Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 7
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 7 | |
| Wiko View 2 Go | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 | |
| Wiko View 2 Go | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 7 | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 444 cd/m²
Contraste: 987:1 (Preto: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.294
| Xiaomi Redmi 7 IPS, 1520x720, 6.26 | Xiaomi Redmi 6 IPS, 1440x720, 5.45 | Motorola Moto G7 Play IPS, 1512x720, 5.70 | Huawei P smart IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65 | Wiko View 2 Go IPS, 1512x720, 5.93 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -13% | -4% | 1% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 444 | 373 -16% | 479 8% | 573 29% | 465 5% |
| Brightness | 441 | 361 -18% | 481 9% | 568 29% | 462 5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 94 4% | 94 4% | 89 -1% | 84 -7% |
| Black Level * | 0.45 | 0.53 -18% | 0.37 18% | 0.63 -40% | 0.32 29% |
| Contrast | 987 | 704 -29% | 1295 31% | 910 -8% | 1453 47% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.94 | 4.22 -7% | 4.91 -25% | 4.2 -7% | 4.76 -21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.72 | 10.14 -51% | 9.47 -41% | 6.4 5% | 7.71 -15% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 3.3 31% | 6.4 -33% | 4.6 4% | 4.6 4% |
| Gamma | 2.294 96% | 2.321 95% | 2.108 104% | 2.24 98% | 2.674 82% |
| CCT | 7445 87% | 6862 95% | 7292 89% | 7157 91% | 6806 96% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 100 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 7 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Wiko View 2 Go | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (6.5 - 15, n=6) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 7 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Wiko View 2 Go | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (6.9 - 7, n=6) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 7 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
| Huawei P smart | |
| Wiko View 2 Go | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (97294 - 108408, n=5) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 () | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chome 73) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 () | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (50 - 58, n=3) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 (Chrome 70) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=214, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (8185 - 8420, n=6) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73) | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
| Huawei P smart (Chrome 64) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 (Chrome 70) | |
| Wiko View 2 Go (Chrome 71) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Wiko View 2 Go (Chrome 71) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 6 (Chrome 70) | |
| Huawei P smart (Chrome 64) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (4806 - 5037, n=5) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 7 (Chrome 73) | |
| Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi 7 | Xiaomi Redmi 6 | Motorola Moto G7 Play | Huawei P smart | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 26% | 73% | 14% | -3% | 913% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 298 | 287 -4% | 289 -3% | 269.4 -10% | 242 ? -19% | 1508 ? 406% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 84.7 | 118.4 40% | 111 31% | 121.1 43% | 100.5 ? 19% | 1118 ? 1220% |
| Random Read 4KB | 73.6 | 52.5 -29% | 74 1% | 66.1 -10% | 43.2 ? -41% | 247 ? 236% |
| Random Write 4KB | 14.4 | 36.3 152% | 73 407% | 21.3 48% | 22.4 ? 56% | 272 ? 1789% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 85.9 ? | 82.9 ? -3% | 84.7 ? -1% | 82.3 ? -4% | 71.8 ? -16% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 63.3 ? | 64.4 ? 2% | 64.1 ? 1% | 72.4 ? 14% | 52.9 ? -16% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 67.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 67.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 67.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (123.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi 6 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0 / 0.1 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1 / 1.7 / 2.1 Watt |
| Carga |
3.3 / 5.6 Watt |
    
| |
| Xiaomi Redmi 7 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 6 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 Play 3000 mAh | Huawei P smart 3000 mAh | Wiko View 2 Go 4000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 19% | -13% | -1% | -3% | -10% | -14% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1 | 0.6 40% | 1 -0% | 0.62 38% | 0.8 20% | 0.924 ? 8% | 0.897 ? 10% |
| Idle Average * | 1.7 | 1.3 24% | 1.7 -0% | 1.76 -4% | 2 -18% | 1.748 ? -3% | 1.452 ? 15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.1 | 2.1 -0% | 2.6 -24% | 1.87 11% | 2.3 -10% | 2.36 ? -12% | 1.629 ? 22% |
| Load Average * | 3.3 | 3 9% | 4.1 -24% | 4.47 -35% | 3.6 -9% | 4.18 ? -27% | 5.55 ? -68% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.6 | 4.4 21% | 6.5 -16% | 6.39 -14% | 5.4 4% | 6.6 ? -18% | 8.31 ? -48% |
* ... smaller is better
| Xiaomi Redmi 7 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 6 3000 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 Play 3000 mAh | Huawei P smart 3000 mAh | Wiko View 2 Go 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -13% | -19% | -31% | -13% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1489 | 1425 -4% | 985 -34% | ||
| H.264 | 902 | 752 -17% | 615 -32% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 848 | 695 -18% | 690 -19% | 565 -33% | 734 -13% |
| Load | 268 | 238 -11% | 202 -25% |
Pro
Contra
Verdict – good price and performance coming from China
Apesar da concorrência tentar recuperar o atraso, a Xiaomi continua a oferecer a melhor relação preço-desempenho. O Redmi 7 oferece bom desempenho, câmeras decentes, durações de bateria muito longas, um design chamativo, uma carcaça estável, um alto-falante decente, um leitor de digitais rápido e um software mais ou menos atualizado por menos de 150 USD.
A Xiaomi mais uma vez criou um ótimo smartphone a um preço acessível: o Redmi 7.
Naturalmente, o módulo GPS não é totalmente confiável e o fone de ouvido poderia ser mais potente. A garantia é outro problema, além disso, há muito bloatware desnecessário. Mas considerando seu baixo preço, o Xiaomi Redmi 7 é realmente uma excelente oferta. Se você está procurando por um smartphone acessível e moderno, não ficará perto da série Redmi.
No entanto, dispositivos como o Moto G7 Play mostram que a Xiaomi não é mais o único fabricante a ter entendido como criar um smartphone acessível com alto desempenho. Se você está procurando uma resolução de tela mais alta e uma câmera ainda melhor, pode dar uma olhada no Huawei P Smart (2018), que é apenas minimamente mais caro. No entanto, nenhum desses dois dispositivos pode alcançar o nível do Redmi 7 em termos de tempo de duração da bateria.
Xiaomi Redmi 7
-
10/31/2019 v7
Florian Schmitt
Pricecompare
