Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Gigaset GS270

Mike Wobker (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 06/03/2018

Corredor de longa distância acessível. Por um preço de 200 euros ($234), a Gigaset oferece um smartphone de nível básico equipado com uma bateria de 5000 mAh. Não deve ser uma surpresa que o GS270 consiga uma longa duração de bateria com isso. Avaliamos em nosso teste o que o comprador interessado pode esperar além disso.

bom (79%) Gigaset GS270 Mediatek MT6750ARM Mali-T860 MP2 Smartphone - 05/27/2018 - v6
Test device courtesy of Gigaset Deutschland
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
Gigaset GS270 (GS Serie)
Processador
Mediatek MT6750
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5.2 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 424 PPI, Capacitiva, IPS, Resistente a arranhões e repelente à poeira, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 12 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: 3.5mm, Card Reader: Slot microSD (compartilhado, até 128GB), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Sensores: Sensor de posição, sensor de proximidade, sensor de brilho, microUSB
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B7/​B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.95 x 149.5 x 74
Bateria
5000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Tempo de conversação 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 47 h, Tempo de conversação 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 26 h, Standby 2G (de acordo com o fabricante): 850 h, Standby 3G (de acordo com o fabricante): 700 h
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/​2.2, contrast AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1, Teclado: Virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Headset, USB charger, USB Type-A-to-MicroUSB cable, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR body: 1.356 W/kg, SAR head: 0.562, fanless
peso
160 g, Suprimento de energia: 65 g
Preço
200 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=259)
186 MBit/s ∼100% +69%
Oukitel U18
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
111 MBit/s ∼60% +1%
Gigaset GS270
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
110 MBit/s ∼59%
HTC Desire 12
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
61.06 MBit/s ∼33% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s ∼29% -51%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.5 MBit/s ∼27% -54%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=259)
182 MBit/s ∼100% +64%
Gigaset GS270
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
111 MBit/s ∼61%
Oukitel U18
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s ∼56% -8%
HTC Desire 12
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 32 GB eMMC Flash
81.83 MBit/s ∼45% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼31% -50%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.2 MBit/s ∼29% -53%
GPS Garmin Egde 520
GPS Garmin Egde 520
GPS Garmin Egde 520
GPS Garmin Egde 520
GPS Garmin Egde 520
GPS Garmin Egde 520
GPS Gigaset GS270
GPS Gigaset GS270
GPS Gigaset GS270
GPS Gigaset GS270
GPS Gigaset GS270
GPS Gigaset GS270

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
410
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 435 cd/m² Médio: 418.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 421 cd/m²
Contraste: 1581:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.4 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 8.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
89.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.9
Gigaset GS270
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Oukitel U18
LCD IPS, 1512x720, 5.85
Huawei Y6 2018
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
HTC Desire 12
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Screen
-9%
1%
12%
23%
Brightness middle
427
565
32%
483
13%
620
45%
502
18%
Brightness
418
535
28%
460
10%
612
46%
499
19%
Brightness Distribution
93
83
-11%
88
-5%
96
3%
84
-10%
Black Level *
0.27
0.55
-104%
0.4
-48%
0.57
-111%
0.2
26%
Contrast
1581
1027
-35%
1208
-24%
1088
-31%
2510
59%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.4
7.1
-11%
5.8
9%
3.46
46%
5.4
16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
14.24
13.7
4%
12.6
12%
7.88
45%
10.8
24%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.6
6.2
28%
5
42%
3.9
55%
6.2
28%
Gamma
1.9 126%
2.85 84%
2.6 92%
2.073 116%
2.07 116%
CCT
7366 88%
7153 91%
7709 84%
7230 90%
7660 85%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.42

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (25.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (41.3 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
42649 Points ∼60%
Huawei Y6 2018
39089 Points ∼55% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
60490 Points ∼85% +42%
HTC Desire 12
36253 Points ∼51% -15%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (38547 - 44842, n=15)
41877 Points ∼59% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 230642, n=350)
70775 Points ∼100% +66%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
Points ∼0%
Oukitel U18
54989 Points ∼55%
Huawei Y6 2018
46710 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
76178 Points ∼76%
HTC Desire 12
46366 Points ∼46%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (52278 - 56639, n=10)
43747 Points ∼43%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 290397, n=127)
100740 Points ∼100%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
3230 Points ∼66%
Oukitel U18
3358 Points ∼68% +4%
Huawei Y6 2018
3629 Points ∼74% +12%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4905 Points ∼100% +52%
HTC Desire 12
3320 Points ∼68% +3%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3257 - 3394, n=17)
2829 Points ∼58% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (2814 - 8601, n=214)
4398 Points ∼90% +36%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
4287 Points ∼74%
Oukitel U18
4532 Points ∼78% +6%
Huawei Y6 2018
4756 Points ∼82% +11%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
5801 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (4190 - 4532, n=13)
3614 Points ∼62% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (5960 - 10264, n=378)
4665 Points ∼80% +9%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
10 Points ∼1%
Oukitel U18
698 Points ∼97% +6880%
Huawei Y6 2018
616 Points ∼85% +6060%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
722 Points ∼100% +7120%
HTC Desire 12
591 Points ∼82% +5810%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9 - 1137, n=17)
457 Points ∼63% +4470%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=453)
666 Points ∼92% +6560%
Graphics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
639 Points ∼42%
Oukitel U18
640 Points ∼42% 0%
Huawei Y6 2018
443 Points ∼29% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1017 Points ∼67% +59%
HTC Desire 12
18 Points ∼1% -97%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (471 - 649, n=17)
587 Points ∼39% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=453)
1510 Points ∼100% +136%
Memory (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
834 Points ∼74%
Oukitel U18
798 Points ∼71% -4%
Huawei Y6 2018
1069 Points ∼95% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
961 Points ∼85% +15%
HTC Desire 12
984 Points ∼88% +18%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (623 - 1288, n=17)
849 Points ∼76% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=453)
1124 Points ∼100% +35%
System (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
1837 Points ∼57%
Oukitel U18
1838 Points ∼57% 0%
Huawei Y6 2018
1043 Points ∼32% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3236 Points ∼100% +76%
HTC Desire 12
1526 Points ∼47% -17%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1259 - 2003, n=17)
1811 Points ∼56% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=453)
2257 Points ∼70% +23%
Overall (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
312 Points ∼25%
Oukitel U18
899 Points ∼73% +188%
Huawei Y6 2018
743 Points ∼60% +138%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1229 Points ∼100% +294%
HTC Desire 12
637 Points ∼52% +104%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (298 - 965, n=17)
676 Points ∼55% +117%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 4308, n=457)
1131 Points ∼92% +263%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
1718 Points ∼45%
Huawei Y6 2018
1419 Points ∼37% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3316 Points ∼86% +93%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1393 - 1935, n=14)
1702 Points ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14417, n=153)
3853 Points ∼100% +124%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
2623 Points ∼61%
Oukitel U18
2617 Points ∼61% 0%
Huawei Y6 2018
1939 Points ∼45% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4292 Points ∼100% +64%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1790 - 2765, n=16)
2504 Points ∼58% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 10558, n=200)
3952 Points ∼92% +51%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
615 Points ∼53%
Oukitel U18
608 Points ∼52% -1%
Huawei Y6 2018
692 Points ∼60% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
870 Points ∼75% +41%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (590 - 682, n=16)
616 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4265, n=201)
1159 Points ∼100% +88%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
1111 Points ∼55%
Oukitel U18
1195 Points ∼59% +8%
Huawei Y6 2018
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2038 Points ∼100% +83%
HTC Desire 12
589 Points ∼29% -47%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (710 - 1233, n=17)
1104 Points ∼54% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (500 - 3669, n=303)
1544 Points ∼76% +39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
324 Points ∼31%
Oukitel U18
329 Points ∼31% +2%
Huawei Y6 2018
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
379 Points ∼36% +17%
HTC Desire 12
92 Points ∼9% -72%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (90 - 329, n=17)
280 Points ∼27% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 5220, n=303)
1049 Points ∼100% +224%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
385 Points ∼38%
Oukitel U18
393 Points ∼39% +2%
Huawei Y6 2018
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
463 Points ∼46% +20%
HTC Desire 12
113 Points ∼11% -71%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (113 - 393, n=17)
334 Points ∼33% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (87 - 4734, n=311)
1006 Points ∼100% +161%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
1122 Points ∼55%
Oukitel U18
1219 Points ∼59% +9%
Huawei Y6 2018
907 Points ∼44% -19%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2058 Points ∼100% +83%
HTC Desire 12
593 Points ∼29% -47%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (718 - 1219, n=17)
1080 Points ∼52% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (474 - 3642, n=334)
1449 Points ∼70% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
478 Points ∼34%
Oukitel U18
484 Points ∼34% +1%
Huawei Y6 2018
55 Points ∼4% -88%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
732 Points ∼51% +53%
HTC Desire 12
148 Points ∼10% -69%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (109 - 484, n=17)
407 Points ∼29% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (107 - 8312, n=334)
1423 Points ∼100% +198%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
548 Points ∼45%
Oukitel U18
559 Points ∼46% +2%
Huawei Y6 2018
70 Points ∼6% -87%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
854 Points ∼70% +56%
HTC Desire 12
178 Points ∼15% -68%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (136 - 559, n=17)
468 Points ∼38% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (120 - 6378, n=342)
1223 Points ∼100% +123%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
8329 Points ∼53%
Oukitel U18
10143 Points ∼65% +22%
Huawei Y6 2018
10344 Points ∼66% +24%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
15593 Points ∼100% +87%
HTC Desire 12
9856 Points ∼63% +18%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9934 - 10553, n=17)
8835 Points ∼57% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (8065 - 36762, n=489)
12157 Points ∼78% +46%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
10010 Points ∼64%
Oukitel U18
10100 Points ∼65% +1%
Huawei Y6 2018
5426 Points ∼35% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13219 Points ∼85% +32%
HTC Desire 12
3597 Points ∼23% -64%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9476 - 10361, n=17)
8617 Points ∼55% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 113380, n=489)
15596 Points ∼100% +56%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
9580 Points ∼70%
Oukitel U18
10117 Points ∼74% +6%
Huawei Y6 2018
6067 Points ∼44% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13682 Points ∼100% +43%
HTC Desire 12
4188 Points ∼31% -56%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (9574 - 10269, n=17)
8677 Points ∼63% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 64405, n=490)
13491 Points ∼99% +41%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oukitel U18
17 fps ∼62%
Huawei Y6 2018
7.7 fps ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
23 fps ∼84%
HTC Desire 12
5.9 fps ∼22%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 17, n=14)
15.1 fps ∼55%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 177, n=517)
27.4 fps ∼100%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oukitel U18
25 fps ∼100%
Huawei Y6 2018
14 fps ∼56%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
17 fps ∼68%
HTC Desire 12
9.7 fps ∼39%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 25, n=14)
20.2 fps ∼81%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=520)
23.6 fps ∼94%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
6.8 fps ∼47%
Oukitel U18
6.8 fps ∼47% 0%
Huawei Y6 2018
2.8 fps ∼19% -59%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.9 fps ∼68% +46%
HTC Desire 12
2.7 fps ∼19% -60%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.3 - 7.1, n=15)
6.28 fps ∼43% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 88.2, n=440)
14.5 fps ∼100% +113%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
6.8 fps ∼47%
Oukitel U18
13 fps ∼89% +91%
Huawei Y6 2018
5.9 fps ∼40% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.4 fps ∼64% +38%
HTC Desire 12
5.4 fps ∼37% -21%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.6 - 13, n=15)
9.73 fps ∼67% +43%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=442)
14.6 fps ∼100% +115%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
4.6 fps ∼37%
Oukitel U18
4.6 fps ∼37% 0%
Huawei Y6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.5 fps ∼52% +41%
HTC Desire 12
1.6 fps ∼13% -65%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.5 - 4.7, n=15)
4.19 fps ∼34% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 60, n=304)
12.5 fps ∼100% +172%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
4.5 fps ∼36%
Oukitel U18
10 fps ∼79% +122%
Huawei Y6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.2 fps ∼49% +38%
HTC Desire 12
3.5 fps ∼28% -22%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.8 - 10, n=15)
7.23 fps ∼57% +61%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=306)
12.6 fps ∼100% +180%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
2.4 fps ∼28%
Oukitel U18
2.4 fps ∼28% 0%
Huawei Y6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.5 fps ∼41% +46%
HTC Desire 12
0.91 fps ∼11% -62%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (1.9 - 2.5, n=16)
2.25 fps ∼26% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 35, n=236)
8.57 fps ∼100% +257%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Gigaset GS270
2.4 fps ∼31%
Oukitel U18
2.4 fps ∼31% 0%
Huawei Y6 2018
fps ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.4 fps ∼43% +42%
HTC Desire 12
1.5 fps ∼19% -37%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (2.3 - 4.9, n=16)
3.44 fps ∼44% +43%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 50, n=239)
7.84 fps ∼100% +227%

Legend

 
Gigaset GS270 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel U18 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC Desire 12 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 224, n=372)
33.4 Points ∼100% +81%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
23.097 Points ∼69% +25%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (16.6 - 20.8, n=17)
18.8 Points ∼56% +2%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
18.55 Points ∼56% 0%
Gigaset GS270
18.475 Points ∼55%
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)
18.33 Points ∼55% -1%
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
15.791 Points ∼47% -15%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=508)
4996 Points ∼100% +57%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
4424 Points ∼89% +39%
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)
3377 Points ∼68% +6%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (2712 - 3506, n=17)
3197 Points ∼64% +1%
Gigaset GS270
3175 Points ∼64%
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
2930 Points ∼59% -8%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
2582 Points ∼52% -19%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
17134 ms * ∼100% -21%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
16192.4 ms * ∼95% -15%
Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65)
14565.8 ms * ∼85% -3%
Gigaset GS270
14103.2 ms * ∼82%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (11708 - 22627, n=17)
13987 ms * ∼82% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=527)
11914 ms * ∼70% +16%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
10895 ms * ∼64% +23%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
112 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=249)
99.9 Points ∼89%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
71 Points ∼63%
Average Mediatek MT6750 (34 - 78, n=5)
61 Points ∼54%

* ... smaller is better

Gigaset GS270Oukitel U18Huawei Y6 2018Xiaomi Redmi 5 PlusHTC Desire 12Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
20%
9%
74%
7%
-32%
4%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
58.9
47.02 (Tosh-iba Exceria Pro M401)
-20%
64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
59.46
1%
61.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
37.1 (6.38 - 65.4, n=106)
-37%
43.9 (3.4 - 87.1, n=284)
-25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.8
71.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-6%
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
84.38
11%
81.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
55.4 (10.8 - 87.7, n=106)
-27%
62.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=284)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
10.95
12.96
18%
9
-18%
7.1
-35%
7.54
-31%
7.3 (0.49 - 37.9, n=221)
-33%
13.6 (0.14 - 164, n=566)
24%
Random Read 4KB
34.64
28.7
-17%
38.8
12%
79.5
130%
16.69
-52%
19.8 (2.49 - 61.7, n=221)
-43%
34.9 (1.59 - 173, n=566)
1%
Sequential Write 256KB
44.86
109.2
143%
65.6
46%
194.5
334%
103.77
131%
41.1 (8.74 - 97.6, n=221)
-8%
73.2 (2.99 - 228, n=566)
63%
Sequential Read 256KB
269.01
273.1
2%
254.3
-5%
270
0%
211.38
-21%
157 (9.66 - 294, n=221)
-42%
214 (12.1 - 832, n=566)
-20%
Carga Máxima
 38.3 °C24.5 °C38.3 °C 
 38.4 °C34.9 °C40.1 °C 
 38.1 °C34.8 °C38.1 °C 
Máximo: 40.1 °C
Médio: 36.2 °C
33.2 °C35.5 °C38.4 °C
33.1 °C35.5 °C38.5 °C
34 °C35.1 °C37.1 °C
Máximo: 38.5 °C
Médio: 35.6 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.736.52533.939.43138.8374044.740.55048.137.26327.134.88025.531.410024.128.812520.828.116020.130.320020.633.825018.936.631518.240.940017.647.150016.749.86301655.980015.560.9100015.165125015.263.8160014.962.3200014.762250014.862315014.762.4400014.761.3500014.861.2630014.961.9800014.865.81000014.966.21250014.860.31600014.854SPL58.527.974.4N12132.8median 15.1Gigaset GS270median 60.9Delta2.29.335.243.332.945.137.234.331.74039.640.328.331.827.333.826.929.226.731.92427.920.928.220.939.819.534.418.54817.56117.563.815.769.415.87316.672.515.871.615.47115.567.21668.615.874.41680.316.38216.376.116.269.716.464.416.451.328.6871.163.6median 16.4HTC Desire 12median 67.22.113.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigaset GS270 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

HTC Desire 12 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.5 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.6 / 2 Watt
Carga midlight 3.7 / 5.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigaset GS270
5000 mAh
Oukitel U18
4000 mAh
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
HTC Desire 12
2730 mAh
Average Mediatek MT6750
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-83%
-58%
-35%
-10%
-30%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
1.12
-40%
1.7
-113%
0.7
12%
1.13
-41%
1.163 (0.57 - 2.3, n=17)
-45%
0.872 (0.2 - 3.4, n=587)
-9%
Idle Average *
1.6
2.27
-42%
2.5
-56%
2.8
-75%
2.03
-27%
2.05 (1.42 - 3.5, n=17)
-28%
1.703 (0.6 - 6.2, n=586)
-6%
Idle Maximum *
2
2.49
-25%
3.2
-60%
3.4
-70%
2.05
-3%
2.46 (1.47 - 5.9, n=17)
-23%
1.968 (0.74 - 6.6, n=587)
2%
Load Average *
3.7
10.75
-191%
5.2
-41%
4.2
-14%
3.68
1%
5.18 (3.24 - 10.8, n=17)
-40%
3.99 (0.8 - 10.8, n=581)
-8%
Load Maximum *
5.7
12.39
-117%
6.8
-19%
7.2
-26%
4.52
21%
6.45 (3.3 - 12.4, n=17)
-13%
5.63 (1.2 - 14.2, n=581)
1%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 15min
Gigaset GS270
5000 mAh
Oukitel U18
4000 mAh
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
HTC Desire 12
2730 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
735
639
-13%
643
-13%
497
-32%
440
-40%

Pro

+ Longa duração da bateria
+ Boa razão de contraste
+ Acabamento sólido

Contra

- Câmera medíocre
- Baixo brilho da tela
- Alto falante ruim
Testing the Gigaset GS270. Test unit provided by Gigaset Germany.
Testing the Gigaset GS270. Test unit provided by Gigaset Germany.

Em nosso teste, o Gigaset GS270 apresenta-se como um smartphone de gama média inferior que não apresenta muitas fraquezas importantes. O desempenho oferecido está no nível esperado do hardware integrado e, além da versão ligeiramente antiga do Android, quase não há motivo para reclamações. Embora muitos dispositivos concorrentes ofereçam melhores resultados em algumas áreas, eles apresentam problemas em outras. 

Os compradores da GS270 obtêm exatamente o que a Gigaset prometeu: um smartphone Android por 200 Euros (~$234) com uma bateria de longa duração e um sistema fluente para o uso diário.

A um preço de cerca de 200 euros (~234), os compradores interessados devem pensar sobre os recursos de um smartphone que são importantes para eles. Qualquer pessoa que tire fotos apenas ocasionalmente e não precise rodar programas exigentes, terá um dispositivo sólido com o Gigaset GS270, que é adequado para fazer chamadas telefônicas e pode lidar com todos os aplicativos usuais. Além disso, ultrapassa a maioria dos concorrentes com sua longa duração de bateria.

Gigaset GS270 - 05/27/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
80%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
83%
Conectividade
37 / 60 → 62%
Peso
91%
Bateria
95%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
20 / 63 → 32%
Desempenho da aplicação
36 / 70 → 51%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
51 / 91 → 56%
Camera
65%
Médio
66%
79%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Gigaset GS270
Mike Wobker, 2018-06- 3 (Update: 2018-06-17)