Breve Análise do Smartphone Google Pixel 3 XL

Name: Breve Análise do Smartphone Google Pixel 3 XL
Item: Google Pixel 3 XL
Rating: 90
Author: Florian Schmitt

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/28/2018

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone Google Nexus / Pixel

Giant Pixel. Agora, em sua terceira geração de smartphones Pixel, a Google quer atrair potenciais compradores de seus concorrentes com recursos de software exclusivos. No entanto, os preços acessíveis são uma coisa do passado, dado que o Pixel 3 XL custa até $999. Descubra em nossa análise se o Pixel 3 XL vale o seu preço.

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Google Pixel 3 XL (Pixel Serie)

Processador

Qualcomm Snapdragon 845

Placa gráfica

Qualcomm Adreno 630

Memória

4096 MB

Pantalha

6.3 polegadas 18.5:9, 2960 x 1440 pixel 522 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, HDR Support, Brilhante: sim

Disco rígido

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 55 GB livre

Conexões

1 USB 3.0, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Barômetro, Bússola, Giroscópio, Sensor de proximidade

Funcionamento em rede

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. 3G: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B13, B17, B18, B19, B20, B25, B26, B28, B29, B30, B32, B38, B39, B40, B41, B42, B46, B66, B71., LTE, GPS

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 158 x 76.7

Bateria

13 Wh, 3430 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12.2 MPix 1.4μm, f/1.8, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF) - dual-pixel, Laser AF, OIS, dual-LED flash, videos in up to 2160p at 30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , f/1.8, PDAF, videos in up to 1080p - main camera; 8.0 MP, f/2.2, wide-angle lens - secondary camera

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo frontais, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB Type-C, 3,5 mm para USB Type-C, adaptador USB OTG, fones USB Type-C, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, IP68 certified, pressure sensitive frame, SAR values: Head - 1.39 W/kg, Body - 1.40 W/kg, fanless

peso

184 g, Suprimento de energia: 75 g

Preço

949 Euro

Links

Google página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Google Pixel 3 XL Google Pixel 2 XL Huawei Mate 20 Pro Apple iPhone Xs Max

Os Top 10

» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	677 MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	652 MBit/s ∼96% +3%
Google Pixel 3 XL Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	635 (min: 315, max: 645) MBit/s ∼94%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	624 MBit/s ∼92% -2%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	615 (min: 532, max: 642) MBit/s ∼91% -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	491 (min: 100, max: 534) MBit/s ∼73% -23%
Google Pixel 2 XL Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	239 MBit/s ∼35% -62%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 939, n=303)	210 MBit/s ∼31% -67%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	696 (min: 647, max: 714) MBit/s ∼100% +53%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	663 (min: 289, max: 805) MBit/s ∼95% +45%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	647 MBit/s ∼93% +42%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	602 MBit/s ∼86% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	519 MBit/s ∼75% +14%
Google Pixel 3 XL Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	456 (min: 429, max: 468) MBit/s ∼66%
Google Pixel 2 XL Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	279 MBit/s ∼40% -39%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 703, n=303)	205 MBit/s ∼29% -55%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø634 (618-645)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø456 (429-468)

GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Cycling through a grove

GPS test: Google Pixel 3 XL - Cycling through a grove

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


418 cd/m²	413 cd/m²	412 cd/m²
414 cd/m²	410 cd/m²	410 cd/m²
419 cd/m²	414 cd/m²	407 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 419 cd/m² Médio: 413 cd/m² Minimum: 2.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 410 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.16 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.219

	Google Pixel 3 XL AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3	Apple iPhone Xs Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5	Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2	Huawei Mate 20 Pro OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3	Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8	Google Pixel 2 XL P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Screen		34%	17%	29%	1%	-11%
Brightness middle	410	656 60%	565 38%	576 40%	477 16%	415 1%
Brightness	413	659 60%	571 38%	582 41%	453 10%	420 2%
Brightness Distribution	97	88 -9%	96 -1%	90 -7%	86 -11%	87 -10%
Black Level *					0.33
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	3.16	1.7 46%	2.3 27%	1.3 59%	2.1 34%	2.7 15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	5.5	2.8 49%	4.8 13%	3.5 36%	8.2 -49%	4.3 22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	1.7	1.7 -0%	1.9 -12%	1.6 6%	1.6 6%	3.3 -94%
Gamma	2.219 ^99%	1.998 ^110%	2.16 ^102%	2.18 ^101%	2.28 ^96%	2.36 ^93%
CCT	6653 ^98%	6487 ^100%	6332 ^103%	6561 ^99%	6425 ^101%	6787 ^96%
Contrast					1445

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

250 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8943 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).

Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	10876 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	6202 Points ∼43% -43%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	8938 Points ∼62% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	14417 Points ∼100% +33%
Google Pixel 2 XL	7568 Points ∼52% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=19)	13635 Points ∼95% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=197)	4524 Points ∼31% -58%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	8292 Points ∼74%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	11244 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	8963 Points ∼80% +8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	10024 Points ∼89% +21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	8522 Points ∼76% +3%
Google Pixel 2 XL	6253 Points ∼56% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=21)	8655 Points ∼77% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=247)	4308 Points ∼38% -48%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	2325 Points ∼49%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	4774 Points ∼100% +105%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	3776 Points ∼79% +62%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	3378 Points ∼71% +45%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	2457 Points ∼51% +6%
Google Pixel 2 XL	1916 Points ∼40% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=21)	2417 Points ∼51% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=248)	1270 Points ∼27% -45%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	9029 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	5319 Points ∼58% -41%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	9225 Points ∼100% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	8178 Points ∼89% -9%
Google Pixel 2 XL	6994 Points ∼76% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8326 - 9868, n=22)	8018 Points ∼87% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=255)	4555 Points ∼49% -50%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	11180 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	5822 Points ∼46% -48%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	12535 Points ∼100% +12%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	9858 Points ∼79% -12%
Google Pixel 2 XL	8258 Points ∼66% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=20)	10123 Points ∼81% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=423)	4958 Points ∼40% -56%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	3676 Points ∼84%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	2723 Points ∼62% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	2546 Points ∼58% -31%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4364 Points ∼100% +19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	2713 Points ∼62% -26%
Google Pixel 2 XL	3035 Points ∼70% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2223 - 3764, n=22)	3110 Points ∼71% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (2293 - 4439, n=277)	1709 Points ∼39% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	5789 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	4828 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	3792 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4250 Points ∼73% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	5651 Points ∼98% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL	4405 Points ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4209 - 8206, n=22)	5494 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=277)	1465 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	5133 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	4121 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	3420 Points ∼67% -33%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4275 Points ∼83% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	4555 Points ∼89% -11%
Google Pixel 2 XL	4003 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3512 - 5189, n=22)	4646 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1010 - 5189, n=280)	1360 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	3280 Points ∼74%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	2961 Points ∼67% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	2561 Points ∼58% -22%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4407 Points ∼100% +34%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	2721 Points ∼62% -17%
Google Pixel 2 XL	2994 Points ∼68% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2110 - 3763, n=21)	3081 Points ∼70% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=292)	1689 Points ∼38% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	8380 Points ∼81%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	10374 Points ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	4797 Points ∼46% -43%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	5854 Points ∼56% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	7609 Points ∼73% -9%
Google Pixel 2 XL	6282 Points ∼61% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5228 - 8451, n=21)	7720 Points ∼74% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=292)	2068 Points ∼20% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	6228 Points ∼93%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	6667 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	4018 Points ∼60% -35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	5456 Points ∼82% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	5438 Points ∼82% -13%
Google Pixel 2 XL	5050 Points ∼76% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4054 - 6568, n=21)	5771 Points ∼87% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=293)	1734 Points ∼26% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	3605 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	3027 Points ∼72% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	2469 Points ∼59% -32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4183 Points ∼100% +16%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	3620 Points ∼87% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL	3028 Points ∼72% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=21)	3268 Points ∼78% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)	1642 Points ∼39% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	5089 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	3726 Points ∼72% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	3582 Points ∼69% -30%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4206 Points ∼81% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	5190 Points ∼100% +2%
Google Pixel 2 XL	3872 Points ∼75% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5241, n=21)	4944 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)	1186 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	4662 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	3544 Points ∼75% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	3256 Points ∼69% -30%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4201 Points ∼89% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	4734 Points ∼100% +2%
Google Pixel 2 XL	3646 Points ∼77% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=21)	4424 Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)	1134 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	3594 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	2713 Points ∼65% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	2496 Points ∼60% -31%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4150 Points ∼100% +15%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	2541 Points ∼61% -29%
Google Pixel 2 XL	2995 Points ∼72% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3668, n=21)	3129 Points ∼75% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=384)	1540 Points ∼37% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	7780 Points ∼95%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	7055 Points ∼86% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	4637 Points ∼56% -40%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	5305 Points ∼65% -32%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	8219 Points ∼100% +6%
Google Pixel 2 XL	5856 Points ∼71% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=21)	7818 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=384)	1632 Points ∼20% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	6180 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	5205 Points ∼84% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	3895 Points ∼63% -37%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4996 Points ∼81% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	5492 Points ∼89% -11%
Google Pixel 2 XL	4831 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4529 - 6454, n=21)	5843 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=392)	1387 Points ∼22% -78%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	15614 Points ∼42%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	27717 Points ∼75% +78%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	26226 Points ∼71% +68%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	36755 Points ∼100% +135%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	36762 Points ∼100% +135%
Google Pixel 2 XL	20233 Points ∼55% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=21)	33400 Points ∼91% +114%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=539)	12880 Points ∼35% -18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	53794 Points ∼34%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	159735 Points ∼100% +197%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	46610 Points ∼29% -13%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	67730 Points ∼42% +26%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	81502 Points ∼51% +52%
Google Pixel 2 XL	54156 Points ∼34% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 84998, n=21)	80111 Points ∼50% +49%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=539)	17994 Points ∼11% -67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	34855 Points ∼45%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	77599 Points ∼100% +123%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	39745 Points ∼51% +14%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	57047 Points ∼74% +64%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	64152 Points ∼83% +84%
Google Pixel 2 XL	39456 Points ∼51% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=21)	60990 Points ∼79% +75%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=540)	15114 Points ∼19% -57%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	140 fps ∼62%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	226 fps ∼100% +61%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	147 fps ∼65% +5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	120 fps ∼53% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	150 fps ∼66% +7%
Google Pixel 2 XL	112 fps ∼50% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=22)	144 fps ∼64% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=564)	31.4 fps ∼14% -78%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	60 fps ∼96%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	60 fps ∼96% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	60 fps ∼96% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	61 fps ∼97% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	60 fps ∼96% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL	59 fps ∼94% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=21)	62.7 fps ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=567)	25 fps ∼40% -58%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	56 fps ∼52%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	107 fps ∼100% +91%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	74 fps ∼69% +32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	73 fps ∼68% +30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	71 fps ∼66% +27%
Google Pixel 2 XL	59 fps ∼55% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=21)	73 fps ∼68% +30%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=486)	16.8 fps ∼16% -70%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	37 fps ∼63%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	59 fps ∼100% +59%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	45 fps ∼76% +22%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	42 fps ∼71% +14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	58 fps ∼98% +57%
Google Pixel 2 XL	35 fps ∼59% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 75, n=21)	55 fps ∼93% +49%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=489)	16 fps ∼27% -57%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	45 fps ∼65%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	69.3 fps ∼100% +54%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	47 fps ∼68% +4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	29 fps ∼42% -36%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	58 fps ∼84% +29%
Google Pixel 2 XL	41 fps ∼59% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=22)	54.4 fps ∼78% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)	14.3 fps ∼21% -68%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	25 fps ∼42%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	58.9 fps ∼100% +136%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	24 fps ∼41% -4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	26 fps ∼44% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	56 fps ∼95% +124%
Google Pixel 2 XL	20 fps ∼34% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 59, n=21)	46.5 fps ∼79% +86%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)	13.9 fps ∼24% -44%

GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone Xs Max	32.1 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	19 fps ∼59%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	25 fps ∼78%
Google Pixel 2 XL	9.5 fps ∼30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 25, n=10)	19.8 fps ∼62%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=62)	10.2 fps ∼32%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone Xs Max	16.3 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	13 fps ∼80%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	14 fps ∼86%
Google Pixel 2 XL	9.9 fps ∼61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (11 - 31, n=10)	15.4 fps ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=62)	6.49 fps ∼40%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone Xs Max	47 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	18 fps ∼38%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	40 fps ∼85%
Google Pixel 2 XL	16 fps ∼34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (20 - 40, n=10)	28.5 fps ∼61%
Average of class Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=62)	14.4 fps ∼31%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone Xs Max	36.8 fps ∼97%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	33 fps ∼87%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	38 fps ∼100%
Google Pixel 2 XL	26 fps ∼68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (29 - 38, n=9)	35 fps ∼92%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 63, n=61)	15.7 fps ∼41%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	33 fps ∼83%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	40 fps ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	28 fps ∼70% -15%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	31 fps ∼78% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	35 fps ∼88% +6%
Google Pixel 2 XL	24 fps ∼60% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=21)	34 fps ∼85% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)	9.86 fps ∼25% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	18 fps ∼49%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	31 fps ∼84% +72%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	14 fps ∼38% -22%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	16 fps ∼43% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	37 fps ∼100% +106%
Google Pixel 2 XL	13 fps ∼35% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (17 - 37, n=21)	28.3 fps ∼76% +57%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)	8.89 fps ∼24% -51%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	285269 Points ∼94%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	302955 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	250577 Points ∼83% -12%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	300617 Points ∼99% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	246366 Points ∼81% -14%
Google Pixel 2 XL	204654 Points ∼68% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=22)	275958 Points ∼91% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=170)	118332 Points ∼39% -59%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	215632 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	222290 Points ∼89% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	250848 Points ∼100% +16%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	226124 Points ∼90% +5%
Google Pixel 2 XL	166151 Points ∼66% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=18)	223967 Points ∼89% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=387)	75990 Points ∼30% -65%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	1176 Points ∼68%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	1731 Points ∼100% +47%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	1109 Points ∼64% -6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	1424 Points ∼82% +21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	1400 Points ∼81% +19%
Google Pixel 2 XL	1186 Points ∼69% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=20)	1348 Points ∼78% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=499)	698 Points ∼40% -41%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	7989 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	15659 Points ∼100% +96%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	6370 Points ∼41% -20%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	6273 Points ∼40% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	7743 Points ∼49% -3%
Google Pixel 2 XL	6142 Points ∼39% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=20)	7816 Points ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=499)	1737 Points ∼11% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	2825 Points ∼45%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	1815 Points ∼29% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	2625 Points ∼42% -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	6283 Points ∼100% +122%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	3704 Points ∼59% +31%
Google Pixel 2 XL	2927 Points ∼47% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=20)	3594 Points ∼57% +27%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=499)	1244 Points ∼20% -56%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	4417 Points ∼38%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	11675 Points ∼100% +164%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	6413 Points ∼55% +45%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	8604 Points ∼74% +95%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	8418 Points ∼72% +91%
Google Pixel 2 XL	5914 Points ∼51% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4417 - 8613, n=20)	7657 Points ∼66% +73%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=499)	2512 Points ∼22% -43%
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL	3291 Points ∼67%
Apple iPhone Xs Max	4895 Points ∼100% +49%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	3302 Points ∼67% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro	4687 Points ∼96% +42%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	4288 Points ∼88% +30%
Google Pixel 2 XL	3351 Points ∼68% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3291 - 4693, n=20)	4099 Points ∼84% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=503)	1255 Points ∼26% -62%

Legend

Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	273.01 Points ∼100% +260%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	109.18 Points ∼40% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=22)	76.9 Points ∼28% +1%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)	75.8 Points ∼28%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)	71.172 Points ∼26% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)	69.59 Points ∼25% -8%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)	64.709 Points ∼24% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=422)	36.7 Points ∼13% -52%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	43114 Points ∼100% +166%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	23285 Points ∼54% +43%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)	16228 Points ∼38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=22)	15431 Points ∼36% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)	14760 Points ∼34% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)	13360 Points ∼31% -18%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)	11308 Points ∼26% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=557)	5556 Points ∼13% -66%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=578)	11474 ms * ∼100% -312%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)	3434.1 ms * ∼30% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)	3179 ms * ∼28% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=22)	2874 ms * ∼25% -3%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)	2785 ms * ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)	2059.7 ms * ∼18% +26%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	1951.9 ms * ∼17% +30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	603.1 ms * ∼5% +78%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	155 Points ∼100% +55%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	124 Points ∼80% +24%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)	100 Points ∼65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=15)	84.5 Points ∼55% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)	75 Points ∼48% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	64 Points ∼41% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=63)	63.6 Points ∼41% -36%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	347 Points ∼100% +21%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	334 Points ∼96% +16%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)	287 Points ∼83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (260 - 291, n=21)	233 Points ∼67% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)	211 Points ∼61% -26%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)	194 Points ∼56% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)	164 Points ∼47% -43%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 362, n=284)	111 Points ∼32% -61%

* ... smaller is better

	Google Pixel 3 XL	Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	Huawei Mate 20 Pro	Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	Google Pixel 2 XL	Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-14%	18%	-20%	-10%	-13%	-71%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard		67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	72.38 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)	30.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		50.2 (17.1 - 71.9, n=25)	45.5 (3.4 - 87.1, n=317)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard		79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	83.18 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)	34.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		66.4 (18 - 86.6, n=25)	63.7 (8.2 - 96.5, n=317)
Random Write 4KB	132.7	22.74 -83%	157.84 19%	21.75 -84%	17.84 -87%	50.5 (8.77 - 156, n=34) -62%	16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=607) -88%
Random Read 4KB	120.8	129.68 7%	157.42 30%	135.99 13%	170.55 41%	134 (78.2 - 173, n=34) 11%	38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=607) -68%
Sequential Write 256KB	228.6	204.94 -10%	196.39 -14%	170.98 -25%	195.26 -15%	193 (133 - 229, n=34) -16%	79.9 (2.99 - 246, n=607) -65%
Sequential Read 256KB	632.6	818.69 29%	853.28 35%	748.59 18%	760.14 20%	727 (529 - 895, n=34) 15%	230 (12.1 - 895, n=607) -64%

Arena of Valor
	Configurações	Valor
	min	60 fps
	high HD	60 fps

Shadow Fight 3
	Configurações	Valor
	high	60 fps
	minimal	60 fps

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


40.9 °C	38.3 °C	36.9 °C
41.9 °C	38.3 °C	37.4 °C
42 °C	38.9 °C	36.5 °C

Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 39 °C


35.1 °C	37.8 °C	39.8 °C
35.7 °C	37.9 °C	39.9 °C
36.4 °C	38.4 °C	39.8 °C

Máximo: 39.9 °C
Médio: 37.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 42.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Google Pixel 3 XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ocioso	0.7 / 1.4 / 2 Watt
Carga	4.8 / 9.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Google Pixel 3 XL 3430 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium 3540 mAh	Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		1%	26%	-12%	-13%	-15%	-8%	1%
Idle Minimum *	0.7	1 -43%	0.68 3%	0.95 -36%	0.67 4%	1.28 -83%	0.802 (0.42 - 1.8, n=19) -15%	0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=635) -26%
Idle Average *	1.4	1.4 -0%	0.95 32%	2.17 -55%	2.5 -79%	1.87 -34%	1.722 (0.67 - 2.9, n=19) -23%	1.721 (0.6 - 6.2, n=634) -23%
Idle Maximum *	2	1.7 15%	1.09 45%	2.25 -13%	2.51 -26%	1.89 5%	2.1 (0.87 - 3.5, n=19) -5%	1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=635) -0%
Load Average *	4.8	4.6 4%	4.58 5%	4.47 7%	4.3 10%	3.73 22%	4.79 (3.64 - 7.2, n=19) -0%	4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=629) 16%
Load Maximum *	9.5	6.7 29%	5.16 46%	6.15 35%	6.87 28%	8.08 15%	9.2 (6.2 - 12.3, n=19) 3%	5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=629) 39%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		28h 45min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		11h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 04min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 59min

	Google Pixel 3 XL 3430 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium 3540 mAh	Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh
Battery Runtime		-8%	-19%	6%	-23%	-6%
Reader / Idle	1725	1305 -24%	1343 -22%	1747 1%	1347 -22%	1706 -1%
H.264	724	801 11%	674 -7%	854 18%	520 -28%	672 -7%
WiFi v1.3	691	742 7%	521 -25%	767 11%	547 -21%	581 -16%
Load	299	223 -25%	237 -21%	282 -6%	235 -21%	302 1%

Pro

+ Carcaça sólida e estável

+ Boas câmeras

+ Diversas bandas LTE

+ Recursos de software exclusivos

+ Muitos acessórios

+ Tela de cores precisas

+ Sem afogamento sob carga contínua

+ Alto-falantes impressionantes

+ Boa duração da bateria

Contra

- Sem desbloqueio facial

- Faltam alguns recursos de vídeo modernos

- Caro

- Entalhe grande

- Qualidade medíocre de chamadas para um carro chefe

- GPS inexato

Se você não gosta de entalhes, pode parar de ler agora. O Google Pixel 3 XL tem um nível enorme, que já está um passo atrás de alguns de seus concorrentes que têm entalhes menos obstrutivos, sensores de digitais na tela e até mesmo uma câmera frontal deslizante para maximizar suas relações de tela a corpo.

A câmera traseira do Google Pixel 3 XL tira fotos incríveis, mas seus recursos de vídeo estão desatualizados. Além disso, as câmeras frontais duplas são úteis, mas somente se você tirar selfies regularmente. Os recursos de RA e Digital Wellbeing também são novos, mas eles já estavam disponíveis com aplicativos de terceiros, portanto não são exatamente inovadores.

O Google Pixel 3 XL é muito caro pelo preço total para nos convencer de seus muitos excelentes recursos. Simplesmente não faz nada para se destacar da multidão.

O que resta com o Google Pixel 3 XL, é um smartphone elegante e bem construído que faz muitas coisas bem e poucas coisas mal. Infelizmente, não faz nada para se destacar de um mercado já saturado. A Google está otimista em cobrar até $999 pela versão de 128 GB. Recomendamos que você confira o Pixel 3 XL se puder comprá-lo abaixo do preço de varejo, já que é um ótimo smartphone com câmeras e alto-falantes de primeira classe.

Google Pixel 3 XL - 2018-11-2411/24/2018 v6
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento

92%

Teclado

66 / 75 → 88%

Mouse

97%

Conectividade

42 / 60 → 70%

Peso

89%

Bateria

94%

Pantalha

89%

Desempenho do jogos

67 / 63 → 100%

Desempenho da aplicação

74 / 70 → 100%

Temperatura

89%

Ruído

100%

Audio

81 / 91 → 89%

Camera

85%

Médio

82%

90%

Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Breve Análise do Smartphone Google Pixel 3 XL

Size Comparison

Os Top 10

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Google Pixel 3 XL audio analysis

Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Pricecompare