281 MBit/s ∼100% +1319%
Elephone S7
Mali-T880 MP4, Helio X20 MT6797, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
19.8 MBit/s ∼7%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
335 MBit/s ∼100% +475%
Elephone S7
Mali-T880 MP4, Helio X20 MT6797, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
58.3 MBit/s ∼17%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
303 MBit/s ∼100%
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash (5.0 GHz)
109 MBit/s ∼36%
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s ∼34%
Vernee Mars
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
81.1 MBit/s ∼27%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.8 MBit/s ∼16%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
290 MBit/s ∼100%
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash (5.0 GHz)
108 MBit/s ∼37%
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
79.4 MBit/s ∼27%
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.3 MBit/s ∼20%
Vernee Mars
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38.9 MBit/s ∼13%
ElePhone S7
ElePhone S7
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
376
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
379
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
378
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 391 cd/m² Médio: 378.7 cd/m² Minimum: 204 cd/m²
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 391 cd/m²
Contraste: 954:1 (Preto: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.2 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 9.8 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.27
Elephone S7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
ZTE Blade V7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Honor 5C
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
UMI Super Euro Edition
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Vernee Mars
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Blackview R7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Screen
-1%
11%
29%
41%
-19%
52%
Brightness
379
411
8%
498
31%
410
8%
339
-11%
526
39%
552
46%
Brightness Distribution
95
96
1%
93
-2%
85
-11%
85
-11%
91
-4%
96
1%
Black Level *
0.41
0.38
7%
0.49
-20%
0.31
24%
0.14
66%
0.64
-56%
Contrast
954
1076
13%
1051
10%
1348
41%
2464
158%
863
-10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.2
9.4
-15%
6.2
24%
4.4
46%
7.1
13%
11
-34%
1.59
81%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9.8
11.6
-18%
7.4
24%
3.6
63%
6.7
32%
14.3
-46%
2.01
79%
Gamma
2.27 106%
2.25 107%
2.28 105%
2.36 102%
2.47 97%
2.21 109%
2.01 119%
CCT
10108 64%
9597 68%
8664 75%
6993 93%
7711 84%
12996 50%
6321 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.12
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.98

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 959 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 30860) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 37 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (44.3 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Elephone S7
69122 Points ∼37%
ZTE Blade V7
37070 Points ∼20% -46%
Honor 5C
53143 Points ∼29% -23%
UMI Super Euro Edition
50072 Points ∼27% -28%
Vernee Mars
51008 Points ∼28% -26%
Blackview R7
50572 Points ∼27% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼70% +86%
Huawei P9 Plus
98413 Points ∼53% +42%
Geekbench 4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Elephone S7
3827 Points ∼14%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2818 Points ∼11% -26%
Vernee Mars
2903 Points ∼11% -24%
Blackview R7
2851 Points ∼11% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
5503 Points ∼21% +44%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Elephone S7
1545 Points ∼28%
UMI Super Euro Edition
727 Points ∼13% -53%
Vernee Mars
729 Points ∼13% -53%
Blackview R7
728 Points ∼13% -53%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
1840 Points ∼34% +19%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Elephone S7
975 Points ∼38%
ZTE Blade V7
914 Points ∼36% -6%
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼56% +45%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1117 Points ∼44% +15%
Vernee Mars
1338 Points ∼52% +37%
Blackview R7
1242 Points ∼49% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (min: 1594) Points ∼83% +118%
Huawei P9 Plus
2547 Points ∼100% +161%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Elephone S7
493 Points ∼9%
ZTE Blade V7
159 Points ∼3% -68%
Honor 5C
317 Points ∼6% -36%
UMI Super Euro Edition
350 Points ∼7% -29%
Vernee Mars
356 Points ∼7% -28%
Blackview R7
352 Points ∼7% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (min: 2043) Points ∼41% +352%
Huawei P9 Plus
807 Points ∼15% +64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Elephone S7
554 Points ∼14%
ZTE Blade V7
195 Points ∼5% -65%
Honor 5C
383 Points ∼10% -31%
UMI Super Euro Edition
413 Points ∼11% -25%
Vernee Mars
425 Points ∼11% -23%
Blackview R7
419 Points ∼11% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (min: 1923) Points ∼57% +298%
Huawei P9 Plus
952 Points ∼25% +72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Elephone S7
757 Points ∼29%
ZTE Blade V7
944 Points ∼36% +25%
Honor 5C
1418 Points ∼55% +87%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1144 Points ∼44% +51%
Vernee Mars
1100 Points ∼43% +45%
Blackview R7
1155 Points ∼45% +53%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (min: 1539) Points ∼77% +164%
Huawei P9 Plus
2336 Points ∼90% +209%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Elephone S7
614 Points ∼8%
ZTE Blade V7
245 Points ∼3% -60%
Honor 5C
480 Points ∼6% -22%
UMI Super Euro Edition
523 Points ∼7% -15%
Vernee Mars
523 Points ∼7% -15%
Blackview R7
518 Points ∼7% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (min: 2895) Points ∼39% +391%
Huawei P9 Plus
1042 Points ∼13% +70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Elephone S7
641 Points ∼13%
ZTE Blade V7
293 Points ∼6% -54%
Honor 5C
563 Points ∼12% -12%
UMI Super Euro Edition
595 Points ∼12% -7%
Vernee Mars
602 Points ∼12% -6%
Blackview R7
590 Points ∼12% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (min: 2421) Points ∼56% +323%
Huawei P9 Plus
1188 Points ∼24% +85%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Elephone S7
9718 Points ∼14%
ZTE Blade V7
10430 Points ∼15% +7%
Honor 5C
13588 Points ∼20% +40%
UMI Super Euro Edition
11654 Points ∼17% +20%
Vernee Mars
10762 Points ∼16% +11%
Blackview R7
12585 Points ∼18% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
19610 Points ∼28% +102%
Huawei P9 Plus
15331 Points ∼22% +58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Elephone S7
12649 Points ∼3%
ZTE Blade V7
6170 Points ∼1% -51%
Honor 5C
11319 Points ∼2% -11%
UMI Super Euro Edition
10567 Points ∼2% -16%
Vernee Mars
10685 Points ∼2% -16%
Blackview R7
10334 Points ∼2% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
33031 Points ∼7% +161%
Huawei P9 Plus
21807 Points ∼5% +72%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Elephone S7
11854 Points ∼6%
ZTE Blade V7
6786 Points ∼3% -43%
Honor 5C
11755 Points ∼6% -1%
UMI Super Euro Edition
10791 Points ∼5% -9%
Vernee Mars
10702 Points ∼5% -10%
Blackview R7
10762 Points ∼5% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28671 Points ∼15% +142%
Huawei P9 Plus
19936 Points ∼10% +68%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Elephone S7
13 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7
12 fps ∼1% -8%
Honor 5C
19 fps ∼1% +46%
UMI Super Euro Edition
17 fps ∼1% +31%
Vernee Mars
17 fps ∼1% +31%
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼1% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
81 fps ∼6% +523%
Huawei P9 Plus
41 fps ∼3% +215%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Elephone S7
14 fps ∼3%
ZTE Blade V7
12 fps ∼3% -14%
Honor 5C
20 fps ∼4% +43%
UMI Super Euro Edition
18 fps ∼4% +29%
Vernee Mars
18 fps ∼4% +29%
Blackview R7
17 fps ∼4% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
51 fps ∼11% +264%
Huawei P9 Plus
43 fps ∼9% +207%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Elephone S7
5.9 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7
4.5 fps ∼1% -24%
Honor 5C
7.9 fps ∼1% +34%
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.1 fps ∼1% +20%
Vernee Mars
7.1 fps ∼1% +20%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼1% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
38 fps ∼7% +544%
Huawei P9 Plus
18 fps ∼3% +205%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Elephone S7
6.5 fps ∼3%
ZTE Blade V7
4.5 fps ∼2% -31%
Honor 5C
8.4 fps ∼4% +29%
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.5 fps ∼3% +15%
Vernee Mars
7.6 fps ∼3% +17%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps ∼2% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
27 fps ∼12% +315%
Huawei P9 Plus
19 fps ∼8% +192%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Elephone S7
6.1 fps ∼1%
ZTE Blade V7
2.9 fps ∼1% -52%
Honor 5C
4.5 fps ∼1% -26%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4.7 fps ∼1% -23%
Vernee Mars
4.8 fps ∼1% -21%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼1% -59%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼7% +359%
Huawei P9 Plus
10 fps ∼2% +64%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Elephone S7
5.7 fps ∼3%
ZTE Blade V7
2.9 fps ∼2% -49%
Honor 5C
4.9 fps ∼3% -14%
UMI Super Euro Edition
5.1 fps ∼3% -11%
Vernee Mars
5.1 fps ∼3% -11%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps ∼1% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼9% +163%
Huawei P9 Plus
11 fps ∼6% +93%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Elephone S7
4433 Points ∼55%
ZTE Blade V7
3947 Points ∼49% -11%
Honor 5C
5120 Points ∼63% +15%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4596 Points ∼57% +4%
Vernee Mars
4554 Points ∼56% +3%
Blackview R7
4364 Points ∼54% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼57% +5%
Huawei P9 Plus
7159 Points ∼88% +61%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Elephone S7
888 Points ∼58%
ZTE Blade V7
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Honor 5C
707 Points ∼46% -20%
UMI Super Euro Edition
771 Points ∼50% -13%
Vernee Mars
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Blackview R7
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
994 Points ∼64% +12%
Huawei P9 Plus
1049 Points ∼68% +18%
Graphics (sort by value)
Elephone S7
1517 Points ∼18%
ZTE Blade V7
430 Points ∼5% -72%
Honor 5C
814 Points ∼9% -46%
UMI Super Euro Edition
666 Points ∼8% -56%
Vernee Mars
665 Points ∼8% -56%
Blackview R7
655 Points ∼8% -57%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼26% +45%
Huawei P9 Plus
1512 Points ∼18% 0%
Memory (sort by value)
Elephone S7
1265 Points ∼33%
ZTE Blade V7
790 Points ∼21% -38%
Honor 5C
1504 Points ∼39% +19%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1052 Points ∼27% -17%
Vernee Mars
1005 Points ∼26% -21%
Blackview R7
1030 Points ∼27% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼54% +64%
Huawei P9 Plus
2667 Points ∼69% +111%
System (sort by value)
Elephone S7
3252 Points ∼49%
ZTE Blade V7
1188 Points ∼18% -63%
Honor 5C
2600 Points ∼40% -20%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2187 Points ∼33% -33%
Vernee Mars
2291 Points ∼35% -30%
Blackview R7
1971 Points ∼30% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼62% +25%
Huawei P9 Plus
3932 Points ∼60% +21%
Overall (sort by value)
Elephone S7
1534 Points ∼47%
ZTE Blade V7
249 Points ∼8% -84%
Honor 5C
1225 Points ∼37% -20%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1043 Points ∼32% -32%
Vernee Mars
348 Points ∼11% -77%
Blackview R7
338 Points ∼10% -78%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼63% +35%
Huawei P9 Plus
2019 Points ∼62% +32%

Legend

 
Elephone S7 Mediatek Helio X20 MT6797, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Super Euro Edition Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Vernee Mars Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview R7 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Huawei P9 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 955, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
ZTE Blade V7 (Chrome Version 50)
13761.1 ms * ∼100% -328%
Blackview R7 (Chrome Version 52)
9748.3 ms * ∼71% -203%
UMI Super Euro Edition (Chrome 53)
9410.2 ms * ∼68% -192%
Vernee Mars (Chrome Version 54)
9376.1 ms * ∼68% -191%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
9111.2 ms * ∼66% -183%
Elephone S7 (Chrome Version 55)
3217.8 ms * ∼23%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
2564.1 ms * ∼19% +20%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
13191 Points ∼100% +249%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
4188 Points ∼32% +11%
UMI Super Euro Edition (Chrome 53)
4117 Points ∼31% +9%
Vernee Mars (Chrome Version 54)
4073 Points ∼31% +8%
Blackview R7 (Chrome Version 52)
3885 Points ∼29% +3%
Elephone S7 (Chrome Version 55)
3780 Points ∼29%
ZTE Blade V7 (Chrome Version 50)
2689 Points ∼20% -29%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
75.12 Points ∼100% +67%
Elephone S7 (Chrome Version 55)
45.033 Points ∼60%
Honor 5C (Chrome 51)
27.934 Points ∼37% -38%
Vernee Mars (Chrome Version 54)
27.099 Points ∼36% -40%
UMI Super Euro Edition (Chrome 53)
26.211 Points ∼35% -42%
Blackview R7 (Chrome Version 52)
25.349 Points ∼34% -44%
ZTE Blade V7 (Chrome Version 50)
18.19 Points ∼24% -60%

* ... smaller is better

Elephone S7
Mali-T880 MP4, Helio X20 MT6797, 64 GB eMMC Flash
ZTE Blade V7
Mali-T720 MP4, MT6753, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Vernee Mars
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
56%
14%
21%
-5%
136%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
18.57 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
20.89 ( Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
12%
24.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
30%
17.88 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-4%
24
29%
11.87
-36%
50.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
171%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
32.86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
43.67 ( Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
33%
51.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
58%
36.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
10%
44.5
35%
15.56
-53%
76.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
133%
Random Write 4KB
7.89
7.58
-4%
15.7
99%
11.88
51%
15.77
100%
11.4
44%
15.79
100%
Random Read 4KB
21.8
28.07
29%
61.7
183%
28.17
29%
21.66
-1%
28.02
29%
86.71
298%
Sequential Write 256KB
167.07
39.45
-76%
75.5
-55%
126.95
-24%
71.58
-57%
122.67
-27%
145.11
-13%
Sequential Read 256KB
213.8
196.76
-8%
263
23%
257.8
21%
255.87
20%
247.58
16%
487.34
128%
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high34 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high27 fps
 very low30 fps
Carga Máxima
 37.5 °C37.1 °C35.6 °C 
 37.4 °C37.3 °C36.5 °C 
 36 °C34.8 °C36.2 °C 
Máximo: 37.5 °C
Médio: 36.5 °C
33 °C33.9 °C42.4 °C
32.5 °C34.5 °C42.2 °C
32.7 °C33.7 °C39.4 °C
Máximo: 42.4 °C
Médio: 36 °C
alimentação elétrica  35.7 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.637.82525.434.73125.333.74032.934.15033.641.26331.636.28028.424.81002725.212520.822.91602227.920021.327.525020.833.131521.240.940019.446.850019.553.163017.760.380017.967.6100017.874.5125017.378.1160017.476.9200016.777.1250017.277.3315018.281.4400017.984.9500017.680.1630017.774.7800017.873.51000017.974.11250018.172.41600018.261.6SPL3090.5N1.374median 17.9Elephone S7median 72.4Delta1.316.140.632.932.440.641.629.831.341.634.532.131.734.538.140.92638.134.437.839.434.425.627.836.225.629.727.928.629.733.127.525.433.134.924.821.334.941.320.623.341.34526.122.54552.531.322.452.557.837.821.357.859.639.918.459.663.445.417.563.469.950.817.569.971.553.117.271.572.255.216.872.274.757.817.374.774.957.717.474.977.959.416.677.980.361.817.380.380.760.817.680.776.154.717.676.175.954.617.775.979.760.517.479.773.354.317.773.367.849.717.967.866.847.718.166.858.133.518.158.188.769.729.888.773.823.11.373.8median 69.9Samsung Galaxy S7 Edgemedian 50.8median 17.7median 69.99.911.71.69.932.537.232.432.532.733.631.332.723.531.231.723.530.833.52630.841.139.139.441.132.933.436.232.928.930.728.628.926.425.825.426.427.324.821.327.328.325.823.328.332.62422.532.638.624.722.438.646.432.421.346.454.537.518.454.55942.917.55959.549.517.559.562.750.117.262.766.952.516.866.971.155.517.371.175.358.217.475.379.162.916.679.180.463.817.380.479.162.217.679.177.660.117.677.675.357.417.775.374.657.417.474.674.356.517.774.372.354.517.972.364.145.818.164.146.227.918.146.287.971.229.887.964.123.81.364.1median 64.1Honor 5Cmedian 50.1median 17.7median 64.114.612.21.614.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Elephone S7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.54 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 42.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Honor 5C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 15%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.18 / 0.37 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.42 / 1.87 / 2.11 Watt
Carga midlight 6.16 / 10.67 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Elephone S7
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V7
2540 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
Vernee Mars
3000 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Power Consumption
45%
24%
14%
23%
-29%
33%
Idle Minimum *
1.42
0.73
49%
0.89
37%
0.84
41%
1.02
28%
1.83
-29%
0.63
56%
Idle Average *
1.87
0.92
51%
2.07
-11%
1.94
-4%
1.69
10%
3.21
-72%
1.1
41%
Idle Maximum *
2.11
0.93
56%
2.15
-2%
2.07
2%
1.82
14%
3.45
-64%
1.56
26%
Load Average *
6.16
4.47
27%
3.46
44%
5.88
5%
4.39
29%
5.67
8%
5.95
3%
Load Maximum *
10.67
5.96
44%
5.18
51%
7.67
28%
6.79
36%
9.16
14%
6.7
37%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
8h 03min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
3h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 34min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 48min
Elephone S7
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V7
2540 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
Vernee Mars
3000 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3600 mAh
Battery Runtime
133%
85%
173%
91%
85%
195%
Reader / Idle
483
997
106%
1254
160%
1663
244%
Load
168
156
-7%
392
133%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
223
519
133%
584
162%
638
186%
427
91%
412
85%
732
228%
H.264
334
602
80%
914
174%

Pro

+ Painel IPS Full HD
+ 4 GB de RAM
+ 64 GB de armazenamento
+ Dual-SIM
+ Design e visual
+ Construção
+ Leitor de digitais

Contra

- Módulo WiFi
- Desvantagens no desempenho
- Alto falante
- Câmera
- Lento armazenamento eMMC
- Brilho mínimo
In review: ElePhone S7. Test model courtesy of ElePhone.
In review: ElePhone S7. Test model courtesy of ElePhone.

Se tivéssemos que resumir o ElePhone S7 em uma frase, nosso veredicto exagerado seria: Belo na superfície, mas não muita substância por dentro.

O visual da carcaça e a construção são muito bons para essa faixa de preços. O painel IPS é suficientemente nítido e suficientemente brilhante para o uso diário. Nós também gostamos bastante da qualidade das chamadas e o sensor de digitais que funciona uito bem.

A curta duração da bateria, causada pelo ineficiente gerenciamento de energia, por um lado, e pelo alto brilho mínimo da tela, por outro lado, não ajudam o smartphone da ElePhone. Além disso, o desempenho não está no nível dos rivais diretos, apesar do SoC MediaTek de alto desempenho. Outros pontos de crítica, como a lenta memória do sistema, a câmera medíocre e a qualidade dos alto falantes, e as baixas taxas de transferência do módulo Wi-Fi, não resultam em um conceito bem finalizado. Em nossa opinião, o Honor 5C ou Vernee Mars (ambos disponíveis na Alemanha mediante companhias importadoras) são alternativas melhores.

O original será necessário para uma sensação do Galaxy S7 - pelo  menos o ElePhone S7 não é uma alternativa real. Inclusive comparado com concorrentes diretos, o smartphone de gama média não conseguiu nos convencer.

Elephone S7 - 12/22/2016 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Acabamento
86%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
84%
Conectividade
41 / 60 → 68%
Peso
93%
Bateria
78%
Pantalha
80%
Desempenho do jogos
26 / 63 → 41%
Desempenho da aplicação
51 / 70 → 72%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
100%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
60%
Médio
70%
79%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone ElePhone S7
Marcus Herbrich, 2017-01- 3 (Update: 2017-01-17)