Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P9 Plus

Andreas Osthoff, Tanja Hinum, 07/13/2016

Será que tudo é melhor com o Plus? O novo P9 Plus da Huawei não é apenas uma versão maior do P9 padrão, a tela também é completamente diferente da do irmão menor. O recurso Press Touch também está reservado para o modelo Plus.

Huawei P9 Plus (P9 Serie)
Placa gráfica
Memória
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, capacitive, 10 touch points, AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 52 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm audio, Card Reader: microSD até 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Proximity, rotation, accelerometer and G-sensor, digital compass, step counter, USB-OTG, WiFi-Direct, Miracast
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G GSM(850/900/1800/1900MHz), 3G UMTS (800/850/900/1900/2100 MHz), LTE Cat.6 (Bands 1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/26/28), LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 6.98 x 152.3 x 75.3
Bateria
3400 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Leica dual-camera, Summarit-H 27 mm f/2.2 ASPH, BSI CMOS, 2-tone LED-flash, Full-HD video)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.4)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falantes estéreo, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força (10 Watts), cabo USB, ferramenta para SIM, headset, capa protetora, guia de inpicio rápido, EMUI 4.1, Phone Manager, HiCare, Health, Designs, Mirror, Compass, Recorder, Memo, 36 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
162 g, Suprimento de energia: 74 g
Preço
699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Huawei P9 Plus: overview
Huawei P9 Plus: overview
Huawei P9 Plus: crossing
Huawei P9 Plus: crossing
Huawei P9 Plus: turning point
Huawei P9 Plus: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: overview
Garmin Edge 500: crossing
Garmin Edge 500: crossing
Garmin Edge 500: turning Point
Garmin Edge 500: turning Point

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
341
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
344
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
359
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 392 cd/m² Médio: 365.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.97 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 361 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.1 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
Gamma: 2.24
Huawei P9 Plus
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7
Motorola Moto X Force
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.4
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5
OnePlus 3
Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Huawei P9
IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2
Screen
53%
36%
21%
19%
-20%
12%
29%
Brightness middle
361
554
53%
583
61%
297
-18%
337
-7%
560
55%
419
16%
582
61%
Brightness
366
552
51%
560
53%
297
-19%
336
-8%
541
48%
431
18%
563
54%
Brightness Distribution
87
96
10%
91
5%
93
7%
91
5%
85
-2%
84
-3%
91
5%
Black Level *
0.46
0.45
0.38
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.1
1.59
69%
3.55
30%
2.67
48%
3.99
22%
9.19
-80%
4.1
20%
4.4
14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10
2.56
74%
3.98
60%
7.07
29%
15.01
-50%
12
-20%
7.4
26%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.5
2.01
63%
3.88
29%
2.81
49%
1.66
70%
10.58
-92%
3.3
40%
4.8
13%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.01 109%
2.2 100%
2.08 106%
2.32 95%
2.7 81%
2.1 105%
2.2 100%
CCT
7388 88%
6321 103%
7280 89%
6379 102%
6584 99%
9760 67%
6550 99%
6175 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.12
59.05
66.31
73.19
89.38
77.78
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.98
92.8
99.79
100
99.44
Contrast
1267
1244
1532

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9152 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
142090 Points ∼100% +44%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
133626 Points ∼94% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
128749 Points ∼91% +31%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
98413 Points ∼69%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
95743 Points ∼67% -3%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
94122 Points ∼66% -4%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
89911 Points ∼63% -9%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
78324 Points ∼55% -20%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
6556 Points ∼100%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
6522 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
6480 (min: 6415) Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
5645 Points ∼86% -14%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
4791 Points ∼73% -27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
4492 Points ∼69% -31%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
4429 Points ∼68% -32%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
2538 Points ∼100% +32%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
2398 Points ∼94% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2170 (min: 2120) Points ∼86% +12%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
1929 Points ∼76%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
1767 Points ∼70% -8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1335 Points ∼53% -31%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1262 Points ∼50% -35%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
2425 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
1935 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
1811 Points ∼75% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
3249 Points ∼100% +300%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2394 Points ∼74% +194%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
813 Points ∼25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
2823 Points ∼100% +196%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2234 Points ∼79% +134%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
954 Points ∼34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
2411 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
1912 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
1773 Points ∼74% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
4804 Points ∼100% +340%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
3071 Points ∼64% +181%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
1091 Points ∼23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
3595 Points ∼100% +189%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2641 Points ∼73% +113%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
1242 Points ∼35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
2547 Points ∼100%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
2503 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2121 (min: 1594) Points ∼83% -17%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
1892 Points ∼74% -26%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
1676 Points ∼66% -34%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1402 Points ∼55% -45%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1351 Points ∼53% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
2864 Points ∼100% +255%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
2601 Points ∼91% +222%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2229 (min: 2043) Points ∼78% +176%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
2067 Points ∼72% +156%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1074 Points ∼38% +33%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
829 Points ∼29% +3%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
807 Points ∼28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
2571 Points ∼100% +170%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
2318 Points ∼90% +143%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2204 (min: 1923) Points ∼86% +132%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1849 Points ∼72% +94%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1132 Points ∼44% +19%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
974 Points ∼38% +2%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
952 Points ∼37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
2510 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
2336 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2002 (min: 1539) Points ∼80% -14%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
1789 Points ∼71% -23%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
1697 Points ∼68% -27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1348 Points ∼54% -42%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1282 Points ∼51% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
4633 Points ∼100% +345%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
4557 Points ∼98% +337%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
3226 Points ∼70% +210%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
3015 (min: 2895) Points ∼65% +189%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
2336 Points ∼50% +124%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
1080 Points ∼23% +4%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
1042 Points ∼22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
3424 Points ∼100% +188%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
3316 Points ∼97% +179%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2710 (min: 2421) Points ∼79% +128%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
2413 Points ∼70% +103%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
2009 Points ∼59% +69%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
1237 Points ∼36% +4%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
1188 Points ∼35%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
21771 Points ∼100% +42%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
19610 Points ∼90% +28%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
15517 Points ∼71% +1%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
15331 Points ∼70%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
12854 Points ∼59% -16%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
12852 Points ∼59% -16%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
11963 Points ∼55% -22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
41615 Points ∼100% +91%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
38394 Points ∼92% +76%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
37725 Points ∼91% +73%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
34023 Points ∼82% +56%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
33031 Points ∼79% +51%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
21807 Points ∼52%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
21577 Points ∼52% -1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
30241 Points ∼100% +52%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
28671 Points ∼95% +44%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
27795 Points ∼92% +39%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
26380 Points ∼87% +32%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
25751 Points ∼85% +29%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
19936 Points ∼66%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
19854 Points ∼66% 0%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
Points
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
Points
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
Points
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
Points
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
Points
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
89 fps ∼100% +117%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
81 fps ∼91% +98%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
78.9 fps ∼89% +92%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
58 fps ∼65% +41%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
56 fps ∼63% +37%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
41 fps ∼46%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
40 fps ∼45% -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
27.11 fps ∼30% -34%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +40%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
59 fps ∼98% +37%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
52 fps ∼87% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
51 fps ∼85% +19%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
43 fps ∼72% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
43 fps ∼72%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
42 fps ∼70% -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
18.75 fps ∼31% -56%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
47 fps ∼100% +161%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
38.4 fps ∼82% +113%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
38 fps ∼81% +111%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
27 fps ∼57% +50%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
25 fps ∼53% +39%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
18 fps ∼38% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
18 fps ∼38%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
17.54 fps ∼37% -3%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
46 fps ∼100% +142%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
38.4 fps ∼83% +102%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
27 fps ∼59% +42%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
27 fps ∼59% +42%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
19 fps ∼41% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼41%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
17 fps ∼37% -11%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
11.81 fps ∼26% -38%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
31 fps ∼100% +210%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
28 fps ∼90% +180%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
28 fps ∼90% +180%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
20 fps ∼65% +100%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
18 fps ∼58% +80%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
10 fps ∼32% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
10 fps ∼32%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
30 fps ∼100% +173%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
28 fps ∼93% +155%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
19 fps ∼63% +73%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
15 fps ∼50% +36%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
12 fps ∼40% +9%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
11 fps ∼37% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
11 fps ∼37%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
12 fps ∼100%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
4.7 fps ∼39%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
7.1 fps ∼100%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
2.5 fps ∼35%
Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
19 fps ∼100%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
7.5 fps ∼39%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
19 fps ∼100%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
6.9 fps ∼36%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
18 fps ∼100% +190%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
15 fps ∼83% +142%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
12 fps ∼67% +94%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
6.5 fps ∼36% +5%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
6.2 fps ∼34%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
5.8 fps ∼32% -6%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
18 fps ∼100% +165%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
7.9 fps ∼44% +16%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
7.3 fps ∼41% +7%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
7.1 fps ∼39% +4%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
6.8 fps ∼38%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
6.1 fps ∼34% -10%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 battery life
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
383 min ∼100%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
min ∼0%
Work 2.0 performance score
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
5765 Points ∼100%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
5226 Points ∼91%
Work performance score
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
7159 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
7101 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
7058 Points ∼99% -1%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
5365 Points ∼75% -25%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
5094 Points ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
4660 Points ∼65% -35%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
1199 Points ∼100% +14%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
1112 Points ∼93% +6%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
1049 Points ∼87%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
1029 Points ∼86% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
994 Points ∼83% -5%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
986 Points ∼82% -6%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
939 Points ∼78% -10%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
837 Points ∼70% -20%
Graphics
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
4813 Points ∼100% +218%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
4299 Points ∼89% +184%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
3376 Points ∼70% +123%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
3137 Points ∼65% +107%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2203 Points ∼46% +46%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
2040 Points ∼42% +35%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
1583 Points ∼33% +5%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
1512 Points ∼31%
Memory
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
2667 Points ∼100%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
2627 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2072 Points ∼78% -22%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
2052 Points ∼77% -23%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1945 Points ∼73% -27%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
1124 Points ∼42% -58%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1085 Points ∼41% -59%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
876 Points ∼33% -67%
System
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
4080 Points ∼100% +4%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
3932 Points ∼96%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
3930 Points ∼96% 0%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
3925 Points ∼96% 0%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
3537 Points ∼87% -10%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
2878 Points ∼71% -27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
2737 Points ∼67% -30%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1386 Points ∼34% -65%
Overall
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
2496 Points ∼100% +24%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
2206 Points ∼88% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2074 Points ∼83% +3%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
2025 Points ∼81% 0%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
2019 Points ∼81%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1774 Points ∼71% -12%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1649 Points ∼66% -18%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
1465 Points ∼59% -27%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
5552.9 ms * ∼100% -99%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
4377.1 ms * ∼79% -57%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
4080.1 ms * ∼73% -46%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
2922.6 ms * ∼53% -5%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
2920.7 ms * ∼53% -5%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
2792.3 ms * ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
2564.1 ms * ∼46% +8%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
1743 ms * ∼31% +38%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
15967 Points ∼100% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
13191 Points ∼83% +9%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
12058 Points ∼76%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
11783 Points ∼74% -2%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
9155 Points ∼57% -24%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
8851 Points ∼55% -27%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
8699 Points ∼54% -28%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
8059 Points ∼50% -33%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
118.7 Points ∼100% +70%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
75.12 Points ∼63% +7%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
70 Points ∼59%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
68.4 Points ∼58% -2%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
54.4 Points ∼46% -22%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
49.373 Points ∼42% -29%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
48.2 Points ∼41% -31%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
46 Points ∼39% -34%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9, A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 2048
190 Points ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8890 Octa, Mali-T880 MP12, 4096
163 Points ∼86% +25%
Huawei P9 Plus
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 4096
130 Points ∼68%
Huawei P9
Kirin 955, Mali-T880 MP4, 3072
128 Points ∼67% -2%
OnePlus 3
820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 6144
122 Points ∼64% -6%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
113 Points ∼59% -13%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
106 Points ∼56% -18%
Motorola Moto X Force
810 MSM8994, Adreno 430, 3072
103 Points ∼54% -21%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P9 Plus
64 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Motorola Moto X Force
32 GB eMMC Flash
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
32 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus 3
64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Huawei P9
32 GB eMMC Flash
AndroBench 3-5
42%
-11%
-41%
60%
-12%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
24.95
50.36
102%
46.96
88%
24.83
0%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
62.48
76.43
22%
79.04
27%
55.05
-12%
Random Write 4KB
51.23
15.79
-69%
19.78
-61%
14.53
-72%
18.23
-64%
47.45
-7%
Random Read 4KB
39.33
86.71
120%
22.55
-43%
19.11
-51%
137.62
250%
39
-1%
Sequential Write 256KB
140.38
145.11
3%
47.99
-66%
99.4
-29%
153.3
9%
72.19
-49%
Sequential Read 256KB
284.27
487.34
71%
252.03
-11%
256.75
-10%
408.71
44%
281.26
-1%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high30 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high56 fps
Carga Máxima
 40.9 °C41.2 °C36.1 °C 
 41.1 °C40.8 °C36.2 °C 
 39.6 °C38.6 °C36.4 °C 
Máximo: 41.2 °C
Médio: 39 °C
35.1 °C36.4 °C38 °C
35.1 °C37 °C38 °C
34.5 °C36.8 °C37.8 °C
Máximo: 38 °C
Médio: 36.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  31.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.09 / 0.62 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.87 / 1.2 / 1.27 Watt
Carga midlight 4.69 / 5.63 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Huawei P9 Plus
Mali-T880 MP4, 1920x1080
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 2560x1440
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 1920x1080
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 2560x1440
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 2560x1440
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 3840x2160
OnePlus 3
Adreno 530, 1920x1080
Huawei P9
Mali-T880 MP4, 1920x1080
Power Consumption
-7%
-14%
-138%
-26%
-60%
-18%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
0.87
0.63
28%
0.5
43%
2.85
-228%
0.96
-10%
0.83
5%
0.57
34%
0.77
11%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.1
8%
1.9
-58%
2.95
-146%
1.35
-13%
2.36
-97%
1.24
-3%
2.36
-97%
Idle Maximum *
1.27
1.56
-23%
2.2
-73%
3.26
-157%
1.4
-10%
2.42
-91%
1.36
-7%
2.37
-87%
Load Average *
4.69
5.95
-27%
3.2
32%
8.92
-90%
6.11
-30%
7.27
-55%
5.92
-26%
3.09
34%
Load Maximum *
5.63
6.7
-19%
6.4
-14%
9.39
-67%
9.43
-67%
9.18
-63%
10.53
-87%
5.35
5%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
24h 06min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 51)
8h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 56min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 23min
Huawei P9 Plus
 Wh, 3400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.86 Wh, 3600 mAh
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
10 Wh, 2750 mAh
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
13 Wh, 3340 mAh
Motorola Moto X Force
 Wh, 3760 mAh
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
13 Wh, 3430 mAh
OnePlus 3
 Wh, 3000 mAh
Huawei P9
11.46 Wh, 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
30%
-6%
-27%
2%
-27%
16%
-9%
Reader / Idle
1446
1663
15%
1655
14%
1078
-25%
1610
11%
1277
-12%
1338
-7%
1514
5%
H.264
776
914
18%
714
-8%
611
-21%
710
-9%
411
-47%
847
9%
568
-27%
WiFi v1.3
530
732
38%
513
-3%
369
-30%
426
-20%
372
-30%
840
58%
569
7%
Load
263
392
49%
197
-25%
179
-32%
330
25%
210
-20%
268
2%
206
-22%

Pro

+ SoC veloz
+ Armazenamento expansível
+ Ampla gama de frequências
+ Boas câmeras
+ Qualidade da voz
+ Headset incluído
+ Carga rápida
+ USB Tipo C
+ Muito boas durações da bateria
+ Press Touch
+ Infravermelhos
+ Capa incluída
+ 3 anos de garantia
+ Bons alto falantes

Contra

- Apenas USB 2.0
- Somente LTE Cat. 6
- Sem MHL, nem SlimPort
- Leve afogamento do SoC sob carga contínua
- Sem gravação de vídeos em 4K
- Sem rádio FM
- Caro
In review: Huawei P9 Plus. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.
In review: Huawei P9 Plus. Test model courtesy of Huawei Germany.

O Huawei P9 Plus não é apenas uma versão maior do P9 padrão. O fabricante não equipa o modelo Plus apenas com uma tela e uma bateria maiores, mas também implementa diversos recursos adicionais e inclusive usa uma tecnologia de tela completamente diferente. O emissor de infravermelhos e o alto falante adicional certamente serão um valor agregado para alguns usuários, mas o recurso Press Touch ainda está na infância para Android. Por enquanto, os menus de contexto somente estão disponíveis para os aplicativos próprios da Huawei. O recurso somente foi realmente útil para o zoom de fotos em nossa opinião, mas a situação deve melhorar com o tempo.

A grande questão é obviamente se o P9 Plus vale os 130 Euros (~$143) adicionais. A resposta não é simples, porque ambos os modelos são basicamente iguais em termos de recursos principais como a carcaça, conectividade, câmera, qualidade da voz e o desempenho. Se considerar todas as melhorias (o dobro de armazenamento, mais RAM, tela maior, bateria maior, recursos adicionais), o preço adicional provavelmente se justifica, motivo pelo qual podemos recomendar ambos os modelos.

O Huawei P9 Plus consegue justificar o seu preço adicional sobre o P9 padrão. Nós recebemos um ótimo smartphone de gama alta com características muito boas; somente os recursos do smartphone chinês não consegue atender nossas expectativas.

O P9 Plus certamente não é uma barganha por 700 Euros (~$774), mas o smartphone não tem porque se esconder atrás dos rivais. Apenas a qualidade do vídeo (sem 4K) e o desempenho gráfico ficam atrás de alguns rivais, mas pelo menos, o último, não é notório na prática. Que o P9 Plus ainda receba uma pontuação total inferior à do P9 padrão, apesar dos recursos adicionais, é um resultado das medições um pouco inferiores da tela (incluindo PWM).

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Huawei P9 Plus - 07/01/2016 v5.1
Andreas Osthoff

Acabamento
93%
Teclado
71 / 75 → 94%
Mouse
96%
Conectividade
55 / 60 → 92%
Peso
91%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
48 / 63 → 77%
Desempenho da aplicação
63 / 70 → 89%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
79 / 91 → 87%
Camera
81%
Médio
80%
89%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei P9 Plus
Andreas Osthoff, 2016-07-13 (Update: 2016-07-14)