Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus

Florian Wimmer (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/23/2018

Muita tela por pouco dinheiro. O Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus oferece uma grande tela e um desempenho de gama média por menos de 200 Euros (~$236). Isso soa como uma boa oferta, mas vamos dar uma olhada mais de perto no nosso teste!

Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Redmi Serie)
Placa gráfica
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5.99 polegadas 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 55.9 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 128 GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Sensor de aceleração, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, Rádio FM, USB OTG, WiFi Direct
Funcionamento em rede
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (Band 1,3,5,7,8,20,34,38,39,40,41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8.1 x 158.5 x 75.5
Bateria
15.2 Wh, 4000 mAh Lítio-Polímero, Quick Charge
Sistema Operativo
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/​2.2, phase comparison AF, dual-LED flash, videos @2160p/​30fp
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix LED flash, videos @1080p/​30fps
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falante mono na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, Security, Mi Drop, Mi Video, Mi Remote Control, 24 Meses Garantia, VoLTE, LTE Cat.6 (300 MBit/s download, 50 MBite/s upload), SAR values: 1.01 W/kg (head), 1.47 W/kg (body), fanless
peso
180 g, Suprimento de energia: 59 g
Preço
199 Euro

 

Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus

Größenvergleich

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=270)
196 MBit/s ∼100% +264%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
108 MBit/s ∼55% +100%
Ulefone Power 3
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
106 MBit/s ∼54% +97%
Maze Alpha X
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
82.8 MBit/s ∼42% +54%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s ∼28%
Honor 9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 MBit/s ∼27% -2%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=270)
191 MBit/s ∼100% +243%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s ∼53% +83%
Ulefone Power 3
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.1 MBit/s ∼52% +78%
Maze Alpha X
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
95.1 MBit/s ∼50% +71%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼29%
Honor 9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.9 MBit/s ∼26% -10%
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview, second attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview, second attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – gardens, second attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – gardens, second attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge, second attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge, second attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – overview, second attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – overview, second attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – gardens, second attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – gardens, second attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – bridge, second attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – bridge, second attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview, third attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview, third attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – gardens, third attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – gardens, third attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge, third attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge, third attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – overview, third attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – overview, third attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – garden, third attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – garden, third attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – bridge, third attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – bridge, third attempt

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
622
cd/m²
614
cd/m²
598
cd/m²
621
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
619
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
596
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 622 cd/m² Médio: 612.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 96 %
iluminação com acumulador: 613 cd/m²
Contraste: 1088:1 (Preto: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.46 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.073
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Maze Alpha X
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Ulefone Power 3
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Honor 9 Lite
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Gigaset GS370 Plus
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Screen
-93%
-4%
1%
-52%
Brightness middle
620
497
-20%
494
-20%
627
1%
472
-24%
Brightness
612
478
-22%
485
-21%
622
2%
468
-24%
Brightness Distribution
96
87
-9%
87
-9%
82
-15%
92
-4%
Black Level *
0.57
0.6
-5%
0.33
42%
0.41
28%
0.73
-28%
Contrast
1088
828
-24%
1497
38%
1529
41%
647
-41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.46
11.6
-235%
5.1
-47%
4.5
-30%
6.8
-97%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.88
22.1
-180%
9.9
-26%
7
11%
14.5
-84%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.9
13.5
-246%
3.5
10%
5.1
-31%
8.2
-110%
Gamma
2.073 106%
2.93 75%
2.16 102%
2.26 97%
2.13 103%
CCT
7230 90%
9955 65%
7253 90%
7201 90%
7924 82%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8811 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
11.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ ms rise
↘ ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41.1 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
60490 Points ∼84%
Maze Alpha X
63989 Points ∼89% +6%
Ulefone Power 3
54201 Points ∼75% -10%
Honor 9 Lite
67727 Points ∼94% +12%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
42909 Points ∼59% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (59867 - 68348, n=16)
63215 Points ∼88% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 232931, n=359)
72132 Points ∼100% +19%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
76178 Points ∼70%
Maze Alpha X
73822 Points ∼68% -3%
Ulefone Power 3
54192 Points ∼50% -29%
Honor 9 Lite
89639 Points ∼82% +18%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
55925 Points ∼51% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (79099 - 81789, n=6)
65458 Points ∼60% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=138)
109082 Points ∼100% +43%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4905 Points ∼100%
Maze Alpha X
3795 Points ∼77% -23%
Ulefone Power 3
4770 Points ∼97% -3%
Honor 9 Lite
4911 Points ∼100% 0%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
3394 Points ∼69% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4626 - 5558, n=13)
4891 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4748 - 8601, n=225)
4439 Points ∼90% -10%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
5801 Points ∼91%
Maze Alpha X
4562 Points ∼72% -21%
Ulefone Power 3
6344 Points ∼100% +9%
Honor 9 Lite
5887 Points ∼93% +1%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
4411 Points ∼70% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4596 - 7846, n=15)
5850 Points ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (4147 - 10571, n=389)
4739 Points ∼75% -18%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
722 Points ∼78%
Maze Alpha X
924 Points ∼100% +28%
Ulefone Power 3
829 Points ∼90% +15%
Honor 9 Lite
888 Points ∼96% +23%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
697 Points ∼75% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (649 - 958, n=16)
766 Points ∼83% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=466)
678 Points ∼73% -6%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1017 Points ∼63%
Maze Alpha X
1122 Points ∼69% +10%
Ulefone Power 3
855 Points ∼53% -16%
Honor 9 Lite
859 Points ∼53% -16%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
645 Points ∼40% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (968 - 1026, n=16)
1008 Points ∼62% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15875, n=466)
1622 Points ∼100% +59%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
961 Points ∼55%
Maze Alpha X
1294 Points ∼74% +35%
Ulefone Power 3
1566 Points ∼89% +63%
Honor 9 Lite
1757 Points ∼100% +83%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
799 Points ∼45% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (584 - 1553, n=16)
1004 Points ∼57% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=466)
1157 Points ∼66% +20%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3236 Points ∼100%
Maze Alpha X
3064 Points ∼95% -5%
Ulefone Power 3
2906 Points ∼90% -10%
Honor 9 Lite
3058 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
1882 Points ∼58% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1960 - 3261, n=16)
2797 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=466)
2351 Points ∼73% -27%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1229 Points ∼86%
Maze Alpha X
1424 Points ∼100% +16%
Ulefone Power 3
1340 Points ∼94% +9%
Honor 9 Lite
1423 Points ∼100% +16%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
906 Points ∼64% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1019 - 1323, n=16)
1196 Points ∼84% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=470)
1178 Points ∼83% -4%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3316 Points ∼81%
Maze Alpha X
2726 Points ∼66% -18%
Honor 9 Lite
3117 Points ∼76% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (2628 - 3678, n=9)
3246 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14417, n=164)
4116 Points ∼100% +24%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4292 Points ∼100%
Maze Alpha X
3795 Points ∼88% -12%
Honor 9 Lite
3730 Points ∼87% -13%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
2624 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3148 - 4396, n=11)
4152 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 11598, n=213)
4133 Points ∼96% -4%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
870 Points ∼71%
Maze Alpha X
833 Points ∼68% -4%
Honor 9 Lite
945 Points ∼78% +9%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
618 Points ∼51% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (841 - 881, n=12)
792 Points ∼65% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=214)
1218 Points ∼100% +40%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2038 Points ∼100%
Maze Alpha X
1700 Points ∼83% -17%
Ulefone Power 3
1240 Points ∼61% -39%
Honor 9 Lite
1748 Points ∼86% -14%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
1129 Points ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1636 - 2177, n=16)
1951 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 3669, n=319)
1572 Points ∼77% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
379 Points ∼34%
Maze Alpha X
598 Points ∼54% +58%
Ulefone Power 3
54 Points ∼5% -86%
Honor 9 Lite
253 Points ∼23% -33%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
325 Points ∼29% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (372 - 393, n=16)
383 Points ∼35% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5220, n=319)
1103 Points ∼100% +191%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
463 Points ∼44%
Maze Alpha X
699 Points ∼66% +51%
Ulefone Power 3
69 Points ∼7% -85%
Honor 9 Lite
312 Points ∼30% -33%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
386 Points ∼37% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (452 - 480, n=16)
466 Points ∼44% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=327)
1054 Points ∼100% +128%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2058 Points ∼100%
Maze Alpha X
1725 Points ∼84% -16%
Ulefone Power 3
1237 Points ∼60% -40%
Honor 9 Lite
1788 Points ∼87% -13%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
1116 Points ∼54% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1631 - 2157, n=16)
1961 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 3642, n=350)
1471 Points ∼71% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
732 Points ∼49%
Maze Alpha X
928 Points ∼62% +27%
Ulefone Power 3
57 Points ∼4% -92%
Honor 9 Lite
184 Points ∼12% -75%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
480 Points ∼32% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (390 - 743, n=16)
707 Points ∼47% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (104 - 8312, n=350)
1499 Points ∼100% +105%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
854 Points ∼67%
Maze Alpha X
1034 Points ∼81% +21%
Ulefone Power 3
72 Points ∼6% -92%
Honor 9 Lite
230 Points ∼18% -73%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
550 Points ∼43% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (476 - 870, n=16)
822 Points ∼64% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (127 - 6378, n=358)
1279 Points ∼100% +50%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
15593 Points ∼99%
Maze Alpha X
15189 Points ∼97% -3%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
14780 Points ∼94% -5%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
10201 Points ∼65% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (14195 - 16267, n=15)
15724 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (7103 - 36762, n=505)
12408 Points ∼79% -20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13219 Points ∼79%
Maze Alpha X
13708 Points ∼82% +4%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
11712 Points ∼70% -11%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
9094 Points ∼54% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7668 - 13491, n=15)
12929 Points ∼77% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 160199, n=505)
16687 Points ∼100% +26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13682 Points ∼97%
Maze Alpha X
14012 Points ∼99% +2%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
12278 Points ∼87% -10%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
9968 Points ∼70% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8541 - 14003, n=15)
13443 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=506)
14150 Points ∼100% +3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
23 fps ∼79%
Maze Alpha X
24 fps ∼82% +4%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
19 fps ∼65% -17%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
17 fps ∼58% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (22 - 23, n=16)
22.9 fps ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=529)
29.2 fps ∼100% +27%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
17 fps ∼68%
Maze Alpha X
21 fps ∼84% +24%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
18 fps ∼72% +6%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
25 fps ∼100% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (17 - 35, n=16)
22.1 fps ∼88% +30%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=532)
24.1 fps ∼96% +42%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.9 fps ∼64%
Maze Alpha X
11 fps ∼71% +11%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
8.6 fps ∼55% -13%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
7 fps ∼45% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 10, n=16)
9.4 fps ∼61% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 115, n=452)
15.5 fps ∼100% +57%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.4 fps ∼62%
Maze Alpha X
9.5 fps ∼63% +1%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
8.4 fps ∼55% -11%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
13 fps ∼86% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7.4 - 18, n=16)
10.1 fps ∼66% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=454)
15.2 fps ∼100% +62%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.5 fps ∼49%
Maze Alpha X
3.7 fps ∼28% -43%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
3.2 fps ∼24% -51%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
4.6 fps ∼35% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.5 - 7, n=16)
6.21 fps ∼47% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 69.3, n=316)
13.3 fps ∼100% +105%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.2 fps ∼47%
Maze Alpha X
6 fps ∼45% -3%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
5 fps ∼38% -19%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
10 fps ∼76% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 14, n=16)
6.53 fps ∼49% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=318)
13.2 fps ∼100% +113%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.5 fps ∼38%
Maze Alpha X
4.1 fps ∼45% +17%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
3.2 fps ∼35% -9%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
2.4 fps ∼26% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.4 - 3.8, n=15)
3.51 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 40, n=248)
9.16 fps ∼100% +162%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.4 fps ∼41%
Maze Alpha X
3.6 fps ∼43% +6%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
2.9 fps ∼35% -15%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
4.9 fps ∼59% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 7.4, n=15)
3.75 fps ∼45% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 50, n=251)
8.35 fps ∼100% +146%

Legend

 
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Maze Alpha X Mediatek Helio P25, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Power 3 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS370 Plus Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=387)
35.1 Points ∼100% +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (23.1 - 31.8, n=16)
27.6 Points ∼79% +19%
Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64)
27.463 Points ∼78% +19%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
26.42 Points ∼75% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
23.097 Points ∼66%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
22.91 Points ∼65% -1%
Gigaset GS370 Plus (Chrome 63)
19.949 Points ∼57% -14%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=523)
5237 Points ∼100% +18%
Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64)
4990 Points ∼95% +13%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
4742 Points ∼91% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3804 - 4979, n=16)
4571 Points ∼87% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
4424 Points ∼84%
Gigaset GS370 Plus (Chrome 63)
3310 Points ∼63% -25%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
3155 Points ∼60% -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
23714.1 ms * ∼100% -118%
Gigaset GS370 Plus (Chrome 63)
12469.7 ms * ∼53% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=542)
11780 ms * ∼50% -8%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
10895 ms * ∼46%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
10250.4 ms * ∼43% +6%
Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64)
10244 ms * ∼43% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8028 - 10895, n=16)
9107 ms * ∼38% +16%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
112 Points ∼100%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
108 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=260)
104 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (60 - 112, n=11)
88.5 Points ∼79% -21%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
43 Points ∼38% -62%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi 5 PlusMaze Alpha XUlefone Power 3Honor 9 LiteGigaset GS370 PlusAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
8%
36%
136%
15%
12%
-15%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.46
73.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
24%
71.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
21%
71.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
21%
56.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
53.1 (14.1 - 74.7, n=59)
-11%
44.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=294)
-26%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.38
80.96 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
81.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
83.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
76.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
72 (21.1 - 86.9, n=59)
-15%
62.6 (8.2 - 96.5, n=294)
-26%
Random Write 4KB
7.1
11.61
64%
21.25
199%
66.83
841%
17.1
141%
18 (3.4 - 83.5, n=67)
154%
14.1 (0.14 - 164, n=575)
99%
Random Read 4KB
79.5
70.27
-12%
61.38
-23%
68.39
-14%
48.4
-39%
48.4 (11.4 - 149, n=67)
-39%
35.7 (1.59 - 173, n=575)
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB
194.5
162.16
-17%
214.88
10%
138.21
-29%
182.4
-6%
161 (40 - 216, n=67)
-17%
74.7 (2.99 - 228, n=575)
-62%
Sequential Read 256KB
270
247.44
-8%
294.58
9%
269.56
0%
284.9
6%
268 (115 - 704, n=67)
-1%
218 (12.1 - 895, n=575)
-19%
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min31 fps
 high HD31 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Shadow Fight 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high53 fps
 minimal54 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 36.6 °C34.7 °C35.8 °C 
 36.3 °C35 °C35.7 °C 
 35.9 °C35.3 °C35.2 °C 
Máximo: 36.6 °C
Médio: 35.6 °C
34.1 °C35 °C36.2 °C
35 °C35.1 °C35.8 °C
35 °C35.5 °C35.5 °C
Máximo: 36.2 °C
Médio: 35.2 °C
alimentação elétrica  35.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.332.42538.2353134.145.54034.934.35043.336.96328.627.98025.825.510024.224.31252130.51602141.520020.150.125019.955.831518.260.440017.964.550017.667.963016.472.980016.572.7100015.875.3125015.474.7160015.174.1200015.273.8250015.274.6315015.177.7400015.176500015.178.2630015.176.4800015.2711000015.267.31250015.360.71600015.144.4SPL27.986.9N170median 15.4Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plusmedian 71Delta1.810.635.238.332.938.737.231.131.732.939.636.328.330.627.327.126.930.326.729.12435.220.939.920.943.519.548.618.556.917.560.417.563.315.765.415.87016.671.815.873.215.470.715.571.11672.515.878167916.375.216.375.216.277.716.468.716.458.328.686.11.162.4median 16.4Honor 9 Litemedian 68.72.112.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 9 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.4 / 0.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.7 / 2.8 / 3.4 Watt
Carga midlight 4.2 / 7.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
Maze Alpha X
3900 mAh
Ulefone Power 3
6080 mAh
Honor 9 Lite
3000 mAh
Gigaset GS370 Plus
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
11%
31%
21%
24%
12%
16%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.9
-29%
0.79
-13%
0.85
-21%
0.77
-10%
0.979 (0.49 - 2.2, n=16)
-40%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=603)
-26%
Idle Average *
2.8
2.14
24%
1.82
35%
2
29%
1.58
44%
2.01 (0.87 - 3.92, n=16)
28%
1.718 (0.6 - 6.2, n=602)
39%
Idle Maximum *
3.4
2.18
36%
1.87
45%
2.04
40%
1.73
49%
2.29 (0.9 - 4.03, n=16)
33%
1.987 (0.74 - 6.6, n=603)
42%
Load Average *
4.2
3.96
6%
2.7
36%
3.23
23%
3.59
15%
3.52 (1.69 - 6.2, n=16)
16%
4.02 (0.8 - 10.8, n=597)
4%
Load Maximum *
7.2
5.81
19%
3.62
50%
4.93
32%
5.69
21%
5.4 (3.8 - 7.2, n=16)
25%
5.68 (1.2 - 14.2, n=597)
21%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 17min
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
Maze Alpha X
3900 mAh
Ulefone Power 3
6080 mAh
Honor 9 Lite
3000 mAh
Gigaset GS370 Plus
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
21%
177%
21%
-2%
Reader / Idle
1624
965
WiFi v1.3
497
603
21%
1376
177%
601
21%
487
-2%
Load
240
253
H.264
622

Pro

+ Ótimo alto-falante
+ Boa qualidade de voz
+ Quase nenhum bloatware
+ Tela brilhante com boa reprodução de cores
+ Desempenho bastante poderoso
+ Carcaça de alta qualidade

Contra

- Problemas com o receptor de GPS em alguns aplicativos
- WLAN lento
- Sem Android 8 (ainda)
- Alto consumo de energia em partes
- Duração da bateria medíocre
Testing the Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
Testing the Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

O Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus oferece um moderno formato de tela 18:9 com marcos pequenos, uma boa qualidade de voz, um ótimo alto-falante, uma carcaça de alta qualidade e valores decentes de desempenho.

No entanto, você não deve esperar muito da câmera e da duração da bateria. Para usuários tecnicamente menos versados, também é difícil descobrir que o modo de economia de energia integrado bloqueia as funções do GPS em alguns aplicativos. Quem navega muito na Internet pode não estar satisfeito com o Redmi 5 Plus, e há dispositivos consideravelmente mais rápidos para isso.

Apesar de suas arestas em alguns recursos, o Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus é um bom negócio.

Então você deve comprar este smartphone da Xiaomi? Diríamos que sim. Se você pode viver com as fraquezas que mencionamos, o smartphone oferece uma boa relação custo-benefício. Enquanto isso não é tão bom no papel como em alguns de seus predecessores, muitas coisas, como a garantia, funcionam melhor agora. 

Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus - 05/15/2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
88%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
93%
Conectividade
41 / 60 → 69%
Peso
90%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
28 / 63 → 44%
Desempenho da aplicação
50 / 70 → 72%
Temperatura
91%
Ruído
100%
Audio
70 / 91 → 77%
Camera
67%
Médio
74%
83%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Florian Wimmer, 2018-05-23 (Update: 2018-06- 2)