Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Smartphone Motorola Moto Z3 Play
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Huawei P20 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| Honor 10 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei P20 | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| Honor 10 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 239 cd/m²
Contraste: ∞:1 (Preto: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.58 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
147% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.199
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.00 | OnePlus 6 Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.28 | Lenovo Moto Z2 Play AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.50 | Honor 10 IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84 | Huawei P20 LTPS, 2240x1080, 5.80 | Nokia 7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 24% | 3% | 25% | 59% | 9% | |
| Brightness middle | 446 | 430 -4% | 434 -3% | 555 24% | 753 69% | 458 3% |
| Brightness | 451 | 437 -3% | 404 -10% | 537 19% | 748 66% | 463 3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 87 -6% | 81 -13% | 94 1% | 96 3% | 92 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.37 | 0.22 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.58 | 2.3 65% | 4.4 33% | 2.3 65% | 1.3 80% | 4 39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.94 | 4.6 61% | 8.6 28% | 6 50% | 2.3 81% | 7.4 38% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 2.4 33% | 4.2 -17% | 3.9 -8% | 1.7 53% | 4.7 -31% |
| Gamma | 2.199 100% | 2.28 96% | 2.24 98% | 2.19 100% | 2.18 101% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 7116 91% | 6160 106% | 7343 89% | 6212 105% | 66.76 9736% | 7425 88% |
| Contrast | 1423 | 2035 | 2082 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 236 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 236 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 236 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | |
| Honor 10 | |
| Huawei P20 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (92015 - 125213, n=10) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Honor 10 | |
| Huawei P20 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (115565 - 138661, n=11) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (44.2 - 51.5, n=11) | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126) | |
| Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (8163 - 9746, n=12) | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67) | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59) | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4105 - 5066, n=12) | |
| Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=172, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Huawei P20 (Chrome 66.0.3359.126) | |
| Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (147 - 184, n=8) | |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | |
| Lenovo Moto Z2 Play (Chrome 59) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play | OnePlus 6 | Lenovo Moto Z2 Play | Honor 10 | Huawei P20 | Nokia 7 Plus | Average 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 57% | -21% | 111% | 111% | -12% | 24% | 373% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 271.7 | 726 167% | 245.6 -10% | 828 205% | 827 204% | 283.1 4% | 512 ? 88% | 1505 ? 454% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 182.5 | 201.4 10% | 137.5 -25% | 192.1 5% | 193.6 6% | 211.6 16% | 180.8 ? -1% | 1112 ? 509% |
| Random Read 4KB | 60.6 | 137 126% | 38.2 -37% | 145.9 141% | 147 143% | 54.7 -10% | 114.2 ? 88% | 247 ? 308% |
| Random Write 4KB | 84.1 | 21.8 -74% | 47.9 -43% | 163 94% | 161.5 92% | 19.62 -77% | 80.1 ? -5% | 271 ? 222% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.7 | 79.7 ? -5% | 82.2 -2% | 73.4 ? -12% | ||||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.7 | 58.7 ? -6% | 62.3 -1% | 55.4 ? -12% |
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| min | 59 fps | ||
| high HD | 59 fps | ||
| PUBG Mobile | |||
| Configurações | Valor | ||
| Smooth | 30 fps | ||
| HD | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Moto Z2 Play audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.1 / 1 Watt |
| Ocioso |  1.3 / 2 / 2.7 Watt |
| Carga |
3.7 / 5.1 Watt |
    
| |
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play 3000 mAh | OnePlus 6 3300 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z2 Play 3000 mAh | Honor 10 3400 mAh | Huawei P20 3400 mAh | Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 12% | 55% | -16% | -12% | -1% | -9% | -3% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.3 | 0.6 54% | 0.45 65% | 1.12 14% | 0.67 48% | 0.65 50% | 0.944 ? 27% | 0.897 ? 31% |
| Idle Average * | 2 | 1 50% | 0.78 61% | 2.26 -13% | 2.05 -3% | 1.76 12% | 2.22 ? -11% | 1.452 ? 27% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.7 | 1.6 41% | 0.84 69% | 2.3 15% | 2.11 22% | 1.78 34% | 2.54 ? 6% | 1.629 ? 40% |
| Load Average * | 3.7 | 4.3 -16% | 1.69 54% | 5.14 -39% | 6.15 -66% | 4.47 -21% | 4.51 ? -22% | 5.55 ? -50% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.1 | 8.6 -69% | 3.79 26% | 7.89 -55% | 8.09 -59% | 9.13 -79% | 7.37 ? -45% | 8.31 ? -63% |
* ... smaller is better
| Motorola Moto Z3 Play 3000 mAh | OnePlus 6 3300 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z2 Play 3000 mAh | Honor 10 3400 mAh | Huawei P20 3400 mAh | Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 30% | 60% | 4% | 41% | 10% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1245 | 1806 45% | 1589 28% | 1162 -7% | 1888 52% | 1703 37% |
| H.264 | 648 | 791 22% | 946 46% | 662 2% | 810 25% | 706 9% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 595 | 762 28% | 749 26% | 663 11% | 818 37% | 672 13% |
| Load | 199 | 246 24% | 477 140% | 216 9% | 295 48% | 158 -21% |
Pro
Contra
Não há quase nenhum outro fabricante oferecendo um conceito modular semelhante ao da Motorola: A LG retirou-se do mercado de smartphones modulares após uma única tentativa com o LG G5, e o Fairphone 2 baseia-se mais na habilidade de trocar componentes individuais quando quebram ou ficam obsoletos. Em contraste, a série Moto Z da Motorola permite que o usuário conecte qualquer componente da gama disponível de acessórios à traseira do smartphone. Somente a capacidade de trocar as capas de estilo, criando uma traseira diferente, pode ser um aspecto importante para muitos usuários.
O Moto Z3 Play continua compatível com todos os Moto Mods anteriores, o que é outra vantagem desta série. O dispositivo oferece um desempenho de gama média atualizado e ainda vem com um mod de bateria como um brinde adicional na caixa. Este mod aumenta significativamente a capacidade da bateria e os tempos de duração da bateria do Moto Z3 Play. No entanto, deve-se notar que os tempos de duração sem o mod são realmente baixos, por mais estranho que pareça, inclusive em comparação com o predecessor. Provavelmente o maior culpável aqui seja o alto consumo de energia do Moto Z3 Play, mas talvez a Motorola possa melhorar esse aspecto em uma futura atualização de software. Atualmente, o consumo de energia é muito alto.
A tela vibrante, a carcaça de alta qualidade, o GPS decente, o Android puro com garantia de atualização e as câmeras aceitáveis completam o pacote.
O Moto Z3 Play é um dispositivo fino de gama média com durações curtas de bateria. Ele se destaca mais que tudo pelos seus mods.
Os tempos de duração mais curtos da bateria, em comparação com o modelo predecessor, são contrastados pelo desempenho mais alto e pelas opções de comunicação mais avançadas. Dado o preço muito mais baixo, o Moto Z2 Play pode ser uma boa alternativa para quem quer experimentar o sistema Moto Mod.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play
-
07/02/2018 v6(old)
Florian Wimmer