Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor Play

Play with honor. O primeiro smartphone de jogos da Huawei está chegando ao hemisfério ocidental: Embora o Honor Play não se pareça particularmente com um dispositivo de jogos, ele deve impressionar os jogadores com seu preço baixo. Vamos dar uma olhada se esta é uma vantagem ou desvantagem e se o telefone oferece potência suficiente para os jogos atuais.
Honor Play (Play Serie)
Processador
HiSilicon Kirin 970 8 x 2.4 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53
Placa gráfica
ARM Mali-G72 MP12
Memória
4 GB 
Pantalha
6.30 polegadas 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, Tela táctil capacitiva, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 54 GB livre
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: microSD de até 256GB, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensores: acelerômetro, giroscópio, sensor de proximidade, bússola, USB-C
Funcionamento em rede
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/900/2100), LTE (1/3/5/7/8/20/38/39/40/41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 7.5 x 157.9 x 74.3
Bateria
3750 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix dual: f/​2.2, Detecção facial Auto Focus (AF), LED flash, videos @2160p/​30fps (câmera principal); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, profundidade de campo (câmera secundária)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.0, videos @1080p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Un só alto-falante na borda inferior, Teclado: Teclado virtual, Adaptador de CA, cabo USB, ferramenta SIM, capa de silicone, 24 Meses Garantia, LTE Cat. 18 (1.2 GBit/s download, 250 MBit/s upload); SAR value: 1.10 W/kg (body)
peso
176 g, Suprimento de energia: 68 g
Preço
350 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Honor Play
Honor Play
Honor Play
Honor Play
Honor Play
Honor Play

Size Comparison

161.6 mm 75.4 mm 9.3 mm 190 g158.4 mm 75.64 mm 9.55 mm 186 g158.5 mm 77.7 mm 8 mm 197 g157.9 mm 74.3 mm 7.5 mm 176 g156.5 mm 76.5 mm 6.75 mm 156 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 MBit/s +248%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
307 MBit/s +62%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
237 MBit/s +25%
Honor Play
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
190 MBit/s
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
117 MBit/s -38%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Phone 2017
Adreno 540, SD 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
665 MBit/s +254%
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s +100%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s +31%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
232 MBit/s +23%
Honor Play
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
188 MBit/s
Xiaomi Black Shark
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
116 MBit/s -38%
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – woods
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – woods
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Honor Play – overview
GPS Honor Play – overview
GPS Honor Play – woods
GPS Honor Play – woods
GPS Honor Play – bridge
GPS Honor Play – bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
396
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
403
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 445 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 425.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.12 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 435 cd/m²
Contraste: 1115:1 (Preto: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.251
Honor Play
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.30
Razer Phone 2017
IGZO LCD, 120 Hz, Wide Color Gamut, 1440x2560, 5.72
Xiaomi Black Shark
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.00
Nokia 7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6.00
Screen
12%
-22%
-34%
9%
Brightness middle
435
436
0%
549
26%
446
3%
458
5%
Brightness
426
417
-2%
541
27%
451
6%
463
9%
Brightness Distribution
89
92
3%
95
7%
93
4%
92
3%
Black Level *
0.39
0.16
59%
0.42
-8%
0.22
44%
Contrast
1115
2725
144%
1307
17%
2082
87%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.89
3.88
-34%
6.08
-110%
6.58
-128%
4
-38%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.03
7.96
-32%
10.69
-77%
11.94
-98%
7.4
-23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.1
5.8
-41%
6.6
-61%
3.6
12%
4.7
-15%
Gamma
2.251 98%
2.45 90%
2.305 95%
2.199 100%
2.19 100%
CCT
7408 88%
7657 85%
8399 77%
7116 91%
7425 88%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 83.3 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 83.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 83.3 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor Play
178745 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark
230642 Points +29%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
93813 Points -48%
Nokia 7 Plus
117165 Points -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (173653 - 181973, n=8)
177915 Points 0%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Honor Play
152773 Points
Razer Phone 2017
208972 Points +37%
Xiaomi Black Shark
290397 Points +90%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
115656 Points -24%
Nokia 7 Plus
141701 Points -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (152773 - 212278, n=6)
197811 Points +29%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Honor Play
9326 Points
Razer Phone 2017
7968 Points -15%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
6457 Points -31%
Nokia 7 Plus
6825 Points -27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (8115 - 9326, n=8)
8537 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points +62%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Honor Play
6293 Points
Razer Phone 2017
7046 Points +12%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8309 Points +32%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
5640 Points -10%
Nokia 7 Plus
6077 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6293 - 7046, n=8)
6860 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points +73%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Honor Play
2174 Points
Razer Phone 2017
3651 Points +68%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3489 Points +60%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2044 Points -6%
Nokia 7 Plus
2369 Points +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2174 - 3374, n=8)
3125 Points +44%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)
5745 Points +164%
System (sort by value)
Honor Play
3795 Points
Razer Phone 2017
5660 Points +49%
Xiaomi Black Shark
7105 Points +87%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
4628 Points +22%
Nokia 7 Plus
4976 Points +31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3795 - 5987, n=8)
5387 Points +42%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)
9678 Points +155%
Memory (sort by value)
Honor Play
2417 Points
Razer Phone 2017
4085 Points +69%
Xiaomi Black Shark
2871 Points +19%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2208 Points -9%
Nokia 7 Plus
2503 Points +4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2417 - 4578, n=8)
3946 Points +63%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)
6250 Points +159%
Graphics (sort by value)
Honor Play
2231 Points
Razer Phone 2017
6273 Points +181%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5846 Points +162%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1625 Points -27%
Nokia 7 Plus
2298 Points +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2231 - 4397, n=8)
3638 Points +63%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)
14101 Points +532%
Web (sort by value)
Honor Play
1091 Points
Razer Phone 2017
1225 Points +12%
Xiaomi Black Shark
1243 Points +14%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1052 Points -4%
Nokia 7 Plus
1101 Points +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1091 - 1316, n=8)
1245 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)
1494 Points +37%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor Play
1904 Points
Razer Phone 2017
1942 Points +2%
Xiaomi Black Shark
2437 Points +28%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1330 Points -30%
Nokia 7 Plus
1646 Points -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1883 - 1922, n=8)
1901 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)
5228 Points +175%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Honor Play
6673 Points
Razer Phone 2017
6742 Points +1%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8453 Points +27%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
4941 Points -26%
Nokia 7 Plus
5867 Points -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6557 - 6792, n=8)
6697 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)
14045 Points +110%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Honor Play
8454 Points
Razer Phone 2017
7931 Points -6%
Xiaomi Black Shark
13620 Points +61%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
4501 Points -47%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (5779 - 9015, n=6)
8080 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)
10872 Points +29%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Honor Play
29924 Points
Razer Phone 2017
42278 Points +41%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60543 Points +102%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
19873 Points -34%
Nokia 7 Plus
26610 Points -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (20022 - 31605, n=8)
29035 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Honor Play
34836 Points
Razer Phone 2017
58360 Points +68%
Xiaomi Black Shark
82423 Points +137%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
20908 Points -40%
Nokia 7 Plus
29333 Points -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (22429 - 36231, n=8)
32596 Points -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Honor Play
20035 Points
Razer Phone 2017
21521 Points +7%
Xiaomi Black Shark
31384 Points +57%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
16939 Points -15%
Nokia 7 Plus
20085 Points 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (14556 - 23046, n=8)
21027 Points +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Honor Play
3487 Points
Razer Phone 2017
5030 Points +44%
Xiaomi Black Shark
6324 Points +81%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1474 Points -58%
Nokia 7 Plus
2035 Points -42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1943 - 3487, n=8)
3155 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)
3766 Points +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Honor Play
3734 Points
Razer Phone 2017
6127 Points +64%
Xiaomi Black Shark
8312 Points +123%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
1333 Points -64%
Nokia 7 Plus
1895 Points -49%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1954 - 3734, n=8)
3305 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)
4186 Points +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Honor Play
2832 Points
Razer Phone 2017
3092 Points +9%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3443 Points +22%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2337 Points -17%
Nokia 7 Plus
2734 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (1906 - 2902, n=8)
2732 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)
3082 Points +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Honor Play
2973 Points
Razer Phone 2017
3810 Points +28%
Xiaomi Black Shark
4668 Points +57%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
953 Points -68%
Nokia 7 Plus
1332 Points -55%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2850 - 2999, n=8)
2958 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=103, last 2 years)
2770 Points -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Honor Play
3018 Points
Razer Phone 2017
4049 Points +34%
Xiaomi Black Shark
5220 Points +73%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
815 Points -73%
Nokia 7 Plus
1161 Points -62%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2844 - 3040, n=8)
2994 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=103, last 2 years)
2769 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Honor Play
2827 Points
Razer Phone 2017
3157 Points +12%
Xiaomi Black Shark
3408 Points +21%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
2327 Points -18%
Nokia 7 Plus
2749 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (2582 - 2931, n=8)
2842 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=103, last 2 years)
3166 Points +12%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play
60 fps
Razer Phone 2017
79 fps +32%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60 fps 0%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
35 fps -42%
Nokia 7 Plus
48 fps -20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (42 - 60, n=8)
57.4 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=183, last 2 years)
84.6 fps +41%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play
115 fps
Razer Phone 2017
117 fps +2%
Xiaomi Black Shark
151 fps +31%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
36 fps -69%
Nokia 7 Plus
50 fps -57%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (45 - 125, n=8)
108 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=183, last 2 years)
247 fps +115%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Honor Play
55 fps
Razer Phone 2017
40 fps -27%
Xiaomi Black Shark
59 fps +7%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
15 fps -73%
Nokia 7 Plus
22 fps -60%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (26 - 56, n=8)
50.4 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=185, last 2 years)
72.2 fps +31%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play
62 fps
Razer Phone 2017
43 fps -31%
Xiaomi Black Shark
82 fps +32%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
16 fps -74%
Nokia 7 Plus
23 fps -63%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (23 - 66, n=8)
54.6 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 363, n=185, last 2 years)
140.6 fps +127%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play
31 fps
Razer Phone 2017
22 fps -29%
Xiaomi Black Shark
53 fps +71%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
9.8 fps -68%
Nokia 7 Plus
15 fps -52%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (18 - 39, n=8)
33.6 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=185, last 2 years)
60.9 fps +96%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play
39 fps
Razer Phone 2017
21 fps -46%
Xiaomi Black Shark
60 fps +54%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
10 fps -74%
Nokia 7 Plus
14 fps -64%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (19 - 39, n=8)
33.9 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 279, n=185, last 2 years)
99 fps +154%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play
19 fps
Razer Phone 2017
15 fps -21%
Xiaomi Black Shark
31 fps +63%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
6 fps -68%
Nokia 7 Plus
9.1 fps -52%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (10 - 23, n=8)
19.8 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=185, last 2 years)
43.4 fps +128%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Honor Play
20 fps
Razer Phone 2017
25 fps +25%
Xiaomi Black Shark
35 fps +75%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
6.3 fps -68%
Nokia 7 Plus
8.3 fps -58%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (11 - 23, n=8)
20.4 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=185, last 2 years)
59.9 fps +200%

Legend

 
Honor Play HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Razer Phone 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Black Shark Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Motorola Moto Z3 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)
104.3 Points +215%
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)
63.3 Points +91%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
53.9 Points +63%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (33.1 - 58.6, n=8)
51.4 Points +55%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
44.59 Points +35%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
33.09 Points
Xiaomi Black Shark
Points -100%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years)
33640 Points +403%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
13663 Points +104%
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)
12600 Points +88%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
10945 Points +64%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6692 - 11838, n=8)
10111 Points +51%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
8519 Points +27%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
6692 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
6221 ms *
Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67)
4820 ms * +23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3591 - 6221, n=8)
4378 ms * +30%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
3937 ms * +37%
Razer Phone 2017 (Chrome 65)
3476 ms * +44%
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
2287 ms * +63%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * +74%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Black Shark (Firefox 61)
246 Points +107%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
168 Points +41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (119 - 187, n=8)
165.4 Points +39%
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
154 Points +29%
Honor Play (Chrome 68)
119 Points

* ... smaller is better

Honor PlayRazer Phone 2017Xiaomi Black SharkMotorola Moto Z3 PlayNokia 7 PlusAverage 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-22%
-12%
-31%
-37%
-16%
177%
Sequential Read 256KB
895
732
-18%
742
-17%
271.7
-70%
283.1
-68%
696 ?(392 - 895, n=52)
-22%
Sequential Write 256KB
188.3
202.5
8%
199.6
6%
182.5
-3%
211.6
12%
Random Read 4KB
142.4
142.5
0%
127.2
-11%
60.6
-57%
54.7
-62%
137.2 ?(78.2 - 192, n=52)
-4%
Random Write 4KB
155.5
14.3
-91%
114.1
-27%
84.1
-46%
19.62
-87%
84.7 ?(8.77 - 208, n=52)
-46%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.4
-4%
83.7
1%
82.2
-1%
68.6 ?(18 - 87.1, n=33)
-17%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
71.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
52.5
-27%
62.7
-13%
62.3
-13%
52.2 ?(17.1 - 71.9, n=33)
-27%
PUBG Mobile
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 Smooth32 fps
 HD32 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 ConfiguraçõesValor
 min55 fps
 high HD54 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Carga Máxima
 41.3 °C38.3 °C39.6 °C 
 41.5 °C38.6 °C40.2 °C 
 40.2 °C38.4 °C39.5 °C 
Máximo: 41.5 °C
Médio: 39.7 °C
36.1 °C37.8 °C39 °C
36.6 °C38.3 °C39.2 °C
37.1 °C38.8 °C39.7 °C
Máximo: 39.7 °C
Médio: 38.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  45.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.728.42533.934.53147.648.94031.236.7503837.76327.130.78027.130.310024.624.512520.620.516018.829.920018.544.925017.749.93151750.840016.555.850016.955.563014.454.28001460.4100013.562.1125013.766.7160013.969.5200012.770.1250012.771.7315012.771.7400012.569.9500011.968.2630011.465800011.562.81000011.662.81250011.561.71600011.449.4SPL67.725.780.2N21.20.742.6median 13.9median 60.4median 61.4Delta4.21218.829.525.929.526.427.726.426.526.526.526.628.326.625.525.225.523.922.723.926.523.626.533.623.333.640.230.540.245.821.145.852.420.652.455.322.955.357.921.157.960.921.560.964.822.364.869.117.569.171.520.171.569.719.969.77018.27069.51669.570.715.770.771.614.871.669.614.569.666.914.266.968146867.813.867.868.913.968.966.51466.562.71462.758.613.858.681.229.381.251.51.251.5median 66.9median 17.5median 66.96.63.86.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor PlayRazer Phone 2017
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor Play audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (122.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Razer Phone 2017 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.2 / 0.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 1.4 / 2.6 / 4.3 Watt
Carga midlight 6.5 / 8.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Honor Play
3750 mAh
Razer Phone 2017
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 970
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
24%
27%
30%
33%
23%
31%
Idle Minimum *
1.4
0.83
41%
0.8
43%
1.3
7%
0.65
54%
0.978 ?(0.67 - 1.4, n=8)
30%
Idle Average *
2.6
2.11
19%
1.5
42%
2
23%
1.76
32%
2.12 ?(1.15 - 2.7, n=8)
18%
Idle Maximum *
4.3
2.24
48%
2.3
47%
2.7
37%
1.78
59%
2.51 ?(1.23 - 4.3, n=8)
42%
Load Average *
6.5
4.94
24%
4.8
26%
3.7
43%
4.47
31%
5.01 ?(2.47 - 6.5, n=8)
23%
Load Maximum *
8.2
9.08
-11%
10.1
-23%
5.1
38%
9.13
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
28h 43min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 39min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 24min
Honor Play
3750 mAh
Razer Phone 2017
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Black Shark
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Battery Runtime
7%
6%
-15%
-9%
Reader / Idle
1723
1753
2%
1245
-28%
1703
-1%
H.264
759
747
-2%
648
-15%
706
-7%
WiFi v1.3
710
762
7%
711
0%
595
-16%
672
-5%
Load
204
253
24%
199
-2%
158
-23%

Pro

+ Boa relação de preço-desempenho
+ Carcaça discreta
+ A câmera tira fotos nítidas
+ Boa reprodução de cores na tela
+ Tela táctil precisa
+ Armazenamento veloz
+ Boas durações da bateria

Contra

- O telefone superaquece sob uso intenso
- Trapaceia nos benchmarks
- Cores exageradas no modo IA da câmera
- Bloatware pré-instalado
- Wi-Fi lento
In review: Honor Play. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.
In review: Honor Play. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.

O Honor Play não é feito para jogadores hardcore que querem tirar o máximo de quadros possíveis de seus smartphones. Ele está direcionado a um grupo maior de usuários de telefones celulares que querem um dispositivo de boa aparência que também permita que eles joguem jogos mais exigentes de maneira confiável. O Honor Play conseguiu cumprir estes requisitos: Seu desempenho é totalmente suficiente, sua tela tem cores precisas, não há atrasos ao reagir a entradas e oferece uma longa duração de bateria.

No entanto, não espere muito dos recursos que cheiram a marketing: O efeito de som 3D para fones de ouvido é muito divertido, assim como o recurso de som no PUBG. O último, no entanto, ainda é limitado a certos jogos no momento. O tempo dirá se mais jogos irão suportá-lo no futuro. O software também não oferece uma vibe de jogos particularmente forte - a Xiaomi e a Razer tornam isso muito mais claro quando lidamos com um smartphone de jogos dedicado.

O Honor Play é um smartphone de jogos discreto com uma boa relação preço/desempenho para necessidades médias. 

No geral, isso nos deixa com um ótimo smartphone de gama média disponível por um bom preço, como seria de se esperar de um Honor. Todos os gamers com requisitos normais que ocasionalmente querem jogar um jogo mais exigente, mas não estão muito preocupados com gráficos, devem ficar muito satisfeitos com este dispositivo. Se você está procurando um modo de 120 Hz ou um design de jogos mais chamativo, você terá que procurar um pouco mais. Por outro lado, o Honor Play é mais discreto. Se você quiser jogar jogos durante uma reunião chata, o Honor Play pode ser uma boa escolha.

Honor Play - 09/14/2018 v6(old)
Florian Wimmer

Acabamento
79%
Teclado
65 / 75 → 87%
Mouse
91%
Conectividade
42 / 60 → 70%
Peso
90%
Bateria
94%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
63 / 63 → 100%
Desempenho da aplicação
65 / 70 → 93%
Temperatura
80%
Ruído
100%
Camera
76%
Médio
78%
86%
Smartphone - Médio equilibrado

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Smartphone Honor Play
Florian Wimmer, 2018-09-22 (Update: 2018-09-29)