Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Google Pixel 3

Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 11/28/2018

No flagship. O Google Pixel 3 é um smartphone caro, que é vendido por US$ 799 (£ 739). No entanto, deve competir contra concorrentes similarmente equipados, mas consideravelmente mais baratos. Descubra em nossa análise se a Google corrigiu os problemas que tivemos com o Pixel 2 e como o novo carro-chefe da empresa se sai contra seus concorrentes.

Google Pixel 3 (Pixel Serie)
Placa gráfica
Memória
4096 MB 
Pantalha
5.5 polegadas 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 439 PPI, Capacitiva, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 52 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, Conexões Audio: USB Type-C, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, Barômetro, Giroscópio, Magnetômetro, USB Type-C, eSIM
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1900 MHz. CDMA: BC0, BC1, BC10. WCDMA: W1, W2. LTE/FDD: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B13, B17, B18, B19, B20, B25, B26, B28, B29, B32, B66, B71. LTE TD: B38, B39, B40, B41, B42, B46., LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.9 x 145.6 x 68.2
Bateria
2915 mAh Lítio-Ion, Carregamento Qi wireless
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix ,1.4μm, f/1.8
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix Dual: 8MP (f/2.2) & 8MP (f/1.8)
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Teclado: Virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Quick charger, USB Type-C cable, Pixel USB Type-C Headphones, USB Type-C to 3.5mm jack adapter, USB Type-C to Type-A adapter, SIM tool, 24 Meses Garantia, SAR values: Head - 1.33 W/kg, Body - 1.49 W/kg, fanless
peso
148 g, Suprimento de energia: 82 g
Preço
850 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Google Pixel 3
Google Pixel 3
Google Pixel 3
Google Pixel 3
Google Pixel 3
Google Pixel 3

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
659 (min: 610, max: 698) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
650 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
624 (min: 593, max: 636) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=303)
210 MBit/s ∼32% -68%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
591 (min: 461, max: 651) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone XS
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
587 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
573 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
484 (min: 382, max: 499) MBit/s ∼82% -18%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
437 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=303)
205 MBit/s ∼35% -65%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø658 (610-698)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø591 (461-651)
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 - Overview
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 - Overview
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 - Loop
GPS test: Google Pixel 3 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
383
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
394
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 420 cd/m² Médio: 398.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.46 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 393 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
Google Pixel 3
OLED, 2160x1080, 5.5
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
Apple iPhone XS
OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Sony Xperia XZ3
OLED, 2880x1440, 6
HTC U12 Plus
Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6
Screen
14%
14%
-155%
-7%
Brightness middle
393
569
45%
639
63%
543
38%
395
1%
Brightness
398
578
45%
637
60%
542
36%
402
1%
Brightness Distribution
91
95
4%
94
3%
92
1%
90
-1%
Black Level *
0.37
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.4
1.3
7%
1
29%
6.6
-371%
1.6
-14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.5
2.1
16%
2.2
12%
11
-340%
3.4
-36%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.2
1.6
-33%
2.2
-83%
4.7
-292%
1.1
8%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.31 95%
1.9 116%
1.835 120%
2.14 103%
CCT
6597 99%
6401 102%
6364 102%
6817 95%
6536 99%
Contrast
1068

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 245.1 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 245.1 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 245.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8943 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (41 ms).
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
13620 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
8025 Points ∼59% -41%
Sony Xperia XZ3
13194 Points ∼97% -3%
HTC U12 Plus
12493 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=19)
13635 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=197)
4524 Points ∼33% -67%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
7754 Points ∼67%
Huawei P20 Pro
6756 Points ∼58% -13%
Apple iPhone XS
11598 Points ∼100% +50%
Sony Xperia XZ3
7934 Points ∼68% +2%
HTC U12 Plus
8812 Points ∼76% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=21)
8655 Points ∼75% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=247)
4308 Points ∼37% -44%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
2355 Points ∼49%
Huawei P20 Pro
1922 Points ∼40% -18%
Apple iPhone XS
4824 Points ∼100% +105%
Sony Xperia XZ3
2272 Points ∼47% -4%
HTC U12 Plus
2429 Points ∼50% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=21)
2417 Points ∼50% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=248)
1270 Points ∼26% -46%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
9063 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
6982 Points ∼77% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ3
Points ∼0% -100%
HTC U12 Plus
8601 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8326 - 9868, n=22)
8018 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=255)
4555 Points ∼50% -50%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
11744 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
8115 Points ∼69% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ3
11474 Points ∼98% -2%
HTC U12 Plus
10264 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=20)
10123 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=423)
4958 Points ∼42% -58%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
2979 Points ∼79%
Huawei P20 Pro
2942 Points ∼78% -1%
Apple iPhone XS
2998 Points ∼80% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3764 Points ∼100% +26%
HTC U12 Plus
2947 Points ∼78% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2223 - 3764, n=22)
3110 Points ∼83% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2293 - 4439, n=277)
1709 Points ∼45% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
4882 Points ∼84%
Huawei P20 Pro
3109 Points ∼54% -36%
Apple iPhone XS
5139 Points ∼88% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ3
5810 Points ∼100% +19%
HTC U12 Plus
4450 Points ∼77% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4209 - 8206, n=22)
5494 Points ∼95% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=277)
1465 Points ∼25% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
4275 Points ∼82%
Huawei P20 Pro
3070 Points ∼59% -28%
Apple iPhone XS
4436 Points ∼86% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ3
5184 Points ∼100% +21%
HTC U12 Plus
3997 Points ∼77% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3512 - 5189, n=22)
4646 Points ∼90% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (1010 - 5189, n=280)
1360 Points ∼26% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
2781 Points ∼76%
Huawei P20 Pro
2940 Points ∼80% +6%
Apple iPhone XS
2952 Points ∼80% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3672 Points ∼100% +32%
HTC U12 Plus
2656 Points ∼72% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2110 - 3763, n=21)
3081 Points ∼84% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=292)
1689 Points ∼46% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
6404 Points ∼43%
Huawei P20 Pro
3503 Points ∼23% -45%
Apple iPhone XS
14951 Points ∼100% +133%
Sony Xperia XZ3
8369 Points ∼56% +31%
HTC U12 Plus
6419 Points ∼43% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5228 - 8451, n=21)
7720 Points ∼52% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=292)
2068 Points ∼14% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
4966 Points ∼63%
Huawei P20 Pro
3360 Points ∼43% -32%
Apple iPhone XS
7856 Points ∼100% +58%
Sony Xperia XZ3
6517 Points ∼83% +31%
HTC U12 Plus
4882 Points ∼62% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4054 - 6568, n=21)
5771 Points ∼73% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=293)
1734 Points ∼22% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
3203 Points ∼86%
Huawei P20 Pro
2926 Points ∼79% -9%
Apple iPhone XS
2960 Points ∼80% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3703 Points ∼100% +16%
HTC U12 Plus
3197 Points ∼86% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=21)
3268 Points ∼88% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼44% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
5188 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
3017 Points ∼58% -42%
Apple iPhone XS
3712 Points ∼72% -28%
Sony Xperia XZ3
5092 Points ∼98% -2%
HTC U12 Plus
3488 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5241, n=21)
4944 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
4560 Points ∼97%
Huawei P20 Pro
2996 Points ∼64% -34%
Apple iPhone XS
3514 Points ∼75% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ3
4700 Points ∼100% +3%
HTC U12 Plus
3419 Points ∼73% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=21)
4424 Points ∼94% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼24% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
2533 Points ∼70%
Huawei P20 Pro
2885 Points ∼80% +14%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3603 Points ∼100% +42%
HTC U12 Plus
2774 Points ∼77% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3668, n=21)
3129 Points ∼87% +24%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=384)
1540 Points ∼43% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
7075 Points ∼88%
Huawei P20 Pro
3335 Points ∼42% -53%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia XZ3
8014 Points ∼100% +13%
HTC U12 Plus
5637 Points ∼70% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=21)
7818 Points ∼98% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=384)
1632 Points ∼20% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
5059 Points ∼80%
Huawei P20 Pro
3223 Points ∼51% -36%
Apple iPhone XS
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia XZ3
6300 Points ∼100% +25%
HTC U12 Plus
4585 Points ∼73% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4529 - 6454, n=21)
5843 Points ∼93% +15%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=392)
1387 Points ∼22% -73%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
32914 Points ∼89%
Huawei P20 Pro
22441 Points ∼61% -32%
Apple iPhone XS
27400 Points ∼74% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ3
36794 Points ∼100% +12%
HTC U12 Plus
33810 Points ∼92% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=21)
33400 Points ∼91% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=539)
12880 Points ∼35% -61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
84256 Points ∼53%
Huawei P20 Pro
33472 Points ∼21% -60%
Apple iPhone XS
160199 Points ∼100% +90%
Sony Xperia XZ3
83927 Points ∼52% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
81726 Points ∼51% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 84998, n=21)
80111 Points ∼50% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=539)
17994 Points ∼11% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
62568 Points ∼81%
Huawei P20 Pro
30176 Points ∼39% -52%
Apple iPhone XS
77128 Points ∼100% +23%
Sony Xperia XZ3
65330 Points ∼85% +4%
HTC U12 Plus
62152 Points ∼81% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=21)
60990 Points ∼79% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=540)
15114 Points ∼20% -76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
127 fps ∼51%
Huawei P20 Pro
121 fps ∼48% -5%
Apple iPhone XS
251 fps ∼100% +98%
Sony Xperia XZ3
152 fps ∼61% +20%
HTC U12 Plus
98 fps ∼39% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=22)
144 fps ∼57% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=564)
31.4 fps ∼13% -75%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
61 fps ∼97%
Huawei P20 Pro
60 fps ∼96% -2%
Apple iPhone XS
60 fps ∼96% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ3
60 fps ∼96% -2%
HTC U12 Plus
59 fps ∼94% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=21)
62.7 fps ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=567)
25 fps ∼40% -59%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
55 fps ∼48%
Huawei P20 Pro
61 fps ∼53% +11%
Apple iPhone XS
115 fps ∼100% +109%
Sony Xperia XZ3
83 fps ∼72% +51%
HTC U12 Plus
72 fps ∼63% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=21)
73 fps ∼63% +33%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=486)
16.8 fps ∼15% -69%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
54 fps ∼90%
Huawei P20 Pro
54 fps ∼90% 0%
Apple iPhone XS
60 fps ∼100% +11%
Sony Xperia XZ3
50 fps ∼83% -7%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼58% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 75, n=21)
55 fps ∼92% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=489)
16 fps ∼27% -70%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
46 fps ∼74%
Huawei P20 Pro
39 fps ∼63% -15%
Apple iPhone XS
62 fps ∼100% +35%
Sony Xperia XZ3
57 fps ∼92% +24%
HTC U12 Plus
39 fps ∼63% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=22)
54.4 fps ∼88% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼23% -69%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
41 fps ∼85%
Huawei P20 Pro
36 fps ∼75% -12%
Apple iPhone XS
48 fps ∼100% +17%
Sony Xperia XZ3
31 fps ∼65% -24%
HTC U12 Plus
31 fps ∼65% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 59, n=21)
46.5 fps ∼97% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼29% -66%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
23 fps ∼66%
Huawei P20 Pro
14 fps ∼40% -39%
Apple iPhone XS
35 fps ∼100% +52%
Sony Xperia XZ3
14 fps ∼40% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 25, n=10)
19.8 fps ∼57% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=62)
10.2 fps ∼29% -56%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
11 fps ∼50%
Huawei P20 Pro
8.6 fps ∼39% -22%
Apple iPhone XS
22 fps ∼100% +100%
Sony Xperia XZ3
14 fps ∼64% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (11 - 31, n=10)
15.4 fps ∼70% +40%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=62)
6.49 fps ∼30% -41%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
27 fps ∼66%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼56% -15%
Apple iPhone XS
41 fps ∼100% +52%
Sony Xperia XZ3
21 fps ∼51% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (20 - 40, n=10)
28.5 fps ∼70% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=62)
14.4 fps ∼35% -47%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
29 fps ∼60%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼48% -21%
Apple iPhone XS
48 fps ∼100% +66%
Sony Xperia XZ3
37 fps ∼77% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (29 - 38, n=9)
35 fps ∼73% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 63, n=61)
15.7 fps ∼33% -46%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
28 fps ∼74%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼61% -18%
Apple iPhone XS
38 fps ∼100% +36%
Sony Xperia XZ3
35 fps ∼92% +25%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼92% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=21)
34 fps ∼89% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼26% -65%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
26 fps ∼84%
Huawei P20 Pro
22 fps ∼71% -15%
Apple iPhone XS
31 fps ∼100% +19%
Sony Xperia XZ3
19 fps ∼61% -27%
HTC U12 Plus
20 fps ∼65% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (17 - 37, n=21)
28.3 fps ∼91% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼29% -66%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
280162 Points ∼80%
Huawei P20 Pro
207959 Points ∼60% -26%
Apple iPhone XS
348178 Points ∼100% +24%
Sony Xperia XZ3
292268 Points ∼84% +4%
HTC U12 Plus
255739 Points ∼73% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=22)
275958 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=170)
118332 Points ∼34% -58%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
220797 Points ∼97%
Huawei P20 Pro
179709 Points ∼79% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ3
226853 Points ∼100% +3%
HTC U12 Plus
221971 Points ∼98% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=18)
223967 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=387)
75990 Points ∼33% -66%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
1435 Points ∼84%
Huawei P20 Pro
1273 Points ∼74% -11%
Apple iPhone XS
1711 Points ∼100% +19%
Sony Xperia XZ3
1390 Points ∼81% -3%
HTC U12 Plus
1437 Points ∼84% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=20)
1348 Points ∼79% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=499)
698 Points ∼41% -51%
Graphics (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
7965 Points ∼50%
Huawei P20 Pro
3725 Points ∼23% -53%
Apple iPhone XS
15875 Points ∼100% +99%
Sony Xperia XZ3
7989 Points ∼50% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
7945 Points ∼50% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=20)
7816 Points ∼49% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=499)
1737 Points ∼11% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
4650 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
4050 Points ∼87% -13%
Apple iPhone XS
4169 Points ∼90% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ3
2317 Points ∼50% -50%
HTC U12 Plus
3641 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=20)
3594 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=499)
1244 Points ∼27% -73%
System (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
7826 Points ∼64%
Huawei P20 Pro
5965 Points ∼49% -24%
Apple iPhone XS
12202 Points ∼100% +56%
Sony Xperia XZ3
8135 Points ∼67% +4%
HTC U12 Plus
7862 Points ∼64% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4417 - 8613, n=20)
7657 Points ∼63% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=499)
2512 Points ∼21% -68%
Overall (sort by value)
Google Pixel 3
4516 Points ∼74%
Huawei P20 Pro
3271 Points ∼54% -28%
Apple iPhone XS
6097 Points ∼100% +35%
Sony Xperia XZ3
3804 Points ∼62% -16%
HTC U12 Plus
4252 Points ∼70% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3291 - 4693, n=20)
4099 Points ∼67% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=503)
1255 Points ∼21% -72%

Legend

 
Google Pixel 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone XS Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, Apple 512 GB (iPhone Xs)
 
Sony Xperia XZ3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
272.3 Points ∼100% +215%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
87.883 Points ∼32% +2%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
87.036 Points ∼32% +1%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)
86.331 Points ∼32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=22)
76.9 Points ∼28% -11%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
58.255 Points ∼21% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=422)
36.7 Points ∼13% -57%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
43280 Points ∼100% +163%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
16982 Points ∼39% +3%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)
16454 Points ∼38%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
16285 Points ∼38% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=22)
15431 Points ∼36% -6%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
11584 Points ∼27% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=557)
5556 Points ∼13% -66%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=578)
11474 ms * ∼100% -398%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
3852.2 ms * ∼34% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=22)
2874 ms * ∼25% -25%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
2409.6 ms * ∼21% -5%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)
2304.5 ms * ∼20%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
2295 ms * ∼20% -0%
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
609.1 ms * ∼5% +74%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0)
159 Points ∼100% +61%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
101 Points ∼64% +2%
Google Pixel 3 (Chrome 70)
99 Points ∼62%
Sony Xperia XZ3 (Chrome 70)
98 Points ∼62% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=15)
84.5 Points ∼53% -15%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
69 Points ∼43% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=63)
63.6 Points ∼40% -36%

* ... smaller is better

Google Pixel 3Huawei P20 ProSony Xperia XZ3HTC U12 PlusAverage 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
8%
-24%
-11%
-18%
-72%
Random Write 4KB
133.76
160.49
20%
22.22
-83%
104.24
-22%
50.5 (8.77 - 156, n=34)
-62%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=607)
-88%
Random Read 4KB
149.82
144.33
-4%
135.67
-9%
118.14
-21%
134 (78.2 - 173, n=34)
-11%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=607)
-74%
Sequential Write 256KB
181.81
196.69
8%
196.14
8%
195.82
8%
193 (133 - 229, n=34)
6%
79.9 (2.99 - 246, n=607)
-56%
Sequential Read 256KB
766.41
831.82
9%
680.98
-11%
709.11
-7%
727 (529 - 895, n=34)
-5%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=607)
-70%
Arena of Valor
010203040506070Tooltip
; min: Ø60.9 (60-61)
; high HD: Ø57 (47-61)
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040506070Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø60.9 (60-61)
; Standard / low: Ø30.2 (27-31)
Carga Máxima
 35.2 °C35.1 °C32.3 °C 
 35.4 °C35 °C32.3 °C 
 35.4 °C34.4 °C32 °C 
Máximo: 35.4 °C
Médio: 34.1 °C
31.6 °C31.4 °C34.2 °C
31 °C32.4 °C37 °C
30 °C33.3 °C35.5 °C
Máximo: 37 °C
Médio: 32.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  29.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.633.82528.926.53125.224.14026.120.45030.227.46326.919.68028.721.710029.120.812518.431.5160215220024.350.925017.459.231516.86240015.362.750015.665.663014.168.480015.273.1100014.173.1125014.673.7160014.673.6200014.272.4250013.873.431501475.6400014.667500014.470.6630014.676.3800014.474.81000014.871.41250014.660.31600014.763.3SPL2784.9N0.964.3median 14.6median 68.4Delta1.49.13030.130.123.529.328.426.92632.826.624.824.520.723.219.535.718.644.221.451.72552.617.454.516.255.418.458.215.461.713.56513.764.213.768.414.673.414.975.914.476.414.777.114.677.414.878.314.776.914.676.51575.614.966.915.159.614.951.827.287.30.967.5median 14.9median 651.411.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 3Apple iPhone XS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone XS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.02 / 0.41 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.21 / 2.01 / 2.05 Watt
Carga midlight 4.06 / 8.79 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Google Pixel 3
2915 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone XS
2658 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ3
3300 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
38%
25%
22%
-10%
5%
16%
Idle Minimum *
1.21
0.84
31%
0.95
21%
0.8
34%
0.77
36%
0.802 (0.42 - 1.8, n=19)
34%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=635)
27%
Idle Average *
2.01
1.54
23%
1.34
33%
1.2
40%
2.18
-8%
1.722 (0.67 - 2.9, n=19)
14%
1.721 (0.6 - 6.2, n=634)
14%
Idle Maximum *
2.05
1.57
23%
1.48
28%
1.5
27%
2.21
-8%
2.1 (0.87 - 3.5, n=19)
-2%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=635)
3%
Load Average *
4.06
2.47
39%
4
1%
4.8
-18%
6.25
-54%
4.79 (3.64 - 7.2, n=19)
-18%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=629)
1%
Load Maximum *
8.79
2.49
72%
5.13
42%
6.2
29%
10.16
-16%
9.2 (6.2 - 12.3, n=19)
-5%
5.75 (1.2 - 14.2, n=629)
35%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
22h 52min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7h 51min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 07min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 39min
Google Pixel 3
2915 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone XS
2658 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ3
3300 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Battery Runtime
52%
21%
-8%
6%
Reader / Idle
1372
1727
26%
1442
5%
1270
-7%
1452
6%
H.264
727
784
8%
745
2%
420
-42%
464
-36%
WiFi v1.3
471
744
58%
570
21%
419
-11%
507
8%
Load
159
345
117%
245
54%
202
27%
230
45%

Pro

+ Experiência pura do Android 9 Pie
+ USB 3.1 Tipo C
+ Bluetooth 5.0
+ Bom alto-falantes
+ Cobertura LTE mundial
+ Tela OLED

Contra

- Memória não expansível
- Duração da bateria medíocre
- Brilho máximo baixo
- Funcionalidade Active-Edge não personalizável
The Google Pixel 3 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Google Germany.
The Google Pixel 3 smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Google Germany.

O Google Pixel 3 é um sólido smartphone de gama alta. É caro e tem um design ultrapassado em nossa opinião, mas a sua ótima câmera traseira, experiência Android pura e alto-falantes estéreo são impressionantes. O Active Edge também é uma adição útil, embora sua falta de personalização limita sua utilidade e impede que seja um ponto de venda exclusivo.

O Pixel 3 faz muitas coisas bem. No entanto, o dispositivo não possui recursos de destaque suficientes para justificar um preço de $800, particularmente porque muitos de seus concorrentes oferecem mais por menos. 

Além disso, o dispositivo tem uma tela comparativamente escura e sua duração de bateria é decepcionante. Esperamos que a Google melhore isso em futuras atualizações, porque isso prejudica o que seria um carro-chefe sólido. O Pixel 3 não faz muito para se destacar da concorrência, mas fica mais visível. Recomendamos o Pixel 3 para aqueles que querem a mais pura experiência Android que o dinheiro pode comprar, atualizações frequentes, uma câmara traseira líder na sua classe e excelentes alto-falantes.

Google Pixel 3 - 11/21/2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Acabamento
89%
Teclado
66 / 75 → 88%
Mouse
95%
Conectividade
42 / 60 → 70%
Peso
93%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
91%
Desempenho do jogos
67 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
77 / 70 → 100%
Temperatura
92%
Ruído
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 83%
Camera
83%
Médio
82%
90%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Google Pixel 3
Mike Wobker, 2018-11-28 (Update: 2018-11-28)