Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 04/10/2016

Estabelece padrões! O Galaxy S7 Edge certamente não é um pacote de inovações revolucionárias, mas ele fusiona tecnologia premium de última geração em sua carcaça e atualmente é considerado o modelo de referência em sua classe. No entanto, há alguns pontos de crítica e teríamos desejado que a Samsung tivesse sido um pouco mais intrépida em alguns pontos.

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Galaxy Serie)
Processador
Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa 2.6 GHz
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T880 MP12, Análises do: 650 MHz, Vulkan, OpenGL ES 3.1
Memória
4096 MB 
, LP-DDR4 RAM
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 16:9, 2560x1440 pixel, Tela táctil capacitiva, multi-touch de 10 pontos, tela de duas bordas, Super AMOLED, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 32 GB 
, 24.4 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector combinado para fones e microfone (3,5 mm), Card Reader: micro-SD máx. 200 GB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sesnor de proximidade, acelerômetro, sensor de posição, sensor de luz ambiente, sesnro de rotação, sensor de orientação, sensor g, bússola digital, barômetro, monitor de ritmo cardíaco, OTG, Ant+, MST
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.7 x 150.9 x 72.6
Bateria
13.86 Wh, 3600 mAh Lítio-Ion, 3.85 volts
Sistema Operativo
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 12.2 MPix (Sony-IMX260 sensor, f/1.7, auto foco, estabilizador de imagem, foco rastreador, HDR, vídeo UHD, câmera lenta, câmera veloz, suporte para RAW)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (foco fixo, f/1.7, HDR, Modo Beleza
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto falante mono, Teclado: virtual, Fonte de alimentação, cabo de dados, adaptador OTG, headset, guia de início rápido, notas de segurança, TouchWiz UI, Gear, Galaxy apps, S Health, S Voice, voice recorder, S Planner, myGalaxy, upday, 24 Meses Garantia, Certificação IP68, head-SAR: 0.264 W/kg, body SAR: 0.507 W/kg, Carga rápida, carregamento sem fio (WPC/PMA), fanless
peso
157 g
Preço
799 Euro

 

Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the zoom step. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
555
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 557 cd/m² Médio: 551.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.77 cd/m²
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 554 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.59 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.01 | - Ø
99.98% sRGB (Argyll) 82.12% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.01
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Google Nexus 6P
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7
Huawei Mate 8
IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 6
Screen
-18%
-186%
-29%
-43%
-10%
-67%
Brightness
552
338
-39%
541
-2%
297
-46%
560
1%
365
-34%
513
-7%
Brightness Distribution
96
94
-2%
85
-11%
93
-3%
91
-5%
90
-6%
94
-2%
Black Level *
0.45
0.46
0.35
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.59
2.2
-38%
9.19
-478%
2.67
-68%
3.55
-123%
2.34
-47%
5.08
-219%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.01
2.37
-18%
10.58
-426%
2.81
-40%
3.88
-93%
1.03
49%
5.49
-173%
Gamma
2.01 119%
2.41 100%
2.7 89%
2.08 115%
2.2 109%
2.23 108%
2.08 115%
CCT
6321 103%
6425 101%
9760 67%
6379 102%
7280 89%
6429 101%
7254 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.12
87.77
7%
73.19
-11%
66.31
-19%
59.05
-28%
79.95
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.98
99.79
0%
92.8
-7%
99.84
0%
Contrast
1244
1267
1469

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (44.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 959 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 30860) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6480 (min: 6415) Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
5619 Points ∼17% -13%
Huawei Mate 8
6265 Points ∼19% -3%
Huawei Mate S
3970 Points ∼12% -39%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4429 Points ∼14% -32%
OnePlus 2
4804 Points ∼15% -26%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
4492 Points ∼14% -31%
Google Nexus 6P
4587 Points ∼14% -29%
LG G4
3556 Points ∼11% -45%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
5500 Points ∼17% -15%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2170 (min: 2120) Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1503 Points ∼32% -31%
Huawei Mate 8
1721 Points ∼36% -21%
Huawei Mate S
941 Points ∼20% -57%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2538 Points ∼53% +17%
OnePlus 2
1140 Points ∼24% -47%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1335 Points ∼28% -38%
Google Nexus 6P
1335 Points ∼28% -38%
LG G4
1107 Points ∼23% -49%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2376 Points ∼50% +9%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (min: 1594) Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1320 Points ∼52% -38%
Huawei Mate 8
2552 Points ∼100% +20%
Huawei Mate S
1051 Points ∼41% -50%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus (Metal)
1676 Points ∼66% -21%
OnePlus 2
1517 Points ∼59% -28%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1402 Points ∼55% -34%
Google Nexus 6P
1317 Points ∼52% -38%
LG G4
1216 Points ∼48% -43%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
1288 Points ∼50% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (min: 2043) Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1152 Points ∼21% -48%
Huawei Mate 8
801 Points ∼15% -64%
Huawei Mate S
259 Points ∼5% -88%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus (Metal)
2601 Points ∼48% +17%
OnePlus 2
846 Points ∼16% -62%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1074 Points ∼20% -52%
Google Nexus 6P
1589 Points ∼30% -29%
LG G4
440 Points ∼8% -80%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2773 Points ∼52% +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (min: 1923) Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1186 Points ∼31% -46%
Huawei Mate 8
945 Points ∼24% -57%
Huawei Mate S
311 Points ∼8% -86%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus (Metal)
2318 Points ∼60% +5%
OnePlus 2
938 Points ∼24% -57%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1132 Points ∼29% -49%
Google Nexus 6P
1519 Points ∼39% -31%
LG G4
513 Points ∼13% -77%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2207 Points ∼57% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (min: 1539) Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1553 Points ∼60% -22%
Huawei Mate 8
2432 Points ∼94% +21%
Huawei Mate S
1052 Points ∼41% -47%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1697 Points ∼66% -15%
OnePlus 2
1414 Points ∼55% -29%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1348 Points ∼52% -33%
Google Nexus 6P
1142 Points ∼44% -43%
LG G4
1115 Points ∼43% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (min: 2895) Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1492 Points ∼19% -51%
Huawei Mate 8
1092 Points ∼14% -64%
Huawei Mate S
315 Points ∼4% -90%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4557 Points ∼59% +51%
OnePlus 2
1854 Points ∼24% -39%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2336 Points ∼30% -23%
Google Nexus 6P
2302 Points ∼30% -24%
LG G4
1399 Points ∼18% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (min: 2421) Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1505 Points ∼31% -44%
Huawei Mate 8
1244 Points ∼26% -54%
Huawei Mate S
373 Points ∼8% -86%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3316 Points ∼68% +22%
OnePlus 2
1734 Points ∼36% -36%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2009 Points ∼41% -26%
Google Nexus 6P
1877 Points ∼39% -31%
LG G4
1324 Points ∼27% -51%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge (Android 5.0.2)
5050 Points ∼62% +8%
Huawei Mate 8
7344 Points ∼90% +58%
Huawei Mate S (Android 5.1.1 Lollipop)
4872 Points ∼60% +5%
OnePlus 2 (OxygenOS 2.0)
4282 Points ∼53% -8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
5094 Points ∼63% +9%
Google Nexus 6P
4716 Points ∼58% +1%
LG G4 (Android 5.1 Lillipop)
4579 Points ∼56% -2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
6590 Points ∼81% +41%
BaseMark OS II
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
2489 Points ∼29% +13%
Huawei Mate 8
1636 Points ∼19% -26%
Huawei Mate S
962 Points ∼11% -56%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4299 Points ∼50% +95%
OnePlus 2
2631 Points ∼31% +19%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
3137 Points ∼36% +42%
Google Nexus 6P
2424 Points ∼28% +10%
LG G4
1995 Points ∼23% -9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
4710 Points ∼55% +114%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1426 Points ∼37% -31%
Huawei Mate 8
2339 Points ∼61% +13%
Huawei Mate S
1304 Points ∼34% -37%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1124 Points ∼29% -46%
OnePlus 2
1297 Points ∼34% -37%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
876 Points ∼23% -58%
Google Nexus 6P
1136 Points ∼30% -45%
LG G4
1558 Points ∼40% -25%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2035 Points ∼53% -2%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
3989 Points ∼61% -2%
Huawei Mate 8
4064 Points ∼62% 0%
Huawei Mate S
2129 Points ∼32% -48%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3925 Points ∼60% -4%
OnePlus 2
2536 Points ∼39% -38%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2737 Points ∼42% -33%
Google Nexus 6P
1798 Points ∼27% -56%
LG G4
2368 Points ∼36% -42%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
3600 Points ∼55% -12%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1821 Points ∼55% -12%
Huawei Mate 8
2046 Points ∼62% -1%
Huawei Mate S
1222 Points ∼37% -41%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2206 Points ∼67% +6%
OnePlus 2
1681 Points ∼51% -19%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1649 Points ∼50% -20%
Google Nexus 6P
1405 Points ∼43% -32%
LG G4
1596 Points ∼49% -23%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2410 Points ∼73% +16%
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
3D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2131 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
2345 Points ∼71% +10%
Huawei Mate 8
1548 Points ∼47% -27%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1972 Points ∼59% -7%
OnePlus 2
1534 Points ∼46% -28%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1857 Points ∼56% -13%
LG G4
2179 Points ∼66% +2%
2D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6382 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
5274 Points ∼51% -17%
Huawei Mate 8
6747 Points ∼66% +6%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4818 Points ∼47% -25%
OnePlus 2
5395 Points ∼53% -15%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
5907 Points ∼58% -7%
LG G4
4850 Points ∼47% -24%
Memory Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6136 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
6924 Points ∼27% +13%
Huawei Mate 8
7338 Points ∼29% +20%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
18062 Points ∼71% +194%
OnePlus 2
6632 Points ∼26% +8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
6631 Points ∼26% +8%
LG G4
6223 Points ∼25% +1%
Disk Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
36364 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
68872 Points ∼50% +89%
Huawei Mate 8
74503 Points ∼54% +105%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
96768 Points ∼71% +166%
OnePlus 2
44133 Points ∼32% +21%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
34121 Points ∼25% -6%
LG G4
67837 Points ∼49% +87%
CPU Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
225427 Points ∼83%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
176225 Points ∼65% -22%
Huawei Mate 8
270825 Points ∼100% +20%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
47850 Points ∼18% -79%
OnePlus 2
126720 Points ∼47% -44%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
127736 Points ∼47% -43%
LG G4
103512 Points ∼38% -54%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8049 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
8438 Points ∼89% +5%
Huawei Mate 8
6990 Points ∼74% -13%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
7975 Points ∼84% -1%
OnePlus 2
6462 Points ∼68% -20%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
7332 Points ∼77% -9%
LG G4
7695 Points ∼81% -4%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
733 Points ∼39%
Huawei Mate 8
347 Points ∼19% -53%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
858 Points ∼46% +17%
OnePlus 2 (7.6 fps offscreen)
427 Points ∼23% -42%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
478 Points ∼26% -35%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.31 fps ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
9.97 fps ∼28% -25%
Huawei Mate 8
7.9 fps ∼22% -41%
OnePlus 2
15.68 fps ∼44% +18%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
14.52 fps ∼41% +9%
LG G4
8.74 fps ∼24% -34%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
22.7 fps ∼63% +71%
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points ∼70%
Huawei Mate 8
93767 Points ∼51% -27%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
133626 Points ∼72% +4%
OnePlus 2
65936 Points ∼36% -49%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
78324 Points ∼42% -39%
Google Nexus 6P
79502 Points ∼43% -38%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
131327 Points ∼71% +2%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
13 fps ∼3% -54%
Huawei Mate 8
10 fps ∼2% -64%
Huawei Mate S
3.9 fps ∼1% -86%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
28 fps ∼7% 0%
OnePlus 2
19 fps ∼5% -32%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
18 fps ∼4% -36%
Google Nexus 6P
16 fps ∼4% -43%
LG G4
10 fps ∼2% -64%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
31 fps ∼7% +11%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
6.1 fps ∼3% -59%
Huawei Mate 8
11 fps ∼6% -27%
Huawei Mate S
4.4 fps ∼3% -71%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
28 fps ∼16% +87%
OnePlus 2
19 fps ∼11% +27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
19 fps ∼11% +27%
Google Nexus 6P
9.5 fps ∼5% -37%
LG G4
5.7 fps ∼3% -62%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
15 fps ∼9% 0%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps ∼4%
Huawei Mate 8
6.2 fps ∼2% -59%
OnePlus 2
11 fps ∼3% -27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
5.8 fps ∼2% -61%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
18 fps ∼5% +20%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7.9 fps ∼7%
Huawei Mate 8
6.7 fps ∼6% -15%
OnePlus 2
11 fps ∼9% +39%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
6.1 fps ∼5% -23%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
9.4 fps ∼8% +19%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate S HiSilicon Kirin 935, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
 
OnePlus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530,
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
163 Points ∼28%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
139 Points ∼24% -15%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Stock Browser Android 5.1)
73 Points ∼13% -55%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) (Safari Mobile 9.0.1)
190 Points ∼33% +17%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 44)
80 Points ∼14% -51%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
106 Points ∼18% -35%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
116 Points ∼20% -29%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Android 5.0 Lollipop Stock-Browser)
82 Points ∼14% -50%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
108 Points ∼19% -34%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Edge 13.10586)
113 Points ∼20% -31%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
13191 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Samsung Browser 3.0)
8650 Points ∼17% -34%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
11329 Points ∼23% -14%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Stock Browser Android 5.1)
4106 Points ∼8% -69%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) (Safari Mobile 9.0.1)
15967 Points ∼32% +21%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 44)
6955 Points ∼14% -47%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
8851 Points ∼18% -33%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
8804 Points ∼18% -33%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Android 5.0 Lollipop Stock-Browser)
7832 (min: 6791) Points ∼16% -41%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996 (Qualcomm Browser)
10559 Points ∼21% -20%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996 (Chrome 44)
8395 Points ∼17% -36%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Edge 13.10586)
8059 Points ∼16% -39%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
75.12 Points ∼0%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Chrome 44)
49.193 Points ∼0% -35%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
65 Points ∼0% -13%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Stock Browser Android 5.1)
25.412 Points ∼0% -66%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) (Safari Mobile 9.0.1)
118.7 Points ∼0% +58%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 44)
44.286 Points ∼0% -41%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
48.2 Points ∼0% -36%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 Points ∼0% -37%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 44)
43.118 Points ∼0% -43%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996 (Qualcomm Browser)
64 Points ∼0% -15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996 (Chrome 44)
55 Points ∼0% -27%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Edge 13.10586)
46 Points ∼0% -39%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Samsung Browser 4.0.01-81)
2564.1 ms * ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Samsung Browser 3.0)
4037.4 ms * ∼7% -57%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
3643 ms * ∼6% -42%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Stock Browser Android 5.1)
11028.7 ms * ∼19% -330%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) (Safari Mobile 9.0.1)
1743 ms * ∼3% +32%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 44)
6585.3 ms * ∼11% -157%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
4377.1 ms * ∼7% -71%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Chrome 47)
4193 ms * ∼7% -64%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Android 5.0 Lollipop Stock-Browser)
4770.8 ms * ∼8% -86%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996 (Chrome 44)
6310 ms * ∼11% -146%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996 (Qualcomm Browser)
2460 ms * ∼4% +4%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Edge 13.10586)
5552.9 ms * ∼9% -117%
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
994 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
778 Points ∼50% -22%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1127 Points ∼73% +13%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
834 Points ∼54% -16%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1199 Points ∼78% +21%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
923 Points ∼60% -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
986 Points ∼64% -1%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
791 Points ∼51% -20%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
881 Points ∼57% -11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
985 Points ∼64% -1%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
837 Points ∼54% -16%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
50.36 MB/s ∼58%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
76.43 MB/s ∼79%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
15.79 MB/s ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
19.84 MB/s ∼13% +26%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15.74 MB/s ∼10% 0%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
17.74 MB/s ∼12% +12%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13.94 MB/s ∼9% -12%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14.53 MB/s ∼10% -8%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11.79 MB/s ∼8% -25%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 MB/s ∼10% -5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
12.9 MB/s ∼8% -18%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
86.71 MB/s ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
77.43 MB/s ∼46% -11%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.98 MB/s ∼15% -71%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
27.25 MB/s ∼16% -69%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21.87 MB/s ∼13% -75%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19.11 MB/s ∼11% -78%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20.1 MB/s ∼12% -77%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
31.5 MB/s ∼19% -64%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
101 MB/s ∼60% +16%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
145.11 MB/s ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
139.12 MB/s ∼71% -4%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
124.78 MB/s ∼64% -14%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
103.44 MB/s ∼53% -29%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
125.51 MB/s ∼64% -14%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
99.4 MB/s ∼51% -32%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
122.51 MB/s ∼63% -16%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
153 MB/s ∼78% +5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
142 MB/s ∼73% -2%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
487.34 MB/s ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
319.25 MB/s ∼43% -34%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
238.28 MB/s ∼32% -51%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
143.96 MB/s ∼20% -70%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
234.21 MB/s ∼32% -52%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
256.75 MB/s ∼35% -47%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
236.33 MB/s ∼32% -52%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
251 MB/s ∼34% -48%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
439 MB/s ∼60% -10%
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - Disk Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
36364 Points ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
68872 Points ∼50% +89%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
74503 Points ∼54% +105%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
96768 Points ∼71% +166%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44133 Points ∼32% +21%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
34121 Points ∼25% -6%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
67837 Points ∼49% +87%
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2072 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1426 Points ∼37% -31%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2339 Points ∼61% +13%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1304 Points ∼34% -37%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1124 Points ∼29% -46%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1297 Points ∼34% -37%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
876 Points ∼23% -58%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1136 Points ∼30% -45%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1558 Points ∼40% -25%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
2035 Points ∼53% -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1945 Points ∼51% -6%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high31 fps
 very low30 fps
Real Racing 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high44 fps
Temple Run 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 default60 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high56 fps
Carga Máxima
 40 °C39.8 °C37.2 °C 
 39 °C38.7 °C35.5 °C 
 37.3 °C36 °C33.6 °C 
Máximo: 40 °C
Médio: 37.5 °C
35.4 °C37.6 °C39.1 °C
34.7 °C36.7 °C35.4 °C
33.9 °C34 °C34.3 °C
Máximo: 39.1 °C
Médio: 35.7 °C
alimentação elétrica  30.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.09 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.63 / 1.1 / 1.56 Watt
Carga midlight 5.95 / 6.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, 8890 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, 7420 Octa, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption
18%
-22%
-9%
-144%
-21%
Idle Minimum *
0.63
0.5
21%
0.96
-52%
0.5
21%
2.85
-352%
0.85
-35%
Idle Average *
1.1
0.9
18%
1.35
-23%
1.9
-73%
2.95
-168%
2.07
-88%
Idle Maximum *
1.56
1.3
17%
1.4
10%
2.2
-41%
3.26
-109%
2.28
-46%
Load Average *
5.95
3.8
36%
6.11
-3%
3.2
46%
8.92
-50%
3.91
34%
Load Maximum *
6.7
6.8
-1%
9.43
-41%
6.4
4%
9.39
-40%
4.69
30%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
27h 43min
Navegar com WLAN v1.3
12h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 14min
Carga (máximo brilho)
6h 32min
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.86 Wh, 95
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
10 Wh, 92
Samsung Galaxy S7
11.55 Wh, 92.6
Huawei Mate 8
 Wh, 96
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
13 Wh, 89.8
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
10 Wh, 91.9
Motorola Moto X Force
 Wh, 91
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
13 Wh, 91
Battery Runtime
-36%
-17%
0%
-43%
-26%
-21%
-43%
Reader / Idle
1663
1349
-19%
1810
9%
1872
13%
1078
-35%
1655
0%
1610
-3%
1277
-23%
Load
392
224
-43%
242
-38%
256
-35%
179
-54%
197
-50%
330
-16%
210
-46%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
732
534
-27%
456
-38%
865
18%
369
-50%
513
-30%
426
-42%
372
-49%
H.264
914
417
-54%
892
-2%
963
5%
611
-33%
714
-22%
710
-22%
411
-55%

Pro

+ Excelente câmera
+ SoC incrivelmente veloz
+ Armazenamento expansível
+ Resistente à água e poeira (IP68)
+ Excelente tela
+ Ótima duração da bateria
+ Carga rápida e sem fio
+ Qualidade da voz
+ Bom headset incluído.
+ Adaptador OTG incluído

Contra

- Sem emissor de infravermelhos
- Sem receptor de rádio
- Live View no modo Pro nem sempre funciona bem
- Apenas micro-USB 2.0
- Sem suporte para MHL ou SlimPort
In review: Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

A Samsung desenvolveu um excelente smartphone visualmente e tecnicamente, e ele estabelece padrões. A fabricante coreana poderia ter oferecido mais em conectividade, em termos de LTE mais moderno e também, principalmente em termos de interfaces. Particularmente. A falta de um USB Type-C deve ser criticado aqui.

Fora isso, a Samsung fez quase tudo bem. A tela é a melhor que já testamos em um smartphone até este momento, e a câmera tira ótima fotos inclusive com baixa iluminação. Sobe tudo, a excepcionalmente boa duração da bateria aumenta o valor agregado sobre o do Galaxy S7 padrão. A tela com duas bordas tem um ótimo visual, mas é uma questão de gosto. Uma tela curva é pouco necessária para oferecer estes recursos adicionais.

O Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge fusiona desempenho veloz, tela brilhante, excelente câmera e boa duração da bateria em um aparelho.

A Samsung por, portanto defender sua posição no topo entre os smartphones com sua nova linha Galaxy S7. No entanto, estes modelos podem em breve ser vistos como manutenção do produto, em vez de brilhar com poder inovador.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge - 12/09/2016 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Acabamento
94%
Teclado
72 / 75 → 96%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
51 / 60 → 85%
Peso
92%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
92%
Desempenho do jogos
59 / 63 → 93%
Desempenho da aplicação
60 / 70 → 86%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
94%
Médio
82%
91%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Daniel Schmidt, 2016-04-10 (Update: 2016-04-19)