Notebookcheck

Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 8A

Stefan Schomberg, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Stefanie Voigt (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), 05/30/2019

Nenhum filhinho de mamãe. Tela grande com um entalhe de gota, design elegante, processador eficiente e uma câmera sensível à luz são os pros do Honor 8A, de acordo com o fabricante. Considerando o preço baixo do aparelho, parece quase bom demais para ser verdade, não é mesmo?

Honor 8A (8 Serie)
Processador
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
Placa gráfica
PowerVR GE8320
Memória
2048 MB 
Pantalha
6.09 polegadas 19.5:9, 1520 x 720 pixel 276 PPI, Capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 17 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD (até 512 GB, FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: Acelerômetro, sensor de proximidade
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850, 900, 1,800, 1,900), UMTS (850, 900, 1,900, 2,100), LTE, 3 (1,800 MHz), 20 (800 MHz), 1 (2,100 MHz), 5 (850 MHz), 8 (900 MHz), 38 (2,600 MHz), 40 (2,300 MHz), 41 (2,600 MHz), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 8 x 156.28 x 73.5
Bateria
3020 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.8
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 1, Teclado: virtual, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Ferramenta SIM, cabo USB, fonte de alimentação, 24 Meses Garantia, head SAR: 0.43 W/kg, body SAR: 1.01 W/kg, fanless
peso
150 g, Suprimento de energia: 25 g
Preço
159 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Honor 8A
Honor 8A

Size Comparison

158.7 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 180 g157.2 mm 76 mm 7.98 mm 167 g156.28 mm 73.5 mm 8 mm 150 g156.28 mm 73.5 mm 8 mm 150 g153.6 mm 73.1 mm 8.5 mm 160 g152.4 mm 73 mm 7.8 mm 150 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=397)
220 MBit/s ∼100% +233%
Huawei Y6 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
69 (min: 61, max: 66) MBit/s ∼31% +5%
Honor 8A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash
66 (min: 58, max: 65) MBit/s ∼30%
Wiko View 2 Go
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.7 (min: 53, max: 57) MBit/s ∼25% -17%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.4 (min: 49, max: 54) MBit/s ∼23% -22%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45 MBit/s ∼20% -32%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=397)
210 MBit/s ∼100% +469%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Adreno 506, 632, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.4 (min: 52, max: 61) MBit/s ∼26% +50%
Wiko View 2 Go
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53 (min: 36, max: 58) MBit/s ∼25% +44%
Honor 7A
Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.7 MBit/s ∼22% +27%
Huawei Y6 2019
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
37.8 (min: 29, max: 46) MBit/s ∼18% +2%
Honor 8A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 32 GB eMMC Flash
36.9 (min: 22, max: 52) MBit/s ∼18%
010203040506070Tooltip
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø61.8 (58-65)
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø51.1 (49-54)
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø64 (61-66)
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø54.6 (53-57)
Honor 8A Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø37.1 (22-52)
Xiaomi Redmi 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55.5 (52-61)
Huawei Y6 2019 Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø38 (29-46)
Wiko View 2 Go Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø53.2 (36-58)
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – city
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – city
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – city
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – city
Honor 8A - overview
Honor 8A - overview
Honor 8A - city
Honor 8A - city
Honor 8A - city
Honor 8A - city

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Honor 8A
Honor 8A
Testchart
Testchart
ColorChecker colors. Reference color in the bottom half of each square
Testchart zoomed-in
546
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
550
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
558
cd/m²
530
cd/m²
535
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 558 cd/m² Médio: 542.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.19 cd/m²
iluminação: 94 %
iluminação com acumulador: 522 cd/m²
Contraste: 1111:1 (Preto: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Honor 8A
IPS, 1520x720, 6.09
Honor 7A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Xiaomi Redmi 7
IPS, 1520x720, 6.26
Huawei Y6 2019
IPS LCD, 1560x720, 6.09
Wiko View 2 Go
IPS, 1512x720, 5.93
Screen
7%
2%
7%
7%
Brightness middle
522
417
-20%
444
-15%
487
-7%
465
-11%
Brightness
542
395
-27%
441
-19%
485
-11%
462
-15%
Brightness Distribution
94
88
-6%
90
-4%
89
-5%
84
-11%
Black Level *
0.47
0.18
62%
0.45
4%
0.35
26%
0.32
32%
Contrast
1111
2317
109%
987
-11%
1391
25%
1453
31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4
6.46
-62%
3.94
1%
4.3
-8%
4.76
-19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.5
10.72
-13%
6.72
29%
10.1
-6%
7.71
19%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.6
5.8
12%
4.8
27%
4.1
38%
4.6
30%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.423 91%
2.294 96%
2.09 105%
2.674 82%
CCT
7258 90%
7839 83%
7445 87%
7312 89%
6806 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9524 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 27.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (40.4 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2893 Points ∼64%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2127 Points ∼47% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
3850 Points ∼85% +33%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1607 Points ∼36% -44%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2461 Points ∼55% -15%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
2893 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=299)
4513 Points ∼100% +56%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3834 Points ∼86%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2820 Points ∼63% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
4301 Points ∼96% +12%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2354 Points ∼53% -39%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2542 Points ∼57% -34%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
3834 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=353)
4479 Points ∼100% +17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
855 Points ∼65%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
675 Points ∼51% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1227 Points ∼93% +44%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
832 Points ∼63% -3%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
674 Points ∼51% -21%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
855 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (758 - 4824, n=355)
1325 Points ∼100% +55%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4886 Points ∼83%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
3892 Points ∼66% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
5912 Points ∼100% +21%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
5511 Points ∼93% +13%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
3596 Points ∼61% -26%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
4886 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=349)
4937 Points ∼84% +1%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
4045 Points ∼57%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5109 Points ∼72% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7117 Points ∼100% +76%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4229 Points ∼59% +5%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4323 Points ∼61% +7%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
4045 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=517)
5401 Points ∼76% +34%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2079 Points ∼13%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
15735 Points ∼100% +657%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1740 Points ∼11% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
2079 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1849 - 15735, n=37)
2434 Points ∼15% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
355 Points ∼2%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14536 Points ∼100% +3995%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
203 Points ∼1% -43%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
355 Points ∼2% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (209 - 14536, n=37)
2303 Points ∼16% +549%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
435 Points ∼3%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14786 Points ∼100% +3299%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
253 Points ∼2% -42%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
435 Points ∼3% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (260 - 14786, n=40)
1997 Points ∼14% +359%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1021 Points ∼48%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1301 Points ∼61% +27%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2133 Points ∼100% +109%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
876 Points ∼41% -14%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1167 Points ∼55% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
1021 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=363)
1813 Points ∼85% +78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
432 Points ∼28%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
304 Points ∼20% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
469 Points ∼30% +9%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
197 Points ∼13% -54%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
305 Points ∼20% -29%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
432 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=363)
1548 Points ∼100% +258%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
496 Points ∼34%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
366 Points ∼25% -26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
567 Points ∼39% +14%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
238 Points ∼16% -52%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
365 Points ∼25% -26%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
496 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=366)
1445 Points ∼100% +191%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
961 Points ∼45%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1285 Points ∼60% +34%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2147 Points ∼100% +123%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
889 Points ∼41% -7%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1184 Points ∼55% +23%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
961 Points ∼45% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=377)
1782 Points ∼83% +85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
695 Points ∼33%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
530 Points ∼25% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
813 Points ∼38% +17%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
450 Points ∼21% -35%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
529 Points ∼25% -24%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
695 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=377)
2118 Points ∼100% +205%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
741 Points ∼41%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
610 Points ∼34% -18%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
943 Points ∼52% +27%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
505 Points ∼28% -32%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
603 Points ∼33% -19%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
741 Points ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7980, n=378)
1805 Points ∼100% +144%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
998 Points ∼47%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1232 Points ∼58% +23%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2119 Points ∼100% +112%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
898 Points ∼42% -10%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1103 Points ∼52% +11%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
998 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4262, n=439)
1740 Points ∼82% +74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
223 Points ∼17%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
254 Points ∼20% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
424 Points ∼33% +90%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
250 Points ∼20% +12%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
257 Points ∼20% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
223 Points ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=441)
1280 Points ∼100% +474%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
270 Points ∼22%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
308 Points ∼25% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
516 Points ∼42% +91%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
298 Points ∼24% +10%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
310 Points ∼25% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
270 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=449)
1225 Points ∼100% +354%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
997 Points ∼47%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1259 Points ∼59% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
2132 Points ∼100% +114%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
869 Points ∼41% -13%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1136 Points ∼53% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
997 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4240, n=471)
1645 Points ∼77% +65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
429 Points ∼25%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
535 Points ∼31% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
807 Points ∼47% +88%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
357 Points ∼21% -17%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
523 Points ∼30% +22%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
429 Points ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=471)
1735 Points ∼100% +304%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
491 Points ∼33%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
613 Points ∼41% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
936 Points ∼63% +91%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
411 Points ∼28% -16%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
594 Points ∼40% +21%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
491 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7673, n=479)
1491 Points ∼100% +204%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
10689 Points ∼68%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9249 Points ∼59% -13%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
15735 Points ∼100% +47%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14037 Points ∼89% +31%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
8971 Points ∼57% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
10689 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=631)
13525 Points ∼86% +27%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7061 Points ∼36%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9684 Points ∼50% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14536 Points ∼74% +106%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7567 Points ∼39% +7%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9686 Points ∼50% +37%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
7061 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3585 - 162695, n=631)
19546 Points ∼100% +177%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
7637 Points ∼47%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9584 Points ∼59% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14786 Points ∼91% +94%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
8431 Points ∼52% +10%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9517 Points ∼58% +25%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
7637 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4164 - 83518, n=632)
16333 Points ∼100% +114%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
19 fps ∼56%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
16 fps ∼47% -16%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
25 fps ∼73% +32%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
14 fps ∼41% -26%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
16 fps ∼47% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
19 fps ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=659)
34.1 fps ∼100% +79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
26 fps ∼70%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
27 fps ∼73% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
37 fps ∼100% +42%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
20 fps ∼54% -23%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
25 fps ∼68% -4%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
26 fps ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=662)
26.5 fps ∼72% +2%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
9.8 fps ∼52%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
7.1 fps ∼38% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
11 fps ∼59% +12%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
6.5 fps ∼35% -34%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
7.1 fps ∼38% -28%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
9.8 fps ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=578)
18.7 fps ∼100% +91%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
16 fps ∼84%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
14 fps ∼74% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
19 fps ∼100% +19%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
11 fps ∼58% -31%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
13 fps ∼68% -19%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
16 fps ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=583)
17.4 fps ∼92% +9%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
5.8 fps ∼37%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4.6 fps ∼30% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7 fps ∼45% +21%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.2 fps ∼27% -28%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.5 fps ∼16% -57%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
5.8 fps ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=440)
15.5 fps ∼100% +167%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
9.6 fps ∼65%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
10 fps ∼68% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
14 fps ∼95% +46%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
7.6 fps ∼51% -21%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
9.7 fps ∼66% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
9.6 fps ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=443)
14.8 fps ∼100% +54%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
0 fps ∼0%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
4.2 fps ∼48%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.7 fps ∼31%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.8 fps ∼32%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=143)
8.76 fps ∼100%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
0 fps ∼0%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1.3 fps ∼22%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
0.8 fps ∼13%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
0.88 fps ∼15%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=143)
5.99 fps ∼100%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
6.8 fps ∼52%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7 fps ∼54% +3%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2.3 fps ∼18% -66%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
4.7 fps ∼36% -31%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
6.8 fps ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=145)
13 fps ∼100% +91%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.8 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
3.9 fps ∼27% +3%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
4.2 fps ∼29% +11%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.6 fps ∼18% -32%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
3.8 fps ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=144)
14.4 fps ∼100% +279%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2.6 fps ∼25%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.6 fps ∼25% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
3.9 fps ∼38% +50%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
2 fps ∼19% -23%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
2.6 fps ∼25% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
2.6 fps ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=369)
10.4 fps ∼100% +300%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
3.8 fps ∼40%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5.4 fps ∼57% +42%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
7.8 fps ∼83% +105%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
3.1 fps ∼33% -18%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
5 fps ∼53% +32%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
3.8 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=373)
9.41 fps ∼100% +148%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.09 - 651, n=60)
25.9 fps ∼100%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.62 - 606, n=55)
23 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
fps ∼0%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
fps ∼0%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
0 fps ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 739, n=55)
27.6 fps ∼100%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
Points ∼0%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
59990 Points ∼47%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
102781 Points ∼81%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
64157 Points ∼50%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
56793 Points ∼45%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
0 Points ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 380913, n=260)
127050 Points ∼100%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
816 Points ∼76%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
705 Points ∼66% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1071 Points ∼100% +31%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
785 Points ∼73% -4%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
673 Points ∼63% -18%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
816 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=590)
734 Points ∼69% -10%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
792 Points ∼42%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
739 Points ∼39% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1072 Points ∼57% +35%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
470 Points ∼25% -41%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
741 Points ∼39% -6%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
792 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=590)
1889 Points ∼100% +139%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1366 Points ∼78%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1209 Points ∼69% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1758 Points ∼100% +29%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1458 Points ∼83% +7%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
884 Points ∼50% -35%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
1366 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6661, n=590)
1413 Points ∼80% +3%
System (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
2533 Points ∼62%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1962 Points ∼48% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
4090 Points ∼100% +61%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
1755 Points ∼43% -31%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1808 Points ∼44% -29%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
2533 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=590)
2799 Points ∼68% +11%
Overall (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
1223 Points ∼72%
Honor 7A
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
1055 Points ∼62% -14%
Xiaomi Redmi 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, Adreno 506, 3072
1695 Points ∼100% +39%
Huawei Y6 2019
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 2048
986 Points ∼58% -19%
Wiko View 2 Go
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Adreno 505, 3072
945 Points ∼56% -23%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
1223 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=594)
1389 Points ∼82% +14%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Honor 8A
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 2048
133 Points ∼19%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
133 Points ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=98)
701 Points ∼100% +427%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (14.7 - 108, n=70)
29 Points ∼100% +113%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
26.9 Points ∼93% +98%
Huawei Y6 2019
15.326 Points ∼53% +13%
Honor 8A
13.6 Points ∼47%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
13.6 Points ∼47% 0%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=64)
33 runs/min ∼100% +123%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chome 73)
27.44 runs/min ∼83% +85%
Huawei Y6 2019 (Chrome)
15.69 runs/min ∼48% +6%
Honor 8A (Chrome)
14.8 runs/min ∼45%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
14.8 runs/min ∼45% 0%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=125)
62.4 Points ∼100% +115%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
58 Points ∼93% +100%
Huawei Y6 2019
35 Points ∼56% +21%
Honor 8A (Chrome)
29 Points ∼46%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
29 Points ∼46% 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
8258 Points ∼100% +90%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=652)
6115 Points ∼74% +41%
Huawei Y6 2019 (Chrome)
4437 Points ∼54% +2%
Honor 8A (Chrome)
4347 Points ∼53%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
4347 Points ∼53% 0%
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
3389 Points ∼41% -22%
Wiko View 2 Go (Chrome 71)
3089 Points ∼37% -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Honor 7A (Chrome 67)
14709 ms * ∼100% -30%
Wiko View 2 Go (Chrome 71)
13373 ms * ∼91% -18%
Honor 8A (Chrome)
11323 ms * ∼77%
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
11323 ms * ∼77% -0%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=672)
10898 ms * ∼74% +4%
Huawei Y6 2019
10198 ms * ∼69% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73)
4856.4 ms * ∼33% +57%

* ... smaller is better

Honor 8AHonor 7A Xiaomi Redmi 7Huawei Y6 2019Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
3%
5%
-12%
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.83
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
63.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
64.45 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
49.3 (3.4 - 87.1, n=131)
-20%
48.3 (9.5 - 87.1, n=393)
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
81.92
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
85.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
83.16 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
68.1 (8.2 - 96.5, n=131)
-17%
66.4 (8.1 - 96.5, n=393)
-19%
Random Write 4KB
15
9.4
-37%
14.4
-4%
15
0%
18.5 (0.75 - 77.3, n=175)
23%
19.3 (0.14 - 250, n=701)
29%
Random Read 4KB
61
39.2
-36%
73.6
21%
69
13%
38 (3.59 - 117, n=175)
-38%
43.9 (1.59 - 175, n=701)
-28%
Sequential Write 256KB
104
72.5
-30%
84.7
-19%
107.78
4%
94.6 (14.8 - 189, n=175)
-9%
90.4 (2.99 - 392, n=701)
-13%
Sequential Read 256KB
265
254.8
-4%
298
12%
279.26
5%
233 (25.8 - 452, n=175)
-12%
255 (12.1 - 1468, n=701)
-4%
GameBench PUBG (niedrige Grafikeinstellungen)
010203040Tooltip
; 0.12.0: Ø20.6 (1-33)
GameBench Asphalt 9 (niedrige Grafikeinstellungen)
01020Tooltip
; 1.5.4a: Ø10 (5-17)
Gamebench Shadow Fight 3 (niedrige Grafikeinstellungen)
010203040506070Tooltip
; 1.18.3: Ø43 (1-61)
Carga Máxima
 32.4 °C32 °C34.6 °C 
 31.8 °C31.7 °C32.7 °C 
 30.8 °C30.6 °C33 °C 
Máximo: 34.6 °C
Médio: 32.2 °C
28.8 °C29.4 °C30.2 °C
29 °C29.5 °C31.7 °C
29.6 °C29.5 °C31 °C
Máximo: 31.7 °C
Médio: 29.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  31.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.536.42531.932.33122.325.44021.723.65029.237.56326.723.98020.323.910020.525.7125233816015.653.820017.852.925016.357.831515.462.640015.964.150015.864.363013.368.580014.168.6100014.172.812501477160013.577.2200013.480.3250013.979.6315014.279.8400013.979.3500014.679.1630014.276.2800014.776.5100001572.31250014.961.21600015.347.3SPL26.489.4N0.877.4median 14.7median 68.6Delta0.91142.646.338.438.734.231.337.326.53031.826.62823.222.421.221.12121.616.326.416.636.715.841.213.546.312.251.61252.611.75510.558.79.661.69.563.6965.38.567.48.569.28.371.38.269.38.167.68.165.18.162.38.264.48.353.38.235.265.451.721.959.978.619.17.10.31239median 9.5median 58.72.812.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor 8AHonor 7A
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor 8A audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 7A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.01 / 0.14 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 0.73 / 2.07 / 2.14 Watt
Carga midlight 4.3 / 5.96 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 8A
3020 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 7
4000 mAh
Huawei Y6 2019
3020 mAh
Wiko View 2 Go
4000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-17%
2%
21%
2%
0%
2%
Idle Minimum *
0.73
1.3
-78%
1
-37%
0.59
19%
0.8
-10%
0.73
-0%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=728)
-21%
Idle Average *
2.07
1.6
23%
1.7
18%
1.94
6%
2
3%
2.07
-0%
1.737 (0.6 - 6.2, n=727)
16%
Idle Maximum *
2.14
2.9
-36%
2.1
2%
1.96
8%
2.3
-7%
2.14
-0%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=728)
6%
Load Average *
4.3
3.7
14%
3.3
23%
2.82
34%
3.6
16%
4.3
-0%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=722)
5%
Load Maximum *
5.96
6.4
-7%
5.6
6%
3.57
40%
5.4
9%
5.96
-0%
5.87 (1.2 - 14.2, n=722)
2%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 48.8min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 17min
Carga (máximo brilho)
5h 01min
Honor 8A
3020 mAh
Honor 7A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 7
4000 mAh
Huawei Y6 2019
3020 mAh
Wiko View 2 Go
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-21%
-4%
-14%
-11%
Reader / Idle
1489
H.264
917
902
-2%
805
-12%
WiFi v1.3
828.8
657
-21%
848
2%
732.1
-12%
734
-11%
Load
301
268
-11%
249
-17%

Pro

+ Compacto
+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Excelente bateria
+ Software atual
+ Leitor de impressões digitais

Contra

- Micro USB
- Não apto para gamers
In review: Honor 8A.
In review: Honor 8A.

O Honor 7A já foi muito bom, e o Honor 8A é ainda melhor. O design dividido é definitivamente uma questão de gosto, e teríamos preferido um toque e sensação mais premium. No entanto, considerando o preço do Honor 8A, não temos problemas com isso. A tela é decente e muito mais brilhante do que no ano passado, a memória interna de armazenamento duplicou em capacidade e o desempenho geral também melhorou.

O Honor 8A é um smartphone de nível de entrada sem falhas reais. Considerando o preço quase idêntico, oferece mais do que seu competidor interno mais proeminente, o Huawei Y6 (2019).

A câmera provavelmente será suficiente para a maioria dos usuários - se você quiser mais, terá que pagar mais, é simples assim. No geral, o Honor 8A é um ótimo smartphone de nível de entrada por menos de $200. O Y6 marrom da Huawei pode oferecer um design mais elegante, mas não conta com um leitor de digitais, em troca.

Honor 8A - 05/23/2019 v6
Stefan Schomberg

Acabamento
76%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
78%
Conectividade
40 / 60 → 67%
Peso
92%
Bateria
96%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
21 / 63 → 33%
Desempenho da aplicação
49 / 70 → 70%
Temperatura
94%
Ruído
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
47%
Médio
69%
79%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor 8A
Stefan Schomberg, 2019-05-30 (Update: 2019-05-30)