Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Google Pixel 3 XL

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/28/2018

Giant Pixel. Agora, em sua terceira geração de smartphones Pixel, a Google quer atrair potenciais compradores de seus concorrentes com recursos de software exclusivos. No entanto, os preços acessíveis são uma coisa do passado, dado que o Pixel 3 XL custa até $999. Descubra em nossa análise se o Pixel 3 XL vale o seu preço.

Google Pixel 3 XL (Pixel Serie)
Placa gráfica
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
6.3 polegadas 18.5:9, 2960 x 1440 pixel 522 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, HDR Support, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 55 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Barômetro, Bússola, Giroscópio, Sensor de proximidade
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. 3G: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B13, B17, B18, B19, B20, B25, B26, B28, B29, B30, B32, B38, B39, B40, B41, B42, B46, B66, B71., LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 158 x 76.7
Bateria
13 Wh, 3430 mAh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12.2 MPix 1.4μm, f/1.8, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF) - dual-pixel, Laser AF, OIS, dual-LED flash, videos in up to 2160p at 30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix , f/1.8, PDAF, videos in up to 1080p - main camera; 8.0 MP, f/2.2, wide-angle lens - secondary camera
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo frontais, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Carregador, cabo USB Type-C, 3,5 mm para USB Type-C, adaptador USB OTG, fones USB Type-C, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, IP68 certified, pressure sensitive frame, SAR values: Head - 1.39 W/kg, Body - 1.40 W/kg, fanless
peso
184 g, Suprimento de energia: 75 g
Preço
949 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Google Pixel 3 XL
Google Pixel 3 XL
Google Pixel 3 XL
Google Pixel 3 XL
Google Pixel 3 XL
Google Pixel 3 XL
Google Pixel 3 XL
Google Pixel 3 XL

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼96% +3%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 (min: 315, max: 645) MBit/s ∼94%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s ∼92% -2%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 (min: 532, max: 642) MBit/s ∼91% -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 100, max: 534) MBit/s ∼73% -23%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
239 MBit/s ∼35% -62%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=303)
210 MBit/s ∼31% -67%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
696 (min: 647, max: 714) MBit/s ∼100% +53%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 289, max: 805) MBit/s ∼95% +45%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 MBit/s ∼93% +42%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s ∼86% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼75% +14%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
456 (min: 429, max: 468) MBit/s ∼66%
Google Pixel 2 XL
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
279 MBit/s ∼40% -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=303)
205 MBit/s ∼29% -55%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø634 (618-645)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø456 (429-468)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 XL - Overview
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 XL - Overview
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 XL - Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 XL - Cycling through a grove
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 XL - Bridge
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 XL - Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Low-light shot without Night Sight
Low-light shot without Night Sight
Low-light shot with Night Sight
Low-light shot with Night Sight
418
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
410
cd/m²
410
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
407
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 419 cd/m² Médio: 413 cd/m² Minimum: 2.3 cd/m²
iluminação: 97 %
iluminação com acumulador: 410 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.16 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.219
Google Pixel 3 XL
AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8
Google Pixel 2 XL
P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Screen
34%
17%
29%
1%
-11%
Brightness middle
410
656
60%
565
38%
576
40%
477
16%
415
1%
Brightness
413
659
60%
571
38%
582
41%
453
10%
420
2%
Brightness Distribution
97
88
-9%
96
-1%
90
-7%
86
-11%
87
-10%
Black Level *
0.33
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.16
1.7
46%
2.3
27%
1.3
59%
2.1
34%
2.7
15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.5
2.8
49%
4.8
13%
3.5
36%
8.2
-49%
4.3
22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
1.7
-0%
1.9
-12%
1.6
6%
1.6
6%
3.3
-94%
Gamma
2.219 99%
1.998 110%
2.16 102%
2.18 101%
2.28 96%
2.36 93%
CCT
6653 98%
6487 100%
6332 103%
6561 99%
6425 101%
6787 96%
Contrast
1445

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8943 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
10876 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6202 Points ∼43% -43%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
8938 Points ∼62% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
14417 Points ∼100% +33%
Google Pixel 2 XL
7568 Points ∼52% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=19)
13635 Points ∼95% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=197)
4524 Points ∼31% -58%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
8292 Points ∼74%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
11244 Points ∼100% +36%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
8963 Points ∼80% +8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
10024 Points ∼89% +21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8522 Points ∼76% +3%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6253 Points ∼56% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=21)
8655 Points ∼77% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=247)
4308 Points ∼38% -48%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
2325 Points ∼49%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4774 Points ∼100% +105%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3776 Points ∼79% +62%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
3378 Points ∼71% +45%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2457 Points ∼51% +6%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1916 Points ∼40% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=21)
2417 Points ∼51% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=248)
1270 Points ∼27% -45%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
9029 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5319 Points ∼58% -41%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
9225 Points ∼100% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8178 Points ∼89% -9%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6994 Points ∼76% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8326 - 9868, n=22)
8018 Points ∼87% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=255)
4555 Points ∼49% -50%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
11180 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5822 Points ∼46% -48%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
12535 Points ∼100% +12%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
9858 Points ∼79% -12%
Google Pixel 2 XL
8258 Points ∼66% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=20)
10123 Points ∼81% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=423)
4958 Points ∼40% -56%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
3676 Points ∼84%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2723 Points ∼62% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2546 Points ∼58% -31%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4364 Points ∼100% +19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2713 Points ∼62% -26%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3035 Points ∼70% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2223 - 3764, n=22)
3110 Points ∼71% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (2293 - 4439, n=277)
1709 Points ∼39% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
5789 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4828 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3792 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4250 Points ∼73% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5651 Points ∼98% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4405 Points ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4209 - 8206, n=22)
5494 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=277)
1465 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
5133 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4121 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3420 Points ∼67% -33%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4275 Points ∼83% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4555 Points ∼89% -11%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4003 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3512 - 5189, n=22)
4646 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1010 - 5189, n=280)
1360 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
3280 Points ∼74%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2961 Points ∼67% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2561 Points ∼58% -22%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4407 Points ∼100% +34%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2721 Points ∼62% -17%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2994 Points ∼68% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2110 - 3763, n=21)
3081 Points ∼70% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=292)
1689 Points ∼38% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
8380 Points ∼81%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
10374 Points ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4797 Points ∼46% -43%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5854 Points ∼56% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
7609 Points ∼73% -9%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6282 Points ∼61% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5228 - 8451, n=21)
7720 Points ∼74% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=292)
2068 Points ∼20% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
6228 Points ∼93%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
6667 Points ∼100% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4018 Points ∼60% -35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5456 Points ∼82% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5438 Points ∼82% -13%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5050 Points ∼76% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4054 - 6568, n=21)
5771 Points ∼87% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=293)
1734 Points ∼26% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
3605 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3027 Points ∼72% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2469 Points ∼59% -32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4183 Points ∼100% +16%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3620 Points ∼87% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3028 Points ∼72% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=21)
3268 Points ∼78% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼39% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
5089 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3726 Points ∼72% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3582 Points ∼69% -30%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4206 Points ∼81% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5190 Points ∼100% +2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3872 Points ∼75% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5241, n=21)
4944 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
4662 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3544 Points ∼75% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3256 Points ∼69% -30%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4201 Points ∼89% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4734 Points ∼100% +2%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3646 Points ∼77% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=21)
4424 Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
3594 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2713 Points ∼65% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2496 Points ∼60% -31%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4150 Points ∼100% +15%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2541 Points ∼61% -29%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2995 Points ∼72% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3668, n=21)
3129 Points ∼75% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=384)
1540 Points ∼37% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
7780 Points ∼95%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
7055 Points ∼86% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4637 Points ∼56% -40%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5305 Points ∼65% -32%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8219 Points ∼100% +6%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5856 Points ∼71% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=21)
7818 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=384)
1632 Points ∼20% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
6180 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
5205 Points ∼84% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3895 Points ∼63% -37%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4996 Points ∼81% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5492 Points ∼89% -11%
Google Pixel 2 XL
4831 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4529 - 6454, n=21)
5843 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=392)
1387 Points ∼22% -78%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
15614 Points ∼42%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
27717 Points ∼75% +78%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
26226 Points ∼71% +68%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
36755 Points ∼100% +135%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
36762 Points ∼100% +135%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20233 Points ∼55% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=21)
33400 Points ∼91% +114%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=539)
12880 Points ∼35% -18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
53794 Points ∼34%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
159735 Points ∼100% +197%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
46610 Points ∼29% -13%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
67730 Points ∼42% +26%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
81502 Points ∼51% +52%
Google Pixel 2 XL
54156 Points ∼34% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 84998, n=21)
80111 Points ∼50% +49%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=539)
17994 Points ∼11% -67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
34855 Points ∼45%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
77599 Points ∼100% +123%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
39745 Points ∼51% +14%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
57047 Points ∼74% +64%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
64152 Points ∼83% +84%
Google Pixel 2 XL
39456 Points ∼51% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=21)
60990 Points ∼79% +75%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=540)
15114 Points ∼19% -57%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
140 fps ∼62%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
226 fps ∼100% +61%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
147 fps ∼65% +5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
120 fps ∼53% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
150 fps ∼66% +7%
Google Pixel 2 XL
112 fps ∼50% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=22)
144 fps ∼64% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=564)
31.4 fps ∼14% -78%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
60 fps ∼96%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
61 fps ∼97% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼94% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=21)
62.7 fps ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=567)
25 fps ∼40% -58%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
56 fps ∼52%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
107 fps ∼100% +91%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
74 fps ∼69% +32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
73 fps ∼68% +30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
71 fps ∼66% +27%
Google Pixel 2 XL
59 fps ∼55% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=21)
73 fps ∼68% +30%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=486)
16.8 fps ∼16% -70%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
37 fps ∼63%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
59 fps ∼100% +59%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
45 fps ∼76% +22%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
42 fps ∼71% +14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼98% +57%
Google Pixel 2 XL
35 fps ∼59% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 75, n=21)
55 fps ∼93% +49%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=489)
16 fps ∼27% -57%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
45 fps ∼65%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
69.3 fps ∼100% +54%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
47 fps ∼68% +4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
29 fps ∼42% -36%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼84% +29%
Google Pixel 2 XL
41 fps ∼59% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=22)
54.4 fps ∼78% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼21% -68%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
25 fps ∼42%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
58.9 fps ∼100% +136%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
24 fps ∼41% -4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
26 fps ∼44% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
56 fps ∼95% +124%
Google Pixel 2 XL
20 fps ∼34% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 59, n=21)
46.5 fps ∼79% +86%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼24% -44%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone Xs Max
32.1 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
19 fps ∼59%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
25 fps ∼78%
Google Pixel 2 XL
9.5 fps ∼30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 25, n=10)
19.8 fps ∼62%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=62)
10.2 fps ∼32%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone Xs Max
16.3 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
13 fps ∼80%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
14 fps ∼86%
Google Pixel 2 XL
9.9 fps ∼61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (11 - 31, n=10)
15.4 fps ∼94%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=62)
6.49 fps ∼40%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone Xs Max
47 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
18 fps ∼38%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
40 fps ∼85%
Google Pixel 2 XL
16 fps ∼34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (20 - 40, n=10)
28.5 fps ∼61%
Average of class Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=62)
14.4 fps ∼31%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Apple iPhone Xs Max
36.8 fps ∼97%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
33 fps ∼87%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
38 fps ∼100%
Google Pixel 2 XL
26 fps ∼68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (29 - 38, n=9)
35 fps ∼92%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 63, n=61)
15.7 fps ∼41%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
33 fps ∼83%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
40 fps ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
28 fps ∼70% -15%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
31 fps ∼78% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
35 fps ∼88% +6%
Google Pixel 2 XL
24 fps ∼60% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=21)
34 fps ∼85% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼25% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
18 fps ∼49%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
31 fps ∼84% +72%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
14 fps ∼38% -22%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
16 fps ∼43% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
37 fps ∼100% +106%
Google Pixel 2 XL
13 fps ∼35% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (17 - 37, n=21)
28.3 fps ∼76% +57%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼24% -51%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
285269 Points ∼94%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
302955 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
250577 Points ∼83% -12%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
300617 Points ∼99% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
246366 Points ∼81% -14%
Google Pixel 2 XL
204654 Points ∼68% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=22)
275958 Points ∼91% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=170)
118332 Points ∼39% -59%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
215632 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
222290 Points ∼89% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
250848 Points ∼100% +16%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
226124 Points ∼90% +5%
Google Pixel 2 XL
166151 Points ∼66% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=18)
223967 Points ∼89% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=387)
75990 Points ∼30% -65%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
1176 Points ∼68%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
1731 Points ∼100% +47%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1109 Points ∼64% -6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
1424 Points ∼82% +21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
1400 Points ∼81% +19%
Google Pixel 2 XL
1186 Points ∼69% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=20)
1348 Points ∼78% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=499)
698 Points ∼40% -41%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
7989 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
15659 Points ∼100% +96%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6370 Points ∼41% -20%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
6273 Points ∼40% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
7743 Points ∼49% -3%
Google Pixel 2 XL
6142 Points ∼39% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=20)
7816 Points ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=499)
1737 Points ∼11% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
2825 Points ∼45%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
1815 Points ∼29% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2625 Points ∼42% -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
6283 Points ∼100% +122%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3704 Points ∼59% +31%
Google Pixel 2 XL
2927 Points ∼47% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=20)
3594 Points ∼57% +27%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=499)
1244 Points ∼20% -56%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
4417 Points ∼38%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
11675 Points ∼100% +164%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6413 Points ∼55% +45%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
8604 Points ∼74% +95%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8418 Points ∼72% +91%
Google Pixel 2 XL
5914 Points ∼51% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4417 - 8613, n=20)
7657 Points ∼66% +73%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=499)
2512 Points ∼22% -43%
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3 XL
3291 Points ∼67%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4895 Points ∼100% +49%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3302 Points ∼67% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4687 Points ∼96% +42%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4288 Points ∼88% +30%
Google Pixel 2 XL
3351 Points ∼68% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3291 - 4693, n=20)
4099 Points ∼84% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=503)
1255 Points ∼26% -62%

Legend

 
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
273.01 Points ∼100% +260%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
109.18 Points ∼40% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=22)
76.9 Points ∼28% +1%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
75.8 Points ∼28%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
71.172 Points ∼26% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.59 Points ∼25% -8%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
64.709 Points ∼24% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=422)
36.7 Points ∼13% -52%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points ∼100% +166%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
23285 Points ∼54% +43%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
16228 Points ∼38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=22)
15431 Points ∼36% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points ∼34% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
13360 Points ∼31% -18%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
11308 Points ∼26% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=557)
5556 Points ∼13% -66%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=578)
11474 ms * ∼100% -312%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
3434.1 ms * ∼30% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
3179 ms * ∼28% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=22)
2874 ms * ∼25% -3%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
2785 ms * ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2059.7 ms * ∼18% +26%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
1951.9 ms * ∼17% +30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603.1 ms * ∼5% +78%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points ∼100% +55%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
124 Points ∼80% +24%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
100 Points ∼65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=15)
84.5 Points ∼55% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
75 Points ∼48% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
64 Points ∼41% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=63)
63.6 Points ∼41% -36%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
347 Points ∼100% +21%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
334 Points ∼96% +16%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
287 Points ∼83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (260 - 291, n=21)
233 Points ∼67% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
211 Points ∼61% -26%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)
194 Points ∼56% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points ∼47% -43%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 362, n=284)
111 Points ∼32% -61%

* ... smaller is better

Google Pixel 3 XLSamsung Galaxy S9 PlusHuawei Mate 20 ProSony Xperia XZ2 PremiumGoogle Pixel 2 XLAverage 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
18%
-20%
-10%
-13%
-71%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
72.38 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
30.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
50.2 (17.1 - 71.9, n=25)
45.5 (3.4 - 87.1, n=317)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.18 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
34.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.4 (18 - 86.6, n=25)
63.7 (8.2 - 96.5, n=317)
Random Write 4KB
132.7
22.74
-83%
157.84
19%
21.75
-84%
17.84
-87%
50.5 (8.77 - 156, n=34)
-62%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=607)
-88%
Random Read 4KB
120.8
129.68
7%
157.42
30%
135.99
13%
170.55
41%
134 (78.2 - 173, n=34)
11%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=607)
-68%
Sequential Write 256KB
228.6
204.94
-10%
196.39
-14%
170.98
-25%
195.26
-15%
193 (133 - 229, n=34)
-16%
79.9 (2.99 - 246, n=607)
-65%
Sequential Read 256KB
632.6
818.69
29%
853.28
35%
748.59
18%
760.14
20%
727 (529 - 895, n=34)
15%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=607)
-64%
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min60 fps
 high HD60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Shadow Fight 3
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 high60 fps
 minimal60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 40.9 °C38.3 °C36.9 °C 
 41.9 °C38.3 °C37.4 °C 
 42 °C38.9 °C36.5 °C 
Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 39 °C
35.1 °C37.8 °C39.8 °C
35.7 °C37.9 °C39.9 °C
36.4 °C38.4 °C39.8 °C
Máximo: 39.9 °C
Médio: 37.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.435.533.72537.834.934.33141.139.539.14038.238.641.45040.73943.263342830.68032.829.731.610031.728.529.312529.824.732.31603923.745.720051.622.558.425054.32161.131556.720.862.840060.119.968.35005720.169.163050.51968.18005118.572100050.719.271.6125053.91975160053.218.172.7200054.71871.4250056.217.468.7315061.717.670.8400061.217.870.9500055.21869.3630055.31871.1800055.41871.61000062.21879.51250054.91873.11600045.41866.7SPL69.464.130.684.2N25.917.21.562.8median 54.7median 18.5median 69.3Delta3.426.335.246.432.941.937.237.731.736.839.640.528.330.327.330.326.928.126.732.2244520.952.120.957.119.558.518.562.617.570.917.574.715.778.515.876.916.676.215.873.415.473.615.575.51679.915.880.11676.516.37416.374.916.271.416.458.216.44228.688.41.176.2median 16.4median 73.42.110.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 3 XLGoogle Pixel 2 XL
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 3 XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.4 / 2 Watt
Carga midlight 4.8 / 9.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Google Pixel 3 XL
3430 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
1%
26%
-12%
-13%
-15%
-8%
1%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
1
-43%
0.68
3%
0.95
-36%
0.67
4%
1.28
-83%
0.802 (0.42 - 1.8, n=19)
-15%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=635)
-26%
Idle Average *
1.4
1.4
-0%
0.95
32%
2.17
-55%
2.5
-79%
1.87
-34%
1.722 (0.67 - 2.9, n=19)
-23%
1.721 (0.6 - 6.2, n=634)
-23%
Idle Maximum *
2
1.7
15%
1.09
45%
2.25
-13%
2.51
-26%
1.89
5%
2.1 (0.87 - 3.5, n=19)
-5%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=635)
-0%
Load Average *
4.8
4.6
4%
4.58
5%
4.47
7%
4.3
10%
3.73
22%
4.79 (3.64 - 7.2, n=19)
-0%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=629)
16%
Load Maximum *
9.5
6.7
29%
5.16
46%
6.15
35%
6.87
28%
8.08
15%
9.2 (6.2 - 12.3, n=19)
3%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=629)
39%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
28h 45min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 04min
Carga (máximo brilho)
4h 59min
Google Pixel 3 XL
3430 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Google Pixel 2 XL
3520 mAh
Battery Runtime
-8%
-19%
6%
-23%
-6%
Reader / Idle
1725
1305
-24%
1343
-22%
1747
1%
1347
-22%
1706
-1%
H.264
724
801
11%
674
-7%
854
18%
520
-28%
672
-7%
WiFi v1.3
691
742
7%
521
-25%
767
11%
547
-21%
581
-16%
Load
299
223
-25%
237
-21%
282
-6%
235
-21%
302
1%

Pro

+ Carcaça sólida e estável
+ Boas câmeras
+ Diversas bandas LTE
+ Recursos de software exclusivos
+ Muitos acessórios
+ Tela de cores precisas
+ Sem afogamento sob carga contínua
+ Alto-falantes impressionantes
+ Boa duração da bateria

Contra

- Sem desbloqueio facial
- Faltam alguns recursos de vídeo modernos
- Caro
- Entalhe grande
- Qualidade medíocre de chamadas para um carro chefe
- GPS inexato
The Google Pixel 3 XL Smartphone Review
The Google Pixel 3 XL Smartphone Review

Se você não gosta de entalhes, pode parar de ler agora. O Google Pixel 3 XL tem um nível enorme, que já está um passo atrás de alguns de seus concorrentes que têm entalhes menos obstrutivos, sensores de digitais na tela e até mesmo uma câmera frontal deslizante para maximizar suas relações de tela a corpo.

A câmera traseira do Google Pixel 3 XL tira fotos incríveis, mas seus recursos de vídeo estão desatualizados. Além disso, as câmeras frontais duplas são úteis, mas somente se você tirar selfies regularmente. Os recursos de RA e Digital Wellbeing também são novos, mas eles já estavam disponíveis com aplicativos de terceiros, portanto não são exatamente inovadores.

O Google Pixel 3 XL é muito caro pelo preço total para nos convencer de seus muitos excelentes recursos. Simplesmente não faz nada para se destacar da multidão.

O que resta com o Google Pixel 3 XL, é um smartphone elegante e bem construído que faz muitas coisas bem e poucas coisas mal. Infelizmente, não faz nada para se destacar de um mercado já saturado. A Google está otimista em cobrar até $999 pela versão de 128 GB. Recomendamos que você confira o Pixel 3 XL se puder comprá-lo abaixo do preço de varejo, já que é um ótimo smartphone com câmeras e alto-falantes de primeira classe.

Google Pixel 3 XL - 11/24/2018 v6
Florian Schmitt

Acabamento
92%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
97%
Conectividade
42 / 60 → 70%
Peso
89%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
89%
Desempenho do jogos
67 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
74 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
89%
Ruído
100%
Audio
81 / 91 → 89%
Camera
85%
Médio
82%
90%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Google Pixel 3 XL
Florian Schmitt, 2018-11-28 (Update: 2018-11-28)