Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Gigaset GS270
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Gigaset GS270 | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| HTC Desire 12 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| Gigaset GS270 | |
| HTC Desire 12 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 421 cd/m²
Contraste: 1581:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 8.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
89.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 1.9
| Gigaset GS270 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20 | Oukitel U18 LCD IPS, 1512x720, 5.85 | Huawei Y6 2018 IPS, 1440x720, 5.70 | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99 | HTC Desire 12 IPS, 1440x720, 5.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -9% | 1% | 12% | 23% | |
| Brightness middle | 427 | 565 32% | 483 13% | 620 45% | 502 18% |
| Brightness | 418 | 535 28% | 460 10% | 612 46% | 499 19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 83 -11% | 88 -5% | 96 3% | 84 -10% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.55 -104% | 0.4 -48% | 0.57 -111% | 0.2 26% |
| Contrast | 1581 | 1027 -35% | 1208 -24% | 1088 -31% | 2510 59% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 7.1 -11% | 5.8 9% | 3.46 46% | 5.4 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.24 | 13.7 4% | 12.6 12% | 7.88 45% | 10.8 24% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.6 | 6.2 28% | 5 42% | 3.9 55% | 6.2 28% |
| Gamma | 1.9 116% | 2.85 77% | 2.6 85% | 2.073 106% | 2.07 106% |
| CCT | 7366 88% | 7153 91% | 7709 84% | 7230 90% | 7660 85% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.42 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset GS270 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| HTC Desire 12 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (38547 - 44842, n=17) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset GS270 | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| HTC Desire 12 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (52278 - 56639, n=10) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| HTC Desire 12 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 25, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| HTC Desire 12 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 17, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset GS270 | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| HTC Desire 12 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.6 - 13, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset GS270 | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| HTC Desire 12 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (5.3 - 7.1, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset GS270 | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| HTC Desire 12 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.8 - 10, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Gigaset GS270 | |
| Oukitel U18 | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| HTC Desire 12 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (3.5 - 4.7, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Gigaset GS270 | |
| Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (12 - 20.8, n=19) | |
| HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=212, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65) | |
| Gigaset GS270 | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (1994 - 3506, n=19) | |
| HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| HTC Desire 12 (Chrome 66.0.3359.158) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Oukitel U18 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (11708 - 22627, n=19) | |
| Gigaset GS270 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Mediatek MT6750 (34 - 78, n=5) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Gigaset GS270 | Oukitel U18 | Huawei Y6 2018 | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | HTC Desire 12 | Average 16 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 20% | 9% | 74% | 7% | -27% | 1456% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 269 | 273.1 2% | 254.3 -5% | 270 0% | 211.4 -21% | 164.5 ? -39% | 1502 ? 458% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 44.86 | 109.2 143% | 65.6 46% | 194.5 334% | 103.8 131% | 43 ? -4% | 1111 ? 2377% |
| Random Read 4KB | 34.64 | 28.7 -17% | 38.8 12% | 79.5 130% | 16.69 -52% | 21.7 ? -37% | 247 ? 613% |
| Random Write 4KB | 10.95 | 12.96 18% | 9 -18% | 7.1 -35% | 7.54 -31% | 8.08 ? -26% | 271 ? 2375% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 75.8 | 71.5 ? -6% | 84.9 ? 12% | 84.4 11% | 81.8 ? 8% | 59.1 ? -22% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 58.9 | 47.02 ? -20% | 64 ? 9% | 59.5 1% | 61.1 ? 4% | 39.8 ? -32% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Gigaset GS270 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HTC Desire 12 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.3 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso |  0.8 / 1.6 / 2 Watt |
| Carga |
3.7 / 5.7 Watt |
    
| |
| Gigaset GS270 5000 mAh | Oukitel U18 4000 mAh | Huawei Y6 2018 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh | HTC Desire 12 2730 mAh | Average Mediatek MT6750 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -83% | -58% | -35% | -10% | -29% | -16% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.8 | 1.12 -40% | 1.7 -113% | 0.7 12% | 1.13 -41% | 1.13 ? -41% | 0.897 ? -12% |
| Idle Average * | 1.6 | 2.27 -42% | 2.5 -56% | 2.8 -75% | 2.03 -27% | 2.02 ? -26% | 1.452 ? 9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2 | 2.49 -25% | 3.2 -60% | 3.4 -70% | 2.05 -3% | 2.42 ? -21% | 1.629 ? 19% |
| Load Average * | 3.7 | 10.75 -191% | 5.2 -41% | 4.2 -14% | 3.68 1% | 5.21 ? -41% | 5.55 ? -50% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.7 | 12.39 -117% | 6.8 -19% | 7.2 -26% | 4.52 21% | 6.56 ? -15% | 8.31 ? -46% |
* ... smaller is better
| Gigaset GS270 5000 mAh | Oukitel U18 4000 mAh | Huawei Y6 2018 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh | HTC Desire 12 2730 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 735 | 639 -13% | 643 -13% | 497 -32% | 440 -40% |
Pro
Contra
Em nosso teste, o Gigaset GS270 apresenta-se como um smartphone de gama média inferior que não apresenta muitas fraquezas importantes. O desempenho oferecido está no nível esperado do hardware integrado e, além da versão ligeiramente antiga do Android, quase não há motivo para reclamações. Embora muitos dispositivos concorrentes ofereçam melhores resultados em algumas áreas, eles apresentam problemas em outras.
Os compradores da GS270 obtêm exatamente o que a Gigaset prometeu: um smartphone Android por 200 Euros (~$234) com uma bateria de longa duração e um sistema fluente para o uso diário.
A um preço de cerca de 200 euros (~234), os compradores interessados devem pensar sobre os recursos de um smartphone que são importantes para eles. Qualquer pessoa que tire fotos apenas ocasionalmente e não precise rodar programas exigentes, terá um dispositivo sólido com o Gigaset GS270, que é adequado para fazer chamadas telefônicas e pode lidar com todos os aplicativos usuais. Além disso, ultrapassa a maioria dos concorrentes com sua longa duração de bateria.
Gigaset GS270
-
05/27/2018 v6(old)
Mike Wobker