Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y6 2018

Florian Wimmer, 05/23/2018

Ainda acessível. O Huawei Y6 2018 é um dispositivo que tem muito poder pelo valor. O dispositivo tem um visual moderno e tem uma tela decente, mas será que pode ser proclamado como o rei dos dispositivos de orçamento?

Huawei Y6 2018 (Y Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 308
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
5.7 polegadas 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixel 282 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Cartão microSD de até 256 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Sensor de Proximidade, Sensor de posição, USB-OTG
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.8 x 152.4 x 73
Bateria
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix Contrast Auto Focus (AF), LED flash, Vídeos de até 1080p/30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix LED flash
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono no lado inferior do dispositivo, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, SIM Tool, HiCare, Game Suite, Phone Clone, App Gallery, Tips, Themes, 24 Meses Garantia, Bandwidth Download/Upload: 150 Mbps/50 Mbps LTE; SAR values: 0.31 W/kg Head, 0.5 W/kg Body, fanless
peso
150 g, Suprimento de energia: 50 g
Preço
149 Euro

 

Huawei Y6 2018
Huawei Y6 2018
Huawei Y6 2018
Huawei Y6 2018
Huawei Y6 2018
Huawei Y6 2018
Huawei Y6 2018

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris VS
Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼100% +454%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.7 - 939, n=211)
201 MBit/s ∼72% +298%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼43% +140%
Nokia 2
Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 MBit/s ∼20% +10%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
50.5 MBit/s ∼18%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
43.6 MBit/s ∼16% -14%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris VS
Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
230 MBit/s ∼100% +341%
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.8 - 703, n=211)
194 MBit/s ∼84% +272%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
111 MBit/s ∼48% +113%
Nokia 2
Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash
54.2 MBit/s ∼24% +4%
Huawei Y6 2018
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
52.2 MBit/s ∼23%
Huawei Y6 2017
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 16 GB eMMC Flash
48.7 MBit/s ∼21% -7%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – wooded areas
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – wooded areas
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – bridge
GPS Huawei Y6 2018 – overview
GPS Huawei Y6 2018 – overview
GPS Huawei Y6 2018 – wooded areas
GPS Huawei Y6 2018 – wooded areas
GPS Huawei Y6 2018 – bridge
GPS Huawei Y6 2018 – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker: The target colour is in the bottom half of each area.
ColorChecker: The target colour is in the bottom half of each area.
Photograph of our test chart.
Photograph of our test chart.
Test chart in detail.
Test chart in detail.
442
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
483
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
465
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 492 cd/m² Médio: 459.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4.2 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 444 cd/m²
Contraste: 1208:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 4.42
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
93.9% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.6
Huawei Y6 2018
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Nokia 2
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Motorola Moto G5s
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
BQ Aquaris VS
IPS, 1280x720, 5.2
Huawei Y6 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Screen
-8%
6%
-1%
37%
Brightness middle
483
527
9%
490
1%
535
11%
438
-9%
Brightness
460
503
9%
502
9%
544
18%
432
-6%
Brightness Distribution
88
91
3%
92
5%
88
0%
90
2%
Black Level *
0.4
0.68
-70%
0.43
-8%
0.61
-53%
0.13
67%
Contrast
1208
775
-36%
1140
-6%
877
-27%
3369
179%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.8
5.3
9%
5.7
2%
5.3
9%
4.8
17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.6
9.2
27%
7.8
38%
11.1
12%
11.4
10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.42
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5
5.8
-16%
4.7
6%
4
20%
3.2
36%
Gamma
2.6 92%
2.12 113%
2.4 100%
1.95 123%
2.23 108%
CCT
7709 84%
7894 82%
7526 86%
6800 96%
7090 92%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 10415 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.8 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 9.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.7 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
39089 Points ∼55%
Nokia 2
24924 Points ∼35% -36%
Motorola Moto G5s
46370 Points ∼65% +19%
BQ Aquaris VS
44022 Points ∼62% +13%
Huawei Y6 2017
40981 Points ∼57% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (30924 - 39089, n=7)
36343 Points ∼51% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (23540 - 230421, n=307)
71466 Points ∼100% +83%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
46710 Points ∼41%
BQ Aquaris VS
56906 Points ∼50% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (32557 - 46710, n=3)
41453 Points ∼36% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (21088 - 266981, n=81)
114287 Points ∼100% +145%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
3629 Points ∼80%
Nokia 2
2304 Points ∼51% -37%
Motorola Moto G5s
3604 Points ∼80% -1%
BQ Aquaris VS
3648 Points ∼81% +1%
Huawei Y6 2017
3487 Points ∼77% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2986 - 3629, n=7)
3326 Points ∼74% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (4673 - 8601, n=170)
4525 Points ∼100% +25%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
4756 Points ∼100%
Nokia 2
3109 Points ∼65% -35%
Motorola Moto G5s
4669 Points ∼98% -2%
BQ Aquaris VS
4751 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei Y6 2017
4607 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3961 - 4813, n=7)
4524 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 10264, n=335)
4698 Points ∼99% -1%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
616 Points ∼84%
Nokia 2
9 Points ∼1% -99%
Motorola Moto G5s
703 Points ∼96% +14%
BQ Aquaris VS
680 Points ∼93% +10%
Huawei Y6 2017
734 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (616 - 802, n=7)
705 Points ∼96% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=410)
673 Points ∼92% +9%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
443 Points ∼29%
Nokia 2
251 Points ∼16% -43%
Motorola Moto G5s
723 Points ∼47% +63%
BQ Aquaris VS
786 Points ∼51% +77%
Huawei Y6 2017
386 Points ∼25% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (436 - 447, n=7)
440 Points ∼29% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=410)
1530 Points ∼100% +245%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
1069 Points ∼83%
Nokia 2
233 Points ∼18% -78%
Motorola Moto G5s
656 Points ∼51% -39%
BQ Aquaris VS
773 Points ∼60% -28%
Huawei Y6 2017
1288 Points ∼100% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (617 - 1372, n=7)
846 Points ∼66% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4423, n=410)
1115 Points ∼87% +4%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
1043 Points ∼47%
Nokia 2
901 Points ∼41% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s
1553 Points ∼70% +49%
BQ Aquaris VS
1544 Points ∼70% +48%
Huawei Y6 2017
1354 Points ∼61% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1043 - 1477, n=7)
1285 Points ∼58% +23%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=410)
2214 Points ∼100% +112%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
743 Points ∼66%
Nokia 2
149 Points ∼13% -80%
Motorola Moto G5s
848 Points ∼75% +14%
BQ Aquaris VS
894 Points ∼79% +20%
Huawei Y6 2017
839 Points ∼74% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (371 - 891, n=7)
713 Points ∼63% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=413)
1131 Points ∼100% +52%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
1419 Points ∼35%
Motorola Moto G5s
1871 Points ∼47% +32%
BQ Aquaris VS
1808 Points ∼45% +27%
Huawei Y6 2017
1238 Points ∼31% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1203 - 1460, n=5)
1361 Points ∼34% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (773 - 14362, n=108)
3998 Points ∼100% +182%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
1939 Points ∼47%
Nokia 2
1118 Points ∼27% -42%
Motorola Moto G5s
2270 Points ∼55% +17%
BQ Aquaris VS
2400 Points ∼58% +24%
Huawei Y6 2017
1903 Points ∼46% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1737 - 1939, n=7)
1868 Points ∼46% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 10558, n=152)
4105 Points ∼100% +112%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
692 Points ∼56%
Nokia 2
423 Points ∼34% -39%
Motorola Moto G5s
630 Points ∼51% -9%
BQ Aquaris VS
657 Points ∼53% -5%
Huawei Y6 2017
680 Points ∼55% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (642 - 692, n=7)
673 Points ∼55% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4265, n=153)
1231 Points ∼100% +78%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
907 Points ∼63%
Nokia 2
539 Points ∼37% -41%
Motorola Moto G5s
1158 Points ∼80% +28%
BQ Aquaris VS
1145 Points ∼79% +26%
Huawei Y6 2017
967 Points ∼67% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (622 - 907, n=7)
849 Points ∼59% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (581 - 3642, n=290)
1448 Points ∼100% +60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
55 Points ∼4%
Nokia 2
120 Points ∼8% +118%
Motorola Moto G5s
483 Points ∼33% +778%
BQ Aquaris VS
533 Points ∼37% +869%
Huawei Y6 2017
221 Points ∼15% +302%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (31 - 55, n=7)
44.3 Points ∼3% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (54 - 8252, n=290)
1460 Points ∼100% +2555%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
70 Points ∼6%
Nokia 2
120 Points ∼10% +71%
Motorola Moto G5s
555 Points ∼45% +693%
BQ Aquaris VS
605 Points ∼49% +764%
Huawei Y6 2017
267 Points ∼21% +281%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (39 - 70, n=7)
56.1 Points ∼4% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 6378, n=298)
1247 Points ∼100% +1681%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
10344 Points ∼86%
Nokia 2
7150 Points ∼59% -31%
Motorola Moto G5s
9045 Points ∼75% -13%
BQ Aquaris VS
9067 Points ∼75% -12%
Huawei Y6 2017
11088 Points ∼92% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (6656 - 10496, n=7)
9897 Points ∼82% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (7733 - 36494, n=443)
12098 Points ∼100% +17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
5426 Points ∼35%
Nokia 2
4150 Points ∼27% -24%
Motorola Moto G5s
9626 Points ∼62% +77%
BQ Aquaris VS
10271 Points ∼66% +89%
Huawei Y6 2017
6184 Points ∼40% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2546 - 5528, n=7)
5056 Points ∼32% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=443)
15622 Points ∼100% +188%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
6067 Points ∼45%
Nokia 2
4577 Points ∼34% -25%
Motorola Moto G5s
9491 Points ∼71% +56%
BQ Aquaris VS
9977 Points ∼74% +64%
Huawei Y6 2017
6858 Points ∼51% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2951 - 6175, n=7)
5668 Points ∼42% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=444)
13452 Points ∼100% +122%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
7.7 fps ∼29%
Nokia 2
5.4 fps ∼20% -30%
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps ∼59% +108%
BQ Aquaris VS
18 fps ∼67% +134%
Huawei Y6 2017
11 fps ∼41% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.4 - 7.8, n=7)
7.07 fps ∼26% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (4.2 - 177, n=469)
27 fps ∼100% +251%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
14 fps ∼60%
Nokia 2
9.6 fps ∼41% -31%
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps ∼68% +14%
BQ Aquaris VS
21 fps ∼90% +50%
Huawei Y6 2017
17 fps ∼73% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (6.4 - 14, n=7)
12.5 fps ∼53% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (7.5 - 120, n=472)
23.4 fps ∼100% +67%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
2.8 fps ∼19%
Nokia 2
1.6 fps ∼11% -43%
Motorola Moto G5s
7.1 fps ∼49% +154%
BQ Aquaris VS
7.7 fps ∼53% +175%
Huawei Y6 2017
3.9 fps ∼27% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (1.3 - 2.8, n=7)
2.57 fps ∼18% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=394)
14.4 fps ∼100% +414%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 2018
5.9 fps ∼39%
Nokia 2
4.4 fps ∼29% -25%
Motorola Moto G5s
7.4 fps ∼49% +25%
BQ Aquaris VS
15 fps ∼100% +154%
Huawei Y6 2017
8.1 fps ∼54% +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (3.7 - 6.4, n=7)
5.54 fps ∼37% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=396)
14.5 fps ∼97% +146%

Legend

 
Huawei Y6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris VS Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Y6 2017 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 224, n=327)
34.7 Points ∼100% +87%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
18.661 Points ∼54% +1%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
18.55 Points ∼53%
BQ Aquaris VS (Chrome 65)
18.125 Points ∼52% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (15.9 - 18.6, n=6)
17.7 Points ∼51% -5%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
17.643 Points ∼51% -5%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
11.607 Points ∼33% -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=463)
5019 Points ∼100% +94%
BQ Aquaris VS (Chrome 65)
3296 Points ∼66% +28%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
3092 Points ∼62% +20%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
3035 Points ∼60% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (2582 - 3084, n=7)
2888 Points ∼58% +12%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
2582 Points ∼51%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
1948 Points ∼39% -25%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)
19274.5 ms * ∼100% -19%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
16192.4 ms * ∼84%
BQ Aquaris VS (Chrome 65)
13612 ms * ∼71% +16%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
13057 ms * ∼68% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (10742 - 16192, n=7)
12897 ms * ∼67% +20%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
12254.8 ms * ∼64% +24%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=482)
11875 ms * ∼62% +27%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=230)
97.9 Points ∼100% +38%
Huawei Y6 2018 (Chrome 66)
71 Points ∼73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (62 - 79, n=5)
68.6 Points ∼70% -3%
Huawei Y6 2017 (Chrome 60)
65 Points ∼66% -8%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
61 Points ∼62% -14%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei Y6 2018Nokia 2Motorola Moto G5sBQ Aquaris VSHuawei Y6 2017Average 16 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-24%
72%
28%
-4%
-39%
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
62.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
59.41 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
26.4
-59%
35.4 (8.29 - 64.3, n=91)
-45%
42.7 (8.29 - 87.1, n=240)
-33%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
84.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
83.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
48.4
-43%
54.2 (13.5 - 87.7, n=91)
-36%
61 (13.5 - 96.5, n=240)
-28%
Random Write 4KB
9
8.1
-10%
46.2
413%
6.4
-29%
20.54
128%
7.07 (0.49 - 37.9, n=206)
-21%
13.2 (0.14 - 164, n=516)
47%
Random Read 4KB
38.8
17.44
-55%
40.6
5%
47.2
22%
25.93
-33%
18.9 (2.49 - 61.7, n=206)
-51%
33.6 (1.59 - 173, n=516)
-13%
Sequential Write 256KB
65.6
50.77
-23%
77.5
18%
185.9
183%
66.88
2%
40 (8.74 - 97.6, n=206)
-39%
69 (2.99 - 216, n=516)
5%
Sequential Read 256KB
254.3
131.15
-48%
259
2%
254.4
0%
202.55
-20%
152 (9.66 - 284, n=206)
-40%
207 (12.1 - 832, n=516)
-19%
Shadow Fight 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high39 fps
 minimal41.5 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min31 fps
 high HD30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 35.6 °C31.6 °C30.5 °C 
 35.8 °C31.2 °C31.5 °C 
 33.8 °C31.1 °C32.6 °C 
Máximo: 35.8 °C
Médio: 32.6 °C
28.8 °C29.7 °C33 °C
29 °C29.8 °C31.4 °C
28.9 °C30 °C31.3 °C
Máximo: 33 °C
Médio: 30.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  38.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.336.22535.645.23131.341.94037.232.8503835.6632825.78026.525.710024.624.112522.523.61602131.520020.243.825019.648.331518.352.440017.157.250016.75963016.260.980016.262.5100015.467.1125015.269.5160015.272.220001573.125001574.1315015.375.5400015.374.4500015.273.8630015.272800015.372.31000015.471.31250015.258.81600015.241.6SPL27.884.2N155.7median 15.4Huawei Y6 2018median 62.5Delta1.813.229.629.929.627.928.927.928.83028.836.647.836.630.534.230.525.726.325.724.528.524.528.131.728.138.536.238.530.423.430.436.121.736.14020.74043.919.643.947.52147.553.820.253.859.818.759.864.718.864.765.717.665.767.117.667.169.516.869.570.116.370.172.816.472.873.916.173.975.916.275.973.81673.870.315.970.370.216.170.273.61673.668.815.868.853.815.953.883.429.983.452.11.452.1median 65.7Huawei Y6 2017median 17.6median 65.711.52.711.5hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Y6 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei Y6 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 1.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.7 / 2.5 / 3.2 Watt
Carga midlight 5.2 / 6.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Nokia 2
4100 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris VS
3100 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
46%
33%
41%
1%
33%
Idle Minimum *
1.7
0.55
68%
0.67
61%
0.61
64%
1.386 (0.54 - 4.02, n=7)
18%
0.848 (0.2 - 3.4, n=543)
50%
Idle Average *
2.5
1.02
59%
1.4
44%
1.7
32%
3.01 (1.6 - 6, n=7)
-20%
1.686 (0.6 - 6.2, n=542)
33%
Idle Maximum *
3.2
1.09
66%
1.52
52%
1.71
47%
3.33 (1.62 - 6.64, n=7)
-4%
1.914 (0.74 - 6.6, n=543)
40%
Load Average *
5.2
4.48
14%
4.56
12%
3.02
42%
5.22 (2.97 - 9.6, n=7)
-0%
3.96 (0.8 - 10.8, n=537)
24%
Load Maximum *
6.8
5.32
22%
7.05
-4%
5.31
22%
6.08 (4.34 - 7.34, n=7)
11%
5.57 (1.2 - 14.2, n=537)
18%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
22h 9min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 42min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 39min
Huawei Y6 2018
3000 mAh
Nokia 2
4100 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris VS
3100 mAh
Huawei Y6 2017
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
31%
-13%
6%
6%
Reader / Idle
1329
1233
-7%
1522
15%
H.264
702
645
-8%
693
-1%
WiFi v1.3
643
840
31%
518
-19%
681
6%
654
2%
Load
279
225
-19%
302
8%

Pro

+ Carcaça fina e com visual moderno
+ Alto-falantes com bom som
+ Permanece frio
+ Tela de alto contraste
+ Acessível

Contra

- Sem bússola, sem sensor de digitais
- Armazenamento interno reduzido
- Sem WiFi de 5 GHz
- Ocorrem dropouts do microfone no modo mãos livres
- Engasgamentos ocasionais
- Alto consumo de energia
The Huawei Y6 2018 in review: test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland.
The Huawei Y6 2018 in review: test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland.

O Huawei Y6 2018 é um bom pacote a um preço acessível. Embora você poderia gastar mais dinheiro em outros dispositivos, eles não terão necessariamente mais recursos do que o Y6 2018 oferece. O Y6 2018 oferece bom desempenho pelo dinheiro. A tela é relativamente brilhante e tem uma boa taxa de contraste, enquanto o GPS é preciso o suficiente para usar o Google Maps. As câmeras também tiram fotos aceitáveis. Da mesma forma, os alto-falantes soam bem e o dispositivo permanece mais frio sob uso intenso.

Naturalmente, existem algumas desvantagens com um dispositivo de menos de €150: não há scanner de digitais ou bússola, o consumo de energia é alto e ocorrem engasgos ocasionais que prejudicam a experiência do usuário.

O Huawei Y6 2018 é uma boa opção para quem quer poupar algum dinheiro. No entanto, não espere milagres.

Embora o preço limite o elogio que podemos dar, o Y6 2018 ainda recebe uma recomendação nossa. Simplesmente, o Huawei Y6 2018 oferece bom desempenho e valor pelo dinheiro.

Huawei Y6 2018 - 05/17/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
79%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
35 / 60 → 59%
Peso
92%
Bateria
93%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
7 / 63 → 10%
Desempenho da aplicação
40 / 70 → 57%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 61%
Camera
67%
Médio
68%
79%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Huawei Y6 2018
Florian Wimmer, 2018-05-23 (Update: 2018-06- 1)